Next Article in Journal
Development of ZnFeCe Layered Double Hydroxide Incorporated Thin Film Nanocomposite Membrane with Enhanced Separation Performance and Antibacterial Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Pollution Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Typical Antibiotics and Persistent Organic Pollutants in Reservoir Water Sources
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Water
Volume 15
Issue 2
10.3390/w15020261
Review Report
water-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Research on High-Quality Development Evaluation and Regulation Model: A Case Study of the Yellow River Water Supply Area in Henan Province

Water 2023, 15(2), 261; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15020261
by Xiuyu Zhang 1, Ying Zhou 1 and Chunhui Han 1,2,*
Reviewer 1:
Xiangyi Ding
Reviewer 2:
Daniel P. Loucks
Water 2023, 15(2), 261; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15020261
Submission received: 21 November 2022 / Revised: 21 December 2022 / Accepted: 5 January 2023 / Published: 8 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Urban Water Management)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Overall suggestion:

The authors used the single-index quantification-multi index synthesis-multi criterion integration method (SMI-P) to evaluate the high-quality development level of the southern section of the Yellow River and identified the key constraints. Using the method of embedded system dynamics, a high-quality development regulation model was established, and the changes of high-quality development level under different development scenarios were simulated. This is an interesting study, which is of great value to regional studies as a case study. It is also an essential resource for Water because achieving high-quality human and natural development is a hot and challenging current issue. It is recommended to adopt it after some revisions.

Below are some comments and suggestions for the improvement of the manuscript.

Specific suggestions:

Comment 1: The classification in Article 2.1 needs to be clarified. Please correct it.

Comment 2: The abbreviations for each system in Figure 4 and Figure 5 do not appear in the previous article, so please add them where appropriate.

Comment 3: The description in the picture must be consistent with the text. For example, the scheme name in 3.2.2 must be consistent with the legend in Figure 6.

Comment 4: Which year's regulation results are the values of key factors in Table 5? Please be specific.

Author Response

请参阅附件。

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop