Next Article in Journal
Flood Classification Based on a Fuzzy Clustering Iteration Model with Combined Weight and an Immune Grey Wolf Optimizer Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
Assimilation of Synthetic SWOT River Depths in a Regional Hydrometeorological Model
Article Menu
Issue 1 (January) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2019, 11(1), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010079

Evaluation of Return Period and Risk in Bivariate Non-Stationary Flood Frequency Analysis

1
School of Hydropower and Information Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
2
Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research, Changjiang Water Resources Commission, Wuhan 430010, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 1 December 2018 / Revised: 22 December 2018 / Accepted: 27 December 2018 / Published: 4 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Water Resources Management and Governance)
  |  
PDF [2347 KB, uploaded 4 January 2019]
  |  

Abstract

The concept of a traditional return period has long been questioned in non-stationary studies, and the risk of failure was recommended to evaluate the design events in flood modeling. However, few studies have been done in terms of multivariate cases. To investigate the impact of non-stationarity on the streamflow series, the Yichang station in the Yangtze River was taken as a case study. A time varying copula model was constructed for bivariate modeling of flood peak and 7-day flood volume, and the non-stationary return period and risk of failure were applied to compare the results between stationary and non-stationary models. The results demonstrated that the streamflow series at the Yichang station showed significant non-stationary properties. The flood peak and volume series presented decreasing trends in their location parameters and the dependence structure between them also weakened over time. The conclusions of the bivariate non-stationary return period and risk of failure were different depending on the design flood event. In the event that both flood peak and volume are exceeding, the flood risk is smaller with the non-stationary model, which is a joint effect of the time varying marginal distribution and copula function. While in the event that either flood peak or volume exceed, the effect of non-stationary properties is almost negligible. As for the design values, the non-stationary model is characterized by a higher flood peak and lower flood volume. These conclusions may be helpful in long-term decision making in the Yangtze River basin under non-stationary conditions. View Full-Text
Keywords: non-stationarity; flood frequency analysis; time varying copula; risk of failure; return period non-stationarity; flood frequency analysis; time varying copula; risk of failure; return period
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, L.; Jiang, S.; Hu, X.; Li, C. Evaluation of Return Period and Risk in Bivariate Non-Stationary Flood Frequency Analysis. Water 2019, 11, 79.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top