Abstract
This paper considers commuting graphs over the semidihedral group . We compute their eigenvalues and obtain that these commuting graphs are not hyperenergetic for odd or even . We further compute the Laplacian spectrum, the Laplacian energy and the number of spanning trees of the commuting graphs over . We also discuss vertex connectivity, planarity, and minimum disconnecting sets of these graphs and prove that these commuting graphs are not Hamiltonian.
1. Introduction
The study of spectrum of commuting graphs of a given group or a ring attracted a large amount of attention in recent years. The concept of commuting graph has been defined in [1]. Let G be a group and X be a nonempty subset of G. The commuting graph has the vertex set X where are adjacent whenever in G. In the case that , we denote for short. Various aspects of commuting graphs of finite groups can be found in [2] and its references.
In this paper, we only consider finite simple graphs on vertex set , i.e., graphs without multiple-edges and loops on a finite vertex set. We use the following standard notation; see, e.g. [3,4]. We associate with a symmetric real matrix , called adjacency matrix, where if the vertex is adjacent to , and 0 otherwise. The characteristic polynomial of is . These eigenvalues with their multiplicity compose the spectrum of graph . Recall that the spectral radius of a matrix A, denoted by , is defined by .
Let denote the diagonal matrix of degrees of a graph . The Laplacian matrix of is the matrix , and the Laplacian spectrum of is a multiset given by L-spec where are the Laplacian eigenvalues of with multiplicities
The energy of the graph is defined as the sum of the absolute values of the eigenvalues of its adjacency matrix, that is, This concept was introduced in 1978 by Gutman [5]. Clearly, the energy of complete graph of order n is A graph is said to be hyperenergetic if and nonhyperenergetic if . It is known [6] (Theorem 5.24) that for almost all graphs , , which means that almost all graphs are hyperenergetic. Therefore, the problem of finding nonhyperenergetic graphs has been extremely meaningful, see [7]. Additionally, the Laplacian energy, denoted by is defined as where m is the number of edges in the graph Both the energy and the Laplacian energy of graphs play an important role in solving many physical and chemical problems. In theoretical chemistry, the energy of a given molecular (conjugated hydrocarbons) graph approximately describes the total electron energy of the molecule represented by that graph, see the comprehensive survey [6,8] for more details.
Let be a simple graph and u be a vertex. The neighbor set of u in , denoted by , is the set of all vertices adjacent to u. The degree of u is The minimum degree of is denoted by . A spanning tree of is a connected subgraph of on all vertices with edges, which is in fact a tree on . The number of spanning trees in a graph is denoted by .
A simple graph is said to be planar if it can be drawn on the plane with no crossing edges. The vertex-connectivity of is denoted by , which is the minimum number of vertices whose deletion will result in a disconnected graph or trivial graph. A set is called a disconnecting set if its deletion will increase the number of components of , and S is called a minimal disconnecting set if there is no proper subset of S that disconnects . For two vertex sets U and V, we denote by the set of edges having one end-point in U and the other in
Our focus in this paper lies on the semidihedral group
for . Moreover, all the elements of could be given as
From Lemma 10 of [9], we have for odd n, and for even
Remark 1.
If n is odd, then is the center of semidihedral group. Now, we suppose that , where and are the subsets of It is easy to check that for all However, when and If n is even, then is the center of semidihedral group. Similarly, we suppose that , where and are the subsets of It is also easy to find that for all However, if and
In the existing literature, there are still many gaps in finding characteristic polynomials, spectral radius, graph energy, Laplacian spectrum, vertex-connectivity, planarity, and Hamiltonian graphs of commuting graphs of finite semidihedral groups . We will address some of these problems in this paper. When n has a large number of factors, it is not easy to obtain explicit expression for the eigenvalues of the graph , so that we resort to bounding the spectral radius in such cases. Moreover, we prove that the commuting graph is not hyperenergetic when odd or even . In addition, we obtain the characteristic polynomial of the Laplacian matrix of , and we also derive the Laplacian spectrum of Moreover, we calculate the Laplacian energy and the number of spanning trees of Finally, we discuss vertex connectivity, planarity, and minimum disconnecting sets of commuting graphs of the semidihedral group and prove that these commuting graphs are not Hamiltonian.
2. Spectral Properties of Commuting Graphs
In the present section, we are going to find the characteristic polynomials of commuting graphs of semidihedral groups and discuss their spectral radius. Additionally, we also obtain the lower and upper bounds on the energy of the commute graph , and prove that is not hyperenergetic when odd or even .
Firstly, we can obtain the adjacency matrix of in the following. When n is odd, then to derive the adjacency matrix of a commuting graph , we first put the elements of then and finally respectively, and get the following matrix is
where
and
where and are of order .
When n is even, then we have Thus
where
Here, and are all of order .
Theorem 1.
For odd the characteristic polynomial of is
Proof.
By Theorem 2.2 of [10], we can get
Setting . By directed computation, Theorem 2.5 of [10] gives
where and . Therefore,
Applying a series of row and column operations, that is, for , subtracting the i-th row from the -th row, and subtracting the i-th column from the -th column yields to
where
and
For notational convenience, we denote
Next, we are going to compute the values of and . Since
Therefore
And then
After calculations, we can get
which together with yields the desired result. □
Corollary 1.
For odd the energy of is given below,
Consequently, the commuting graph with odd is not hyperenergetic.
Proof.
Corollary 2.
For odd the spectral radius of satisfies the following,
Proof.
It is clear from Proposition 1.3.9 of [11] that Let us divide the adjacency matrix into two parts, i.e. where are symmetric matrices of the form
By Theorem 1.3.15 of [11], we have
It is clear that is the adjacency matrix of together with number of isolated nodes. Therefore, . Hence, we get
This completes the proof. □
Theorem 2.
For even the characteristic polynomial of is
Proof.
By Theorem 2.2 of [10], we get
After some computations, we have , and the Theorem 2.4 of [10] gives
Then
Thus, we get
By subtracting the second row from the first row and subtracting the second column from the first column, we get
where
Directed calculation gives
and
We now conclude that
Hence, the required result immediately follows. □
Corollary 3.
For even the energy of satisfies the following,
Consequently, the commuting graph with even is not hyperenergetic.
Proof.
Corollary 4.
For even the spectral radius of satisfies the following,
Proof.
Similar to the proof of Theorem 2. □
3. Laplacian Spectral Properties of Commuting Graphs
In this section, we are going to find the Laplacian spectrum of commuting graphs on semidihedral groups, and then we compute the Laplacian energy and the number of spanning trees.
Firstly, we obtain the Laplacian matrix of when n is odd. Now we have For notational convenience, we define
and
where and F are of order . And then we denote
then the Laplacian matrix of is given as
Theorem 3.
For odd the characteristic polynomial of the Laplacian matrix of is
Proof.
By Theorem 2.2 of [10], we get
Upon calculation, we get from Theorem 2.5 of [10] that
where and . Hence,
Applying a series of row and column operations, that is, for , subtracting the i-th row from the -th row, and subtracting the i-th column from the -th column. Then
where
and
For notational convenience, we set
We now are ready to compute the values of and . Note that
Thus,
And then we have
Combining and , it follows that
which together with leads to the required result. □
As byproducts of Theorem 3, we obtain the following corollaries.
Corollary 5.
For odd the Laplacian spectrum of is
Corollary 6.
For odd the Laplacian energy of is
Corollary 7.
For odd , the number of spanning trees of is
Proof.
The proof is straightforward by using Corollary 5 and Proposition 1.3.4 of [12]. □
Finally, we are ready to compute the Laplacian spectrum of commuting graphs of when n is even, then we have . For notational convenience, we first define
Here, and Z are all of order . We then denote and
then
Theorem 4.
For even the characteristic polynomial of the Laplacian matrix of is
Proof.
By Theorem 2.2 of [10], we have
Upon computations, we get , and Theorem 2.4 of [10] yields
Then
where
and
It is not hard to find that
and
Therefore, we conclude that
This completes the proof. □
From Theorem 4, one could get the following corollaries similarly.
Corollary 8.
For even the Laplacian spectrum of is
Corollary 9.
For even the Laplacian energy of is
Corollary 10.
For even , the number of spanning trees of is
4. Connectivity and Planarity of Commuting Graphs
In this section, we show that these commuting graphs are not Hamiltonian. Furthermore, we discuss vertex connectivity, the planarity, and minimum disconnecting set of commuting graphs of semidihedral groups.
Theorem 5.
Suppose is a semidihedral group and is the commuting graph on , for . Then
- For odd
- For even
- is not Hamiltonian for both odd and even
Proof.
(1) For an odd integer n, since we know that the center of is adjacent to all other vertices of , so using Remark 1, we have the graph becomes disconnected into components by deletion of . Therefore,
(2) For an even integer since we know that the center of is adjacent to all other vertices of , so using Remark 1, the graph becomes disconnected into components by deletion of . Therefore,
(3) For an odd integer we have and the components of are Also, for an even integer n, we have and the components of are Therefore, by Proposition 7.2.3 of [13], we have is not Hamiltonian. □
Theorem 6.
Let be the commuting graph of the semidihedral group for . Then is nonplanar.
Proof.
Note that is cyclic subgroup of order . It suffices to show that the commuting graph is nonplanar if and only if the subgraph induced by is nonplanar. Since is cyclic, is nonplanar for . □
Theorem 7.
For odd we have . Moreover, for every we have , , , , , , and , , , are minimum disconnecting sets of
Proof.
Suppose so Now let the only vertices adjacent to v in are elements of and so . Hence, we conclude that .
It is clear from the structure of when n is odd, where . Since we have is the minimum disconnecting set of Similarly, we have , , , , and , , , are minimum disconnecting sets of □
Theorem 8.
For even we have . Moreover, for every we have and are minimum disconnecting sets of
Proof.
Similar to the proof of Theorem 7. □
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, T.C., W.L., F.E.-S., Y.L. and M.D.; investigation, W.L. and M.D.; data analysis, F.E.-S. and T.C.; writing the paper, M.D.; Y.L.; supervision, T.C., Y.L. and M.D.; project administration, M.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Weijun Liu was supported by NSFC (Grant Nos. 11871479, 12071484), Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2020JJ4675, 2018JJ2479) and Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences Project of CSU. Matthias Dehmer thanks the Austrian Science Foundadtion to support this work (P 30031).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Sample Availability
Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
References
- Bundy, D. The connectivity of commuting Graphs. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 2006, 113, 995–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Ali, F.; Li, Y. The connectivity and the spectral radius of commuting graphs on certain finite groups. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, T.; Feng, L.; Huang, H. Integral Cayley graphs over dicyclic group. Linear Algebra Appl. 2019, 566, 121–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, T.; Feng, L.; Liu, W. Directed Strongly Regular Cayley Graphs over Metacyclic Groups of Order 4n. Mathematics 2019, 7, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutman, I. The energy of a graph. Ber. Math. Stat. Sekt. Forschungszent. Graz. 1978, 103, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Shi, Y.; Gutman, I. Graph Energy; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Walikar, H.B.; Gutman, I.; Hampiholi, P.R.; Ramane, H.S. Non-hyperenergetic graphs. Graph Theory Notes N. Y. 2001, XLI, 14–16. [Google Scholar]
- Mohar, B. The Laplacian spectrum of graphs. In Graph Theory, Combinatorics and Applications, 2nd ed.; Alavi, Y., Chartrand, G., Oellermann, O.R., Schwenk, A.J., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1991; pp. 871–898. [Google Scholar]
- Harary, F. Graph Theory; Addision-Wesley Reading: Boston, MA, USA, 1969. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, F. Matrix Theory: Basic Results and Techniques, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Cvetković, D.; Rowlinson, P.; Simić, S. An Introduction to the Theory of Graph Spectra; Cambridge University Prese: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Brouwer, A.E.; Haemers, W.H. Spectra of Graphs; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- West, D.B. Introduction to Graph Theory; Prentice-Hall: New Delhi, India, 2003. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).