Next Article in Journal
A Review of Rare Earth Elements Resources in Africa
Previous Article in Journal
Microstructures and Anisotropy of Slates from Northern China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Formation Conditions of Early Cambrian Witherite (BaCO3) Deposit in Chongqing: Implications for Differential Oceanic Changes

1
College of Earth and Planetary Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
2
China National Logging Corporation, Xi’an 710061, China
3
PetroChina Hangzhou Research Institute of Geology, Hangzhou 310023, China
4
Key Laboratory of Carbonate Reservoirs, China National Petroleum Corporation, Hangzhou 310023, China
5
State Energy Key Laboratory for Carbonate Oil and Gas, Hangzhou 310023, China
6
State Key Laboratory of Tropical Oceanography, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China
7
Western (Chongqing) Geological Technology Innovation Research Institute, Chongqing 400030, China
8
Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510610, China
9
Institution of Meteorites and Planetary Materials Research, Key Laboratory of Planetary Geological Evolution, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
10
Tarim Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Korla 841000, China
11
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Ultra-Deep Oil and Gas, Korla 841000, China
12
Zhejiang Provincial Geological & Mineral Engineering Investigation Institute Limited Company, Hangzhou 310012, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2025, 15(9), 978; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15090978
Submission received: 21 July 2025 / Revised: 29 August 2025 / Accepted: 5 September 2025 / Published: 15 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Deposits)

Abstract

The discovery of extensive layered witherite (BaCO3) deposits in the Early Cambrian strata in South China offers valuable insights into the unique paleo-marine environment of this region. Based on stratigraphy, petrography, geochemistry, fluid inclusions, and pervious published multi-isotope geochemical analysis, we aim to explore the distinct genesis mechanism of the witherite deposits in the Chengkou area of South China and unveil the specific paleo-marine environment during their formation. This study concludes that the wide 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.708266 to 0.708504) of witherite and barytocalcite (BaCa(CO3)2) support the seawater-derived barium. Negative δ13C values (−15.6 to −12.5‰) indicate the involvement of organic matter during the formation of witherite. The complex vapor-phase (including CH4, H2S, etc.) and HS-containing liquid-phase compositions in the primary liquid–vapor inclusions of the witherite and barytocalcite imply that the two minerals are formed in sulfur-rich euxinic seawater. The broad homogenization temperatures are generated by thermal re-equilibration of the inclusions, rather than the actual temperatures of the trapped fluids. The salinity range of fluid inclusions in the Bashan witherite deposit (0.2 to 16.2 wt.%) records mixing between moderate-salinity basinal-derived fluids and low-salinity seawater-sourced fluids. We propose that the formation of Chengkou witherite deposits is linked to a sulfate-limited euxinic seawater environment, highlighting the spatiotemporal heterogeneity in Early Cambrian paleo-oceanic sulfate concentrations.

1. Introduction

The Cambrian period marks a critical moment in Earth’s history, characterized by a surge in biodiversity linked closely to marine environments [1,2,3]. Geological and biological shifts during the Ediacaran–Cambrian transition set the stage for the ‘Cambrian explosion’ [4,5]. The witherite deposit found exclusively in South China provides crucial geological evidence for understanding Cambrian marine environments. These deposits originated from the Early Cambrian and display temporal correlation and spatial specificity with the marine environment during that period [6,7]. Moreover, Barium (Ba), as a vital element of life, can accurately record variations in the chemical environment of the ocean [8,9]. An investigation of the distinctive formation mechanism of its carbonate rock assembly is essential for unraveling the intricate oceanic geochemical field [10,11].
Ba occurs naturally in the forms of barite (BaSO4) and witherite (BaCO3) minerals. Barite, as a common sulfate phase, forms in diverse geological environments such as marine basins [12], hydrothermal systems [13], and cold seep settings [14], serving as a key proxy for reconstructing paleo-oceanic conditions [15,16]. In contrast, witherite deposits represent rare carbonate-hosted barium, with economically significant occurrences restricted to discrete tectonic domains, including the Qinling-Dabashan metallogenic belt (China [7]), Pennines mineralization zones (UK [17]), and California’s Franciscan Complex (US [18]). Owing to the scarcity of witherite, present studies have concentrated on evaluating witherite deposits [7], with limited studies on the metallogenic mechanism of witherite. Recent studies on witherite deposit in the Dabashan region have started to address this gap [6,19,20,21,22], but there is still limited understanding of the ore-forming fluids and formation environments of witherite. The formation mechanism of witherite remains debated, with proposed origins including the metasomatic genesis [23], biogenic genesis [24,25], submarine hydrothermal fluids [26], and cold seeps [7]. Furthermore, the marine environment during the formation of witherite deposits and the aggregation and distribution patterns of barium in ancient seawater are still not well understood.
To address the research gaps identified, this study focuses on the globally significant Early Cambrian witherite deposit in Chengkou, Chongqing. This deposit provides valuable insights into marine environmental shifts during the Cambrian period. Our research investigates the characteristics of the ore-forming fluids and the depositional environments of witherite minerals by analyzing fluid inclusions in high-grade ores from the study area, alongside a comprehensive review of relevant isotope studies. Through this approach, we aim to clarify the distinct genesis mechanism of these deposits and offer a case study that explores the variability of marine systems during the Early Cambrian.

2. Regional and Deposit Geology

The Dabashan region, located on the northeastern margin of the Sichuan Craton Basin, is divided into the South Dabashan and North Dabashan tectonic units by the Chengkou-Zhongbao fault [25]. The North Dabashan belongs to the Yangtze platform and experienced stages of extension and tectonic inversion, resulting in the formation of plow-type normal faults and thrust fault tectonics. In the Early Paleozoic, sedimentation was governed by thrust faults, leading to substantial variations in stratigraphic thickness. Following tectonic inversion, the North Dabashan area was characterized by ductile slip and brittle thrust faults. Several large-scale barium mineralization belts have formed this area, and multiple deposits are distributed therein (such as the Ziyang-Huangboshuwan deposit, Chengkou-Bashan deposit, Wanyuan-Miaozi deposit, etc.). Liu et al. (2010) further subdivided the North Dabashan large-scale barium mineralization belt into barite and witherite mineralization sub-zones based on systematic variations in mineral assemblages [25]. The witherite mineralization belt is situated north of the Chengba fault, extended from Shaanxi province along the border between Sichuan and Hubei province, covering approximately 320 km (Figure 1b). These deposits occur in the cherts of the Lower Cambrian unit in a layered or apparently layered form [24].
The Chengkou-Bashan witherite deposit in Chengkou County, Chongqing is located in the Huangxi-Chengkou anticlinorium fold belt within the North Dabashan thrust zone. The area is characterized by a series of tight folds, and the fault structure is well-developed [28]. The magmatic rocks in this region, primarily composed of diabase, are predominantly of Caledonian age [7]. There are Cu, Pt, Pd, Zn, Pb, Sb, Mo, and Ni and other metal mineralization abnormalities in the mining area. Exposed strata include the Baziping Formation (Zb), Bashan Formation (Є1b), Liujiaping Formation (Є1l), Jianzhuba Formation (Є1j), Maobaguan Formation (Є2m), Baguamiao Formation (Є2b), and other marine platform carbonate formation and continental shelf siliceous rock-clastic formation sequences. The Baziping Formation (Zb), upper unit of the Sinian specific to Chinese stratigraphy, consists of dolomite with minor lenticular siderite at the bottom, limestone at the intermediate part, and black chert at the top [26]. The Chengkou-Bashan deposit is hosted in the black, thin-layered carbonaceous chert of the Bashan Formation. It consists of chert, siliceous shale, and carbonaceous shale from bottom to top, and orebodies are bedded/stratiform or stratiform-like and lenses strictly controlled by the stratum (Figure 1c). The predominant ore mineralogy in the Chengkou-Bashan deposit is witherite, accompanied by barytocalcite and barite. Gangue minerals mainly include pyrite, quartz, calcite, and organic matter. The deposit is characterized by obvious sedimentation or sedimentation-transformation, which is mainly transformed by later tectonic movements, causing the ore body to be cut and shifted or deformed and reversed (Figure 2a,b).
According to the characteristics of rock assemblage, the Bashan Formation is divided into two lithological sections, which are described separately as follows: the first section of the Bashan Formation (Є1b1) has a thickness of 84.12 m. The lower part consists of gray-black thin-layered carbonaceous chert interbedded with gray fine-grained limestone lenticular bodies, which are intermittently distributed along the strata with spacing of 20–30 cm. The middle part is characterized by black thin-layered to massive chert, exhibiting cryptocrystalline texture with massive, striped, or banded structures (Figure 2c,d). The upper part contains thin to thick-layered massive chert interbedded with thin-layered slate, with a total thickness of 24.94 m.
The second section (Є1b2) ranges from 31.85 to 46.46 m in thickness and hosts the witherite (BaCO3) orebody. The primary lithology includes black thin-layered chert, carbonaceous shale, and carbon-siliceous shale, intercalated with witherite ore. The stratifications are irregular, showing fold structures and ‘S’-shaped twists (Figure 2e,f). The lower part is composed of black thin-layered siliceous shale and carbonaceous siliceous shale, with individual layers ranging from 1 to 8 cm in thickness. The middle and upper parts host the witherite orebody. The witherite orebody varies in thickness from 0.38 to 7.79 m. Towards the eastern side of the exploration area, the witherite mineralization gradually transitions into dolomite.

3. Methods

3.1. Samples

A total of 12 representative samples, including witherite, calcite, and ore-bearing chert, were collected from the underground mine tunnel of the Chengkou witherite deposit in Chongqing, China (See Table 1). Since the organic matter content significantly influences the observation of fluid inclusions under the microscope, the samples with lower organic matter were selected for polishing thin sections.

3.2. Fluid Inclusions

The microthermometric studies and laser Raman spectra analysis of fluid inclusions were conducted at the Guangxi Key Laboratory of Exploration for Hidden Metal Mineral, Guilin University of Technology, China. Cooling and heating experiments for the low- and medium-temperature inclusions (−196 to +600 °C) were performed using a Linkam THMS 600 freezing–heating unit. The measurement accuracy varies in different temperature ranges: the estimated accuracy of temperatures is ±0.2 °C for temperatures below 31 °C and ±1 °C for temperatures greater than or equal to 31 °C. During microthermometrics, primary inclusions were chosen for testing. The heating/cooling rates are limited to 10 °C/min and were reduced to 1 to 0.1 °C/min near phase transformations.
Qualitative determinations of the compositions of individual fluid inclusions were conducted using a Renishaw RM-2000 laser Raman probe. The experimental conditions were room temperature 23 °C, and the laser light source was an argon ion laser with a wavelength of 514 nm. The counting time of the measured spectra was 30 s, counting every 1 cm−1 (wave number). The spectral range was from 1000 to 4000 cm−1, with the peaks taken at one time in the whole band. The laser beam spot size was about 1 μm, and the spectral resolution was 2 cm−1.

4. Results

4.1. Petrologic and Petrographic Characteristics

Texturally, the witherite structures include massive, laminated, lenticular, and network-like structures (Figure 3a–d), while its textures include cryptocrystalline-fine-grained, medium coarse-grained, and bundle-radial textures (Figure 3e–h).
A microscopic study indicates that the ore textures include (1) cryptocrystalline to fine-grained texture, composed of tightly packed minerals ranging from 0.01 to 0.03 mm in size, commonly observed in dense massive ore samples (Figure 3e); (2) fine- to coarse-grained inequigranular texture, where mineral grain sizes vary between 0.1 and 3 mm, distributed randomly without a clear directional structure (Figure 3h); and (3) bundled to radiating texture, where mineral crystals form clusters or radiating aggregates, with crystal sizes mostly ranging from 0.2 to 0.5 mm (Figure 3f).
The ore structures include (1) dense massive structures, formed by irregularly distributed minerals of varying sizes without a clear directional arrangement (Figure 3c); (2) laminated structures, composed of oriented microcrystalline or fine-grained minerals, displaying primary sedimentary structure, with the hand specimens showing distinct 1–2 mm laminations (Figure 3b); (3) banded to striped structures, characterized by the regular accumulation of minerals with different colors, sizes, and compositions or by the directional arrangement of carbonaceous and muddy components, with bands typically wider than 2 mm, while stripes 2–3 mm wide, and this structure associated with primary sedimentation or metasomatism (Figure 3a); and (4) network-like structures, formed by intersecting veinlets caused by post-depositional tectonic activity or magmatic intrusion, with vein widths ranging from 1 to 5 mm, often filled with calcite or quartz (Figure 3d).
Barytocalcite is gray or dark gray and belongs to the orthorhombic system. It foams vigorously when treated with 5% hydrochloric acid. Under the microscope, grains are mostly granular or tabular-columns, with crystal sizes ranging from 0.02 to 2 mm, mostly 0.5 to 1 mm. It has a pseudo-dolomite cleavage and often coexists with witherite (Figure 3i).
Barite, like the other two minerals, belongs to the orthorhombic system and has a dark gray color. Under the microscope, grains are granular, short columnar, or tabular, with a particle size ranging from 0.01 to 0.1 mm. The crystal interiors often contain carbonaceous substances. They occur in fascicular, radial, and chrysanthemum-like forms, or exhibit microlaminated and banded structures (Figure 3j). Theses minerals are generally found in carbonate-type barite ores, with higher grades in the upper part than in the lower part. They do not form a separate barite ore body.

4.2. Petrography of Fluid Inclusions

Fluid inclusions (FIs) are well preserved in witherite and barytocalcite (Table 1). According to the vapor–liquid ratio (at room temperature) and classification of FIs [29], the FIs in witherite and barytocalcite are divided into primary, pseudo-secondary, and secondary. We further classify the primary inclusions of witherite and barytocalcite into three types: L-type, V-type, and L-V-type primary FIs (Figure 4).
L-type FIs are limpid and only-liquid inclusions, which are widespread and most abundant in barytocalcite. These FIs are in the shape of elongated (Figure 4i), oval (Figure 4a–c), and negative crystal shapes (Figure 4d), with 3~8 μm in diameter. The spatial distribution is characterized by clusters, directional (Figure 4h) and sporadic (Figure 4d) in the witherite and barytocalcite.
V-type FIs are limpid and only-vapor phase with a dark border and bright light reflection in the center (Figure 4a,e). These characteristics may indicate that these bubbles might be CH4 or CO2. They are of small quantity in the two minerals. These FIs are commonly oval or sub-oval, with 2–5 μm in diameter. They occur as isolated along the direction of witherite and barytocalcite mineral cleavage (Figure 4a,e).
L-V-type FIs are limpid and liquid and vapor two-phase, aqueous inclusions (at room temperature). A vapor bubble with a dark border can be observed in each of these FIs, which homogenizes to liquid phase upon heating. This type of bubbles in these FIs may indicate the presence of CO2, so there are probably H2O-CO2 FIs, while the darker-colored border bubbles might be H2O-CH4-N2 FIs or other gas types of FIs. The proportion of the vapor phase is usually in the range 5 to 20 vol%. These FIs are commonly oval (Figure 4a,c,e), subcircular (Figure 4b), or triangular (Figure 4g), with 1 to 4 μm in diameter. They occur as isolated and scattered along the direction of the two minerals’ cleavage.

4.3. Microthermometric Results

Microthermometric studies were conducted on primary aqueous inclusions (L + V) from all the minerals in the Chengkou witherite deposit. Microthermometric data are summarized in Table 2.
Primary aqueous inclusions in witherite have ice-melting temperatures from −0.1 to −21.0 °C (n = 29), with salinities ranging from 0.2 to 23.0 wt.% NaCl equivalent, with a concentration concentrated within the range of 1 to 12 wt.% NaCl equivalent (Figure 5). The homogeneous temperatures varied from 54.2 to 162.7 °C, focused on 60 to 120 °C (Figure 5), all homogeneous to the liquid phase.
Primary aqueous inclusions in barytocalcite were homogenized to the liquid phase at temperatures of 62.3 to 185.7 °C (n = 81), focused on 60 to 140 °C, with salinity ranging from 0.2 to 16.2 wt.% NaCl equivalent (Figure 5).

4.4. Laser Raman Spectroscopy

The results of laser Raman analysis of the vapor- and liquid-phase components of representative FIs in witherite and barytocalcite show that only the peak of the mineral and broad H2O peak appears in the vapor-phase laser Raman spectrum of most inclusions (Figure 6). This indicates that the NaCl+H2O FIs are dominant in the witherite and barytocalcite. In the vapor-phase laser Raman spectra of a few inclusions with large vapor-liquid ratios, in addition to the peak of H2O and the main mineral, there are also CH4 (2914 cm−1), H2S (2592 cm−1), HS (2572 cm−1), SO2 (1151 cm−1), CO2 (1283 cm−1), and N2 (2328 cm−1). The vapor component in the pure vapor-phase inclusions of the two minerals is CH4 based on the analysis of laser Raman. The above phenomenon may be due to the relatively tiny vapor–liquid ratios of most inclusions and violent pulsation, which makes it difficult for the laser to focus on the vapor-phase components.

5. Discussion

5.1. Nature of Ore-Forming Fluids

Aqueous inclusions present in the minerals serve as valuable archives of geological history, providing insights into the composition of the ore-forming fluids [30]. The wide range of homogenization temperatures (54.2 to 185.7 °C) measured from FIs in witherite and barytocalcite in the research area (Figure 5; Table 2) may primarily reflect temperature variations of the entrapped fluids. However, several other factors could contribute to this variability, including (1) irregular operations during sampling, sample preparation, and experimentation; (2) re-equilibrium due to stretching of the fluid inclusions with low-salinity or only-liquid during freezing; (3) thermal re-equilibration caused by stretching and necking following inclusions formation; and (4) thermal equilibrium re-established, resulting from external influences (e.g., stratigraphic uplift or burial) after inclusions formation [31,32]. Therefore, we have made every effort to conduct meticulous sampling and precise temperature measurement and have tried our best to effectively avoid wide variations in homogenization temperatures caused by irregular operations. Moreover, the majority of inclusions hosted in minerals are predominantly brine inclusions (Figure 5), which preclude stretching during freezing. The majority of inclusions selected for microthermometric analysis exhibit negative crystal-shaped or spherical morphology, with small diameters, and no necking was observed, ruling out stretching or necking as factors causing homogenization temperature variations. Following entrapment, inclusions experience new temperature and pressure conditions that may stretch, leak, or refill, resulting in significant temperature distribution and convergence trends on the temperature–salinity diagram (Figure 7) [33]. The histogram of inclusions’ homogenization temperatures and the temperature–salinity plot exhibit a notable convergence trend in the temperature–salinity relationship (Figure 7). Therefore, the homogenization temperatures may not represent the actual trapping temperatures of fluids but are more likely to reflect the effects of subsequent thermal re-equilibration. The actual trapping temperature of fluids may have been close to or even significantly lower than the lowest measured homogenization temperature [31]. Furthermore, the absence of hydrothermal alteration in the host rocks also indicates a relatively low temperature for the fluids from which the witherite was precipitated.
The widespread occurrence of aqueous inclusions in both types of minerals are similar to those found in low-temperature sedimentary deposits [34,35]. The salinity of inclusions ranges (0.2 to 23.0 wt.% NaCl equivalent) from less than to greater than seawater values, which typically results from phase separation (boiling), but may also be potentially induced by the fluids mixing [36,37]. During mineralization, fluid mixing and boiling are key ore-forming mechanisms [30]. Mixing occurs when fluids of different compositions or properties combine, disrupting the chemical equilibrium and causing mineral precipitation. In contrast, boiling results from rapid pressure drop, which drastically reduces the solubility of ore-forming components via volatile exsolution, concomitantly triggering mineral deposition and generating vapor-dominated two-phase fluid inclusions [31]. As previously discussed, the actual trapping temperature of the fluids is likely close to or significantly lower than the minimum homogenization temperature (54.2 °C), while boiling is commonly associated with hydrothermal deposits [30]. Thus, boiling is unlikely to be the primary ore-forming mechanism for this deposit. In contrast, fluid mixing is more likely responsible for the broad salinity range measured. Given the low-temperature nature of the deposit and the similarity of FI types to those found in low-temperature sedimentary deposits, it is inferred that the mineralizing fluids underwent mixing of different fluid sources (such as a high-temperature brine with ambient seawater). This process resulted in a wide salinity range (0.2 to 16.2 wt.%), disrupted the chemical equilibrium, and facilitated the precipitation of witherite.
Witherite was precipitated from fluids with low to moderate salinity (0.2 to 16.2 wt.%). As mentioned earlier, the salinity range of FIs in the Bashan witherite deposit (0.2 to 16.2 wt.%) suggests the presence of at least two distinct fluid sources. Based on the histogram of inclusion salinity distribution (Figure 5), the salinity range indicates the existence of two end-member fluids during the early mineralization stage: one with moderate salinity (~18 wt.%) and another with low salinity (<5 wt.%). The measured salinities of the moderately saline fluids agree well with that of the basinal brines [38]. The salinity of the low-salinity (<5 wt.%) fluids agrees with that of seawater (3.2 wt.% [39]). Therefore, basinal fluids and seawater could be the components of mineralizing solutions in the studied deposit. Additionally, Hu (2021) investigated the metallogenic geological background of the Chengkou witherite deposit and concluded that the Early Cambrian strata in this region represented a marine sedimentary environment, where the ore-forming fluids were closely related to seawater and basinal fluids [40]. Laser Raman analysis results (Figure 6) indicate that the vapor-phase composition of FIs in the host mineral (witherite and barytocalcite) is predominantly H2O, with reducing gases such as H2S and CH4, while the liquid phase contains HS. The presence of gases such as H2S and CH4 may suggest that the aggregation and deposition of witherite minerals occurred in a reducing environment.

5.2. Sources of Ore-Forming Materials

Sr isotopes are often used as a proxy for Ba origin due to their similar chemical properties [41]. In the Chengkou area, the 87Sr/86Sr ratios of witherite minerals range from 0.708266 to 0.708504 (average 0.708339; Supplementary Table S1), while they fall within the range of contemporaneous Cambrian seawater (0.708 to 0.709) [42], global studies of marine carbonates from various regions have shown that the Sr isotope compositions are mostly lower than those of contemporary Cambrian seawater (0.709 [43]). Hydrothermal fluids typically have low 87Sr/86Sr ratios [44], whereas continental clastic material has high radiogenic 87Sr contents [15]. The 87Sr/86Sr ratios of witherite deposits in South China are generally lower than those of coeval seawater (Figure 8b), indicating that the barium in the Qinling-Dabashan metallogenic belt shares a similar source, which was likely mixing of hydrothermally derived Sr with seawater. In addition, the 87Sr/86Sr ratios of some witherite deposits in South China deviate from those of coeval seawater, suggesting that the barium sources in the metallogenic belts may have been locally influenced by detrital inputs from terrestrial sources or overprinted by hydrothermal fluids. It is worth noting that the precipitation of Ba as carbonate would require low seawater sulphate concentrations (otherwise, it will precipitate as barite), high rates of bacterial sulfate reduction, and sulfidic conditions. This is supported by the extremely heavy δ34S values of Early Cambrian seawater [45,46].
Carbon and oxygen isotope research on carbonate minerals provides insights into the carbon source during mineral formation and contributes to understanding the carbon cycle [47]. However, oxygen isotopes in carbonate minerals are highly susceptible to diagenesis [48,49,50]. This could lead to a substantial decrease in δ18O values, impacting the reliability of isotopic information [51]. As depicted in Figure 9, there is no significant correlation between δ13C values and δ18O values (Figure 10A–H), except for the Miaozi and Chiyan areas (where apparent covariation may result from data scarcity in those areas), suggesting minimal diagenetic influence and the credibility of δ18O values [52].
The C-O isotopes of witherite in the Dabashan region exhibit a marked negative excursion (δ13CVPDB = −25 to −10‰, δ18OVPDB = −20 to −10‰; Figure 9b) compared to Early Cambrian dolomites from other regions of the world. Previous studies have demonstrated that C isotopes are closely linked to sea level changes: as sea levels rise, enhanced solar radiation boosts biological productivity, resulting in the preferential absorption of 12C by plants [62]. Ultimately, carbonate rocks precipitated from seawater exhibit relative enrichment of 13C. Additionally, δ18O values influenced by hydrothermal fluids typically fall below −10‰ [63]. The variations in C-O isotopes of witherite from the Dabashan region may indicate regional paleo-oceanic changes during the Cambrian period, such as shifts in photosynthesis rates, productivity, or organic matter oxidation, or they may result from localized influences like hydrothermal fluids.
The δ13C values of witherite and barytocalcite in the Chengkou area range from −15.6 to −12.5‰ (average −14.0‰; Figure 8a), indicating that the carbon may be derived from the oxidation or dehydroxylation of organic matter [64]. In the C-O isotope illustration (Figure 9a), the data from the Chengkou area are more concentrated in the vicinity of dehydroxylation, similar to the witherite deposits in the Bashan, Chiyan, and Huangbaishuwan areas, suggesting that dehydroxylation of organic matter contributes significantly to the CO 3 2 content. During this process, bacteria or microorganisms produce 12C-rich CO2, CH4, and other gases through degradation of organic matter. These gases are oxidized and dissolved in seawater to form CO 3 2 ions during diffusion [24]. In contrast to the Sichuan Basin (19.68~27.52), the δ18O values in the Chengkou area (15.7~18) exhibit a significantly negative excursion (Figure 9a). During the period of sea level decline, the δ18O values increased, tectonic movements caused relative uplift in the region, and the sea level decreased subsequently. Therefore, the relatively positive δ18O values in the Sichuan area may be attributed to intense evaporation resulting from the relative uplift of the area due to tectonic movements. In contrast, the highly negative δ18O values in the Chengkou region, different from those in the Sichuan Basin, may be related to meteoric diagenesis or hydrothermal effects. We infer that it is the latter because the oxygen isotope values are significantly lighter (by ~15‰) compared to coeval sedimentary carbonates, which is consistent with the research result of the δ18O of the precipitated witherite at temperatures significantly higher than those of sedimentary carbonates (~25 °C) [65].

5.3. Implications for the Marine Environment

The marine environment played a crucial role in the large-scale precipitation of witherite [6,7]. This environment includes pH, redox conditions, and elemental cycling processes. The rapid precipitation of witherite deposits in South China during the Early Cambrian reflects the significant control of specific paleo-marine environments on witherite mineralization.
The crystallization and precipitation of witherite are primarily governed by the concentrations of Ba2+ and CO 3 2 in seawater, which are closely linked to the oceanic redox state [6,11]. Although oxygen levels in the atmosphere and ocean had significantly increased by the Early Cambrian [4], locally restricted basins with oxic surface waters and anoxic, sulfidic deep waters developed along the continental slope of the Yangtze Platform [66]. These restricted basins provided relatively stable, low-energy sedimentary environments conducive to the formation of laminated and banded witherite. Additionally, the anoxic and sulfidic waters dissolved substantial amounts of Ba2+, providing the necessary material basis for the large-scale precipitation of witherite [7].
In restricted basins, intense microbial reduction significantly lowered the concentration of SO 4 2 in seawater. Under these conditions, with limited SO 4 2 concentrations in an anoxic environment, Ba2+ remained in a dissolved state in seawater [12], potentially leading to the formation of a reservoir of Ba2+ in the Early Cambrian marine [12,67]. During the Early Cambrian, the restricted basins along the Yangtze Platform margin may have been intermittently connected to the open ocean [11]. In this context, the degradation of organic matter produced CO 3 2 -rich fluids, which were introduced into the restricted basins and mixed with dissolved Ba2+, providing the necessary conditions for the formation of witherite.

5.4. The Mechanism of Ore-Forming

The marine environment surrounding the Yangtze Block during the Early Cambrian was marked by oxygen deficiency and sulfur enrichment, with ancient seawater showing a redox-stratified structure [68,69]. This environment played a crucial role in sedimentary and geochemical processes and influenced the formation of witherite deposit. Under the influence of tectonic activity and submarine hydrothermal processes, the sulfate concentration in seawater of the Qinba region significantly decreased, while hydrothermal fluids introduced H2S, leading to anoxic and sulfidic conditions in the seawater (Figure 11A). Additionally, contemporaneous faults controlled the formation of sub-basins within the Yangtze Block [70]. High-grade witherite ore bodies are linearly distributed in the Chengkou-Zhenba area (Figure 1), indicating venting of hydrothermal fluid along fault conduits [71]. This further suggests the Early Cambrian extensional sub-basins in Chengkou, creating a euxinic seafloor environment. In such conditions (seawater rich in H2S and HS), Ba was partially enriched as ions (Ba2+) (Figure 11B). The extreme conditions of oxygen deficiency and sulfur enrichment led to widespread massive biological mortality on the seafloor. Simultaneously, bacteria or microorganisms produced CO2, CH4, and other gases through degradation of organic matter. Then, this methane is reduced to CO 3 2 in an environment where SO 4 2 is present. This process ultimately led to the precipitation of witherite. The carbon isotopic data from the Chengkou witherite deposit provide additional support for this process. According to the δ13C and δ18O relationship diagram (Figure 9a), the carbon in witherite originates from biogenic sources and is converted from reduced organic carbon (CH4) to oxidized carbon ( CO 3 2 ). The fractionation process can be described as follows:
Organic matter → CH4 + CO2
CH 4 + SO 4 2     CO 3 2 + H 2 S + H 2 O
Ba 2 + + CO 3 2 BaCO 3
The continuous precipitation of BaCO3 (witherite) requires these reactions to proceed unidirectionally, leading to carbon enrichment essential for witherite formation. This process is accompanied by significant carbon isotope fractionation, producing a certain cumulative fractionation effect [72,73]. Given that biogenic methane typically exhibits light δ13C values (−110‰ to −50‰) [74], the resultant carbonates (BaCO3) are expected to have δ13C values ranging from −33‰ to −7‰. The measured δ13C values of witherite in the Chengkou deposit (−15.6‰ to −12.5‰, average −14.0‰) fall within this predicted range, confirming that the carbon source originated from microbial degradation of organic matter during early diagenesis.
Compared with modern seawater, the higher bacterial or microbial reduction rate and sulfidation conditions during the Cambrian period, as well as the lower concentration of sulfate in the seawater, created a more favorable marine environment for the deposition of barite (as confirmed by the laser Raman analysis of inclusions in Section 4.4, which also suggests the association of witherite with environments containing H2S and HS) [75]. In summary, the formation of witherite deposits in the Chengkou region reflects key transitional periods in Earth’s history. The heterogeneous distribution of H2S, HS, or sulfate content in seawater played a crucial role in their formation. The formation and evolution of ancient continents significantly influenced the geological and marine environments in the Sichuan Basin during the Early Cambrian, resulting in a heterogeneous ocean. This oceanic heterogeneity, especially in sulfur-rich and oxygen-deficient marine environments, facilitated the enrichment and deposition of witherite.

6. Conclusions

  • Strontium isotope data indicate that the Chengkou witherite deposit shares a common seawater origin with other deposits in the Qinling-Dabashan region. The δ13C values of witherite fall between marine carbonate and organic matter, suggesting a specific contribution of organic matter to the formation of witherite. The wide range of homogenization temperatures (54.2 to 162.7 °C) does not reflect the original trapping temperatures of the ore-forming fluids but rather results from post-entrapment thermal re-equilibration of the inclusions. Fluids contain H2S, CH4, HS, etc., indicating the formation of witherite in a sulfur-rich and oxygen-deficient stratified water environment, revealing the complexity of the marine environment in the study area during the Early Cambrian.
  • The large-scale precipitation of witherite deposits in South China during the Early Cambrian was controlled by unique paleo-marine sedimentary environments. Although atmospheric and oceanic oxygen concentration had risen substantially during this period, the restricted marginal basins of the Yangtze Platform evolved a distinct stratified water column characterized by oxic surface waters overlying euxinic (anoxic and sulfidic) deep waters. This persistent physicochemical stratification created a stable, low-energy sedimentary environment, which is conducive to witherite formation.
  • During the Early Cambrian, Chengkou was situated within a restricted marginal basin, where the low sulfate content in the ocean favored the enrichment of Ba+. The extensive proliferation and subsequent death of Cambrian organisms led to the accumulation and degradation of a large amount of organic matter in the Chengkou region, creating a limited marine environment rich in CO 3 2 . This unique restricted marine environment ultimately became a crucial control factor for forming the largest witherite deposit in the world.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/min15090978/s1, Table S1: Compilation of strontium, carbon, and oxygen isotopes for barytocalcite and witherite; Table S2: Microthermometric results for witherite and barytocalcite [7,21,22,26,76,77].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.J., C.W. and H.L.; methodology, J.J.; validation, F.L. and C.Y.; investigation, Y.H., Y.T., K.H. and S.Z.; resources, C.W. and H.L.; data curation, J.J. and Z.X.; writing—original draft preparation, J.J., C.W. and H.L.; writing—review and editing, F.L.; project administration, C.W. and H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Open Fund Project of the Key Laboratory of Carbonate Reservoirs, China National Petroleum Corporation, grant numbers RIPED-2023-JS-2400; Key Support Project of the Joint Fund of National Natural Science Foundation, grant numbers U23B20154; the Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangzhou Science and Technology Bureau, grant number 2025A04J4649; CNPC Innovation Fund, grant number 2024DQ02-0107; and the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 42302120.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The Author Jie Jiang is employees of the China National Logging Corporation; The Author Feng Liang is employees of China National Petroleum Corporation; Authors Changjian Yuan and Kaibin Han are employees of the Tarim Oilfield Company, PetroChina; The Author Susu Zhou is employees of the Zhejiang Provincial Geological & Mineral Engineering Investigation Institute Limited Company; This paper reflects the views of the scientists and not the companies. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wang, D.; Ling, H.F.; Struck, U.; Zhu, X.K.; Zhu, M.; He, T.; Yang, B.; Gamper, A.; Shields, G.A. Coupling of ocean redox and animal evolution during the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. He, T.; Zhu, M.; Mills, B.J.; Wynn, P.M.; Zhuravlev, A.Y.; Tostevin, R.; Pogge von Strandmann, P.A.; Yang, A.; Poulton, S.W.; Shields, G.A. Possible links between extreme oxygen perturbations and the Cambrian radiation of animals. Nat. Geosci. 2019, 12, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wei, G.Y.; Planavsky, N.J.; Tarhan, L.G.; He, T.; Wang, D.; Shields, G.A.; Wei, W.; Ling, H.F. Highly dynamic marine redox state through the Cambrian explosion highlighted by authigenic δ238U records. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2020, 544, 116361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, X.; Ling, H.F.; Vance, D.; Shields-Zhou, G.A.; Zhu, M.; Poulton, S.W.; Och, L.M.; Jiang, S.Y.; Li, D.; Cremonese, L.; et al. Rise to modern levels of ocean oxygenation coincided with the Cambrian radiation of animals. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, L.W.; Yang, T.; Li, J.; Lin, Y.; Ling, H.F. The marine redox evolution and the formation model for the early Cambrian Gongxi-Tianzhu barite deposits in the South China Block. Ore Geo. Rev. 2023, 158, 105502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pi, D.H.; Jiang, S.Y.; Luo, L.; Yang, J.H.; Ling, H.F. Depositional environments for stratiform witherite deposits in the Lower Cambrian black shale sequence of the Yangtze Platform, southern Qinling region, SW China: Evidence from redox-sensitive trace element geochemistry. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2014, 398, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, L.G.; Lehmann, B.; Mao, J.W.; Zheng, W.; Ye, H.S.; Li, H.Y. Strontium, sulfur, carbon, and oxygen isotope geochemistry of the Early Cambrian strata-bound barite and witherite deposits of the Qinling-Daba Region, Northern Margin of the Yangtze Craton, China. Econ. Geol. 2016, 111, 695–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bates, S.L.; Hendry, K.R.; Pryer, H.V.; Kinsley, C.W.; Pyle, K.M.; Woodward, E.M.S.; Horner, T.J. Barium isotopes reveal role of ocean circulation on barium cycling in the Atlantic. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2017, 204, 286–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Charbonnier, Q.; Moynier, F.; Bouchez, J. Barium isotope cosmochemistry and geochemistry. Sci. Bull. 2018, 63, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hsieh, Y.T.; Henderson, G.M. Barium stable isotopes in the global ocean: Tracer of Ba inputs and utilization. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2017, 473, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wei, W.; Zeng, Z.; Shen, J.; Tian, L.L.; Wei, G.Y.; Ling, H.F.; Huang, F. Dramatic changes in the carbonate-hosted barium isotopic compositions in the Ediacaran Yangtze Platform. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2021, 299, 113–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Crockford, P.W.; Wing, B.A.; Paytan, A.; Hodgskiss, M.S.; Mayfield, K.K.; Hayles, J.A.; Middleton, J.E.; Ahm, A.S.C.; Johnston, D.T.; Caxito, F.; et al. Barium-isotopic constraints on the origin of post-Marinoan barites. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2019, 519, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alaminia, Z.; Sharifi, M. Geological, geochemical and fluid inclusion studies on the evolution of barite mineralization in the Badroud area of Iran. Ore Geo. Rev. 2018, 92, 613–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Keveshk, H.H.; Ehya, F.; Paydar, G.R.; Kheymehsari, S.M. Rare earth elements geochemistry, O and S isotopic compositions, and microthermometric data of barite from the Kuh–Ghalagheh deposit, Markazi Province, Iran. Appl. Geochem. 2021, 135, 105128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Griffith, E.M.; Paytan, A. Barite in the ocean–occurrence, geochemistry and palaeoceanographic applications. Sedimentology 2012, 59, 1817–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mißbach, H.; Duda, J.P.; Van Den Kerkhof, A.M.; Lüders, V.; Pack, A.; Reitner, J.; Thiel, V. Ingredients for microbial life preserved in 35 billion-year-old fluid inclusions. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Green, D.I.; Young, B. Hydromagnesite and dypingite from the Northern Pennine Orefield, northern England. P. Yorks. Geol. Soc. 2006, 56, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fitch, A.A. Barite and witherite from near el portal, mariposa county, california. Am. Mineral. J. Earth Planet. Mat. 1931, 16, 461–468. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tu, H.K. Mineralizing conditions and mechanism of the barite deposits in the meeting area of Shaanxi, Gansu and Sichuan provinces. Geol. Chem. Miner. 1998, 20, 295–300. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. Tang, J.X.; Lin, W.D.; Gao, D.R.; Mu, J.L. The genesis of the Miaozi witherite-barytocalcite-barytodolomite deposit in Wanyuan city, Sichuan province. Miner. Depos. 1998, 17, 264–276. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. Lv, Z.C.; Liu, C.Q.; Liu, J.J.; Wu, F.C. Geochemical studies on the Lower Cambrian witherite-bearing cherts in the northern Daba Mountains. Acta Geol. Sin. 2004, 78, 390–406. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. Luo, L. The Depositional Environment and C-O-Sr Isotopic Characters of Witherite Deposits in Qinling-Daba Mountain Areas, SW China. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China, 2011. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  23. Chamberlain, S.C.; Dossert, W.P.; Siegel, D.I. A new paragenesis and new localities for witherite. Can. Mineral. 1986, 24, 79–90. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lv, Z.C.; Liu, C.Q.; Liu, J.J.; Zhao, Z.Q.; Wu, F.C.; Li, J. Carbon, oxygen and strontium isotopic studies of the Huangbashuwan witherite deposit at Ziyang and Wenyuhe witherite deposit at Zhushan, China. Geochimica 2005, 34, 557–573. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu, J.J.; Wu, S.H.; Liu, Z.J.; Su, W.C.; Wang, J.P. A discussion on the origin of witherite deposits in large-scale barium metallogenic belt, southern Qinling Mountains, China: Evidence from individual fluid inclusion. Earth Sci. Front. 2010, 17, 222–238. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, Z.C.; Li, G.Z. Barite and witherite deposits in Lower Cambrian shales of South China: Stratigraphic distribution and geochemical characterization. Econ. Geol. 1991, 86, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cheng, Z.; Qi, S.; Jiang, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, M.; Tang, L.; Liu, L.; Zhu, Y. Source and genesis of Chapai carbonate-hosted Zn-Pb deposit, South China: Constraints from in-situ S and Pb isotopes of sulfide and sulfate minerals. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 164, 105808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gao, H.Z. The biochemical sedimentary metallogenic model of baritic and witheritic deposits in Lower Cambrian in China. J. Miner. Petrol. 1998, 2, 70–77. [Google Scholar]
  29. Roedder, E. Volume 12: Fluid inclusions. In Reviews in Mineralogy; Ribbe, P.H., Ed.; Mineralogical Society of America: Blacksburg, WV, USA, 1984; Volume 12, p. 644. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kesler, S.E. Ore-forming fluids. Elements 2005, 1, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fall, A.; Bodnar, R.J. How precisely can the temperature of a fluid event be constrained using fluid inclusions? Econ. Geol. 2018, 113, 1817–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chi, G.; Diamond, L.W.; Lu, H.; Lai, J.; Chu, H. Common problems and pitfalls in fluid inclusion study: A review and discussion. Minerals 2020, 11, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Goldstein, R.H. Fluid inclusions in sedimentary and diagenetic systems. Lithos 2001, 55, 159–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zaw, K.; Gemmell, J.B.; Large, R.R.; Mernagh, T.P.; Ryan, C.G. Evolution and source of ore fluids in the stringer system, Hellyer VHMS deposit, Tasmania, Australia: Evidence from fluid inclusion microthermometry and geochemistry. Ore Geol. Rev. 1996, 10, 251–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kerrich, R.; Goldfarb, R.; Groves, D.; Garwin, S.; Jia, Y. The characteristics, origins, and geodynamic settings of supergiant gold metallogenic provinces. Sci. China Series D Earth Sci. 2000, 43, 1–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ronde, C.E.D.; Faure, K.; Bray, C.J.; Chappell, D.A.; Wright, I.C. Hydrothermal fluids associated with seafloor mineralization at two southern Kermadec arc volcanoes, offshore New Zealand. Miner. Deposita 2003, 38, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Safina, N.P.; Melekestseva, I.Y.; Nimis, P.; Ankusheva, N.N.; Yuminov, A.M.; Kotlyarov, V.A.; Sadykov, S.A. Barite from the Saf’yanovka VMS deposit (Central Urals) and Semenov-1 and Semenov-3 hydrothermal sulfide fields (Mid-Atlantic Ridge): A comparative analysis of formation conditions. Miner. Deposita 2016, 51, 491–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bodnar, R.J. Hydrothermal solutions. In Encyclopedia of Geochemistry; Marshall, C.P., Fairbridge, R.W., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Lancaster, PA, USA, 1999; pp. 333–337. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bischoff, J.L.; Rosenbauer, R.J. The critical point and two-phase boundary of seawater, 200–500 °C. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 1984, 68, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hu, Y.X. Research of Metallogenic Geological Background and Metallogenic Model of “Bashan Type” Witherite Deposits in Chongqing. Master’s Thesis, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yang, X.Q.; Zhang, Z.H.; Duan, S.G. Origin of the Mesoproterozoic Jingtieshan bedded barite deposit, north Qilian Mountains, NW China: Geochemical and isotope (O, S, Sr) evidence. Geol. J. 2018, 53, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. McArthur, J.M.; Howarth, R.J.; Shields, G.A.; Zhou, Y. Strontium isotope stratigraphy. In Geologic Time Scale 2020; Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G., Schmitz, M.D., Ogg, G.M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 1, pp. 211–238. [Google Scholar]
  43. Chen, X.; Zhou, Y.; Shields, G.A. Progress towards an improved Precambrian seawater 87Sr/86Sr curve. Earth Sci. Rev. 2022, 224, 103869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Palmer, M.R.; Edmond, J.M. The strontium isotope budget of the modern ocean. Earth Planet. Sci. Let. 1989, 92, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Present, T.M.; Adkins, J.F.; Fischer, W.W. Variability in Sulfur Isotope Records of Phanerozoic Seawater Sulfate. Geophy. Res. Lett. 2020, 47, e2020GL088766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Absar, N.; Kalam, T.D.A.; Raza, M.Q.; Ashok, M.; Islam, R. Redox conditions of Early Cambrian Ocean as deciphered from multi-proxy geochemical and isotopic studies of Proto-Tethys carbonaceous sediments from Outer Lesser Himalaya, India. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 2024, 13326, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, X.L.; Zhou, X.; Hu, D.P. High-resolution paired carbon isotopic records from the Meishucun section in South China: Implications for carbon cycling and environmental changes during the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition. Precambrian Res. 2020, 337, 105561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shields, G.; Veizer, J. Precambrian marine carbonate isotope database: Version 1.1. Geochem. Geophy. Geosy. 2002, 3, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Goddéris, Y.; Le Hir, G.; Macouin, M.; Donnadieu, Y.; Hubert-Théou, L.; Dera, G.; Aretz, M.; Fluteau, F.; Li, Z.X.; Halverson, G.P. Paleogeographic forcing of the strontium isotopic cycle in the Neoproterozoic. Gondwana Res. 2017, 42, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cui, H.; Kaufman, A.J.; Zou, H.; Kattan, F.H.; Trusler, P.; Smith, J.; Ivantsov, A.Y.; Rich, T.H.; Al Qubsani, A.; Yazedi, A.; et al. Primary or secondary? A dichotomy of the strontium isotope anomalies in the Ediacaran carbonates of Saudi Arabia. Precambrian Res. 2020, 343, 105720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Derry, L.A.; Brasier, M.D.; Corfield, R.E.A.; Rozanov, A.Y.; Zhuravlev, A.Y. Sr and C isotopes in Lower Cambrian carbonates from the Siberian craton: A paleoenvironmental record during the ‘Cambrian explosion’. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1994, 128, 671–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, P.Y.; Wang, Y.L.; Zhang, X.J.; Wei, Z.F.; Wang, G.; Zhang, T.; Ma, H.; Wei, J.Y.; He, W.; Ma, X.Y.; et al. Carbon, oxygen and strontium isotopic and elemental characteristics of the Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation in South China: Paleoenvironmental significance and implications for carbon isotope excursions. Gondwana Res. 2022, 106, 174–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhou, H.; Gao, D.; Huang, L.L.; Zhu, G.Y.; Zhang, T.F.; Liu, J.J.; Zhai, X.F.; Xiong, R.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.Y. Characteristics and genesis of dolomite in the lower Cambrian Xiaoerbulake Formation of the western Tarim Basin, China. Front. Earth Sci. 2023, 10, 1075941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nicolaides, S. Origin and modification of Cambrian dolomites (Red Heart Dolomite and Arthur Creek Formation), Georgina Basin, central Australia. Sedimentology 1995, 42, 249–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Huang, H.X.; Wen, H.G.; Wen, L.; Zhang, B.J.; Zhou, G.; He, Y.; Wen, L.B.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, H.C. Multistage dolomitization of deeply buried dolomite in the Lower Cambrian Canglangpu Formation, central and northern Sichuan Basin. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 2023, 152, 106261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhou, C.M.; Zhang, J.M.; Li, G.X.; Yu, Z.Y. Early Cambrian Carbon and Oxygen Isotope Records in Xiaotan, Yongshan, Yunnan. Geol. Sci. 1997, 32, 201–211. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhang, W.; Deng, X.; Peng, L.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, D.; Liu, H.; Jin, X.; Sun, J.; Lai, C. Rare earth elements and carbon-oxygen isotopes of calcite from the Tongjiachong Cu deposit, South China: Implications for fluid source and mineral precipitation. Ore Geol. Rev. 2020, 116, 103236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Amthor, J.E.; Grotzinger, J.P.; Schröder, S.; Bowring, S.A.; Ramezani, J.; Martin, M.W.; Matter, A. Extinction of Cloudina and Namacalathus at the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary in Oman. Geology 2003, 31, 431–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gaucher, C.; Sial, A.N.; Ferreira, V.P.; Pimentel, M.M.; Chiglino, L.; Sprechmann, P. Chemostratigraphy of the Cerro Victoria Formation (Lower Cambrian, Uruguay): Evidence for progressive climate stabilization across the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary. Chem. Geol. 2007, 237, 28–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gregg, J.M.; Shelton, K.L. Dolomitization and dolomite neomorphism in the back reef facies of the Bonneterre and Davis formations (Cambrian), southeastern Missouri. J. Sed. Res. 1990, 60, 549–562. [Google Scholar]
  61. Mehrabi, B.; Karimi Shahraki, B.; Bazargani Guilani, K.; Masoudi, F. Early Cambrian high-temperature dolomite of the Rizu Series in the Jalal-Abad iron ore deposit, Central Iran. Arab. J. Geosci. 2015, 8, 7163–7176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yan, Z.B.; Guo, F.S.; Pan, J.Y.; Guo, G.L.; Zhang, Y.J. Application of C, O and Sr isotope composition of carbonates in the research of paleoclimate and paleooceanic environment. Contrib. Geol. Miner. Reso. Res. 2005, 20, 53–56. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  63. He, X.Y.; Shou, J.F.; Shen, A.J.; Wu, X.N.; Wang, Y.S.; Hu, Y.Y.; Zhu, Y.; Wei, X.D. Geochemical Characteristics and Genesis of Dolomite. Petrol. Explor. Dev. 2014, 41, 375. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  64. Ackerman, L.; Žák, J.; Žák, K.; Pašava, J.; Kachlik, V.; Hora, J.; Veselovský, F.; Hajná, J. Carbon, oxygen, and strontium isotopic fingerprint in Neoproterozoic to early Cambrian limestones in an active margin setting: A record of local environment or global changes? Precambrian Res. 2022, 370, 106538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kim, S.T.; O’Neil, J.R. Equilibrium and nonequilibrium oxygen isotope effects in synthetic carbonates. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1997, 61, 3461–3475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, C.; Planavsky, N.J.; Shi, W.; Zhang, Z.H.; Zhou, C.M.; Cheng, M.; Tarhan, L.G.; Luo, G.M.; Xie, S.C. Ediacaran marine redox heterogeneity and early animal ecosystems. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Han, T.; Peng, Y.B.; Bao, H.M. Sulfate-limited euxinic seawater facilitated Paleozoic massively bedded barite deposition. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2022, 582, 117419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sperling, E.A.; Melchin, M.J.; Fraser, T.; Stockey, R.G.; Farrell, U.C.; Bhajan, L.; Brunoir, T.N.; Cole, D.B.; Gill, B.C.; Lenz, A.; et al. A long-term record of early to mid-Paleozoic marine redox change. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, 4382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chang, C.; Hu, W.; Huang, K.J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X. Mass extinction coincided with expanded continental margin euxinia during the Cambrian Age 4. Geophy. Res. Lett. 2023, 50, e2023GL105560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ding, Y.; Chen, D.; Zhou, X.; Guo, C.; Huang, T.; Zhang, G. Tectono-depositional pattern and evolution of the middle Yangtze Platform (South China) during the late Ediacaran. Precambrian Res. 2019, 333, 105426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gwiazda, R.H.; Paull, C.K.; Caress, D.W.; Preston, C.M.; Johnson, S.B.; Lundsten, E.M.; Anderson, K. The Extent of Fault-Associated Modern Authigenic Barite Deposits Offshore Northern Baja California Revealed by High-Resolution Mapping. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Craig, H. Geochemical implications of the isotopic composition of carbon in the ancient rocks. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1954, 6, 186–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Emrich, K.; Ehhalt, D.H.; Vogel, J.C. Carbon isotope fractionation during the precipitation of calcium carbonate. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1970, 8, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Whiticar, M.J. Carbon and hydrogen isotope systematics of bacterial formation and oxidation of methane. Chem. Geol. 1999, 161, 291–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Stolper, D.A.; Pu, X.; Lloyd, M.K.; Christensen, N.I.; Bucholz, C.E.; Lange, R.A. Constraints on Early Paleozoic deep-ocean oxygen concentrations from the iron geochemistry of the bay of islands ophiolite. Geochem. Geophy. Geosy. 2022, 23, e2021GC010196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Shi, L. Discussion on Forming Conditions and Process of the Barite-Witherite Deposits in Lower Cambrian, Northern Daba Mountains, China. Master’s Thesis, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, China, 2007. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  77. Wang, Z.C.; Fan, D.L.; Chen, J.S. origin of witherite ore deposits in early Cambrian Dabashan black shale series. Chin. J. Geol. 1992, 27, 237–248. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Geological map of Southern China (adapted from Cheng et al., 2023 [27]). (b) Geological sketch map of barium metallogenic belt in South Qinling region (adapted from Pi et al., 2014 [6]). (c) The stratigraphic column of the Chengkou-Bashan deposit. LJP Fm. represents the Lujiaping Formation, and Bashan Fm. represents the Bashan Formation.
Figure 1. (a) Geological map of Southern China (adapted from Cheng et al., 2023 [27]). (b) Geological sketch map of barium metallogenic belt in South Qinling region (adapted from Pi et al., 2014 [6]). (c) The stratigraphic column of the Chengkou-Bashan deposit. LJP Fm. represents the Lujiaping Formation, and Bashan Fm. represents the Bashan Formation.
Minerals 15 00978 g001
Figure 2. Field macrophotographs and photomicrographs the Chengkou-Bashan witherite. (a) The integration and contact relationship between the second section of the Bashan Formation (Є1b2) and the Lujiaping Formation (Є1l). (b) The reversed bedded witherite orebodies. (c) Thick black chert. (d) Photomicrographs of thick black chert (+). (e) Thinly black carbonaceous chert. (f) Photomicrographs of carbonaceous chert (−).
Figure 2. Field macrophotographs and photomicrographs the Chengkou-Bashan witherite. (a) The integration and contact relationship between the second section of the Bashan Formation (Є1b2) and the Lujiaping Formation (Є1l). (b) The reversed bedded witherite orebodies. (c) Thick black chert. (d) Photomicrographs of thick black chert (+). (e) Thinly black carbonaceous chert. (f) Photomicrographs of carbonaceous chert (−).
Minerals 15 00978 g002
Figure 3. Structural features of the Chengkou-Bashan witherite, barytocalcite, and barite from Chengkou County. (a) Black-banded witherite core samples. (b) Black cryptocrystalline banded. (c) Dense, massive witherite mineral samples. (d) The network-like witherite sample. (e) Cryptocrystalline-fine crystalline witherite under the microscope (−). (f) Bundle-radial textures under the microscope (−). (g) Coarse-grained witherite hand specimen. (h) Coarse, anhedral witherite grains under the microscope (−). (i) The coexistence of witherite, barytocalcite, and barite (+). (j) Radial barite (−). Bac—barytocalcite; Brt—barite; Wth—witherite.
Figure 3. Structural features of the Chengkou-Bashan witherite, barytocalcite, and barite from Chengkou County. (a) Black-banded witherite core samples. (b) Black cryptocrystalline banded. (c) Dense, massive witherite mineral samples. (d) The network-like witherite sample. (e) Cryptocrystalline-fine crystalline witherite under the microscope (−). (f) Bundle-radial textures under the microscope (−). (g) Coarse-grained witherite hand specimen. (h) Coarse, anhedral witherite grains under the microscope (−). (i) The coexistence of witherite, barytocalcite, and barite (+). (j) Radial barite (−). Bac—barytocalcite; Brt—barite; Wth—witherite.
Minerals 15 00978 g003
Figure 4. Photographs of fluid inclusions trapped in barytocalcite (ad) and witherite (ei). L represents the liquid phase, and V represents the vapor phase.
Figure 4. Photographs of fluid inclusions trapped in barytocalcite (ad) and witherite (ei). L represents the liquid phase, and V represents the vapor phase.
Minerals 15 00978 g004
Figure 5. Histograms of salinities (A) and homogenization temperatures (B) of fluid inclusions in the Chengkou witherite deposit.
Figure 5. Histograms of salinities (A) and homogenization temperatures (B) of fluid inclusions in the Chengkou witherite deposit.
Minerals 15 00978 g005
Figure 6. Laser Raman spectra of fluid inclusions from the Chengkou witherite deposit. (AG) Aqueous inclusions in witherite, (H,I) aqueous inclusions in barytocalcite.
Figure 6. Laser Raman spectra of fluid inclusions from the Chengkou witherite deposit. (AG) Aqueous inclusions in witherite, (H,I) aqueous inclusions in barytocalcite.
Minerals 15 00978 g006
Figure 7. Homogenization temperatures versus salinity plot illustrating the distribution of data points and density of the fluid inclusions from the Chengkou witherite deposit, where dark gray squares represent data for witherite and red circles represent data for barytocalcite.
Figure 7. Homogenization temperatures versus salinity plot illustrating the distribution of data points and density of the fluid inclusions from the Chengkou witherite deposit, where dark gray squares represent data for witherite and red circles represent data for barytocalcite.
Minerals 15 00978 g007
Figure 8. Isotopic distribution characteristics of various deposits in the Qinling-Dabashan region. (a) Distribution characteristics of carbon isotopes (δ13C), where CK represents Chengkou, HBSW represents Huangbaishuwang, WM represents Waomiao, AK represents Ankang, MZ represents Miaozi, BS represents Bashan, and WYH represents Wenyuhe. (b) Distribution characteristics of strontium isotopes (87Sr/86Sr). (Data sources are listed in Supplementary Table S1).
Figure 8. Isotopic distribution characteristics of various deposits in the Qinling-Dabashan region. (a) Distribution characteristics of carbon isotopes (δ13C), where CK represents Chengkou, HBSW represents Huangbaishuwang, WM represents Waomiao, AK represents Ankang, MZ represents Miaozi, BS represents Bashan, and WYH represents Wenyuhe. (b) Distribution characteristics of strontium isotopes (87Sr/86Sr). (Data sources are listed in Supplementary Table S1).
Minerals 15 00978 g008
Figure 9. (a) δ18OVSMOW versus δ13CVPDB diagram, (b) δ18OVPDB versus δ13CVPDB plot illustrating the distribution of data points from Dabashan witherite deposit and global dolomite during the Early Cambrian. Isotope data are from the Tarim Basin [53]; Australia [54]; Sichuan Basin [55]; Yunnan [56,57]; Oman [58]; Uruguay [59]; North America [60]; Iran [61].
Figure 9. (a) δ18OVSMOW versus δ13CVPDB diagram, (b) δ18OVPDB versus δ13CVPDB plot illustrating the distribution of data points from Dabashan witherite deposit and global dolomite during the Early Cambrian. Isotope data are from the Tarim Basin [53]; Australia [54]; Sichuan Basin [55]; Yunnan [56,57]; Oman [58]; Uruguay [59]; North America [60]; Iran [61].
Minerals 15 00978 g009
Figure 10. Carbon–oxygen–strontium isotope covariance diagrams for the Qinling-Dabashan region. (AD,F) represent the carbon–oxygen isotope covariance diagrams for the Chengkou, Huangbaishuwan, Wamiao, Wenyuhe, and Bashan areas, with no apparent correlation. (E) The red dashed circle encloses isotopic data for the Chiyan area, showing a significant correlation. The blue dashed circle encloses isotopic data for the Miaozi area, demonstrating a relatively clear correlation. (G) The black dashed line represents data for the Chengkou area without apparent correlation. The red dashed line represents strontium and oxygen isotope data for the Huangbaishuwan area without apparent correlation. (H) The black, red, and blue dashed lines represent data for the Wamiao, Wenyuhe, and Chayan areas, respectively, without apparent correlation. (Solid lines in various colors in the figure represent covariance trend lines. Data sources are listed in Supplementary Table S2).
Figure 10. Carbon–oxygen–strontium isotope covariance diagrams for the Qinling-Dabashan region. (AD,F) represent the carbon–oxygen isotope covariance diagrams for the Chengkou, Huangbaishuwan, Wamiao, Wenyuhe, and Bashan areas, with no apparent correlation. (E) The red dashed circle encloses isotopic data for the Chiyan area, showing a significant correlation. The blue dashed circle encloses isotopic data for the Miaozi area, demonstrating a relatively clear correlation. (G) The black dashed line represents data for the Chengkou area without apparent correlation. The red dashed line represents strontium and oxygen isotope data for the Huangbaishuwan area without apparent correlation. (H) The black, red, and blue dashed lines represent data for the Wamiao, Wenyuhe, and Chayan areas, respectively, without apparent correlation. (Solid lines in various colors in the figure represent covariance trend lines. Data sources are listed in Supplementary Table S2).
Minerals 15 00978 g010
Figure 11. The genesis model illustrates the sedimentary environment and formation process of the Chengkou witherite deposit. (A) In a restricted basin, the tectonic activity forms a series of faults, and barium-rich and methane-bearing basinal fluids reach the seafloor. (B) Due to the continuous anaerobic action of organic matter, sulfate is constantly consumed by bacteria and methane, thereby producing abundant 12C-enriched CO 3 2 . During diffusion in seawater, fluids enriched with CO 3 2 ions are formed. When the fluids come into contact with Ba+ in seawater, witherite is directly formed.
Figure 11. The genesis model illustrates the sedimentary environment and formation process of the Chengkou witherite deposit. (A) In a restricted basin, the tectonic activity forms a series of faults, and barium-rich and methane-bearing basinal fluids reach the seafloor. (B) Due to the continuous anaerobic action of organic matter, sulfate is constantly consumed by bacteria and methane, thereby producing abundant 12C-enriched CO 3 2 . During diffusion in seawater, fluids enriched with CO 3 2 ions are formed. When the fluids come into contact with Ba+ in seawater, witherite is directly formed.
Minerals 15 00978 g011
Table 1. The source and lithology of the samples.
Table 1. The source and lithology of the samples.
Sample No.LithologyFormation
LH-001B1Laminated chertBaziping Fm.
LH-002B1Chert, C-richBaziping Fm.
LH-003B1BarytocalciteBashan Fm.
LH-003B2BarytocalciteBashan Fm.
LH-004B1BarytocalciteBashan Fm.
LH-004B3ShaleBashan Fm.
LH-004B4WitheriteBashan Fm.
LH-004B5BarytocalciteBashan Fm.
LH-006B2WitheriteBashan Fm.
LH-007B1BarytocalciteBashan Fm.
LH-007B2BarytocalciteBashan Fm.
LH-008B1DolostoneLujiaping Fm.
“Fm.” stands for “Formation”.
Table 2. Microthermometric results (the detailed data can be found in Supplementary Table S1).
Table 2. Microthermometric results (the detailed data can be found in Supplementary Table S1).
Sample NumberMineralNLong Axis Size (um)Tm, ice (°C)Th (°C)Salinity
(wt.% NaCl eq.)
Pressure
(MPa)
Density
(g/cm3)
Range (Mean)Range
(Mean)
Range
(Mean)
Range
(Mean)
Range
(Mean)
004b5barytocalcite271.4~7.5−0.1~−5.0
(−1.7)
62.3~167.7
(109.5)
0.2~7.9
(2.67)
3.89~13.24
(7.84)
0.932~1.027 (0.973)
007b1barytocalcite61.1~3.1−0.9~−9.9
(−5.5)
89.4~126.3
(111.9)
1.6~13.8
(5.99)
6.73~12.53
(9.61)
0.952~1.049 (0.994)
007b2barytocalcite121.2~5.3−0.2~−4.6
(−1.7)
64.1~140.7
(95.6)
0.4~7.3
(2.85)
4.24~9.07
(6.91)
0.954~1.026 (0.984)
003b1barytocalcite101.0~2.9−0.2~−5.0
(−2.3)
102.3~185.7 (142.3)0.4~7.9
(3.78)
7.51~16.89 (11.07)0.918~0.992 (0.953)
003b2barytocalcite271.3~8.5−1.3~−12.3
(−5.7)
66.1~136.7
(85)
3.1~16.2
(8.48)
5.12~14.87
(8.17)
0.957~1.093 (1.027)
004b4witherite141.0~2.9−0.1~−21.0
(−8.4)
68.3~138.3
(88.7)
0.2~23.0
(9.51)
5.08~11.78
(8.18)
0.955~1.141 (1.036)
006b2witherite151.0~5.0−0.1~−10.6
(−3.2)
54.2~162.7
(100.8)
0.2~14.6
(6)
5.13~17.35
(8.64)
0.967~1.055 (1.001)
Total 1111.0~7.5−0.1~−21.0
(−4.1)
54.2~185.7
(101.3)
0.2~23.0
(5.69)
3.89~17.35
(8.63)
0.918~1.141 (0.995)
N = number of inclusions analyzed, Tm ice = last melting ice temperature, Th = homogenization temperature.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, J.; Liang, F.; Wang, C.; Tian, Y.; Hu, Y.; Liu, H.; Xia, Z.; Yuan, C.; Han, K.; Zhou, S. Formation Conditions of Early Cambrian Witherite (BaCO3) Deposit in Chongqing: Implications for Differential Oceanic Changes. Minerals 2025, 15, 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15090978

AMA Style

Jiang J, Liang F, Wang C, Tian Y, Hu Y, Liu H, Xia Z, Yuan C, Han K, Zhou S. Formation Conditions of Early Cambrian Witherite (BaCO3) Deposit in Chongqing: Implications for Differential Oceanic Changes. Minerals. 2025; 15(9):978. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15090978

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Jie, Feng Liang, Chan Wang, Yaming Tian, Yunxi Hu, Hao Liu, Zhipeng Xia, Changjian Yuan, Kaibin Han, and Susu Zhou. 2025. "Formation Conditions of Early Cambrian Witherite (BaCO3) Deposit in Chongqing: Implications for Differential Oceanic Changes" Minerals 15, no. 9: 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15090978

APA Style

Jiang, J., Liang, F., Wang, C., Tian, Y., Hu, Y., Liu, H., Xia, Z., Yuan, C., Han, K., & Zhou, S. (2025). Formation Conditions of Early Cambrian Witherite (BaCO3) Deposit in Chongqing: Implications for Differential Oceanic Changes. Minerals, 15(9), 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15090978

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop