Next Article in Journal
A BSMOTE-OOA-SuperLearner Hybrid Framework for Interpretable Prediction of Pillar Stability
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating Large Language Models on Chinese Zero Anaphora: A Symmetric Winograd-Style Minimal-Pair Benchmark
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

The Geometry of Modal Closure—Symmetry, Invariants, and Transform Boundaries

Viterbi School of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA
Symmetry 2026, 18(1), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18010048 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 23 October 2025 / Revised: 21 November 2025 / Accepted: 22 December 2025 / Published: 26 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Mathematics)

Abstract

Modal decomposition, introduced by Fourier, expresses complex functions, such as sums of symmetric basis modes. However, convergence alone does not ensure structural fidelity. Discontinuities, sharp gradients, and localized features often lie outside the chosen basis’s symmetry class, producing artifacts such as the Gibbs overshoot. This study introduces a unified geometric framework for assessing when modal representations remain faithful by defining three symbolic invariants—curvature (κ), strain (τ), and compressibility (σ)—and their diagnostic ratio Γ = κ/τ. Together, these quantities measure how closely the geometry of a function aligns with the symmetry of its modal basis. The condition Γ < σ identifies the domain of structural closure: this is the region in which expansion preserves both accuracy and symmetry. Analytical demonstrations for Fourier, polynomial, and wavelet systems show that overshoot and ringing arise precisely where this inequality fails. Numerical illustrations confirm the predictive value of the invariants across discontinuous and continuous test functions. The framework reframes modal analysis as a problem of geometric compatibility rather than convergence alone, establishing quantitative criteria for closure-preserving transforms in mathematics, physics, and applied computation. It provides a general diagnostic for detecting when symmetry, curvature, and representation fall out of alignment, offering a new foundation for adaptive and structure-aware transform design. In practical terms, the invariants (κ, τ, σ) offer a diagnostic for identifying where modal systems preserve geometric structure and where they fail. Their link to symmetry arises because curvature measures structural deviation, strain measures representational effort within a given symmetry class, and compressibility quantifies efficiency. This geometric viewpoint complements classical convergence theory and clarifies why adaptive spectral methods, edge-aware transforms, multiscale PDE solvers, and learned operators benefit from locally increasing strain to restore the closure condition Γ < σ. These applications highlight the broader analytical and computational relevance of the closure framework.
Keywords: modal closure; symbolic invariants; Gibbs phenomenon; Fourier analysis; structural geometry; wavelet and polynomial bases; symmetry breaking; function representation modal closure; symbolic invariants; Gibbs phenomenon; Fourier analysis; structural geometry; wavelet and polynomial bases; symmetry breaking; function representation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Castro, R. The Geometry of Modal Closure—Symmetry, Invariants, and Transform Boundaries. Symmetry 2026, 18, 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18010048

AMA Style

Castro R. The Geometry of Modal Closure—Symmetry, Invariants, and Transform Boundaries. Symmetry. 2026; 18(1):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18010048

Chicago/Turabian Style

Castro, Robert. 2026. "The Geometry of Modal Closure—Symmetry, Invariants, and Transform Boundaries" Symmetry 18, no. 1: 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18010048

APA Style

Castro, R. (2026). The Geometry of Modal Closure—Symmetry, Invariants, and Transform Boundaries. Symmetry, 18(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18010048

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop