Next Article in Journal
Study on the Relationship between River Water and Groundwater under Different Aquifer Mediums
Next Article in Special Issue
Failure of the Downstream Shoulder of Rockfill Dams Due to Overtopping or Throughflow
Previous Article in Journal
Trends of Rainfall Variability and Drought Monitoring Using Standardized Precipitation Index in a Scarcely Gauged Basin of Northern Pakistan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influences on the Seismic Response of a Gravity Dam with Different Foundation and Reservoir Modeling Assumptions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prediction of Concrete Dam Deformation through the Combination of Machine Learning Models

by
Patricia Alocén
1,2,*,
Miguel Á. Fernández-Centeno
1,2 and
Miguel Á. Toledo
1
1
E.T.S. de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Profesor Aranguren s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2
ACIS Innovation+Engineering S.L. (ACIS2in), Planeta Urano 13, P18 2ºA, Parla, 28983 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2022, 14(7), 1133; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071133
Submission received: 25 February 2022 / Revised: 26 March 2022 / Accepted: 29 March 2022 / Published: 1 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dam Safety. Overtopping and Geostructural Risks)

Abstract

Dam safety monitoring is of vital importance, due to the high number of fatalities and large economic damage that a failure might imply. This, along with the evolution of artificial intelligence, has led to machine learning techniques being increasingly applied in this field. Many researchers have successfully trained models to predict dam behavior, but errors vary depending on the method used, meaning that the optimal model is not always the same over time. The main goal of this paper is to improve model precision by combining different models. Our research focuses on the comparison of two successful integration strategies in other areas: Stacking and Blending. The methodology was applied to the prediction of radial movements of an arch-gravity dam and was divided into two parts. First, we compared the usual method of estimating model errors and their hyperparameters, i.e., Random Cross Validation and Blocked Cross Validation. This aspect is relevant not only for the importance of robust estimates, but also because it is the source of the data sets used to train meta-learners. The second and main research topic of this paper was the comparison of combination strategies, for which two different types of tests were performed. The results obtained suggest that Blocked CV outperforms the random approach in robustness and that Stacking provides better predictions than Blending. The generalized linear meta-learners trained by the Stacking strategy achieved higher accuracy than the individual models in most cases.
Keywords: stacking; blending; combination; meta-learner; experts; machine learning; Cross Validation; radial displacement stacking; blending; combination; meta-learner; experts; machine learning; Cross Validation; radial displacement

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alocén, P.; Fernández-Centeno, M.Á.; Toledo, M.Á. Prediction of Concrete Dam Deformation through the Combination of Machine Learning Models. Water 2022, 14, 1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071133

AMA Style

Alocén P, Fernández-Centeno MÁ, Toledo MÁ. Prediction of Concrete Dam Deformation through the Combination of Machine Learning Models. Water. 2022; 14(7):1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071133

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alocén, Patricia, Miguel Á. Fernández-Centeno, and Miguel Á. Toledo. 2022. "Prediction of Concrete Dam Deformation through the Combination of Machine Learning Models" Water 14, no. 7: 1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071133

APA Style

Alocén, P., Fernández-Centeno, M. Á., & Toledo, M. Á. (2022). Prediction of Concrete Dam Deformation through the Combination of Machine Learning Models. Water, 14(7), 1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071133

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop