Duration of Cultivation Has Varied Impacts on Soil Charge Properties in Different Agro-Ecological Zones of Ghana
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
I suggest a better explanation in the abstract of the main motivations, gaps, objectives, methodologies, novelties and main insights (the insights presented in the abstract are general and to present them was not needed to carry out research).
The methodologies used need better explanation and scientific support. Maybe a scheme could better highlight objectives, methodologies and structure of the paper.
It is a little hard to follow the results presented. It would be important to better explain the tables. There are information in the tables that need a legend.
The conclusions section should be improved with practical implications, policy recommendations and future research.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
Please find our response in the attached file.
Kind regards
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
See attached file
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
Thank you very much for reviewing our manuscript. Please find our responses in the attached file.
Kind regards
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 3 Report
Please see the atachment
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
Thank you very much for reviewing our manuscript. Please find our responses in the attached file.
Kind regards
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 4 Report
My comments are in the attachment.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
Thank you very much for reviewing our manuscript. Please find our responses in the attached file.
Kind regards
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Authors did not answer to any question of my first report.
I suggest the authors consider it point by point and present a report with the answers point by point.
Author Response
Please find our responses attached.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
All of my comments were sufficiently answered in the revised version of the manuscript. However, Figure 1 should be reconstructed
Author Response
Dear Reviewer 2,
Thank you very much for another important comment. We have now replaced Figure 1.
Thank you very much.