Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Urban Park Accessibility Based on Space Syntax: Take the Urban Area of Changsha City as an Example
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Urban Clusters Based on Multisource Data—An Example of Three Major Urban Agglomerations in China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Eco–Environmental Effects of “Production–Living–Ecological” Space Land Use Changes and Recommendations for Ecological Restoration: A Case Study of the Weibei Dryland in Shaanxi Province

1
School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China
2
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2023, 12(5), 1060; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12051060
Submission received: 17 April 2023 / Revised: 10 May 2023 / Accepted: 11 May 2023 / Published: 12 May 2023

Abstract

As eco–environmental effects have become important considerations in the construction and planning of production, living, and ecological spaces, we used a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze the eco–environmental effects’ spatiotemporal evolution and present appropriate ideas for ecological restoration based on the land use data. The results show that during the research period both an improvement and degradation of the regional eco–environment occurred simultaneously. In the earlier period, the ecological environment tended to be worse, while in the later period, the eco–environmental quality was dramatically enhanced. Pasture ecological land in the study area had the strongest positive impact on the eco–environmental quality, while the negative effect of agricultural production land was severe. The quality of the regional eco−environment was enhanced (degraded) due to the extension (contraction) of ecological land. The construction of an ecological environment is a complex engineering task. Although the eco−environment in most areas of the study area showed an improving trend, the overall eco–environment remains relatively fragile. In the course of supporting high–quality regional social and economic growth and pursuing high–level environmental preservation strategies, we should take corresponding measures to protect and repair the regional ecological environment.
Keywords: eco–environmental effect; land use change; production–living–ecological space; ecological restoration; Weibei dryland eco–environmental effect; land use change; production–living–ecological space; ecological restoration; Weibei dryland

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, J.; Yin, S.; Yin, H.; Bai, X. Eco–Environmental Effects of “Production–Living–Ecological” Space Land Use Changes and Recommendations for Ecological Restoration: A Case Study of the Weibei Dryland in Shaanxi Province. Land 2023, 12, 1060. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12051060

AMA Style

Jin J, Yin S, Yin H, Bai X. Eco–Environmental Effects of “Production–Living–Ecological” Space Land Use Changes and Recommendations for Ecological Restoration: A Case Study of the Weibei Dryland in Shaanxi Province. Land. 2023; 12(5):1060. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12051060

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Junfang, Shuyan Yin, Hanmin Yin, and Xin Bai. 2023. "Eco–Environmental Effects of “Production–Living–Ecological” Space Land Use Changes and Recommendations for Ecological Restoration: A Case Study of the Weibei Dryland in Shaanxi Province" Land 12, no. 5: 1060. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12051060

APA Style

Jin, J., Yin, S., Yin, H., & Bai, X. (2023). Eco–Environmental Effects of “Production–Living–Ecological” Space Land Use Changes and Recommendations for Ecological Restoration: A Case Study of the Weibei Dryland in Shaanxi Province. Land, 12(5), 1060. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12051060

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop