Next Article in Journal
Design and Application of Fuzzy Logic Based Fire Monitoring and Warning Systems for Smart Buildings
Next Article in Special Issue
Some Fixed-Point Theorems in b-Dislocated Metric Space and Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Neutrosophic Triplet Non-Associative Semihypergroups with Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bochner-Like Transform and Stepanov Almost Periodicity on Time Scales with Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Some Inequalities of Čebyšev Type for Conformable k-Fractional Integral Operators

1
Institute of Mathematics, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454010, China
2
College of Mathematics, Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, Tongliao 028043, China
3
School of Mathematical Sciences, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China
4
Department of Mathematical Science, Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences, Quetta, Pakistan
5
Department of Mathematics, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung 82444, Taiwan
6
Department of Mathematics, College of Arts and Science at Wadi Al Dawaser, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Wadi Al Dawaser 11991, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2018, 10(11), 614; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10110614
Submission received: 24 October 2018 / Revised: 1 November 2018 / Accepted: 6 November 2018 / Published: 8 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fixed Point Theory and Fractional Calculus with Applications)

Abstract

:
In the article, the authors present several inequalities of the Čebyšev type for conformable k-fractional integral operators.

1. Introduction

The Čebyšev inequality [1] reads that
1 b a a b f ( x ) g ( x ) d x 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x 1 b a a b g ( x ) d x ,
where f and g are two integrable and synchronous functions on [ a , b ] and two functions f and g are called synchronous on [ a , b ] if
[ f ( x ) f ( y ) ] [ g ( x ) g ( y ) ] 0 , x , y [ a , b ] .
The inequality (1) has many applications in diverse research subjects such as numerical quadrature, transform theory, probability, existence of solutions of differential equations, and statistical problems (see ([2], Chapter IX) and the paper [3]). Many authors have investigated, generalized, and applied the Čebyšev inequality (1). For detailed information, please refer to [4,5] and closely related references.
In [6,7], the Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals I a + α and I b α of order α > 0 are defined respectively by
I a + α f ( x ) = 1 Γ ( α ) a x ( x t ) α 1 f ( t ) d t , x > a , ( α ) > 0
and
I b α f ( x ) = 1 Γ ( α ) x b ( t x ) α 1 f ( t ) d t , x < b , ( α ) > 0 ,
where Γ is the classical Euler gamma function [8,9,10].
In [11], Belarbi and Dahmani presented the following theorems related to the Čebyšev inequality (1) for the Riemann–Liouville fractional integral operators [12,13,14].
Theorem 1
([11], Theorem 3.1). Let f and g be two synchronous functions on [ 0 , ) . Then, for t , α > 0 , we have
J α ( f g ) Γ ( α + 1 ) t α J α f ( t ) J α g ( t ) .
Theorem 2
([11], Theorem 3.2). Let f and g be two synchronous functions on [ 0 , ) . Then, for all t , α , β > 0 , we have
t α Γ ( α + 1 ) J β ( f g ) ( t ) + t β Γ ( β + 1 ) J α ( f g ) ( t ) J α f ( t ) J β g ( t ) + J β f ( t ) J α g ( t ) .
Theorem 3
([11], Theorem 3.3). Let f i for 1 i n be n positive and increasing functions on [ 0 , ) . Then, for t , α > 0 , we have
J α i = 1 n f i ( t ) [ J α ( 1 ) ] 1 n i = 1 n J α f i ( t ) .
Theorem 4
([11], Theorem 3.4). Let f and g be two functions defined on [ 0 , ) , such that f is increasing, g is differentiable, and there exists a real number m = inf t 0 g ( t ) . Then, the inequality
J α ( f g ) ( t ) 1 J α ( 1 ) J α f ( t ) J α g ( t ) m t α + 1 J α f ( t ) + m J α ( t f ( t ) )
is valid for t , α > 0 .
In [15], the Riemann–Liouville k-fractional integrals are respectively defined by
I k , a + α f ( x ) = 1 k Γ k ( α ) a x ( x t ) α / k 1 f ( t ) d t , x > a , ( α ) > 0
and
I k , b α f ( x ) = 1 k Γ k ( α ) x b ( t x ) α / k 1 f ( t ) d t , x < b , ( α ) > 0 ,
where Γ k is the gamma k-function [16,17].
In [18], the left and right sided fractional conformable integral operators are respectively defined by
β I a + α f ( x ) = 1 Γ ( β ) a x ( x a ) α ( τ a ) α α β 1 f ( τ ) ( τ a ) 1 α d τ
and
β I b α f ( x ) = 1 Γ ( β ) a x ( b x ) α ( b τ ) α α β 1 f ( τ ) ( b τ ) 1 α d τ ,
where ( β ) > 0 . Obviously, if taking a = 0 and α = 1 , then the Equations (4) and (5) reduce to the Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals (2) and (3), respectively.
In [19], one sided conformable fractional integral operator was defined as
β I α f ( x ) = 1 Γ ( β ) 0 x x α τ α α β 1 f ( τ ) τ 1 α d τ .
Recently, conformable k-fractional integrals were defined [20] by
k β I a + α f ( x ) = 1 k Γ k ( β ) a x ( x a ) α ( τ a ) α α β / k 1 f ( τ ) ( τ a ) 1 α d τ
and
k β I b α f ( x ) = 1 k Γ k ( β ) a x ( b x ) α ( b τ ) α α β / k 1 f ( τ ) ( b τ ) 1 α d τ ,
where ( β ) > 0 .
In this paper, we introduce the conformable k-fractional integral operator
β I k α f ( x ) = 1 k Γ k ( β ) 0 x x α τ α α β / k 1 f ( τ ) τ 1 α d τ .
When k = 1 , the Equations (7) to (8) reduces to the Equations (4) to (6), respectively.

2. Main Results

In this section, we present several Čebyšev type inequalities for conformable k-fractional integral operators defined in the Equation (8).
Theorem 5.
Let f and g be two integrable functions which are synchronous on [ 0 , ) . Then,
β J k α f g ( x ) Γ k ( β + k ) α β / k x α β / k β J k α f ( x ) β J k α g ( x ) ,
where α , β > 0 .
Proof. 
Since f and g are synchronous on [ 0 , ) , we have
f ( u ) g ( u ) + f ( v ) g ( v ) f ( u ) g ( v ) + f ( v ) g ( u ) .
Multiplying both sides of the Equation (9) by
1 k Γ k ( β ) u 1 α x α u α α β / k 1 , x R , 0 < u < x
results in
1 k Γ k ( β ) u 1 α x α u α α β / k 1 f ( u ) g ( u ) + 1 k Γ k ( β ) u 1 α x α u α α β / k 1 f ( v ) g ( v ) 1 k Γ k ( β ) u 1 α x α u α α β / k 1 f ( u ) g ( v ) + 1 k Γ k ( β ) u 1 α x α u α α β / k 1 f ( v ) g ( u ) .
Further integrating both sides with respect to u over ( 0 , x ) gives
1 k Γ k ( β ) 0 x x α u α α β / k 1 f ( u ) g ( u ) u 1 α d u + 1 k Γ k ( β ) 0 x x α u α α β / k 1 f ( v ) g ( v ) u 1 α d u 1 k Γ k ( β ) 0 x x α u α α β / k 1 f ( u ) g ( v ) u 1 α d u + 1 k Γ k ( β ) 0 x x α u α α β / k 1 f ( v ) g ( u ) u 1 α d u .
Consequently, it follows that
β J k α f g ( x ) + f ( v ) g ( v ) 1 k Γ k ( β ) 0 x x α u α α β / k 1 d u u 1 α g ( v ) β J k α f ( x ) + f ( v ) β J k α g ( x )
and
β J k α f g ( x ) + x α β / k Γ k ( β + k ) α β / k f ( v ) g ( v ) g ( v ) β J k α f ( x ) + f ( v ) β J k α g ( x ) ,
where
0 x x α u α α β / k 1 d u u 1 α = k x α β / k β α β / k .
Multiplying both sides of the Equation (10) by
1 k Γ k ( β ) v 1 α x α v α α β / k 1
arrives at
β J k α f g ( x ) k Γ k ( β ) v 1 α x α v α α β / k 1 + f ( v ) g ( v ) k Γ k ( β ) v 1 α x α v α α β / k 1 x α β / k Γ k ( β + k ) α β / k g ( v ) β J k α f ( x ) k Γ k ( β ) v 1 α x α v α α β / k 1 + f ( v ) β J k α g ( x ) k Γ k ( β ) v 1 α x α v α α β / k 1 .
Now, integrating over ( 0 , x ) reveals
β J k α f g ( x ) 1 k Γ k ( β ) 0 x x α v α α β / k 1 d v v 1 α + x α β / k Γ k ( β + k ) α β / k 1 k Γ k ( β ) 0 x x α v α α β / k 1 f ( v ) g ( v ) v 1 α d v β J k α f ( x ) 1 k Γ k ( β ) 0 x x α v α α β / k 1 g ( v ) v 1 α d v + β J k α g ( x ) 1 k Γ k ( β ) 0 x x α v α α β / k 1 f ( v ) v 1 α d v .
Therefore, we have
x α β / k Γ k ( β + k ) α β / k β J k α f g ( x ) + x α β / k Γ k ( β + k ) α β / k β J k α f g ( x ) β J k α f ( x ) β J k α g ( x ) + β J k α f ( x ) β J k α g ( x ) .
The proof of Theorem 5 is complete. □
Corollary 1.
Let f and g be two integrable functions which are synchronous on [ 0 , ) . Then,
β J k f g ( x ) Γ k ( β + k ) x β / k β J k f ( x ) β J k g ( x ) , α , β > 0 .
Proof. 
This follows from taking α = 1 in Theorem 5. □
Theorem 6.
Let f and g be two integrable functions which are synchronous on [ 0 , ) . Then,
x α τ / k Γ k ( τ + k ) α τ / k β J k α f g ( x ) + x α β / k Γ k ( β + k ) α β / k τ J k α f g ( x ) β J k α f ( x ) τ J k α g ( x ) + τ J k α f ( x ) β J k α g ( x )
for α , β , τ > 0 .
Proof. 
Multiplying both sides of the equality (10) by
1 k Γ k ( τ ) v 1 α x α v α α τ / k 1
yields
1 k Γ k ( τ ) v 1 α x α v α α τ / k 1 β J k α f g ( x ) + f ( v ) g ( v ) k Γ k ( τ ) v 1 α x α v α α τ / k 1 x α β / k Γ k ( β + k ) α β / k 1 k Γ k ( τ ) v 1 α x α v α α τ / k 1 g ( v ) β J k α f ( x ) + 1 k Γ k ( τ ) v 1 α x α v α α τ / k 1 f ( v ) β J k α g ( x ) .
Further integrating both sides with respect to v over ( 0 , x ) leads to
β J k α f g ( x ) k Γ k ( τ ) 0 x x α v α α τ / k 1 d v v 1 α + x α β / k Γ k ( β + k ) α β / k 1 k Γ k ( τ ) 0 x x α v α α τ / k 1 f ( v ) g ( v ) v 1 α d v β J k α f ( x ) k Γ k ( τ ) 0 x x α v α α τ / k 1 g ( v ) v 1 α d v + β J k α g ( x ) k Γ k ( τ ) 0 x x α v α α τ / k 1 f ( v ) v 1 α d v .
Therefore, we have
x α τ / k Γ k ( τ + k ) α τ / k β J k α f g ( x ) + x α β / k Γ k ( β + k ) α β / k τ J k α f g ( x ) β J k α f ( x ) τ J k α g ( x ) + τ J k α f ( x ) β J k α g ( x ) .
Further integrating with respect to v over ( 0 , x ) , as did in the proof of Theorem 5, concludes Theorem 6. □
Remark 1.
Applying Theorem 6 to τ = β results in Theorem 5.
Corollary 2.
Let f and g be two integrable functions which are synchronoms on [ 0 , ) . Then
x τ / k Γ k ( τ + k ) β J k f g ( x ) + x β / k Γ k ( β + k ) τ J k f g ( x ) β J k f ( x ) τ J k g ( x ) + τ J k f ( x ) β J k g ( x )
for α , β , τ > 0 .
Proof. 
This follows from taking α = 1 in Theorem 6. □
Theorem 7.
Let f i for 1 i n be positive and increasing functions on [ a , b ] . For α , β > 0 , we have
β J k α i = 1 n f i ( x ) Γ k ( β + k ) α β / k x α β / k n 1 i = 1 n β J k α f i ( x ) .
Proof. 
We prove this theorem by induction on n N . Obviously, the case n = 1 of (11) holds.
For n = 2 , since f 1 and f 2 are increasing, we have
[ f 1 ( x ) f 1 ( y ) ] [ f 2 ( x ) f 2 ( y ) ] 0 .
Now, the left proof of the inequality (11) for n = 2 is the same as that of Theorem 5.
Assume that the inequality (11) is true for some n 3 . We observe that, since f i is increasing, f = i = 1 n f i is increasing. Let g = f n + 1 . Then, applying the case n = 2 to the functions f and g yields
β J k α i = 1 n f i f n + 1 ( x ) Γ k ( β + k ) α β / k x α β / k β J k α i = 1 n f i β J k α f n + 1 ( x ) Γ k ( β + k ) α β / k x α β / k n i = 1 n + 1 β J k α f i ( x ) ,
where the induction hypothesis for n is used in the deduction of the second inequality. The proof of Theorem 7 is complete. □
Corollary 3.
Let f i for 1 i n be positive and increasing functions on [ a , b ] . For α , β > 0 , we have
β J k i = 1 n f i ( x ) Γ k ( β + k ) x β / k n 1 i = 1 n β J k f i ( x ) .
Proof. 
This follows from taking α = 1 in Theorem 7. □
Theorem 8.
Let α , β > 0 and the functions f , g : [ 0 , ) R be such that f is increasing, g is differentiable, and g has a lower bound m = inf t [ 0 , ) g ( t ) . Then,
β J k α f g ( x ) Γ k ( β + k ) α β / k x α β / k β J k α f ( x ) β J k α g ( x ) k m x ( β + k ) β J k α f ( x ) + m β J k α i f ( x ) ,
where i ( x ) is the identity function.
Proof. 
Let h ( x ) = g ( x ) m x . We find that h is differentiable and increasing on [ 0 , ) . As in the proof of Theorem 7, for clarity, let p ( x ) = m x , we obtain
β J k α f ( g p ) ( x ) Γ k ( β + k ) α β / k x α β / k β J k α f ( x ) β J k α ( g p ) ( x ) = Γ k ( β + k ) α β / k x α β / k β J k α f ( x ) β J k α g ( x ) Γ k ( β + k ) α β / k x α β / k β J k α f ( x ) β J k α p ( x ) ,
where
β J k α f ( g p ) ( x ) = β J k α f g ( x ) m β J k α i f ( x )
and
β J k α p ( x ) = m x α β / k + 1 Γ k ( 2 k ) Γ k ( β + 2 k ) α β / k .
Since Γ k ( k ) = 1 , see ([16], p. 183), then Γ k ( 2 k ) = k . Therefore, we derive
β J k α p ( x ) = k m x α β / k + 1 Γ k ( β + 2 k ) α β / k .
Substituting the Equations (13) and (14) into the Equation (12) leads to the desired result. □
Corollary 4.
Under conditions of Theorem 8, we have
β J k f g ( x ) Γ k ( β + k ) x β / k β J k f ( x ) β J k g ( x ) k m x ( β + k ) β J k f ( x ) + m β J k i f ( x ) ,
where i ( x ) is the identity function.
Proof. 
This follows from taking α = 1 in Theorem 8. □

3. Conclusions

In this paper, we established several Čebyšev type inequalities for conformable k-fractional integral operators. We observed that, if allowing k = 1 , inequalities obtained in this paper will reduce to those inequalities in [21]. Similarly, if letting α = k = 1 , inequalities obtained in this paper will reduce to those inequalities in [11].

Author Contributions

The authors contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The fourth author was supported by Grant No. MOST 107-2115-M-017-004-MY2 of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the anonymous referees for their careful corrections to and valuable comments on the original version of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Čebyšev, P.L. Sur les expressions approximatives des intégrales définies par les autres prises entre les mêmes limites. Proc. Math. Soc. Charkov 1882, 2, 93–98. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mitrinović, D.S.; Pečarić, J.E.; Fink, A.M. Classical and New Inequalities in Analysis; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  3. Qi, F.; Cui, L.-H.; Xu, S.-L. Some inequalities constructed by Tchebysheff’s integral inequality. Math. Inequal. Appl. 1999, 2, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Özdemir, M.E.; Set, E.; Akdemir, A.O.; Sarıkaya, M.Z. Some new Chebyshev type inequalities for functions whose derivatives belongs to Lp spaces. Afr. Mat. 2015, 26, 1609–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Set, E.; Dahmani, Z.; Mumcu, I. New extensions of Chebyshev type inequalities using generalized Katugampola integrals via Pólya-Szegö inequality. Int. J. Optim. Control. Theor. Appl. IJOCTA 2018, 8, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kilbas, A.A. Hadamard-type fractional calculus. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2001, 38, 1191–1204. [Google Scholar]
  7. Samko, S.G.; Kilbas, A.A.; Marichev, O.I. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications; Edited and with a Foreword by S. M. Nikol’skiĭ; Translated from the 1987 Russian Original; Revised by the Authors; Gordon and Breach Science Publishers: Yverdon, Switzerland, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  8. Nisar, K.S.; Qi, F.; Rahman, G.; Mubeen, S.; Arshad, M. Some inequalities involving the extended gamma function and the Kummer confluent hypergeometric k-function. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018, 2018, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Qi, F.; Guo, B.-N. Integral representations and complete monotonicity of remainders of the Binet and Stirling formulas for the gamma function. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Math. RACSAM 2017, 111, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Srivastava, H.M.; Choi, J. Zeta and q-Zeta Functions and Associated Series and Integrals; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  11. Belarbi, S.; Dahmani, Z. On some new fractional integral inequalities. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2009, 10, 86. [Google Scholar]
  12. Shi, D.-P.; Xi, B.-Y.; Qi, F. Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for (m,h1,h2)-convex functions via Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals. Turkish J. Anal. Number Theory 2014, 2, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shi, D.-P.; Xi, B.-Y.; Qi, F. Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals of (α,m)-convex functions. Fract. Differ. Calc. 2014, 4, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, S.-H.; Qi, F. Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for s-convex functions via Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 2017, 22, 1124–1134. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mubeen, S.; Habibullah, G.M. k-fractional integrals and application. Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci. 2012, 7, 89–94. [Google Scholar]
  16. Díaz, R.; Pariguan, E. On hypergeometric function and Pochhammer k-symbol. Divulg. Mat. 2007, 15, 179–192. [Google Scholar]
  17. Qi, F.; Akkurt, A.; Yildirim, H. Catalan numbers, k-gamma and k-beta functions, and parametric integrals. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 2018, 25, 1036–1042. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jarad, F.; Uğurlu, E.; Abdeljawad, T.; Băleanu, D. On a new class of fractional operators. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2017, 2017, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Set, E.; Mumcu, İ.; Özdemir, M.E. Grüss Type Inequalities Involving New Conformable Fractional Integral Operators. ResearchGate Preprint. 2018. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323545750 (accessed on 8 October 2018).
  20. Habib, S.; Mubeen, S.; Naeem, M.N.; Qi, F. Generalized k-Fractional Conformable Integrals and Related Inequalities. HAL Archives. 2018. Available online: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01788916 (accessed on 8 October 2018).
  21. Set, E.; Mumcu, İ.; Demirbaş, S. Chebyshev Type Inequalities Involving New Conformable Fractional Integral Operators. ResearchGate Preprint. 2018. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323880498 (accessed on 8 October 2018).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qi, F.; Rahman, G.; Hussain, S.M.; Du, W.-S.; Nisar, K.S. Some Inequalities of Čebyšev Type for Conformable k-Fractional Integral Operators. Symmetry 2018, 10, 614. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10110614

AMA Style

Qi F, Rahman G, Hussain SM, Du W-S, Nisar KS. Some Inequalities of Čebyšev Type for Conformable k-Fractional Integral Operators. Symmetry. 2018; 10(11):614. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10110614

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qi, Feng, Gauhar Rahman, Sardar Muhammad Hussain, Wei-Shih Du, and Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar. 2018. "Some Inequalities of Čebyšev Type for Conformable k-Fractional Integral Operators" Symmetry 10, no. 11: 614. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10110614

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop