Next Article in Journal
Modeling the Effects of Underground Brine Extraction on Shallow Groundwater Flow and Oilfield Fluid Leakage Pathways in the Yellow River Delta
Previous Article in Journal
Quantitative Detection of Floating Debris in Inland Reservoirs Using Sentinel-1 SAR Imagery: A Case Study of Daecheong Reservoir
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Luminescence Dating of Holocene Fluvial Sediments from the Daluze Area in the North China Plain

1
Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
2
Key Laboratory of Quaternary Chronology and Environment Evolution, China Geological Survey, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(13), 1942; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131942
Submission received: 22 May 2025 / Revised: 20 June 2025 / Accepted: 20 June 2025 / Published: 28 June 2025

Abstract

Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating is an important method for determining the ages of late Quaternary sediments. However, partial bleaching of quartz in fluvial sediments remains a challenge, with debates on grain-size effects in different sedimentary environments. The aim of this paper is to explore the bleaching degree and its influencing factors of different grain-size quartz in fluvial sediments from the Yanchi section in the Daluze area, North China Plain. According to sedimentological methods and grain size analysis, lacustrine and fluvial layers were identified, and the ages of sediments were determined by OSL and 14C methods. The key findings are as follows: (1) Fine-grained quartz can be better bleached than coarse/medium-grained quartz for early–middle Holocene fluvial sediments. (2) The OSL method can yield reliable ages for early–middle Holocene fluvial sediments, while it overestimates these for late Holocene fluvial sediments. This probably results from variations in sediment sources and hydrodynamic conditions. (3) The dating results show that there are three fluvial activity periods in the Daluze area: 10.8~10.2 ka, 5.3~4.7 ka, and after 1 ka. This paper provides a reliable chronological framework for the evolution of regional sedimentary environments and offers references for luminescence dating of fluvial sediments in similar environments.

1. Introduction

Accurate chronological determination of fluvial sediments is essential for understanding the development and evolution of Holocene fluvial geomorphology. Radiocarbon (14C) dating is one of the primary methods for dating Holocene sediments and is generally reliable for lacustrine deposits. However, its application to fluvial sediments is challenged by the scarcity of organic material, carbon reservoir effects, and re-deposition processes [1,2,3,4]. In contrast, optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating utilizing quartz and feldspar grains, which are commonly found in fluvial sediments, offers a direct means of dating the last exposure of mineral grains to sunlight prior to burial. This makes OSL widely applicable to the dating of fluvial sediments [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Nevertheless, a major limitation in applying OSL to fluvial sediments is the potential for incomplete bleaching of the luminescence signal before burial, which can result in significant age overestimation [5,8,13]. This issue is particularly pronounced when dating young Holocene deposits [8,14]. Quartz typically bleaches more rapidly than the infrared-stimulated luminescence signal of K-feldspar [8] and therefore holds greater potential for accurately dating young Holocene sediments.
Research suggests that grain size significantly influences the bleaching efficiency of quartz OSL signals, but findings remain inconclusive [8]. Some studies propose that coarse-grained quartz exhibits superior bleaching characteristics [7,15,16], primarily because these grains are transported via traction or saltation over longer distances and at slower velocities, thereby receiving greater exposure to sunlight prior to deposition [7,17]. In contrast, fine grains may be encapsulated within aggregates, which limit their sunlight exposure and consequently lead to age overestimation in OSL dating [7,17]. Even when coarse grains are not fully bleached, the use of small aliquots or single-grain analysis in combination with statistical models can effectively reduce the impact of incomplete bleaching [8,9,17]. Conversely, other studies argue that fine-grained quartz may bleach more effectively [18,19], largely because these grains can remain suspended in the water column for extended durations, increasing their exposure to sunlight. Meanwhile, coarse grains tend to settle more rapidly on the riverbed, and turbidity in the water column can attenuate light penetration, limiting bleaching during transport [5,20]. Additional findings indicate that the bleaching efficiency of fine-grained quartz varies according to depositional processes. For example, [9] reported that fine-grained quartz in sediments deposited in the Yangtze River Delta between 9~2 ka (1 ka = 1000 years before the present) was well bleached and yielded reliable ages. However, younger deposits from 0.6~0.4 ka exhibited clear signs of incomplete bleaching, likely due to differences in sediment sources and transport mechanisms. Similarly, [16] measured the equivalent doses (De) of quartz in modern Yellow River sediments and found that fine grains within sand layers had De values ranging from 5 to 20 Gy (Gy: gray, the SI unit of radiation dose, where 1 Gy = 1 J/kg, used to measure the total ionizing radiation received by sediments), whereas suspended fine quartz grains—more thoroughly bleached—showed residual De values of less than 3 Gy. These results underscore the significant role of depositional mode in influencing the bleaching efficiency of fine-grained quartz OSL signals. In summary, the complex nature of fluvial deposition leads to spatial and temporal variability in the bleaching efficiency of quartz grains of different sizes. Further comparative studies examining OSL ages across multiple grain sizes, and validated against independent dating methods, are needed to better understand bleaching behavior and its controlling factors under diverse depositional environments.
The North China Plain is the second largest plain in China. Due to frequent river avulsions and flooding, numerous depressions and paleolakes have formed, resulting in the accumulation of abundant fluvial and lacustrine sediments. OSL ages have been obtained using quartz of various grain sizes from both river and lake deposits. For fine-grained quartz, [21] reported good bleaching efficiency in fluvial sediments of Baiyangdian since the late Pleistocene, based on agreement between fine-grained quartz and mixed-mineral OSL ages. However, [22] found that fine quartz in fluvial flood deposits from the past 1 ka in the paleolake area was poorly bleached, leading to age overestimations ranging from 1 to 10 ka. Regarding medium- or coarse-grained quartz, [23] dated Holocene fluvio-lacustrine sediments from a site near the shoreline and concluded that in clay-rich fluvial flood deposits, OSL ages results were overestimated by 3~6 ka. However, they found the method suitable for OSL dating in silt-dominated deposits. In contrast, ref. [22] observed that coarse-grained quartz in silt-dominated flood layers of <1 ka deposits also yielded age overestimations of 0.5~3 ka. In conclusion, for fluvial sediments from diverse environmental settings across the region, it remains uncertain which quartz grain size exhibits better bleaching behavior and how to reliably determine accurate OSL ages.
This study focuses on a Holocene river–lake sedimentary section located in the North China Plain. Based on sedimentary characteristics, fluvial and lacustrine units were identified. OSL dating was conducted on fine-, medium-, and coarse-grained quartz extracted from fluvial deposits, and results were cross-validated using OSL and radiocarbon (14C) ages from adjacent lacustrine layers to evaluate the reliability of the fluvial OSL ages. We assessed the bleaching efficiency of different quartz grain sizes and investigated the causes of variation in bleaching behavior based on grain size analysis. The aim of this study is to determine how reliable OSL ages can be obtained for fluvial sediments in the North China Plain.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The North China Plain is an alluvial plain shaped by the Yellow, Huai, Hai, and Luan Rivers. During historical periods, numerous depressions and lakes existed across this region. Daluze was once among the largest lakes in the North China Plain [24]. It has shrunk into two small lakes, which are Ningjinbo in the north and Daluze in the south [25]. At present, the area is occasionally inundated by floodwaters. The Daluze area is located in the central part of the North China Plain, within a structural depression between the piedmont fans of the Taihang Mountains and abandoned courses of the Yellow River. It represents a typical fan-front and inter-fan depression formed by differential accumulation. The Laozhang River and the Hutuo River lie to its south and north, respectively (Figure 1). Historically, Long-source rivers such as the Yellow River, Laozhang River, Hutuo River, as well as short-source rivers originating from the Taihang Mountain such as Fuyang River, Sha River, and many other rivers, have all flowed into or through Daluze/Ningjinbo lake [26,27].
The sedimentary strata of Daluze consist of alluvial-type lacustrine deposits, which are representative of those found across the North China Plain. Previous studies have shown that the Holocene strata in this region are characterized by lacustrine deposits interbedded with multiple fluvial flood layers [22,24,26]. Numerous scholars have examined Holocene lake evolution and climate change based on these sediments [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35] and have analyzed the fluvial components using indicators such as grain size, magnetic susceptibility, organic carbon content, pollen, and elemental composition. It has been suggested that, in addition to materials transported by piedmont rivers, some sediments may have originated from the Yellow River [24,26].

2.2. Sedimentary Characteristics of the Section and Sample Collection

The YC (Yanchi) section (37°16′17.17″ N, 114°53′48.48″ E) is located in the central part of Daluze (Figure 1) and has a total depth of 1085 cm. Lithologic descriptions are provided in Table 1, with the lithologic column and field photographs shown in Figure 2. Overall, the YC section contains two distinct gray–black silty clay layers (Figure 2), situated at depths of 660~710 cm and 926~970 cm, respectively, and separated by an approximately 210 cm thick layer of gray–yellow silt. Above 660 cm, the deposits mainly consist of interbedded gray–yellow silt and brown to reddish-brown silty clay. Between 970 and 1085 cm, the lithology exhibits marked changes, transitioning downward through gray–yellow silt, brown clayey silt, brown–yellow fine sand, and bluish-gray clayey silt. The thickness of individual layers ranges from 20 to 50 cm.
In the study area, fluvial flood deposits and lacustrine sediments differ markedly in color, grain size, and sedimentary structure. In addition, abrupt contacts between adjacent strata provide clear evidence for the identification of flood events. Accordingly, this study distinguishes fluvial flood deposits and delineates sedimentary units based on field characteristics such as color, lithology, sedimentary structure, fabric, and contact relationships, in combination with regional sedimentological insights. The main sedimentary units identified in the YC section include the modern soil layer, mountain flood layer, fluvial flood layer, and lacustrine layer. Detailed stratigraphic divisions and their characteristics are presented in Table 1.
Modern soil layer: This unit, composed of modern soil, exhibits clear signs of pedogenesis and aggregate structures, including plant roots and root holes (Figure 2a).
Fluvial flood deposits: These deposits typically consist of interbedded gray–yellow silt and reddish-brown silty clay (Figure 2b), occasionally containing brown/yellow fine sand or clayey silt, consistent with characteristics of fluvial flood deposits in the North China Plain [36,37]. Variations in grain size reflect hydrodynamic fluctuations during flood events with stronger flows depositing coarser material. Silt layers are generally thicker (50~180 cm) than silty clay layers (20~40 cm). Flood Layers 2 and 4 each contain approximately 1.7 m thick gray–yellow silt beds, indicating high-magnitude floods and abundant sediment supply. Contacts with underlying mountain flood layer or lacustrine layers are sharp (Figure 2c,d).
Mountain flood layer: This unit consists of thick brown silty clay that is blocky, dense, and relatively homogeneous, containing aggregates with a diameter of mainly 0.5~10 mm, exhibiting characteristics similar to those formed through pedogenesis (Figure 2c). Its structural characteristics resemble those of paleosols, leading to the inference that this layer was deposited by mountain flood events transporting slope-derived soils to the site. In addition to distinct sedimentary structures compared to fluvial flood deposits, the mountain flood layer is notably thicker (nearly 100 cm), whereas silty clay layers within fluvial flood deposits are generally thinner (20–40 cm).
Lacustrine deposits: These deposits consist of dense gray–black silty clay (Figure 2d) that is clearly distinguishable from other sediment types by its distinct color and sharp stratigraphic boundaries.
Grain size analysis samples, as well as OSL and 14C dating samples, were collected from the YC section. A total of 377 grain size analysis samples were obtained at 2~5 cm intervals from top to bottom except for the modern soil layer. To constrain the chronology of the stratigraphic units, 27 OSL samples were collected from various depths. Additionally, 3 14C dating samples were taken from the tops of the two lacustrine layers (lacustrine Layers 1 and 2) for age comparison. Previous studies have addressed the OSL dating results of quartz grains of different particle sizes from strata above 660 cm [22]. This study focuses on the OSL dating results of sediments below 660 cm, alongside a comprehensive analysis of the bleaching efficiency of quartz grains of varying sizes and the factors influencing it.

2.3. Methods

2.3.1. Grain Size Analysis

Each sample (3~5 g) was placed in a 100 mL beaker, to which 10 mL of a 2:1 hydrogen peroxide solution (by volume) was added. The mixture was heated while distilled water was continuously added to prevent drying. After bubbling ceased, 10 mL of a 2:1 hydrochloric acid solution was added, with distilled water again added as needed. Following boiling, the beaker was removed from heat and allowed to cool. Approximately 50 mL of distilled water was then added, and the sample was left to stand for 12 h. The supernatant was decanted, leaving about 20 mL of sediment. Subsequently, 10 mL of 36 g/L sodium hexametaphosphate dispersant was added and stirred thoroughly. The sample was placed in an ultrasonic bath and sonicated for approximately 10 min at 50% power. Grain size analysis was conducted using a Mastersizer 2000 Laser Particle Size Analyzer, produced by Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK. Sediment grain sizes were classified as follows: D > 62.5 μm; silt: 3.9~62.5 μm; clay: D < 3.9 μm.

2.3.2. OSL Dating

OSL dating samples were prepared under red light conditions (wavelength 640 ± 10 nm) in the laboratory. Approximately 2 cm was removed from each end of the stainless steel tube, and around 20 g of sediment was extracted for determining the concentrations of U, Th, and K and for measuring water content. The remaining central portion of each sample was treated with 30% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and 10% hydrochloric acid (HCl) to remove organic matter and carbonates. Subsequently, samples were etched with 30% hydrofluorosilicic acid for approximately 5 days and repeatedly washed with distilled water until neutral pH was achieved. For fine-grained or medium-grained samples, fine grains (4~11 μm, abbreviated as “f”) were separated using the sedimentation method, while medium grains (41~65 μm, abbreviated as “m”) were separated by wet sieving. These fractions were further etched with 30% hydrofluorosilicic acid for about 5 days and washed to neutrality. Coarse-grained samples (65~90 μm or 90~125 μm, abbreviated as “c”) were separated by sieving and etched with 40% hydrofluoric acid (HF) for 40~60 min, followed by washing with distilled water, low-temperature drying, and removal of magnetic minerals.
The purity of each sample was confirmed by infrared signal measurement, verifying that the quartz was sufficiently pure. De values were measured by using the Lexsyg Smart TL/OSL Reader (Freiberg Instruments GmbH, Dresden, Germany) following the single-aliquot regenerative dose (SAR) protocol [38]. Details are provided in Table 2.
Annual dose rates were calculated based on the concentrations of uranium, thorium, and potassium measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Conversion factors followed the values recommended by [39]. Cosmic dose rates were estimated following the method of [40]. Since water attenuates α, β, and γ radiation, water content during burial has a direct impact on the annual dose rate. After collection, samples were sealed and water content measured as soon as possible. The estimated average burial water content was derived from measured values and depositional environment conditions. Dose rate corrections were applied according to the method of [41]. Environmental dose rates and age calculations were performed using DRAC (Dose Rate and Age Calculator) [42].

2.3.3. 14C Dating

14C sample analysis involved sample pretreatment and accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). Sample preparation included both raw sample pretreatment and graphite target preparation. Pretreatment aimed to remove inorganic carbon (particularly minerals such as calcite, marble, and dolomite) as well as exogenous organic material attached to sample surfaces. A standard acid–alkali–acid (ABA) procedure (2 mol/L HCl, 0.5% NaOH) was employed to eliminate exogenous carbon contamination and purify the target component for dating [43]. The purified carbon was then converted into graphite targets within a vacuum system [44] and analyzed using AMS. Background correction was performed using blank samples from the same batch. Isotopic fractionation correction was applied to the measured 14C/12C ratios using online δ13C values obtained from AMS, based on the isotope fractionation correction model. All 14C samples were analyzed at Lanzhou University. Calibrated ages were obtained using the OxCal 4.4 (https://c14.arch.ox.ac.uk/oxcal/OxCal.html, accessed on 20 June 2025) with the latest IntCal20 calibration curve [45], converting conventional radiocarbon years (δ13C-corrected BP ages) into calendar years (cal BP).

3. Results

3.1. Grain Size Analysis Results

This study analyzed the sand, silt, and clay content of each sample, along with parameters such as median grain size and D90 (the grain size at which cumulative volume exceeds 90%). Variations in grain size characteristics with depth are shown in Figure 3, and parameters for different sedimentary units are summarized in Table 3.
It can be seen that although sediments from all three depositional units (mountain flood deposits, fluvial flood deposits, and lacustrine deposits) are predominantly composed of silt, notable differences exist among them. On one hand, the range of variation in grain size parameters differs significantly between sediment types. Compared to the other two units, the fluvial flood deposits exhibit the greatest variability in parameters such as median grain size, D90, and clay/silt/sand content (Table 3, Figure 3). This suggests that both the sediment sources and hydrodynamic conditions of the fluvial deposits likely varied considerably across different events or stages within the same flooding episode. In contrast, the mountain flood deposits show the smallest range of variation in these parameters, while the lacustrine deposits generally fall in between, with silt content exhibiting the least variability among all.
On the other hand, the mean values of grain size characteristics and related parameters differ among the various depositional units (Table 3, Figure 3). Fluvial flood deposits are characterized by larger median grain sizes and higher D90 values, accompanied by lower clay content and higher silt and sand content. In contrast, mountain flood deposits exhibit smaller median grain sizes and lower D90 values, with higher clay content and reduced silt and sand proportions. Lacustrine deposits generally display median grain sizes and D90 values intermediate between those of the fluvial and mountain flood deposits.
Notably, grain size characteristics also vary between flood and lake layers from different periods (Figure 3). For lacustrine deposits, Layer L2 exhibits a smaller median grain size and higher clay and sand contents compared to Layer L1. Among the fluvial flood layers, F1 has the lowest median grain size; F2 shows the highest silt content, lowest clay and sand contents, and a moderate median grain size; F3 contains the lowest silt but the highest sand content and median grain size; while grain composition of F4 is similar to F1 but with a larger median grain size.

3.2. Dating Results

3.2.1. OSL Signal Characteristics

Figure 4 shows the decay and growth curves for representative sample YC-OSL-Z1. The OSL signal decays rapidly to background levels within 1 s, indicating that fast components dominate the signal. This confirms the appropriateness of the SAR protocol [38]. The growth curve fits an exponential saturation function well, showing no evidence of saturation.
Preheating is a crucial step in determining the De values in OSL dating, as it helps remove unstable OSL signal components within quartz minerals. Before applying the single-aliquot regenerative dose (SAR) protocol to measure De values, a preheat plateau test is performed to identify the optimal preheat temperature that minimizes the influence of unstable signals. The procedure involves testing natural aliquots of each sample using the SAR protocol (Table 2), with three discs per group, each group subjected to a different preheat temperature. Preheat temperatures ranged from 160 °C to 280 °C, at 20 °C intervals. For each temperature, the average De values of the three aliquots was calculated to assess dose stability across the preheat range. For sample YC-OSL-Z1, a De plateau was observed between 200 °C and 260 °C (Figure 5), with recycling ratios between 0.9 and 1.1 and recuperation below 5%. However, the 200 °C group showed greater variability, indicating that the range of 220~260 °C is more appropriate. Consequently, 220 °C was selected as the standard preheat temperature for this study.
To evaluate the accuracy of the measurement conditions, dose recovery tests were performed on samples YC-OSL-Z1 and YC-OSL-Z10. These samples were first bleached under solar simulation for 1 h to reset their luminescence signals, then given known radiation doses and subsequently measured. The recovered De values matched the administered doses within ±10% (Table 4), demonstrating that the testing conditions were appropriate.

3.2.2. OSL Age Distribution

For each sample from the YC section, only aliquots with a recycling ratio between 0.9 and 1.1 and recuperation rates below 5% were used to calculate the De values. This selection criterion ensures accurate sensitivity correction and minimizes the influence of thermal transfer during measurements, thereby enhancing the reliability of the resulting OSL ages. The distribution of OSL ages for quartz grains of different size fractions is shown in Figure 6. All of the fine-grained quartz samples and the coarse-grained sample YC-OSL-Z9c exhibit relatively narrow and concentrated age ranges, approximating normal distributions. In contrast, coarse-grained samples YC-OSL-Z5c and YC-OSL-Z10c, as well as the medium-grained sample YC-OSL-Z6m, display wider age ranges and more dispersed distributions, each featuring a distinct secondary peak beyond the primary age peak.

3.2.3. OSL Age Results

The OSL age distribution of fine-grained quartz samples from the fluvio-lacustrine sequence at the YC section is relatively concentrated and nearly symmetrical (Figure 6), so the Common Age Model (CAM) [46] was applied for age calculation. In contrast, most medium- and coarse-grained samples exhibit more dispersed De distributions with noticeable asymmetry and distinct secondary peaks, suggesting the presence of incompletely bleached grains. To avoid influence, the Minimum Age Model (MAM) [46] was also applied to the medium- and coarse-grained samples alongside the Common Age Model. The De values, dose rate, and resulting OSL ages for all samples are presented in Table 5.
When applying the MAM, it is necessary to specify a parameter, σb, which represents the unexplained overdispersion in the De values beyond known measurement uncertainties. This parameter is typically set to the overdispersion (OD) value observed in well-bleached samples from a single sediment source. Previous studies report average and minimum OD values of 14% and 10%, respectively, for well-bleached fluvial sediments measured in small or medium aliquots [47]. In this study, the well-bleached coarse-grained sample YC-OSL-Z9c exhibited a notably low OD of 3.80 ± 1.10%. To assess the sensitivity of MAM age calculations to σb, we therefore applied values of 14%, 10%, and 5% when calculating MAM ages for the medium- and coarse-grained samples.
The results (Table 5) indicate that when the selected σb is smaller than the sample’s OD value, the MAM ages are lower than the CAM ages. Conversely, when σb exceeds the sample OD, the MAM ages approach the CAM ages but exhibit larger uncertainties. For the coarse-grained samples YC-OSL-Z5c and YC-OSL-Z10c, as well as the medium-grained sample YC-OSL-Z6m, decreasing σb consistently results in lower De values. In contrast, for the coarse-grained sample YC-OSL-Z9c, reducing σb has minimal effect on the De value, though it does reduce its uncertainty. This difference arises because, for samples YC-OSL-Z5c, YC-OSL-Z10c, and YC-OSL-Z6m, at least two of the tested σb values are smaller than the actual OD, while for sample YC-OSL-Z9c, all tested σb values exceed the sample’s OD, thus having little influence on the modeled De.
In summary, the CAM and MAM age results for sample YC-OSL-Z9c are consistent, whereas the CAM ages for samples YC-OSL-Z5c, YC-OSL-Z10c, and YC-OSL-Z6c are significantly larger than their corresponding MAM ages. The OSL ages of fine-grained samples increase with burial depth (Figure 6), aligning with stratigraphic expectations within error margins. When applying the MAM to medium- and coarse-grained samples using σb = 10%, the resulting ages generally agree well with those of the fine-grained samples, also within the margin of error.

3.2.4. 14C Age Results

14C ages were obtained for samples collected from the top of the lacustrine layers using AMS. The results are presented in Figure 6 and Table 6. The 14C ages of the organic matter sample (YC-14C-2) and the silty clay sample (YC-14C-2-2) from the same depth are consistent, and the 14C dating data from different layer match the stratigraphy, indicating that the 14C age results of each sample in this section are relatively reliable.

4. Discussion

4.1. Comparison of 14C and OSL Ages of Lacustrine Sediments

Both organic matter and sediments from lacustrine deposits were dated by using the 14C dating method. A potential issue with 14C dating for organic matter is whether the samples can represent the age of the stratum they are in [2]. In this paper, sample YC-14C-2 was taken from a thin organic matter layer at the top of Lacustrine Layer 2, which primarily consists of mainly of gray–black silty clay. This layer is well-preserved, undisturbed, and exhibits distinct depositional contact with the overlying fluvial layer (Figure 2d). It is inferred that a large number of organisms were rapidly buried due to external events (e.g., river flooding), leading to the formation of an in situ organic matter layer likely reflecting the local depositional age. The main challenge for 14C dating of sediments is the influence of the carbon reservoir effect, potentially causing age overestimation [3]. In this paper, the consistency between the 14C ages of the organic matter sample (YC-14C-2) and the clay sample (YC-14C-2-2) from the same depth suggests that the reservoir effect can be ignored. It should be noted that all 14C samples in this paper were collected from the top of lacustrine sediment layers rapidly covered by fluvial sediments, so the 14C ages can represent the age of ancient lake extinction well.
The OSL dating of lacustrine sediments in this study primarily utilized fine-grained quartz samples. The OSL age distributions for these samples are relatively concentrated, exhibiting low OD values, with the highest being only 2.04%, indicating a relatively uniform degree of bleaching. Previous studies have demonstrated that fine quartz grains suspended in water tend to have lower residual doses [16], suggesting that fine particles suspended and slowly deposited in lacustrine environments are generally well bleached.
OSL and 14C ages of lacustrine sediments have be compared. The OSL age of sample YC-OSL-Z1 from Lacustrine Layer 2 is 1.1 ± 0.1 ka, which agrees well with 14C ages from both organic matter (YC-14C-2) and silty clay (YC-14C-2-2) from the same stratigraphic horizon. The OSL age of the sample YC-OSL-Z7 from lacustrine layer 1 is 7.3 ± 0.4 ka, while the 14C age of the sample YC-14C-1 from the top of the layer is 4855~4966 cal a BP. The OSL ages of YC-OSL-Z7 and YC-OSL-Z8 suggest a slow sedimentation rate of approximately 0.13 m/ka, and using this rate, the OSL ages are consistent with the 14C results.

4.2. OSL Signal Bleaching Efficiency of Quartz in Different Grain Sizes of River Sediments

Studies have shown that well-bleached samples typically exhibit concentrated De distributions, whereas partially bleached samples display broader and more dispersed De distributions [8]. Thus, the spread of De values can be used to assess whether the luminescence signal was fully reset prior to burial.
The OD value serves as a useful indicator of the spread of De values [46] and, to some extent, reflects the uniformity of bleaching [8]. The OD values for fine-grained samples are all less than 3.76%, whereas those for medium- and coarse-grained samples range from 3.80% to 31.31%, significantly higher than the fine-grained counterparts. Although small aliquots used for medium and coarse grains contain fewer quartz grains than the large aliquots used for fine grains—resulting in more dispersed De values due to reduced averaging [47]—the observed variation in OD among samples still indicates incomplete bleaching of medium- and coarse-grained grains. Specifically, coarse-grained samples YC-OSL-Z5c and YC-OSL-Z10c, along with medium-grained sample YC-OSL-Z6m, exhibit OD values ranging from 12% to 32%, exceeding OD values typical for well-bleached fluvial sediments [47], suggesting partial bleaching. In contrast, the De distribution for coarse-grained sample YC-OSL-Z9c is normally distributed with an OD of only 3.8%, indicating effective bleaching.
While De distribution and OD values are useful for assessing the degree of bleaching, they can also be influenced by other factors such as microdosimetry effects, variations in luminescence sensitivity, and experimental uncertainties [48,49]. Therefore, additional indicators are necessary for a comprehensive assessment of bleaching completeness. Previous studies have demonstrated that, for well-bleached grains, the natural OSL signal intensity normalized by the test dose (Ln/Tn) should theoretically show no correlation with the De value. In contrast, incompletely bleached grains retain residual OSL signals at deposition, resulting in elevated Ln/Tn values that positively correlate with De values [48,50]. Consequently, examining the relationship between De and Ln/Tn values offers an alternative and complementary method for evaluating bleaching completeness.
Figure 7 illustrates the relationship between De and Ln/Tn value for the medium- and coarse-grained samples from the YC section. Samples YC-OSL-Z5c, YC-OSL-Z10c, and YC-OSL-Z6m exhibit a clear positive correlation between De and Ln/Tn value, indicating incomplete bleaching. In contrast, YC-OSL-Z9c shows no such correlation, suggesting that its grains were well bleached. Overall, the samples with dispersed OSL age distributions and high OD values (Figure 6) also display positive De–Ln/Tn correlations (Figure 7), supporting the conclusion that the broad De distributions are primarily due to incomplete bleaching.
The results of this study indicate that the coarse-grained sample YC-OSL-Z9c experienced sufficient bleaching. Grain size analysis shows that this sample has the lowest median grain size among all fluvial OSL samples (Figure 3), suggesting weak hydrodynamic conditions during deposition [51]. Previous research has demonstrated that under such low-energy conditions, quartz grains are more likely to be well bleached due to reduced turbidity, which enhances sunlight exposure [8,52]. Therefore, the effective bleaching observed in YC-OSL-Z9c is likely a result of these low-energy flow conditions and clearer water, which facilitated greater solar exposure during transport and deposition.
In this study, the OSL signals of fine-grained quartz from the fluvial sediments were found to be relatively well bleached, whereas most medium- and coarse-grained quartz samples showed signs of partial bleaching prior to burial. Several factors may explain this difference: (1) Fine-grained sediments likely originate from more distant sources, resulting in longer transport times that allow greater exposure to sunlight and more complete bleaching. In contrast, medium- and coarse-grained particles tend to settle more rapidly in the water column, shortening their transport duration and reducing their opportunity for sufficient solar exposure, thus leading to incomplete bleaching during fluvial transport [53,54]. (2) Fine particles can remain suspended in the water column for extended periods, increasing their sunlight exposure and promoting more effective bleaching. Conversely, coarser grains settle more quickly on the riverbed. Under low-energy hydrodynamic conditions, water turbidity is lower, allowing more sunlight to penetrate to the riverbed and enabling even coarser grains to bleach reasonably well. However, during stronger hydrodynamic events, increased suspended sediment load raises turbidity, reducing sunlight penetration and limiting the bleaching of coarser particles transported along or near the bed [5,20].

4.3. Differences in Quartz OSL Bleaching Efficiency of Fluvial Sediments Across Different Periods

According to the OSL dating results (Figure 6 and Figure 8), fluvial sediments between 660 and 1085 cm depth (before 1 ka) in the YC section exhibit well-bleached fine-grained quartz. Although medium- and coarse-grained quartz often show signs of partial bleaching, applying the MAM to small aliquots produces ages consistent with those from fine-grained samples, indicating that well-bleached grains can still be isolated. However, in the upper part of the section (above 660 cm, corresponding to sediments deposited after 1 ka, Figure 8), despite coarse grains exhibiting better bleaching than fine grains, MAM results from small aliquots still show significant overestimation—some samples even yield ages older than those from ~5 ka layers [22]. This suggests incomplete bleaching of the OSL signal in sediments deposited after 1 ka.
The temporal difference in bleaching efficiency can be largely attributed to changes in sediment sources. During the early to middle Holocene (e.g., around 4~5 ka), the Yellow River flowed through the Daluze region via the Shan-Jing and Yugong Rivers [55], as supported by sedimentary evidence from the HSC-01 section (Figure 1) [26]. Consequently, fluvial sediments deposited during this period were likely sourced from the Yellow River. Fine grains experienced long-distance transport, allowing for thorough bleaching, while coarse grains may have included more locally derived sediments, with shorter transport and therefore poorer bleaching. After 1 ka, the Yellow River ceased to flow through this area. Instead, frequent flooding from rivers in the Haihe Basin [56,57] supplied abundant proximal sediments. Moreover, extensive deforestation in the Taihang Mountains since the Tang and especially the Northern Song Dynasties led to severe soil erosion, as indicated by increased tree pollen in Daluze sediments [31] and the occurrence of mountain flood layers in the section (Figure 2c). The presence of silty clay layers overlying fluvial flood deposits further supports this interpretation. These sediments likely originated from eroded hillslope soils, where fine quartz particles were aggregated, reducing their sunlight exposure and bleaching efficiency. Overall, sediments deposited after 1 ka were predominantly short-transport, proximal deposits from the Haihe Basin and mountain soils, resulting in limited bleaching for both coarse and fine grains.
On the other hand, differences in bleaching efficiency across periods are also closely linked to hydrodynamic conditions. Grain size characteristics (Figure 3) show that in the YC section, fluvial sediment layers below 660 cm (units F1 and F2) have lower median grain size, sand content, and D90 values, indicating weaker hydrodynamic energy. Under these conditions, lower water turbidity would allow both coarse and fine particles to receive sufficient sunlight exposure, thereby enhancing bleaching efficiency. In contrast, fluvial layers above 660 cm (units F3 and F4) exhibit higher median grain size, sand content, and D90 values, reflecting stronger hydrodynamic forces. These conditions are generally accompanied by increased turbidity, which limits sunlight penetration and reduces the bleaching effectiveness for both fine-grained and coarse-grained quartz.
Beyond the current study, similar observations were reported by [9] for Holocene sediments in the Yangtze River Delta. It was concluded that sediments deposited before approximately 2 ka experienced more stable environmental conditions, weaker hydrodynamic forces, and better bleaching of OSL signals. However, since around 2 ka, stronger hydrodynamics and increased water turbidity have led to poorer bleaching conditions. These findings suggest that fluvial sedimentation processes in the eastern Chinese plains underwent significant changes around 1~2 ka. On one hand, Holocene climatic records indicate an increasingly arid climate since about 1~2 ka, with most lakes in the plains shrinking or disappearing during the late Holocene [58]. The loss of these lacustrine buffers diminished their regulatory effect on surface runoff, thus increasing river flow energy. On the other hand, archaeological and historical evidence shows that human activity intensified markedly during this period [59], especially through extensive deforestation, which led to enhanced soil erosion and the reworking of older sedimentary materials by river systems.

4.4. Implication of OSL Dating for Fluvial Sediments in Plain Areas

Based on the results from the fluvio-lacustrine sediments in the Daluze area of Hebei, this study recommends that OSL dating of fluvial sediments should preferably be carried out on sections where fluvial layers are bounded above and below by stable sedimentary units, such as paleosols or lacustrine deposits. Sampling multiple stratigraphic levels for dating is advised. Fluvial deposits enclosed between stable sedimentary units are easier to identify [60,61], and their age results are less likely to be influenced by later disturbances such as bioturbation or hydraulic reworking. Additionally, these layers, which are rich in organic matter, can be dated using radiocarbon (14C) methods, allowing cross-verification with OSL ages [62] and providing stronger chronological control for the fluvial units [10].
Under weaker hydrodynamic conditions and with more distal sediment sources, fine-grained quartz is often well bleached. Although some medium- and coarse- grained quartz may be incompletely bleached, reliable age estimates can still be obtained using the MAM. In this study, applying a σb value of 10% for small aliquots of partially bleached medium- and coarse-grained quartz produced OSL ages generally consistent with those from fine-grained samples. Considering uncertainties, the typical OD for medium- and coarse-grained quartz is also around 10% [63].
It is important to note that previous studies in both the lower Yellow River Daluze region [22] and the Yangtze River Delta [9] have found that incomplete bleaching is common across all quartz grain sizes in fluvial sediments deposited since 1~2 ka, often resulting in overestimated OSL ages. Therefore, when dating late Holocene fluvial sediments in the eastern plains in China, the potential for age overestimation due to incomplete bleaching must be carefully considered. Specifically, fine-grained quartz sometimes yields older OSL ages than coarse grains because of the erosion and re-deposition of older soil layers from surrounding mountains during strong water flow events, leading to significant age overestimation, as much as 10 ka [22]. In contrast, coarse-grained quartz analyzed with small aliquots or single-grain using MAM tends to produce more reliable ages, with typical overestimates after 1 ka [9,22].
Overall, the bleaching behavior of quartz grains in plain-area fluvial sediments is highly complex. Spatial and temporal variations in sediment provenance, hydrodynamic conditions, and depositional processes result in significant differences in bleaching completeness across different grain sizes. Therefore, it is essential to use different-grain-size quartz to obtain dating results and discuss bleaching completeness based on both the De distribution and the relationship between De values and Ln/Tn values.

5. Conclusions

(1)
Modern soil layer, mountain flood layer, fluvial flood layer, and lacustrine layer in the YC section has been identified based on field observations of lithological characteristics and sedimentary structures, as well as laboratory grain size analysis.
(2)
For the fluvial sediments deposited in the early and middle Holocene, fine-grained quartz exhibits concentrated De distributions, whereas most medium-grained and coarse-grained quartz shows more dispersed De values with significant positive correlations with Ln/Tn, indicating incomplete bleaching. By applying the MAM to small aliquots, the OSL ages of medium- and coarse-grained samples align well with those of fine grains.
(3)
The OSL ages of fluvial sediments deposited before 1 ka in the YC section are relatively reliable, attributed to better bleaching of finer grains. This contrasts with fluvial sediments deposited after 1 ka in the region, which commonly show age overestimation due to incomplete bleaching, despite better bleaching efficiency in coarser grains. The variation in bleaching efficiency suggests differences in sediment source distances and depositional processes around 1 ka ago. Based on the results, for fluvial sediments in the eastern plain of China, it is recommended to strengthen the comparison of OSL dating results for different grain-size quartz, combined with appropriate analytical models.
(4)
Transitions between lacustrine and fluvial sediments have occurred in the Daluze region during the Holocene. The main periods of fluvial deposition were concentrated in three intervals: 10.8~10.2 ka, 5.3~4.7 ka, and after 1 ka.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.L. and J.Y.; methodology, Z.L. and H.Z.; validation, J.Y.; formal analysis, Z.L.; investigation, Z.L., J.Y. and L.S.; resources, H.Z., L.S. and C.W.; data curation, Z.L. and C.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.L.; writing—review and editing, J.Y.; visualization, Z.L.; supervision, J.Y. and H.Z.; project administration, J.Y. and H.Z.; funding acquisition, J.Y. and H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. U2444218, 41807428), the Basic Research Funds of Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (Nos. SK202115, YK202308), Hebei Natural Science Foundation (No. D2025504006), Fujian Natural Science Foundation (No. 2024J01206), Xiamen City Natural Science Foundation (No. 3502Z202473099), and the China Geological Survey (No. DD20230700805).

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Likang Wang for assistance with field sampling. We are grateful to the editor and anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
OSLoptically stimulated luminescence
kathousand years before the present
YCYanchi
MAMthe minimum age model
CAMthe common age model
AMSaccelerator mass spectrometry

References

  1. Macklin, M.G.; Lewin, J. Alluvial responses to the changing earth system. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2008, 33, 374–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lam, D.; Croke, J.; Thompson, C.; Sharma, A. Beyond the gorge: Palaeoflood reconstruction from slackwater deposits in a range of physiographic settings in subtropical australia. Geomorphology 2017, 292, 164–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yu, S.; Chen, X.; Cheng, P.; Chen, S.; Hou, Z. Freshwater radiocarbon reservoir age in the lower yellow river floodplain during the late Holocene. Holocene 2017, 28, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yu, S.; Li, C.; Chen, X.; Jin, G.; Fang, H. Rates of organic carbon burial in a floodplain lake of the lower yellow river area during the late Holocene. Radiocarbon 2014, 56, 1129–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rittenour, T.M. Luminescence dating of fluvial deposits: Applications to geomorphic, palaeoseismic and archaeological research. Boreas 2008, 37, 613–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Thrasher, I.M.; Mauz, B.; Chiverrell, R.C.; Lang, A. Luminescence dating of glaciofluvial deposits: A review. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2009, 97, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. He, Z.; Long, H.; Yang, L.; Zhou, J. Luminescence dating of a fluvial sequence using different grain size fractions and implications on Holocene flooding activities in Weihe basin, central China. Quat. Geochronol. 2019, 49, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Smedley, R.K.; Skirrow, G.K.A. Luminescence dating in fluvial settings: Overcoming the challenge of partial bleaching. In Palaeohydrology. Geography of the Physical Environment; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nian, X.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Z.; Sun, Q.; Chen, Z. Inter-comparison of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages between different fractions of Holocene deposits from the Yangtze delta and its environmental implications. Mar. Geol. 2021, 432, 106401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Perilla-Castillo, P.J.; Driese, S.G.; Horn, S.P.; Rittenour, T.M.; Nelson, M.S.; Mckay, L.D. Using soil micromorphology to assess the reliability of radiocarbon and osl dating of fluvial deposits. Phys. Geogr. 2023, 44, 710–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Breda, C.; Pupim, F.N.; Cruz, C.B.L.; Souza, P.E.; Monsalve, G.; Cardona, A.; Sawakuchi, A.O.; Parra, M. Variation in the ITCZ position controls the evolution of the piedmont landscape of the tropical Andes (Colombia) during the late Quaternary. Geomorphology 2024, 462, 109333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fuchs, M.; Fischer, M.; Reverman, R. Colluvial and alluvial sediment archives temporally resolved by OSL dating: Implications for reconstructing soil erosion. Quat. Geochronol. 2010, 5, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rizza, M.; Rixhon, G.; Valla, P.G.; Gairoard, S.; Delanghe, D.; Fleury, J.; Tal, M.; Groleau, S. Revisiting a proof of concept in quartz-OSL bleaching processes using sands from a modern-day river (the Séveraisse, French Alps). Quat. Geochronol. 2024, 82, 101520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Madsen, A.T.; Murray, A.S.; Sukamoto, S.; Duller, G.A.T.; Murray, A.S.; Choi, J. Optically stimulated luminescence dating of young sediments; A review. Geomorphology 2009, 109, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, J.C.; Chang, T.S.; Yi, S.; Hong, S.S.; Nahm, W. OSL dating of coastal sediments from the southwestern Korean peninsula: A comparison of different size fractions of quartz. Quat. Int. 2015, 384, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hu, G.; Zhang, J.; Qiu, W.; Zhou, L. Residual osl signals in modern fluvial sediments from the Yellow river (Huanghe) and the implications for dating young sediments. Quat. Geochronol. 2010, 5, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Thompson, J.A.; Chen, J.; Yang, H.; Li, T.; Bookhagen, B.; Burbank, D. Coarse- versus fine-grain quartz OSL and cosmogenic 10Be dating of deformed fluvial terraces on the northeast Pamir margin, northwest China. Quat. Geochronol. 2018, 46, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ishii, Y.; Tamura, T.; Collins, D.S.; Ben, B. Applicability of osl dating to fine-grained fluvial deposits in the Mekong river floodplain, Cambodia. Geochronometria 2021, 48, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chamberlain, E.L.; Wallinga, J.; Reimann, T.; Goodbred, S.L.; Steckler, M.S.; Shen, Z.; Sincavage, R. Luminescence dating of delta sediments; Novel approaches explored for the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna delta. Quat. Geochronol. 2017, 41, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gray, H.J.; Mahan, S.A. Variables and potential models for the bleaching of luminescence signals in fluvial environments. Quat. Int. 2015, 362, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Y.; Sun, X.; Liu, Y.; Pei, Y. Timing of fluvial sedimentation in the Baiyangdian catchment, North China Plain, since the late Pleistocene by multiple luminescence dating approaches. Quat. Geochronol. 2024, 83, 101589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, H.; Liu, Z.; Song, L.; Wang, C.; Li, S. Osl dating of flood sediments in the North China Plain. Quat. Geochronol. 2019, 49, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, S.; Miao, X.; Shi, T. Flood events in the lower reaches of the Yellow river: OSL and radiocarbon dating on the Anshang site. Quat. Int. 2024, 694, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Du, T.; Zhang, W.; Li, B.; Liu, L.; Li, Y.; Ge, Y.; Yu, S. Sedimentary evidence for the diversion of the yellow river onto the North China Plain 3000–2600 years ago. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2024, 634, 111909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shi, C. On the impact factors of the evolution of the Daluze and Ningjinpo Lakes during 15th to 20th century. J. Lake Sci. 2007, 19, 522–529. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ru, T.; Yang, L.; Wei, G.; Li, X.; Hou, Z.; Chen, Y.; Chen, S. Mainstream migration events of the yellow river and anthropogenic responses during the mid-Holocene. Quat. Int. 2024, 685, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, C.; Guo, S. Age dating of lacustrine deposits in the Ningjinbo area, Shijiazhuang, North China Plain. Geol. Bull. China 2005, 24, 655–659. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, W.; Li, B.; Fan, B.; Li, Y.; Xu, Q.; Wang, S.; Zhang, N.; Yang, J.; Fu, Y.; Ding, G. Reconstruction of Holocene precipitation patterns and vegetation evolution in the North China Plain: Deciphering the relative influence of climate and anthropogenic forcing. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2024, 638, 112020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, B.; Zhang, W.; Fyfe, R.; Fan, B.; Wang, S.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, N.; Ding, G.; Yang, J.; Li, Y. High-resolution quantitative vegetation reconstruction in the North China Plain during the early-to-middle Holocene using the reveals model. Catena 2024, 234, 107577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, M.; Yang, S.; Xiao, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, X.; Zhang, S.; Yang, X.; Jiang, W.; Ding, Z. Brgdgts-based temperature and hydrological reconstruction from fluvio-lacustrine sediments in the monsoonal North China Plain since 31 kyr bp. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2022, 277, 107268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, B.; Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Xu, Q.; Ge, Y.; Fan, B.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, N.; Xie, M. Quantitative vegetation reconstruction in the central North China Plain of the last 3000 years based on the reveals model. Quat. Int. 2022, 641, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, C.; Li, B.; Li, Y.; Chen, B.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, W.; Liu, W.; Ding, G. Variation of summer monsoon intensity in the North China Plain and its response to abrupt climatic events during the early-middle Holocene. Quat. Int. 2020, 550, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, W.; Fan, B.; Li, Y.; Xu, Q.; Li, B.; Ding, G.; Zhang, J. Pollen record of precipitation changes during the younger dryas and early Holocene in the North China Plain. Quat. Int. 2019, 532, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, M.; Zhang, S.; Xu, Q.; Xiao, J.; Wen, R. Spatial patterns of vegetation and climate in the North China Plain during the last glacial maximum and Holocene climatic optimum. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2019, 62, 1279–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, G.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, H.; Jia, Q. Paleoclimatic variations in ningjinpo area since late Pleistocene as indicated by n-Alkanes. Earth Sci. J. China Univ. Geosci. 2018, 43, 4001–4007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, J.; Liu, Z.; Yin, J.; Tang, L.; Zhao, H.; Song, L.; Zhang, P. Paleoflood reconstruction in the lower yellow river floodplain (China) based on sediment grain size and chemical composition. Water 2023, 15, 4268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yu, S.; Hou, Z.; Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Song, Y.; Gao, M.; Pan, J.; Sun, M.; Fang, H.; Han, J.; et al. Extreme flooding of the lower yellow river near the northgrippian-meghalayan boundary: Evidence from the shilipu archaeological site in southwestern Shandong province, China. Geomorphology 2020, 350, 106878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wintle, A.G.; Murray, A.S. A review of quartz optically stimulated luminescence characteristics and their relevance in single-aliquot regeneration dating protocols. Radiat. Meas. 2006, 41, 369–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Adamiec, G.; Aitken, M. Dose-rate conversion factors: Update. Anc. TL 1998, 16, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Prescott, J.R.; Hutton, J.T. Cosmic ray contributions to dose rates for luminescence and esr dating: Large depths and long-term time variations. Radiat. Meas. 1994, 23, 497–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aitken, M.J.; Xie, J. Moisture correction for annual gamma dose. Anc. TL 1990, 8, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Durcan, J.A.; King, G.E.; Duller, G.A.T. Drac: Dose rate and age calculator for trapped charge dating. Quat. Geochronol. 2015, 28, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dunbar, E.; Cook, G.T.; Naysmith, P.; Tripney, B.G.; Xu, S. AMS 14C dating at the scottish universities environmental research centre (suerc) radiocarbon dating laboratory. Radiocarbon 2016, 58, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, S.; Kong, X.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Q.; Yin, X.; Guo, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Yua, B. Radiocarbon sample preparation based on the flam-sealed Zn/Fe reduction method in accelerator mass spectrometry analysis. At. Spectrosc. 2022, 43, 412–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Paula, J.; Reimer, W.E.N.A. The intcal20 northern hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 2020, 62, 725–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Galbraith, R.F.; Roberts, R.G.; Laslett, G.M.; Yoshida, H.; Olley, J.M. Optical dating of single and multiple grains of quartz from jinmium rock shelter, northern Australia: Part i, experimental design and statistical models. Archaeometry 1999, 41, 339–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Arnold, L.J.; Roberts, R.G. Stochastic modelling of multi-grain equivalent dose (de) distributions; Implications for osl dating of sediment mixtures. Quat. Geochronol. 2009, 4, 204–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, J.F.; Zhou, L.P.; Yue, S.Y. Dating fluvial sediments by optically stimulated luminescence: Selection of equivalent doses for age calculation. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2003, 22, 1123–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Peng, J.; Li, B.; Jacobs, Z. Modelling heterogeneously bleached single-grain equivalent dose distributions: Implications for the reliability of burial dose determination. Quat. Geochronol. 2020, 60, 101108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, S. Identification of well-bleached grains in the optical dating of quartz. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2001, 20, 1365–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dade, W.B.; Friend, P.F. Grain-size, sediment-transport regime, and channel slope in alluvial rivers. J. Geol. 1998, 106, 661–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sugisaki, S.; Buylaert, J.; Murray, A.; Tada, R.; Zheng, H.; Ke, W.; Saito, K.; Chao, L.; Li, S.; Irino, T. Osl dating of fine-grained quartz from Holocene yangtze delta sediments. Quat. Geochronol. 2015, 30, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bailey, R.M.; Singarayer, J.S.; Ward, S.; Stokes, S. Identification of partial resetting using De as a function of illumination time. Radiat. Meas. 2003, 37, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Stokes, S.; Bray, H.E.; Blum, M.D. Optical resetting in large drainage basins: Tests of zeroing assumptions using single-aliquot procedures. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2001, 20, 879–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, S.; Ma, Y.; Chen, F.; Liu, J.; Chen, F.; Lu, S.; Jiang, L.; Li, D. A new method for supporting interpretation of paleochannels in a large scale-detrended digital elevation model interpretation. Geomorphology 2020, 369, 107374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lyu, J.; Hao, Z.; Wu, M.; Ge, Q. Tracking the warning signal of extreme rainstorm and flood events in haihe river basin through historical documents. Anthropocene 2025, 50, 100471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, Y.; Yang, G.; Yao, C. Characteristics and motivations of drought and flood variability in the northern haihe river basin over the past 500 years. Water 2025, 17, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, N.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, S.; Yang, X.; Wang, D.; Sun, Y.; Wang, T. Climatic and environmental evolution of the baiyangdian area since the lateglacial. Dili Xuebao/Acta Geogr. Sin. 2022, 77, 1195–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, X.; Dodson, J.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, X. Increases of population and expansion of rice agriculture in asia, and anthropogenic methane emissions since 5000 BP. Quat. Int. 2009, 202, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, F.; Gao, H.; Li, Z.; Huang, C.; Xi, Z.; Xue, Y. Geochronological and sedimentological study of the fluvio-lacustrine deposits from Shigu to Longjie: Implications for the evolution of the lower jinsha river since the early Pleistocene. Water 2023, 15, 3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tabor, N.J.; Myers, T.S. Paleosols as indicators of paleoenvironment and paleoclimate. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2015, 43, 333–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Long, H.; Lai, Z.; Wang, N.; Zhang, J. A combined luminescence and radiocarbon dating study of Holocene lacustrine sediments from arid northern China. Quat. Geochronol. 2011, 6, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Galbraith, R.F.; Roberts, R.G.; Yoshida, H. Error variation in osl palaeodose estimates from single aliquots of quartz: A factorial experiment. Radiat. Meas. 2005, 39, 289–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the study area and the sampling sites.
Figure 1. Location of the study area and the sampling sites.
Water 17 01942 g001
Figure 2. Lithologic histogram and field photo of YC section. (a) Sedimentary characteristics of modern soil layer. (b) Sedimentary characteristics of river flood deposits: interbedding of silt and clayey silt layers. (c) Sedimentary characteristics of mountain flood and the comparison with river flood deposits. (d) Sedimentary characteristics of lacustrine deposits and the comparison with river flood deposits.
Figure 2. Lithologic histogram and field photo of YC section. (a) Sedimentary characteristics of modern soil layer. (b) Sedimentary characteristics of river flood deposits: interbedding of silt and clayey silt layers. (c) Sedimentary characteristics of mountain flood and the comparison with river flood deposits. (d) Sedimentary characteristics of lacustrine deposits and the comparison with river flood deposits.
Water 17 01942 g002
Figure 3. Grain size characteristics of YC section. Md represent the median grain size. The legend of right-side background colors is as follows: light orange for modern soil layer, light yellow for fluvial flood layers, light pink for mountain flood layers, and light blue for lacustrine layers.
Figure 3. Grain size characteristics of YC section. Md represent the median grain size. The legend of right-side background colors is as follows: light orange for modern soil layer, light yellow for fluvial flood layers, light pink for mountain flood layers, and light blue for lacustrine layers.
Water 17 01942 g003
Figure 4. Bleaching curve of OSL signal and growth curve for sample YC-OSL-Z1.
Figure 4. Bleaching curve of OSL signal and growth curve for sample YC-OSL-Z1.
Water 17 01942 g004
Figure 5. Results of preheat plateau test.
Figure 5. Results of preheat plateau test.
Water 17 01942 g005
Figure 6. OSL age distributions for samples of YC section.
Figure 6. OSL age distributions for samples of YC section.
Water 17 01942 g006
Figure 7. Relationship between De and corrected natural OSL intensity for medium (m)/coarse (c) grain quartz from samples of YC section. The red dashed lines indicate trend of De versus Ln/Tn.
Figure 7. Relationship between De and corrected natural OSL intensity for medium (m)/coarse (c) grain quartz from samples of YC section. The red dashed lines indicate trend of De versus Ln/Tn.
Water 17 01942 g007
Figure 8. Variations in OSL signal bleaching efficiency of quartz grains from fluvial sediments in the YC section during different Holocene periods and their influencing factors. (a) Dating results. OSL dating results of sediments above 660 cm were modified from [22]. (b) After 1 ka, hydrodynamic force was strong, water turbidity was high, and sediments were mainly mountain soil and near-source fluvial deposits, resulting in low bleaching efficiency of quartz OSL signal. (c) Before 1 ka, hydrodynamic force was weak, water turbidity was low, and sediments were mainly far-source fluvial and near-source fluvial deposits, so the quartz OSL signal could be bleached relatively well.
Figure 8. Variations in OSL signal bleaching efficiency of quartz grains from fluvial sediments in the YC section during different Holocene periods and their influencing factors. (a) Dating results. OSL dating results of sediments above 660 cm were modified from [22]. (b) After 1 ka, hydrodynamic force was strong, water turbidity was high, and sediments were mainly mountain soil and near-source fluvial deposits, resulting in low bleaching efficiency of quartz OSL signal. (c) Before 1 ka, hydrodynamic force was weak, water turbidity was low, and sediments were mainly far-source fluvial and near-source fluvial deposits, so the quartz OSL signal could be bleached relatively well.
Water 17 01942 g008
Table 1. Lithology and sedimentary unit of YC section.
Table 1. Lithology and sedimentary unit of YC section.
Sedimentary UnitLayer No.Depth (cm)Lithological Description
Modern soil layer (S)230~30Light brown soil, with plant roots and root holes
Fluvial Flood Layer 4 (F4)2230~60Reddish-brown silty clay with shell fragments
2160~115Gray–yellow silt; 95~100 cm is brown–yellow clayey silt
20115~150Light brown–yellow clayey silt; reddish-brown at 115~125 cm
19150~330Gray–yellow silt
18330~340Interbedded reddish-brown silty clay and gray–yellow clayey silt
17340~380Interbedded brown clayey silt and brown–yellow silt
16380~420Brown silty clay with greasy luster; bluish-gray at ~395 cm
Mountain flood Layer (M)15420~510Dark brown silty clay, blocky and structureless
Fluvial Flood Layer 3 (F3)14510~525Bluish-gray clayey silt with shell fragments
13525~535Gray–yellow silt
12535~555Brown–yellow clayey silt
11555~620Gray–yellow silt
10620~630Bluish-gray silt
9630~660Brown silty clay
Lacustrine Layer 2 (L2)8660~710Gray–black silty clay with shell fragments; carbonaceous debris at 660 cm
Fluvial Flood Layer 2 (F2)7710~745Brown–yellow clayey silt
6745~920Gray–yellow silt
5920~926Brownish clayey silt
Lacustrine Layer 1 (L1)4926~970Gray–black silty clay
Fluvial Flood Layer 1 (F1)3970~1020Gray–yellow silt; coarsens downward, transitional contact
21020~1060Brown clayey silt with calcareous nodules
11060~1085Brown–yellow fine sand, well sorted; large shells at base
Table 2. Protocol for SAR method.
Table 2. Protocol for SAR method.
StepProcedure
1Give regenerative dose Di, for the natural sample Di = 0
2Preheat for 10 s at 220 °C (determined by preheat plateau test)
3Stimulate for 70 s at 125 °C to measure signal Li (Ln for natural sample)
4Give test dose (DT)
5Cutheat to 160 °C, 0 s hold
6Stimulate for 70 s at 125 °C to measure signal Ti (Tn for natural sample)
7Return to 1
Table 3. Statistical parameters of grain size characteristics for fluvial flood layer, mountain flood layer, and lacustrine layer in YC section.
Table 3. Statistical parameters of grain size characteristics for fluvial flood layer, mountain flood layer, and lacustrine layer in YC section.
Sediment TypeValue TypeMedian Grain Size (μm)D90Content (%)
ClaySiltSand
Fluvial Flood LayerMaximum123.08259.6153.3999.8880.01
Minimum3.719.220.0017.060.00
Average24.6658.3616.4071.7311.87
Mountain Flood LayerMaximum5.4825.0666.4765.424.38
Minimum2.986.5934.5833.530.00
Average3.8811.0852.3547.040.61
Lacustrine LayerMaximum41.56130.8041.8584.1523.39
Minimum5.0823.285.0257.550.60
Average14.6049.8420.9072.846.26
Table 4. Results of dose recovery experiments.
Table 4. Results of dose recovery experiments.
Sample No.Given Dose (Gy)Measured De (Gy)
YC-OSL-Z133.03 ± 0.24
YC-OSL-Z166.04 ± 0.36
YC-OSL-Z102019.94 ± 0.81
YC-OSL-Z104041.61 ± 1.69
Table 5. Equivalent doses (De), annual doses, and OSL ages of OSL samples.
Table 5. Equivalent doses (De), annual doses, and OSL ages of OSL samples.
Sample No.Depth
(m)
U
(ppm)
Th
(ppm)
K
(%)
De (Gy)Dose Rate
(Gy/ka)
Water Content
(%)
Age(ka)ODGrain Size
(μm)
Common Age ModelMinimum Age ModelCommon Age ModelMinimum Age Model(%)
YC-OSL-Z16.74.5616.82.265.03 ± 0.04 4.45 ± 0.2823 ± 51.1 ± 0.1 0.694~11
YC-OSL-Z27.02.2615.42.4012.23 ± 0.19 3.84 ± 0.2223 ± 53.2 ± 0.2 2.044~11
YC-OSL-Z37.42.0912.092.0215.32 ± 0.25 3.26 ± 0.1822 ± 54.7 ± 0.3 3.274~11
YC-OSL-Z5f8.31.828.501.7313.94 ± 0.17 2.66 ± 0.1522 ± 55.3 ± 0.3 3.764~11
YC-OSL-Z5c8.31.828.501.7317.17 ± 0.2712.84 ± 1.74 (σ = 14)2.29 ± 0.1022 ± 57.5 ± 0.35.6 ± 0.8 (σ = 14)31.3165~90
11.19 ± 1.49 (σ = 10) 4.9 ± 0.7 (σ = 10)
10.43 ± 1.00 (σ = 5) 4.6 ± 0.5 (σ = 5)
YC-OSL-Z6f9.14 2.32 10.70 1.57 14.28 ± 0.16 2.84 ± 0.1722 ± 55.0 ± 0.3 04~11
YC-OSL-Z6m9.14 2.32 10.70 1.57 13.36 ± 0.1412.45 ± 0.99 (σ = 14)2.55 ± 0.1122 ± 55.2 ± 0.24.9 ± 0.4 (σ = 14)16.6541~65
11.68 ± 0.82 (σ = 10) 4.6 ± 0.4 (σ = 10)
11.06 ± 0.57 (σ = 5) 4.3 ± 0.3 (σ = 5)
YC-OSL-Z79.42.2113.81.7021.22 ± 0.21 2.92 ± 0.1830 ± 57.3 ± 0.4 04~11
YC-OSL-Z89.62.3012.01.8627.63 ± 0.34 3.16 ± 0.1922 ± 58.8 ± 0.5 04~11
YC-OSL-Z9f9.81.8211.911.7730.20 ± 0.31 2.96 ± 0.1722 ± 510.2 ± 0.6 04~11
YC-OSL-Z9c9.81.8211.911.7726.58 ± 0.2126.54 ± 1.23 (σ = 14)2.49 ± 0.1022 ± 510.7 ± 0.510.7 ± 0.7 (σ = 14)3.8090~125
26.54 ± 0.68 (σ = 10) 10.7 ± 0.5 (σ = 10) 90~125
26.54 ± 0.66 (σ = 5) 10.7 ± 0.5 (σ = 5) 90~125
YC-OSL-Z10f10.61.9210.21.7230.67 ± 0.31 2.85 ± 0.1720 ± 510.8 ± 0.6 04~11
YC-OSL-Z10c10.61.9210.21.7229.77 ± 0.3029.77 ± 0.83 (σ = 14)2.41 ± 0.1020 ± 512.4 ± 0.612.4 ± 0.9 (σ = 14)12.6990~125
27.17 ± 1.80 (σ = 10)11.3 ± 0.9 (σ = 10)
25.33 ± 1.23 (σ = 5)10.5 ± 0.7 (σ = 5)
Table 6. AMS 14C dating of lacustrine sediments of the YC section in the Daluze area.
Table 6. AMS 14C dating of lacustrine sediments of the YC section in the Daluze area.
Lab No.Sample IDDepth (cm)Material14C Age (BP)2σ Calibrated Age (cal BP)Mean Cal Age (cal BP)
LZU14171YC-14C-1926~929Silty clay4350 ± 204855~49664910.5
LZU14170YC-14C-2660Organic matter1070 ± 20927~997962
LZU14170-1YC-14C-2-2660Silty clay1145 ± 25963~10801021.5
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Z.; Yang, J.; Zhao, H.; Song, L.; Wang, C. Luminescence Dating of Holocene Fluvial Sediments from the Daluze Area in the North China Plain. Water 2025, 17, 1942. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131942

AMA Style

Liu Z, Yang J, Zhao H, Song L, Wang C. Luminescence Dating of Holocene Fluvial Sediments from the Daluze Area in the North China Plain. Water. 2025; 17(13):1942. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131942

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Zhe, Jinsong Yang, Hua Zhao, Lei Song, and Chengmin Wang. 2025. "Luminescence Dating of Holocene Fluvial Sediments from the Daluze Area in the North China Plain" Water 17, no. 13: 1942. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131942

APA Style

Liu, Z., Yang, J., Zhao, H., Song, L., & Wang, C. (2025). Luminescence Dating of Holocene Fluvial Sediments from the Daluze Area in the North China Plain. Water, 17(13), 1942. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131942

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop