Next Article in Journal
A Study on the Combined Flotation–Roasting–Leaching Process for Treating High-Carbon Gold Ore and Its Kinetics
Previous Article in Journal
Geochemical Distribution, Integrated Contamination, and Human Health Risks of Potentially Toxic Elements in Najran Agricultural Soils, Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Magnetic-Field-Assisted LIBS-Based Enhancement of REE Detection Sensitivity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Multi-Constraint Framework for Geochemical Anomaly Detection Based on Compositional Data Analysis and Spatial Statistics: Implications for Copper Mineralization in Eastern Tianshan

1
Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
2
College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China
3
Technology and Engineering Center for Space Utilization, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
4
Institute of Geological Survey, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
5
Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
6
School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, China
7
School of Future Technology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2026, 16(7), 694; https://doi.org/10.3390/min16070694
Submission received: 5 May 2026 / Revised: 24 June 2026 / Accepted: 26 June 2026 / Published: 30 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Metal Minerals, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

Geochemical anomaly detection plays a critical role in mineral exploration, yet conventional methods are often limited by compositional effects, sensitivity to outliers, and insufficient consideration of spatial relationships. To address these issues, this study proposes an integrated analytical framework that combines compositional data analysis and spatial statistics for robust geochemical anomaly identification. The framework incorporates isometric log-ratio (ILR) transformation to eliminate the closure effect, robust principal component analysis (RPCA) to extract stable geochemical patterns, local indicators of spatial association (LISAs) to characterize spatial clustering, and compositional balance analysis (CoBA) to enhance anomaly signals. The method is applied to the Barkol Lake area in the Eastern Tianshan, a key metallogenic belt within the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. The results reveal significant geochemical anomalies characterized by Cu-associated element assemblages (e.g., Cu–Ni–Cr), which are spatially correlated with major fault zones and volcanic–intrusive complexes. The identified anomalies show strong consistency with known mineral occurrences and delineate several prospective targets for copper polymetallic mineralization. Compared with conventional approaches, the proposed framework demonstrates improved robustness to outliers, enhanced sensitivity to weak anomalies, and better integration of compositional and spatial constraints.

1. Introduction

Geochemical anomaly detection is a fundamental step in mineral exploration and plays a crucial role in identifying potential mineralization targets. With the increasing availability of large-scale geochemical datasets, a variety of statistical and machine learning methods have been developed to improve anomaly recognition. However, conventional approaches often suffer from several inherent limitations, including sensitivity to outliers, neglect of compositional constraints, and insufficient integration of spatial information [1,2,3].
Geochemical data are intrinsically compositional in nature, meaning that they are subject to constant-sum constraints that can lead to spurious correlations and biased statistical interpretations [4]. To address this issue, compositional data analysis (CoDA) has been widely applied in geochemical studies, particularly through log-ratio transformations such as the isometric log-ratio (ILR) [5,6,7], which effectively eliminate closure effects and enable meaningful statistical analysis [8,9,10,11].
Within the CoDA framework, the variation matrix provides a fundamental tool for quantifying pairwise log-ratio variances between components, thereby capturing the intrinsic relationships and relative variability among geochemical elements [12,13,14]. Although the variation matrix effectively characterizes internal compositional structure, it does not explicitly account for noise, outliers, or spatial heterogeneity in geochemical data [15,16,17].
To overcome these limitations, robust principal component analysis (RPCA) is employed to extract stable geochemical patterns while minimizing the influence of extreme values [18,19,20]. In addition, spatial statistical approaches, such as local indicators of spatial association (LISAs), are introduced to identify spatial clustering of anomalies and distinguish between meaningful geochemical signals and random variations [21,22]. Despite these advances, most existing studies treat compositional structure, statistical robustness, and spatial relationships independently, lacking an integrated analytical framework that links these components. Therefore, this study proposes an integrated approach that combines compositional, statistical, and spatial constraints for geochemical anomaly detection. The proposed framework incorporates ILR transformation to address compositional effects, RPCA to enhance robustness, LISAs to characterize spatial structures, and compositional balance analysis (CoBA) to further refine anomaly signals. The methodology is applied to the Barlikun Lake area in the Eastern Tianshan, which is part of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB)—one of the most important metallogenic belts globally, hosting numerous copper and polymetallic deposits.
The objectives of this study are to:
(1)
Develop a multi-constraint analytical framework for geochemical anomaly detection;
(2)
Identify geochemical anomalies associated with copper polymetallic mineralization;
(3)
Evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method for mineral prospectivity mapping in complex geological settings.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Sampling

The study area is located in the Barlikun Lake region of eastern Xinjiang, northwestern China, within the western part of Barlikun Autonomous County (Figure 1). Geographically, the area lies approximately between 92°00′–93°00′ E and 43°20′–44°00′ N and belongs to the eastern segment of the Tianshan Mountains [23,24,25]. Tectonically, the region is situated within the Eastern Tianshan orogenic belt, which forms an important segment of the southern margin of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) [26,27,28]. The CAOB represents one of the largest accretionary orogenic belts in the world and experienced a complex tectonic evolution during the Paleozoic, involving oceanic subduction, accretion, continental collision, and post-collisional extension. These tectonic processes led to extensive magmatism, strong structural deformation, and widespread metallogenic activity in the Eastern Tianshan region. The Eastern Tianshan is one of the most important metallogenic belts in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, hosting numerous Cu, Ni, Au, and polymetallic deposits [29,30].
The stratigraphic framework of the study area is dominated by Paleozoic strata, including Devonian (Figure 2), Carboniferous, and Permian formations, whereas Mesozoic–Cenozoic deposits mainly occur in intermontane basins and lowlands. The Devonian strata are mainly composed of marine sedimentary rocks, including sandstones, siltstones, and mudstones, locally interbedded with volcanic clastic rocks. The Carboniferous strata are the most widely distributed lithological units in the region and consist mainly of volcanic–sedimentary assemblages such as tuff, volcanic breccia, and andesitic volcanic rocks, reflecting intense volcanic activity during this period. The Permian strata are dominated by continental clastic deposits, including sandstones, conglomerates, and mudstones, which commonly overlie the Carboniferous formations with unconformable contacts. Mesozoic and Cenozoic sediments, including Jurassic and Quaternary deposits, are mainly distributed within the Barlikun basin and surrounding intermontane depressions.
Magmatic rocks are widely distributed in the study area and mainly include intermediate–felsic intrusive rocks and mafic-to-intermediate volcanic rocks. Major lithologies include granite, granodiorite, diorite, and andesite. Most magmatic activities occurred during the Carboniferous to Permian, corresponding to the late stages of the Paleozoic tectonic evolution of the Eastern Tianshan orogenic belt. These magmatic events are closely associated with regional tectonic processes and played an important role in the metallogenic evolution of the region.
The structural framework of the study area is dominated by fault systems and fold structures. Regional structures generally exhibit an east–west orientation, consistent with the overall structural trend of the Tianshan orogenic belt and forming a complex fault network. These faults are considered to play a significant role in controlling the emplacement of magmatic rocks and the distribution of mineralization. In addition, Paleozoic strata in the area have undergone multiple phases of tectonic deformation, resulting in the development of folds whose axial trends are generally parallel to the regional east–west structural direction.
The Barlikun Lake region hosts a variety of mineral resources and is characterized by well-developed copper and polymetallic mineralization. Ore bodies commonly occur as veins or lenticular bodies within volcanic and sedimentary rocks and are frequently associated with fault zones. The main ore minerals include chalcopyrite, bornite, and malachite, accompanied by hydrothermal alteration such as silicification, chloritization, and carbonation. These geological features suggest that mineralization in the study area is closely related to hydrothermal processes controlled by regional fault systems and magmatic activity, forming favorable conditions for copper polymetallic mineralization.
In this study, geological and geochemical sets (Stream sediment sampling Figure 3) were used as evidence sources for mineral prospect mapping. This geological map was compiled by the China Geological Survey (CGS) and includes intrusive rocks, sedimentary layers, faults, and mineral deposits (or mineral occurrences) collected through on-site surveys and 1:200,000 scale mapping. The geochemical data of river sediment obtained at a ratio of 1:1,000,000 was collected from the China National Geochemical Mapping (CNGM) project. The raw geochemical data includes 38 major and trace elements. Determine the concentrations of Bi, Cd, Co, Cu, La, Mo, Nb, Pb, Th, U, and W elements using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) (ICP-MS). Measure the concentrations of Al, Cr, Fe, K, P, Si, Ti, and Zr using X-ray fluorescence (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) (XRF) spectroscopy. Determine the concentrations of Ba, Be, Ca, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Sr, V, and Zn using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) (ICP-AES). Measure the concentrations of Ag, B, and Sn using emission spectroscopy (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) (ES). Use hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry (Beijing Haiguang Instrument, Beijing, China) (HG-AFS) to determine the concentrations of As and Sb. The concentrations of Au, Hg, and F were determined using graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) (GF-AAS), cold-vapor atomic fluorescence spectroscopy (Beijing Haiguang Instrument, Beijing, China) (CV-AFS), and ion selective electrode (Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland) (ISE) techniques, respectively. Table 1 lists the detection limits for 38 elements.

2.2. Overall Framework of the Method

Geochemical anomaly extraction is complicated by multiple interfering factors: the closure effect inherent to compositional data, extreme value disturbance in statistical calculations, and the spatial heterogeneity of ore-related geochemical signals. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a hybrid-driven framework that integrates compositional data processing, robust statistics and spatial structure analysis. This framework is established on the basis of compositional data analysis. As a fundamental feature of compositional data, the closure effect exerts a strong influence on major oxide data with percentage contents, whereas its influence on trace elements (mg/kg) is negligible. Given that our dataset contains a complete suite of major oxides and trace elements, the isometric log-ratio (ILR) transformation is adopted to eliminate compositional closure bias for the entire dataset. Subsequently, we combine the variation matrix and robust principal component analysis (RPCA) to determine stable elemental assemblages. Local indicators of spatial association (LISAs) are used to constrain spatial characteristics of geochemical data. Finally, sequential binary partitioning (SBP) is utilized to build compositional balances, which support the quantitative recognition of geochemical anomalies.
The overall technical workflow is illustrated in Figure 4 and can be summarized into four key steps: data preprocessing, identification of elemental associations, spatial structural constraint, and balance construction with anomaly detection.

2.3. Component Constraint Processing: ILR Transformation

Geochemical data represent typical compositional data, in which individual components are constrained by a constant sum, giving rise to the “closure effect,” which can easily lead to spurious correlations among variables. To eliminate this issue, the isometric log-ratio (ILR) transformation was applied to map the original data from the simplex space to the Euclidean space [5].
il r x = z i = i i + 1 · log i j = 1 i x j x i + 1 , i = 1 , , D 1
The ILR transformation constructs an orthonormal basis to convert the original compositional variables into a set of mutually independent balance variables, thereby satisfying the requirement of variable independence in multivariate statistical analysis. At the same time, this transformation can effectively improve the skewness of the data distribution, thereby providing a reliable data foundation for subsequent analyses [5].

2.4. Element Combination Identification

Understanding elemental associations is crucial for identifying geochemical processes related to mineralization. The variation matrix proposed by Aitchison is used to quantify the variability of log-ratios between element pairs; lower variation values indicate stronger associations between elements [20,31]. The variation matrix helps reveal potential mineralization-related associations among groups of elements exhibiting similar geochemical behavior. These associations provide a geochemical basis for constructing compositional balances.
Geochemical data often contain outliers resulting from mineralization processes or analytical noise. Traditional principal component analysis (PCA) is highly sensitive to such outliers, which may distort the intrinsic structure of the data. To overcome this limitation, robust principal component analysis (RPCA) [32,33] was employed. This method decomposes the dataset into two components: a low-rank structure and sparse noise.
This approach enhances the stability of principal components and enables the identification of key geochemical patterns associated with mineralization processes. The principal components derived from RPCA are subsequently used to identify major geochemical associations and to guide the construction of the balance dendrogram.

2.5. Spatial Structure Constraints: LISA Analysis

Geochemical anomalies are not only manifested through elemental association patterns but also exhibit significant spatial distribution characteristics. To incorporate spatial information constraints, local indicators of spatial association (LISAs) were employed to analyze the spatial autocorrelation of the major elements [22,34]. The Moran’s I index of local spatial association can be expressed as follows [34]:
I i = x i X ¯ S i 2 j = 1 , i j n w i , j x j X ¯
In this expression, xi denotes the value of attribute i, X ¯ represents the mean of the corresponding attribute, and wi,j denotes the spatial weight matrix between features i and j. S i 2 can be expressed as follows [34]:
S i 2 = j = 1 , j i n x j X ¯ 2 n 1
LISAs can identify local spatial clustering patterns, including high–high (HH) clusters, low–low (LL) clusters, and spatial outliers (HL and LH) [35,36,37]. Among these, high–high clusters are typically closely associated with mineralization processes.
Through LISA analysis of key elements (such as Cu, Cr, and Ni), the spatial distribution consistency and structural control characteristics can be evaluated, thereby providing spatial constraints for subsequent balance construction.

2.6. Balance Building and Anomaly Identification: SBP and CoBA

Under the combined influence of elemental associations and spatial constraints, a compositional balance system was constructed using sequential binary partitioning (SBP) [38]. Sequential binary partitioning (SBP) converts a multielement system into a set of balance variables with clear geological significance by progressively dividing the elements into binary groups. By quantitatively analyzing the relationships among components within the two groups [39], a specific balance dendrogram is constructed to investigate the compositional relationships among variables and their spatial distribution patterns. Through visualized data processing, intuitive geological interpretation can be achieved. The mathematical expression is given as follows:
w i = r i + × s i r i + + s i ln g i x i + g i x i ,
wi: the i-th compositional balance score, representing the relative enrichment of ore-forming elements versus background elements; ri: number of elements in the positive partition (ore-forming group) at the i-th binary split; si−: number of elements in the negative partition (background group) at the i-th binary split; gi(xi+) geometric mean of element concentrations in the positive partition at the i-th split; gi(xi−): geometric mean of element concentrations in the negative partition at the i-th split; the square root term is a normalization factor to ensure variance comparability across different splits.
Based on the constructed balance variables, geochemical anomaly identification was carried out using the compositional balance analysis (CoBA) method [40,41,42]. Compared with traditional approaches based on single elements or simple element combinations, balance variables can comprehensively reflect the relative relationships among multiple elements, thereby enhancing the stability of anomaly identification and the capability for geological interpretation.
Finally, by comparing the proposed approach with conventional methods (such as RPCA and element overlay), its advantages in anomaly identification performance and spatial consistency were evaluated. The CoDA biplot was visualized using the open-source R package robCompositions (version 2.4.2) [16]. The CoDaPack software (version 2.03.06) was an important tool used in this study for compositional balance analysis, including the construction of sequential binary partitions (SBP s) and the visualization of balance dendrograms [43,44].
Compared with traditional approaches, this framework integrates compositional constraints, statistical constraints, and spatial constraints into a unified system, thereby simultaneously enhancing both robustness and interpretability.

3. Results

3.1. Element Combination Feature Recognition

Of the 38 analyzed elements (7 major oxides and 31 trace elements), 11 elements (Cu, Cr, Ni, Co, V, Ti, As, Sb, Pb, Hg, Au) were selected for subsequent compositional analysis based on three quantitative criteria:
Metallogenic relevance: Spearman correlation analysis shows (Figure 5) that Cu has extremely strong positive correlations with V (r = 0.757), Co (r = 0.744), Ni (r = 0.679), Cr (r = 0.654), and Ti (r = 0.659) (all p < 0.01), which are established indicator elements for copper mineralization in the Eastern Tianshan Orogen.
Noise reduction for anomaly detection: Major oxides with strong positive correlations with Cu (e.g., Fe2O3, MgO) are affected by both ore-forming processes and non-ore-forming geological factors, which would introduce significant background noise and dilute weak mineralization signals if included in the core analysis. Major oxides with strong negative correlations with Cu (e.g., SiO2, Na2O) are the main source of terrigenous clastic dilution effects, which have been fully controlled and eliminated by the isometric log-ratio (ILR) transformation and robust PCA (RPCA) denoising steps in our methodological framework, without the need to include them as analytical variables.
Auxiliary indicator supplement: As, Sb, Pb, Hg, and Au were included as auxiliary indicators of hydrothermal activity, which are widely used in regional geochemical exploration for copper deposits in the study area.
Tectonic and magmatic context: The Eastern Tianshan is a Paleozoic island arc system with extensive arc-related magmatism. Cu and Ni are compatible elements that are enriched in mafic–ultramafic intrusions, while Cr is a common accessory mineral in these rocks. The spatial correlation of Cu–Cr–Ni anomalies with these intrusions indicates a magmatic source for the metals.
Hydrothermal processes: During the late stages of magmatic evolution, hydrothermal fluids exsolved from the intrusions leached Cu from the source rocks and precipitated it in favorable structural sites, forming porphyry and skarn copper deposits. The association reflects both the magmatic source and the hydrothermal mobilization of copper.
Regional exploration significance: The Cu–Cr–Ni anomalies are consistent with the known distribution of copper deposits in the study area, suggesting that this element assemblage is a robust indicator for copper mineralization in the Eastern Tianshan.
To identify key elemental associations related to mineralization, the variation matrix (Table 2) was first calculated based on the ILR-transformed data. The results indicate that Cu, Cr, and Ni exhibit relatively high variation values with respect to other elements, suggesting that their geochemical behavior is relatively independent and may reflect specific mineralization processes.
Detection limits for all elements are defined by the national standard for regional geochemical mapping. A total of 560 samples were involved in this work. Statistical results show (Table 3) that Au, Co, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, Sb, Ti and V have no samples with concentrations below LOD. The proportion of censored samples is 0.18% for As and 1.96% for Cr. The extremely low fraction of left-censored data indicates that LOD/2 substitution adopted in the official database will not distort the intrinsic compositional structure. Before ILR transformation and subsequent analysis, we retained all samples and used the preset LOD/2 values for censored data. Multiple comparative tests further confirmed the stability and reliability of the processed dataset.
The distribution characteristics of the traditional Cu–Cr–Ni contrast additive index and the proposed compositional balance index were analyzed using EDA density histograms and Q-Q plots (Figure 6). The traditional index shows a severely right-skewed distribution (skewness = 14.6) with a wide value range and a large number of extreme outliers, which seriously violates the normality assumption of multivariate statistical analysis (Figure 6a,c). In contrast, the compositional balance index obtained by the proposed multi-constraint framework shows an approximately perfect normal distribution (skewness = 0.26, kurtosis = −0.36), with a concentrated value range and no significant extreme outliers (Figure 6b,d). The Q-Q plot further confirms that the balance index almost completely fits the standard normal distribution, which fully satisfies the statistical premise of subsequent PCA and spatial statistical analysis, and ensures the reliability and accuracy of the geochemical anomaly detection results.
Further analysis of element loading characteristics using RPCA (Figure 7) shows that Cu, Cr, and Ni exhibit consistent positive loadings in the principal component space and contribute significantly to the same principal component, indicating a stable co-variation relationship among the three elements in a statistical sense. This consistency suggests that they may originate from the same or similar geological processes [41].
The principal component biplot (Figure 6) shows an obvious separation between the mafic element group (Cu–Cr–Ni) and hydrothermal alteration elements, which can be well explained by the regional superimposed metallogenic characteristics.
The Cu–Cr–Ni assemblage is derived from Late Paleozoic mafic–ultramafic magmatism and the Mozbaysay continental intrusion, belonging to primary magmatic Ni-Cu sulfide mineralization formed by magmatic liquation.
In addition, regional geological reports record that non-ferrous metal deposits in the study area are mainly medium–low-temperature hydrothermal veins and composite vein-type orebodies, which are products of later tectonic–hydrothermal activities. These hydrothermal veins correspond to the hydrothermal alteration elements in the figure.
Two independent metallogenic systems with different formation ages and material sources coexist in the study area, resulting in the spatial separation of element groups on the biplot. This metallogenic type is obviously different from the conventional porphyry hydrothermal system dominated by single-stage high-temperature fluid activity. Based on the latitude and longitude of the sampling points, a k-nearest-neighbor (k = 12) spatial weight matrix was constructed, and the spatial neighborhood range of each sampling point was defined. Based on this, the local Moran’s I index of each sample was calculated to identify four types of spatial clustering units: high–high (HH), high–low (HL), low–high (LH), and low–low (LL). This step achieves the coupling of “component data features” and “spatial autocorrelation features” by incorporating spatial coordinates, filters out isolated random outliers, and preserves mineralization-related anomalies with spatial continuity, providing spatial constraints for subsequent component balance analysis.
At the spatial scale, the LISA analysis results (Figure 8) indicate that Cu, Cr, and Ni all exhibit significant high–high (HH) clustering characteristics, with highly consistent spatial distributions that are mainly aligned along the N–S-trending structural belt. Previous studies have shown that copper mineralization in the East Tianshan Mountains is often associated with Cu, Cr, Ni, Co, V, Ti, As, Sb, Pb, Hg, and Au. Therefore, 11 indicator elements for mineralization were selected for subsequent analysis. These results indicate that the three elements are not only statistically correlated but also exhibit coordinated spatial distribution enrichment and are controlled by regional tectonic structures.
By integrating the results of the variation matrix, RPCA, and LISA analyses, Cu–Cr–Ni can be identified as the principal mineralization-related elemental association in the study area.

3.2. Composition Balance Characteristics and Data Structure Optimization

Based on the identified elemental association, a compositional balance system was constructed using sequential binary partitioning (SBP) (Table 4). Among these, balance b2 (Cu–Cr–Ni) was selected as the key variable representing mineralization processes [37,45].
The statistical analysis results (Figure 9) indicate that, compared with the original elemental combinations, the data distribution of balance b2 is significantly improved. Specifically, the skewness and kurtosis are significantly reduced and the data distribution shifts from a strongly skewed pattern to an approximately symmetric distribution, indicating that the influence of extreme values on the data structure has been effectively suppressed.
In addition, the balance variable exhibits greater stability at the overall scale, with a more concentrated value range, which helps to highlight anomalous signals and reduce background noise interference. This indicates that the CoBA method can optimize the geochemical data structure through balance construction, thereby improving the reliability of subsequent anomaly identification.

3.3. Geochemical Anomaly Identification Results

Spatial interpolation and anomaly extraction based on balance b2 were performed to obtain the geochemical anomaly distribution pattern in the study area. The geochemical anomaly maps of the above balances were visualized using ArcGIS Pro™ 3.1, and spatial interpolation was carried out using the inverse distance weighting (IDW) method.
The specific parameter settings are as follows: the distance power value is set to 2; the neighborhood search method selects a variable search radius, and each interpolation unit selects 12 nearest-neighbor sampling points in the surrounding area; the output grid pixel size is 1000 m; and areas outside the sampling range are filled using the software’s default extrapolation method.
The results (Figure 10) show that the anomalous zones are mainly distributed in a belt-like pattern, extending overall in an east–west direction and forming high-intensity anomaly centers in localized areas. Compared with the original element overlay method (Figure 10a), the anomalies identified based on balance b2 (Figure 10b) exhibit the following significant characteristics:
(1)
The anomaly distribution is more continuous, with a clearer spatial structure;
(2)
Background noise is significantly reduced, and anomaly boundaries are more distinct;
(3)
The distribution of anomaly intensity is more balanced, avoiding results dominated by local extreme values.
Further comparison with the RPCA principal component results (Figure 10c) shows that the anomalous zones identified by the CoBA method are more spatially concentrated and exhibit a higher degree of correspondence with regional structures and known mineralization locations. This indicates that balance variables integrating compositional constraints and spatial information can more accurately reflect mineralization-related geochemical processes.
To demonstrate the performance of our model analysis in identifying geochemical anomalies, this paper takes the anomaly maps obtained from three element combinations as a reference. From Figure 11, it can be seen that the AUC of the Cu Cr Ni geochemical-variable anomaly maps (Figure 10a), b2 (Figure 10b) and PCA2 (Figure 10c) based on the inverse distance weighting method are 0.7755, 0.8367, and 0.4898, respectively, which are higher than those based on the Kriging method. The AUC of the anomaly map obtained from big data analysis is larger, indicating that it is a more powerful tool for correctly extracting important multivariate geochemical anomalies.
The performance of the IDW and Ordinary Kriging interpolation methods was quantitatively evaluated using three metrics: root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination R2. The results are shown in Table 5. The IDW method achieved a significantly lower RMSE and MAE, along with a much higher R2, indicating its superior performance in capturing the spatial variability of the geochemical data. The weaker performance of Kriging may be attributed to the weak spatial autocorrelation structure in the dataset, which limits the effectiveness of methods relying on spatial dependence. Based on this validation, IDW was selected as the primary interpolation method for generating the final geochemical anomaly maps.

3.4. Division and Verification of Metallogenic Prospect Areas

Based on the distribution characteristics of the geochemical anomalies and in combination with the regional geological background, five mineral-prospecting target areas were delineated in the study area (Figure 12), including two Class I targets, two Class II targets, and one Class III target. The field verification results are shown in Table 6.
The copper content of exposed bedrock in the I-1 area is 0.5%–1.3%, with an average of about 0.85%.
The copper content in the exposed bedrock of the I-2 area ranges from 0.5% to 1.0%, with an average of about 0.75%; both meet or exceed the industrial grade for sulfide ores (0.4%–0.5%).
The ore bodies are predominantly hydrothermal vein-type, with mineral assemblages including chalcopyrite, bornite, and malachite. Well-developed wall-rock alteration is observed, indicating favorable mineralization conditions in the area. Among them, the Class I targets (I-1 and I-2) exhibit the strongest anomaly responses and show a high degree of correspondence with fault structures and known mineralization sites. Although the Class II and Class III target areas exhibit relatively weaker anomaly intensities, they still display distinct Cu–Cr–Ni association characteristics and thus possess potential for further exploration.

4. Discussion

4.1. Geochemical Significance of Ore-Forming Element Assemblages

The variation matrix and RPCA results indicate that Cu, Cr, and Ni exhibit strong associations, suggesting a common geochemical origin [31,41,42]. These elements are commonly associated with mafic and ultramafic rocks, which are widely distributed in the Eastern Tianshan region. Their enrichment may reflect magmatic differentiation processes or hydrothermal fluid activity associated with mineralization. The spatial clusters identified by the LISAs further corroborate the geological significance of these elemental associations, as the high–high clusters coincide with the locations of known mineralization belts [22,34]. In addition, this elemental association is spatially concentrated along the N–S-trending structural belt, indicating that tectonic activity played a key role in controlling the migration and enrichment of ore-forming materials.

4.2. Innovativeness and Effectiveness of Multi-Method Coupling Framework

The multi-method analytical framework integrating RPCA, LISAs, and CoBA constructed in this study achieves a complete workflow of “Element identification” + “Spatial verification” + “Anomaly extraction”. Compared with traditional approaches, this framework presents the following innovations: First, RPCA identifies elemental associations in the ILR-transformed geochemical data, thereby avoiding the interference of outliers with the results. Second, LISA analysis verifies the rationality of these elemental associations from a spatial perspective, enabling the results to possess geological spatial significance. Finally, the CoBA method extracts anomalies through compositional balances, achieving a unified representation of statistical and spatial information. This triple-constraint mechanism integrating “Statistical” + “Spatial” + “Compositional” information ensures that anomaly identification no longer relies on a single method but is instead based on multidimensional consistency, thereby significantly improving the reliability of the results.
Compared with original element overlay or principal component analysis methods, the approach proposed in this study demonstrates clear advantages in geochemical anomaly identification. Specifically, traditional methods often suffer from dispersed anomalies, indistinct boundaries, and results dominated by local extreme values. In contrast, the methodological framework developed in this study can: (1) improve the continuity and integrity of anomalous zones; and (2) integrate multielement information through balance variables, thereby enhancing the expression of mineralization signals, reducing background noise interference, and clarifying anomaly boundaries.
The mineral-prospecting target areas delineated based on the method proposed in this study show a high degree of spatial correspondence with known mineralization sites. Field verification results further indicate that the Class I targets have reached industrial-grade levels, demonstrating that this method has strong practical applicability in mineral exploration.

5. Conclusions

Based on compositional data analysis theory and spatial statistical methods, this study established a multi-method coupled framework integrating “RPCA” + “LISA” + “CoBA” to systematically analyze geochemical data from the Eastern Tianshan region of Xinjiang, leading to the following main conclusions:
(1)
Core research findings
Based on correlation analysis and regional metallogenic background, 11 indicative elements closely related to local mineralization were screened out. The results show that the Cu–Cr–Ni elemental assemblage effectively records regional magmatic activity, hydrothermal processes and tectonic evolution. Quantitative evaluation via RMSE, ROC-AUC and P-A curves verifies that the IDW interpolation and the proposed hybrid framework possess high accuracy and strong capability for anomaly recognition.
(2)
Methodological innovation and value
Different from conventional single statistical methods, this framework combines robust statistics, spatial constraints and compositional data analysis. It solves the problems of non-normal distribution, closure effect and spatial heterogeneity of the geochemical data. The complete technical workflow provides a referable technical route for geochemical anomaly extraction in similar mineralized areas.
(3)
Regional geological implications
The identified geochemical anomalies are highly coupled with known mineral occurrences. The spatial distribution of anomalies further confirms that regional mineralization is jointly controlled by mafic–ultramafic magmatism, multi-stage hydrothermal activity and regional tectonics. The research results offer practical support for further mineral prospecting in the East Tianshan area.
(4)
Limitations and future perspectives
This study mainly focuses on element geochemical characteristics. Subsequent research can combine rock petrology, isotope geochemistry and drilling data to deepen the understanding of metallogenic regularity. In addition, the framework can be optimized and popularized for geochemical exploration in other complex geological regions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.L., J.W., K.Z., Q.Q., S.Z. and Z.Z.; methodology, T.L. and C.L.; validation, T.L.; formal analysis, T.L.; investigation, T.L., J.B. and Q.Z.; resources, J.W. and K.Z.; data curation, T.L., W.W., C.Z., Y.B., D.L., H.Q., X.M. and G.J.; writing—original draft preparation, T.L.; writing—review and editing, J.W.; supervision, J.W., J.B. and K.Z.; project administration, J.W.; funding acquisition, J.W., W.W. and J.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by The Key Research and Development Program of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (Project No. 2025B03007-3); The Key Research and Development Program of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China (2024B03008-2) and The Xinjiang Talent Development Fund (Project No. XJRC-2025-KJ-PY-KJLJ-001).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Pawlowsky-Glahn, V.; Egozcue, J.J.; Tolosana-Delgado, R. Modeling and Analysis of Compositional Data; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Filzmoser, P.; Hron, K.; Reimann, C. Interpretation of multivariate outliers for compositional data. Comput. Geosci. 2012, 39, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Grunsky, E. Practical Aspects of Compositional Data Analysis Using Regional Geochemical Survey Data; Geological Survey of Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bacon-Shone, J. Compositional Data Analysis: Theory and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  5. Egozcue, J.J.; Pawlowsky-Glahn, V.; Mateu-Figueras, G.; Barcelo-Vidal, C. Isometric logratio transformations for compositional data analysis. Math. Geol. 2003, 35, 279–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Reimann, C.; Filzmoser, P.; Hron, K.; Garrett, R.G. A new method for correlation analysis of compositional (environmental) data—A worked example. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 607–608, 965–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Egozcue, J.J.; Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. Groups of parts and their balances in compositional data analysis. Math. Geol. 2005, 37, 795–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Thió-Henestrosa, S.; Egozcue, J.J.; Pawlowsky-Glahn, V.; Kovács, L.Ó.; Kovács, G.P. Balance-dendrogram: A new routine of CoDaPack. Comput. Geosci. 2008, 34, 1682–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mou, N.; Wang, G.; Sun, X. Identification of geochemical anomalies related to mineralization: A case study from porphyry copper deposits in the Qulong–Jiama mining district of Tibet, China. J. Geochem. Explor. 2022, 217, 106594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Y. How to determine the optimal balance for geochemical pattern recognition and anomaly mapping based on compositional balance analysis. Geochem. Explor. Environ. Anal. 2022, 22, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, Y.; Xia, Q.; Cheng, Q. Aeromagnetic and geochemical signatures in the Chinese Western Tianshan: Implications for tectonic setting and mineral exploration. Nat. Resour. Res. 2021, 30, 3165–3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zheng, W.; Liu, B.; McKinley, J.M.; Zhao, Z.; Zhou, J.; Li, J. Geology and geochemistry-based metallogenic exploration model for the eastern Tethys Himalayan metallogenic belt, Tibet. J. Geochem. Explor. 2021, 224, 106743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, L.; Liu, B.; McKinley, J.M.; Zhao, Z.; Zhou, J. Compositional data analysis of regional geochemical data in the Lhasa area of Tibet, China. Appl. Geochem. 2021, 132, 105108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Reimann, C.; Filzmoser, P.; Garrett, R.G. Statistical Data Analysis Explained; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2008; Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470987605.
  15. Zuo, R.; Carranza, E.J.M.; Wang, J. Spatial analysis and visualization of exploration geochemical data. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2016, 158, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, C.; Zhou, K.; Gao, W.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y. Geochemical prospectivity mapping using compositional balance analysis and multifractal modeling: A case study in the Jinshuikou area, Qinghai, China. J. Geochem. Explor. 2024, 257, 107361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Puchhammer, P.; Kalubowila, C.; Braus, L. A performance study of local outlier detection methods for mineral exploration with geochemical compositional data. J. Geochem. Explor. 2024, 258, 107392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Candès, E.J.; Li, X.; Ma, Y.; Wright, J. Robust principal component analysis? J. ACM 2011, 58, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vidal, R.; Ma, Y.; Sastry, S.S. Robust Principal Component Analysis; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  20. Filzmoser, P. Robust principal component and factor analysis in the geostatistical treatment of environmental data. Environmetrics 1999, 10, 363–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Anselin, L. Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geogr. Anal. 1995, 27, 93–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Symanzik, J. Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis. In Handbook of Regional Science; Fischer, M.M., Nijkamp, P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xiao, W.J.; Qin, K.Z.; Sun, S.; Li, J.L. Paleozoic accretionary and collisional tectonics of the Eastern Tianshan (China): Implications for the continental growth of Central Asia. Am. J. Sci. 2004, 304, 370–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hu, J.; Yu, X.; Zeng, Y.; Xiao, W.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y. Structural evolution of the Kanggur tectonic belt: Implications for the latest Carboniferous to Permian orogeny in the Eastern Tianshan, NW China. Int. Geol. Rev. 2021, 63, 2001–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jiang, C.; Wu, W.; Li, L.; Mu, Y.; Bai, K.; Zhao, X. Tectonic Evolution of the Eastern Southern Tianshan Mountain; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2001; p. 96. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Regional Geology of Xinjiang Autonomous Region; Geological Memoirs, Ser. 1, No. 32; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1993; p. 841. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jiang, C.; Mu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Bai, K.; Zhang, H. Petrology and geochemistry of the intrusion belt along the northern active margin of the Tarim plate. Reg. Geol. China 2001, 20, 158–163. [Google Scholar]
  28. Guo, Q.Q.; Chung, S.L.; Xiao, W.J.; Li, X.H.; Yuan, C.; He, Z.J. Petrogenesis and tectonic implications of Late Devonian arc volcanic rocks in Southern Beishan Orogen, NW China. Lithos 2017, 278–281, 84–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Şengör, A.M.C.; Natal’in, B.A.; Burtman, V.S. Evolution of the Altaid tectonic collage and Paleozoic crustal growth in Eurasia. Nature 1993, 364, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Windley, B.F.; Alexeiev, D.; Xiao, W.J.; Kroner, A.; Badarch, G. Tectonic models for accretion of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. J. Geol. Soc. 2007, 164, 31–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Y.; Zhou, K.; Carranza, E.J.M. Compositional balance analysis for geochemical pattern recognition and anomaly mapping in the western Junggar region, China. Geochem. Explor. Environ. Anal. 2018, 18, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zuo, R. Identification of geochemical anomalies associated with mineralization in the Fanshan district, Fujian, China. J. Geochem. Explor. 2014, 139, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zuo, R.; Xia, Q.; Wang, H. Compositional data analysis in the study of integrated geochemical anomalies associated with mineralization. Appl. Geochem. 2013, 28, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Anselin, L. Interactive Techniques and Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis. In Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Management and Applications, 2nd ed.; Longley, P., Goodchild, M., Maguire, D., Rhind, D., Eds.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1999; pp. 253–266. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zuo, R.; Xiong, Y. Geodata Science and Geochemical Mapping; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, J.; Zuo, R. Identification of geochemical anomalies through combined sequential Gaussian simulation and grid-based local singularity analysis. Comput. Geosci. 2018, 118, 52–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pawlowsky-Glahn, V.; Egozcue, J.J.; Tolosana-Delgado, R. Principal balances. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Compositional Data Analysis, Santander, Spain, 6–11 June 2011; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  38. Yin, B.; Zuo, R.; Xiong, Y.; Li, Y.; Yang, W. Knowledge discovery of geochemical patterns from a data-driven perspective. J. Geochem. Explor. 2021, 231, 106872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pawlowsky-Glahn, V.; Egozcue, J.J. Exploring compositional data with the CoDa-dendrogram. Aust. J. Stat. 2011, 40, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Filzmoser, P.; Hron, K.; Reimann, C. Principal component analysis for compositional data with outliers. Environmetrics 2009, 20, 621–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aitchison, J.; Greenacre, M. Biplots of compositional data. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C Appl. Stat. 2002, 51, 375–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Graffelman, J.; Pawlowsky-Glahn, V.; Egozcue, J.J.; Buccianti, A. Exploration of geochemical data with compositional canonical biplots. J. Geochem. Explor. 2018, 194, 120–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Comas-Cufí, M.; Thió-Henestrosa, S. CoDaPack 2.0; Universitat de Girona: Girona, Spain, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu, Y.; Carranza, E.J.M.; Zhou, K.; Xia, Q. Compositional balance analysis: An elegant method of geochemical pattern recognition and anomaly mapping for mineral exploration. Nat. Resour. Res. 2019, 28, 1269–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zuo, R. Data-driven modeling of mineral prospectivity. In Handbook of Exploration and Environmental Geochemistry; Holland, H.D., Turekian, K.K., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; Volume 11, pp. 249–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geological map of the Eastern Tianshan Mountains in China.
Figure 1. Geological map of the Eastern Tianshan Mountains in China.
Minerals 16 00694 g001
Figure 2. Geological map of the study area.
Figure 2. Geological map of the study area.
Minerals 16 00694 g002
Figure 3. Map of stream sediment sampling sites in Balikun Lake.
Figure 3. Map of stream sediment sampling sites in Balikun Lake.
Minerals 16 00694 g003
Figure 4. Workflow of CoBA for geochemical pattern recognition and anomaly mapping to support mineral exploration.
Figure 4. Workflow of CoBA for geochemical pattern recognition and anomaly mapping to support mineral exploration.
Minerals 16 00694 g004
Figure 5. Spearman correlation matrix of key ore-forming elements (r > 0.5 with Cu).
Figure 5. Spearman correlation matrix of key ore-forming elements (r > 0.5 with Cu).
Minerals 16 00694 g005
Figure 6. The EDA and Q–Q plots of the Cu–Cr–Ni contrast additive (a,c), and our result (balance b2) dataset (b,d). The red line in the Q–Q plots represents the standard normal distribution reference line.
Figure 6. The EDA and Q–Q plots of the Cu–Cr–Ni contrast additive (a,c), and our result (balance b2) dataset (b,d). The red line in the Q–Q plots represents the standard normal distribution reference line.
Minerals 16 00694 g006
Figure 7. RPCA (PC1 and PC2) biplot of stream sediment geochemistry data of ILR transformation types for elements in the study area.
Figure 7. RPCA (PC1 and PC2) biplot of stream sediment geochemistry data of ILR transformation types for elements in the study area.
Minerals 16 00694 g007
Figure 8. Cluster and outlier analysis of (a) Cu, (b) Cr, (c) Ni.
Figure 8. Cluster and outlier analysis of (a) Cu, (b) Cr, (c) Ni.
Minerals 16 00694 g008
Figure 9. Balance tree diagram for the sequential binary partition model in Table 2.
Figure 9. Balance tree diagram for the sequential binary partition model in Table 2.
Minerals 16 00694 g009
Figure 10. Geochemical anomalies identified (a) Cu–Cr–Ni, (b) b2, (c) PC2. Cu–Cr–Ni anomaly zones A1–A3, balanced b2 anomaly zones B1–B3, and PCA2 anomaly zones C1–C3. The color scale represents the intensity of the compositional balance value, with blue indicating background values and red indicating high anomaly intensity.
Figure 10. Geochemical anomalies identified (a) Cu–Cr–Ni, (b) b2, (c) PC2. Cu–Cr–Ni anomaly zones A1–A3, balanced b2 anomaly zones B1–B3, and PCA2 anomaly zones C1–C3. The color scale represents the intensity of the compositional balance value, with blue indicating background values and red indicating high anomaly intensity.
Minerals 16 00694 g010
Figure 11. Comparison of ROC of the anomaly map.
Figure 11. Comparison of ROC of the anomaly map.
Minerals 16 00694 g011
Figure 12. Prospecting prediction targets and engineering verification map of the study area.
Figure 12. Prospecting prediction targets and engineering verification map of the study area.
Minerals 16 00694 g012
Table 1. Detection limits of 38 elements.
Table 1. Detection limits of 38 elements.
No.ElementsDetection LimitNo.ElementsDetection LimitNo.ElementsDetection Limit
1Ag0.0214La3027U0.5
2As115Li528V20
3Au0.000316Mn3029W0.5
4B517Mo0.430Zn10
5Ba5018Nb531Zr10
6Be0.519Ni232SiO20.10%
7Bi0.120P10033Al2O30.10%
8Cd0.0521Pb234Fe2O30.05%
9Co122Sb0.135MgO0.05%
10Cr1523Sn136CaO0.05%
11Cu124Sr537Na2O0.05%
12F10025Th438K2O0.05%
13Hg0.000526Ti100
Table 2. Variation matrix of geochemical elements.
Table 2. Variation matrix of geochemical elements.
CuCrNiCoTiVAsAuHgPbSb
Cu00.190.140.090.110.080.390.440.230.200.43
Cr 00.070.110.200.150.710.620.420.360.72
Ni 00.050.130.110.640.570.360.280.65
Co 00.060.040.530.500.280.210.55
Ti 00.020.430.400.200.150.44
V 00.440.450.230.220.46
As 00.650.370.430.22
Au 00.530.360.71
Hg 00.240.34
Pb 00.44
Sb 0
Table 3. Detection limits for geochemical elements.
Table 3. Detection limits for geochemical elements.
ElementLimit of Detection LODNumber of Samples with Concentration Below LODTotal Number of Measured SamplesPercentage of Samples Below LOD (%)
Cr15115601.96
As115600.18
Au0.000305600
Co105600
Cu105600
Hg0.000505600
Ni205600
Pb205600
Sb0.105600
Ti10005600
V2005600
Table 4. Balance combinations of geochemical elements.
Table 4. Balance combinations of geochemical elements.
b1 = [Cu,Cr,Ni|V,Co,Ti,Au,Sb,As,Pb,Hg]b6 = [Ti|Co]
b2 = [Cu,Ni,Cr|V,Co,Ti]b7 = [Hg|Au,Sb,As,Pb]
b3 = [Cu|Ni,Cr]b8 = [Au,Pb|As,Sb]
b4 = [Ni|Cr]b9 = [Au|Pb]
b5 = [V|Ti,Co]b10 = [As|Sb]
Table 5. Comparison of IDW and Kriging evaluation indicators.
Table 5. Comparison of IDW and Kriging evaluation indicators.
IndexIDW InterpolationKriging Interpolation
RMSE0.2730.986
MAE0.1350.646
R20.9660.554
Table 6. Analysis results of chemical sample.
Table 6. Analysis results of chemical sample.
Sample NumberAnalysis Result
Cu Concentration (%)
I-1 (1–5)0.5%~1.3%
I-1 (6–9)0.3%~0.5%
I-1 (10–17)0.08%~0.3%
I-2 (1–6)0.5%~1%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liao, T.; Wang, J.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, Z.; Qiao, Q.; Zhou, K.; Bi, J.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Q.; Li, C.; et al. A Multi-Constraint Framework for Geochemical Anomaly Detection Based on Compositional Data Analysis and Spatial Statistics: Implications for Copper Mineralization in Eastern Tianshan. Minerals 2026, 16, 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16070694

AMA Style

Liao T, Wang J, Zhou S, Zhang Z, Qiao Q, Zhou K, Bi J, Wang W, Zhang Q, Li C, et al. A Multi-Constraint Framework for Geochemical Anomaly Detection Based on Compositional Data Analysis and Spatial Statistics: Implications for Copper Mineralization in Eastern Tianshan. Minerals. 2026; 16(7):694. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16070694

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liao, Tao, Jinlin Wang, Shuguang Zhou, Zhixin Zhang, Qingqing Qiao, Kefa Zhou, Jiantao Bi, Wei Wang, Qing Zhang, Chao Li, and et al. 2026. "A Multi-Constraint Framework for Geochemical Anomaly Detection Based on Compositional Data Analysis and Spatial Statistics: Implications for Copper Mineralization in Eastern Tianshan" Minerals 16, no. 7: 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16070694

APA Style

Liao, T., Wang, J., Zhou, S., Zhang, Z., Qiao, Q., Zhou, K., Bi, J., Wang, W., Zhang, Q., Li, C., Jiang, G., Ma, X., Bai, Y., Li, D., Zhao, C., & Qiu, H. (2026). A Multi-Constraint Framework for Geochemical Anomaly Detection Based on Compositional Data Analysis and Spatial Statistics: Implications for Copper Mineralization in Eastern Tianshan. Minerals, 16(7), 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16070694

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop