Next Article in Journal
Special Issue: Landscape Urbanism and Green Infrastructure
Previous Article in Journal
Legitimacy Dilemmas in Direct Government Intervention: The Case of Public Land Development, an Example from the Netherlands
Open AccessArticle

Operationalizing Vulnerability: Land System Dynamics in a Transfrontier Conservation Area

Department of Geography and Geosciences, University of Louisville, 213 Lutz Hall, Louisville, KY 40292, USA
Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of North Carolina Wilmington, 601 S College Rd., Wilmington, NC 28403, USA
Environmental Studies Program, University of Colorado Boulder, 4001 Discovery Dr., Boulder, CO 80303, USA
Independent Research Consultant, P.O. Box 233, Maun, Ngamiland District 00000, Botswana
Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, 1480 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1480, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2019, 8(7), 111;
Received: 16 May 2019 / Revised: 9 July 2019 / Accepted: 11 July 2019 / Published: 16 July 2019
Understanding how individuals, communities, and populations vary in their vulnerability requires defining and identifying vulnerability with respect to a condition, and then developing robust methods to reliably measure vulnerability. In this study, we illustrate how a conceptual model translated via simulation can guide the real-world implementation of data collection and measurement of a model system. We present a generalizable statistical framework that specifies linkages among interacting social and biophysical components in complex landscapes to examine vulnerability. We use the simulated data to present a case study in which households are vulnerable to conditions of land function, which we define as the provision of goods and services from the surrounding environment. We use an example of a transboundary region of Southern Africa and apply a set of hypothesized, simulated data to illustrate how one might use the framework to assess vulnerability based on empirical data. We define vulnerability as the predisposition of being adversely affected by environmental variation and its impacts on land uses and their outcomes as exposure (E), mediated by sensitivity (S), and mitigated by adaptive capacity (AC). We argue that these are latent, or hidden, characteristics that can be measured through a set of observable indicators. Those indicators and the linkages between latent variables require model specification prior to data collection, critical for applying the type of modeling framework presented. We discuss the strength and directional pathways between land function and vulnerability components, and assess their implications for identifying potential leverage points within the system for the benefit of future policy and management decisions. View Full-Text
Keywords: adaptive capacity; drylands; land use; livelihoods; Southern Africa; structural equation model adaptive capacity; drylands; land use; livelihoods; Southern Africa; structural equation model
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Gaughan, A.E.; Stevens, F.R.; Pricope, N.G.; Hartter, J.; Cassidy, L.; Salerno, J. Operationalizing Vulnerability: Land System Dynamics in a Transfrontier Conservation Area. Land 2019, 8, 111.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop