Abstract
This study investigates the closed forms of Lucas matrices, with a particular emphasis on the powers of the tridiagonal symmetric Toeplitz matrix , whose entries are associated with Lucas numbers . The analysis extends Filipponi’s foundational work by examining distinct cases of ordered pairs , thereby determining the precise conditions under which qualifies as a Fibonacci–Lucas matrix. Furthermore, it identifies specific conditions under which can be classified as any Fibonacci–Lucas matrix. These findings contribute to the theoretical framework of Fibonacci–Lucas matrices and provide novel insights into their structural properties.
1. Introduction
The Lucas number is defined with the recurrence relation , for the initial values , . Similarly, the Fibonacci numbers are defined by the same recurrence relation for initial values , . In addition, both sequences are given by the Binet formulas,
where known as the golden ratio and , . In the literature, a number of authors have provided alternative proofs for fundamental identities involving Lucas and Fibonacci numbers by employing methods from number theory, geometry, matrix theory, and related fields. Among these methods, the Binet formulas are frequently employed in the proofs of various interesting properties presented below, such as the following:
Furthermore, the powers of and also satisfy similar recurrence relations and are closely related to the Lucas numbers as follows:
The golden ratio, along with the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, has been studied extensively in a wide range of mathematical and geometric contexts. Key areas of research include the fundamental properties of the golden ratio, its applications to geometric problems in both two- and three-dimensional spaces, and its connections to the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, along with their generalizations. The studies highlight numerous applications of these numbers in various fields such as mathematics, physics, biology, and engineering, demonstrating their interdisciplinary significance [1,2], for example, the regular pentagon and the fifth roots of unity reveal geometric relationships with the golden ratio, as illustrated in Table 1.
Table 1.
The golden ratio with the fifth roots of unity.
Where symbol denotes the golden ratio and . For more detailed information, see [1,2,3].
Some matrices whose exponent entries are related to Fibonacci and/or Lucas numbers are called Fibonacci or Lucas matrices. The Fibonacci matrix Q was first introduced by King in his master’s thesis, and its generalizations have been extensively studied in subsequent research in [2,4]. Later, an application of the Lucas matrix to Lucas numbers was presented in [5]. This approach led to the investigation of several properties, which can be expressed through the following matrix powers:
For example, Cassini’s formulas are derived through the determinant . Moreover, the derivation of numerous Fibonacci and Lucas identities is based on matrix equations such as and , which provide a foundational framework for these studies.
Matrix methods have been widely used to derive new identities that involve the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers in [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. For example, the Pascal matrix R was used to establish identities connecting these numbers in [6]. The relationships between Fibonacci or Lucas numbers and the Pascal matrix were explored, yielding closed-form expressions for and in [7].
In [17], the author demonstrated the versatility of matrix analogues of the binomial and Waring formulas using generalized Fibonacci matrices. Washington [18] investigated Fibonacci matrices, highlighting their connections to the fifth roots of unity and the golden ratio . These expressions facilitated the derivation of various combinatorial and number-theoretic identities, revealing deeper structural connections within the Fibonacci and Lucas sequences. Furthermore, generalized Fibonacci sequences such as [13], [19], and [20] were defined and studied. These works investigated the powers of the generating matrices for these sequences and derived fundamental properties through matrix-based approaches.
In [21], Filipponi established a special symmetric tridiagonal Toeplitz matrix of order , the entries of which were considered as
The author studied closed-form expressions of the matrix by choosing as matrix entries ordered pairs from the set . The matrices involve Fibonacci numbers; in addition, sums of closed-form expressions are used to obtain some Fibonacci identities.
From [22,23], we recall the fundamental properties of the tridiagonal symmetric Toeplitz matrix of order . Notably, its eigenvalues are given by
the entries of the matrix are
the symmetry properties of the entries of matrix are noticed as
and also, since , we consider only values of x and y such that , where denotes the greatest common divisor.
The aforementioned studies highlight the rich interplay between Fibonacci–Lucas numbers and matrix theory, particularly in the context of symmetric tridiagonal Toeplitz matrices such as . Ferguson [24] extensively studied tridiagonal matrices, emphasizing their connections to the Fibonacci pseudo-group. The study presented explicit derivations of characteristic polynomials and eigenvalues, along with diverse applications spanning quantum mechanics and magneto hydrodynamics.
This study contributes to the algebraic study of Fibonacci and Lucas numbers by identifying specific conditions under which the symmetric tridiagonal Toeplitz matrices can be classified as Fibonacci or Lucas matrices. In particular, we develop a systematic method to determine the pairs that yield matrices whose powers exhibit entries expressible in terms of Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. By leveraging the spectral decomposition of , we derive closed-form expressions for the matrix entries and demonstrate how these expressions give rise to new identities involving classical number sequences. This approach not only generalizes earlier work on Fibonacci matrices but also provides a matrix-theoretic framework for exploring the interplay between recursive sequences and structured matrices. The results deepen our understanding of the algebraic and combinatorial structure underlying Fibonacci–Lucas relationships.
A novel contribution of this study lies in the detailed spectral analysis of the matrices when the entries are chosen as consecutive Lucas numbers. While previous studies have primarily focused on the role of Fibonacci numbers in matrix theory and their combinatorial interpretations, the present work extends this line of inquiry by systematically examining the algebraic and spectral structure of Lucas-based tridiagonal symmetric matrices. This approach not only uncovers new closed-form identities involving Lucas numbers but also reveals structural symmetries and recurrence behaviors that were previously unexplored in the literature. By leveraging the invariant nature of eigenvector components—expressed through fixed sine product values independent of x and y—the analysis facilitates efficient computation of matrix powers without direct matrix multiplication. This methodology not only enhances computational tractability but also bridges classical number-theoretic sequences with linear algebraic techniques, offering a fresh perspective on the interplay between integer sequences and matrix theory.
2. The Lucas Matrices
The coprimality of consecutive Lucas numbers is a well-known property in number theory. Specifically, for any , the greatest common divisor (Gcd) of and satisfies , indicating that such consecutive terms are always coprime. Based on this property, ordered pairs are frequently utilized in constructing matrices. This approach remains valid for negative indices , where the roles of the components are reversed, i.e., . This flexibility underscores the mathematical relevance of Lucas pairs in matrix construction and their associated arithmetic properties.
This section systematically explores the structure and properties of Lucas matrices by examining all relevant cases. Specific values of s are initially analyzed to illustrate particular instances, followed by a general formulation. For clarity, the analysis is structured into four subsections, each addressing distinct cases.
Table 2 presents the sine product values that are critical to these calculations. These values, which remain consistent across all matrices of the form , play a fundamental role in defining the eigenvector components, as specified in Equation (8).
Table 2.
Sine function product values in the eigenvectors of .
The values presented in Table 2 facilitate the computation of the powers of the matrix without direct dependence on its elements. By exploiting the matrix’s inherent symmetry, as described in Equation (9), these values are sufficient to determine six unique entries.
2.1. Lucas Matrices Based on Ordered Pair ,
The section begins by considering specific cases of the matrix for . In particular, the case is examined, where the matrix and its powers are analyzed with a focus on their Fibonacci–Lucas properties.
Theorem 1.
We let and denote the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. The entries of the matrix are given as
where the symbol is the greatest integer function for any real numbers x and stands for (n odd) or (n even).
Proof.
Utilizing the general formula provided in Equation (8) for the entries of the matrix , we have
Table 3.
Eigenvalues of the matrix .
To evaluate the entry , we substitute the relevant values from Table 2 and Table 3 into Equation (13):
Using the Binet forms provided in Equation (1), we can further simplify for odd and even n as follows:
Similar arguments, applied to other elements of the matrix, yield the expressions in Equations (10)–(12). The proof proceeds as follows:
- (i)
- (ii)
- Apply sine product values from Table 2.
- (iii)
- Use the Binet formulas to express results in terms of and .
These calculations, which leverage the symmetry of , are omitted for brevity but follow the same principles using values from Table 2 and Table 3. □
To illustrate the growth behavior of the matrix entries for higher powers n, we analyzed the six algebraically independent elements of the matrix as identified in Equation (9). These include the diagonal terms and , as well as the symmetric off-diagonal entries such as , among others. Figure 1 displays the numerical growth of these six entries for . The plot reveals that all components increase rapidly with n, exhibiting exponential-like behavior, particularly in off-diagonal elements closer to the matrix center, which suggests stronger propagation effects through the recursive structure of .
Figure 1.
Growth trends of the matrix for .
This experiment confirms the exponential nature of growth in matrix entries derived from Fibonacci-based closed forms. The plotted behavior also supports the theoretical results discussed in the manuscript.
Continuing from the pattern established in the previous example, we now examine the matrix corresponding to the pair . The resulting eigenvalues and associated sine product values are summarized in Table 2 and Table 4 and used to compute the matrix entries .
Table 4.
Eigenvalues of the matrix .
Theorem 2.
We let and represent the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. The entries of the matrix are expressed as
where the symbol is the greatest integer function for any real number x, stands for (n odd) or (n even), and we let
where the symbol is the binomial coefficient, , otherwise 0.
Proof.
According to Equation (8), the entries of the matrix are expressed based on pairs . By substituting values in the Table 2 and Table 4, we find
By using the Binet formulas for Fibonacci and Lucas numbers in Equation (1), and defining the auxiliary sum
we express the result in a more compact form. Additionally, we define
In general, we investigate how the elements of the matrix relate to Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. Specifically, we derive closed-form expressions for its entries and demonstrate their dependence on and .
Theorem 3.
We let and denote the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. The entries of the matrix are given as
where the symbol is the greatest integer function for any real number x and stands for (n even) or (n odd); we let
where the symbol is the binomial coefficient, .
Proof.
Similar computations for yield the remaining eigenvalues, leading to the construction of Table 5.
Table 5.
Eigenvalues of the matrix .
Substituting the corresponding values from Table 2 and Table 5 into Equation (8) for the entry , we obtain
After simplification using Binet formulas in Equation (1), we obtain
Now, we include a comparative discussion to highlight the differences in complexity and combinatorial interpretation between the Fibonacci matrix in [16] and the Lucas matrix . From a structural viewpoint, both matrix families share a binomial-based formulation, as shown in the appropriate theorems for Fibonacci matrices and its Lucas counterpart. However, notable distinctions arise in the nature of the sequences and the recursive dependencies involved.
In the Fibonacci case [16], the entries are expressed as linear combinations of Fibonacci numbers with coefficients derived from binomial terms involving powers of and and convolution with a shifted Fibonacci term:
This structure reflects a straightforward combinatorial construction based solely on the Fibonacci sequence.
In contrast, the Lucas case introduces additional complexity through two mechanisms.
Hybrid Fibonacci–Lucas Selection: The function , defined such that for odd n, and for even n, introduces conditional behavior in the main term. This alternating dependency complicates both combinatorial interpretation and closed-form analysis, especially for large n.
Shifted Fibonacci Convolution with Lucas Coefficients: The auxiliary term given by
combines Lucas sequence coefficients with Fibonacci indices. This convolution blends two distinct second-order linear recursions and requires the tracking of cross-sequence interactions over varying shifts , leading to a more complex combinatorial representation.
Furthermore, in terms of computational complexity, the Fibonacci expressions grow polynomially in terms of the number of arithmetic operations with clear recurrence depth, while the Lucas matrix entries, due to the mixed-sequence summations and parity-conditioned behavior, involve additional branching and sequence evaluation, increasing the computational overhead. These differences underscore the richer structural and algebraic behavior encoded in the Lucas matrix formulation.
We present this comparative discussion specifically for the initial part of the study, as the structural patterns and combinatorial interpretations in subsequent sections follow similar principles. Therefore, a separate discussion section is not included. Nonetheless, we clearly articulate the generalizations and conclusions in each corresponding section of the manuscript.
In [21], Filipponi presented various sum and difference identities involving entries of the matrix . Analogous examples can be constructed for the matrix based on its entries given in Equations (17)–(19). Now, the matrix is also expressed in terms of and as follows:
In addition, the matrix is expressed according to the matrices and given in [21] as follows:
2.2. Lucas Matrices Based on the Ordered Pair ,
In this section, we first consider the special case , with the ordered pair , where and . As noted in the study by Filipponi (1997) [21], the matrix already coincides with this case and thus requires no modification. For the case , we examine the ordered pair , corresponding to the matrix .
Theorem 4.
We let and denote the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. The entries of the matrix are given by
where the symbol denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to a real number x, and where denotes if n is odd, and if n is even. The quantity is given by
where is the binomial coefficient, defined for , and is zero otherwise.
Proof.
For the matrix , using the expressions in Equations (4)–(6) and the values from Table 1, we obtain the eigenvalues listed in Table 6.
