Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Spatial Drivers of Land Use and Land Cover Change in the Protected and Communal Areas of the Zambezi Region, Namibia
Previous Article in Journal
Navigating Multiple Tensions for Engaged Praxis in a Complex Social-Ecological System
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Land 2018, 7(4), 130; https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040130

Institutional Functionality in Participatory Integrated Watershed Development of Tana Sub-Basin, Ethiopia

1
College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Dilla University, P.O. Box 419, Dilla, Ethiopia
2
Water and Land Resource Center, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 3880, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
3
Institute of Technology, Haramaya University, P.O. Box 138, Haramaya, Ethiopia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 13 October 2018 / Revised: 29 October 2018 / Accepted: 2 November 2018 / Published: 6 November 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [852 KB, uploaded 6 November 2018]   |  
  |   Review Reports

Abstract

Sustaining watersheds that were developed through community mobilization are a major challenge in Ethiopia despite significant efforts to promote soil and water conservation technologies and approaches. This paper investigates the hypothesis that institutional rationality and functionality play an important role in developing enduring watersheds by comparing the good performing Model research watersheds and adjacent watersheds developed through extensively promoted community mobilization. A semi-qualitative research method was used by applying a multi-stage purposive sampling technique for selecting sample respondents. Based on the new institutional economic theory, twelve effective institutional indicators were devised for the evaluation. Questionnaires were designed and tested to solicit respondents’ perceptions on these indicators. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. The results showed that significant differences were observed between the two watershed groups in relation to good interaction (p = 0.03) and technical rationality (p = 0.04). Most of the institutional characteristics and rationalities that led to better performance in the case of the Model research watershed were lacking in the community watersheds. In the Model watersheds, effective institutional characteristics and rationalities contributed to enhanced natural resource conservation, increased incomes, improved household food security, and provided additional social benefits. The most important lesson is that close follow-up and informed engagement leads to a speedy recovery and the sustainability of Community watersheds from implementing modest re-orientation of the existing institutional arrangements. View Full-Text
Keywords: watershed; institutional setup and functionality; community mobilization; rationality; sustainability; Tana Basin; Ethiopia watershed; institutional setup and functionality; community mobilization; rationality; sustainability; Tana Basin; Ethiopia
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Tesfaye, G.; Alamirew, T.; Kebede, A.; Zeleke, G. Institutional Functionality in Participatory Integrated Watershed Development of Tana Sub-Basin, Ethiopia. Land 2018, 7, 130.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Land EISSN 2073-445X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top