Next Article in Journal
Novel Hybrid Data-Intelligence Model for Forecasting Monthly Rainfall with Uncertainty Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Ultrasound-Assisted Treatment of Landfill Leachate in a Sequencing Batch Reactor
Previous Article in Journal
Water Governance in Cities: Current Trends and Future Challenges
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainability Analysis of Alternative Long-Term Management Strategies for Water Supply Systems: A Case Study in Reggio Emilia (Italy)
Open AccessArticle

The Application of Multi-Criteria Analysis Methods for the Determination of Priorities in the Implementation of Irrigation Plans

1
Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Rijeka, Rijeka 51 000, Croatia
2
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek 31 000, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(3), 501; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030501
Received: 27 December 2018 / Revised: 8 February 2019 / Accepted: 5 March 2019 / Published: 10 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insights on the Water–Energy–Food Nexus)
Irrigated agriculture has considerable impacts on the environment. To minimize negative effects and maximize positive effects, it is necessary to provide comprehensive analyses beyond the strictly technical domain. In this study, we apply a methodology for determining priorities in implementing irrigation plans using multi-criteria analysis methods on a specific case study area in the sub-catchment area of the Orljava River in Požega–Slavonia County, Croatia. Five potential irrigation areas (Orljava–Londža, Pleternica, Ovčare, Treštanovci, and Venje–Hrnjevac) were analyzed according to five selected criteria: environmental protection, water-related (four sub-criteria), social, economic, and time criteria with different criteria importance (weight). The aim of this study was to confirm the adequacy of using six multi-criteria analysis (MCA) methods (mostly used: PROMETHEE, AHP, ELECTRE TRI, and the less used: DEXi, PRIME, and PCA) in determining priorities for fulfilling irrigation plans, present models for preparation of the input data, apply certain methods, and compare the results on the selected case study area. The methods’ adequacy was confirmed during the research. Five of the six MCA methods identified the Ovčare area as the most appropriate for irrigation development (i.e., it has priority in implementing the irrigation plan). According to one (AHP) of the six methods, Orljava–Londža has more advantages over other areas. All MCA methods, except PCA, chose Venje–Hrnjevac as the least advisable (last to be implemented) alternative. Conclusions from this research confirm findings from recently published research regarding the application of MCA on water management problems. View Full-Text
Keywords: multi-criteria analysis; priority; irrigation plans implementation multi-criteria analysis; priority; irrigation plans implementation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Karleuša, B.; Hajdinger, A.; Tadić, L. The Application of Multi-Criteria Analysis Methods for the Determination of Priorities in the Implementation of Irrigation Plans. Water 2019, 11, 501.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop