Next Article in Journal
Analyses on Characteristics of Spatial Distribution and Matching of the Human–Land–Water–Heat System on the Yunnan Plateau
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Emission Patterns in Different Water Levels in Peatlands
Previous Article in Journal
Joint Failure Probability of Dams Based on Probabilistic Flood Hazard Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Treatment Wetland Plant Harvests as a Tool for Soil Phosphorus Reduction in North Central US Agricultural Watersheds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Stocks and Sources of Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in Non-Native Kandelia obovata Afforestation and Spartina alterniflora Invasion: A Case Study on Northern Margin Mangroves in the Subtropical Coastal Wetlands of China

1
School of Fishery, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China
2
College of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China
3
School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
4
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture, Protection and Utilization, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou 510520, China
5
Iowa Nutrient Research Center, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
6
Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Water 2024, 16(6), 866; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16060866
Submission received: 15 January 2024 / Revised: 26 February 2024 / Accepted: 11 March 2024 / Published: 17 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Restoration of Wetlands for Climate Change Mitigation)

Abstract

:
For decades in China, carbon neutrality policies have spurred the establishment of northern margin mangroves as artificial blue carbon ecosystems. However, there has been limited research on the impact of plantation and invasion on the stocks and sources of soil carbon and nitrogen in rehabilitated coastal wetlands. Non-native Kandelia obovata afforestation began on Ximen Island, Zhejiang, China, where Spartina alterniflora invasion had also occurred decades ago. Soil cores were collected from both mangrove and salt marsh habitats with depths from 0 to 50 cm and were analyzed for total carbon (TC), soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and the isotope of carbon and nitrogen in sediments. The results indicated that there were no significant differences in the TC, SOC, and C/N ratio between the K. obovata and the S. alterniflora, but there were significant differences in TN, isotope δ13C, and δ15N. The SOC content of both ecosystems in the 0–20 cm layer was significantly higher than that in the 30–50 cm layer. Our study has shown that the main sources of carbon and nitrogen for mangroves and salt marshes are different, especially under the impact of external factors, such as tidal waves and aquaculture. These findings provide insight into the ecological functioning of subtropical coastal wetlands and an understanding of the biogeochemical cycles of northern margin mangrove ecosystems.

1. Introduction

Coastal wetlands are being preserved, restored, and created globally for climate mitigation, especially following the signing of the Paris Agreement [1,2]. They are recognized for their vital ecological functions, serving as critical habitats for various species, nature’s nurseries, defenses against storm surges, frontiers for protecting against coastal erosion, nutrient reservoirs, and carbon banks [3,4,5]. In addition, mangroves, which contain 10–15% of the organic carbon in the global ocean, are identified as blue carbon ecosystems, along with coastal vegetation ecosystems such as salt marshes and seagrass beds, despite accounting for only 0.5% of the world’s ocean area [6,7]. The distribution of mangroves closely aligns with temperature requirements, and historically, the cold winters in Zhejiang Province have prevented the natural establishment of mangroves [8]. Kandelia obovata, identified as the most cold-tolerant among mangrove species and representing the northernmost limit of intentionally planted mangroves, was introduced to Ximen Island, Yueqing Bay, Zhejiang Province, in 1957 [9]. After decades of trials, K. obovata has become one of the dominant surviving species. S. alterniflora was introduced for shore protection in the 1990s. Consequently, the northern margin mangrove (NMM) has been experiencing both intentional afforestation and inadvertent invasion by salt marsh plants like S. alterniflora [10]. As a mono-system, the NMM faces challenges from nature and human activities, such as climate change, typhoons, diseases, and pollution from aquaculture [8,10,11]. The invasion of S. alterniflora has emerged as one of the key issues. These activities continue to be crucial for mangrove rehabilitation, yet their effects on soil carbon and nitrogen stocks were not well understood in the past [12].
Mangroves are naturally highly efficient carbon sinks and long-term pools. Soil carbon accumulation in mangrove ecosystems is a crucial component of overall coastal carbon sequestration [13,14]. The soil surface layer plays an important role in the soil carbon pool. However, its biogeochemical cycles are impacted by environmental conditions, such as climate, invasion, and nutrient limitation. The carbon content within mangrove ecosystems primarily originates from upstream river inflow, precipitation, and marine tidal influences [7,15]. The intricate root systems of mangroves play a pivotal role in sequestering carbon, effectively serving as carbon reservoirs [16]. Simultaneously, mangroves act as food sources, supplying substantial organic matter and nutrients to the surrounding biota, thereby facilitating nutrient cycling [17]. Understanding the carbon stock and sources of mangrove afforestation is key for long-term nature-based solutions, especially those targeted at climate change. Previous studies have shown that soil carbon stock decreases as latitude moves north for natural mangroves [13,16].
Like carbon, nitrogen is an indispensable key growth element within mangrove ecosystems [18]. An excess or deficiency of nitrogen, such as in eutrophic or nutrient-deficient conditions, can impede mangrove development [19]. Mangroves function as both nitrogen reservoirs and nitrogen sources, contributing to the maintenance of overall nitrogen cycling through processes like nitrogen fixation, denitrification, nitrification, anaerobic ammonium oxidation, and nitrogen mineralization [20]. Through nitrogen fixation, they can ultimately bury anthropogenic nitrogen (from sources such as aquaculture, domestic sewage, and industrial waste) in sediments for extended periods [21]. These processes are vital for sustaining mangrove productivity, ecological protection, and restoration efforts [22].
The carbon and nitrogen cycles in mangrove and salt marsh ecosystems are inextricably linked, driving the functioning and resilience of these wetlands [20]. This interplay between the two cycles is a key feature of these ecosystems and is essential to their ecological functions. Understanding these cycles is fundamental to comprehending the functioning and resilience of these critical coastal ecosystems, particularly in the context of non-native plant species and ecological changes, such as the invasion of S. alterniflora and afforestation with K. obovata in the subtropical coastal wetlands of China [13].
The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare soil carbon and nitrogen stocks and their sources in the topsoil of areas where non-native K. obovata afforestation and S. alterniflora invasion have occurred in the subtropical coastal wetlands of China. Specifically, this research aims to (1) assess disparities in soil carbon and nitrogen stocks between K. obovata afforestation areas and S. alterniflora-invaded regions; (2) identify the primary sources contributing to these stocks in each type of area. By addressing these research aims, this study endeavors to advance our understanding of how different vegetation types influence biogeochemical cycles. The outcomes hold the potential to inform mangrove conservation and rehabilitation strategies, not only in China but also in regions undergoing analogous ecological transitions [23].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Yueqing Bay, located on the northern fringes of the Oujiang River estuary in southern Zhejiang, China (27°5′–28°23′ N, 120°57′–121°16′ E), is characterized by its exceptional natural surroundings, which have facilitated the development of marine aquaculture as one of the major economic sectors in the area [24] (Figure 1). As a semi-enclosed tidal bay, Yueqing Bay is significantly influenced by tidal dynamics, exhibiting a maximum tidal range of 8.34 m and an average tidal range of 4.2 m. This bay is subject to a subtropical maritime monsoon climate, featuring an average annual temperature of 17.9 °C, average annual precipitation of 1556.3 mm, and an average annual frost-free period of 258 days (http://www.yueqing.gov.cn/, accessed on 15 August 2023).
Ximen Island (28°20’ N, 121°10’ E), located in the northern region of Yueqing Bay within Yueqing City, Zhejiang Province, was designated as the first national marine special reserve in Zhejiang Province in 2005. Since 2006, it has received significant national funding aimed at the plantation and rehabilitation of mangroves. According to data from the Zhejiang Provincial Forestry Bureau, the Zhejiang Provincial Government has invested RMB 7.6668 million in the “Ximen Island Mangrove Transplantation Project”, which was completed in 2013 and 2015. The mangrove species K. obovata, introduced from Fujian Province on five occasions, now covers approximately 5% of the coastal wetlands on the island [25]. However, since 1999, S. alterniflora has expanded rapidly in Yueqing Bay, dominating most of the mudflats on Ximen Island [26]. Consequently, clearing S. alterniflora and planting and protecting mangroves have emerged as significant conservation tasks in this area. Currently, both K. obovata and S. alterniflora coexist in the intertidal zone of Ximen Island, necessitating a comprehensive examination of their soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics.

2.2. Soil Sampling and Analysis

In May 2021, soil sampling was conducted in both the K. obovata mangrove area and the S. alterniflora salt marsh area on Ximen Island. At each sampling site, three replicate 1 m × 1 m sampling plots were established randomly with a minimum separation of 100 m between plots. Surface litter was removed from each site before collecting six soil cores, each with a depth of 50 cm and diameter of 5 cm, using Russian Sediment/Peat Borer. The cores were then sectioned into seven layers at depths of 0–5 cm, 5–10 cm, 10–15 cm, 15–20 cm, 20–30 cm, 30–40 cm, and 40–50 cm in the field. A total of 42 soil samples were collected, placed into plastic bags, refrigerated, and transported to the laboratory.
In the laboratory, the soil samples underwent freeze-drying and were cleared of impurities such as gravel and roots. Soil samples from the same layer of three cores within the community area were mixed to create a composite sample. These composite soil samples were then ground, passed through a 100-mesh sieve, and air-dried. Total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) contents were determined using the dry combustion method (Vario PYRO cube, Elementar, Langenselbold, Germany). To analyze the soil organic carbon (SOC) content and stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes (δ13C and δ15N), inorganic carbon was removed by acidification with 1 mol L−1 hydrochloric acid, followed by drying at 60 °C. Finally, the SOC content and stable isotopes were measured using elemental analysis coupled with stable isotope mass spectrometry (Elementar isoprime100, Langenselbold, Germany). The isotopic compositions values of δ13C and δ15N were expressed as follows:
δ ( ) = R s a m p l e R standard 1 × 1000
where Rsample is the 13C/12C or 15N/14N isotope ratio of the sample, and Rstandard is the δ13C characteristic value relative to the international standard material Vienna-Pee Dee Belemnite (V-PDB) for carbon and the δ15N characteristic value relative to atmospheric nitrogen for nitrogen. The C/N ratio is expressed as the ratio of soil organic carbon to total nitrogen content. The calculation of organic carbon stock and nitrogen stock within each soil layer, spanning depths of 0–50 cm, was performed using the following equations:
S O C s t o c k = B D × S O C c × D 10
T N s t o c k = B D × T N c × D 10
where SOCstock is the soil organic carbon stock (Mg Corg ha−1), and BD is assumed based on a reference value of 0.85 g cm−3 from previous relevant studies [25,27]. SOCc is the soil organic carbon content (g kg−1), and D is the thickness of the soil layer (cm). TNstock is the soil nitrogen stock (Mg N ha−1) and TNc is the soil total nitrogen content.

2.3. Data Analysis

Statistical analysis began with the evaluation of normality for soil parameter data from mangrove and S. alterniflora habitats, utilizing the Shapiro–Wilk test. For data adhering to a normal distribution, Student’s t-test for independent samples was applied to identify differences between groups. Conversely, for data not following a normal distribution, the Mann–Whitney U test was utilized. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to explore the relationships among soil SOC, TIC, TN, and C/N ratio. A significance level of p < 0.05 was adopted to determine statistically significant differences. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 27.0.1.0).

3. Results

3.1. Vertical Distribution Characteristics of Soil TC, SOC, and TN

The mean TC and SOC contents in the soil samples were 13.26 ± 0.39 g Kg−1 and 6.60 ± 0.15 g Kg−1, respectively. The TC contents ranged from 8.7 g Kg−1 to 21.7 g Kg−1 in mangrove soils and ranged from 9.6 g Kg−1 to 16.2 g Kg−1 in S. alterniflora soils. Vertically, the TC content of mangrove soil exhibited an upward trend from the profile base to the surface and was higher than those in S. alterniflora soils at the depths of 0–10 cm and 15–20 cm (Figure 2A). However, no significant difference was observed in TC content between mangrove soil (13.36 ± 0.73 g Kg−1) and S. alterniflora soil (13.15 ± 0.30 g Kg−1). The contents of SOC in mangrove and S. alterniflora soils were 5.3 g Kg−1–9.3 g Kg−1 (6.40 ± 0.21 g Kg−1) and 5.7 g Kg−1–8.7 g Kg−1 (6.80 ± 0.20 g Kg−1), respectively. The SOC content of S. alterniflora soil decreased with depth and was higher in the surface layer than in mangrove soils (Figure 2C).
The average TN content in the soil samples was 1.00 ± 0.03 g Kg−1. The TN contents in mangrove and S. alterniflora soils were 0.6 g Kg−1–1.4 g Kg−1 (0.95 ± 0.05 g Kg−1) and 0.8 g Kg−1–1.3 g Kg−1 (1.06 ± 0.03 g Kg−1), respectively. TN content showed a decreasing trend with soil depth, with mangrove soil exhibiting higher TN content than S. alterniflora soil only at the 15–20 cm layer (Figure 2B).

3.2. Vertical Distribution Characteristics of Soil δ13C, δ15N, and C/N Ratio

The δ13C values of the collected soil samples ranged from −24.38‰ to −20.53‰, with a mean of −21.93 ± 0.14‰ (Table 1). And the δ13C values of mangroves and S. alterniflora soils ranged from −24.38‰ to −21.02‰ and −24.09‰ to −20.53‰, respectively. In vertical distribution, the δ13C values all showed a decrease followed by an increase with the increase in soil depth. Except for the 15–20 cm and 40–50 cm depths, the δ13C values of S. alterniflora were higher than those of mangroves (Figure 2E). The δ15N values of mangrove soil and S. alterniflora soil ranged from 3.11‰ to 3.93‰ and 2.52‰ to 4.85‰, respectively, while showing an initial increase from the profile base to the 10–15 cm depth, followed by a decrease towards the surface layer (Figure 2F).
The average C/N ratio of the collected soil samples was 6.75 ± 0.21 (Table 1). The C/N ratios of mangrove and S. alterniflora soils were 4.29–10.83 (7.07 ± 0.39) and 5.27–7.91 (6.42 ± 0.16), respectively. The C/N ratio of mangrove soil showed significant fluctuations from 30 cm to 10 cm, peaking at 15 cm depth. However, the C/N ratio in S. alterniflora soils slightly decreased with increasing soil depth (Figure 2D). No significant difference was found in the C/N ratio between the soils of the two vegetation soils.

3.3. Differences between Ecotypes and Soil Layers

Among the soil composition variables analyzed, only TN content and δ15N were normal distribution, whereas TC, SOC content, C/N ratio, and δ13C values exhibited non-normal distribution (Table 1). In terms of vegetation types, the SOC content in salt marsh soil (0.68 ± 0.02%) was higher than in mangrove soil (0.64 ± 0.02%) (p < 0.05), and the TN content in salt marsh soil (0.11 ± 0.003%) was also significantly greater than in mangrove soil (0.09 ± 0.005%) (p < 0.05) (Figure 3A,B). The difference in the δ13C value between mangrove soil (−22.33 ± 0.18‰) and salt marsh soil (−21.54 ± 0.17‰) was very significant (p < 0.01) (Figure 3C). However, the δ15N value did not significantly differ between mangrove soil (3.51 ± 0.05‰) and salt marsh soil (3.43 ± 0.14‰) (Figure 3D).
Analyzing the soil profile stratification, the difference in the SOC content between the soil surface layer (0–20 cm) (0.69 ± 0.02%) and soil subsurface layer (30–50 cm) (0.61 ± 0.01%) was very significant (p < 0.01) (Figure 3E), with higher values in the surface layer. Similarly, TN content was also significantly higher in the soil surface layer (0.11 ± 0.004%) compared to the soil subsurface layer (0.09 ± 0.004%) (p < 0.05) (Figure 3F). Nevertheless, there were no significant differences between the δ13C values (−22.13 ± 0.21‰) and δ15N values (3.57 ± 0.11‰) of the soil surface layer and the δ13C values (−21.66 ± 0.14‰) and δ15N values (3.33 ± 0.08‰) of the soil subsurface layer (Figure 3G,H).
In the 0–50 cm soil layer, the SOC stock of S. alterniflora (28.14 ± 0.35 Mg Corg ha−1) was higher than that of mangrove soils (26.76 ± 0.82 Mg Corg ha−1) (Figure 4), although this difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, no significant difference was found in TN stock between two vegetation types, with mangrove soils having a TNstock of 3.95 ± 0.02 Mg N ha−1 compared to 4.42 Mg N ha−1 in S. alterniflora soils.

4. Discussion

4.1. Stocks and Sources of Soil Carbon in Non-Native K. obovata Afforestation and S. alterniflora Invasion

Previous studies have indicated that the carbon pools in mangrove ecosystems increase with age, peaking in mature mangroves [16]. Compared with other subtropical mangrove species, such as Avicennia marina and Aegiceras corniculatum, K. obovata exhibits relatively weaker carbon fixation capabilities (Table 2) [28]. Nonetheless, some studies show that the impacts of S. alterniflora invasion and mangrove restoration on soil carbon stocks are different (Table 2) [29,30]. Gu et al. [30] suggested that both S. alterniflora invasion and mangrove restoration contribute to increased soil carbon stocks, whereas Feng et al. [29] reported no significant changes in soil organic carbon stocks as a result of these interventions.
In this study, the SOC stocks between mangrove and S. alterniflora soils did not significantly differ, aligning with results observed in Zhangjiakou but diverging from those in the Jiulong River estuary, Fujian Province [34,35]. Moreover, the SOC content in both vegetation types was found to be lower than that reported for Qi’ao Island, Guangdong Province [36]. Similarly, the soil organic carbon stocks in mangroves from this study were lower than those in natural mangroves in Zhangjiangkou, Fujian, and SOC stocks in S. alterniflora were also lower compared to those reported in other regional studies (Table 2). This discrepancy could be attributed to variations in latitude, geographical location, and climate conditions [37]. The mangroves in the study area, being recently restored, are sparse and immature, leading to reduced soil carbon accumulation. Additionally, tidal erosion may contribute to the loss of surface litter, further affecting carbon stock levels.
In this investigation, salt marsh soils exhibited significantly higher δ13C values compared to mangrove soils, consistent with findings reported by Xia et al. (Figure 5) [20]. Wetland soil organic matter (SOM) primarily originates from two sources: allochthonous inputs, such as river and ocean contributions, and autochthonous production. Allochthonous sources, enriched with nutrients from riverine inputs, are typically more substantial contributors to wetland soil SOC than autochthonous origins [31]. The differentiation between terrestrial and aquatic plant sediment sources has been effectively achieved through the analysis of stable carbon isotopes (δ13C) and C/N ratios [38]. C3 plants (like mangroves) have δ13C values ranging from −34‰ to −23‰, C4 plants (like S. alterniflora) range from −17‰ to −9‰, and marine phytoplankton range from −17‰ to −23‰ [39,40,41]. Terrestrial plants predominantly consist of high-nitrogen compounds like lignin and cellulose, leading to C/N ratios above 12, in contrast to marine phytoplankton, which typically possess C/N ratios below 10 [42,43].
In contrast to Hu et al.’s findings on plant tissue δ13C and C/N ratios on Ximen Island, our results indicate that mangrove soils feature a higher δ13C value (−22.33 ± 0.18‰) and a lower C/N ratio (7.07 ± 0.39), whereas S. alterniflora soils present a lower δ13C value (−21.54 ± 0.17‰) and C/N ratio (6.42 ± 0.16). This pattern suggests a reduced contribution of plant tissues to the soil carbon pool, implying a significant influence of marine phytoplankton on soil organic matter composition [27,44]. Additionally, the δ13C value in the mangrove soil surface layer (0–20 cm) was found to be lower than in the subsurface layer, indicating the substantial role of mangrove litter decomposition in contributing to the SOC of the surface layer [27]. Tidal dynamics on Ximen Island facilitate the influx of external carbon sources, supporting evidence from studies along the Zhejiang coast of the East China Sea that muddy surface sediments primarily derive from marine organic matter [45]. Furthermore, human activities, such as aquaculture, may also contribute to the carbon sources in vegetation soils. Further research is warranted to explore the impact of such activities on the carbon sources of mangrove and S. alterniflora soils on Ximen Island.

4.2. Stocks and Sources of Soil Nitrogen in Non-Native K. obovata Afforestation and S. alterniflora Invasion

In both vegetation types, a positive correlation was observed between soil TN and TIC contents (r = 0.73, p < 0.01), whereas no significant correlation was found with SOC content (Figure 6), suggesting that mangroves and S. alterniflora may share similar soil nutrient sources. The invasion of S. alterniflora has been shown to significantly enhance the TN content in the soil of sparse mangrove wetlands, aligning with findings from previous research [34,46]. This increase can be attributed to S. alterniflora’s capacity to utilize ammonium and nitrate nitrogen forms less accessible to other wetland species and its ability to alter the nitrogen-fixing microbial community, thus exhibiting a higher nitrogen fixation rate compared to native plants [47,48,49]. Nitrogen, a critical limiting nutrient for S. alterniflora, finds an abundant source in the extensive aquaculture practices on Ximen Island, facilitating its growth [50,51].
The δ15N values in the surface layers of both mangrove and S. alterniflora soils were found to be higher than those in the subsurface layers (Figure 5), a finding that corroborates the study by Wang et al. but contrasts with Xia et al. [20,31]. This discrepancy may result from more intense microbial decomposition activity in the surface layer, whereas subsurface δ15N enrichment is mitigated by temperature and tidal influences. As an indicator of soil organic matter quality, the δ15N value increases with the progression of organic matter decomposition and humification [32]. Although the δ15N value in S. alterniflora soils was slightly lower than in mangrove soils, the significantly higher TN content suggests a greater contribution of external inputs to soil organic matter.

5. Conclusions

This study on the soil carbon and nitrogen stocks and sources within the subtropical coastal wetlands of Yueqing Bay, China, especially in areas affected by the afforestation of non-native K. obovata and the invasion of S. alterniflora, provides essential insights into the biogeochemical processes shaping these ecosystems. Our findings reveal notable similarities in soil carbon and nitrogen stocks between K. obovata and S. alterniflora habitats, indicating that the ecological impacts of these two vegetation types on soil biogeochemical properties are comparable. The observed vertical distribution patterns of TC, SOC, TN, δ13C, and δ15N within the soil profiles highlight complex biogeochemical interactions, modulated by both natural processes and human activities. Merging biogeochemical research with an evaluation of ecosystem services could elucidate the economic and societal advantages of wetland conservation and restoration efforts. This integrative approach offers a persuasive rationale for policy endorsement, aimed at rejuvenating and expanding natural blue carbon ecosystems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.J. and K.S.; methodology, K.S., C.G., C.H., F.L. and B.J.; software, B.J.; validation, B.J., Q.Y. and Q.W.; form analysis, B.J.; investigation, B.J.; resources, B.J.; data curation, B.J. and Q.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, B.J. and Q.Y.; writing—review and editing, B.J. and Q.Y.; visualization, B.J.; supervision, B.J.; project administration, B.J.; funding acquisition, B.J. and Q.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research and the APC was funded by a project supported by the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 32202935, and Zhejiang Province College Students’ Science and Technology Innovation Activity Plan (Xinmiao Project), grant number 2023R411006.

Data Availability Statement

Data related to this study are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Wen Ding, Ziying Zhao, Ruohan Zhao, Jing Yang, Siqi Liu, Yuxuan Zou, Leying Cai, Congcong Lv, Xin Zhou, Zeyu Zhou, Xueli Li, Kai Zhang, and many other students and Bonian Shui and many other teachers from Zhejiang Ocean University who provided valuable support and assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Macreadie, P.I.; Costa, M.D.; Atwood, T.B.; Friess, D.A.; Kelleway, J.J.; Kennedy, H.; Lovelock, C.E.; Serrano, O.; Duarte, C.M. Blue carbon as a natural climate solution. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2021, 2, 826–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wilson, A.M.W.; Forsyth, C. Restoring near-shore marine ecosystems to enhance climate security for island ocean states: Aligning international processes and local practices. Mar. Policy 2018, 93, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mitsch, W.J.; Gosselink, J.G. Wetlands; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. Barbier, E.B.; Hacker, S.D.; Kennedy, C.; Koch, E.W.; Stier, A.C.; Silliman, B.R. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 2011, 81, 169–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nagelkerken, I.; Blaber, S.; Bouillon, S.; Green, P.; Haywood, M.; Kirton, L.; Meynecke, J.-O.; Pawlik, J.; Penrose, H.; Sasekumar, A. The habitat function of mangroves for terrestrial and marine fauna: A review. Aquat. Bot. 2008, 89, 155–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Macreadie, P.I.; Anton, A.; Raven, J.A.; Beaumont, N.; Connolly, R.M.; Friess, D.A.; Kelleway, J.J.; Kennedy, H.; Kuwae, T.; Lavery, P.S. The future of Blue Carbon science. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alongi, D.M. Carbon cycling and storage in mangrove forests. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2014, 6, 195–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, L.; Wang, W.; Li, Q.Q.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, S.; Osland, M.J.; Huang, J.; Peng, C. Mangrove species’ responses to winter air temperature extremes in China. Ecosphere 2017, 8, e01865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lu, W.-X.; Zhang, B.-H.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Yang, S.-C. Differentiation of cold tolerance in an artificial population of a mangrove species, Kandelia obovata, is associated with geographic origins. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 12, 695746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, L.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, G. Recent progresses in mangrove conservation, restoration and research in China. J. Plant Ecol. 2009, 2, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Y.-S.; Gu, J.-D. Ecological responses, adaptation and mechanisms of mangrove wetland ecosystem to global climate change and anthropogenic activities. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2021, 162, 105248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhou, T.; Liu, S.; Feng, Z.; Liu, G.; Gan, Q.; Peng, S. Use of exotic plants to control Spartina alterniflora invasion and promote mangrove restoration. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Atwood, T.B.; Connolly, R.M.; Almahasheer, H.; Carnell, P.E.; Duarte, C.M.; Ewers Lewis, C.J.; Irigoien, X.; Kelleway, J.J.; Lavery, P.S.; Macreadie, P.I. Global patterns in mangrove soil carbon stocks and losses. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2017, 7, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Donato, D.C.; Kauffman, J.B.; Murdiyarso, D.; Kurnianto, S.; Stidham, M.; Kanninen, M. Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat. Geosci. 2011, 4, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sasmito, S.D.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Lubis, A.A.; Murdiyarso, D.; Hutley, L.B.; Bachri, S.; Friess, D.A.; Martius, C.; Borchard, N. Organic carbon burial and sources in soils of coastal mudflat and mangrove ecosystems. Catena 2020, 187, 104414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alongi, D.M. Carbon sequestration in mangrove forests. Carbon Manag. 2012, 3, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sarker, S.; Masud-Ul-Alam, M.; Hossain, M.S.; Rahman Chowdhury, S.; Sharifuzzaman, S. A review of bioturbation and sediment organic geochemistry in mangroves. Geol. J. 2021, 56, 2439–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Alongi, D.M. Cycling and global fluxes of nitrogen in mangroves. Glob. Environ. Res. 2013, 17, 173–182. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sanders, C.J.; Eyre, B.D.; Santos, I.R.; Machado, W.; Luiz-Silva, W.; Smoak, J.M.; Breithaupt, J.L.; Ketterer, M.E.; Sanders, L.; Marotta, H. Elevated rates of organic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus accumulation in a highly impacted mangrove wetland. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2014, 41, 2475–2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xia, S.; Song, Z.; Singh, B.P.; Guo, L.; Bolan, N.; Wang, W.; Lin, G.; Fang, Y.; Wen, X.; Wang, J. Contrasting patterns and controls of soil carbon and nitrogen isotope compositions in coastal wetlands of China. Plant Soil 2023, 489, 483–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ray, R.; Majumder, N.; Das, S.; Chowdhury, C.; Jana, T.K. Biogeochemical cycle of nitrogen in a tropical mangrove ecosystem, east coast of India. Mar. Chem. 2014, 167, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ellison, A.M. Mangrove restoration: Do we know enough? Restor. Ecol. 2000, 8, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Junk, W.J.; An, S.; Finlayson, C.; Gopal, B.; Květ, J.; Mitchell, S.A.; Mitsch, W.J.; Robarts, R.D. Current state of knowledge regarding the world’s wetlands and their future under global climate change: A synthesis. Aquat. Sci. 2013, 75, 151–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, C.; Cui, L.; Wang, D. Distribution and pollution assessment of heavy metals in surface sediments of aquaculture area in Yueqing bay. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2015, 31, 204–210. [Google Scholar]
  25. Thura, K.; Serrano, O.; Gu, J.L.; Fang, Y.Y.; Htwe, H.Z.; Zhu, Y.J.; Huang, R.Q.; Agusti, S.; Duarte, C.M.; Wang, H.L.; et al. Mangrove restoration built soil organic carbon stocks over six decades: A chronosequence study. J. Soils Sediments 2023, 23, 1193–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, A.; Chen, J.; Jing, C.; Ye, G.; Wu, J.; Huang, Z.; Zhou, C. Monitoring the invasion of Spartina alterniflora from 1993 to 2014 with Landsat TM and SPOT 6 satellite data in Yueqing Bay, China. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, J.; Loh, P.S.; Pradit, S.; Le, T.P.Q.; Oeurng, C.; Mohamed, C.A.R.; Lee, C.W.; Lu, X.; Anshari, G.Z.; Kandasamy, S. Assessing the effect of age and geomorphic setting on organic carbon accumulation in high-latitude human-planted mangroves. Forests 2022, 13, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, S.; Chen, B.; Chen, G.; Ji, J.; Yu, W.; Liao, J.; Chen, G. Higher soil organic carbon sequestration potential at a rehabilitated mangrove comprised of Aegiceras corniculatum compared to Kandelia obovata. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 752, 142279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Feng, J.X.; Zhou, J.; Wang, L.M.; Cui, X.W.; Ning, C.X.; Wu, H.; Zhu, X.S.; Lin, G.H. Effects of short-term invasion of Spartina alterniflora and the subsequent restoration of native mangroves on the soil organic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stock. Chemosphere 2017, 184, 774–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gu, J.; Wu, J. Blue carbon effects of mangrove restoration in subtropics where Spartina alterniflora invaded. Ecol. Eng. 2023, 186, 106822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, F.; Zhang, N.; Yang, S.; Li, Y.; Yang, L.; Cao, W. Source and stability of soil organic carbon jointly regulate soil carbon pool, but source alteration is more effective in mangrove ecosystem following Spartina alterniflora invasion. Catena 2024, 235, 107681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gao, Y.; Peng, R.-H.; Ouyang, Z.-T.; Shao, C.-L.; Chen, J.-Q.; Zhang, T.-T.; Guo, H.-Q.; Tang, J.-W.; Zhao, F.; Zhuang, P.; et al. Enhanced Lateral Exchange of Carbon and Nitrogen in a Coastal Wetland with Invasive Spartina alterniflora. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2020, 125, e2019JG005459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, W.; An, S.; Zhao, H.; Xu, L.; Qiao, Y.; Cheng, X. Impacts of Spartina alterniflora invasion on soil organic carbon and nitrogen pools sizes, stability, and turnover in a coastal salt marsh of eastern China. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 86, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Q.; Kang, Q.; Zhao, B.; Li, H.; Lu, H.; Liu, J.; Yan, C. Effect of land-use and land-cover change on mangrove soil carbon fraction and metal pollution risk in Zhangjiang Estuary, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 807, 150973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yu, X.; Yang, J.; Liu, L.; Tian, Y.; Yu, Z. Effects of Spartina alterniflora invasion on biogenic elements in a subtropical coastal mangrove wetland. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2015, 22, 3107–3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Feng, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, S.; Ying, R.; Yin, F.; Jiang, L.; Li, Z. Effects of invasive Spartina alterniflora loisel. and subsequent ecological replacement by Sonneratia apetala Buch. -Ham. on soil organic carbon fractions and stock. Forests 2019, 10, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Meng, W.; Feagin, R.A.; Hu, B.; He, M.; Li, H. The spatial distribution of blue carbon in the coastal wetlands of China. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2019, 222, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Meyers, P.A. Organic geochemical proxies of paleoceanographic, paleolimnologic, and paleoclimatic processes. Org. Geochem. 1997, 27, 213–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bouillon, S.; Connolly, R.; Lee, S. Organic matter exchange and cycling in mangrove ecosystems: Recent insights from stable isotope studies. J. Sea Res. 2008, 59, 44–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rani, V.; Nandan, S.B.; Schwing, P.T. Carbon source characterisation and historical carbon burial in three mangrove ecosystems on the South West coast of India. Catena 2021, 197, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chmura, G.; Aharon, P. Stable carbon isotope signatures of sedimentary carbon in coastal wetlands as indicators of salinity regime. J. Coast. Res. 1995, 11, 124–135. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lamb, A.L.; Wilson, G.P.; Leng, M.J. A review of coastal palaeoclimate and relative sea-level reconstructions using δ13C and C/N ratios in organic material. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2006, 75, 29–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Martiny, A.; Vrugt, J.A.; Primeau, F.W.; Lomas, M.W. Regional variation in the particulate organic carbon to nitrogen ratio in the surface ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2013, 27, 723–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tue, N.T.; Nguyen, P.T.; Quan, D.M.; Dung, L.V.; Quy, T.D.; Nhuan, M.T.; Thai, N.D. Sedimentary composition and organic carbon sources in mangrove forests along the coast of northeast Vietnam. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2018, 17, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xu, G.; Liu, J.; Hu, G.; Jonell, T.N.; Chen, L.L. Distribution and source of organic matter in surface sediment from the muddy deposit along the Zhejiang coast, East China Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 123, 395–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, D.B.; Huang, W.; Liang, R.W.; Li, F.S. Effects of Spartina alterniflora Invasion on Soil Quality in Coastal Wetland of Beibu Gulf of South China. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, B.; Liao, C.-H.; Zhang, X.-D.; Chen, H.-L.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Z.-Y.; Gan, X.-J.; Wu, J.-H.; Zhao, B.; Ma, Z.-J.; et al. Spartina alterniflora invasions in the Yangtze River estuary, China: An overview of current status and ecosystem effects. Ecol. Eng. 2009, 35, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huang, J.X.; Xu, X.; Wang, M.; Nie, M.; Qiu, S.Y.; Wang, Q.; Quan, Z.X.; Xiao, M.; Li, B. Responses of soil nitrogen fixation to Spartina alterniflora invasion and nitrogen addition in a Chinese salt marsh. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Morris, J.T. The nitrogen uptake kinetics of Spartina alterniflora in culture. Ecology 1980, 61, 1114–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Joesting, H.M.; Blaylock, R.; Biber, P.; Ray, A. The use of marine aquaculture solid waste for nursery production of the salt marsh plants Spartina alterniflora and Juncus roemerianus. Aquac. Rep. 2016, 3, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Craft, C.; Reader, J.; Sacco, J.N.; Broome, S.W. Twenty-five years of ecosystem development of constructed Spartina alterniflora (Loisel) marshes. Ecol. Appl. 1999, 9, 1405–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Ximen Island study area and sampling point in Yueqing Bay, Zhejiang Province, China (M and S represent mangrove and Spartina alterniflora salt marsh, respectively).
Figure 1. Ximen Island study area and sampling point in Yueqing Bay, Zhejiang Province, China (M and S represent mangrove and Spartina alterniflora salt marsh, respectively).
Water 16 00866 g001
Figure 2. Vertical distribution of (A) TC content, (B) TN content, (C) SOC content, (D) C/N ratio, (E) δ13C value, and (F) δ15N value in different soil depth profiles of mangrove (M) and Spartina alterniflora (S).
Figure 2. Vertical distribution of (A) TC content, (B) TN content, (C) SOC content, (D) C/N ratio, (E) δ13C value, and (F) δ15N value in different soil depth profiles of mangrove (M) and Spartina alterniflora (S).
Water 16 00866 g002
Figure 3. Violin plot with included boxplot of (A) SOC content, (B) TN content, (C) δ13C value, and (D) δ15N value in mangrove (M); (E)SOC content, (F) TN content, (G) δ13C value, and (H) δ15N value Spartina alterniflora (S) soils, as well as soil surface layer and soil subsurface layer. an asterisk (*) denotes a statistically significant difference, with a p-value less than 0.05.
Figure 3. Violin plot with included boxplot of (A) SOC content, (B) TN content, (C) δ13C value, and (D) δ15N value in mangrove (M); (E)SOC content, (F) TN content, (G) δ13C value, and (H) δ15N value Spartina alterniflora (S) soils, as well as soil surface layer and soil subsurface layer. an asterisk (*) denotes a statistically significant difference, with a p-value less than 0.05.
Water 16 00866 g003
Figure 4. Organic carbon and nitrogen stocks of mangrove (M) and Spartina alterniflora (S) in 0–50 cm soil.
Figure 4. Organic carbon and nitrogen stocks of mangrove (M) and Spartina alterniflora (S) in 0–50 cm soil.
Water 16 00866 g004
Figure 5. Biplot of (a) δ13C and δ15N, (b) δ15N and C/N, and (c) δ13C and C/N in different soil depth profiles of mangrove (M) and Spartina alterniflora (S).
Figure 5. Biplot of (a) δ13C and δ15N, (b) δ15N and C/N, and (c) δ13C and C/N in different soil depth profiles of mangrove (M) and Spartina alterniflora (S).
Water 16 00866 g005
Figure 6. Correlation between SOC, TIC, TN, and C/N in mangrove (M) and Spartina alterniflora (S) soils.
Figure 6. Correlation between SOC, TIC, TN, and C/N in mangrove (M) and Spartina alterniflora (S) soils.
Water 16 00866 g006
Table 1. Normality test of soil composition variables: carbon, nitrogen, and isotopic ratios in coastal wetlands on Ximen Island, Zhejiang, China.
Table 1. Normality test of soil composition variables: carbon, nitrogen, and isotopic ratios in coastal wetlands on Ximen Island, Zhejiang, China.
VariableMeanStandard ErrornSkewnessKurtosisShapiro–Wilk Test of Normality
Statistic W Valuep
Total Carbon (%)1.330.04421.042.200.9310.014 *
Soil Organic Carbon (%)0.660.01421.210.980.8840.000 **
Total Nitrogen (%)0.100.00420.00−0.470.9720.377
C/N6.750.21420.971.590.9340.018 *
δ13C (‰)−21.930.1442−1.051.360.9170.005 **
δ15N (‰)3.470.07420.731.530.9540.092
Note: * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01.
Table 2. Stocks and sources of soil carbon and nitrogen in subtropic coastal wetlands of China.
Table 2. Stocks and sources of soil carbon and nitrogen in subtropic coastal wetlands of China.
Subtropic Coastal
Wetlands
LatitudeDominate SpeciesSoil DepthSoil Organic CarbonSoil Total NitrogenC/Nδ13Cδ15NReferences
cmMg C ha−1Mg N ha−1
Native + Invasive speciesMangrove23°53′ NKandelia obovate, Avicennia marina, and Aegiceras corniculatum0–3065.65.65.62~20.04−28.42~−21.743.95~7.59[31]
24°24′ NK. obovata0–6039.74.5 [29]
23°53′ NS. alterniflora0–3052.15.46.82~14.62−23.02~−18.154.51~7.54[31]
24°24′ NS. alterniflora0–6039.54.9 [29]
Mudflat23°53′ N 0–3033.34.17.17~26.25−25.70~−23.21 3.53~5.72[31]
Mudflat24°24′ N 0–60414.45 [29]
Non-native + Invasive speciesNorthern Margin Mangrove28°20′ NK. obovata0–10065.53 6.7−22.30 [27]
28°20’ NK. obovata0–5026.763.954.29~10.83−24.38~−21.023.11~3.93This study
28°21′ NS. alterniflora0–10071.72 [27]
28°20’ NS. alterniflora0–5028.144.425.27~7.91−24.09~−20.532.52~4.85This study
Mudflat28°20′ N 0–10069.52 −21.6~−22.5 [27]
Invasive speciesSalt marsh31°30′ NPhragmites australis0–20 1.619.7 [32]
32°48′ NPhragmites australis0–3016.84 −24.972.37[33]
31°30′ NS. alterniflora0–20 1.7818.6 [32]
32°48′ NS.alterniflora0–3037.83 −18.413.93[33]
Mudflat32°48′ N 0–304.49 −21.110.48[33]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ye, Q.; Hou, C.; Wang, Q.; Gao, C.; Stefanik, K.; Li, F.; Jiang, B. Stocks and Sources of Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in Non-Native Kandelia obovata Afforestation and Spartina alterniflora Invasion: A Case Study on Northern Margin Mangroves in the Subtropical Coastal Wetlands of China. Water 2024, 16, 866. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16060866

AMA Style

Ye Q, Hou C, Wang Q, Gao C, Stefanik K, Li F, Jiang B. Stocks and Sources of Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in Non-Native Kandelia obovata Afforestation and Spartina alterniflora Invasion: A Case Study on Northern Margin Mangroves in the Subtropical Coastal Wetlands of China. Water. 2024; 16(6):866. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16060866

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ye, Qianwen, Cuicui Hou, Qiang Wang, Changjun Gao, Kay Stefanik, Feng Li, and Bingbing Jiang. 2024. "Stocks and Sources of Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in Non-Native Kandelia obovata Afforestation and Spartina alterniflora Invasion: A Case Study on Northern Margin Mangroves in the Subtropical Coastal Wetlands of China" Water 16, no. 6: 866. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16060866

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop