Correction: Lin et al. A Perception Study for Unit Charts in the Context of Large-Magnitude Data Representation. Symmetry 2023, 15, 219
1
School of Design Art and Media, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210014, China
2
School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2023, 15(4), 892; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15040892
Submission received: 28 March 2023
/
Accepted: 29 March 2023
/
Published: 10 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances on Engineering Graphics: Improvements and New Proposals, Volume 2)
Text Correction
There were two errors in the original publication [1].
- 1.
- Post hoc multiple comparisons are not described in the format of APA.
The following correction has been made to Section 3. Experiment 1: Measurement for the Discrimination Threshold of Unit Charts, Section 3.5. Results, Paragraph 1:
“The overview of collected JND data is shown in Figure 4a. The data were analyzed using SPSS statistical computer software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical analysis included one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-b or Tamhane tests, as required for each variable [54]. The box plot is shown in Figure 4b, and no outliers were identified. Post hoc multiple comparisons were determined using the Tamhane procedure, and the results showed that the mean JND of unit charts when representing tens digits (M = 7.35 px) is significantly lower than that when characterizing hundreds digits (M = 8.38 px) and thousands digits (M = 9.29 px). The results of multiple comparisons are shown in Table 1. Unit charts that represent larger magnitudes had larger mean JNDs.”
- 2.
- Wrong choice of Data Availability Statement template.
The following correction has been made to the Data Availability Statement:
“Data available on request due to restrictions (e.g., privacy or ethical reasons). The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy reasons.”
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected by the above changes. These corrections were approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Reference
- Lin, Y.; Tang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Song, F.; Tang, W. A Perception Study for Unit Charts in the Context of Large-Magnitude Data Representation. Symmetry 2023, 15, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Lin, Y.; Tang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Song, F.; Tang, W. Correction: Lin et al. A Perception Study for Unit Charts in the Context of Large-Magnitude Data Representation. Symmetry 2023, 15, 219. Symmetry 2023, 15, 892. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15040892
AMA Style
Lin Y, Tang Y, Zhu Y, Song F, Tang W. Correction: Lin et al. A Perception Study for Unit Charts in the Context of Large-Magnitude Data Representation. Symmetry 2023, 15, 219. Symmetry. 2023; 15(4):892. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15040892
Chicago/Turabian StyleLin, Yun, Yi Tang, Yanfei Zhu, Fangbin Song, and Wenzhe Tang. 2023. "Correction: Lin et al. A Perception Study for Unit Charts in the Context of Large-Magnitude Data Representation. Symmetry 2023, 15, 219" Symmetry 15, no. 4: 892. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15040892
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
