Next Article in Journal
The Cypriot Extra-Urban Sanctuary as a Central Place: the Case of Agia Irini
Previous Article in Journal
Context and Opportunities for Expanding Protected Areas in Canada
Open AccessArticle

Forest Carbon Gain and Loss in Protected Areas of Uganda: Implications to Carbon Benefits of Conservation

Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Høgskoleveien 8, 1431 Ås, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2018, 7(4), 138; https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040138
Received: 26 September 2018 / Revised: 1 November 2018 / Accepted: 13 November 2018 / Published: 16 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Land-Use Change and Ecosystem Carbon Dynamics)
Uganda designated 16% of its land as Protected Area (PA). The original goal was natural resources, habitat and biodiversity conservation. However, PAs also offer great potential for carbon conservation in the context of climate change mitigation. Drawing on a wall-to-wall map of forest carbon change for the entire Uganda, that was developed using two Digital Elevation Model (DEM) datasets for the period 2000–2012, we (1) quantified forest carbon gain and loss within 713 PAs and their external buffer zones, (2) tested variations in forest carbon change among management categories, and (3) evaluated the effectiveness of PAs and the prevalence of local leakage in terms of forest carbon. The net annual forest carbon gain in PAs of Uganda was 0.22 ± 1.36 t/ha, but a significant proportion (63%) of the PAs exhibited a net carbon loss. Further, carbon gain and loss varied significantly among management categories. About 37% of the PAs were “effective”, i.e., gained or at least maintained forest carbon during the period. Nevertheless, carbon losses in the external buffer zones of those effective PAs significantly contrast with carbon gains inside of the PA boundaries, providing evidence of leakage and thus, isolation. The combined carbon losses inside the boundaries of a large number of PAs, together with leakage in external buffer zones suggest that PAs, regardless of the management categories, are threatened by deforestation and forest degradation. If Uganda will have to benefit from carbon conservation from its large number of PAs through climate change mitigation mechanisms such as REDD+, there is an urgent need to look into some of the current PA management approaches, and design protection strategies that account for the surrounding landscapes and communities outside of the PAs. View Full-Text
Keywords: carbon change; leakage; Uganda; Protected Areas carbon change; leakage; Uganda; Protected Areas
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Gizachew, B.; Solberg, S.; Puliti, S. Forest Carbon Gain and Loss in Protected Areas of Uganda: Implications to Carbon Benefits of Conservation. Land 2018, 7, 138.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop