Correction: Wang et al. Age, Genesis, and Tectonic Setting of the Serbian Čukaru Peki Copper Deposit in Timok Ore Cluster Area, Eastern Europe: Constraints from Zircon U-Pb Dating, Pyrite Re-Os Dating, and Geochemical Data. Minerals 2025, 15, 1178

Title Correction

The title in the original publication [1] included an error in the type of the Re-Os dating, i.e., the word ‘Molybdenite Re-Os Dating’ should read as ‘Pyrite Re-Os Dating’. The error was due to an oversight by the first author, who was responsible for writing and editing the manuscript. Although the Re-Os experiment was conducted by a co-author, the first author mistakenly thought the tested mineral was molybdenite, not realizing it was pyrite until later. The correct title appears below:

Age, Genesis, and Tectonic Setting of the Serbian Čukaru Peki Copper Deposit in Timok Ore Cluster Area, Eastern Europe: Constraints from Zircon U-Pb Dating, Pyrite Re-Os Dating, and Geochemical Data

Text Correction

Following the correction of the title, the changes have been made in the abstract, keywords, and in the main text of the original publication:

The changes made in the Abstract should read as follows:

To complement the available research, this study focuses on andesites from the Čukaru Peki area in Serbia and integrates zircon U-Pb dating, pyrite Re-Os isotopic analysis, and whole-rock geochemical analysis.

Consistently, the pyrite isochron age (81.46 ± 0.60 Ma, MSWD = 1.30) constrains the mineralization event to the same period.

Keywords should read as follows:

zircon U-Pb dating; pyrite Re-Os isotopic dating; Čukaru Peki copper deposit; Vardar Ocean crustal exhumation model

Section 1. Introduction, Paragraph 4, and should read as follows:

This study focuses on the Čukaru Peki deposit within the Timok Ore Cluster Area of the ABTS Metallogenic Belt, in which systematic investigations—including zircon U-Pb geochronology, pyrite Re-Os isotope analysis, and whole-rock major and trace element geochemistry—are conducted on the andesites in this area.

Section 3. Materials and Methods, Paragraph 2 and should read as follows:

All analyses—including zircon U-Pb dating, pyrite Re-Os isotope dating, and major and trace element analyses—were conducted on the samples at Beijing GeoAnalysis Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).

Section 3. Materials and Methods, Paragraph 4 and should read as follows:

Following pollution-free crushing, separation, and purification of the raw samples, pyrite single mineral test samples with a purity greater than 98% were obtained, with the grain size maintained below 2 mm.

Section 4. Results, Section 4.2. Metallogenic and Petrogenic Ages, Paragraph 3 and should read as follows:

In this study, pyrite samples for Re-Os isotopic dating were collected from four mineralized altered rocks at different depths in the Čukaru Peki copper deposit, with sample numbers CPZK06, CPZK08, CPZK09, and CPZK11, and elevations (meters above sea level, m a.s.l.) of 810.9 m, 1317 m, 1426 m, and 1218 m, respectively.

Their model ages range from 82.53 ± 0.85 Ma to 122.90 ± 1.40 Ma, and the isochron age is 81.46 ± 0.60 Ma (MSWD = 1.30) (Figure 8), indicating that the pyrite mineralization occurred during the Late Cretaceous.

Section 5. Discussion, Section 5.1. Magmatic Rock Formation Ages and Mineralization Ages, Paragraph 2, and should read as follows:

In addition, the isochron age of pyrite (81.46 ± 0.60 Ma, MSWD = 1.30) represents its formation age.

Section 6. Conclusions, Point 1, and should read as follows:

Late Cretaceous Mineralization and Petrogenesis: Zircon U–Pb dating of andesite samples from the Čukaru Peki deposit, Serbia, yielded weighted mean ages of 83.5 ± 1.3 Ma and 83.5 ± 0.84 Ma, while pyrite Re–Os isochron dating yielded a mineralization age of 81.46 ± 0.60 Ma.

Figure and Table Caption Correction

Following the correction of the title, and the changes made in the abstract, keywords, and in the main text of the original publication, the caption of Figure 8 and Table A2 have been updated accordingly, and should read as follows:

• Figure 8. ¹⁸⁷Os/¹⁸⁸Os Diagram of Pyrite from the Čukaru Peki Deposit.
• Table A2. Re-Os isotopic analyses of pyrite separates from the Čukaru Peki deposit.

Table Correction

Following the aforementioned corrections, Table A2 has been corrected accordingly and appears below:

Table A2. Re-Os isotopic analyses of pyrite separates from the Čukaru Peki deposit.

Sample Name	Sample No.	Sample Weight (g)	Re ng/g		Common Os (ng/g)		Os187ng/g		187Re/188Os		187Os/188Os		Model Age
			Measured Value	σ	Measured Value	σ	Measured Value	σ	Measured Value	σ	Measured Value	σ	Measured Value	σ
Pyrite	CPZK06	0.60052	1.623	0.012	0.0046	0.0000	0.00166	0.00001	1690.0	17.0	2.740	0.006	97.37	1.00
Pyrite	CPZK08	0.30041	386.8	2.900	0.025	0.0002	0.334	0.002	73,734	764	101.3	0.2	82.53	0.850
Pyrite	CPZK09	0.10733	41.49	0.31	0.67	0.002	0.0535	0.0005	300.10	3.60	0.6170	0.002	122.9	1.40
Pyrite	CPZK11	0.30181	101.6	0.80	0.030	0.0002	0.0913	0.0007	16,266	166	23.26	0.04	85.75	0.870

Table A2. Re-Os isotopic analyses of pyrite separates from the Čukaru Peki deposit.

Sample Name	Sample No.	Sample Weight (g)	Re ng/g		Common Os (ng/g)		Os187ng/g		187Re/188Os		187Os/188Os		Model Age
			Measured Value	σ	Measured Value	σ	Measured Value	σ	Measured Value	σ	Measured Value	σ	Measured Value	σ
Pyrite	CPZK06	0.60052	1.623	0.012	0.0046	0.0000	0.00166	0.00001	1690.0	17.0	2.740	0.006	97.37	1.00
Pyrite	CPZK08	0.30041	386.8	2.900	0.025	0.0002	0.334	0.002	73,734	764	101.3	0.2	82.53	0.850
Pyrite	CPZK09	0.10733	41.49	0.31	0.67	0.002	0.0535	0.0005	300.10	3.60	0.6170	0.002	122.9	1.40
Pyrite	CPZK11	0.30181	101.6	0.80	0.030	0.0002	0.0913	0.0007	16,266	166	23.26	0.04	85.75	0.870

The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.