Next Article in Journal
Linear Recurrent Double Sequences with Constant Border in M2(F2) are Classified According to Their Geometric Content
Next Article in Special Issue
Action Duality: A Constructive Principle for Quantum Foundations
Previous Article in Journal
Polyominoes and Polyiamonds as Fundamental Domains for Isohedral Tilings of Crystal Class D2
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quantum Theory and Probability Theory: Their Relationship and Origin in Symmetry

Is the Notion of Time Really Fundamental?

School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
SISSA and INFN sezione di Trieste, Trieste 34014, Italy
Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics, Albert Einstein Institute, Am Mühlenberg 1, Golm 14467, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2011, 3(3), 389-401;
Received: 11 June 2011 / Accepted: 21 June 2011 / Published: 29 June 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quantum Symmetry)
From the physics point of view, time is now best described through General Relativity as part of space-time, which is a dynamical object encoding gravity. Time possesses also some intrinsic irreversibility due to thermodynamics and quantum mechanical effects. This irreversibility can look puzzling since time-like loops (and hence time machines) can appear in General Relativity (for example in the Gödel universe, a solution of Einstein’s equations). We take this apparent discrepancy as a warning bell, pointing out that time as we understand it might not be fundamental and that whatever theory lying beyond General Relativity may not include time as we know it as a fundamental structure. We propose therefore, following the philosophy of analog models of gravity, that time and gravity might not be fundamental per se, but only emergent features. We illustrate our proposal using a toy-model where we show how the Lorentzian signature and Nordström gravity (a diffeomorphisms invariant scalar gravity theory) can emerge from a timeless non-dynamical space. This article received the fourth prize at the essay competition of the Foundational Questions Institute on the nature of time. View Full-Text
Keywords: emergent gravity; scalar gravity; signature change emergent gravity; scalar gravity; signature change
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Girelli, F.; Liberati, S.; Sindoni, L. Is the Notion of Time Really Fundamental? Symmetry 2011, 3, 389-401.

AMA Style

Girelli F, Liberati S, Sindoni L. Is the Notion of Time Really Fundamental? Symmetry. 2011; 3(3):389-401.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Girelli, Florian, Stefano Liberati, and Lorenzo Sindoni. 2011. "Is the Notion of Time Really Fundamental?" Symmetry 3, no. 3: 389-401.

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop