Next Article in Journal
Impact of Geology on Seasonal Hydrological Predictability in Alpine Regions by a Sensitivity Analysis Framework
Previous Article in Journal
Determination of Actual Evapotranspiration and Crop Coefficients of California Date Palms Using the Residual of Energy Balance Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Numerical Simulation of the Sound Field of a Five-Stage Centrifugal Pump with Different Turbulence Models
Open AccessArticle

Physical Modelling of Arctic Coastlines—Progress and Limitations

Leichtweiß-Institute for Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Centre Eau Terre Environnement, INRS, Québec, QC G1P 4S5, Canada
Coastal Research Center, Technische Universität Braunschweig and Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30419 Hannover, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2020, 12(8), 2254;
Received: 26 May 2020 / Revised: 18 July 2020 / Accepted: 4 August 2020 / Published: 11 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Model Strategies in Hydraulics)
Permafrost coastlines represent a large portion of the world’s coastal area and these areas have become increasingly vulnerable in the face of climate change. The predominant mechanism of coastal erosion in these areas has been identified through several observational studies as thermomechanical erosion—a joint removal of sediment through the melting of interstitial ice (thermal energy) and abrasion from incoming waves (mechanical energy). However, further developments are needed looking how common design parameters in coastal engineering (such as wave height, period, sediment size, etc.) contribute to the process. This paper presents the current state of the art with the objective of establishing the necessary research background to develop a process-based approach to predicting permafrost erosion. To that end, an overarching framework is presented that includes all major, erosion-relevant processes, while delineating means to accomplish permafrost modelling in experimental studies. Preliminary modelling of generations zero and one models, within this novel framework, was also performed to allow for early conclusions as to how well permafrost erosion can currently be modelled without more sophisticated setups. View Full-Text
Keywords: permafrost; erosion; coastal erosion; experimental modelling permafrost; erosion; coastal erosion; experimental modelling
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Korte, S.; Gieschen, R.; Stolle, J.; Goseberg, N. Physical Modelling of Arctic Coastlines—Progress and Limitations. Water 2020, 12, 2254.

AMA Style

Korte S, Gieschen R, Stolle J, Goseberg N. Physical Modelling of Arctic Coastlines—Progress and Limitations. Water. 2020; 12(8):2254.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Korte, Sophia; Gieschen, Rebekka; Stolle, Jacob; Goseberg, Nils. 2020. "Physical Modelling of Arctic Coastlines—Progress and Limitations" Water 12, no. 8: 2254.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop