Next Article in Journal
Identifying Trade-Offs and Synergies of Production–Living–Ecological Functions and Their Drivers: The Case of Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations in China
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Dynamics of Land Use/Land Cover Changes between 1974 and 2016: A Study Case of the Bustillos Basin Using Remote Sensing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing the Efficiency of Two Silvicultural Approaches for Soil Erosion Mitigation Using a Novel Monitoring Apparatus

1
Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
2
Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences (DEB), Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
3
Maiella National Park, Via Badia 28, 67039 Sulmona, Italy
4
Department of Regional Affairs and Autonomies (DARA)—Presidency of the Council of Ministers, Via della Stamperia 8, 00186 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2024, 13(8), 1321; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081321
Submission received: 5 August 2024 / Accepted: 19 August 2024 / Published: 21 August 2024

Abstract

Soil erosion and hydrogeological risk are critical phenomena gaining increased recognition within the scientific community. Although these occurrences are naturally occurring, human activities can exacerbate their impacts. For example, deforestation consistently amplifies soil erosion. This study examines two distinct forest management strategies aimed at addressing soil erosion: the Banded Standards Method (BSM) and the Scattered Standards Method (SSM). We conducted a field experiment in two test areas located in central Italy, with one area employing the BSM and the other implementing the SSM. Two soil erosion plots were established, representing prototypes of a novel erosion monitoring apparatus called the Natural Erosion Trap (NET), or Diabrosimeter, specifically designed for forest environments. At regular intervals, particularly after significant storm events, sediment and leaf litter accumulated within the erosion plots were collected, dried, and weighed to quantify erosion rates and assess the efficacy of the silvicultural methods under investigation. The results revealed a 30.72% reduction in the eroded material with BSM compared to SSM, underscoring BSM’s ability to mitigate potential hazards and preserve environmental integrity.
Keywords: soil erosion; watershed management; forest management; soil conservation; experimental plots; silvicultural treatment soil erosion; watershed management; forest management; soil conservation; experimental plots; silvicultural treatment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salvaneschi, P.; Pica, A.; Apollonio, C.; Andrisano, T.; Pecci, M.; Petroselli, A.; Schirone, B. Assessing the Efficiency of Two Silvicultural Approaches for Soil Erosion Mitigation Using a Novel Monitoring Apparatus. Land 2024, 13, 1321. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081321

AMA Style

Salvaneschi P, Pica A, Apollonio C, Andrisano T, Pecci M, Petroselli A, Schirone B. Assessing the Efficiency of Two Silvicultural Approaches for Soil Erosion Mitigation Using a Novel Monitoring Apparatus. Land. 2024; 13(8):1321. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081321

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salvaneschi, Pietro, Antonio Pica, Ciro Apollonio, Teodoro Andrisano, Massimo Pecci, Andrea Petroselli, and Bartolomeo Schirone. 2024. "Assessing the Efficiency of Two Silvicultural Approaches for Soil Erosion Mitigation Using a Novel Monitoring Apparatus" Land 13, no. 8: 1321. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081321

APA Style

Salvaneschi, P., Pica, A., Apollonio, C., Andrisano, T., Pecci, M., Petroselli, A., & Schirone, B. (2024). Assessing the Efficiency of Two Silvicultural Approaches for Soil Erosion Mitigation Using a Novel Monitoring Apparatus. Land, 13(8), 1321. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081321

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop