You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Charles Schwartz

Reviewer 1: Ayub Samadi Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear author,

I have reviewed the paper carefully. The article has been written nice and the novelty of the article is also good. I recommend the acceptance of the paper after doing minor revisions as follows:

1.I dont see applicable example in this article?

2.The introduction section is weak. I recommend rewritten.  The novelty of your work must be written in the introduction.

3.References section must be checked.

Thanks.

Author Response

  1. Your request for "applicable example" led me to a major addition to and improvement of this paper: See the new subsections 5.1 and 5.2
  2.  I have added text, emphasizing the novelty of this work, in the Abstract, the Introduction, and the Conclusion.
  3. The Reference section data has been reformulated as requested.

Reviewer 2 Report

My comments are in the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

  1. I have added details of the Dirac equation as requested.
  2. I have changed the equation numbering system, as requested.
  3. I have used spellcheck and found no errors of that sort.