Next Article in Journal
Twenty-First Century Streamflow and Climate Change in Forest Catchments of the Central Appalachian Mountains Region, US
Next Article in Special Issue
Impacts of Channel Network Type on the Unit Hydrograph
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Wave Overtopping of Barriers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dam Operation for Mitigating Ice Jam Flooding Risks under the Adjustment of River Channel-Forms: Implications from an Evaluation in the Ningxia-Inner Mongolia Reach of the Upper Yellow River, China
Open AccessArticle

Analysis of Hydrograph Shape Affected by Flow-Direction Assumptions in Rainfall-Runoff Models

Center of Excellence for Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202, Taiwan
Water 2020, 12(2), 452; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020452
Received: 23 December 2019 / Revised: 3 February 2020 / Accepted: 7 February 2020 / Published: 8 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hydro-Geomorphological Understanding and Modeling)
Different approaches for flow-direction determination have been continuously proposed to perform a more realistic simulation of surface runoff, yet the diversity of the existing methods causes significant differences in the extractions of geomorphic parameters as well as the results of rainfall-runoff simulations. In this study, the three most widely used flow-direction methods were separately applied in hydrological models to thoroughly investigate their effects on the simulation output. The results show that the drainage area is a significant factor that affects not only the flow-collecting ability but also the time to peak discharge; however, the definition and calculation of the drainage area become different when the consideration of multiple flow directions is involved in a terrain analysis. This study adopted two area indexes, flow concentration area and flow dispersion area, to understand their consequences in the aspects of the flow volume of simulated hydrograph and the delay of time to peak discharge. The multiple-flow-direction methods show the later time to flow peak and less amount of outflow volume in comparison with the single flow-direction method. By merely extracting two area indexes, a transformation approach is suggested to predict hydrograph shape and to quantify the extent of hydrograph deviations induced by using different flow-direction methods. View Full-Text
Keywords: single-flow-direction method; multiple-flow-direction method; digital elevation model; distributed rainfall-runoff model; hydrograph shape single-flow-direction method; multiple-flow-direction method; digital elevation model; distributed rainfall-runoff model; hydrograph shape
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, P.-C. Analysis of Hydrograph Shape Affected by Flow-Direction Assumptions in Rainfall-Runoff Models. Water 2020, 12, 452.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop