In recent decades, under the joint influence of global climate change and rapid urbanization, the water cycle process and elements have undergone drastic changes, extreme weather events have increased and enhanced [1
], urban heat island effect and urban rain island effect have emerged [1
], urban surface runoff and confluence mechanisms have changed, which makes the urban pluvial flooding disasters increasingly serious [4
World Meteorological Organization statistics show that from 1970 to 2009, there were 7870 hydro-meteorological-related disasters worldwide, causing a total number of 1.86 million deaths and USD 1.90 trillion in economic losses, of which rainstorms and floods accounted for 79% of the total number of disasters, with 56% of the deaths and 85% of the economic losses, respectively [7
]. The increase in the frequency and severity of urban pluvial flooding disasters has posed a huge challenge to sustainable development and economic construction in countries around the world [8
China is significantly influenced by monsoon, and urban pluvial flooding is concentrated from May to September [7
]. Since the rapid development of urbanization after the implementation of China’s reform and opening-up policy in 1978, urban pluvial flooding disasters are more serious, and the phenomena of “urban sea-viewing” have occurred repeatedly in major cities in China, especially in the eastern coastal cities [12
]. Statistics from the China Water and Drought Disaster Bulletin 2018 show that from 2000 to 2018, China suffered 21,720 deaths and direct economic losses of RMB 316.39 billion due to urban pluvial flooding [13
]. Among them, on 18 July 2007, Jinan City was hit by a extremely heavy rainstorm, causing more than 30 deaths and 170 injuries, about 330,000 people affected, and the city’s direct economic loss was about RMB 1.32 billion [13
]. On 21 July 2012, Beijing City and its surrounding areas were hit by the heaviest rainstorm and pluvial flooding in 61 years, resulting in 79 deaths, 1.62 million people affected, and economic losses of 11.64 billion [14
]. On 11 April 2019, influenced by the convergence of cold and warm air currents, Shenzhen City experienced short-lived rainstorm and sudden pluvial flooding in several areas of the city, resulting in 11 deaths [15
]. In 2020, severe pluvial flooding caused by rainstorm that lasted for many days in southern China, according to the Ministry of Emergency Management of the People’s Republic of China website, as of 10 July 2020, pluvial flooding caused 33.85 million people affected in 27 provinces, 141 people died, and the direct economic loss was RMB 69.59 billion [13
Urban pluvial flooding has become a prominent problem affecting the public safety of cities in China and an important factor limiting the economic and social development of China [16
]. A scientific and systematic understanding of the disaster-causing mechanism of urban pluvial flooding and a comprehensive understanding of the dilemma in urban pluvial flooding governance are the basis and core of improving the urban pluvial flooding governance system, improving urban storm flooding prevention and mitigation capacity, and reducing urban pluvial flooding disasters losses [19
In China, the governance of urban pluvial flooding involves several government departments, including the Urban Management Committee, Meteorological Bureau, Water Resources Department, Housing and Construction Department, Transportation Department, Development and Reform Commission, Emergency Management Department, etc. All of these departments are administrative functions of a city, and perform all related functions under the direction of city decision makers [23
]. Among them, the Urban Management Committee is mainly responsible for studying the planning, plans, overall programs and major policy measures for urban environment design and urban management [24
]. The Meteorological Bureau is mainly responsible for monitoring and forecasting of urban rainstorms and early warnings. The Water Resources Department is mainly responsible for water resources planning, river and lake basin planning, pluvial flooding control planning, and participates in the preparation of drainage planning and implementation [25
]. The Housing and Construction Department is mainly responsible for urban housing construction and renovation and other works [26
]. The Transportation Department is mainly responsible for urban transportation development planning and construction work. The Development and Reform Commission is mainly responsible for the coordination of economic and social development [27
]. The Emergency Management Department is responsible for the public emergencies among themselves, including emergency relief work for urban pluvial flooding events. Since urban pluvial flooding affects all aspects of urban development, all the above-mentioned departments have some administrative functions in urban pluvial flooding governance, and their administrative functions are largely independent of each other in China [25
What are the local and general characteristics of the disaster-causing mechanism of urban pluvial flooding in China in the context of climate change and urbanization? How is urban pluvial flooding in China affected by both climate change and urbanization, and what are the characteristics of their disaster-causing mechanisms on urban pluvial flooding? From a disaster system perspective, how the interactions between the disaster-formative environments, the hazards and the exposures drive the formation and intensification of urban pluvial flooding? Based on the understanding of the mechanism of urban pluvial flooding, what are the current dilemmas encountered in urban pluvial flooding governance in China? How are we to understand the dilemmas in urban pluvial flooding governance from the perspective of administrative management? How are we to solve the these dilemmas in urban pluvial flooding governance? These issues are both the focus of attention in the current urban pluvial flooding governance in China by the scientific and practical communities, and are also the core issues that this paper tries to explore.
Based on the above-mentioned problems, this paper tries to explain the disaster-causing mechanism of urban pluvial flooding in China, especially from the perspectives of climate change, urbanization impact and disaster system. On this basis, this paper analyzes the main features and progress of urban pluvial flooding governance in China and the fragmentation dilemma of value integration, the fragmentation dilemma of resource and power allocation, and the fragmentation dilemma of policy formulation and implementation in urban pluvial flooding governance, aiming to reflect the governance dilemmas in terms of conflicting management orders and service values, lack of vertical top-level design at national level and blurred horizontal departmental management boundaries, outdated urban pluvial flooding control standards, and information barriers and information silos in urban pluvial flooding governance. Finally, from the perspective of holistic governance, this paper tries to conclude that holistic governance can effectively cope with the above dilemmas and propose practical paths for holistic governance of urban pluvial flooding (Figure 1
). The above-mentioned contents are set to help global audiences effectively understand urban pluvial flooding governance in China.
4. Fragmentation Dilemma in Urban Pluvial Flooding Governance in China
4.1. The Connotation of Fragmentation in Urban Pluvial Flooding Governance
Fragmentation in the administrative field refers to the lack of coordination among government departments and the difficulty of effective communication and cooperation, and the difficulty of different departments to work together to solve problems, resulting in the division of horizontal and vertical administrative functions in government agencies [36
]. Fragmentation in pluvial flooding management specifically refers to the fragmentation of the administrative functions of various government departments in the city, such as water, urban construction, environmental protection, meteorology and other departments, resulting in the fragmentation of governance authority in each department, dull framework of authority and responsibility, lack of coordination and cooperation, in a state of fragmentation [16
]. By studying the hierarchy and division of power functions in the Chinese bureaucracy, Lieberthal et al. introduced the concept of “Fragmented Authoritarianism”. Incorporating this concept, this paper presents a fragmented characterization of the existing urban pluvial flooding governance in China from three dimensions [56
]. The first dimension is the fragmentation of value integration in urban pluvial flooding governance, i.e., the conflict between management orders and service values in urban pluvial flooding governance [56
]. The second dimension is the fragmentation of resources and power allocation in urban pluvial flooding governance, which is reflected in the lack of vertical top-level design and blurred horizontal departmental management boundary in urban pluvial flooding governance [56
]. The third dimension is the fragmentation of policy formulation and implementation in urban pluvial flooding governance, which is concentrated in outdated urban pluvial flooding control standards as well as information barriers and information silos [16
]. The fragmented features of the above three dimensions reflect the deep-seated causes in urban pluvial flooding governance in China from top to bottom, from the values of urban pluvial flooding governance to the distribution of powers of governance subjects to the policy-making and information platform dilemmas [54
4.2. Fragmentation of Value Integration
The Chinese government has already started the corresponding governance work, which is mainly in the form of command-driven management, but there is not enough attention given to service-oriented drive [16
]. With regard to management objectives, the government is confined to the quagmire of interests in carrying out its work, resulting in a distorted relationship between the government and the people, by which the public is no longer a real service object, but a mechanized management object [53
]. It is impossible to fundamentally understand the needs of people by putting personal performance first when officials are in power [58
]. In this context, problems such as urban pipeline congestion are particularly common, and they have not been effectively solved in the long-term development [54
]. In terms of management constraints, the communication between governments at all levels and departments is more casual, and there is no standardized dialogue platform [48
]. At the same time, there is no restriction of responsibility risk sharing system. Although the communication between different government departments is carried out, it is inefficient. Despite the introduction of relevant documents represented by the Flood Prevention Law, they mostly stay on the surface and do not go deeper into the substantive issues [27
]. This kind of problem can be summarized into two aspects. On the one hand, the government work lacks standardized guidance, and all kinds of service behaviors have strong randomness [16
]. On the other hand, the government departments have a weak sense of overall governance, most of them are limited to the “interest ontology”. Additionally, their administrative actions are mainly based on their own interests, while ignoring the cooperation with the relevant departments. The official report of the Chinese government points out that the main contradiction in the current Chinese society has changed substantially into the contradiction between the people’s growing need for a better life and the unbalanced and inadequate development [28
]. In order to achieve fine governance in urban management, government services should not stay on the surface, but should focus on the pursuit of humanized management, and public services should be people-oriented [23
]. Government services in China refer to the services provided by the government to the public such as weather forecasting, disaster warning, etc. These services can only be determined by Chinese government departments, because in China the law stipulates that only government agencies can provide these services, other social organizations and private organizations are prohibited from providing such services [24
]. People’s demand for high-quality services has gradually increased, but the phenomenon of “one-size-fits-all management” is still common today, and the contradiction between the two is becoming more and more obvious, which is one of the deep causes of the fragmentation problem highlighted in the current urban pluvial flooding governance [54
4.3. Fragmentation of Resources and Power Allocation
Urban pluvial flooding governance is a complex and systematic work related to the construction and operation of urban pipe network, landscaping, greenery, etc. [45
]. The smooth development of this work needs to be based on the cooperation of all departments. However, under the influence of the traditional bureaucracy, the current government’s functional system is complex, and most of the institutions are set up on the basis of professional division of labor. It is difficult to make rational use of the whole resources of the government under the multi department division management pluvial flooding control system.
Firstly, the top-level design of urban pluvial flooding governance is not perfect, resulting in the relevant design planning and reality out of touch. In the vertical subordination, the management of water authorities at all levels are subject to the guidance of higher water affair departments, but also by the local government leadership, while the national planning of the Ministry of Water Resources and local water authorities are slightly more general in the circle of responsibilities. The lower water affair department is almost a replica of the higher water affair department, management and supervision of the same structure of the power to highlight the problem of things in the lower water department and power in the upper water department, the power and responsibility of the situation is disconnected. In addition, the distribution of urban pluvial governance affairs along the chain of command in the process of passing from the upper level to the lower level is prone to the misalignment problem.
Secondly, urban pluvial flooding governance lacks scientificity in the establishment of same administrative level departments, and there is a general problem of blurred boundaries of power and responsibility. In terms of the current urban pluvial flooding governance system, it mainly adopts a compartmentalized model of the administrative system, with the professional scope as the basis for the division of functions. The main reason for the problem of fragmentation of governance is the lack of coordination between professional departments and the lack of maturity of their coordination mechanisms. For example, when planning a drainage network, the urban decision makers do not make a comprehensive analysis of the feasibility of the scheme. The construction department only pays attention to the construction cost management, but does not do the corresponding operation and maintenance after the completion of construction. Likewise, the management considers more about the maintenance at the later stage and does not intervene enough in the preliminary planning and construction [16
]. Such as flood warning and related diversion work, its corresponding service subjects differ, widely covering water, meteorology and other departments, this separate management mechanism is likely to lead to pipeline maintenance is not timely, daily supervision is not in place, rainstorm assessment is not accurate and many other problems. This is also a reflection of the blurred management boundaries of various departments, such as unclear responsibilities and powers are particularly evident.
In addition, there is no efficient communication mechanism between departments, such as joint ministerial meetings, which makes the work lack of connection and thus has a restrictive impact on drainage efficiency. If subsequent problems arise, because of unclear power and responsibility, it is easy to blame each other between departments, which is also a waste of public resources. Urban drainage is a typical watershed concept, and dividing the management area according to different urban areas will fragment the rainwater circulation process, which will lead to confusion of functions among different departments and intensify the fragmentation phenomenon of pluvial flooding governance.
4.4. Fragmentation of Policy Formulation and Implementation
China’s current urban flood control standards [16
] are far behind the development of cities, and they cannot adapt to current urban development conditions, resulting in limitations in urban pluvial flooding governance. The outdated management technology is the most important reason for pluvial flooding in cities. Additionally, most cities only follow the old model in the anti-flooding work, and there are obvious limitations in analyzing the characteristics of pipe network flow, etc. On the level of planning timeframe, the city master plan is usually 20 years but, in practice, the service period of the pipe network often reaches more than 50 years [16
], so the urban drainage network will undergo several revisions and adjustments of the city master plan, and the original set of drainage facilities often passively catch up with the actual needs of the changing reality, resulting in the disconnect between urban flood control standards and the real environment, thus losing its guiding significance.
In 1975, China promulgated the drainage system design standards for once in 0.33–2 years, experienced four revisions to 2011 to adjust to: once in 1–3 years in general areas, once in 3–5 years in important areas, compared with Europe and the United States and other developed cities and drainage pipe and flood control standards are still a small gap [16
]. Additionally, in the traditional planning and design of drainage systems, the main focus is on the lower limit of urban flood control standards, and there is a lack of reasonable countermeasures for rainstorm exceeding the standards [23
]. There is a lack of standardized guidance for urban flood control design, and even for drainage canals in the same area, the design standards for drainage networks, drainage channels, and flood pumping stations are not unified across departments, and the degree of interface between them is poor, which has led to fragmentation in the formulation and implementation of urban pluvial flooding governance policies [45
The information on the drainage pipe network is incomplete, and the information barriers among various departments hinder the coordination in the process of urban pluvial flooding control. Due to the needs of urban planning and development, the expansion of the underground drainage pipe network is becoming more and more frequent. However, the underground drainage pipe network is a hidden project, which is often ignored after the landfill operation. Compared with the above ground buildings, the daily management of underground pipelines in most cities of China is not enough, and there is no effective supervision and management system. The relevant urban management departments and project construction departments do not have a strong sense of standardization, for example, the underground pipeline construction does not carry out the completion survey as required, or the drawings and data of the completion survey are not submitted to the management department as required. At present, the data of underground pipe network in most cities of China are incomplete [53
]. About 70% of the cities in China do not have the basic archives of the underground pipe network, and the vast majority of cities in China do not have a comprehensive underground pipeline comprehensive map or database [16
Due to the complexity of the organization of urban underground drainage pipeline, and the continuous expansion work, the information of underground pipeline diameter and length is distributed in various government agencies, and there is a lack of a unified management information platform. Moreover, most of the existing underground pipe network data are recorded and saved in traditional forms such as drawings and charts, which lack of scientific and technological information management means, unclear positioning of underground pipeline, incomplete and inaccurate basic data of pipeline. Even some government departments regard the obtained data as private property, which increases the degree of data information blockade, making it difficult for the data information of water related management to form an organic whole, and there are information barriers among various departments.
5. Holistic Governance Strategy for Fragmentation Dilemma of Urban Pluvial Flooding Governance in China
Holistic governance emerged in Britain in the late 1990s, which is a strategic response to fragmentation in the process of closed governance and competitive governance [36
]. The core of holistic governance is to advocate the coordination of the government’s vertical and horizontal structure and power, so as to realize the transformation from decentralization to centralization, from departments to the whole, and from fragmentation to integration. Holistic governance tries to form a multiple partnership of administrative subjects, emphasizes the functional complementarity and mutual embeddedness among multiple governance subjects, helps government agencies to reengineer and innovate with results and purposes as the center, and realizes the integrated operation of government and the intensive supply of public services. The first problem to be solved by holistic governance theory is fragmentation. Its theoretical core is coordination and integration, which emphasizes the government’s own construction, people-oriented thought, reshapes the value and sense of responsibility of public administration, takes the needs of citizens as the starting point, establishes the result oriented consciousness, continuously optimizes the government’s work process, and provides seamless public services.
At present, holistic governance has been regarded as an effective measure to solve the problem of fragmentation. In the aspect of urban pluvial flooding governance, the effective embedding of holistic governance in the government can help to alleviate the horizontal departments’ vigilance against “invasion behavior”, realize the cooperation and mutual assistance of governance subjects, and boost the long-term governance of urban pluvial flooding problem. Therefore, the holistic governance of urban pluvial flooding is not only a technical issue, but also an innovation and remodeling of the traditional governance model.
6. Realization Path of Holistic Governance Model for Urban Pluvial Flooding Governance Fragmentation Dilemma
Based on the above analysis of the fragmentation of urban pluvial flooding governance, we know that the fragmentation of the governance model is mainly influenced by both the fragmentation of urban pluvial flooding governance subjects and the fragmentation of the governance mechanism. Therefore, in order to break through the fragmentation of urban pluvial flooding management, the government should take the theory of holistic governance as the core, focus on establishing a coordination and cooperation mechanism, and use information technology as a breakthrough to create a mature model of holistic urban pluvial flooding governance. This paper proposes the following four realization paths and countermeasures.
6.1. Forming a Governance Network with the Participation of Multiple Subjects
The key to the holistic governance of urban pluvial flooding lies in the transformation of the governance system, which focuses on the formation of a multifaceted dynamic governance structure with compatibility, and the dynamic adjustment of governance power and resources within organizations, formal and informal organizations, and between government and society, so as to improve and enrich the governance subjects on the one hand, and optimize the governance relationship and governance path on the other. Enhancing the quality of public services and diversifying governance subjects are the key ways to practice holistic governance theory. The most basic thing is that government departments need to break the shackles of the old single model, not just listen to the words of the government body, to create an efficient service-oriented governance mechanism. In the new framework of multi-disciplinary governance of urban pluvial flooding, the government further plays the role of an organizer and coordinator, and actively eliminates the obstacles in the governance network, so that each governance subject can express its own views. At the same time, it is necessary to break the shackles of internal closure of government organizations, deepen the cooperation mechanism of government departments at all levels, and promote and deepen the coordination and cooperation among different departments. In terms of social groups, under the new institutional environment, the government should actively encourage citizens to contribute to urban water flooding governance, treating them as participants rather than passive receivers and treating urban water flooding governance as a common matter for all. The government, society and the market should form a close connection mechanism, and strive to seamlessly integrate the work of each other [38
], eventually forming an effective model of urban pluvial flooding governance.
6.2. Promote Organizational Restructuring and Reform to Create a Synergistic Operation Mechanism
In the framework of functional and hierarchical division, the heterogeneity of governmental organizations and departments is caused by the overly specialized division of labor, and the different roles and responsibilities of institutions and their interests, resulting in the deviation of governance mechanisms from governance objectives. Holistic governance theory advocates process reengineering of the organization, integration and innovation of departments with similar functions, and clarification of vertical and horizontal communication paths between departments to fundamentally solve the problem of blurred boundaries of management functions.
Firstly, it is important toestablish diverse channels of consultation and create an effective mechanism for dialogue. Specifically, the Water Affairs Bureau in the city needs to be the leader, fully mobilize the departments responsible for organizing joint meetings to exchange and discuss the management of urban flooding, brainstorming. At the same time, the emergency management office should pay great attention to the daily supervision and management of emergency, clarify the responsibilities and rights within the organization, pay attention to the interface between the competences of relevant departments, and create a closed supervision loop.
Secondly, it is important to form a scientific benefit-sharing mechanism. The division and adjustment of responsibilities cannot cure the fragmentation of urban pluvial flooding governance system, but the common interests of all parties are the core driving force of governance actions. Therefore, the interests of various departments should be weighed and analyzed, and a reasonable benefit and risk sharing mechanism should be established, such as setting up a cross-border urban pluvial flooding governance fund to share the cost reasonably based on the size of the governance responsibilities and roles.
At the beginning of the transformation of urban stormwater flooding governance, the policy environment will not be very mature in all aspects. Therefore, the government should give full play to its role as an exemplary model. Drawing on the experience of the establishment of the “New York City Panel on Climate Change” [59
], the organization of urban pluvial flooding governance transition should also be sustained and regularized. Additionally, an urban pluvial flooding governance office can be created in a targeted manner, with the participation of representatives from various parties including government, market, and public to enhance the ability to make comprehensive decisions and to propose feasible action plans for the actual situation in the subsequent emergency response, so that measures can be taken to address the risk of urban pluvial flooding.
6.3. Forming a Data Sharing Network Platform and Creating a Unified Governance Information Center
The smooth implementation of urban pluvial flooding governance needs to be based on the acquisition of comprehensive and correct information for decision making, therefore, the first-hand information of each department should be summarized continuously to avoid the problem of inefficient decision making and resource allocation due to information asymmetry. In terms of the current vertical local management in China, the actual disaster summary and reporting process at the governmental level is easily influenced by human factors, resulting in distorted information and delayed reporting, while there is no effective information transmission path between horizontal departments.
Technology is not neutral, and in some cases it is influenced by social and political factors in order to achieve different goals. The holistic urban pluvial flooding governance model advocates the use of advanced information technology to establish cross-departmental and cross-regional information exchange and sharing mechanisms, and promote the sharing and integration of information among different levels and departments to provide data support for urban pluvial flooding governance decisions. Typical technologies include intelligent cloud platforms and full-process dynamic network platforms, which can collect a wide range of data related to monitoring and forecasting, disaster resilience and vulnerability for reference by decision makers.
In order to establish a smooth information flow path, the first step is to realize the openness and sharing of data. There are two main ways. The first way is to link to government portals, public data for the general public, and portable platforms such as APPs launched by companies to target weather conditions. Another way is to set up a specialized database within the organization, with internal networking for more private or IP-related data. Public databases and specialized databases will constitute the core data sources of the basic data platform. On the basis of the data support for the establishment of urban pluvial management linkage command platform, fully involved in the city and even individual neighborhoods. The first step is to summarize the relevant data from the city, district, and even the street, and then integrate the data into the information storage center. In the second step, the information is collected dynamically, screened and evaluated by means of a unique information query language, and aggregated by category. In the third step, the collected information is identified, disposed and transferred to form an integrated platform of urban flood monitoring, early warning and management. Among all the data system levels, the urban storm and flood control linkage command platform is the highest level, which can effectively integrate all kinds of internal and external data and provide easy entrance for other basic data to achieve the effect of “vertical to the end and horizontal to the edge”. According to the above, the information platform of urban pluvial flooding governance can meet the innovative governance needs at different levels: firstly, it breaks the information silo and provides a way for data flow; secondly, it realizes real-time update of data and provides guidance for decision making; thirdly, it enhances the efficiency of execution linkage and action response, and has reference significance for the governance of other urban problems.
6.4. Establishing Monitoring, Administrative Performance, and Legal System
The holistic governance of urban pluvial flooding is a typical collective action, but in collective action, rational, self-interested individuals will not act to achieve the common good. The existence of clear rules for urban pluvial flooding governance ultimately benefits all members of the organization and can even benefit society as a whole. Accordingly, the implementation of holistic governance of urban pluvial flooding is also dependent on the construction of relevant systems.
Firstly, it is important to establish a monitoring system for the holistic governance of urban pluvial flooding. The National Flood Control and Drought Relief Command is in the leading position and needs to play a leading role in communicating with various departments to set the goals of urban pluvial flood control, and establish an accountability mechanism with clear power and responsibility beforehand and accountability afterwards. The holistic governance of urban pluvial flooding is a highly complex task, which involves not only the supervision of the upper level government and the mutual supervision of the horizontal departments, but also the supervision of many subjects such as the press and the public, and the integration of various forms of supervision and supervision systems to create a perfect supervision system.
Secondly, a mature assessment and evaluation and reward system is introduced with the basic principle of holistic governance of urban pluvial flooding. In the early stage of urban pluvial flooding governance transition, a top-down administrative performance assessment and incentive model should be implemented to provide motivation for active cooperation of actors at all levels. Therefore, the current Gross National Product-centered performance appraisal system should be changed to fully incorporate indicators related to urban pluvial flooding governance [23
]. In the holistic governance of urban pluvial flooding, positive incentives and negative penalties should be combined, under the continuous influence of the positive incentive system, to deepen the cooperation mechanism of the governance bodies; timely correction of problems and penalties, to prevent people from floating in the process of governance. In particular, punitive measures will strengthen urban flood managers to pay attention to the implementation of various institutional measures, and will also involve various stakeholders in all aspects of urban pluvial flooding governance [16
Thirdly, it is important to create a healthy legal system, to provide a good legal environment for the development of urban pluvial flooding governance work. Specifically, the most basic thing is to deepen the legal system related to urban pluvial flooding governance, and take the high-ranking law as a breakthrough to implement the governance process. In addition, it is necessary to update urban planning standards in a timely manner, taking into account the real environment and actual needs, and to reasonably delineate the scope of application of urban planning standards, so as to better realize the articulation of urban planning and laws and regulations.
Urban pluvial flooding in China has become one of the major challenges for sustainable development, and how to effectively manage urban pluvial flooding is a development issue that urban policy makers need to face head-on [16
]. The holistic governance of urban pluvial flooding in China has undergone several changes, from the initial emphasis on the construction of drainage and flood control facilities, to the implementation of sponge measures such as infiltration, retention, storage, purification, utilization and drainage, to the comprehensive management and systemic management model, i.e., basin-wide, city-wide, process-wide, society-wide, element-wide, all-round, phased and focused multi-dimensional management [23
]. The holistic governance of urban pluvial flooding emphasizes an integrated and systematic approach to solving the problem of urban pluvial flooding, and also reflects a dynamic, holistic, perpetual and thinking approach, with clear governance objectives and governance measures that require technology empowerment, increased investment, departmental synergy, localization, and a comprehensive system response to a city.
At the same time, we must recognize that the risk of urban flooding is also evolving [48
]. On the one hand, as China’s urbanization continues to advance, population and wealth continue to cluster in cities, and the population and wealth exposed to flooding risks are increasing accordingly [16
]. On the other hand, global changes and climate warming have increased the flood-prone urban space and the possibility of flooding [46
]. Additionally, the widespread application of new materials, new energy and new technologies, and the emergence of new industries, new business models and new fields make the urban operation system increasingly complex and the types of risks are increasing. Urban flooding will not only cause casualties and economic losses, but also trigger derivative and secondary disasters. Therefore, how are we to really change the dilemma of “urban sea-viewing”? Firstly, we must correct the input understanding. To change the misconception that there is no return on investment in disaster prevention, recognize the importance and urgency of the work of managing urban pluvial flooding. Reducing disaster losses is necessary to increase social wealth [29
]. Urban pluvial flooding governance is a matter of people’s lives and property security, is not only a project relevant to people’s livelihood, but also a major development project. Secondly, we must strengthen the application of research. Generally speaking, the deeper the waterlogging, the more serious the disaster. Since the geographical conditions, development stages, and social culture vary widely across China, it is difficult to characterize this law with uniform parameters, yet it is indispensable in the risk assessment of flooding in specific cities. Unfortunately, there is little case study accumulation in this area. Thirdly, we must recognize the importance of risk assessment. The risk assessment of urban pluvial flooding is the basic work of urban pluvial flooding governance, and it is also a relatively strong technical work. We should make full use of the information and results of the first national comprehensive risk census of natural disasters being carried out in China, and use remote sensing, and artificial intelligence technologies to systematically and deeply carry out the risk assessment of urban pluvial flooding based on large scale base maps with the help of expert team strength. Fourthly, we must strengthen publicity and education. We should use online and offline, physical and virtual, traditional media and new media and other ways and means to promote the significance, importance and methods of urban pluvial flooding prevention and control, and comprehensively enhance the awareness of urban pluvial flood risk prevention.