Next Article in Journal
Response Mechanism of Soil Microbial Characteristics to Different Land-Use Types in China
Previous Article in Journal
Relationship Between Landscape Character and Public Preferences in Urban Landscapes: A Case Study from the East–West Mountain Region in Wuhan, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Multi-Scenario Simulation of the Dynamic Relationship Between Land Use and Carbon Storage in the Urbanization Process: A Case Study of Zhengzhou, China

1
College of Resources and the environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China
2
Henan Engineering Research Center of Land Consolidation and Ecological Restoration, Zhengzhou 450046, China
3
Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450003, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2025, 14(6), 1227; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061227
Submission received: 10 May 2025 / Revised: 1 June 2025 / Accepted: 4 June 2025 / Published: 6 June 2025

Abstract

Rapid urbanization enhances the necessity of exploring sustainable development paths to achieve ecological and carbon storage protection. This study takes Zhengzhou, one of the national central cities in China, as a case to investigate the dynamic correlation between urbanization (UR) and carbon storage (CS). The PLUS and InVEST models were employed to simulate land use and carbon storage dynamics under natural development, cultivated land protection, and ecological protection scenarios for 2030 and 2040. This was also complemented by elasticity analysis of UR, construction land expansion (CEL), and CS. The results show that from 2000 to 2020, cultivated land declined by 15.33%, while construction land expanded by 13.31%. By 2030, construction land growth is expected to be 7.34%, 2.87%, and 4.96% across scenarios, with cultivated land of −6.96%, −2.36%, and −4.78%, respectively. Carbon storage in 2030 decreases under all scenarios (5.181 × 107 t, 5.235 × 107 t, 5.209 × 107 t) but stabilizes by 2040, with ecological protection enhancing forest/water bodies and mitigating losses. Elasticity analysis reveals that unconstrained elasticity coefficient significantly exacerbates carbon losses, while policy interventions reduce losses through expansion control and carbon sequestration. Integrating land use policies to balance farmland protection, ecological restoration, and low-carbon urban expansion is critical for sustainable megacity development and a scalable framework for carbon governance.
Keywords: land use change; PLUS model; InVEST model; carbon storage; urbanization land use change; PLUS model; InVEST model; carbon storage; urbanization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Q.; Liu, S.; Niu, Y.; Hu, Y.; Li, L.; Cai, E.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, M. Multi-Scenario Simulation of the Dynamic Relationship Between Land Use and Carbon Storage in the Urbanization Process: A Case Study of Zhengzhou, China. Land 2025, 14, 1227. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061227

AMA Style

Zhang Q, Liu S, Niu Y, Hu Y, Li L, Cai E, Zhang Y, Zhao M. Multi-Scenario Simulation of the Dynamic Relationship Between Land Use and Carbon Storage in the Urbanization Process: A Case Study of Zhengzhou, China. Land. 2025; 14(6):1227. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061227

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Qianqian, Siyuan Liu, Yilin Niu, Yajin Hu, Ling Li, Enxiang Cai, Yali Zhang, and Menglong Zhao. 2025. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of the Dynamic Relationship Between Land Use and Carbon Storage in the Urbanization Process: A Case Study of Zhengzhou, China" Land 14, no. 6: 1227. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061227

APA Style

Zhang, Q., Liu, S., Niu, Y., Hu, Y., Li, L., Cai, E., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, M. (2025). Multi-Scenario Simulation of the Dynamic Relationship Between Land Use and Carbon Storage in the Urbanization Process: A Case Study of Zhengzhou, China. Land, 14(6), 1227. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061227

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop