Next Article in Journal
Quantification and Characterization of Antimicrobial Resistance in Greywater Discharged to the Environment
Next Article in Special Issue
An Extended Ecosystem Model for Understanding EE2 Indirect Effects on a Freshwater Food Web and its Ecosystem Function Resilience
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment and Valuation of Groundwater Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Handan City, China
Article

Ecosystem Metabolism in Small Ponds: The Effects of Floating-Leaved Macrophytes

1
Department of Environmental Studies, Macalester College, St. Paul, MN 55113, USA
2
Department of Biology, Augsburg University, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA
3
Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota—Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2020, 12(5), 1458; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051458
Received: 9 April 2020 / Revised: 16 May 2020 / Accepted: 18 May 2020 / Published: 20 May 2020
Small ponds constitute a significant number of standing water bodies on earth and may contribute to CO2 uptake or release into the atmosphere. Despite their importance, few studies have examined ecosystem metabolism in ponds, especially in ponds that may be dominated by floating-leaved macrophytes. In this study, we examined ecosystem metabolism by measuring changes in dissolved oxygen levels every 10 min from late May through late October for four shallow ponds (0.5–1.5 m) in east-central Minnesota, USA. Ponds had varying levels of floating-leaved macrophytes from sparse (<1% coverage) to abundant (61% coverage). We found significant differences in a number of physical/chemical factors including P, N, DOC, water temperature and light penetration. We also found significant difference in gross primary production (GPP—average ranged from 2.2 to 5.5 mg O2/L/day), respiration (R—average ranged from −6.8 to −3.6 mg O2/L/day) and net ecosystem production (NEP—average ranged from −1.5 to −0.1 mg O2/L/day) among the ponds. On average, all of the ponds were heterotrophic (R > GPP). While it appeared that floating-leaved macrophytes provided a significant impact on ecosystem metabolism, there was not a one-to-one correspondence between the amount of macrophytes and the level of ecosystem metabolism. View Full-Text
Keywords: ecosystem metabolism; ponds; macrophytes ecosystem metabolism; ponds; macrophytes
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hornbach, D.J.; Schilling, E.G.; Kundel, H. Ecosystem Metabolism in Small Ponds: The Effects of Floating-Leaved Macrophytes. Water 2020, 12, 1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051458

AMA Style

Hornbach DJ, Schilling EG, Kundel H. Ecosystem Metabolism in Small Ponds: The Effects of Floating-Leaved Macrophytes. Water. 2020; 12(5):1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051458

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hornbach, Daniel J., Emily G. Schilling, and Holly Kundel. 2020. "Ecosystem Metabolism in Small Ponds: The Effects of Floating-Leaved Macrophytes" Water 12, no. 5: 1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051458

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop