This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
The Geometry of Modal Closure—Symmetry, Invariants, and Transform Boundaries
by
Robert Castro
Robert Castro
Viterbi School of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA
Symmetry 2026, 18(1), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18010048 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 23 October 2025
/
Revised: 21 November 2025
/
Accepted: 22 December 2025
/
Published: 26 December 2025
Abstract
Modal decomposition, introduced by Fourier, expresses complex functions, such as sums of symmetric basis modes. However, convergence alone does not ensure structural fidelity. Discontinuities, sharp gradients, and localized features often lie outside the chosen basis’s symmetry class, producing artifacts such as the Gibbs overshoot. This study introduces a unified geometric framework for assessing when modal representations remain faithful by defining three symbolic invariants—curvature (κ), strain (τ), and compressibility (σ)—and their diagnostic ratio Γ = κ/τ. Together, these quantities measure how closely the geometry of a function aligns with the symmetry of its modal basis. The condition Γ < σ identifies the domain of structural closure: this is the region in which expansion preserves both accuracy and symmetry. Analytical demonstrations for Fourier, polynomial, and wavelet systems show that overshoot and ringing arise precisely where this inequality fails. Numerical illustrations confirm the predictive value of the invariants across discontinuous and continuous test functions. The framework reframes modal analysis as a problem of geometric compatibility rather than convergence alone, establishing quantitative criteria for closure-preserving transforms in mathematics, physics, and applied computation. It provides a general diagnostic for detecting when symmetry, curvature, and representation fall out of alignment, offering a new foundation for adaptive and structure-aware transform design. In practical terms, the invariants (κ, τ, σ) offer a diagnostic for identifying where modal systems preserve geometric structure and where they fail. Their link to symmetry arises because curvature measures structural deviation, strain measures representational effort within a given symmetry class, and compressibility quantifies efficiency. This geometric viewpoint complements classical convergence theory and clarifies why adaptive spectral methods, edge-aware transforms, multiscale PDE solvers, and learned operators benefit from locally increasing strain to restore the closure condition Γ < σ. These applications highlight the broader analytical and computational relevance of the closure framework.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Castro, R.
The Geometry of Modal Closure—Symmetry, Invariants, and Transform Boundaries. Symmetry 2026, 18, 48.
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18010048
AMA Style
Castro R.
The Geometry of Modal Closure—Symmetry, Invariants, and Transform Boundaries. Symmetry. 2026; 18(1):48.
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18010048
Chicago/Turabian Style
Castro, Robert.
2026. "The Geometry of Modal Closure—Symmetry, Invariants, and Transform Boundaries" Symmetry 18, no. 1: 48.
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18010048
APA Style
Castro, R.
(2026). The Geometry of Modal Closure—Symmetry, Invariants, and Transform Boundaries. Symmetry, 18(1), 48.
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18010048
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.