Spatio-Temporal Variations in Farmland Water Conditions in the Yanhe River Basin
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Study Area
3. Data Sources and Methods
3.1. Data Sources
3.2. Research Methods
3.2.1. Potential Evapotranspiration (ET0)
3.2.2. Crop Water Requirement (ETc)
3.2.3. Moisture Profit and Loss Degree (MPLD) Model
3.2.4. Correlation Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Analysis of Interannual Moisture Profit and Loss Degree
4.1.1. Moisture Profit and Loss Situation and Changes
4.1.2. Characteristics of Moisture Profit and Loss Transition
4.1.3. Variation Trend of Moisture Profit and Loss Degree
4.2. Spatial Distribution of Moisture Profit and Loss
5. Discussion
5.1. Factors Influencing MPLD Changes
5.1.1. Factors Influencing MPLD Changes
5.1.2. Changes in Impact Factors in Different Years
5.1.3. Spatial Performance of Impact Factors on MPLD
5.2. Comparison with Previous Research
5.3. Suggestions of Mitigating Water Shortages
5.4. Uncertainty
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Meteorological Parameters of the Penman–Monteith Formula
- Mean saturation vapor pressure (es)
- 2.
- Slope of saturation vapor pressure curve (Δ)
- 3.
- Actual vapor pressure (ea) derived from relative humidity data
- 4.
- Net radiation (Rn)
- 5.
- Soil heat flux (G)
- 6.
- Psychrometric constant (γ)
- 7.
- Air Temperature
- 8.
- Wind profile relationship
Appendix B. Actual Evapotranspiration (ETa)
References
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2013; p. 1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labat, D.; Goddéris, Y.; Probst, J.L.; Guyot, J.L. Evidence for global runoff increase related to climate warming. Adv. Water Resour. 2004, 27, 631–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Q.; Luo, Y.; Xu, Y.-P.; Tian, Y.; Yang, T. Satellite soil moisture for agricultural drought monitoring: Assessment of SMAP-derived soil water deficit index in Xiang River Basin, China. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, L.; Liu, X.; Ma, X.-Y. Spatiotemporal distribution of rainfall erosivity in the Yanhe River watershed of hilly and gully region, Chinese Loess Plateau. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, R.-J.; Fu, B.-J.; Liu, G.-H.; Ma, K.-M. Research on the relationship between water and eco-environment construction in Loess Hilly and Gully regions. Huanjing Kexue 2004, 25, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Zhen, L. The national census for soil erosion and dynamic analysis in China. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 2013, 1, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, L.; Potter, N.; Hickel, K.; Zhang, Y.; Shao, Q. Water balance modeling over variable time scales based on the Budyko framework—Model development and testing. J. Hydrol. 2008, 360, 117–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piao, S.; Ciais, P.; Huang, Y.; Shen, Z.; Peng, S.; Li, J.; Zhou, L.; Liu, H.; Ma, Y.; Ding, Y.; et al. The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China. Nature 2010, 467, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L.S.; Raes, D.; Smith, M. Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements; FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Trajkovic, S. Hargreaves versus Penman-Monteith under humid conditions. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2007, 133, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, Y.; Wu, S.; Zheng, D.; Yang, Q. Radiation calibration of FAO56 Penman–Monteith model to estimate reference crop evapotranspiration in China. Agric. Water Manag. 2008, 95, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deliang, C.; Ge, G.; Chong-Yu, X.; Jun, G.; Guoyu, R. Comparison of the Thornthwaite method and pan data with the standard Penman-Monteith estimates of reference evapotranspiration in China. Clim. Res. 2005, 28, 123–132. [Google Scholar]
- Sumner, D.M.; Jacobs, J.M. Utility of Penman–Monteith, Priestley–Taylor, reference evapotranspiration, and pan evaporation methods to estimate pasture evapotranspiration. J. Hydrol. 2005, 308, 81–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ai, Z.; Yang, Y. Modification and validation of Priestley–Taylor model for estimating cotton evapotranspiration under plastic mulch condition. J. Hydrometeorol. 2016, 17, 1281–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kashyap, P.S.; Panda, R.K. Evaluation of evapotranspiration estimation methods and development of crop-coefficients for potato crop in a sub-humid region. Agric. Water Manag. 2001, 50, 9–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaozhong, K.; Huanjie, C.; Jianhua, Z. Estimation of maize evapotranspiration under water deficits in a semiarid region. Agric. Water Manag. 2000, 43, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Croitoru, A.-E.; Piticar, A.; Dragotă, C.S.; Burada, D.C. Recent changes in reference evapotranspiration in Romania. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2013, 111, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelhadi, A.W.; Hata, T.; Tanakamaru, H.; Tada, A.; Tariq, M.A. Estimation of crop water requirements in arid region using Penman–Monteith equation with derived crop coefficients: A case study on Acala cotton in Sudan Gezira irrigated scheme. Agric. Water Manag. 2000, 45, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ai, Z.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Q.X.; Manevski, K.; Wang, Q.; Hu, Q.; Eer, D.; Wang, J. Characteristics and influencing factors of crop coefficient for drip-irrigated cotton under plastic mulch conditions in arid environment. J. Agric. Meteorol. 2017, 74, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, R.G. Using the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient method over an irrigated region as part of an evapotranspiration intercomparison study. J. Hydrol. 2000, 229, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, L.; Kang, S.; Zhang, L. Temporal and spatial variations of evapotranspiration for spring wheat in the Shiyang river basin in northwest China. Agric. Water Manag. 2007, 87, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howell, T.A.; Evett, S.R. The Penman-Monteith method. In Evapotranspiration: Determination of Consumptive Use in Water Rights Proceedings; Continuing Legal Education in Colorado, Inc.: Denver, CO, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Mahmood, R.; Hubbard, K.G. Simulating sensitivity of soil moisture and evapotranspiration under heterogeneous soils and land uses. J. Hydrol. 2003, 280, 72–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubio, J.G.; Belmonte, A.C.; Enguita, L.F.; Alcázar, I.A.; Mancebo, M.B.; Campos, I.; Rubio, R.B. Remote sensing-based soil water balance for irrigation water accounting at the Spanish Iberian Peninsula. Proc. Int. Assoc. Hydrol. Sci. 2018, 380, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
- Bandyopadhyay, P.K.; Mallick, S. Actual evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under varying moisture levels of humid tropical canal command area. Agric. Water Manag. 2003, 59, 33–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, A.H.D.C. Determining regional actual evapotranspiration of irrigated crops and natural vegetation in the São Francisco River Basin (Brazil) using remote sensing and Penman-Monteith equation. Remote Sens. 2010, 2, 1287–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narasimhan, B.; Srinivasan, R. Development and evaluation of Soil Moisture Deficit Index (SMDI) and Evapotranspiration Deficit Index (ETDI) for agricultural drought monitoring. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2005, 133, 69–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, A.; Trenberth, K.E.; Qian, T. A global dataset of palmer drought severity index for 1870–2002: Relationship with soil moisture and effects of surface warming. J. Hydrometeorol. 2004, 5, 1117–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, L.; Xu, C.-Y.; Chen, D.; Halldin, S.; Chen, Y.D. Sensitivity of the Penman–Monteith reference evapotranspiration to key climatic variables in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) basin. J. Hydrol. 2006, 329, 620–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kruijt, B.; Witte, J.-P.M.; Jacobs, C.M.J.; Kroon, T. Effects of rising atmospheric CO2 on evapotranspiration and soil moisture: A practical approach for the Netherlands. J. Hydrol. 2008, 349, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zhou, Z. Landscape pattern and hydrological processes in Yanhe River basin of China. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2014, 69, 933–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Z.; Fu, B.; Feng, X. GIS-based analysis for hotspot identification of tradeoff between ecosystem services: A case study in Yanhe Basin, China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2016, 26, 466–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zheng, Z.; Fu, B.; Hu, H.; Sun, G. A method to identify the variable ecosystem services relationship across time: A case study on Yanhe Basin, China. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29, 1689–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EARTHDATA. Available online: https://earthdata.nasa.gov/ (accessed on 10 June 2018).
- China Meteorological Data(CMD). Available online: http://data.cma.cn/ (accessed on 23 June 2018).
- He, J.; Yang, K. China Meteorological Forcing Dataset; Cold and Arid Regions Science Data Center at Lanzhou: Lanzhou, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Available online: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/ (accessed on 8 July 2018).
- Senay, G.B.; Bohms, S.; Singh, R.K.; Gowda, P.H.; Velpuri, N.M.; Alemu, H.; Verdin, J.P. Operational evapotranspiration mapping using remote sensing and weather datasets: A new parameterization for the SSEB approach. JAWRA 2013, 49, 577–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chinese Academy of Sciences. The Data Center for Resources and Environmental Sciences (DCRES). Available online: http://www.resdc.cn/ (accessed on 1 June 2018).
- Torres, A.F.; Walker, W.R.; McKee, M. Forecasting daily potential evapotranspiration using machine learning and limited climatic data. Agric. Water Manag. 2011, 98, 553–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, R.; Smith, M.; Pereira, L.; Pruitt, W.O. Proposed revision to the FAO procedure for estimating crop water requirements. Acta Hortic. 1997, 449, 17–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senay, G.B. Modeling landscape evapotranspiration by integrating land surface phenology and a water balance algorithm. Algorithms 2008, 1, 52–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Shao, Q.; Peng, S.; Xing, W.; Yang, T.; Luo, Y.; Yong, B.; Xu, J. Reference evapotranspiration change and the causes across the Yellow River Basin during 1957–2008 and their spatial and seasonal differences. Water Resour. Res. 2012, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, G.; Chen, D.; Ren, G.; Chen, Y.; Liao, Y. Spatial and temporal variations and controlling factors of potential evapotranspiration in China: 1956–2000. J. Geogr. Sci. 2006, 16, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huo, Z.; Dai, X.; Feng, S.; Kang, S.; Huang, G. Effect of climate change on reference evapotranspiration and aridity index in arid region of China. J. Hydrol. 2013, 492, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Zhang, D. Trend analysis of reference evapotranspiration in Northwest China: The roles of changing wind speed and surface air temperature. Hydrol. Process. 2013, 27, 3941–3948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Wu, P.T.; Li, X.L.; Zhou, T.W.; Sun, S.K.; Wang, Y.B.; Luan, X.B.; Yu, X. Spatial and temporal evolution of climatic factors and its impacts on potential evapotranspiration in Loess Plateau of Northern Shaanxi, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 589, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ning, T.; Li, Z.; Liu, W.; Han, X. Evolution of potential evapotranspiration in the northern Loess Plateau of China: Recent trends and climatic drivers. Int. J. Climatol. 2016, 36, 4019–4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Liu, X.; Hong, H. Assessing the effect of climate change on reference evapotranspiration in China. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2013, 27, 1871–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Yang, Z.; Cui, B. Spatial and temporal variability of annual precipitation during 1961–2006 in Yellow River Basin, China. J. Hydrol. 2008, 361, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Q.; Deng, X.; Wu, F.; Li, Z.; Song, W. Participatory irrigation management and irrigation water use efficiency in maize production: Evidence from Zhangye City, Northwestern China. Water 2017, 9, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferguson, C.R.; Sheffield, J.; Wood, E.F.; Gao, H. Quantifying uncertainty in a remote sensing-based estimate of evapotranspiration over continental USA. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2010, 31, 3821–3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glenn, E.P.; Huete, A.R.; Nagler, P.L.; Hirschboeck, K.K.; Brown, P. integrating remote sensing and ground methods to estimate evapotranspiration. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2007, 26, 139–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalma, J.D.; McVicar, T.R.; McCabe, M.F. Estimating land surface evaporation: A review of methods using remotely sensed surface temperature data. Surv. Geophys. 2008, 29, 421–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Senay, G.B.; Singh, R.K.; Verdin, J.P. Uncertainty analysis of the Operational Simplified Surface Energy Balance (SSEBop) model at multiple flux tower sites. J. Hydrol. 2016, 536, 384–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hulley, G.C.; Hughes, C.G.; Hook, S.J. Quantifying uncertainties in land surface temperature and emissivity retrievals from ASTER and MODIS thermal infrared data. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2012, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, X.; Xie, H. A review on applications of remote sensing and geographic information systems (GIS) in water resources and flood risk management. Water 2018, 10, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Song, W.; Deng, X. Spatiotemporal patterns of crop irrigation water requirements in the Heihe River Basin, China. Water 2017, 9, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2003 | 2015 | 2003–2015 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Area | Proportion | Area | Proportion | Variation Quantity | Variation Rate | |
Normal water shortage | 879 | 29.61 | 93 | 3.04 | –786 | –89.42 |
Mild water shortage | 1034 | 34.83 | 485 | 15.85 | –549 | –53.09 |
Moderate water shortage | 687 | 23.14 | 757 | 24.75 | 70 | 10.19 |
Severe water shortage | 251 | 8.45 | 594 | 19.42 | 343 | 136.65 |
Acute water shortage | 118 | 3.97 | 1130 | 36.94 | 1,012 | 857.63 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, Z.; Song, W.; Yuan, X.; Yin, L. Spatio-Temporal Variations in Farmland Water Conditions in the Yanhe River Basin. Water 2019, 11, 2234. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112234
Wang Z, Song W, Yuan X, Yin L. Spatio-Temporal Variations in Farmland Water Conditions in the Yanhe River Basin. Water. 2019; 11(11):2234. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112234
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Zhanyun, Wei Song, Xuefeng Yuan, and Lichang Yin. 2019. "Spatio-Temporal Variations in Farmland Water Conditions in the Yanhe River Basin" Water 11, no. 11: 2234. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112234