Next Article in Journal
Deformation Intensity Distribution and Zoning of Seismic Deformation Fields in Near-Fault Areas
Next Article in Special Issue
Harmonic Blaschke–Minkowski Homomorphism
Previous Article in Journal
Data Security and Preservation Mechanisms for Industrial Control Network Using IOTA
Previous Article in Special Issue
Riemann–Hilbert Approach for Constructing Analytical Solutions and Conservation Laws of a Local Time-Fractional Nonlinear Schrödinger Type Equation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lie Symmetries and Conservation Laws of Fokas–Lenells Equation and Two Coupled Fokas–Lenells Equations by the Symmetry/Adjoint Symmetry Pair Method

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2022, 14(2), 238; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020238
Submission received: 30 October 2021 / Revised: 6 December 2021 / Accepted: 8 December 2021 / Published: 26 January 2022

Abstract

:
The Fokas–Lenells equation and its multi-component coupled forms have attracted the attention of many mathematical physicists. The Fokas–Lenells equation and two coupled Fokas–Lenells equations are investigated from the perspective of Lie symmetries and conservation laws. The three systems have been turned into real multi-component coupled systems by appropriate transformations. By procedures of symmetry analysis, Lie symmetries of the three real systems are obtained. Explicit conservation laws are constructed using the symmetry/adjoint symmetry pair method, which depends on Lie symmetries and adjoint symmetries. The relationships between the multiplier and the adjoint symmetry are investigated.

1. Introduction

For nonlinear differential equations [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12], differential-difference equations [13,14,15], and fractional differential equations [16,17,18,19,20], it is important to admit Lie symmetries [1,2,10,15]. By means of Lie symmetries, one can reduce the order of nonlinear systems, get group-invariant solutions or perform Lie symmetries classifications [1,2]. Based on the original work of Noether, one symmetry corresponds to a conservation law for partial differential equations (PDEs) with classical Lagrangians [3]. However, there are many important PDEs without classical Lagrangians. Researchers have made many generalizations of Noether’s work, so that conservation laws can be investigated whether the equations possess classical Lagrangians or not [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Among these, the symmetry/adjoint symmetry pair (SA) method [5,6,13] is one of the most efficient methods, and it relies on the Lie symmetries and adjoint symmetries of nonlinear systems. In this paper, the SA method will be taken to investigate conservation laws of three Fokas–Lenells equations. We will show that the SA method is very effective in finding conservation laws of multi-component coupled systems.
The Fokas–Lenells (FL) equation:
I U t α U t x + γ U x x + σ | U | 2 ( U + I α U x ) = 0 ,         σ = ± 1
was proposed by Fokas [21], where U is a complex function dependent on x and t , and α and γ are real constants ( α 0 , γ 0 ) . The optical application of Equation (1) as well as the relationships between Equation (1) and the nonlinear Schrödinger equation have been stated [22]. The integrability properties, asymptotic behavior of the solutions, and analytical solutions have been studied in [23,24,25,26,27,28,29].
The coupled FL equations have the expression:
U x t + α β 2 U 2 I α β U x α U x x + I α β 2 U V U x = 0 , V x t + α β 2 V + 2 I α β V x α V x x I α β 2 U V V x = 0 ,
where U and V are both complex functions dependent on x and t , α and β are real numbers, and α 0 , β 0 [30]. Analytical solutions of Equation (2) have been obtained by Darboux transformation [31]. Based on the determinant representation of the Darboux transformation, higher-order soliton solutions of Equation (2) have been derived in [32]. When α = β = 1 , rogue wave and n-order rogue waves have been studied in [33,34].
Another coupled FL equations have the form:
I U x t 2 I U x x + 4 U x ( 2 | U | 2 + | V | 2 ) U x U V * V x + 2 I U = 0 , I V x t 2 I V x x + 4 V x ( 2 | V | 2 + | U | 2 ) V x V U * U x + 2 I V = 0 ,
where U and V are both complex functions dependent on x and t , and the asterisk represents a complex conjugation. It was show that Equation (3) has a multi-Hamiltonian integrability [35]. One-soliton solutions, higher-order-soliton solutions and other solutions have been studied in [36,37,38].
To the best of our knowledge, the Lie symmetries and explicit conservation laws of Equations (1)–(3) possess much mathematical and physical significance, and they have not been reported. The framework of the rest is shown in what follows. In Section 2, we first transform the FL equation and two coupled FL equations into real equations, then search for their Lie symmetries by the classical Lie symmetry method. In Section 3, conservation laws related to the three systems will be found by making use of the SA method. In Section 4, some closing words and discussions are presented.

2. Lie Symmetry Analysis of Equations (1)–(3)

Suppose that:
U = u + I v ,
with u and v being real functions dependent on x and t , then the FL Equation (1) is changed to:
Δ 1 u t α v x t + γ v x x + σ u 2 v + σ α u 2 u x + σ v 3 + σ α v 2 u x = 0 ,     Δ 2 v t α u x t + γ u x x + σ u 3 σ α u 2 v x + σ v 2 u σ α v 2 v x = 0 .
By taking:
U = u + I v , V = p + I q ,
the coupled FL Equation (2) are changed to:
v x t α v x x α β 2 ( v p + u q ) v x + ( α β 2 v q 2 α β + α β 2 u p ) u x + α β 2 v = 0 , u x t α u x x α β 2 ( v p + u q ) u x + ( α β 2 v q + 2 α β α β 2 u p ) v x + α β 2 u = 0 , q x t α q x x + α β 2 ( v p + u q ) q x + ( α β 2 v q + 2 α β α β 2 u p ) p x + α β 2 q = 0 , p x t α p x x + α β 2 ( v p + u q ) p x + ( α β 2 v q 2 α β + α β 2 u p ) q x + α β 2 p = 0 ,
where u , v ,   p and q are all real functions with respect to x and t . By the same transformation with Equation (2), the coupled FL Equation (3) can be transformed into:
p x t 2 p x x + ( v p u q ) u x ( q v + u p ) v x + ( 4 u 2 v 2 2 p 2 2 q 2 ) q x + 2 p = 0 , q x t + 2 q x x + ( v p + u q ) v x ( q v + u p ) u x + ( 4 u 2 v 2 2 p 2 2 q 2 ) p x 2 q = 0 , u x t 2 u x x + ( v p + u q ) p x ( q v + u p ) q x + ( 4 2 u 2 2 v 2 p 2 q 2 ) v x + 2 u = 0 , v x t + 2 v x x + ( v p u q ) q x ( q v + u p ) p x + ( 4 2 u 2 2 v 2 p 2 q 2 ) u x 2 v = 0 .
Next, we will seek the Lie symmetries of Equations (4)–(6) by the classical Lie symmetry method. Suppose the vector field of Equation (4) is:
V = ξ x + τ t + ϕ u + ψ v ,
where ξ , τ , ϕ and ψ are undetermined functions with respect to x , t , u and v . Equation (7) is also called a Lie symmetry of Equation (4).
By the procedure of the classical Lie symmetry method, Equation (7) should satisfy the following two conditions:
{ p r ( 2 ) V ( Δ 1 ) | Δ 1 = 0 , Δ 2 = 0 = 0 , p r ( 2 ) V ( Δ 2 ) | Δ 1 = 0 , Δ 2 = 0 = 0 ,
where Δ 1 = u t α v x t + γ v x x + σ ( u 2 + v 2 ) ( v + α u x ) ,     Δ 2 = v t α u x t + γ u x x + σ ( u 2 + v 2 ) ( u α v x ) ,       and p r ( 2 ) V denotes the second prolongation of V and:
p r ( 2 ) V = ϕ u + ψ v + ϕ x u x + ψ x v x + ϕ x x u x x + ϕ x t u x t + ψ x x v x x + ψ x t v x t ,
The above coefficient functions are given by:
ϕ x = D x ( ϕ ξ u x τ u t ) + ξ u x x + τ u x t ,         ϕ x x = D x x ( ϕ ξ u x τ u t ) + ξ u x x x + τ u t x x , ϕ x t = D x t ( ϕ ξ u x τ u t ) + ξ u x x t + τ u x t t ,     ψ x = D x ( ψ ξ v x τ v t ) + ξ v x x + τ v x t , ψ x x = D x x ( ψ ξ v x τ v t ) + ξ v x x x + τ v x x t ,   ψ x t = D x t ( ψ ξ v x τ v t ) + ξ v x x t + τ v x t t ,
Here, D x and D t are total differential operators. The exact solutions of Equation (8) can be found with the aid of Maple or Mathematica, and then we can obtain Lie symmetries for Equation (4) as follows:
V 1 = x ,                 V 2 = t ,             V 3 = v u u v ,                           V 4 = ( x 2 γ α t ) x + t t + ( 1 2 u + x v α ) u + ( 1 2 v x u α ) v .
From the definition of the Lie bracket, i.e., [ V i , V j ] = V i V j V j V i , the commutation relations of V 1 , V 2 , V 3 and V 4 are shown in the following:
[ V r , V s ] = 0 ,       r , s = 1 , 2 , 3                                       [ V r , V s ] = 0 ,       r , s = 3 , 4 [ V 1 , V 4 ] = [ V 4 , V 1 ] = V 1 + 1 α V 3 ,         [ V 2 , V 4 ] = [ V 4 , V 2 ] = V 2 2 γ α V 1 .
Therefore, V i   ( i = 1 , , 4 ) are closed under the Lie bracket, and they form a four-dimensional Lie algebra.
Similarly, we can gain the Lie symmetries of Equation (5):
V 1 = x ,           V 2 = t ,             V 3 = v u + u v + q p p q ,       V 4 = u u v v   + p p + q q , V 5 = ( x 2 α t ) x + t t + ( u 2 α β t v ) u + ( v + 2 α β t u ) v + 2 α β t q p 2 α β t p q .
The commutation relations of Equation (12) are listed in the following:
[ V r , V s ] = 0 ,       r , s = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4                             [ V k , V 5 ] = [ V 5 , V k ] = 0 ,       k = 3 , 4 , 5 [ V 1 , V 5 ] = [ V 5 , V 1 ] = V 1 ,                       [ V 2 , V 5 ] = [ V 5 , V 2 ] = 2 α V 1 + V 2 + 2 α β V 3 .
Therefore, V i   ( i = 1 , , 5 ) are closed under the Lie bracket, and they form a five- dimensional Lie algebra.
By a similar method as with the systems Equations (4) and (5), we can get the Lie symmetries of Equation (6):
V 1 = x ,         V 2 = t ,         V 3 = q p + p q ,     V 4 = v u + u v ,   V 5 = p u q v + u p + v q ,       V 6 = q u + p v   v p + u q , V 7 = ( x 4 t ) x + t t + ( 4 t v u 2 ) u + ( 4 t u v 2 ) v + ( 4 t q p 2 ) p + ( 4 t p q 2 ) q .
The commutation relations of Equation (13) are listed in the following:
[ V r , V s ] = 0 ,   r , s = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4                                             [ V k , V 5 ] = [ V 5 , V k ] = 0 ,   k = 1 , 2 , 5 , 7 [ V r , V 6 ] = [ V 6 , V r ] = 0 ,     r = 1 , 2 , 6 , 7         [ V s , V 7 ] = [ V 7 , V s ] = 0 ,     s = 3 , 4 , 7 [ V 1 , V 7 ] = [ V 7 , V 1 ] = V 1 ,                                           [ V 2 , V 6 ] = [ V 6 , V 2 ] = 4 V 1 + V 2 + 4 V 6 ,
[ V 3 , V 5 ] = [ V 5 , V 3 ] = V 6 ,                                   [ V 3 , V 6 ] = [ V 6 , V 3 ] = V 5 , [ V 4 , V 5 ] = [ V 5 , V 4 ] = V 6 ,                                         [ V 4 , V 6 ] = [ V 6 , V 4 ] = V 5 , [ V 5 , V 6 ] = [ V 6 , V 5 ] = 2 V 4 2 V 3 .
Therefore, V i ( i = 1 , 2 , , 7 ) are closed under the Lie bracket, and they form a seven-dimensional Lie algebra.

3. Conservation Laws of Equations (4)–(6) by the SA Method

3.1. Conservation Laws of Equation (4)

Based on the obtained Lie symmetries in Section 2, we can construct conservation laws for Equations (4)–(6) by the steps of the SA method [5,6].
From the definition of the Fréchet derivative and adjoint Fréchet derivative, one obtains the linearizing operator of Equation (4):
  L = [ ( 2 σ α u u x + 2 σ u v ) + σ α ( u 2 + v 2 ) D x + D t σ ( u 2 + 3 v 2 + 2 α v u x ) + γ D x x α D x t σ ( 3 u 2 + v 2 2 α u v x ) + γ D x x α D x t σ ( 2 u v 2 α v v x ) σ α ( u 2 + v 2 ) D x D t ]   ,
and the adjoint linearizing operator of Equation (4):
  L * = [ 2 σ ( u v α v v x ) σ α ( u 2 + v 2 ) D x D t σ ( 3 u 2 + v 2 2 α u v x ) + γ D x x α D x t σ ( u 2 + 3 v 2 + 2 α v u x ) + γ D x x α D x t 2 σ ( u v + α u u x ) + σ α ( u 2 + v 2 ) D x + D t ]   .
Using the Lie symmetries Equation (11), the symmetry components η ^ ρ of Equation (4) can be expressed by:
η ^ 1 = ( η ^ 1 1 , η ^ 2 1 ) = ( u x , v x ) ,       η ^ 2 = ( η ^ 1 2 , η ^ 2 2 ) = ( u t , v t ) ,         η ^ 3 = ( η ^ 1 3 , η ^ 2 3 ) = ( v , u ) , η ^ 4 = ( η ^ 1 4 , η ^ 2 4 ) = ( 1 2 u + x v α + ( x + 2 γ α t ) u x t u t , 1 2 v x u α + ( x + 2 γ α t ) v x t v t ) .
From Equation (15), one obtains the following adjoint linearizing system:
  L * ω σ = [ 2 σ ( u v α v v x ) σ α ( u 2 + v 2 ) D x D t σ ( 3 u 2 + v 2 2 α u v x ) + γ D x x α D x t σ ( u 2 + 3 v 2 + 2 α v u x ) + γ D x x α D x t 2 σ ( u v + α u u x ) + σ α ( u 2 + v 2 ) D x + D t ]   [ ω 1 ω 2 ]   = [ 0 0 ] ,
with ω 1 and ω 2 being functions dependent on x , t , u and v . After calculation, we find that the only solution to Equation (17) is:
( ω 1 , ω 2 ) = ( C u , C v ) ,
with C being a constant. This is the adjoint symmetry of Equations (4), and we take C = 1 in the following for simplicity.
Substituting η ^ 1 = ( η ^ 1 1 , η ^ 2 1 ) in Equation (16) and ( ω 1 , ω 2 ) in Equation (18) into the conservation laws identity of Theorem 1 in [6], one can obtain the following conservation laws of Equation (4) with respect to V 1 :
X 1 = σ α u u x ( u 2 + v 2 ) σ α v v x ( u 2 + v 2 ) + γ ( u x x v v x x u ) + α ( u x v t v x u t ) , T 1 = u u x v v x + α ( u v x x v u x x ) .
Using the other pairs η ^ i   ( i = 2 , 3 , 4 ) in Equation (16) and ( ω 1 , ω 2 ) in Equation (18), one can obtain the other three conservation laws of Equation (4):
X 2 = σ α u u t ( u 2 + v 2 ) σ α v v t ( u 2 + v 2 ) + γ ( u x t v v x t u ) + γ ( u x v t v x u t ) , T 2 = u u t v v t + α ( u v x t v u x t ) .
X 3 = α ( v v t + u u t ) ,             T 3 = α ( v v x + u u x ) .
X 4 = σ α x u v ( u x v + u v x ) + 2 σ γ t ( u 3 u x + v 3 v x ) σ α t u v ( u t v + u v t ) σ α 2 ( u 2 + v 2 ) 2 + γ t ( v x u t v t u x )                 x ( v v t + u u t ) + α x ( v x u t v t u x ) + γ x ( u v x x v u x x ) + γ t ( u x t v v x t u ) γ α ( u 2 + v 2 )                 + α 2 ( u v t v u t ) + σ α x ( u 3 u x + v 3 v x ) σ α t ( u 3 u t + v 3 v t ) + 2 γ 2 t α ( u v x x v u x x ) + 2 σ γ t u v ( u v x + v u x ) , T 4 = 1 2 ( u 2 + v 2 ) + ( 2 x + 2 γ t α ) ( u u x + v v x ) t ( u u t + v v t ) + α 2 ( v u x u v x )             + ( α x + 2 γ t ) ( v u x x u v x x ) + α t ( u v x t v u x t ) .
Remark 1.
Taking conservation laws Equation (19) as an example, we show that adjoint symmetries are also multipliers corresponding to conservation laws. After some calculation, Equation (19) will reduce to:
X ¯ 1 = γ ( u v x v u x ) + 1 4 σ α ( u 2 + v 2 ) 2 α u v t ,       T ¯ 1 = 1 2 ( u 2 + v 2 ) + α u x v .
and:
D x X ¯ 1 + D t T ¯ 1 = u Δ 1 + ( v ) Δ 2 = 0 .
Basedon the definition of multipliers [4], Equation (22) means that ( u , v ) is the multiplier corresponding to ( X 1 , T 1 ) . In fact, ( u , v ) are also multipliers corresponding to ( X 2 , T 2 ) ( X 3 , T 3 ) and ( X 4 , T 4 ) .
Remark 2.
As to the conservation law ( X 3 , T 3 ) , since D x X 3 + D t T 3 0 , it is not relevant to the solutions of Equation (4), and it is trivial. The other conservation laws ( X 1 , T 1 ) , ( X 2 , T 2 ) and ( X 4 , T 4 ) are nontrivial and can be proved. For example, D x X 2 + D t T 2 = u Δ 1 + v Δ 2 = 0 . The accuracy of the above conservation laws has been verified.

3.2. Conservation Laws of Equation (5)

From the definition of the Fréchet derivative and adjoint Fréchet derivative, one obtains the linearizing operator of Equation (5):
  L = [ α β 2 ( p u x q v x ) + α β ( β u p β v q 2 ) D x α β 2 ( p v x q u x + 1 ) α β 2 ( v p + u q ) D x α D x x + D x t α β 2 ( u u x v v x ) α β 2 ( v u x + u v x ) α β 2 ( p v x q u x + 1 ) α β 2 ( v p + u q ) D x α D x x + D x t α β 2 ( p u x q v x ) α β ( β u p β v q 2 ) D x α β 2 ( u v x + v u x ) α β 2 ( u u x v v x ) α β 2 ( p p x q q x ) α β 2 ( p q x + q p x ) α β 2 ( v q x u p x ) α β ( β u p β v q 2 ) D x α β 2 ( v p x + u q x + 1 ) + α β 2 ( v p + u q ) D x α D x x + D x t α β 2 ( p q x + q p x ) α β 2 ( p p x q q x ) α β 2 ( v p x + u q x + 1 ) + α β 2 ( v p + u q ) D x α D x x + D x t α β 2 ( v q x u p x ) + α β ( β u p β v q 2 ) D x ] ,
and the adjoint linearizing operator of Equation (5):
L * = [ α β 2 ( v q x u p x ) α β ( β u p β v q 2 ) D x α β 2 ( v p x + u q x + 1 ) + α β 2 ( v p + u q ) D x α D x x + D x t α β 2 ( p p x q q x ) α β 2 ( p q x + q p x ) α β 2 ( v p x + u q x + 1 ) + α β 2 ( v p + u q ) D x α D x x + D x t α β 2 ( v q x u p x ) + α β ( β u p β v q 2 ) D x α β 2 ( p q x + q p x ) α β 2 ( p p x q q x ) α β 2 ( u u x v v x ) α β 2 ( v u x + u v x ) α β 2 ( p u x q v x ) + α β ( β u p β v q 2 ) D x α β 2 ( p v x q u x + 1 ) α β 2 ( v p + u q ) D x α D x x + D x t α β 2 ( v u x + u v x ) α β 2 ( u u x v v x ) α β 2 ( p v x q u x + 1 ) α β 2 ( v p + u q ) D x α D x x + D x t α β 2 ( p u x q v x ) α β ( β u p β v q 2 ) D x ] .
By the symmetries Equation (12), there are five symmetry components of Equation (5), and they can be expressed by:
η ^ 1 = ( η ^ 1 1 , η ^ 2 1 , η ^ 3 1 , η ^ 4 1 ) = ( u x , v x , p x , q x ) ,     η ^ 2 = ( u t , v t , p t , q t ) ,     η ^ 3 = ( v , u , q , p ) ,     η ^ 4 = ( u , v , p , q ) ,   η ^ 5 = ( u 2 α β t v + ( x + 2 α t ) u x t u t , v + 2 α β t u + ( x + 2 α t ) v x t v t ,               2 α β t q + ( x + 2 α t ) u p x t p t , 2 α β t p + ( x + 2 α t ) q x t q t ) .
From Equation (23), one can obtain the adjoint linearizing system of Equation (5):
  L * ω σ = L * [ ω 1 ω 2 ω 3 ω 4 ]   = [ 0 0 0 0 ] ,
with ω i   ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) being functions dependent on x , t , u , v , p and q . After complicated calculations, we find that there are two solutions to Equation (25):
( ω 1 , ω 2 , ω 3 , ω 4 ) = C 1 ( p , q , u , v ) ,
and:
( ω 1 , ω 2 , ω 3 , ω 4 ) = C 2 ( q , p , v , u ) ,
where C 1 and C 2 are constants. They are adjoint symmetries of Equation (5). We take C 1 = 1 and C 2 = 1 in the following for simplicity.
Based on the symmetry component η ^ 1 = ( η ^ 1 1 , η ^ 2 1 , η ^ 3 1 , η ^ 4 1 ) in Equation (24) and the adjoint symmetry ( ω 1 , ω 2 , ω 3 , ω 4 ) in Equation (26), one can obtain conservation laws of Equation (5) with respect to V 1 through the conservation laws identity of Theorem 1 in [6] as follows:
X 1 = 2 α β 2 p q v u x + 2 α β p u x α β 2 u p 2 u x + α β 2 u q 2 u x + 2 α β 2 p q u v x + α β 2 v p 2 v x 2 α β q v x               α β 2 v q 2 v x + 2 α β u p x α β 2 u 2 p p x + 2 α β 2 u v q p x + α β 2 p v 2 p x + α β 2 q u 2 q x + 2 α β 2 u v p q x               α β 2 q v 2 q x 2 α β v q x + α q u x x + α p v x x α v p x x α u q x x + u x q t + v x p t p x v t q x u t , T 1 = u x x q v x x p + p x x v + q x x u .
Similarly, using the other symmetry components η ^ i     ( i = 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) in Equation (24) and the adjoint symmetry ( ω 1 , ω 2 , ω 3 , ω 4 ) in Equation (26), one can obtain other conservation laws of Equation (5) with respect to V i     ( i = 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) :
X 2 = 2 α β 2 p q v u t + 2 α β p u t α β 2 u p 2 u t + α β 2 u q 2 u t + 2 α β 2 p q u v t + α β 2 v p 2 v t 2 α β q v t α β 2 v q 2 v t + 2 α β u p t α β 2 u 2 p p t + 2 α β 2 u v q p t + α β 2 p v 2 p t + α β 2 q u 2 q t + 2 α β 2 u v p q t α β 2 q v 2 q t 2 α β v q t + α q u x t + α p v x t α v p x t α u q x t α u t q x α v t p x + α p t v x + α q t u x , T 2 = u x t q v x t p + p x t v + q x t u .
X 3 = v q t u p t + q v t p u t ,     T 3 = q v x + p u x v q x + u p x . X 4 = u q t + v p t + p v t + q u t ,     T 4 = q u x p v x v p x u q x . X 5 = ( α x q 2 α 2 t q ) u x x + ( α x p 2 α 2 t p ) v x x + ( α x v + 2 α 2 t v ) p x x + ( α x u + 2 α 2 t v ) u x x + α t q u x t + α t p v x t α t v p x t α t u q x t + ( 2 α β 2 x v p q 4 α 2 β 2 t v p q + α β 2 x u p 2 2 α β x p 4 α 2 β t p 2 α 2 β 2 t u q 2 + 2 α 2 β 2 t u p 2 α β 2 x u q 2 ) u x ( α t   + x ) q t u x + ( 2 α β 2 t v p q + α β 2 t u q 2 α β 2 t u p 2 ) u t + ( α t   + x ) q x u t ( α t   + x ) p t v x + ( 2 α β x q + 4 α 2 β t q 4 α 2 β 2 t u p q 2 α β 2 x u p q 2 α 2 β 2 t v p 2 + α β 2 x v q 2 α β 2 x v p 2 + 2 α 2 β 2 t v q 2 ) v x + ( 2 α β 2 t u p q α β 2 t v q 2 + α β 2 t v p 2 ) v t + ( α t   + x ) p x v t + ( 2 α β x u 4 α 2 β t u 2 α β 2 x u v q 4 α 2 β 2 t u v q + α β 2 x u 2 p α β 2 x v 2 p + 2 α 2 β 2 t u 2 p 2 α 2 β 2 t v 2 p ) p x + ( 2 α β 2 t u v q α β 2 t u 2 p + α β 2 t v 2 p + v ) p t + ( 4 α 2 β 2 t u v p 2 α β 2 x u v p α β 2 x u 2 q + α β 2 x v 2 q 2 α 2 β 2 t u 2 q + 2 α 2 β 2 t v 2 q + 2 α β x v + 4 α 2 β t v ) q x + ( 2 α β 2 t u v p + α β 2 t u 2 q α β 2 t v 2 q + u ) q t + 4 α β 2 u v p q + 2 α β u p α β 2 u 2 p 2 + α β 2 u 2 q 2 + α β 2 v 2 p 2 2 α β v q α β 2 v 2 q 2 , T 5 = ( 2 α t   + x ) q u x x + ( 2 α t   + x ) p v x x ( 2 α t   + x ) v p x x ( 2 α t   + x ) u q x x t q u x t t p v x t + t v p x t + t u q x t 2 α β t q v x + 2 α β t p u x + ( 2 α β t v u ) q x + ( 2 α β t u v ) p x .
It is pointed out that the conservation laws ( X 3 , T 3 ) and ( X 4 , T 4 ) are trivial, and the others are nontrivial. Since there are two adjoint symmetries for Equation (5), using the other pair Equation (24) and Equation (27), we can also obtain five other explicit conservation laws for Equation (5). For simplicity, we omit them here.

3.3. Conservation Laws of Equation (6)

From the definition of the Fréchet derivative, one obtains the linearizing operator of Equation (6):
  L = [ ( 2 u q x q u x p v x ) + ( p v q u ) D x ( q v x 2 v q x + p u x ) ( q v + p u ) D x v u x + 2 4 p q x u v x 2 D x x + D x t v v x u u x 4 q q x + ( H p 2 q 2 ) D x ( 2 u p x p u x + q v x ) ( q v + p u ) D x ( 2 v p x p v x q u x ) + ( q u p v ) D x u u x v v x 4 p p x + ( H p 2 q 2 ) D x u v x v u x 4 q p x 2 + 2 D x x D x t q p x p q x 4 u v x + 2 2 D x x + D x t q q x p p x 4 v v x + ( H u 2 v 2 ) D x ( u q x v p x 2 p v x ) + ( q u v p ) D x ( v q x + u p x 2 q v x ) ( q v + p u ) D x p p x q q x 4 u u x + ( H u 2 v 2 ) D x p q x q p x 4 v u x 2 + 2 D x x D x t ( v q x u p x 2 p u x ) ( q v + p u ) D x ( v p x u q x 2 q u x ) + ( v p u q ) D x ] ,
where H = 4 u 2 v 2 p 2 q 2 .
From the definition of the adjoint Fréchet derivative, the adjoint linearizing operator of Equation (6) is:
  L * = [ u q x 2 p v x p x v + ( p v + q u ) D x q x v u p x + 2 q v x + ( p u + q v ) D x 4 u v x p q x + 2 + q p x 2 D x x + D x t p p x + q q x + 4 v v x + ( G + u 2 + v 2 ) D x u p x q x v + 2 p u x + ( p u + q v ) D x 2 q u x p x v u q x + ( q u + p v ) D x p p x + 4 u u x + q q x + ( G + u 2 + v 2 ) D x p q x q p x 4 v u x 2 + 2 D x x D x t u v x + v u x + 2 4 p q x 2 D x x + D x t 4 q q x + u u x + v v x + ( G + p 2 + q 2 ) D x ( 2 u q x p v x u x q ) + ( v p u q ) D x ( p u x + v x q + 2 v q x ) + ( p u + q v ) D x v v x + u u x + 4 p p x + ( G + p 2 + q 2 ) D x x u v x v u x 4 q p x 2 + 2 D x x D x t 2 u p x v x q + p u x + ( q v + p u ) D x 2 v p x u x q p v x + ( p v + u q ) D x ] ,
where G = 4 + u 2 + v 2 + p 2 + q 2 .
Using the symmetries Equation (13), there are seven symmetry components of Equation (6), and they are given by:
η ^ 1 = ( η ^ 1 1 , η ^ 2 1 , η ^ 3 1 , η ^ 4 1 ) = ( u x , v x , p x , q x ) ,     η ^ 2 = ( u t , v t , p t , q t ) , η ^ 3 = ( 0 , 0 , q , p ) ,             η ^ 4 = ( v , u , 0 , 0 ) ,   η ^ 5 = ( p , q , u , v ) ,         η ^ 6 = ( q , p , v , u ) , η ^ 7 = ( 4 t v u 2 + ( x + 4 t ) u x t u t , 4 t u v 2 + ( x + 4 t ) v x t v t ,               4 t q p 2 + ( x + 4 t ) p x t p t , 4 t p q 2 + ( x + 4 t ) q x t q t ) .
From Equation (29), we know that the adjoint linearizing system is:
  L * ω σ = L * [ ω 1 ω 2 ω 3 ω 4 ]   = [ 0 0 0 0 ] ,
with ω i   ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) being functions dependent on x , t , u , v , p and q . After complicated calculations, we find four different solutions to Equation (31), and they are listed as follows:
( ω 1 , ω 2 , ω 3 , ω 4 ) = C 1 ( u , v , p , q ) ,
( ω 1 , ω 2 , ω 3 , ω 4 ) = C 2 ( q , p , 0 , 0 ) ,
( ω 1 , ω 2 , ω 3 , ω 4 ) = C 3 ( v , u , q , p ) ,
( ω 1 , ω 2 , ω 3 , ω 4 ) = C 4 ( 0 , 0 , v , u ) ,
where C i ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) are real numbers. They are all adjoint symmetries of Equation (6). Substituting η ^ i = ( η ^ 1 i , η ^ 2 i , η ^ 3 i , η ^ 4 i ) in Equation (30) and ( ω 1 , ω 2 , ω 3 , ω 4 ) in Equations (32)–(35) into the conservation laws identity of Theorem 1 in [6], one can obtain explicit conservation laws of Equation (6) for V i . For example, using Equations (30) and (33) ( C 2 = 1 ), we can obtain the following conservation laws:
X 1 = u u x ( p 2 + q 2 ) + v v x ( p 2 + q 2 ) + p x ( 4 p + 2 p 3 + 2 p q 2 + p u 2 + p v 2 )               + q x ( 4 q + 2 q 3 + 2 q p 2 + q u 2 + q v 2 ) + 2 q p x x 2 p q x x + p x q t q x p t , T 1 = q p x x + p q x x . X 2 = u u t ( p 2 + q 2 ) + v v t ( p 2 + q 2 ) + p t ( 4 p + 2 p 3 + 2 p q 2 + p u 2 + p v 2 )               + q t ( 4 q + 2 q 3 + 2 q p 2 + q u 2 + q v 2 ) + 2 q p x t 2 p q x t + 2 p x q t 2 q x p t , T 2 = q p x t + p q x t .
X 3 = q q t + p p t , T 3 = q q x p p x .
X 4 = 0 , T 4 = 0 .
X 5 = 2 q u x + 2 p v x + 2 u q x 2 v p x u q t + v p t u p q 2 u p 3 v q 3 v q p 2 +                 4 p u p u 3 p u v 2 + 4 q v v q u 2 q v 3 , T 5 = q u x p v x .
X 6 = 2 q v x + 2 p u x 2 u p x 2 v q x + u p t + v q t q 3 u q p 2 u + p q 2 v + p 3 v 4 p v                 + p u 2 v + p v 3 + 4 q u q u 3 q u v 2 , T 6 = q v x p u x .
X 7 = ( 8 t + 2 x ) ( p q x x q p x x ) + 2 q t p x t 2 p t q x t ( 4 t q 2 + 4 t p 2 + x q 2 + x p 2 ) ( u u x + v v x )                 + ( 8 t p 2 + 16 t 2 x p 2 + 4 x 8 t q 2 4 t u 2 4 t v 2 2 x q 2 x u 2 x v 2 ) ( p p x + q q x )                 + ( x + 2 t ) ( p t q x p x q t ) + t ( p 2 + q 2 ) ( u u t + v v t ) + ( 2 t p q 2 + t u 2 p + t v 2 p + 2 t p 3 q 2 ) p t                 + ( 2 t p 2 q + t u 2 q + t v 2 q + 2 t q 3 + p 2 ) q t + ( u 2 + v 2 ) ( p 2 + q 2 ) + ( p 2 + q 2 ) 2 2 p 2 2 q 2 , T 7 = ( 4 t + x ) p q x x + ( 4 t + x ) q q x x t q p x t + t p q x t ( 4 t q + p 2 ) q x + ( 4 t p + q 2 ) p x .
Here, ( X 3 , T 3 ) and ( X 4 , T 4 ) are trivial conservation laws, others are nontrivial.
Remark 3.
There are seven symmetry components of Equation (6), and they are expressed by Equation (30). Using Equation (30) and other adjoint symmetries in Equations (32)–(35), we can obtain twenty-one other conservation laws for Equation (6). The effectiveness of the SA method in seeking the conservation laws of multi-component coupled systems has been illustrated.

4. Conclusions and Discussions

Recently, the FL equation and coupled FL equations have attracted the interest of many researchers. They can be regarded as integrable analogs of the nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation and its coupled forms in the ultra-short regime. In this paper, Lie symmetry analyses for the FL equation and two coupled FL equations are performed, and we have shown that they all form a closed Lie algebra. Explicit conservation laws for the three FL equations have been obtained by the SA method. The correctness of the derived conservation laws has been tested by a mathematic software. The obtained conservation laws for the FL equation and coupled FL systems may be used to explain some practical physical problems.
The SA method and the multiplier method can both derive explicit conservation laws for PDEs, whether the PDEs have a Lagrangian or not. Taking the FL equation as an example, the relationships between the SA method and the multiplier method are further investigated. We conclude that the adjoint symmetry in the SA method is also the multiplier in the multiplier method. Using the multiplier method, every multiplier can only derive one conservation law. Using the SA method, any pair of symmetry and adjoint symmetry can derive one conservation law, so it can derive more conservation laws than the multiplier method. As illustrated in Section 3.2 and Section 3.3, it is very effective to search for the conservation laws of multi-component coupled systems by the SA method. However, when we seek conservation laws by the SA method, the adjoint symmetries cannot be zero. If the adjoint symmetry is zero, the obtained conservation law is trivial, and then we will have to use other methods.

Author Contributions

Methodology, writing—original draft preparation and funding acquisition, L.Z.; formal analysis, software, writing—review and editing, G.W.; validation and software, Q.Z.; resources, supervision and conceptualization, L.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 12105073), Science and Technology Program of Colleges and Universities in Hebei Province (grant number: QN2020144), Scientific Research and Development Program Fund Project of Hebei University of Economics and Business (grant numbers: 2020YB15, 2020YB12 and 2021ZD07), Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (grant number: A2018207030),Youth Key Program of Hebei University of Economics and Business (grant number: 2018QZ07), Key Program of Hebei University of Economics and Business (grant number: 2020ZD11) and Youth Team Support Program of Hebei University of Economics and Business.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely appreciate E. Buhe and X.P. Xin for their helpful discussions and valuable comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Olver, P.J. Application of Lie Groups to Differential Equations; Graduate Texts in Mathematics 107; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bluman, G.W.; Anco, S.C. Applications of Symmetry Methods to Partial Differential Equations; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Noether, E. Invariante Variations Probleme. Wiss. Göttingen Math.-Phys. Klasse 1918, 2, 235–257, English translation in Transport Theory and Statistical Physics, 1971, 1, 186–207. [Google Scholar]
  4. Naz, R. Conservation Laws for a Complexly Coupled KdV System, Coupled Burgers’ System and Drinfeld–Sokolov–Wilson System via Multiplier Approach. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2010, 15, 1177–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Eerdun, B.; Bluman, G.W.; Kara, A.H. Conservation Laws for Some Systems of Nonlinear PDEs via the Symmetry/Adjoint Symmetry Pair Method. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2016, 436, 94–103. [Google Scholar]
  6. Eerdun, B.; Bluman, G.W.; Chen, A.; Hu, Y.L. Some Approaches to the Calculation of Conservation Laws for a Telegraph System and Their Comparisons. Symmetry 2018, 10, 182. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ibragimov, N.H. A New Conservation Theorem. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 333, 311–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kara, A.H.; Mahomed, F.M. Noether-Type Symmetries and Conservation Laws via Partial Lagrangians. Nonlinear Dyn. 2006, 45, 367–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, L.H.; Xu, F.S.; Ma, L.X. Optimal System, Group Invariant Solutions and Conservation Laws of the CGKP Equation. Nonlinear Dyn. 2017, 88, 2503–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tian, Y.; Wang, K.L. Polynomial Characteristic Method an Easy Approach to Lie Symmetry. Therm. Sci. 2020, 24, 2629–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tian, Y.; Wang, K.L. Conservation Laws for Partial Differential Equations Based on the Polynomial Characteristic Method. Therm. Sci. 2020, 24, 2529–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bilman, D.; Buckingham, R.; Wang, D.S. Far-Field Asymptotics for Multiple-Pole Solitons in the Large-Order Limit. J. Differ. Equ. 2021, 297, 320–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ma, W.X. Conservation Laws of Discrete Evolution Equations by Symmetries and Adjoint Symmetries. Symmetry 2015, 7, 714–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Ding, Q.; Tian, S.F. On Differential Form Method to Find Lie Symmetries of Two Types of Toda Lattices. Rep. Math. Phys. 2014, 74, 323–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, H.J.; Wang, D.S.; Wang, S.K.; Wu, K.; Zhao, W.Z. On Geometric Approach to Lie Symmetries of Differential-Difference Equations. Phys. Lett. A 2008, 372, 5878–5882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tian, D.; Ain, Q.T.; Anjum, N.; He, C.H.; Cheng, B. Fractal N/MEMS: From Pull-In Instability to Pull-In Stability. Fractals 2021, 29, 2150030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tian, D.; He, C.H. A Fractal Micro-Electromechanical System and Its Pull-In Stability. J. Vib. Control. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. He, J.H.; El-Dib, Y.O.; Mady, A.A. Homotopy Perturbation Method for the Fractal Toda Oscillator. Fractal. Fract. 2021, 5, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. He, J.H.; He, C.H.; Saeed, T. A Fractal Modification of Chen-Lee-Liu Equation and Its Fractal Variational Principle. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2021, 35, 2150214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tian, D.; He, C.H.; He, J.H. Fractal Pull-In Stability Theory for Micro-electromechanical Systems. Front. Phys. 2021, 9, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fokas, A.S. On a Class of Physically Important Integrable Equations. Physica D 1995, 87, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lenells, J. Exactly Solvable Model for Nonlinear Pulse Propagation in Optical Fibers. Stud. Appl. Math. 2009, 123, 215–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lenells, J. Dressing for a Novel Integrable Generalization of the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation. J. Nonlinear Sci. 2010, 20, 709–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Vekslerchik, V.E. Lattice Representation and Dark Solitons of the Fokas–Lenells Equation. Nonlinearity 2011, 24, 1165–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Matsuno, Y. A Direct Method of Solution for the Fokas–Lenells Derivative Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation: I. Bright Soliton Solutions. J. Phys. A 2012, 45, 235202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Matsuno, Y. A Direct Method of Solution for the Fokas–Lenells Derivative Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation: II. Dark Soliton Solutions. J. Phys. A 2012, 45, 475202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Xu, J.; Fan, E.G. Long-Time Asymptotics for the Fokas–Lenells Equation with Decaying Initial Value Problem: Without Solitons. J. Differ. Equ. 2015, 259, 1098–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Triki, H.; Wazwaz, A.M. Combined Optical Solitary Waves of the Fokas–Lenells Equation. Wave. Random. Complex. 2017, 27, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Triki, H.; Wazwaz, A.M. New Types of Chirped Soliton Solutions for the Fokas–Lenells Equation. Int. J. Numer. Method H. 2017, 27, 1596–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lenells, J.; Fokas, A.S. On a Novel Integrable Generalization of the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation. Nonlinearity 2009, 22, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Geng, X.G.; Lv, X.Y. Darboux Transformation for an Integrable Generalization of the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation. Nonlinear Dyn. 2012, 69, 1621–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Feng, L.L.; Zhang, T.T. Breather Wave, Rogue Wave and Solitary Wave Solutions of a Coupled Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation. Appl. Math. Lett. 2018, 78, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. He, J.S.; Xu, S.W. Rogue Waves of the Fokas–Lenells Equation. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2012, 81, 124007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Xu, S.W.; He, J.S.; Cheng, Y.; Porseizan, K. The n-order Rogue Waves of Fokas–Lenells Equation. Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 2015, 38, 1106–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Ling, L.M.; Feng, B.F.; Zhu, Z.N. General Soliton Solutions to a Coupled Fokas–Lenells Equation. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 2018, 40, 185–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kang, Z.Z.; Xia, T.C.; Ma, X. Multi-Soliton Solutions for the Coupled Fokas–Lenells System via Riemann–Hilbert Approach. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2018, 35, 070201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.W.; Chow, K.W.; Wu, C.F. Solitons, Breathers and Rogue Waves for the Coupled Fokas–Lenells System via Darboux Transformation. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 2017, 33, 237–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, J.W.; Zhang, Y. Higher-Order Rogue Wave Solutions of a General Coupled Nonlinear Fokas–Lenells System. Nonlinear Dyn. 2018, 93, 585–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, L.; Wang, G.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, L. Lie Symmetries and Conservation Laws of Fokas–Lenells Equation and Two Coupled Fokas–Lenells Equations by the Symmetry/Adjoint Symmetry Pair Method. Symmetry 2022, 14, 238. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020238

AMA Style

Zhang L, Wang G, Zhao Q, Wang L. Lie Symmetries and Conservation Laws of Fokas–Lenells Equation and Two Coupled Fokas–Lenells Equations by the Symmetry/Adjoint Symmetry Pair Method. Symmetry. 2022; 14(2):238. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020238

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Lihua, Gangwei Wang, Qianqian Zhao, and Lingshu Wang. 2022. "Lie Symmetries and Conservation Laws of Fokas–Lenells Equation and Two Coupled Fokas–Lenells Equations by the Symmetry/Adjoint Symmetry Pair Method" Symmetry 14, no. 2: 238. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020238

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop