Abstract
We prove some finite sum identities involving reciprocals of the binomial and central binomial coefficients, as well as harmonic, Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, some of which recover previously known results, while the others are new.
Keywords:
binomial coefficient; central binomial coefficient; harmonic number; harmonic number sum; fibonacci numbers; lucas numbers; finite sum JEL Classification:
Primary 05A10; Secondary 05A19
1. Introduction
In the last hundred years or so, there has been an explosion of new results and applications of special functions in various areas of mathematics and related fields, such as engineering, quantum physics, astronomy and combinatorics. In this paper, we offer a study dealing with binomial, central binomial coefficients, and harmonic numbers that also include gamma and digamma functions and the classical Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. In 1981, Rockett [1] proved the following elegant identity: for any non-negative integer n,
In fact, as stated in [2], the history of this identity goes back to 1947. This identity is entry (2.25) in Gould’s collection [3], where a paper of Staver [4] is quoted. In 1997, Pla [5] rediscovered this identity and gave a different proof using generating functions. Triff [6] and Sury [7] provided new proofs of (1) using the gamma-beta integrals. Identity (1) has received great interest and motivated further combinatorial investigations. In 2002, Mansour [8] studied some finite sums involving reciprocal of the binomial coefficients and deduced a generalization of (1) together with many other results. He proved that
In the same paper, Mansour proved the following identity:
We note that this formula is not correct, and our Example 3 gives a correct form of this identity. Note that setting in (2) yields
In 2004, Sury et al. [9] rediscovered (4). In the literature, there exist many other finite sums involving the reciprocals of the binomial coefficients. As examples, we may recall
where with ; see [10], and
see ([11] Id. 12). We note that identity (5) has been recorded as an exercise in ([12] Ex. 53, p. 315). For many interesting finite sums related to inverses of the binomial and central binomial coefficients, we refer the interested readers to the important papers [9,13,14,15].
For and , a generalized harmonic number of order s is defined by
where are the familiar harmonic numbers. Throughout this paper, we let and . The special binomial coefficients are known as the central binomial coefficients. Let be the classical gamma function of Euler, and () be the digamma function. We may recall some basic properties of these important functions, which will be used extensively in this paper. The gamma function satisfies the reflection formula
see ([16] p. 253). Another important functional equation satisfied by the gamma function is the duplication formula
see ([16] p. 252). The binomial coefficients can be defined in terms of the gamma function and
We shall intensively use the following form of the binomial coefficients, which can be shown using the expressions (7)–(9).
The following simple but useful identities will be used intensively in our ongoing analysis:
The digamma function and harmonic numbers are related to
see ([17] p. 31), where is the Euler–Mascheroni constant. The digamma function satisfies a reflection formula and a duplication formula similar to that of the gamma function:
and
see ([17] p. 25). Using (13)–(15), we obtain, for ,
The Fibonacci sequence is given by , , and for , it satisfies the recursion relation . The Lucas sequence satisfies the same recursion relation with the initial values and , where . The Binet formulas for the Fibonacci numbers and Lucas numbers are given by
where and .
The aim of this paper is to generalize identity (4), and to prove formulas (20) and (21) noted below. Differentiating our formula with respect to s and x, and setting particular values for s and x, we discover many interesting identities involving the reciprocals of the binomial coefficients and harmonic numbers, as well as Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. Our results also contain identities (4) and (5) and some others as special cases. We continue with the following lemma, which plays a key role in the proofs of our main results.
2. Main Results
Lemma 1.
Let , , and . We define
Then, satisfies
Proof.
We, clearly, have
Hence,
Dividing both sides of this equation by x and then integrating over the interval and replacing , we obtain
By (11), this can be written as follows:
Letting in the sums on the left-hand side, and then dropping the prime, we obtain, after a short computation,
or
If we replace n by and take , we see that this is equivalent to (17). □
Setting in (19), and replacing n by , we obtain
Corollary 1.
Let , and . Then,
In particular, replacing s by here yields for and if
The main theorem now follows.
Theorem 1.
Let , , and . Then,
Proof.
We prove by mathematical induction. Clearly, (21) is true for . We assume that it is also true for n. So, by the inductive hypothesis and Lemma 1, we have
Simplifying this identity leads to
Some algebraic computations lead to
This can be simplified to
or
This reveals that (21) is valid for , and the proof is complete. □
Corollary 2.
Setting in (21), we obtain, for and ,
Corollary 4.
Setting in (21), we obtain, for and ,
3. Examples
Example 1.
Setting in (23), we obtain
Example 2.
Setting in (20) and replacing n by , we obtain
Summing the Equations (24) and (25) side by side and replacing n by , one obtains the following identity, which recovers (3).
Example 3.
For , we have
Example 4.
For , we have
Proof.
Example 5.
For , we have
where is the greatest integer function.
Proof.
Setting in (27), we obtain
An easy computation shows that
Thus, we have
The proof of (29) follows from
After some computations, we see that
Remark 1.
From (30), we conclude
and
Example 6.
For all with , and all non-negative integers n, we have
Proof.
Setting in (21), we obtain
Changing the index k to in the sums on the right-hand side yields the desired result. □
Remark 2.
Applying the operator to both sides of (34) enables us to find formulas for the family of sums
Example 7.
Setting in (34), we obtain
Example 8.
Setting in (34), we obtain
Example 9.
Setting in (34), we obtain
Example 10.
For all , which is not a negative integer, and , we have
Proof.
The proof follows from (20) by differentiating both sides with respect to □
Remark 3.
The odd harmonic numbers and the harmonic numbers are connected with . Therefore, Example 11 can be rewritten in the following elegant form:
This formula, it is acknowledged, is included in the preprint [18], sent as a private communication to the first author. Some other harmonic number identities may be seen in [19,20,21].
Example 12.
For all non-negative integers n, we have
Proof.
If we let in (36), we obtain
From the relation , it follows that
Using (25) and changing the index k to in the second sum, the conclusion follows. □
Remark 4.
Formula (37) corrects the corresponding identity in [22] (p. 2).
Example 13.
For all non-negative integers n, we have
Proof.
Now, the proof follows from (24). □
Example 14.
Setting in (20), we obtain, for all non-negative integers n
Remark 5.
Identity 14 is not new and can be found in ([14] Equation (1.6)).
Example 16.
Repeated differentiation of both sides of (20) with respect to s gives
Example 17.
Let . Then, we have
Proof.
The proof follows from (42) by setting , and using the relations and . □
Example 18.
Setting in (20), we obtain
Example 19.
Differentiating both sides of (21) with respect to x, and then setting , we obtain
In particular, for , the result is
Remark 6.
In [23,24], the authors considered the alternating finite sums
and they provided many properties of them involving closed form evaluations. If we apply the operator to both sides of (21) and set , we can obtain a formula for the sum:
Example 20.
Setting in (20), we obtain for
Example 21.
Setting in Corollary 2, for any non-negative integer n, we have
Example 22.
Setting in Corollary 2, for any non-negative integer n, we have
Example 23.
Let n be a non-negative integer. Then,
and
Proof.
Letting (and ) and replacing n by , we obtain
and
4. Concluding Remarks
We have considered a generalization of a finite sum with parameters and analyzed its numerous consequences in relation to the representation of new identities. We have featured some identities involving central binomial coefficients, harmonic numbers, and Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. It is envisaged that further work could be undertaken involving a study of Cauchy numbers, Apery’s constant, and other special numbers.
Author Contributions
Writing—original draft, N.B.; writing—review and editing, A.S. and N.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
No funding was sought or granted for this research.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
References
- Rockett, M.A. Sums of the inverses of binomial coefficients. Fib. Quart. 1981, 19, 433–445. [Google Scholar]
- Sprugnoli, R. Sums of reciprocals of the central binomial coefficients. Integers 2006, 6, #A27. [Google Scholar]
- Gould, H.W. Combinatorial Identities, revised edition; West Virginia University: Morgantown, WV, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
- Staver, T.B. Om summasjon av potenser av binomial koeffisienten. Nor. Mat. Tidsskr. 1947, 29, 97–103. [Google Scholar]
- Pla, J. The sum of inverses of binomial coefficients revisited. Fib. Quart. 1997, 35, 342–345. [Google Scholar]
- Trif, T. Combinatorial sums and series involving the inverses of binomial coefficients. Fib. Quart. 2000, 38, 79–84. [Google Scholar]
- Sury, B. Sum of the reciprocals of the binomial coefficients. Eur. J. Combin. 1993, 14, 351–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mansour, T. Combinatorial identities and inverse binomial coefficients. Adv. Appl. Math. 2002, 28, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sury, B.; Wang, T.; Zhao, F.Z. Some identities involving reciprocals of binomial coefficient. J. Integer Seq. 2004, 7, 3. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, H.T.; Du, D.K. Abel’s lemma and identities on harmonic numbers. Integers 2015, 15, 2. [Google Scholar]
- Batır, N. Combinatorial identities involving harmonic numbers. Integers 2020, 20, 2. [Google Scholar]
- Graham, R.L.; Knuth, D.E.; Patashnik, O. Concrete Mathematics, 2nd ed.; Addison-Wesley: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Belbachir, H.; Rahmani, M. Alternating sums of the reciprocals of binomial coefficients. J. Integer Seq. 2012, 15, 3. [Google Scholar]
- Witula, R. Finite sums connected with the inverses of central binomial numbers and Catalan numbers. Assian-Eur. J. Math. 2008, 1, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Witula, R.; Slota, D.; Watlak, J.; Chmielowska, A.; Rózański, M. Matrix methods in evaluation of integrals. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Mech. 2020, 19, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duren, P. Invitation to Classical Analysis; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Srivastava, H.M.; Choi, J. Zeta and q-Zeta Functions and Associated Series and Integrals; Elsevier: Waltham, MA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Campbell, J.M. Identities for finite sums involving central binomial coefficients and harmonic-type numbers. Unpublished work. 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Sofo, A. New classes of harmonic number identities. J. Integer Seq. 2012, 15, 12. [Google Scholar]
- Sofo, A.; Cvijović, D. Extensions of Euler harmonic sums. Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 2012, 6, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sofo, A. Shifted harmonic sums of order two. Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 2014, 29, 239–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Batır, N. Finite binomial sum identities with harmonic numbers. J. Integer Seq. 2021, 24, 3. [Google Scholar]
- Sprugnoli, R. Alternating weighted sums of inverse of binomial coefficients. J. Integer Seq. 2012, 15, 3. [Google Scholar]
- Belbachir, H.; Rahmani, M. Sury, Sums involving moments of reciprocals of binomial coefficients. J. Integer Seq. 2011, 14, 16. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).