Table 6.
Eigenvalues of the matrix .
By substituting the corresponding values from Table 2 and Table 6 into Equation (8) for the pair , the entry is given by
By applying the Binet formulas in Equation (1), and considering the parity of n and t, the desired results follow. The proofs of Equations (24)–(26) are obtained by evaluating the corresponding matrix entries for each ordered pair , using the values from Table 2 and Table 6 in conjunction with Equation (8). □
Finally, according to the ordered pair , we derive a closed-form expression for the entries of the matrix .
Theorem 5.
We let and denote the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. The entries of the matrix are
where denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x, if n is odd, and if n is even, and
with denoting the binomial coefficient, .
Proof.
By employing the values from Table 1 together with Equations (4)–(6), we obtain the eigenvalues presented in Table 7.
Table 7.
Eigenvalues of the matrix .
Moreover, the matrix can be expressed in terms of the matrices and , as presented in [21], as follows:
These formulations provide a deeper understanding of the relationship between the matrix entries given in Equations (27)–(29) and the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. In particular, the matrix can be expanded as
Furthermore, the matrix can be represented in terms of and by identity
2.3. Lucas Matrices Based on the Ordered Pair ,
In this subsection, we examine matrices constructed using the ordered pair , where . Although the parameter s is taken as non-negative for notational convenience, the subscripts and correspond to Lucas numbers with negative indices. This formulation allows us to systematically analyze cases involving negative-indexed terms while maintaining consistency with the structure of the previous sections. In the special case where , corresponding to the ordered pair , the matrix takes the following form:
Theorem 6.
We let and denote the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. Then, the entries of the matrix are given by
where denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x and stands for (n even) or (n odd).
Proof.
To derive the results presented in Table 8 for the matrix , we utilize the identities given in Equations (4)–(6) together with the values listed in Table 1.
Table 8.
Eigenvalues of the matrix .
In the special case where , the ordered pair becomes , and the matrix takes the following form:
Theorem 7.
We let and denote the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. Then, the entries of the matrix are given by
where the symbol denotes the floor function (i.e., the greatest integer less than or equal to x) and the symbol denotes the Lucas number when n is odd, and the Fibonacci number when n is even, and
with representing the binomial coefficient, where (and zero otherwise).
Proof.
Using the matrix along with the identities in Equations (4)–(6) and the eigenvalues listed in Table 9, we derive the stated results.
Table 9.
Eigenvalues of the matrix .
Considering the identity for Lucas numbers with negative indices given in Equation (2), we have . Using these identities, if we define the matrix entries with the pair , then the following relation holds:
Theorem 8.
We let and denote the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. Then the entries of the matrix are given by
where denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x, if n is odd, and if n is even. Additionally, the function is given by
where denotes the binomial coefficient and is taken to be zero for or .
Proof.
Using the identities given in Equations (4)–(6), along with the values provided in Table 1, we compute the eigenvalues of the matrix as shown in Table 10.
Table 10.
Eigenvalues of the matrix .
Extending our analysis to the matrices formed by negative-indexed Lucas numbers, we present new expressions involving matrix entries related to and (or equivalently ), as previously discussed in [16]. Specifically, we obtain the following identities:
These representations provide new insights into the structure of the matrix , revealing further algebraic and combinatorial properties inherent in the Fibonacci matrix framework.
Moreover, as shown in [16], the matrix can be expressed in terms of and as follows:
These identities deepen our understanding of the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers interplay in the structure of powers of tridiagonal matrices.
2.4. Lucas Matrices Based on the Ordered Pair for
In this part, we consider the matrices defined by the ordered pair , where and thus both subscripts are negative. This case complements the previous subsection by reversing the order of the components, further enriching the analysis of matrices constructed from negatively indexed Lucas numbers. For the case , the identity , which follows from Equation (2), allows us to explicitly compute the powers of the matrix .
Theorem 9.
We let denote the Fibonacci number. Then, the entries of the matrix are given by
where denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x, for any real number x.
Proof.
Using the identities provided in Equations (4)–(6) and the values in Table 1, we have the eigenvalue powers presented in Table 11
Table 11.
Eigenvalues of the matrix .
For the ordered pair , the matrix is given.
Theorem 10.
We let and denote the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. The elements of the matrix , corresponding to the ordered pair , are given by
where the symbol is the greatest integer function for any real number x, where the symbol denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x, stands for (n odd) or (n even), and
where the symbol is the binomial coefficient, , otherwise 0.
Proof.
To determine the entries of the matrix , we utilize Equations (4)–(6) along with the values from Table 1. The relevant eigenvalues of the matrix are organized in Table 12.
Table 12.
Eigenvalues of the matrix .
To extend these formulations by using the expressions in Equation (2), , as shown in Equation (8) for the ordered pair elements , where , the matrix is expressed as follows:
Theorem 11.
We let and denote the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. The entries of the matrix are given by
where denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x, is defined as if n is odd and if n is even, and
where the symbol is the binomial coefficient, , otherwise 0.
Proof.
By applying Table 1 and Table 2 together with Equations (4)–(6), for the pair , we obtain the eigenvalues listed in Table 13.
Table 13.
Eigenvalues of the matrix .
Extending our analysis to the matrices formed by negatively indexed Lucas numbers, we derive expressions involving the entries of and (or ) as presented in Koken and Aksoy [16]:
This progression facilitates the derivation of novel representations for the matrix , offering deeper insights into the algebraic and combinatorial structures inherent in the Fibonacci matrix framework.
Moreover, the matrix , as introduced in Koken and Aksoy [16], can be expressed in terms of and by the following identity:
3. Discussion and Recommendation
The findings presented in this study, particularly the closed-form expressions derived for the powers of the matrix in Section 2.1, Section 2.2, Section 2.3 and Section 2.4, provide significant insight into the algebraic structure of these matrices when x and y are selected as consecutive or symmetric Lucas numbers.
Special emphasis was placed on pairs satisfying the coprimality condition in order to explore the implications of such algebraic relationships in matrix constructions. Several avenues for future research were identified. These include extending the study to matrices defined by other coprime pairs such as , , and , as well as deriving general expressions for the entries of matrices based on these pairs. Further investigations could also focus on summation and difference identities derived from the closed-form expressions, as well as an examination of these results using matrix norms and algebraic operations.
An additional promising direction involves analyzing the behavior of the matrices under advanced matrix operations such as the Hadamard, Kronecker, Khatri–Rao, and Tracy–Singh products. These algebraic constructions may reveal novel identities and uncover intricate relationships between Lucas and Fibonacci matrices. Such investigations could deepen our understanding of their underlying algebraic and spectral structures, possibly leading to broader generalizations and new combinatorial interpretations.
The theoretical developments established in this work provide a foundational framework for both pure and applied mathematical research. The matrix family , characterized by its tridiagonal symmetric structure and recursive Lucas-based entries, exhibits a rich algebraic form that invites further exploration. The closed-form expressions and recurrence behaviors identified herein offer a starting point for extending this framework to larger matrix dimensions or alternative recursive sequences.
From an applied perspective, Lucas-based tridiagonal matrices such as those studied in this paper arise naturally in various domains of discrete mathematics. In combinatorics, for instance, the number of ways to tile a board using a combination of unit squares and dominoes—with tiling weights governed by Lucas-type recursions—can be encoded via the powers of a suitably defined matrix. The matrix parameters reflect the recursive structure of the Lucas sequence, allowing for elegant representations of tiling configurations through matrix exponentiation.
In network theory, the matrix may serve as the adjacency or Laplacian matrix of a path or cycle graph with m vertices, where edge weights evolve according to a Lucas sequence. In such settings, the spectral properties of influence fundamental network behaviors, including diffusion dynamics, signal propagation, and stability conditions. The recursive nature of the weights introduces a structured complexity that may yield insights into the design and analysis of weighted networks with deterministic, number-theoretic constraints.
Overall, the results presented in this study highlight the versatility and depth of Lucas-based matrix families. Future research can focus on generalizing these structures to broader matrix classes and exploring their implications across discrete models, algebraic combinatorics, and spectral graph theory.
4. Conclusions
This study introduced a method for determining the values of x and y for which the matrix , constructed from the ordered pair with x and y being Lucas numbers, can be characterized as a Lucas matrix in a generalized framework.
In Section 2.1, Section 2.2, Section 2.3 and Section 2.4, we derived closed-form expressions for both specific and generalized entries of the matrix , corresponding to various ordered pairs, including , , , and .
In addition to the theoretical contributions discussed, this study briefly touched upon potential application areas of the proposed matrices . While these applications were mentioned to illustrate the broader relevance of the work, a more detailed exploration was intentionally deferred to future studies. The primary objective of this paper was to establish the algebraic structure and spectral properties of the matrices , particularly when constructed from coprime pairs of Lucas numbers.
The results presented in this paper establish a robust algebraic framework for the study of Lucas-based matrix structures and their closed-form behaviors. We expect that subsequent research will leverage this framework to advance both the theoretical development and practical deployment of such matrices in domains including coding theory, signal processing, and combinatorial optimization.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, F.K. and M.A.; methodology, F.K.; software, F.K.; validation, M.A. and F.K.; formal analysis, M.A.; investigation, M.A.; resources, F.K.; data curation, M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.; writing—review and editing, F.K.; visualization, M.A.; supervision, F.K.; project administration, F.K.; funding acquisition, F.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Acknowledgments
We thank the blinded reviewers in advance for their valuable feedback and constructive comments, which we believe contributes significantly to enhancing the quality of this manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Debnath, L. A short history of the Fibonacci and golden numbers with their applications. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 42, 337–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koshy, T. Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers with Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
- Dunlap, R.A. The Golden Ratio and Fibonacci Numbers; World Scientific: Singapore, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Silvester, J.R. Fibonacci properties by matrix methods. Math. Gaz. 1979, 63, 188–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koken, F.; Bozkurt, D. On Lucas Numbers by the Matrix Method. Hacettepe Univ. Fac. Sci. 2010, 9, 471–475. [Google Scholar]
- Hoggatt, V.E.; Bicknell, M. Some New Fibonacci Identities. Fibonacci Q. 1964, 2, 29–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koken, F. The Representations of the Fibonacci and Lucas Matrices. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A Sci. 2019, 43, 2443–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehmer, D.H. Fibonacci and Related Sequences in Periodic Tridiagonal Matrices. Fibonacci Q. 1975, 13, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dazheng, L. Fibonacci Matrices. Fibonacci Q. 1999, 37, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elia, M. A note on Fibonacci matrices of even degree. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2001, 27, 457–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dazheng, L. Fibonacci-Lucas Quasi-Cyclic Matrices. Fibonacci Q. 2002, 40, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirtürk, B. Fibonacci and Lucas sums by matrix methods. Proc. Int. Math. Forum 2010, 5, 99–107. [Google Scholar]
- Cerda-Morales, G. An interesting generalized Fibonacci sequence: A two-by-two matrix representation. Afr. Mat. 2021, 32, 695–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasad, K.; Mahato, H. Cryptography using generalized Fibonacci matrices with Affine-Hill cipher. J. Discret. Math. Sci. Cryptogr. 2022, 25, 2341–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasad, K.; Mahato, H. On the generalized Fibonacci like sequences and matrices. Ann. Math. Inform. 2023, 59, 102–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koken, F.; Aksoy, M. Characterization of Fibonacci Matrices via Tridiagonal Symmetric Toeplitz Structures. Filomat, 2025; accepted. [Google Scholar]
- Filipponi, P. Waring’s Formula, the Binomial Formula, and Generalized Fibonacci Matrices. Fibonacci Q. 1992, 30, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Washington, L.C. Some Remarks on Fibonacci Matrices. Fibonacci Q. 1999, 37, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jun, S.P.; Choi, K.H. Some properties of the generalized Fibonacci sequence qn by matrix methods. Korean J. Math. 2016, 24, 681–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wani, A.A.; Rathore, G.P.S.; Badshah, V.H.; Sisodiya, K. A Two-by-Two matrix representation of a generalized Fibonacci sequence. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 2018, 47, 637–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filipponi, P. A Family of 4-by-4 Fibonacci Matrices. Fibonacci Q. 1997, 35, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gantmakher, F.R. The Theory of Matrices; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2000; Volume 131. [Google Scholar]
- Strang, G. Introduction to Linear Algebra, 4th ed.; Wellesley-Cambridge Press: Wellesley, MA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Ferguson, H.R.P. The Fibonacci Pseudogroup, Characteristic Polynomials and Eigenvalues of Tridiagonal Matrices, Periodic Linear Recurrence Systems and Application to Quantum Mechanics. Fibonacci Q. 1978, 16, 435–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).