Next Article in Journal
Institutional Functionality in Participatory Integrated Watershed Development of Tana Sub-Basin, Ethiopia
Previous Article in Journal
Farmers’ Perceptions of Agricultural Land Abandonment in Rural Western New York State
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Land 2018, 7(4), 129; https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040129

Navigating Multiple Tensions for Engaged Praxis in a Complex Social-Ecological System

1
Environmental Learning Research Centre, Department of Education, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 94, Makhanda (Grahamstown) 6140, South Africa
2
Institute for Water Research, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 94, Makhanda (Grahamstown) 6140, South Africa
3
Tsitsa Project, Department of Environmental Science, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 94, Makhanda (Grahamstown) 6140, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 18 September 2018 / Revised: 19 October 2018 / Accepted: 20 October 2018 / Published: 6 November 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [2616 KB, uploaded 6 November 2018]   |  

Abstract

Innovative, pragmatic approaches are needed to support sustainable livelihoods and landscape management in complex social-ecological systems (CSES) such as river catchments. In the Tsitsa River Catchment, South Africa, researchers and natural resource managers have come together to apply such innovative approaches. Since CSES are characterised by uncertainty and surprise, understanding and managing them requires a commitment to reflexive praxis and transdisciplinarity. Accordingly, we facilitated a collective reflection and learning process in the project team to deepen our understanding of praxis in CSES. Our findings indicate that CSES thinking created an enabling framing. However, building new linkages among diverse actors to put CSES thinking into practice is challenging, since it requires the development of novel working relationships. Existing institutional structures, power dynamics, and ways of working impose significant constraints. A deeper critical realist analysis of our findings revealed a metaphor which explains why this work is challenging. In this metaphor, the Tsitsa Project team is navigating a bumpy terrain of dialectic tensions. These are tensions for example between natural science and social science, and between science and indigenous knowledge. Based on this metaphor, we suggest an expanding role for scientists and managers, and recommend transformative social learning processes to support teams navigating such bumpy terrains. View Full-Text
Keywords: governance; strategic adaptive management; sustainable landscape management; sustainable rural livelihoods; transdisciplinarity governance; strategic adaptive management; sustainable landscape management; sustainable rural livelihoods; transdisciplinarity
Figures

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Cockburn, J.; Palmer, C.T.G.; Biggs, H.; Rosenberg, E. Navigating Multiple Tensions for Engaged Praxis in a Complex Social-Ecological System. Land 2018, 7, 129.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Land EISSN 2073-445X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top