Next Article in Journal
Synergistic Nitrogen and Phosphorus Elimination via Iron–Carbon Micro-Electrolysis in Constructed Wetlands Treating Low-Pollution Water
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Floodplain Sediment Deposition Using Synthetic Aperture Radar-Based Surface Deformation Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Survey of School Direct-Drinking Water Access for Children and Youth in Shanghai, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Modeling the Tradeoff Between Water Loss, Chlorine Residuals, and Trihalomethanes in Rural Appalachia, USA

1
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
2
Public Works Division, Saint Paul, MN 55102, USA
3
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
4
Kentucky Water Research Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(21), 3138; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17213138 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 27 August 2025 / Revised: 10 October 2025 / Accepted: 30 October 2025 / Published: 31 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design and Management of Water Distribution Systems)

Abstract

Small rural water utilities in the Appalachia region of the US often experience extreme water loss while struggling to maintain water quality compliance. This study quantifies the impact of reducing water loss on distribution system water quality in Martin County, Kentucky. Hydraulic and water quality models were developed, calibrated, and validated using EPANET for chlorine residuals and KYPIPE for trihalomethane (TTHM) formation. The models evaluated water loss reduction scenarios ranging from the current 70% to the industry target of 15%. Results showed that lowering water loss increased residence times, causing chlorine residual declines of 22–68%, with one site falling to the 0.2 mg/L threshold. TTHM concentrations increased by 12–18% in winter–spring and 26–44% in summer–fall, with two sites exceeding the individual 0.080 mg/L maximum contaminant level. These novel findings indicate that reducing water loss can unintentionally degrade water quality, underscoring the need for integrated planning. Recommended mitigation strategies include seasonal operational adjustments, water source and TTHM precursor management, optimized tank management, targeted flushing, and phased infrastructure upgrades. The modeling framework developed offers potential for broader application in other rural systems facing similar challenges.
Keywords: water quality modeling; hydraulic modeling; water loss optimization; chlorine residual modeling; TTHM modeling; Appalachian water utilities; KYPIPE; EPANET; water distribution systems water quality modeling; hydraulic modeling; water loss optimization; chlorine residual modeling; TTHM modeling; Appalachian water utilities; KYPIPE; EPANET; water distribution systems

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fordjour, G.; Gautam, Y.; Ormsbee, L.; Yost, S.; Unrine, J. Modeling the Tradeoff Between Water Loss, Chlorine Residuals, and Trihalomethanes in Rural Appalachia, USA. Water 2025, 17, 3138. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17213138

AMA Style

Fordjour G, Gautam Y, Ormsbee L, Yost S, Unrine J. Modeling the Tradeoff Between Water Loss, Chlorine Residuals, and Trihalomethanes in Rural Appalachia, USA. Water. 2025; 17(21):3138. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17213138

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fordjour, George, Yogesh Gautam, Lindell Ormsbee, Scott Yost, and Jason Unrine. 2025. "Modeling the Tradeoff Between Water Loss, Chlorine Residuals, and Trihalomethanes in Rural Appalachia, USA" Water 17, no. 21: 3138. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17213138

APA Style

Fordjour, G., Gautam, Y., Ormsbee, L., Yost, S., & Unrine, J. (2025). Modeling the Tradeoff Between Water Loss, Chlorine Residuals, and Trihalomethanes in Rural Appalachia, USA. Water, 17(21), 3138. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17213138

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop