Next Article in Journal
Study of Detection Limits of Carbonate Phases in Mixtures with Basaltic-like Fine Regolith in the MIR (1–5.5 µm) Spectral Range
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of Calcium Carbonate as a Controlled Release Carrier for Therapeutic Drugs
Previous Article in Journal
Geology, Fluid Inclusions, and C–H–O–S–Pb Isotope Geochemistry of Pb–Zn Deposits within the Tuotuohe Region of the Tibetan Plateau: Implications for Ore Genesis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on the Combined Behaviour of Montmorillonite and Carbonate Mineralizing Bacteria on Lead Retention and Fixation

1
Fundamental Science on Nuclear Wastes and Environmental Safety Laboratory, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
2
School of Environment and Resource, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
3
School of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2023, 13(6), 763; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13060763
Submission received: 25 April 2023 / Revised: 22 May 2023 / Accepted: 28 May 2023 / Published: 31 May 2023

Abstract

:
Heavy metal pollution management is a global environmental problem that poses a great threat to the ecological environment. Adsorption and biomineralization are considered to be the two most promising heavy metal pollution remediation techniques among the numerous available ones. In this work, a combined heavy metal removal system was constructed employing the adsorption of montmorillonite and the mineralization of carbonate mineralizing bacteria to expand their application potential for controlling heavy metal water pollution. Analysis of changes in pH, CO32− concentration, Pb2+ concentration in the liquid phase, and changes in microscopic morphology, mineral phase, and functional group on sedimentary minerals was done to study the retention and fixation behaviour of montmorillonite and carbonate mineralizing bacteria on Pb2+. The results show that the liquid phase pH may be slightly altered by the ions dissolved in montmorillonite. Based on the conditions of montmorillonite and carbonate mineralizing bacteria functioning separately, the elimination of Pb2+ may reach 35.31% and 45.75%, respectively. However, when montmorillonite is combined with carbonate mineralizing bacteria, which is the heavy metal removal system constructed in this study, montmorillonite can buffer part of the Pb2+ rapidly and reduce its biotoxicity. Subsequently, these buffered Pb2+ are gradually desorbed by carbonate mineralizing bacteria and removed by the effect of mineralized deposition. Results from SEM, FTIR, and XRD indicate that Pb2+ is primarily removed from the liquid phase as rod-shaped PbCO3. It is worth noting that this process is able to significantly increase the removal of Pb2+ up to 90.06%. In addition, the presence of carbonate mineralizing bacteria can increase montmorillonite’s desorption rate to over 81%, greatly enhancing its capacity for reuse. Therefore, our research work contributes to expanding the potential of montmorillonite and carbonate mineralizing bacteria in the treatment of heavy metal-polluted waters.

1. Introduction

Lead (Pb), a heavy metal with a high ecological threat, is found in the environment largely in the form of divalent compounds [1]. The nuclear industry, the petrochemical industry, mineral mining and smelting, coal combustion, metal plating, etc., are all significant anthropogenic sources supplementary to natural sources such as the weathering and dissolution of rocks and minerals [2,3]. It is worth noting that lead is highly bioavailable, which means that it is easily absorbed and collected by organisms. Nonetheless, this bioaccumulation effect can exert a certain level of toxicity on biological organs and tissues [4,5]. Lead in the blood, for instance, has a significant detrimental influence on adults’ cardiovascular, neurological, and internal organs once a certain concentration level is reached. Similarly, it also has a bad impact on children’s cognitive capacities, physical development, and hearing levels [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Furthermore, lead is an important trigger for cell carcinogenesis; although they do not directly cause cancer, they are a mutagen for cancer development [12,13,14]. Early studies have shown a strong association between the development of lung cancer and chronic exposure to lead [15,16]. For example, Anttila [17] et al. found that the probability of developing lung cancer was eight times greater in those with blood lead levels at or above 1.0 μM than in the general population. Therefore, the treatment of lead pollution is very critical work.
Adsorption has been identified by a variety of researchers as an effective pollution management technique for the treatment of diverse heavy metal-contaminated wastewater for years of effort [18,19,20]. In their extensive research endeavours, researchers have discovered an array of natural adsorbent materials with excellent capabilities. One of the minerals of interest is montmorillonite (MMT), which is formed through the weathering of volcanic ash, boasting both a large specific surface area and superior cation exchange capacity while also being widely and affordably available [19,21,22,23]. In early research work, researchers found that montmorillonite performed well in the removal of toxic metals such as Cu, Fe, As, Cr, Co, Pb, Ni, Zn, Cd, Mn, etc. [21]. For example, Kahkha [24] et al. reported that sodium montmorillonite with appropriate modification treatment could remove almost total Cd, Zn, Pb, and Ni from wastewater; Essebaai [25] et al. found that the adsorption capacity of montmorillonite for Cr(III) could reach 7.5 mg/g in laboratory conditions. Apart from adsorption, biomineralization has also been widely researched for the treatment of heavy metal pollution [26,27]. Some studies have shown that practically all microorganisms have the capacity to biomineralize, and their presence is crucial for the emergence of natural minerals [28,29]. Recently, mineralizing microorganisms have been found to convert various toxic and harmful heavy metal ions (e.g., Cd, Pb, Zn, etc.) in their surroundings from ionic to solid compounds under the appropriate environment, which significantly reduces their transportability and bio-availability in the ecosystem, resulting in a reduction in their ecological threat to the environment and organisms [30,31,32]. In addition, the operation, cost, ecology, and efficiency of this biomineralization process are also very favourable, allowing for its widespread use in a variety of disciplines, such as the remediation of heavy metal contamination [26,33,34,35]. Among numerous mineralizing microorganisms, carbonate mineralizing bacteria have demonstrated excellent removal efficacy for various heavy metal ions, making them a promising candidate for the treatment of heavy metal pollution [36]. Some examples include the removal of Zn, Pb, and Cd up to 94.83%, 98.71%, and 97.15%, respectively, by carbonate mineralizing bacteria isolated from calcareous soil environments and the removal of Cd and Ni up to 96% and 89%, respectively, by carbonate mineralizing bacteria screened in farm soil environments [30,37].
The combined remediation of heavy metal pollution by montmorillonite and carbonate mineralizing bacteria has rarely been reported, despite the fact that numerous research works have focused on the modification of montmorillonite to improve the adsorption efficiency of heavy metals and the remediation effect of various carbonate mineralizing bacteria on heavy metal pollution in various environmental factors. Therefore, this study aims to construct a composite system of montmorillonite and carbonate mineralizing bacteria using the rapid adsorption and buffering effect of montmorillonite and the efficient fixation effect of carbonate mineralizing bacteria to explore its retention and fixation behavior and removal effect on Pb2+, as well as to preliminarily evaluate the application potential of the composite system of montmorillonite-carbonate mineralizing bacteria (MMT-CMB) in the treatment of heavy metal pollution.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Montmorillonite and Its Purification

The Altai region in Xinjiang provided the montmorillonite utilised in the research. It was purified by continuously stirring and centrifugation in a deionized water solution before the experiments. After being purified, the samples were dried in a drying oven (DHG-9140A Shanghai, China) at 60 °C before being ground to 200 mesh [38,39].

2.2. Experimental Strains and Cultures

The strain used in this experiment is Klebsiella sp. CRRI-81_WR13A, which was selected from the purple soil of the Sichuan basin in China. The medium for selecting and cultivating carbonate mineralizing bacteria consists of the following components: urea (20 g/L), protein peptone (10 g/L), and NaCl (5 g/L). All of the aforementioned ingredients, with the exception of urea, were combined with deionized water for the cultivation of microorganisms. The pH was subsequently corrected to 7.0. The urea solution was added to the medium via a water filtration membrane (0.22 μm) after being sterilised and cooled. Finally, the experimental bacterial strain was inoculated into the medium at a volume ratio of 1:100 (v:v) and cultured at 30 °C in a shaking incubator (ZWY-211C, Zhicheng, Shanghai, China) at 120 rpm for subsequent experiments.

2.3. Pb2+ Retention and Fixation by Montmorillonite and Carbonate Mineralizing Bacteria

For the experiment, protein peptone (10 g/L), NaCl (5 g/L), and Pb2+ 500 mg/L (Pb(NO3)2 0.7993 g) were weighed in deionised water. Urea was then added using the above-mentioned procedure after the mixture had been autoclaved and cooled. At the same time, montmorillonite (20 g/L) was added to the medium, and the experimental group was inoculated with the carbonate mineralizing bacteria reaching the logarithmic growth phase at a volume ratio of 1:100 (v:v), while the control group remained non-inoculated state. Finally, they were placed in a constant temperature shaking incubator (at 30 °C, 150 rpm).
During the experiment, samples were collected from the medium at 0 h, 2 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, 5 d, 7 d, 15 d, and 30 d and were centrifuged at 4000 r/min for 1 min. Firstly, the Multiparameter tester (Seven Excellence, Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland) was used to test the pH of the supernatant; secondly, Pb2+ concentrations of the supernatant were measured by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES ICAP6500, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), with a detection limit of 10−9–10−6 g/L; finally, the CO32− concentration in the liquid phase was determined by titration (DZT 0064.49-1993). Moreover, the precipitate obtained after centrifugation was washed three times with deionised water and dried in a drying oven at 60 °C. Subsequently, Pb2+ dissolved by ion exchange was determined via the method described above.
In the end, appropriate samples were collected and processed by drying and grinding (100 mesh). Following this, the samples were examined by X-ray Diffraction (XRD, X’Pert PRO, PANalytical, Almelo, Netherlands) in the range 3–80°, and the data were analysed by Jade 6.0 to determine the change in mineral phases before and after the experiment; Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Nico-let5700, Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to record and analyse the changes in mineral functional groups over the range 4000–400 cm−1 before and after the experiment. In addition, a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Ultra55, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) was used to determine and analyse the microscopic morphology of the sedimentary minerals.

2.4. Analysis of Data

The rate of pH change (n1), Pb2+ removal rate (n2), Pb2+ removal rate (n3), montmorillonite retention rate (n4) and carbonate mineralizing bacteria mineralization rate (n5) were calculated during the experiment as follows:
n 1 = Δ p H Δ t = p H t 2 p H t 1 t 2 t 1
n 2 = Δ C Δ t = C t 2 C t 1 t 2 t 1
n 3 = C 0 C 1 C 0 × 100 %
n 4 = C 0 C 2 C 0 × 100 %
n 5 = 1 n 1 n 2
where ∆t is the unit time of action, ∆pH is the change in pH per unit time, ∆C is the change in Pb2+ concentration per unit time, C0 is the initial Pb2+ concentration in the liquid phase, C1 is the Pb2+ concentration in the liquid phase during the experiment, and C2 is the Pb2+ concentration adsorbed by montmorillonite in Section 2.2.

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of pH Changes

The variation of liquid phase pH is shown in Figure 1. It is visually observable that the pH of the liquid phase increases to varying degrees throughout the entire reaction (Figure 1a), whether carbonate mineralizing bacteria is added or not. Meanwhile, all samples show an increase in the pH of the liquid phase to around 7.9 at 1 d. The pH becomes stable when montmorillonite works alone, while it shows an increasing trend from 1–7 d when montmorillonite and carbonate mineralizing bacteria work together and stabilizes at around 8.54. This means that montmorillonite has a moderating effect on pH; it is noteworthy that the rate of pH change (Figure 1b) increases to some extent from 1 d when carbonate mineralizing bacteria is inoculated. Especially from 3 to 7 d, indicating that the effect of montmorillonite on the pH of the liquid phase is primarily reflected in the early stages of the experiment, whereas the effect of carbonate mineralizing bacteria is primarily observed in the middle of the experiment. This is largely caused by the low number of microbial cells in the initial period. However, in earlier research (Figure 1c), it was found that without the addition of Pb2+, the liquid phase pH stabilized at around 9.5 after only 60 h. This stabilization not only occurred more quickly than the combined effect of montmorillonite and carbonate mineralizing bacteria but also resulted in a significantly higher pH level after stabilization. This indicates that the growth of carbonate-mineralizing bacteria may have been affected to a certain extent.

3.2. Analysis of the Variation of CO32− Concentration

The concentration of CO32− in the liquid phase environment is an effective predictor of the experimental strains’ mineralization characteristics. Based on the fact that CO32− created by the carbonate mineralizing bacteria is continually mineralized with Pb2+ during the mineralization process, the data shown in Figure 2. depict the residual concentration of CO32−. Compared to the control group, the concentration of CO32− increases rapidly and reaches 105.35 mg/L at 7 d following the inclusion of carbonate mineralizing bacteria, while it increases to 115.03 mg/L slowly later, indicating that the main source of CO32− is produced by carbonate mineralizing bacteria. This also means that when microorganisms reach a certain population level, they dramatically enhance their metabolic rate and are able to produce enormous amounts of CO32− for mineralization. At the end of the experiment, mineralization deposition is finished, but some CO32− is still present in the liquid phase. This may be caused by nutrient restrictions that make it difficult for microbes to continue decomposing urea to produce CO32−.

3.3. Analysis of the Variation of Pb2+ Concentration

The change in Pb2+ concentration in the liquid phase environment is the primary factor used to assess the performance of the montmorillonite-carbonate mineralizing bacteria system built for this study. Montmorillonite shows a moderate effect in removing Pb2+, while the addition of carbonate mineralizing bacteria improves its removal efficacy, as seen in Figure 3a. Due to the flocculation of organic material in the medium, the initial concentration of Pb2+ determined is 327.4 mg/L, which is lower than the initial concentration of 500 mg/L planned for the experiment. At this initial concentration, when working alone, montmorillonite makes the concentration of Pb2+ gradually reduce and stabilise at around 216.40 mg/L after 7 d. However, when both montmorillonite and carbonate mineralizing bacteria are present, the Pb2+ concentration can be significantly reduced to 32.52 mg/L. The experimental procedure (Figure 3b) shows that the highest rate of Pb2+ adsorption by montmorillonite, which reached 815.43 mg/L·d−1, was achieved at 2 h, regardless of whether or not carbonate mineralizing bacteria were included. This is the highest rate of Pb2+ adsorption observed for montmorillonite. Furthermore, the addition of carbonate mineralizing bacteria results in a rapid decrease in the concentration of Pb2+ within 0.083-7d. Meanwhile, the removal rate of Pb2+ is just 35.31% in the control group, and it has been progressively declining since 15 d of the experiment. However, the removal rate of Pb2+ in the montmorillonite-carbonate mineralizing bacteria system keeps increasing, and the removal rate of Pb2+ is up to 90.06% at 30 d. However, previous research (Figure 3c) had shown that when the initial Pb2+ concentration was at 414.2mg/L, the removal rate of Pb2+ was less than 50% after 168 h of the only action of carbonate mineralizing bacteria. However, during the same time frame, the addition of montmorillonite to the combination of carbonate mineralizing bacteria resulted in an 80% removal rate of Pb2+, indicating a significant enhancement in Pb2+ removal rate with the addition of montmorillonite.

3.4. Analysis of the Variation of Pb2+ Fugitive Content in MMT-CMB Systems

In the montmorillonite-carbonate mineralizing bacteria system constructed in this study, Pb2+ can be divided into three components: the residual component in the liquid phase, the retained component in montmorillonite, and the mineralized component in carbonate mineralizing bacteria. Figure 4 shows the variation of Pb2+ amounts in each fraction with time. In terms of the overall effect, the retention effect of montmorillonite on Pb2+ is markedly lower than the mineralizing bacteria, which means that carbonate mineralizing bacteria dominate the removal process of Pb2+. Furthermore, the amount of Pb2+ remaining in the liquid phase and the retention of montmorillonite gradually decreased as the experiment progressed, while the proportion of Pb2+ mineralized by carbonate mineralizing bacteria showed a gradual improvement. The components of the residual, the retained, and the mineralized are 2.69%, 85.29%, and 12.02%, respectively, at 7 d, which means that part of the retained fraction of montmorillonite is transferred to the mineralized fraction by carbonate mineralizing bacteria. This indicates that the carbonate mineralizing bacteria can not only remove Pb2+ from the liquid phase but also desorb most of the Pb2+ adsorbed by montmorillonite and remove it by mineralization deposition.

3.5. Analysis of Sediment SEM in the MMT-CMB System

The SEM patterns of the sediments after the work are shown in Figure 5a–c. Compared to the control group, without the action of carbonate mineralization bacteria (Figure 5a), some bars and grains of crystals appear in the sediment (Figure 5b,c), with a size of 1–3 μm, and the surface of these crystals is relatively smooth. This result is relatively consistent with our earlier study on the mineralization products of carbonate mineralizing bacteria (Figure 5d).

3.6. Analysis of FTIR and XRD Profiles of Sedimentary Minerals

3.6.1. FTIR Analysis

FTIR of the deposited minerals (Figure 6a) shows that, compared to the control group, new absorption peaks appear around 1472 cm−1, 850 cm−1, and 798 cm−1 for the experimental montmorillonite minerals, corresponding to the anti-symmetric stretching vibration absorption peak, the out-of-plane bending vibration absorption peak and the in-plane bending vibration absorption peak for CO32−, respectively [40,41].

3.6.2. XRD Analysis

Similarly, the XRD patterns of the sedimentary minerals show that the characteristic diffraction peaks of PbCO3 are present in the sedimentary minerals after Pb2+ has been treated with montmorillonite and carbonate mineralizing bacteria. This result further indicates that the Pb2+ in solution has been converted to carbonate by the carbonate mineralizing bacteria and then removed from the liquid phase.

4. Discussion

4.1. Montmorillonite Structure and Adsorption Properties

Montmorillonite is a typical dioctahedral structure, which contains a quantity of Na2+, Mg2+, Al3+, Fe3+, Ca2+ and other cations inside [42,43,44]. They have a certain hydrophilicity and are capable of hydration, as well as hydrolysis in an aqueous environment. When montmorillonite enters a water environment, the cations contained within it are able to enter the aqueous environment. Due to the hydrolysis of the cations, especially the Al3+, some amount of hydroxide can be released, making the water alkaline. As shown in Figure 1a of this study, the addition of montmorillonite raises the pH of the liquid environment to around 7.79.
The isomorphous substitution of ions occurs on the tetrahedra and octahedra in montmorillonite; for example, Al3+ can replace Si4+ and Mg2+ in the tetrahedral and octahedral lamellae, respectively, which gives montmorillonite a permanent negative charge or charge layer and gives it a certain adsorption capacity [18,44,45]. However, under certain conditions, the effectiveness of natural montmorillonite in removing heavy metal ions through adsorption is not very high. Moreover, the distinct chemical properties of heavy metal ions, including their charge and ionic radius, can result in variability in the adsorption effectiveness of montmorillonite for different metal ions. For instance, Zhao [46] et al. found that at an initial concentration of 1.6g/L of montmorillonite and 100 ppm Sr2+ concentration, the Sr2+ removal rate was only 27.15%. Wang [47] et al. investigated the fixation behaviour of natural Ca-montmorillonite and Na-montmorillonite on heavy metals in tailings, and the results showed that the fixation of Pb2+ was around 5% and 50%, respectively. Similarly, in this study, as shown in Figure 3a, under conditions where the initial Pb2+ concentration was 327.4 mg/L, the maximum removal rate of Pb2+ by montmorillonite was only 35.30%. Hu [48] et al. studied the adsorption properties of montmorillonite in the presence of various heavy metal ions and showed that the adsorption capacity of montmorillonite for Pb2+, Cu2+ and Cd2+ was Pb2+ > Cu2+ > Cd2+ as a result of electronegativity. Moreover, as shown in Figure 3a, it can be deduced that the concentration of Pb2+ in the liquid phase experienced a certain degree of reduction under the influence of montmorillonite. However, the concentration of Pb2+ exhibited an increasing trend from 15 d, indicating that the adsorption of Pb2+ by montmorillonite lacks long-term stability and is susceptible to desorption.

4.2. Mechanism of Combined Removal by Montmorillonite-Carbonate Mineralizing Bacteria

In the current study, the combined effects of montmorillonite and carbonate mineralizing bacteria are mostly responsible for the removal of Pb2+, and the main mechanism is shown in Figure 7. Montmorillonite has a large amount of negative charge in the layer sheet, which has a strong adsorption effect on Pb2+ in the liquid phase. Meanwhile, montmorillonite has strong ion exchange properties. When montmorillonite enters the water column, the Ca2+ and Na+ contained within it will experience ion exchange reactions with Pb2+, and the interlayer ions are transferred to the liquid phase environment while Pb2+ enters the montmorillonite interlayer domain.
At the early stage of the experiment, the contribution of carbonate mineralizing bacteria in the reduction of Pb2+ is relatively small due to the poor biomass and delayed metabolic activity of the microorganisms. However, once the population of carbonate mineralizing bacteria reached a certain level, they participated in the process of Pb2+ removal rapidly. At this moment, montmorillonite has reached adsorption saturation equilibrium, and the carbonate mineralizing bacteria begin to carry out the following re reactions:
CO NH 2 2 + 2 H 2 O U H 2 CO 3 + 2 NH 3
2 NH 3 + 2 H 2 O 2 NH 4 + + 2 OH
H 2 CO 3 HCO 3 + H +
HCO 3 + H + + 2 OH CO 3 2 + 2 H 2 O
Pb 2 + + CO 3 2 PbCO 3
Firstly, carbonic acid and ammonia are produced by the decomposition of urea during the development of carbonate mineralizing bacteria (Equation (6)); subsequently, ammonia dissolves in water and transforms into NH4+ with the release of OH, which results in the liquid phase environment to increase in alkalinity (Equation (7)); then, the HCO3 ionised from H2CO3 is continuously converted to CO32− in an alkaline environment (Equations (8) and (9)), which reacts in the reaction of the CO32− with the Pb2+ in the environment as well as those adsorbed on the surface of the carbonate mineralizing bacteria to form carbonate precipitates (Equation (10)) [49,50,51]. During this period, the CO32− generated by the above reaction is also continuously combined with the Pb2+ adsorbed on the surface of the montmorillonite and then deposited, thus allowing the montmorillonite to be desorbed. However, various functional groups are present in the microorganism and their metabolites, including carboxyl, ammonia, hydroxyl, sulfhydryl and phosphate [52,53,54]. When they come into contact with montmorillonite, they can indirectly modify the treatment of montmorillonite, causing it to have more adsorption sites and stronger adsorption capacity, thus enhancing the adsorption of heavy metal ions by montmorillonite. Moreover, the increase in pH within the environment also enhances the increased adsorption of metal ions by montmorillonite [55,56]. Hence, at the end of the experiment, the montmorillonite still contained some Pb2+.

4.3. The Influence of Montmorillonite on Carbonate-Mineralizing Bacterial Growth

It can be seen from the above results that montmorillonite performs a crucial buffering function in the Pb2+ removal experiments. In other words, montmorillonite reduces the concentration of heavy metal ions to a certain extent in a short time through its adsorption and ion exchange. Subsequently, the continuous mineralization and deposition by carbonate mineralizing bacteria reduce the concentration of the Pb2+, while the continuously produced CO32− combines with the Pb2+ adsorbed by the montmorillonite, converting the Pb2+ to PbCO3 and desorbing the montmorillonite. High concentrations of heavy metal ions (especially Pb2+) have been proven to have certain harmful effects on organisms in a large number of early investigations [50,57]. In previous studies, we found that when exposed to a liquid environment containing Pb2+, the removal rate of Pb2+ by carbonate mineralizing bacteria alone was less than 50% (Figure 3c). However, in the montmorillonite-carbonate mineralizing bacteria system, the removal rate of Pb2+ reached 90.06%, with a maximum contribution rate of 87.34% by the carbonate mineralizing bacteria (Figure 4). This result confirms that montmorillonite can effectively decrease the biotoxicity associated with Pb2+, highlighting the merits of the montmorillonite-carbonate mineralizing bacteria system in terms of Pb2+ removal. Furthermore, compared to the normal growth conditions where carbonate mineralizing bacteria can raise the pH of the culture medium to around 9.5 (Figure 1c), the liquid phase pH in this study only slightly elevates to around 8.5 (Figure 1a). This may be attributed to two factors: the inhibitory effect of Pb2+ toxicity on the growth of carbonate mineralization bacteria and the consumption of HCO3 due to its transformation to CO32−. The SEM profile (Figure 5b,c) illustrates the presence of numerous crystals in the sedimentary minerals, and XRD results (Figure 6b) also indicate the occurrence of PbCO3. This further confirms that Pb2+ is ultimately transformed from its ionic state to a solid state through the mineralization process of carbonate-mineralizing bacteria and thus removed from the liquid phase environment. This indicates that the montmorillonite-carbonate mineralizing bacteria system constructed in this study allows for the re-recovery of montmorillonite as well as improving the mineralization performance of the carbonate mineralizing bacteria.

4.4. Performance Evaluation of MMT-CMB System for Heavy Metal Pollution Treatment

Based on the aforementioned research, the system constructed with montmorillonite and carbonate mineralizing bacteria has demonstrated a superior removal effect on Pb2+ in comparison to their individual effects. Modification and intercalation of montmorillonite are currently key research areas which have demonstrated a marked enhancement in the adsorption ability of montmorillonite through these processes. For example, Wang [47] et al. found that the removal efficiency of Pb2+ and Mn2+ increased from about 5% and 8% initially to 80% and 28%, respectively, after montmorillonite was modified by Na2CO3. Ma [55] et al. found that montmorillonite modified with sodium lignosulfonate could increase the adsorption of Pb2+ from an initial 40 mg/g to about 52.5 mg/g, while the adsorption of Cu2+ increased from an initial 6.5 mg/g to about 7.5 mg/g. It is worth noting that while the montmorillonite modification treatment and intercalation treatment can significantly improve its capacity to adsorb heavy metal ions, both the cost of treatment (as mentioned for sodium lignosulfonate) and the modification treatment process could further increase the cost of heavy metal pollution treatment. Moreover, according to the results of this research, it can be inferred that the long-term stability of Pb2+ subsequent to montmorillonite adsorption is relatively inferior. In this study, it was shown that the combined action of montmorillonite and carbonate mineralizing bacteria offers a relatively cost-effective and simpler approach to heavy metal pollution remediation. This approach tackles the risk of environmental re-pollution caused by Pb2+ desorption following montmorillonite adsorption by transforming Pb2+ into insoluble carbonates. Moreover, the desorption of Pb2+ in montmorillonite can enhance its potential for repeated use. Therefore, the utilization of montmorillonite and carbonate mineralizing bacteria for constructing a heavy metal removal system holds promising application prospects. However, considering that the growth of microorganisms and the efficiency of heavy metal ion removal are significantly affected by various environmental factors, such as the co-existence of a large number of other ions in polluted wastewater, which may influence the removal rate of the target ion, this is still an important issue to be addressed in future work. Additionally, the combination of modified montmorillonite or other clay minerals with carbonate mineralizing bacteria to treat heavy metal pollution is another potential direction for further research.

5. Conclusions

In the co-removal of Pb2+ by montmorillonite and carbonate mineralizing bacteria, montmorillonite provided an important buffering role, reducing Pb2+ concentrations and biotoxicity in a short time. The carbonate mineralizing bacteria can not only contribute to the mineralized deposition of Pb2+ in the liquid phase but also release the Pb2+ gradually adsorbed by montmorillonite and remove it. In this study, the Pb2+ removal rate was only 35.31% and 45.75% for montmorillonite and carbonate mineralizing bacteria, respectively. The composite system using montmorillonite and carbonate mineralizing bacteria could significantly increase the Pb2+ removal rate to 90.06% while allowing montmorillonite to be recovered and reused. The results of this study demonstrate significant potential for addressing the problem of heavy metal pollution and thus represent a valuable contribution to the field of environmental research. This study can serve as a useful reference for policy-makers, researchers, and others who are engaged in the search for effective solutions to the problem of heavy metal pollution.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.D.; methodology, Q.D. and F.X.; software, L.W.; validation, W.W. and F.X.; formal analysis, W.W., Y.Z. and F.X.; investigation, Q.D. and R.J.; resources, Q.D.; data curation, W.W. and Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.D.; writing—review and editing, W.W., F.X. and R.J.; visualization, Y.Z. and W.W.; supervision, Q.D.; project administration, Q.D.; funding acquisition, Q.D. and L.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41102212, 42007281).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundations of China for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Qian, X.; Fang, C.; Huang, M.; Achal, V. Characterization of fungal-mediated carbonate precipitation in the biomineralization of chromate and lead from an aqueous solution and soil. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 164, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kushwaha, A.; Hans, N.; Kumar, S.; Rani, R. A critical review on speciation, mobilization and toxicity of lead in soil-microbe-plant system and bioremediation strategies. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 147, 1035–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sevak, P.I.; Pushkar, B.K.; Kapadne, P.N. Lead pollution and bacterial bioremediation: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 4463–4488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pal, A.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Saha, J.; Sarkar, M.; Mandal, P. Bacterial survival strategies and responses under heavy metal stress: A comprehensive overview. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 48, 327–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Prabhakaran, P.; Ashraf, M.A.; Aqma, W.S. Microbial stress response to heavy metals in the environment. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 109862–109877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kumar, A.; Kumar, A.; Cabral-Pinto, M.; Chaturvedi, A.K.; Shabnam, A.A.; Subrahmanyam, G.; Mondal, R.; Gupta, D.K.; Malyan, S.K.; Kumar, S.S.; et al. Lead toxicity: Health hazards, influence on food Chain, and sustainable remediation approaches. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Forsyth, J.E.; Islam, M.S.; Parvez, S.M.; Raqib, R.; Rahman, M.S.; Muehe, E.M.; Fendorf, S.; Luby, S.P. Prevalence of elevated blood lead levels among pregnant women and sources of lead exposure in rural Bangladesh: A case control study. Environ. Res. 2018, 166, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rehman, K.; Fatima, F.; Waheed, I.; Akash, M.S.H. Prevalence of exposure of heavy metals and their impact on health consequences. J. Cell. Biochem. 2018, 119, 157–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zawadzki, M.; Poreba, R.; Gać, P. Mechanisms and toxic effects of lead on the cardiovascular system. Med. Pr. 2006, 57, 543–550. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fu, Z.; Xi, S. The effects of heavy metals on human metabolism. Toxicol. Mech. Methods 2020, 30, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Staessen, J.; Bruaux, P.; Claeys-Thoreau, F.; DePlaen, P.; Ducoffre, G.; Lauwerys, R.; Roels, H.; Rondia, D.; Sartor, F.; Amery, A. The relationship between blood pressure and environmental exposure to lead and cadmium in Belgium. Environ. Health Perspect. 1988, 78, 127–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lam, T.V.; Agovino, P.; Niu, X.; Roché, L. Linkage study of cancer risk among lead-exposed workers in New Jersey. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 372, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Steenland, K.; Boffetta, P. Lead and Cancer in Humans: Where Are We Now? Am. J. Ind. Med. 2000, 38, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Silbergeld, E.K. Facilitative mechanisms of lead as a carcinogen. Mutat. Res./Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2003, 533, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nersesyan, A.; Kundi, M.; Waldherr, M.; Setayesh, T.; Mišík, M.; Wultsch, G.; Filipic, M.; Barcelos, G.R.M.; Knasmueller, S. Results of micronucleus assays with individuals who are occupationally and environmentally exposed to mercury, lead and cadmium. Mutat. Res./Rev. Mutat. Res. 2016, 770, 119–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rhee, J.; Graubard, B.I.; Purdue, M.P. Blood lead levels and lung cancer mortality: An updated analysis of NHANES II and III. Cancer Med. 2021, 10, 4066–4074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Anttila, A.; Heikkilä, P.; Pukkala, E.; Nykyri, E.; Kauppinen, T.; Hernberg, S.; Hemminki, K. Excess lung cancer among workers exposed to lead. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health 1995, 21, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, R.; Chen, Q.; Zhou, Q.; Xi, Y.; Zhu, J.; He, H. Adsorbents based on montmorillonite for contaminant removal from water: A review. Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 123, 239–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhao, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Xu, F.; Li, M. Functional wastepaper-montmorillonite composite aerogel for Cd2+ adsorption. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 38644–38653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gupta, S.S.; Bhattacharyya, K.G. Adsorption of heavy metals on kaolinite and montmorillonite: A review. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 6698–6723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bhattacharyya, K.G.; Gupta, S.S. Adsorption of a few heavy metals on natural and modified kaolinite and montmorillonite: A review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 140, 114–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Singh, B.K.; Um, W. Application of Clay Materials for Sorption of Radionuclides from Waste Solutions. Minerals 2023, 13, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gu, S.; Kang, X.; Wang, L.; Lichtfouse, E.; Wang, C. Clay mineral adsorbents for heavy metal removal from wastewater: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 629–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kahkha, M.R.R.; Kaykhaii, M.; Kahkha, B.R.; Khosravi, H.; Tohidlou, E. Simultaneous Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewater Using Modified Sodium Montmorillonite Nanoclay. Anal. Sci. 2020, 36, 1039–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Essebaai, H.; Lgaz, H.; Alrashdi, A.A.; Habsaoui, A.; Lebkiri, A.; Marzak, S.; Rifi, E.H. Green and eco-friendly montmorillonite clay for the removal of Cr(III) metal ion from aqueous environment. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 19, 2443–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lin, H.; Zhou, M.; Li, B.; Dong, Y. Mechanisms, application advances and future perspectives of microbial-induced heavy metal precipitation: A review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2023, 178, 105544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, S.; Liu, T.; Xiao, X.; Luo, S. Advances in microbial remediation for heavy metal treatment: A mini review. J. Leather Sci. Eng. 2021, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, J.; Liu, B.; Zhong, M.; Jing, C.; Guo, B. Research status and development of microbial induced calcium carbonate mineralization technology. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0271761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dauphin, Y. A Brief History of Biomineralization Studies. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2023, 9, 1774–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jalilvand, N.; Akhgar, A.; Alikhani, H.A.; Rahmani, H.A.; Rejali, F. Removal of Heavy Metals Zinc, Lead, and Cadmium by Biomineralization of Urease-Producing Bacteria Isolated from Iranian Mine Calcareous Soils. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2020, 20, 206–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dhami, N.K.; Quirin, M.E.C.; Mukherjee, A. Carbonate biomineralization and heavy metal remediation by calcifying fungi isolated from karstic caves. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 103, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kim, J.-H.; Lee, J.-Y. An optimum condition of MICP indigenous bacteria with contaminated wastes of heavy metal. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2019, 21, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Achal, V.; Pan, X.; Fu, Q.; Zhang, D. Biomineralization based remediation of As(III) contaminated soil by Sporosarcina ginsengisoli. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 201–202, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Maity, J.P.; Chen, G.-S.; Huang, Y.-H.; Sun, A.-C.; Chen, C.-Y. Ecofriendly Heavy Metal Stabilization: Microbial Induced Mineral Precipitation (MIMP) and Biomineralization for Heavy Metals within the Contaminated Soil by Indigenous Bacteria. Geomicrobiol. J. 2019, 36, 612–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kumar, A.; Song, H.-W.; Mishra, S.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Zhang, Q.-R.; Yu, Z.-G. Application of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) techniques to remove heavy metal in the natural environment: A critical review. Chemosphere 2023, 318, 137894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Qiao, S.; Zeng, G.; Wang, X.; Dai, C.; Sheng, M.; Chen, Q.; Xu, F.; Xu, H. Multiple heavy metals immobilization based on microbially induced carbonate precipitation by ureolytic bacteria and the precipitation patterns exploration. Chemosphere 2021, 274, 129661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khadim, H.J.; Ammar, S.H.; Ebrahim, S.E. Biomineralization based remediation of cadmium and nickel contaminated wastewater by ureolytic bacteria isolated from barn horses soil. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2019, 14, 100315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhao, Y.; Dong, F.; Dai, Q.; Li, G.; Ma, J. Variation of preserving organic matter bound in interlayer of montmorillonite induced by microbial metabolic process. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 22348–22355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gong, Z.; Liao, L.; Lv, G.; Wang, X. A simple method for physical purification of bentonite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 119, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, Y.-Y.; Yao, Q.-Z.; Li, H.; Zhou, G.-T.; Sheng, Y.-M. Formation of Vaterite Mesocrystals in Biomineral-like Structures and Implication for Biomineralization. Cryst. Growth Des. 2015, 15, 1714–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Han, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhao, H.; Tucker, M.E.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, G.; Zhou, J.; Yin, J.; Zhang, H.; Yan, H. Mechanism of Biomineralization Induced by Bacillus subtilis J2 and Characteristics of the Biominerals. Minerals 2019, 9, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Al Kausor, M.; Gupta, S.S.; Bhattacharyya, K.G.; Chakrabortty, D. Montmorillonite and modified montmorillonite as adsorbents for removal of water soluble organic dyes: A review on current status of the art. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022, 143, 109686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Maged, A.; Iqbal, J.; Kharbish, S.; Ismael, I.S.; Bhatnagar, A. Tuning tetracycline removal from aqueous solution onto activated 2:1 layered clay mineral: Characterization, sorption and mechanistic studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 384, 121320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Fan, Q.; Li, P.; Pan, D. Chapter 1–Radionuclides Sorption on Typical Clay Minerals: Modeling and Spectroscopies. In Interface Science and Technology; Chen, C., Ed.; Emerging Natural and Tailored Nanomaterials for Radioactive Waste Treatment and Environmental Remediation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 29, pp. 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  45. Grančič, P.; Böhm, L.; Gerzabek, M.H.; Tunega, D. On the Nature of Hydrophobic Organic Compound Adsorption to Smectite Minerals Using the Example of Hexachlorobenzene-Montmorillonite Interactions. Minerals 2023, 13, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhao, Y.; Dai, Q.; Dong, F.; Han, L.; Yan, W. Strontium Removal by Montmorillonite–Pseudomonas Fluorescens System. Res. Rev. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 5, 39–45. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang, G.; Cao, W.; Liang, G.; Xiang, J.; Chen, Y.; Liu, H. Leaching Behavior of Heavy Metals from Pb–Zn Tailings and Remediation by Ca- or Na-Montmorillonite. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2023, 234, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hu, C.; Zhu, P.; Cai, M.; Hu, H.; Fu, Q. Comparative adsorption of Pb(II), Cu(II) and Cd(II) on chitosan saturated montmorillonite: Kinetic, thermodynamic and equilibrium studies. Appl. Clay Sci. 2017, 143, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hu, L.; Wang, H.; Xu, P.; Zhang, Y. Biomineralization of hypersaline produced water using microbially induced calcite precipitation. Water Res. 2021, 190, 116753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jiang, N.-J.; Liu, R.; Du, Y.-J.; Bi, Y.-Z. Microbial induced carbonate precipitation for immobilizing Pb contaminants: Toxic effects on bacterial activity and immobilization efficiency. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 672, 722–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bhattacharya, A.; Naik, S.; Khare, S. Harnessing the bio-mineralization ability of urease producing Serratia marcescens and Enterobacter cloacae EMB19 for remediation of heavy metal cadmium (II). J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 215, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Priya, A.; Gnanasekaran, L.; Dutta, K.; Rajendran, S.; Balakrishnan, D.; Soto-Moscoso, M. Biosorption of heavy metals by microorganisms: Evaluation of different underlying mechanisms. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 135957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Li, G.L.; Zhou, C.H.; Fiore, S.; Yu, W.H. Interactions between microorganisms and clay minerals: New insights and broader applications. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 177, 91–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yin, K.; Wang, Q.; Lv, M.; Chen, L. Microorganism remediation strategies towards heavy metals. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 360, 1553–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ma, J.; Khan, M.A.; Xia, M.; Fu, C.; Zhu, S.; Chu, Y.; Lei, W.; Wang, F. Effective adsorption of heavy metal ions by sodium lignosulfonate reformed montmorillonite. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 138, 188–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gu, X.; Evans, L.J.; Barabash, S.J. Modeling the adsorption of Cd (II), Cu (II), Ni (II), Pb (II) and Zn (II) onto montmorillonite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2010, 74, 5718–5728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mwandira, W.; Nakashima, K.; Kawasaki, S. Bioremediation of lead-contaminated mine waste by Pararhodobacter sp. based on the microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation technique and its effects on strength of coarse and fine grained sand. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 109, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Variation of liquid phase pH (a), rate of pH (b), and variation of liquid phase pH (c) for carbonate mineralizing bacteria without Pb2+ in early studies.
Figure 1. Variation of liquid phase pH (a), rate of pH (b), and variation of liquid phase pH (c) for carbonate mineralizing bacteria without Pb2+ in early studies.
Minerals 13 00763 g001
Figure 2. Variation of liquid phase CO32− concentration.
Figure 2. Variation of liquid phase CO32− concentration.
Minerals 13 00763 g002
Figure 3. Variation of Pb2+ concentration (a), rate of change of Pb2+ concentration (b), and the trends in Pb2+ removal rate (c) under the action of carbonate mineralizing bacteria in early studies.
Figure 3. Variation of Pb2+ concentration (a), rate of change of Pb2+ concentration (b), and the trends in Pb2+ removal rate (c) under the action of carbonate mineralizing bacteria in early studies.
Minerals 13 00763 g003
Figure 4. Variation in Pb2+ fugitive content in the montmorillonite-carbonate mineralizing bacteria system.
Figure 4. Variation in Pb2+ fugitive content in the montmorillonite-carbonate mineralizing bacteria system.
Minerals 13 00763 g004
Figure 5. SEM profiles of sedimentary minerals. (a) SEM profile of sedimentary minerals from the control group; (b,c) SEM profiles of sediments from the montmorillonite-carbonate mineralizing bacteria system; (d) SEM profile of products from earlier studies of the interaction of carbonate mineralizing bacteria with Pb2+.
Figure 5. SEM profiles of sedimentary minerals. (a) SEM profile of sedimentary minerals from the control group; (b,c) SEM profiles of sediments from the montmorillonite-carbonate mineralizing bacteria system; (d) SEM profile of products from earlier studies of the interaction of carbonate mineralizing bacteria with Pb2+.
Minerals 13 00763 g005
Figure 6. FTIR (a) and XRD (b) profiles of sedimentary minerals.
Figure 6. FTIR (a) and XRD (b) profiles of sedimentary minerals.
Minerals 13 00763 g006
Figure 7. Mechanism of Pb2+ removal by montmorillonite-carbonate mineralizing bacteria system.
Figure 7. Mechanism of Pb2+ removal by montmorillonite-carbonate mineralizing bacteria system.
Minerals 13 00763 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dai, Q.; Wang, W.; Xu, F.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, L.; Wang, L.; Jiang, R. Study on the Combined Behaviour of Montmorillonite and Carbonate Mineralizing Bacteria on Lead Retention and Fixation. Minerals 2023, 13, 763. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13060763

AMA Style

Dai Q, Wang W, Xu F, Zhao Y, Zhou L, Wang L, Jiang R. Study on the Combined Behaviour of Montmorillonite and Carbonate Mineralizing Bacteria on Lead Retention and Fixation. Minerals. 2023; 13(6):763. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13060763

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dai, Qunwei, Weifu Wang, Fengqin Xu, Yulian Zhao, Lei Zhou, Lihui Wang, and Ruiyang Jiang. 2023. "Study on the Combined Behaviour of Montmorillonite and Carbonate Mineralizing Bacteria on Lead Retention and Fixation" Minerals 13, no. 6: 763. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13060763

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop