Next Article in Journal
Addressing Structural Asymmetry: Unsupervised Joint Training of Bilingual Embeddings for Non-Isomorphic Spaces
Previous Article in Journal
Revisiting the Poincaré and Little Groups with Physical Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Results on Differential Subordination and Superordination for Multivalent Functions Involving New Symmetric Operator
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A New Form of Convolution Theorem for One-Dimensional Quaternion Linear Canonical Transform and Application

by
Mawardi Bahri
1,*,
Samsul Ariffin Abdul Karim
2,
Bannu Addul S.
3,
Muhammad Nur
1 and
Nurwahidah Nurwahidah
1,4
1
Department of Mathematics, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia
2
Institute of Strategic Industrial Decision Modelling (ISIDM), School of Quantitative Sciences, UUM College of Arts & Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010, Malaysia
3
Department of Physics, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia
4
Department of Mathematics, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Gowa 92113, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2025, 17(7), 1004; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17071004
Submission received: 29 April 2025 / Revised: 14 June 2025 / Accepted: 18 June 2025 / Published: 26 June 2025

Abstract

In this research work, we focus on the one-dimensional quaternion linear canonical transform (1-D QLCT). Under certain conditions, we first derive the symmetry property of the 1-D QLCT for real signals. The new form of the convolution theorem related to this transformation is proposed. We develop this convolution definition to derive the correlation theorem for the 1-D QLCT. We then show that the direct connection between the quaternion convolution and quaternion correlation definitions permits us to provide a different way for proving the correlation theorem concerning the 1-D QLCT. Finally, we present a simple application of the convolution theorem to the study of quaternion swept-frequency filter analysis.

1. Introduction

Due to the importance of the linear canonical transform [1,2], a series of studies have been conducted on the generalization of the classical linear canonical transform using the quaternion algebra, called the quaternion linear canonical transform (QLCT). Recently, the two-dimensional quaternion linear canonical transform (2-D QLCT) was studied theoretically and proved to be a useful tool in several areas, like signal processing, optics, quantum physics, and statistics [3,4,5,6]. It is an expansion of popular generalized transformations like the two-dimensional quaternion Fourier quaternion [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14] and the two-dimensional quaternion fractional Fourier transform [15,16,17]. More recently, the authors of [18,19,20] proposed the offset quaternion linear canonical transform, which is the expansion of the 2-D QLCT. With the rigorous research of the 2-D QLCT, a number of useful properties of the 2-D QLCT have been investigated, including shifting, modulation, correlation, differentiation, energy conservation, inequalities, and so on. In this research paper, our work is focused on the one-dimensional quaternion linear canonical transform (1-D QLCT), which was recently studied by the authors in [21]. As we know, the authors of [21] discussed a convolution definition of the 1-D QLCT and obtained the convolution theorem, which is the multiplication of their 1-D QLCT and a phase factor. The form of this convolution theorem contains an extra chirp factor and is not exactly parallel to the convolution theorem for the one-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform [22].
Therefore, we first propose a new form of the convolution definition related to the 1-D QLCT, which is quite different from the one proposed in [21]. The convolution theorem is found to be equal to a simple multiplication of the 1-D QLCT and the quaternion Fourier transform. In addition, based on the convolution definition, we propose a correlation definition for the 1-D QLCT. We then provide direct proof of the correlation theorem. By leveraging the basic connection between the convolution definition and correlation definition, we provide further proof of the correlation theorem related to this transformation. We finally provide a simple application of the convolution theorem to quaternion swept-frequency filter analysis.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we focus on the basic properties of quaternion algebra used in the next section. In Section 3, we recall the definition of the one-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform and collect its useful properties, such as the convolution and correlation theorems. In Section 4, we provide the definition of the 1-D QLCT and propose a new form of its convolution theorem. The derivation of the correlation theorem related to this transformation is also provided in this section. For the illustration of the proposed transformation, we provide in Section 5 a simple application of the convolution theorem concerning the 1-D QLCT. Finally, in Section 6, we provide a simple conclusion.

2. Preliminaries

This part collects a few well-known facts about quaternions, which will be important for the rest of paper. Real quaternion is a generalization of the complex numbers over real number R and is denoted by H . Every element of H may be expressed as [23]
H = { r = r 0 + i r 1 + j r 2 + k r 3 : r 0 , r 1 , r 2 , r 3 R } ,
which follows the following multiplication laws:
ij = ji = k , jk = kj = i , ki = ik = j , i 2 = j 2 = k 2 = ijk = 1 .
For a quaternion r = r 0 + i r 1 + j r 2 + k r 3 , r 0 = S ( r ) is called scalar part and V ( r ) = r = i r 1 + j r 2 + k r 3 is called the vector part or the pure quaternion. This will lead to
r = S ( r ) + V ( r ) .
According to relation (2), we get the quaternion product r z in the form
r z = S ( r ) S ( z ) V ( r ) · V ( z ) + S ( z ) V ( r ) + S ( r ) V ( z ) + V ( r ) × V ( z ) ,
for which
V ( r ) · V ( z ) = r 1 z 1 + r 2 z 2 + r 3 z 3 V ( r ) × V ( z ) = i ( r 2 z 3 r 3 z 2 ) + j ( r 3 z 1 r 1 z 3 ) + k ( r 1 z 2 r 2 z 3 ) .
We introduce to each quaternion r its conjugate one; that is,
r ¯ = r 0 i r 1 j r 2 k r 3 ,
with the property
r z ¯ = z ¯ r ¯ , r ¯ ¯ = r .
Note that, in contrast to complex conjugate, the conjugate quaternion changes the order of multiplication. From (6), we can get the norm or modulus of r H as
| r | = r r ¯ = r 0 2 + r 1 2 + r 2 2 + r 3 2 .
It is routine to verify that
| r z | = | r | | z | , | r + z | | r | + | z | , | r 2 | = | r | 2 ,
and
r + r ¯ 2 = S ( r ) , r r ¯ 2 = V ( r ) , S ( r ) | r | , V ( r ) | r | , r , z H .
The following aspects are satisfied via
S ( r z ) = S ( z r ) , S ( r ¯ z ) = S ( r z ¯ ) ,
but
S ( r ¯ z ) S ( r z ) , r , z H .
Based on quaternion conjugate (6) and the modulus of r, we define the inverse of a non-zero quaternion r H as
r 1 = r ¯ | r | 2 .
Utilizing (13) above, one can get
| p r | = | p | | r | , p H .
Like the complex case, we may introduce the inner product for two continuous functions f , g : R H as
( f , g ) L 2 ( R ; H ) = f ( x ) g ( x ) ¯ d x .
Especially, we get
f L 2 ( R ; H ) = | f ( x ) | 2 d x 1 2 .
Using the basic properties of quaternion explained above, we can derive the following result.
Theorem 1. 
For any function f L 2 ( R ; H ) , the following inequality is satisfied
| f ( x ) d x | 2 | f ( x ) | d x .
Proof. 
In view of Equation (8), we have
| f ( x ) d x | 2 = ( f 0 ( x ) + i f 1 ( x ) + j f 2 ( x ) + k f 3 ( x ) ) d x 2 = f 0 ( x ) d x + i f 1 ( x ) d x + j f 2 ( x ) d x + k f 3 ( x ) d x 2 = f 0 ( x ) d x + i f 1 ( x ) d x + j f 2 ( x ) d x + k f 3 ( x ) d x × f 0 ( x ) d x i f 1 ( x ) d x j f 2 ( x ) d x k f 3 ( x ) d x = f 0 ( x ) d x 2 + f 1 ( x ) d x 2 + f 2 ( x ) d x 2 + f 3 ( x ) d x 2 .
By using (10), relation (18) above changes to
| f ( x ) d x | 2 | f ( x ) | d x 2 + | f ( x ) | d x 2 + | f ( x ) | d x 2 + | f ( x ) | d x 2 = 4 | f ( x ) | d x 2 .
Hence,
f ( x ) d x 2 | f ( x ) | d x ,
and proof is complete. □
Remark 1. 
If a complex function f L 2 ( R ) , Equation (17) will lead to
| f ( x ) d x | 2 | f ( x ) | d x .

3. The 1-D QLCT with Properties

In this part, we briefly review the definition of the one-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform (1-D QFT) and main properties. More details have been presented in [22].
Definition 1. 
The definition of the one-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform (1-D QFT) for the quaternion signal f L 2 ( R ; H ) is given by
F i { f } ( ω ) = f ( x ) e i ω x d x ,
where x , ω R .
It is observed that, if the quaternion function f ( x ) is decomposed into
f ( x ) = f 0 ( x ) + i f 1 ( x ) + j f 2 ( x ) + k f 3 ,
we get
F i { f } ( ω ) = R 0 ( ω ) + i R 1 ( ω ) + j R 2 ( ω ) + k R 3 ( ω ) ,
where
R 0 ( ω ) = f 0 ( x ) cos ω x + f 1 ( x ) sin ω x d x R 1 ( ω ) = f 1 ( x ) cos ω x f 0 ( x ) sin ω x d x R 2 ( ω ) = f 2 ( x ) cos ω x f 3 ( x ) sin ω x d x R 3 ( ω ) = f 3 ( x ) cos ω x + f 2 ( x ) sin ω x d x .
If f ( x ) in (21) is a real-valued function, then relation (23) changes to
F i { f } ( ω ) = R 0 ( ω ) + i R 1 ( ω ) ,
for which
R 0 ( ω ) = f ( x ) cos ω x d x , and R 1 ( ω ) = f ( x ) sin ω x d x .
Now Equation (21) can be rewritten as
F i { f } ( ω ) = f ( x ) ¯ ¯ e i ω x ¯ d x .
In view of Equation (7), we obtain
F i { f } ( ω ) = e i ω x f ( x ) ¯ ¯ d x .
Definition 2. 
If f L 1 ( R ; H ) with F i { f } L 1 ( R ; H ) , then the inverse transform of the 1-D QFT is computed by
f ( x ) = 1 2 π F i { f } ( ω ) e i ω x d ω .
Let us introduce the quaternion convolution for two quaternion functions f , g L 2 ( R ; H ) through the following definition:
( f g ) ( x ) = f ( y ) g ( x y ) d y .
The next result provides the convolution theorem that describes how the 1-D QFT interacts with the quaternion convolution.
Theorem 2. 
Suppose f L 2 ( R ; H ) and g L 2 ( R ; H ) . Then, the following holds
F i { f g } ( ω ) = F i { g } ( ω ) F i { f 0 } ( ω ) + i F i { g } ( ω ) F i { f 1 } ( ω ) + j F i { g } ( ω ) F i { f 2 } ( ω ) + k F i { g } ( ω ) F i { f 3 } ( ω ) .
Moreover,
( f g ) ( x ) = F μ 1 [ F i { g } ( ω ) F i { f 0 } ( ω ) + i F i { g } ( ω ) F i { f 1 } ( ω ) + j F i { g } ( ω ) F i { f 2 } ( ω ) + k F i { g } ( ω ) F i { f 3 } ( ω ) ] ( x ) .
Definition 3. 
The correlation definition for the 1-D QFT of two quaternion functions f , g L 1 ( R ; H ) is given by the integral
( f g ) ( x ) = f ( y ) ¯ g ( x + y ) d y .
With the above definition, one gets (see [22])
Theorem 3. 
Suppose that f , g belong to L 2 ( R ; H ) ; we have
F i { f g } ( ω ) = F i { g } ( ω ) F i { f 0 } ( ω ) i F i { g } ( ω ) F i { f 1 } ( ω ) j F i { g } ( ω ) F i { f 2 } ( ω ) k F i { g } ( ω ) F i { f 3 } ( ω ) .

4. Convolution and Correlation Theorems for the I-D QLCT

Based on the quaternion algebra, we introduce the 1-D QLCT in this part. It will be shown that the convolution theorem for the 1-D QLCT is a general form of the convolution theorem for the 1-D QFT. Let us now introduce the definition of the 1-D QLCT.
Definition 4. 
Let A = a b c d R 2 be a matrix parameter satisfying det ( A ) = 1 . The 1-D QLCT of the function f L 2 ( R ; H ) is defined by
L A { f } ( ω ) = f ( x ) K A i ( x , ω ) d x ,
and kernel K A i ( x , ω ) is given by
K A i ( x , ω ) = 1 2 π | b | e i ( a 2 b x 2 x ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) , b 0 d e i c d 2 ω 2 δ ( x d ω ) , b = 0 .
It should be clear that, for b = 0 , the 1-D QLCT definition reduces to chirp multiplication operator and is of no particular interest for the objective in this research. Therefore, we always consider the case of b 0 in the work unless stated otherwise.
Now observe that
L A { f } ( ω ) = f ( x ) K A i ( x , ω ) d x = 1 2 π | b | f ( x ) e i ( a 2 b x 2 x ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) d x = 1 2 π | b | f 0 ( x ) + i f 1 ( x ) + j f 2 ( x ) + k f 3 ( x ) e i ( a 2 b x 2 x ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) d x = L A { f 0 } ( ω ) + i L A { f 1 } ( ω ) + j L A { f 2 } ( ω ) + k L A { f 3 } ( ω ) .
This equation implies that
L A { f } ( ω ) ¯ = K A i ( x , ω ) ¯ f ( x ) ¯ d x = 1 2 π | b | e i ( a 2 b x 2 + x ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) f ( x ) ¯ d x = 1 2 π | b | e i ( a 2 b x 2 x ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) f 0 ( x ) i f 1 ( x ) j f 2 ( x ) k f 3 ( x ) d x .
In particular, when the function f ( x ) is real-valued and the matrix parameter A = a b c d , relation (38) changes to
L A { f } ( ω ) ¯ = L A { f } ( ω ) .
Relation (38) is often called the symmetry property of the 1-D QLCT.
Again, from (37) above, it is straightforward to verify that
| L A { f i } ( ω ) | | L A { f } ( ω ) | , i = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 .
In this case, we may define
| L A { f } ( ω ) | = | L A f 0 ( ω ) | 2 + | L A f 1 ( ω ) | 2 + | L A f 2 ( ω ) | 2 + | L A f 3 ( ω ) | 2 .
Definition 5. 
If f L 1 ( R ; H ) with L A { f } L 1 ( R ; H ) , then the inverse transform of the 1-D QLCT is calculated via
f ( x ) = L A { f } ( ω ) K A i ( x , ω ) ¯ d ω = 1 2 π | b | L A { f } ( ω ) e i ( a 2 b x 2 x ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) d ω .
Now we present Parseval’s formula for the 1-D QLCT, which is stated as follows.
Theorem 4 
([22]). For any functions f , g belonging to L 1 ( R ; H ) L 2 ( R ; H ) , the following identity holds:
( f , g ) L 2 ( R ; H ) = ( L A { f } , L A { g } ) L 2 ( R ; H ) ,
and
f L 2 ( R ; H ) = L A { f } L 2 ( R ; H ) .
From relations (21) and (35), it follows that
L A { f } ( ω ) = f ( x ) K A i ( x , ω ) d x = 1 2 π | b | e i ( a 2 b x 2 x ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) f ( x ) d x = e i π 4 2 π | b | e i d 2 b ω 2 e i x ω b e i a 2 b x 2 f ( x ) d x = e i π 4 2 π | b | e i d 2 b ω 2 F i { h } ( ω b ) d x ,
where
h ( x ) = e i a 2 b x 2 f ( x ) .
Equation (45) provides the direct relationship between the 1-D QFT and 1-D QLCT. This relation is very useful to derive some properties of the 1-D QLCT.
Remark 2. 
It should be observed that, when A = 0 1 1 0 , then, from Equation (45), we get
L A { f } ( ω ) = e i π 4 2 π F i { f } ( ω ) .
Let us now introduce the definition of the quaternion convolution in the 1-D QLCT domain. It is an important technical tool in the area of image processing. The quaternion convolution for the 1-D QLCT plays a crucial role in the sequel.
Definition 6. 
The convolution operation of the 1-D QLCT for signals f , g L 2 ( R ; H ) is given by
( f g ) ( x ) = f ( y ) g ( x y ) e i a 2 b ( x y ) 2 d y e i ( a 2 b x 2 ) .
It is easy to check that, for A = 0 1 1 0 , Equation (48) becomes the quaternion convolution definition (30). With the above definition, we obtain the following important convolution theorem.
Theorem 5. 
Suppose that f , g L 2 ( R ; H ) ; then, the 1-D QLCT of the convolution of f and g is described by
L A { f g } ( ω ) = L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 0 } ω b + i L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 1 } ω b + j L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 2 } ω b + k L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 3 } ω b .
In addition,
L A { f ¯ g } ( ω ) = L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 0 } ω b i L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 1 } ω b j L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 2 } ω b k L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 3 } ω b .
Proof. 
According to the definition of the 1-D QLCT (35), we can obtain
L A { f g } ( ω ) = ( f g ) ( x ) K A i ( x , ω ) d x = f ( y ) g ( x y ) e i a b ( x y ) 2 d y e i ( a 2 b x 2 ) K A i ( x , ω ) d x = f ( y ) g ( x y ) e i a b ( x y ) 2 d y e i ( a 2 b x 2 ) 1 2 π | b | e i ( a 2 b x 2 x ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) d x d y = 1 2 π | b | f ( y ) g ( x y ) e i a b ( x y ) 2 e i ( a 2 b x 2 ) e i ( a 2 b x 2 x ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) d x d y = 1 2 π | b | f ( y ) g ( x y ) e i a b ( x y ) 2 e i ( x ω b d 2 b ω 2 + π 4 ) d y d x .
Using the change of the variables z = x y , we obtain
L A { f g } ( ω ) = 1 2 π | b | f ( y ) g ( z ) e i a b z 2 e i ( ( z + y ) ω b d 2 b ω 2 + π 4 ) d y d z = 1 2 π | b | f ( y ) g ( z ) e i y ω b e i ( a b z 2 z ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) d y d z .
The decomposition of f ( y ) = f 0 ( y ) + i f 1 ( y ) + j f 2 ( y ) + k f 3 ( y ) will lead to
L A { f g } ( ω ) = 1 2 π | b | g ( z ) e i ( a b z 2 z ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) f 0 ( y ) e i y ω b d y d z + i 1 2 π | b | g ( z ) e i ( a b z 2 z ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) f 1 ( y ) e i y ω b d y d z + j 1 2 π | b | g ( z ) e i ( a b z 2 z ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) f 2 ( y ) e i y ω b d y d z + k 1 2 π | b | g ( z ) e i ( a b z 2 z ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) f 3 ( y ) e i y ω b d y d z .
The proof is complete. □
The alternative form of the convolution theorem for the 1-D QLCT was discussed in [21]. Their convolution theorem is the product of the 1-D QLCT and phase factor, which is not similar to the convolution theorem for the 1-D QFT in Theorem 2.
Let us now collect some findings regarding Theorem 5 in the following remark.
Remark 3. 
  • If f and g are real-valued functions, Equation (49) becomes
    L A { f g } ( ω ) = L A { f } ( ω ) F i { g } ω b ,
    which corresponds to the convolution theorem for the classical linear canonical transform (compare to [24]).
  • Generalization of convolution theorem for the 1-D QLCT to the 2-D QLCT may be considered in future work (compare to [25,26])
Further, we obtain the inequality related the convolution theorem in the form
| L A { f g } ( ω ) | 2 | L A { g } ( ω ) | 2 | F i { f 0 } ω b | 2 + | F i { f 1 } ω b | 2 + | F i { f 2 } ω b | 2 + | F i { f 3 } ω b | 2 .
To see this, we observe that
| L A { f g } ( ω ) | 2 = | L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 0 } ω b + i L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 1 } ω b + j L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 2 } ω b + k L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 3 } ω b | 2 .
The triangle inequality for quaternion yields
| L A { f g } ( ω ) | 2 | L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 0 } ω b | 2 + | i L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 1 } ω b | 2 + | j L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 2 } ω b | 2 + | k L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 3 } ω b | 2 = | L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 0 } ω b | 2 + | L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 1 } ω b | 2 + | L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 2 } ω b | 2 + | L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 3 } ω b | 2 = | L A { g } ( ω ) | 2 ( | F i { f 0 } ω b | 2 + | F i { f 1 } ω b | 2 + | F i { f 2 } ω b | 2 + | F i { f 3 } ω b | 2 ) .
Remark 4. 
It should be observed that, when A = 0 1 1 0 , Equation (49) changes to the convolution theorem for the 1-D QFT (31).
Below, we define the quaternion correlation concerning the 1-D QLCT.
Definition 7. 
The correlation related to the 1-D QLCT of two quaternion functions f , g L 2 ( R ; H ) is expressed as
( f g ) ( x ) = f ( y ) ¯ g ( x + y ) e i a 2 b ( x + y ) 2 d y e i ( a 2 b x 2 ) .
With the above definition, we get the following result on the 1-D QLCT of a correlation of two quaternion functions.
Theorem 6. 
Assume that f , g L 2 ( R ; H ) ; then, the correlation for f and g in terms of the 1-D QLCT is provided by
L A { f g } ( ω ) = L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 0 } ω b i L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 1 } ω b + j L A { g } ( ω ) × F i { f 2 } ω b k L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 3 } ω b ,
where A = a b c d .
Proof. 
We first provide direct proof of the result. By virtue of relations (35) and (55), we see that
L A { f g } ( ω ) = ( f g ) ( x ) K A i ( x , ω ) d x = f ( y ) ¯ g ( x + y ) e i a b ( x + y ) 2 d y e i ( a 2 b x 2 ) K A i ( x , ω ) d x = f ( y ) ¯ g ( x + y ) e i a b ( x + y ) 2 d y e i ( a 2 b x 2 ) 1 2 π | b | e i ( a 2 b x 2 x ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) d x d y = 1 2 π | b | f ( y ) ¯ g ( x + y ) e i a b ( x + y ) 2 d y e i ( a 2 b x 2 ) e i ( a 2 b x 2 x ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) d x d y = 1 2 π | b | f ( y ) ¯ g ( x + y ) e i a b ( x + y ) 2 e i ( x ω b d 2 b ω 2 + π 4 ) d y d x .
By substituting, u = x + y in the above identity, we arrive at
L A { f g } ( ω ) = 1 2 π | b | f ( y ) ¯ g ( u ) e i a b u 2 e i ( ( u y ) ω b d 2 b ω 2 + π 4 ) d y d u = 1 2 π | b | f ( y ) ¯ g ( u ) e i y ω b e i ( a b u 2 u ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) d y d u = 1 2 π | b | f 0 ( y ) i f 1 ( y ) j f 2 ( y ) k f 3 ( y ) g ( u ) e i y ω b e i ( a b u 2 u ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) d y d u
This equation may be rewritten as
L A { f g } ( ω ) = 1 2 π | b | g ( u ) e i ( a b u 2 u ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) f 0 ( y ) e i y ω b d y d u i 1 2 π | b | g ( u ) e i ( a b u 2 u ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) f 1 ( y ) e i y ω b d y d u j 1 2 π | b | g ( u ) e i ( a b u 2 u ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) f 2 ( y ) e i y ω b d y d u k 1 2 π | b | g ( u ) e i ( a b u 2 u ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) f 3 ( y ) e i y ω b d y d u .
Thus, the proof is complete. □
Let us provide further proof of correlation theorem for the 1-D QLCT using the interaction between the definition of convolution and the definition of correlation.
Alternative Proof of Theorem 6. 
Putting y = z and setting f ( z ) = h ( z ) in relation (55) yields
( f g ) ( x ) = f ( z ) ¯ g ( x z ) e i a 2 b ( x z ) 2 d z e i ( a 2 b x 2 ) = h ( z ) ¯ g ( x z ) e i a 2 b ( x z ) 2 d z e i ( a 2 b x 2 ) = ( h ¯ g ) ( x ) .
Applying (50) yields
( f g ) ( x ) = L A 1 [ L A { g } ( ω ) F i { h 0 } ( ω b ) i L A { g } ( ω ) F i { h 1 } ( ω b ) j L A { g } ( ω ) F i { h 2 } ( ω b ) k L A { g } ( ω ) F i { h 3 } ( ω b ) ] ( x ) .
Now we observe that
F i h 0 ( ω ) = f 0 ( z ) e i ω z b d z = f 0 ( z ) e i ω z b d z = F i { f 0 } ( ω b ) .
Similarly, we get
F i h i ( ω ) = F i { f i } ( ω b ) , i = 1 , 2 , 3 .
Substituting Equations (59) and (60) into Equation (58) results in
L A { f g } ( ω ) = L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 0 } ω b i L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 1 } ω b j L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 2 } ω b k L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 3 } ω b ,
and the proof is complete. □

5. Application of Convolution Theorem

As a simple application of the quaternion convolution theorem (48) above, we get the following result, which is the main result of this section.
Theorem 7. 
Consider a system g ( x ) such that its response satisfies
h ( x 0 ) = f ( x ) g ( x 0 x ) e i a 2 b ( x 0 x ) 2 d x e i a 2 b x 0 2 ,
for each fixed x 0 . If the energy of the system g ( x ) is specified, that is,
E = | g ( x ) | 2 d x ,
then, for every input signal f ( x ) , the following is satisfied:
| h ( x 0 ) | 2 E 2 π | b | [ | F i { f 0 } ω b | 2 d ω + | F i { f 1 } ω b | 2 d ω + | F i { f 2 } ω b | 2 d ω + | F i { f 3 } ω b | 2 d ω ] .
Proof. 
From Equations (29) and (71), it can be deduced that
h ( x 0 ) = 1 2 π | b | ( L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 0 } ω b + i L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 1 } ω b + j L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 2 } ω b + k L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 3 } ω b ) e i ( a 2 b x 0 2 x 0 ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) d ω .
We further get
| h ( x 0 ) | 2 = | 1 2 π | b | ( L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 0 } ω b + i L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 1 } ω b + j L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 2 } ω b + k L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 3 } ω b ) e i ( a 2 b x 0 2 x 0 ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) d ω | 2 1 2 π | b | | L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 0 } ω b + i L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 1 } ω b + j L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 2 } ω b + k L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 3 } ω b | 2 d ω = 1 2 π | b | [ | L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 0 } ω b | 2 d ω + | i L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 1 } ω b | 2 d ω + | j L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 2 } ω b | 2 d ω + | k L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 3 } ω b | 2 d ω ] .
With the help of Cauchy–Schwartz inequality and Parseval’s Formula (44), we see that
| h ( x 0 ) | 2 1 2 π | b | [ | L A { g } ( ω ) | 2 d ω | F i { f 0 } ω b | 2 d ω + | L A { g } ( ω ) | 2 d ω | F i { f 1 } ω b | 2 d ω + | L A { g } ( ω ) | 2 d ω | F i { f 2 } ω b | 2 d ω + | L A { g } ( ω ) | 2 d ω | F i { f 3 } ω b | 2 d ω ] .
This relation is simplified to
| h ( x 0 ) | 2 1 2 π | b | | L A { g } ( ω ) | 2 d ω [ | F i { f 0 } ω b | 2 d ω + | F i { f 1 } ω b | 2 d ω + | F i { f 2 } ω b | 2 d ω + | F i { f 3 } ω b | 2 d ω ] = E 2 π | b | [ | F i { f 0 } ω b | 2 d ω + | F i { f 1 } ω b | 2 d ω + | F i { f 2 } ω b | 2 d ω + | F i { f 3 } ω b | 2 d ω ] ,
and the proof is complete. □
Remark 5. 
If f L 2 ( R ) is a real-valued function, relation (64) will lead to
| h ( x 0 ) | 2 E 2 π | b | | F i { f } ( ω b ) | 2 d ω .
To verify the correctness of Theorem 7, we provide a simple example as below.
Example 1. 
Consider the signals of the form
f ( x ) = g ( x ) = e x 2 .
Thus, we obtain
h ( x 0 ) = f ( x ) g ( x 0 x ) e i a 2 b ( x 0 x ) 2 d x e i a 2 b x 0 2 = e x 2 e ( x 0 x ) 2 e i a 2 b ( x 0 x ) 2 d x e i a 2 b x 0 2 = e x 2 e ( x 0 2 2 x 0 x + x 2 ) e i a 2 b ( x 0 2 2 x 0 x + x 2 ) d x e i a 2 b x 0 2 = e x 2 e x 0 2 + 2 x 0 x x 2 e i a 2 b x 0 2 e i a b x 0 x e i a 2 b x 2 d x e i a 2 b x 0 2 .
This equation yields
| h ( x 0 ) | e 2 x 2 + 2 x 0 x x 0 2 d x = π 2 e x 0 2 2 .
On the other side, we have
E = | g ( x ) | 2 d x = e x 2 d x = π ,
and
E 2 π | b | | F i { f } ( ω b ) | 2 d ω = π 2 π | b | π e ω 2 4 b 2 d ω = 1 2 | b | 4 π b 2 = π .
Equations (72) and (74) show that Equation (64) is valid.
Now, setting x y = z in Equation (48), we immediately obtain
r ( x ) = f ( x z ) g ( z ) e i a 2 b z 2 d z e i a 2 b x 2 .
Equation (75) is known as the output of generalized swept-frequency filters. Taking the 1-D QLCT of the above identity, we obtain
L A { r } ( ω ) = f ( x z ) g ( z ) e i a 2 b z 2 d z e i a 2 b x 2 1 2 π | b | e i ( a 2 b x 2 x ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) d x = f ( x z ) g ( z ) e i a 2 b z 2 e i a 2 b x 2 1 2 π | b | e i ( a 2 b x 2 x ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) d x d z .
This equation is simplified to
L A { r } ( ω ) = f ( y ) g ( z ) 1 2 π | b | e i ( a 2 b z 2 ( y + z ) ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) d z d y = f ( y ) g ( z ) 1 2 π | b | e i ( a 2 b z 2 z ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) e i y ω b d z d y = f ( y ) 1 2 π | b | g ( z ) e i ( a 2 b z 2 z ω b + d 2 b ω 2 π 4 ) d z e i y ω b d y = f ( y ) L A { g } ( ω ) e i u ω b d y .
Note that, if L A { g } ( ω ) is a real-valued function, then we immediately obtain
L A { r } ( ω ) = F i { f } ω b L A { g } ( ω ) .
Further, when L A { g } ( ω ) is a quaternion-valued function, then we decompose f ( y ) = f 0 ( y ) + i f 1 ( y ) + j f 2 ( y ) + k f 3 ( y ) and obtain
L A { r } ( ω ) = f ( y ) L A { g } ( ω ) e i y ω b d y = f 0 ( y ) + i f 1 ( y ) + j f 2 ( y ) + k f 3 ( y ) L A { g } ( ω ) e i y ω b d y = L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 0 } ω b + i L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 1 } ω b + j L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 2 } ω b + k L A { g } ( ω ) F i { f 3 } ω b .

6. Conclusions

In this work, we introduced the 1-D QLCT. The convolution theorem related to this transformation was derived in detail. We found that the convolution theorem is equivalent to simple multiplication of the 1-D QLCT and the quaternion Fourier transform. We proposed a simple application of the convolution theorem regarding the study of quaternion swept-frequency filter analysis. In the future, we will concentrate on investigating the convolution and correlation theorems associated with the 2-D QLCT, whose proof is more complicated, and discuss several applications, such as quaternion swept-frequency filter analysis, image denoising, and so on.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B.; formal analysis, M.N.; funding acquisition, S.A.A.K.; investigation, M.B. and M.N.; methodology, B.A.S. and S.A.A.K.; resources, S.A.A.K.; validation, M.B. and B.A.S.; writing—original draft, M.B.; writing—review and editing, M.B., N.N. and B.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which helped the authors to improve this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bracewell, R. The Fourier Transform and Its Applications; McGraw Hill: Boston, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mallat, S. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhu, X.; Zheng, S. On uncertainty principle for the two-sided quaternion linear canonical transform. J. Pseudo-Differ. Oper. Appl. 2021, 12, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Y.N.; Li, B.Z. Novel uncertainty principles for two-sided quaternion linear canonical transform. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebr. 2018, 28, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Urynbassarova, U.; Teali, A.A.; Zhang, F. Discrete quaternion linear canonical transform. Digit. Signal Process. 2022, 122, 103361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bahri, M.; Ahino, R. Logarithmic uncertainty principle for quaternion linear canonical transform. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Wavelet Analysis and Pattern Recognition (ICWAPR), Jeju Island, Republic of Korea, 10–13 July 2016; pp. 140–145. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hitzer, E. The quaternion domain Fourier transform and its properties. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebr. 2016, 26, 969–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hitzer, E. Quaternion Fourier transform on quaternion fields and generalizations. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebr. 2007, 17, 497–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ell, T.A. Quaternion-Fourier transform transform for analysis of 2-dimensional linear time invariant partial-differential system. In Proceeding of the 32nd Conference on Decision and Control, San Antonio, TX, USA, 15–17 December 1993; pp. 1830–1841. [Google Scholar]
  10. El Haoui, Y.; Fahlaoui, S. The uncertainty principle for the two-sided quaternion Fourier transform. Mediterr. J. Math. 2017, 14, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. El Haoui, Y.; Fahlaoui, S. Miyachi’s theorem for the quaternion Fourier transform. Circ. Syst. Sig. Process. 2020, 39, 2193–2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bihan, L.; Sangwine, S.J. Quaternionic spectral analysis of non-stationary improper complex signals. In Quaternion and Clifford Fourier Transforms and Wavelets Trends in Mathematics; Hitzer, E., Sangwine, S.J., Eds.; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 2013; pp. 41–56. [Google Scholar]
  13. Saima, S.; Li, B.Z.; Adnan, S.M. New sampling expansion related to derivatives in quaternion Fourier transform domain. Mathematics 2022, 10, 1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cheng, D.; Kou, K.I. Generalized sampling expansions associated with quaternion Fourier transform. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2016, 41, 4021–4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, G.; Wang, X.; Xu, X. Fractional quaternion Fourier transform, convolution and correlation. Signal Process. 2008, 88, 2511–2517. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, B.; Yu, M.; Tian, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, D.; Sun, X. Multiple-parameter fractional quaternion Fourier transform and its application in colour image encryption. ET Image Process. 2018, 12, 2238–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Samad, M.A.; Xia, Y.; Siddiqui, S.; Bhat, M.Y.; Urynbassarova, D.; Urynbassarova, A. Quaternion fractional Fourier transform: Bridging signal processing and probability theory. Mathematics 2025, 13, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bhat, M.Y.; Dar, A.H. Quaternion offset linear canonical transform in one-dimensional setting. J. Anal. 2023, 31, 2613–2622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Urynbassarova, D.; Teali, A.A. Convolution, correlation, and uncertainty principles for the quaternion offset linear canonical transform. Mathematics 2023, 11, 2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kundu, M. Different types of Plancherel’s theorems for square integrable functions associated with quaternion offset linear canonical. J. Franklin Inst. 2025, 362, 107649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Saima, S.; Li, B.Z. Quaternionic one-dimensional linear canonical transform. Optik 2021, 244, 166914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bahri, M.; Toaha, S.; Rahim, A.; Azis, M.I. On one-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1341, 062004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bülow, T. Hypercomplex Spectral Signal Representations for the Processing and Analysis of Images. Ph.D. Thesis, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, Z.C. New convolution and product theorem for the linear canonical transform and its application. Optik 2016, 127, 4894–4902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, Z.W.; Gao, W.B.; Li, B.Z. A new kind of convolution, correlation and product theorems related to quaternion linear canonical transform. SIViP 2021, 15, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hu, X.; Cheng, D.; Kou, K.I. Convolution theorems associated with quaternion linear canonical transform and applications. Signal Process. 2023, 202, 108743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bahri, M.; Karim, S.A.A.; S., B.A.; Nur, M.; Nurwahidah, N. A New Form of Convolution Theorem for One-Dimensional Quaternion Linear Canonical Transform and Application. Symmetry 2025, 17, 1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17071004

AMA Style

Bahri M, Karim SAA, S. BA, Nur M, Nurwahidah N. A New Form of Convolution Theorem for One-Dimensional Quaternion Linear Canonical Transform and Application. Symmetry. 2025; 17(7):1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17071004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bahri, Mawardi, Samsul Ariffin Abdul Karim, Bannu Addul S., Muhammad Nur, and Nurwahidah Nurwahidah. 2025. "A New Form of Convolution Theorem for One-Dimensional Quaternion Linear Canonical Transform and Application" Symmetry 17, no. 7: 1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17071004

APA Style

Bahri, M., Karim, S. A. A., S., B. A., Nur, M., & Nurwahidah, N. (2025). A New Form of Convolution Theorem for One-Dimensional Quaternion Linear Canonical Transform and Application. Symmetry, 17(7), 1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17071004

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop