Analyzing the Value and Evolution of Land Use Functions from “Demand–Function–Value” Perspective: A Framework and Case Study from Zhangjiakou City, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (1)
- Present the logic of formation of LUFs’ values, as well as set out a valuation methodology;
- (2)
- Measure and map the value of land use economic, social, and ecological functions employing monetary metrics in Zhangjiakou City;
- (3)
- Analyze the evolution characteristics of LUFs, and the combination and dominance of LUFs in Zhangjiakou City between 1990 and 2015;
- (4)
- Provide scientific references for coordinated improvement for LUFs in Zhangjiakou City.
2. Analytical Framework for Valuation and Evolution of LUFs from the “Demand–Function–Value” Perspective
3. Data and Methods
3.1. Case Study Area
3.2. Methodology
3.2.1. Data Collection and Pre-Processing
3.2.2. Methods for Valuation of LUFs
LUFs’ Classification and Indicator Systems
LUFs’ Value Calculation
3.2.3. Identifying the Diversity and Dominance of LUFs
4. Results
4.1. Evolution Characteristics of LUFs
4.1.1. Change in the Total Value of LUFs
4.1.2. Changes of the Spatial Patterns of LUFs
4.2. Evolution in Diversity and Dominance of LUFs
4.2.1. Change in Diversity of LUFs
4.2.2. Change in Dominance of LUFs
5. Discussion
5.1. Implications for Identification and Optimization of Ecological–Production–Living Space
5.2. Coordinated Improvement for LUFs in Zhangjiakou City
5.3. Advantages and Limitations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Long, H.L.; Qu, Y. Land use transitions and land management: A mutual feedback perspective. Land Use Policy 2018, 74, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, G.; Fu, J.; Jiang, D. Production–living–ecological conflict identification using a multiscale integration model based on spatial suitability analysis and sustainable development evaluation: A case study of Ningbo, China. Land 2021, 10, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.C.; Lin, H.X.; Qi, X.X. A literature review on optimization of spatial development pattern based on ecological-production-living space. Prog. Geogr. 2017, 36, 378–391. [Google Scholar]
- Pérez-Soba, M.; Petit, S.; Jones, L.; Bertrand, N.; Briquel, V.; Omodei-Zorini, L.; Contini, C.; Helming, K.; Farrington, J.H.; Mossello, M.T.; et al. Land use functions-A multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use change on land use sustainability. In Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes; Helming, K., Pérez-Soba, M., Tabbush, P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 375–404. [Google Scholar]
- Gaodi, X.; Lin, Z.; Caixia, Z.; Xiangzheng, D.; Koenig, H.J.; Tscherning, K.; Helming, K. Assessing the multifunctionalities of land use in China. J. Resour. Ecol. 2010, 1, 311–318. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, Y.; Jin, X.; Gan, L.; Jessup, L.H.; Pijanowski, B.C.; Yang, X.; Xiang, X.; Zhou, Y. Spatial identification and dynamic analysis of land use functions reveals distinct zones of multiple functions in eastern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 642, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.Y.; Bao, W.K.; Liu, Y.S. Coupling coordination analysis of rural production-living-ecological space in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 107, 106512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, X.; Gu, Z.; Lei, M.; Wang, X. The differences between land use function and land use to reflecting the change of land use system and their impacts on landscape pattern-A case study of Lantian County in Shaanxi Province, China. J. Natur. Resour. 2014, 29, 1127–1135. [Google Scholar]
- Dai, W.; Jiang, F.; Huang, W.; Liao, L.; Jiang, K. Study on transition of land use function and ecosystem service value based on the conception of production, living and ecological space-A case study of the Fuzhou New Area. J. Natur. Resour. 2018, 33, 2098–2109. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, L.L.; Zheng, X.Q.; Yuan, Z.Y.; Cui, H.N. Assessment on multi-functionality of land use based on the entire-array-polygon indictor method in Tangshan. China Land Sci. 2016, 30, 23–32. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, D.; Xu, J.C.; Lin, Z.L. Conflict or coordination? Assessing land use multi-functionalization using production-living-ecology analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 577, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.L.; Liao, H.P.; Li, J.; Cai, J.; Li, T.; Wang, Q. Analysis of characteristics and influencing factors of multi-functional spatial pattern of land use in ecological frangible regions. China Land Sci. 2020, 34, 75–83. [Google Scholar]
- Duan, J.N.; Liu, S.H.; Li, P.; Yang, W. Study on Research Progress and Directions of Land Functions. China Land Sci. 2020, 34, 8–16. [Google Scholar]
- Meng, J.J.; Wang, Q.; Li, F.; Kuo, L. Assessing multifunctional land use in the middle reach of the Heihe River basin based on spatial variances. Geogr. Res. 2019, 38, 369–382. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, C.; Xu, Y.Q.; Huang, A.; Liu, Y.X.; Wang, H.; Lu, L.L.; Sun, P.L.; Zheng, W.R. Spatial identification of land use multifunctionality at grid scale in farming-pastoral area: A case study of Zhangjiakou City, China. Habitat Int. 2018, 76, 48–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, Z.; Song, C.; Zheng, H.; Polasky, S.; Xiao, Y.; Bateman, I.J.; Liu, J.; Ruckelshaus, M.; Shi, F.; Xiao, Y.; et al. Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 14593–14601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costanza, R.; D’arge, R.; De Groot, R.S.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J.; et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernués, A.; Rodríguez-Ortega, T.; Ripoll-Bosch, R.; Alfnes, F. Socio-cultural and economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by mediterranean mountain agroecosystems. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102479. [Google Scholar]
- Hou, M.Y.; Yao, S.B.; Deng, Y.J.; Ding, Z.M.; Lu, Y.N.; Zheng, X.; Li, Y.N. Spatial-temporal evolution pattern and differentiation of ecological service value in Yan’an city at the grid scale based on Sloping Land Conversion Program. J. Natur. Resour. 2019, 34, 539–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Zhen, L. A comparative assessment of land use functions based on perceptions of policy makers and local farmers in Guyuan, western China. J. Natur. Resour. 2017, 8, 232–241. [Google Scholar]
- Ying, H.; Li, Y.B. Land use functions dynamics pattern of Caotangxi watershed in the three gorges reservoir area. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2017, 26, 227–236. [Google Scholar]
- Xue, Z.; Zhen, L.; Md Giashuddin, M.; Kikuko, S. Impact assessment of land use functions on the sustainable regional development of representative Asian countries: A comparative study in Bangladesh, China and Japan. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 694, 133689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paracchini, M.L.; Pacini, C.; Jones, M.L.M.; Pérez-Soba, M. An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Dong, Y.X. Spatial differences and influencing factors of land use function in Guangzhou. Resour. Sci. 2015, 37, 2179–2192. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, P.L.; Xu, Y.Q.; Liu, Q.G.; Liu, C.; Huang, A. Spatiotemporal differentiation and driving factors of multi-functionality of land use in county scale in poverty belt around Beijing and Tianjin. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agr. Eng. 2017, 33, 283–292. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, J.; Hu, X.X.; Qiu, S.J.; Hu, Y.N.; Meersmans, J.; Liu, Y.X. Multifunctional landscapes identification and associated development zoning in mountainous area. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 660, 765–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, Y.N.; Long, H.L.; Tu, S.S.; Ge, D.Z.; Ma, L. Spatial identification of land use functions and their tradeoffs/synergies in China: Implications for sustainable land management. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 107, 105550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lester, S.E.; Costello, C.; Halpern, B.S.; Gaines, S.D.; White, C.; Barth, J.A. Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 2013, 38, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lin, A.W.; Zhan, X.; Peng, Y.L.; Xia, Y.; Yue, B.J.; Qin, W.J. Study on functional zoning of land use in the Greater Mekong Sub-region: A case study of central Laos. Geomat. Spat. Inf. Technol. 2016, 39, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Wiggering, H.; Dalchow, C.; Glemnitz, M.; Helming, K.; Müller, K.; Schultz, A.; Stachow, U.; Zander, P. Indicators for multifunctional land use: Linking socio-economicrequirements with landscape potentials. Ecol. Indic. 2006, 6, 238–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, L.; Liu, Y.; Yang, J.; Yang, S.; Wang, Y.; Hu, X. Quantitative identification and spatial analysis of land use ecological-production-living functions in rural areas on China’s southeast coast. Habitat Int. 2020, 100, 102182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhen, L.; Cao, S.Y.; Wei, Y.J.; Xie, G.D.; Li, F.; Li, Y. Land use functions: Conceptual framework and application for China. Resour. Sci. 2009, 31, 544–551. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, C.; Xu, Y.Q.; Sun, P.L.; Huang, A.; Zheng, W.R. Land use change and its driving forces toward mutual conversion in Zhangjiakou City, a farming-pastoral ecotone in Northern China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2017, 189, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, J.L.; Sun, J.L. Some in-depth thoughts on resources and environmental comprehensive scientific expedition using gridding approach in China. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2015, 17, 758–764. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.; Wu, S.H.; Liu, Y.H.; Yang, Q.Y.; Zhang, Y.H. Simulation of distribution of agricultural output value influenced by land use and topographical indices in Tibet. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agr. Eng. 2007, 23, 59–65. [Google Scholar]
- Dai, Z.; Hu, Y.; Zhao, G. The suitability of different nighttime light data for GDP estimation at different spatial scales and regional levels. Sustainability 2017, 9, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhao, M.; Cheng, W.M.; Zhou, C.H.; Li, M.C.; Wang, N.; Liu, Q.Y. GDP spatialization and economic differences in south China based on NPP-VIIRS nighttime light imagery. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Taelman, S.E.; Schaubroeck, T.; De Meester, S.; Boone, L.; Dewulf, J. Accounting for land use in life cycle assessment-The value of NPP as a proxy indicator to assess land use impacts on ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 550, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, X.B.; Lin, J.; Wang, J.; Li, Q.F.; Sun, Y.W. Impacts of productive ratio coefficient on grade of farmland classification. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agr. Eng. 2009, 25, 237–243. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, M.; Li, X.; Li, S.; Xin, L.; Wang, X.; Li, Q.; Li, W.; Li, Y.; Xiang, W. Modeling population density based on nighttime light images and land use data in China. Appl. Geogr. 2018, 90, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.F.; Ren, Z.Y.; Lin, Z.H. Dynamic assessment of the values of CO2 fixation and O2 release in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau ecosystem. Geogr. Res. 2013, 32, 663–670. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, C.; Ren, Z.Y. Dynamic evaluation of the value of carbon fixation and oxygen release based on land ecosystem in Northern Shaanxi. Geogr. Res. 2015, 34, 1522–1534. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, A.; Xu, Y.; Sun, P.; Zhou, G.; Liu, C.; Lu, L.; Xiang, Y.; Wang, H. Land use/land cover changes and its impact on ecosystem services in ecologically fragile zone: A case study of Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province, China. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 104, 604–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Y.W.; Gao, J.X.; Wang, B.L.; Liu, C.C.; Wang, J.; Tuo, X.S. Evaluation of soil conservation function and its values in major eco-function areas of Loess Plateau in eastern Gansu province. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agr. Eng. 2012, 28, 78–85. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, A.; Devi, M.; Deshmukh, B. Integrated remote sensing and geographic information system based RUSLE modelling for estimation of soil loss in Western Himalaya, India. Water Resour. Manag. 2014, 28, 3307–3317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.B.; Zhou, Q.F.; Chang, Q.; Li, S.C. Evaluating the ecological service function of soil conservation based on RUSLE and GIS. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Pekin. 2009, 45, 151–157. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.; Ren, Z.Y. Variations in ecosystem service value in response to land use changes in the Loess Plateau in northern Shaanxi province, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2011, 5, 109–118. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, N.X. A study on inflation rate and the moderate range of economic growth: Based on the analysis of GDP deflator index. Price Theory Pract. 2019, 1, 83–87. [Google Scholar]
- Duan, Y.M.; Wang, H.; Huang, A.; Xu, Y.Q.; Lu, L.H.; Ji, Z.X. Identification and spatial-temporal evolution of rural “production-living-ecological” space from the perspective of villagers’ behavior: A case study of Ertai Town, Zhangjiakou City. Land Use Policy 2021, 106, 105457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, J. Spatial organization pathway for territorial function-structure: Discussion on implementation of major function zoning strategy in territorial spatial planning. Geogr. Res. 2019, 38, 2373–2387. [Google Scholar]
- Tu, S.S.; Long, H.L.; Zhang, Y.N.; Ge, D.Z.; Qu, Y. Rural restructuring at village level under rapid urbanization in metropolitansuburbs of China and its implications for innovations in land use policy. Habitat Int. 2018, 77, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartmann, T.; Jehling, M. From diversity to justice: Unraveling pluralistic rationalities in urban design. Cities 2019, 91, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verburg, P.H.; van de Steeg, J.; Veldkamp, A.; Willemen, L. From land cover change to land function dynamics: A major challenge to improve land characterization. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 1327–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maes, J.; Paracchini, M.L.; Zulian, G. A European Assessment of the Provision of Ecosystem Services-Towards an Atlas of Ecosystem Services; EUR, Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dominance Type of LUFs | Diversity Type of LUFs | Criterion |
---|---|---|
ENFD | ENP–SS–ELT | ENV > SV > ELV |
EP–SS | ENV > SV, and ELV = 0 | |
ENP–ELS–ST | ENV > ELV > SV | |
ENP–ELS | ENV > ELV, and SV = 0 | |
ENI | ENV ≠ 0, ELV = 0, and SV = 0 | |
SFD | SP–ENS–ELT | SV > ENV > ELV |
SP–ENS | SV > ENV, and ELV = 0 | |
SP–ELS–ENT | SV > ELV > ENV | |
SP–ELS | SV > ELV, and ENV = 0 | |
SI | SV ≠ 0, ELV = 0, and ENV = 0 | |
ELFD | ELP–ENS–ST | ELV > ENV > SV |
ELP–ENS | ELV > ENV, and SV = 0 | |
ELP–SS–ENT | ELV > SV > ENV | |
ELP–SS | ENV > SV, and ENV = 0 | |
ELI | ELV ≠ 0, SV = 0, and ENV = 0 |
Function Type | Function Value/108 RMB | Net Change in Function Value/108 RMB | Annual Average Variation Ratio of Function Value/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1990 | 2000 | 2015 | 1990–2000 | 2000–2015 | 1990–2015 | 1990–2000 | 2000–2015 | 1990–2015 | |
Economic | 24.24 | 69.58 | 486.51 | 45.34 | 416.93 | 462.27 | 18.70 | 39.95 | 76.28 |
Social | 130.71 | 349.26 | 2886.2 | 218.55 | 2536.94 | 2755.49 | 16.72 | 48.43 | 84.32 |
Ecological | 144.8 | 157.55 | 184.95 | 12.75 | 27.4 | 40.15 | 0.88 | 1.16 | 1.11 |
Index | Economic Function | Social Function | Ecological Function | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Moran’s I | 1990 | 0.808 *** | 0.589 *** | 0.934 *** |
2000 | 0.917 *** | 0.630 *** | 0.931 *** | |
2015 | 0.814 *** | 0.705 *** | 0.926 *** | |
G(d) | 1990 | 0.001 *** | 0.001 *** | 0.000 *** |
2000 | 0.002 *** | 0.001 *** | 0.000 *** | |
2015 | 0.002 *** | 0.001 *** | 0.000 *** |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, C.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, L.; Lu, X.; Yang, Q. Analyzing the Value and Evolution of Land Use Functions from “Demand–Function–Value” Perspective: A Framework and Case Study from Zhangjiakou City, China. Land 2022, 11, 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010053
Liu C, Xu Y, Wang Y, Cheng L, Lu X, Yang Q. Analyzing the Value and Evolution of Land Use Functions from “Demand–Function–Value” Perspective: A Framework and Case Study from Zhangjiakou City, China. Land. 2022; 11(1):53. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010053
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Chao, Yueqing Xu, Yue Wang, Long Cheng, Xinhai Lu, and Qingke Yang. 2022. "Analyzing the Value and Evolution of Land Use Functions from “Demand–Function–Value” Perspective: A Framework and Case Study from Zhangjiakou City, China" Land 11, no. 1: 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010053
APA StyleLiu, C., Xu, Y., Wang, Y., Cheng, L., Lu, X., & Yang, Q. (2022). Analyzing the Value and Evolution of Land Use Functions from “Demand–Function–Value” Perspective: A Framework and Case Study from Zhangjiakou City, China. Land, 11(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010053