Abstract
In the present paper, we aim to prove a new lemma and quantum Simpson’s type inequalities for functions of two variables having convexity on co-ordinates over . Moreover, our deduction introduce new direction as well as validate the previous results.
1. Introduction
In mathematics, q–calculus, also known as Quantum calculus, is the study of calculus with no limits. In quantum calculus, we obtain q-analogues of mathematical objects that can be recaptured as . This concept was given by Euler who introduced q in infinite series and further defined in detail by Newton. Later on, Jackson [1] proposed the notation of q–definite integrals and extended the concept of q–calculus. Diverse fields of q–calculus have plentiful applications in orthogonal polynomials, number theory, information technology, quantum mechanics and relativity theory. Profound work of quantum calculus and theory of inequalities is addressed in [2,3,4] and the references cited therein. The idea of q–derivatives over the finite interval is introduced by Tariboon et al. [5,6] and discussed numerous problems on quantum analogues like q–Hölder inequality, q–Ostrowski inequality, q–Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, q–Grüss–Čhebyšev inequality, q–Grüss inequality and other integral inequalities.
Noor et al. [7,8], Sudsutad et al. [9] and Zhuang et al. [10] used q-differentiable convex functions as well as quasi-convex functions to investigate integral inequalities in different ways and their results are helpful in estimation of the right-hand side of quantum analogue of Hermite–Hadamard inequality.
Inequalities and theory of convex functions have a great dependency on each other. This relationship is the main sanity behind the vast literature published using convex functions. The Hermite–Hadamard inequalities have been studied extensively over the past three decades. The Hermite–Hadamard inequalities provide a necessary and sufficient conditions for a continuous function to be convex on , where with . These inequalities are stated as follows:
The following inequality is recognized as Simpson’s inequality:
Let be a four times continuously differentiable mapping on the interval and . Then, the following inequality holds:
A number of results on Simpson’s type inequalities have been proved by many researchers. For more details—see [11,12,13,14].
Tunç et al. first proposed Simpson type quantum integral inequalities for the function of one variable based on convexity—see [15].
Lemma 1.
Letting be a continuous function and . If is an integrable function on (the interior of V), then the following inequality holds:
where
Preliminaries of Hermite–Hadamard type inequality for co-ordinated convex functions on a rectangle from the plane are addressed by Dragomir—see [16].
The foundation of Simpson’s type inequality for co-ordinated convex functions is laid by Özdemir et al.—see [17].
Lemma 2.
Let be a partial differentiable mapping on . If , then the following equality holds:
where
and
The main result from [17] is stated in the theorem below.
Theorem 1.
Let be a second order partially differentiable function on Δ. If is a convex function on the co-ordinates on Δ, then the given inequality holds:
where
2. Preliminaries
For attaining our main aim, we recall some previously known concepts and basic results on q–calculus. The concept of q-calculus in single variable was given by Tariboon et al. [5,6]
Definition 1.
Let be a continuous function and let . Then, the q–derivative of h on V at s with is defined as
It is obvious that
A function h is q-differentiable on V; then, exists for all . Moreover, if we take in (4), then , where is well-known q–derivative of , which is defined by
In addition, we shall define higher-order q-derivatives of functions on V.
Definition 2.
Let be a continuous function and be a constant, denoted by (provided that is q-differentiable on V), which is the function from defined by
Similarly, provided that is q-differentiable on V for some integer , the -order q-derivative of h on Vis the function from defined by
Definition 3.
Let be a continuous function and be a constant. Then, the q–integral on V is defined by
for .
Note that, if we take in (5), then we obtain the concept of classical q–integral of function as
Theorem 2.
Let be a continuous function and be a constant; then, we have the following
Theorem 3.
Letting be a continuous function, and and be a constant, then we have the following:
Latif et al. [18] evolve quantum integral inequalities theory for functions of two variables and introduced q–Hermite–Hadamard type inequality of functions of two variables over finite rectangles. It is easy to discern that the preliminaries in Latif et al. [18] contain the preliminaries in Tariboon et al. [5] as a special case when h is a function of a single variable.
Definition 4.
Let be a continuous function of two variables and be constants. Then, partial -derivative, -derivative and -derivative at are, respectively, characterized by expressions as:
The function is called partially - - and -differentiable on if , and exist for all
Similarly, we can define partial derivatives of higher order.
Definition 5.
Let be a continuous function of two variables and be constants. Then, the definite -integral on are delineated as:
for .
Theorem 4.
Let be a continuous function. Then,
Theorem 5.
Let be continuous functions and . Then, for
Theorem 6.
(Hölder inequality for double sums). Suppose and be sequences of real (or complex) numbers and , the following inequality for double sums holds:
where all the sums are assumed to be finite.
Theorem 7.
(–Hölder inequality for functions of two variables). Let g and h be functions defined on and be constants. If with , the following inequality for –Hölder inequality for functions of two variables holds:
For more detail see [15].
Lemma 3.
Let be a constant. Then, hold
The main objective of this paper is to formulate lemmas and derive some quantum analogues of Simpson’s type inequalities of functions of two variables over finite rectangles by taking under consideration the theory quantum calculus of functions of two variables.
Moreover, we also provide some quantum estimates for Simpson’s type inequalities of functions of two variables using convexity on co-ordinates of the absolute value of the -partial derivatives.
3. Main Results
Lemma 4.
Let be a mixed partial -differentiable function over (the interior of Δ). Moreover, if mixed partial -derivative is continuous and integrable over for , then the following equality holds:
where
and
Proof.
Now, we consider
By the definition of partial -derivatives and definite -integrals, we have
We can calculate the value of the remaining three integrals in the same way as shown above, respectively, and adding them together to get the following result:
Multiplying both sides of (10) by , we get the desired result. □
Theorem 8.
Let be a mixed partially -differentiable mapping over (the interior of Δ). Moreover, if mixed partially –derivative is continuous and integrable over for and is convex on co-ordinates over , then the given inequality holds:
where
Proof.
Taking the absolute value on both sides of the equality of Lemma 4 and convexity of on co-ordinates over , then we have
Computing the integral on the right-hand side of the above inequality, we have
Utilizing Lemma 3,
After simplification, we get
We obtain
By a similar argument for the above integral, we have
Again utilizing Lemma 3, we get
We obtain our desired result. □
Remark 1.
Letting and in Theorem 8, then Theorem 8 converts into Theorem 3 proved in [17].
Theorem 9.
Let be a mixed partially -differentiable mapping over (the interior of Δ). Moreover, if mixed partially -derivative is continuous and integrable over for and is convex on co-ordinates over for with , then the given inequality holds:
where A is defined in Theorem 8.
Proof.
Taking the absolute value on both sides of the equality of Lemma 4, using the –Hölder inequality for functions of two variables inequality and convexity of on co-ordinates over , then we have
Utilizing Lemma 3, we obtain
Utilizing the -integral and -integral, we get
Finally,
which is our expected result. □
Theorem 10.
Let be a mixed partially -differentiable mapping over (the interior of Δ). Moreover, if mixed partially -derivative is continuous and integrable over for and is convex on co-ordinates over for , then the given inequality holds:
where A is defined in Theorem 8.
Proof.
Taking the absolute value on both sides of the equality of Lemma 4, using the –Hölder inequality for functions of two variables inequality and convexity of on co-ordinates over , then we have
Utilizing Lemma 3, we observe that
Using the values of the above -integrals, we get the desired inequality. □
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, H.K. and M.A.L.; writing—original draft preparation, H.K.; writing—review and editing, M.A.L. and S.H.; supervision, J.W.
Funding
This research work has been carried out at the School of Mathematical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Acknowledgments
The Chinese Government should be acknowledged for providing a full scholarship for Ph.D. studies to Humaira Kalsoom.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Jackson, F.H. On a q–definite integrals. Q. J. Pure Appl. Math. 1910, 4, 193–203. [Google Scholar]
- Ernst, T. A Comprehensive Treatment of q–Calculus; Springer Basel AG: Basel, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Gauchman, H. Integral inequalities in q–calculus. Comput. Math. Appl. 2004, 47, 281–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kac, V.; Cheung, P. Quantum Calculus; Springer Nature: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K. Quantum integral inequalities on finite intervals. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014, 121, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K. Quantum calculus on finite intervals and applications to impulsive difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013, 282, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noor, M.A.; Noor, K.I.; Awan, M.U. Some quantum estimates for Hermite–Hadamard inequalities. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 251, 675–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noor, M.A.; Noor, K.I.; Awan, M.U. Some quantum integral inequalities via preinvex functions. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 269, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sudsutad, W.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Tariboon, J. Quantum integral inequalities for convex functions. J. Math. Inequal. 2015, 9, 781–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, H.; Liu, W.; Park, J. Some quantum estimates of Hermite-Hadmard inequalities for quasi-convex functions. Miskolc Math. Notes 2016, 17, 649–664. [Google Scholar]
- Alomari, M.; Darus, M.; Dragomir, S.S. New inequalities of Simpson’s type for s-convex functions with applications. RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. 2009, 12, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Dragomir, S.S.; Agarwal, R.P.; Cerone, P. On Simpson’s inequality and applications. J. Inequal. Appl. 2000, 5, 533–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hudzik, H.; Maligranda, L. Some remarks on s-convex functions. Aequ. Math. 1994, 48, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarikaya, M.Z.; Set, E.; Özdemir, M.E. On new inequalities of Simpson’s type for convex functions. Comput. Math. Appl. 2016, 60, 2191–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tunç, M.; Gov, E.; Balgecti, S. Simpson type quantum integral inequalities for convex functions. Miskolc Math. Notes 2018, 19, 649–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dragomir, S.S. On the Hadamard’s inequality for functions on the co-ordinates in a rectangle from the plane. Taiwan J. Math. 2001, 5, 775–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Özdemir, M.E.; Akdemir, A.O.; Kavurmaci, H.; Avci, M. On the Simpson’s inequality for coordinated convex functions. arXiv 2010, arXiv:1101.0075. [Google Scholar]
- Latif, M.A.; Dragomir, S.S.; Momoniat, E. Some q–analogues of Hermite–Hadamard inequality of functions of two variables on finite rectangles in the plane. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2017, 29, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).