The coprimality of consecutive Lucas numbers is a well-known property in number theory. Specifically, for any , the greatest common divisor (Gcd) of and satisfies , indicating that such consecutive terms are always coprime. Based on this property, ordered pairs are frequently utilized in constructing matrices. This approach remains valid for negative indices , where the roles of the components are reversed, i.e., . This flexibility underscores the mathematical relevance of Lucas pairs in matrix construction and their associated arithmetic properties.
This section systematically explores the structure and properties of Lucas matrices by examining all relevant cases. Specific values of s are initially analyzed to illustrate particular instances, followed by a general formulation. For clarity, the analysis is structured into four subsections, each addressing distinct cases.
2.1. Lucas Matrices Based on Ordered Pair ,
The section begins by considering specific cases of the matrix for . In particular, the case is examined, where the matrix and its powers are analyzed with a focus on their Fibonacci–Lucas properties.
Theorem 1. We let and denote the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. The entries of the matrix are given aswhere the symbol is the greatest integer function for any real numbers x and stands for (n odd) or (n even). Proof. Utilizing the general formula provided in Equation (
8) for the entries of the matrix
, we have
where
. Substituting the corresponding values from Equations (
4)–(
6) and using the values presented in
Table 1, we summarize the eigenvalues related terms in
Table 3.
To evaluate the entry
, we substitute the relevant values from
Table 2 and
Table 3 into Equation (
13):
Using the Binet forms provided in Equation (
1), we can further simplify
for odd and even
n as follows:
Similar arguments, applied to other elements of the matrix, yield the expressions in Equations (
10)–(
12). The proof proceeds as follows:
- (i)
Substitute eigenvalues from
Table 3 into Equation (
13).
- (ii)
Apply sine product values from
Table 2.
- (iii)
Use the Binet formulas to express results in terms of and .
These calculations, which leverage the symmetry of
, are omitted for brevity but follow the same principles using values from
Table 2 and
Table 3. □
To illustrate the growth behavior of the matrix entries for higher powers
n, we analyzed the six algebraically independent elements of the matrix
as identified in Equation (
9). These include the diagonal terms
and
, as well as the symmetric off-diagonal entries such as
, among others.
Figure 1 displays the numerical growth of these six entries for
. The plot reveals that all components increase rapidly with
n, exhibiting exponential-like behavior, particularly in off-diagonal elements closer to the matrix center, which suggests stronger propagation effects through the recursive structure of
.
This experiment confirms the exponential nature of growth in matrix entries derived from Fibonacci-based closed forms. The plotted behavior also supports the theoretical results discussed in the manuscript.
Continuing from the pattern established in the previous example, we now examine the matrix
corresponding to the pair
. The resulting eigenvalues and associated sine product values are summarized in
Table 2 and
Table 4 and used to compute the matrix entries
.
Theorem 2. We let and represent the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. The entries of the matrix are expressed aswhere the symbol is the greatest integer function for any real number x, stands for (n odd) or (n even), and we letwhere the symbol is the binomial coefficient, , otherwise 0. Proof. By using the values in
Table 1 along with Equations (
4)–(
6), we construct
Table 4.
According to Equation (
8), the entries of the matrix
are expressed based on pairs
. By substituting values in the
Table 2 and
Table 4, we find
By using the Binet formulas for Fibonacci and Lucas numbers in Equation (
1), and defining the auxiliary sum
we express the result in a more compact form. Additionally, we define
Applying this structure to other entries and using the symmetry of
, we obtain the remaining elements in (
14)–(
16). The derivation for each case follows similarly by choosing appropriate index pairs
and applying the same expansion technique. □
In general, we investigate how the elements of the matrix relate to Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. Specifically, we derive closed-form expressions for its entries and demonstrate their dependence on and .
Theorem 3. We let and denote the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. The entries of the matrix are given aswhere the symbol is the greatest integer function for any real number x and stands for (n even) or (n odd); we letwhere the symbol is the binomial coefficient, . Proof. For the case
, by using the expressions in Equations (
4)–(
6) and
Table 1, we obtain
Similar computations for
yield the remaining eigenvalues, leading to the construction of
Table 5.
Substituting the corresponding values from
Table 2 and
Table 5 into Equation (
8) for the entry
, we obtain
After simplification using Binet formulas in Equation (
1), we obtain
Other elements not proven here are found similarly using appropriate values from the
Table 2 and
Table 5. □
Now, we include a comparative discussion to highlight the differences in complexity and combinatorial interpretation between the Fibonacci matrix
in [
16] and the Lucas matrix
. From a structural viewpoint, both matrix families share a binomial-based formulation, as shown in the appropriate theorems for Fibonacci matrices and its Lucas counterpart. However, notable distinctions arise in the nature of the sequences and the recursive dependencies involved.
In the Fibonacci case [
16], the entries are expressed as linear combinations of Fibonacci numbers with coefficients derived from binomial terms involving powers of
and
and convolution with a shifted Fibonacci term:
This structure reflects a straightforward combinatorial construction based solely on the Fibonacci sequence.
In contrast, the Lucas case introduces additional complexity through two mechanisms.
Hybrid Fibonacci–Lucas Selection: The function , defined such that for odd n, and for even n, introduces conditional behavior in the main term. This alternating dependency complicates both combinatorial interpretation and closed-form analysis, especially for large n.
Shifted Fibonacci Convolution with Lucas Coefficients: The auxiliary term
given by
combines Lucas sequence coefficients with Fibonacci indices. This convolution blends two distinct second-order linear recursions and requires the tracking of cross-sequence interactions over varying shifts
, leading to a more complex combinatorial representation.
Furthermore, in terms of computational complexity, the Fibonacci expressions grow polynomially in terms of the number of arithmetic operations with clear recurrence depth, while the Lucas matrix entries, due to the mixed-sequence summations and parity-conditioned behavior, involve additional branching and sequence evaluation, increasing the computational overhead. These differences underscore the richer structural and algebraic behavior encoded in the Lucas matrix formulation.
We present this comparative discussion specifically for the initial part of the study, as the structural patterns and combinatorial interpretations in subsequent sections follow similar principles. Therefore, a separate discussion section is not included. Nonetheless, we clearly articulate the generalizations and conclusions in each corresponding section of the manuscript.
In [
21], Filipponi presented various sum and difference identities involving entries of the matrix
. Analogous examples can be constructed for the matrix
based on its entries given in Equations (
17)–(
19). Now, the matrix
is also expressed in terms of
and
as follows:
In addition, the matrix
is expressed according to the matrices
and
given in [
21] as follows:
These results provide a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between the matrix entries in Equations (
17)–(
19) and Fibonacci numbers within the context of the matrix
as expressed in Equations (
22) and (
23). Specifically, we have
Moreover, by applying the results in [
7,
21] together with Equations (
21)–(
23), one can derive various finite sum identities involving Fibonacci numbers. We leave these derivations to the interested reader.
2.3. Lucas Matrices Based on the Ordered Pair ,
In this subsection, we examine matrices constructed using the ordered pair , where . Although the parameter s is taken as non-negative for notational convenience, the subscripts and correspond to Lucas numbers with negative indices. This formulation allows us to systematically analyze cases involving negative-indexed terms while maintaining consistency with the structure of the previous sections. In the special case where , corresponding to the ordered pair , the matrix takes the following form:
Theorem 6. We let and denote the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. Then, the entries of the matrix are given bywhere denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x and stands for (n even) or (n odd). Proof. To derive the results presented in
Table 8 for the matrix
, we utilize the identities given in Equations (
4)–(
6) together with the values listed in
Table 1.
If appropriate values from
Table 2 and
Table 8 are substituted into Equation (
8) for
, we obtain
From the Binet formula in Equation (
1) depending on whether
n is odd or even, we find
By substituting the appropriate values of the ordered pair
from
Table 2 and
Table 8 into Equation (
8), we obtain the remaining entries and thereby complete the proof of Equations (
32)–(
34). □
In the special case where , the ordered pair becomes , and the matrix takes the following form:
Theorem 7. We let and denote the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. Then, the entries of the matrix are given bywhere the symbol denotes the floor function (i.e., the greatest integer less than or equal to x) and the symbol denotes the Lucas number when n is odd, and the Fibonacci number when n is even, andwith representing the binomial coefficient, where (and zero otherwise). Proof. Using the matrix
along with the identities in Equations (
4)–(
6) and the eigenvalues listed in
Table 9, we derive the stated results.
Substituting the relevant values from
Table 2 and
Table 9 into Equation (
8) for the entry with
, we obtain
By applying Binet formulas in Equation (
1) and considering the parity of
n, we deduce
The proofs of the other entries in Equations (
35)–(
37) follow from similar arguments, by substituting the corresponding values for
from
Table 2 and
Table 9 into Equation (
8). □
Considering the identity for Lucas numbers with negative indices given in Equation (
2), we have
. Using these identities, if we define the matrix entries with the pair
, then the following relation holds:
Theorem 8. We let and denote the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. Then the entries of the matrix are given bywhere denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x, if n is odd, and if n is even. Additionally, the function is given bywhere denotes the binomial coefficient and is taken to be zero for or . Proof. Using the identities given in Equations (
4)–(
6), along with the values provided in
Table 1, we compute the eigenvalues of the matrix
as shown in
Table 10.
By substituting the eigenvalue expressions from
Table 2 and
Table 10 into Equation (
8) for the position
, we obtain
Applying the Binet formulas from Equation (
1) and simplifying based on the parity of
n, we deduce
The remaining matrix entries in Equations (
38)–(
40) follow similarly by substituting the corresponding eigenvalues from
Table 2 and
Table 10 into Equation (
8). □
Extending our analysis to the matrices
formed by negative-indexed Lucas numbers, we present new expressions involving matrix entries related to
and
(or equivalently
), as previously discussed in [
16]. Specifically, we obtain the following identities:
These representations provide new insights into the structure of the matrix , revealing further algebraic and combinatorial properties inherent in the Fibonacci matrix framework.
Moreover, as shown in [
16], the matrix
can be expressed in terms of
and
as follows:
These identities deepen our understanding of the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers interplay in the structure of powers of tridiagonal matrices.
2.4. Lucas Matrices Based on the Ordered Pair for
In this part, we consider the matrices defined by the ordered pair
, where
and thus both subscripts are negative. This case complements the previous subsection by reversing the order of the components, further enriching the analysis of matrices constructed from negatively indexed Lucas numbers. For the case
, the identity
, which follows from Equation (
2), allows us to explicitly compute the powers of the matrix
.
Theorem 9. We let denote the Fibonacci number. Then, the entries of the matrix are given bywhere denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x, for any real number x. Proof. Using the identities provided in Equations (
4)–(
6) and the values in
Table 1, we have the eigenvalue powers presented in
Table 11Substituting the relevant values from
Table 2 and
Table 11 into Equation (
8) for the pair
, we obtain
The desired closed-form expression follows by applying the Binet formula from Equation (
1). Similarly, by evaluating Equation (
8) for the ordered pairs
using the eigenvalues in
Table 2 and
Table 11, the remaining identities are established. □
For the ordered pair , the matrix is given.
Theorem 10. We let and denote the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. The elements of the matrix , corresponding to the ordered pair , are given bywhere the symbol is the greatest integer function for any real number x, where the symbol denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x, stands for (n odd) or (n even), andwhere the symbol is the binomial coefficient, , otherwise 0. Proof. To determine the entries of the matrix
, we utilize Equations (
4)–(
6) along with the values from
Table 1. The relevant eigenvalues of the matrix
are organized in
Table 12.
To derive the element
corresponding to the index pair
, we substitute the relevant values from
Table 2 and
Table 12 into Equation (
8):
By analyzing the parity of
n and
t and applying the Binet formulas in Equation (
1), we obtain
The derivations for the remaining matrix entries follow analogously by substituting the corresponding values from
Table 2 and
Table 12 into Equation (
8). □
To extend these formulations by using the expressions in Equation (
2),
,
as shown in Equation (
8) for the ordered pair elements
, where
, the matrix
is expressed as follows:
Theorem 11. We let and denote the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively. The entries of the matrix are given bywhere denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x, is defined as if n is odd and if n is even, andwhere the symbol is the binomial coefficient, , otherwise 0. Proof. By applying
Table 1 and
Table 2 together with Equations (
4)–(
6), for the pair
, we obtain the eigenvalues listed in
Table 13.
If the values from
Table 2 and
Table 13 are substituted into Equation (
8) for
, we obtain
Depending on the parity of
n and using Equation (
1), we obtain
The remaining entries can be derived analogously by applying similar computations using the corresponding values from
Table 2 and
Table 13. □
Extending our analysis to the matrices
formed by negatively indexed Lucas numbers, we derive expressions involving the entries of
and
(or
) as presented in Koken and Aksoy [
16]:
This progression facilitates the derivation of novel representations for the matrix , offering deeper insights into the algebraic and combinatorial structures inherent in the Fibonacci matrix framework.
Moreover, the matrix
, as introduced in Koken and Aksoy [
16], can be expressed in terms of
and
by the following identity: