Next Article in Journal
Examining the Relationships between Visitors Profile, Satisfaction and Revisit Intentions: Evidence from Romanian Ecotourism Destinations
Next Article in Special Issue
Quantifying the Spatial-Temporal Variation of Population Urbanization and Affordable Housing Land in China
Previous Article in Journal
Root Distribution and Soil Properties of Gully Heads and Their Effects on Headcut Migration in the Mollisols Region of Northeast China
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Dynamic Value of China’s High-Tech Zones: Direct and Indirect Influence on Urban Ecological Innovation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Did Polycentric and Compact Structure Reduce Carbon Emissions? A Spatial Panel Data Analysis of 286 Chinese Cities from 2002 to 2019

1
School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
2
School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2022, 11(2), 185; https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020185
Submission received: 9 January 2022 / Revised: 22 January 2022 / Accepted: 23 January 2022 / Published: 24 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Eco-Environmental Effects of Urban Land Use)

Abstract

Curbing carbon emissions by restricting economic growth could decrease human well-being across the world and especially in developing countries, suggesting that we need to find alternative approaches to reducing carbon emissions. Against this background, this paper investigates the relationship between urban spatial structure and carbon emissions in the Chinese context from 2002 to 2019. Specifically, urban spatial structure of 286 Chinese cities, represented by the two dimensions of polycentricity and compactness, are calculated based on the gridded (1 km × 1 km) LandScan dataset on population, while carbon emissions of these cities are aggregated from the gridded (1 km × 1 km) Open-source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic CO2 (ODIAC) dataset on carbon emissions. The empirical results based on different regression models find that overall (1) more dispersed and less monocentric (i.e., less compact and more polycentric) cities are often associated with lower levels of carbon emissions, ceteris paribus; (2) the impact of polycentricity on carbon emissions could be moderated by the economic development levels of Chinese cities. For cities with gross domestic product of more than 173 billion yuan, a more polycentric spatial structure is usually associated with a higher level of carbon emissions; (3) a city’s urban spatial structure could have positive spatial spillovers on carbon emissions of its neighboring cities.
Keywords: carbon emission; polycentricity; compactness; urban spatial structure; spatial Durbin model carbon emission; polycentricity; compactness; urban spatial structure; spatial Durbin model

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, K.; Tu, M.; Li, Y. Did Polycentric and Compact Structure Reduce Carbon Emissions? A Spatial Panel Data Analysis of 286 Chinese Cities from 2002 to 2019. Land 2022, 11, 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020185

AMA Style

Zhu K, Tu M, Li Y. Did Polycentric and Compact Structure Reduce Carbon Emissions? A Spatial Panel Data Analysis of 286 Chinese Cities from 2002 to 2019. Land. 2022; 11(2):185. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020185

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Kai, Manya Tu, and Yingcheng Li. 2022. "Did Polycentric and Compact Structure Reduce Carbon Emissions? A Spatial Panel Data Analysis of 286 Chinese Cities from 2002 to 2019" Land 11, no. 2: 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020185

APA Style

Zhu, K., Tu, M., & Li, Y. (2022). Did Polycentric and Compact Structure Reduce Carbon Emissions? A Spatial Panel Data Analysis of 286 Chinese Cities from 2002 to 2019. Land, 11(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020185

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop