A Landscape Design Approach for Coastal Cycling Infrastructure Design: The Case Study of the Kallithea–Glyfada Seafront of Athens, Greece
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Method
3. Results
3.1. General Design Principles
- Attractiveness: Highlight landscape views and sensory experiences (e.g., sight, sound, smell, touch) and create points of interest that encourage interaction with the environment and other activities (e.g., bike parking near coastal recreation) [8].
- Adaptability: Design the infrastructure to be flexible and capable of evolving over time in response to future changes, thereby enhancing the capacity of the system to preserve stability through adaptive responses to both endogenous dynamics and exogenous influences [34].
- Connectivity: Link the route with other cycling networks to allow access to varied landscapes, destinations, and recreational opportunities.
3.2. Elements Based on Lynch’s Theory
- Paths: These were divided into primary and secondary roads. The only route considered as a primary path is Poseidonos Avenue, as it is the largest and most significant road in the study area and largely dictates the alignment of the cycling route. Secondary paths include other major roads that cross or border the study area.
- Natural Edges: Defined as the coastline and streams or small rivers. The coastline serves as the most prominent natural boundary, physically demarcating one side of the route (the other being defined by the avenue). Notable streams also function as natural boundaries and, in some cases, as administrative borders between municipalities.
- Nodes: Categorized into two types: those that attract people year-round (e.g., beaches) and those that attract crowds during summer months (e.g., squares and pedestrian streets). This classification was deemed essential for identifying existing or potential needs for infrastructure and activity planning.
- Districts: These were divided into areas of general interest—such as parks and city centers—and those with distinctive characteristics, particularly areas undergoing urban regeneration or redevelopment projects. For these areas, general references were made without detailing specific design proposals.
- Landmarks: Defined as locations of particular interest or symbolic importance within a neighborhood, including statues, monuments, and major churches, which serve as visual and cultural reference points.
3.3. Landscape Types
3.4. Design Proposals for Each Landscape Type
- Type 1
- Type 2
- Type 3
- Type 4
- Type 5
3.5. Proposals for the Entire Route
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gehl, J. Cities for People; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Bedimo-Rung, A.L.; Mowen, A.J.; Cohen, D.A. The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2005, 28 (Suppl. S2), 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hartig, T.; Mitchell, R.; de Vries, S.; Frumkin, H. Nature and Health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2014, 35, 207–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zijlema, W.L.; Palencia, I.A.; Triguero-Mas, M.; Gidlow, C.; Maas, J.; Kruize, H.; Andrusaityte, S.; Grazuleviciene, R.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. Active commuting through natural environments is associated with better mental health: Results from the PHENOTYPE project. Environ. Int. 2018, 121 Pt 1, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nawrath, M.; Kowarik, I.; Fischer, L.K. The influence of green streets on cycling behavior in European cities. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2019, 190, 103598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Black, P.; Street, E. The power of perceptions: Exploring the role of urban design in cycling behaviours and healthy ageing. Transp. Res. Procedia 2014, 4, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owen, N.; Humpel, N.; Leslie, E.; Bauman, A.; Sallis, J.F. Understanding environmental influences on walking; Review and research agenda. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2004, 27, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Conti, A.; Ruggeri, D.; Bartolomei, L. Soft infrastructure as landscape—A methodology for the assessment and improvement of the user experience of soft mobility. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 14, 2396–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Commission of the European Communities. Cycling: The Way Ahead for Towns and Cities. Available online: https://www.openbook.gr/i-poli-paei-mprosta-me-to-podilato (accessed on 1 June 2025). (In Greek).
- Hull, A.; O’Holleran, C. Bicycle infrastructure: Can good design encourage cycling? Urban Plan. Transp. Res. 2014, 2, 369–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, G.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Wesemael, P. Conceptualizing cycling experience in urban design research: A systematic literature review. Appl. Mobilities 2018, 6, 92–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vlastos, T.; Milakis, D.; Athanasopoulos, K. Bicycle in 17 Greek Cities; ΥΠΕΠΘ/ΟΕΔΒ: Athens, Greece, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Lynch, K. The Image of the City; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1960. [Google Scholar]
- Cullen, G. The Concise Townscape; Architectural Press: Oxford, UK, 1961. [Google Scholar]
- Stephens, A. Improving the Aesthetic and Other Experiential Design Aspects of Bicycle Paths in Western Australia. Master’s Thesis, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia, 2010. Available online: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/874 (accessed on 4 June 2025). (In English).
- Klaveren, R. Naturally Steering Towards a Landscape Approach on Cycling Infrastructure. Master’s Thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 2023. Available online: https://theses.ubn.ru.nl/items/446e8294-5a87-46c5-bd69-cbfd55af1a23/full (accessed on 30 May 2025). (In English).
- Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R.; Paydar, M.; Ardeshiri, A. Recreational cycling in a coastal city: Investigating lifestyle, attitudes and built environment in cycling behavior. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 39, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.; Moudon, A.V. Neighbourhood design and physical activity. Build. Res. Inf. 2008, 36, 395–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Wang, W.; Liu, P.; Ragland, D.R. Physical environments influencing bicyclists’ perception of comfort on separated and on-street bicycle facilities. Transp. Res. Part D-Transp. Environ. 2012, 17, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fleming, S. Cycle Space: Architecture & Urban Design in the Age of the Bicycle; nai010 publishers: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Russell, J.A. A circumplex model of affect. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1980, 39, 1161–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafer, E.L.; Hamilton, J.F.; Schmidt, E.A. Natural landscape preferences: A predictive model. J. Leis. Res. 1969, 1, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beatley, T. Biophilic Cities: Integrating Nature into Urban Design and Planning. Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Mostafavi, M.; Doherty, G. Ecological Urbanism; Lars Muller Publishers: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Newell, R.; Dale, A.; Lister, N.-M. An integrated climate-biodiversity framework to improve planning and pol-icy: An application to wildlife crossings and landscape connectivity. Ecol. Soc. 2022, 27, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehta, V. The Street: A Quintessential Social Public Space; Routledge: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Available online: https://www.are.admin.ch/are/en/home/media/publications/sustainable-development/brundtland-report.html (accessed on 2 June 2025). (In English).
- Hellenic Statistical Authority. Available online: https://www.statistics.gr/en/home (accessed on 4 June 2025).
- Jones, P. Sensory indiscipline and affect: A study of commuter cycling. Soc. Cult. Geogr. 2012, 13, 645–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jungnickel, K.; Aldred, R. Cycling’s Sensory Strategies: How Cyclists Mediate their Exposure to the Urban Environment. Mobilities 2014, 9, 238–255. [Google Scholar]
- Van Duppen, J.; Spierings, B. Retracing trajectories: The embodied experience of cycling, urban sensescapes and the commute between ‘neighbourhood’ and ‘city’ in Utrecht, NL. J. Transp. Geogr. 2013, 30, 234–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, R.; Te Brommelstroet, M.; Nikolaeva, A. Cycling subjective experience: A conceptual framework and methods review. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2024, 101, 142–159. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/transportation-research-part-f-traffic-psychology-and-behaviour/vol/101/suppl/C (accessed on 25 May 2025). (In English). [CrossRef]
- Vlastos, T.; Birbili, T. Creating Bicycle-Friendly Cities. Elements of Aesthetics and Construction—The First Examples in Greece and Cyprus; E.U. Directorate-General for Environment, Development Agency of the Municipality of Athens, Regulatory Plan and Environmental Protection Organization of Athens: Athens, Greece, 2011. (In Greek) [Google Scholar]
- Folke, C.; Carpenter, S.R.; Walker, B.; Scheffer, M.; Chapin, T.; Rockström, J. Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karter, O.; Groenendijk, L. Onderzoek Reistijdbeleving Fietsers. Goudappel Cofeng. Available online: https://www.goudappel.nl/sites/default/files/2022-02/onderzoek-reistijdbeleving-fietsers.pdf (accessed on 3 May 2025). (In English).
- Van Hagen, M. Waiting Experience at Train Stations. Doctoral Dissertation. Available online: https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/6066520/thesis_M_van_Hagen.pdf (accessed on 2 May 2024). (In English).
- Swanwick, C. Landscape Character Assessment: Guidance for England and Scotland; Natural England and Scottish Natural Heritage: York, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
Title 1 | Infrastructure | Context | View | Noise | Safety | Vegetation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type 1 (Orange) | Sidewalk adjacent to a low-traffic road | Located near recreational areas and marinas | Open view of the sea; limited visual connection with the urban fabric, yet continuous visual exposure to the road | Moderate | Moderate risk level | Predominantly Mediterranean and adequately maintained |
Type 2 (Purple) | Pedestrian street with recreational and green spaces | Panoramic sea views; no visual connection to either the urban fabric or the roadway | Low | Low risk level | Mainly Mediterranean with moderate maintenance | |
Type 3 (Blue) | Protected sidewalk, attracting people primarily during summer months | Open or partially limited sea view; continuous visual contact with both the urban environment and a high-speed road | Moderate | Moderate risk level | Very well maintained, featuring both tropical and Mediterranean species | |
Type 4 (Yellow) | Sidewalk exposed to a high-speed road; partially protected secondary corridor in a construction zone | Closed sea view; strong visual exposure to both the built environment and roadway | High | High risk level | Sparse and unmanaged, with little to no maintenance | |
Type 5 (Green) | Existing bike path, popular especially during the summer | Includes marinas and green recreational spaces | Open view toward the sea; limited visual connection to the built environment and nearby low-traffic roads | Low | Low risk level | Very well maintained, predominantly Mediterranean with occasional tropical plantings |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gkoltsiou, A.; Karampampa, M.-A. A Landscape Design Approach for Coastal Cycling Infrastructure Design: The Case Study of the Kallithea–Glyfada Seafront of Athens, Greece. Land 2025, 14, 1843. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091843
Gkoltsiou A, Karampampa M-A. A Landscape Design Approach for Coastal Cycling Infrastructure Design: The Case Study of the Kallithea–Glyfada Seafront of Athens, Greece. Land. 2025; 14(9):1843. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091843
Chicago/Turabian StyleGkoltsiou, Aikaterini, and Martha-Angeliki Karampampa. 2025. "A Landscape Design Approach for Coastal Cycling Infrastructure Design: The Case Study of the Kallithea–Glyfada Seafront of Athens, Greece" Land 14, no. 9: 1843. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091843
APA StyleGkoltsiou, A., & Karampampa, M.-A. (2025). A Landscape Design Approach for Coastal Cycling Infrastructure Design: The Case Study of the Kallithea–Glyfada Seafront of Athens, Greece. Land, 14(9), 1843. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091843