Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Multiple Typhoons on Severe Floods in the Mid-Latitude Region (Hokkaido)
Next Article in Special Issue
Multivariate and Spatial Analysis of Physicochemical Parameters in an Irrigation District, Chihuahua, Mexico
Previous Article in Journal
Detection of Infectious Noroviruses from Wastewater and Seawater Using PEMAXTM Treatment Combined with RT-qPCR
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Time Nonlocal Transport Models for Characterizing Non-Fickian Transport: From Mathematical Interpretation to Laboratory Application
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Water
Volume 10
Issue 7
10.3390/w10070842
water-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spatial Pattern of Bacterial Community Diversity Formed in Different Groundwater Field Corresponding to Electron Donors and Acceptors Distributions at a Petroleum-Contaminated Site

by
Zhuo Ning
1,2,3,
Min Zhang
1,*,
Ze He
1,3,
Pingping Cai
1,4,
Caijuan Guo
1 and
Ping Wang
1,2,3
1
Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
2
School of Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
3
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Remediation of Hebei Province, Zhengding 050083, China
4
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, HeFei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2018, 10(7), 842; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10070842
Received: 27 March 2018 / Revised: 7 May 2018 / Accepted: 22 June 2018 / Published: 25 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Groundwater Contamination and Remediation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The benefits of an electron-transfer mechanism for petroleum biodegrading have been widely acknowledged, but few have studied the spatial pattern of microbial community diversity in groundwater fields, and few discuss the bacterial community’s diversity in relation to electron donors-acceptors distribution, which is largely determined by groundwater flow. Eleven samples in different groundwater fields are collected at a petroleum-contaminated site, and the microbial communities are investigated using 16S rRNA gene sequences with multivariate statistics. These are mainly linked to the chemical composition analysis of electron donor indexes COD, BTEX and electron acceptor indexes DO, NO3−, Fe2+, Mn2+, and SO42−, HCO3−. The spatial pattern of the bacterial community’s diversity is characterized and the effect of the electron redox reaction on bacterial community formation in different groundwater field zones is elucidated. It is found that a considerable percentage (>65%) of the bacterial communities related to petroleum degrading suggest that petroleum biodegrading is occurring in groundwater. The communities are subject to the redox reaction in different groundwater field zones: The side plume zone and the upstream of the source zone are under aerobic redox or denitrification redox, and the corresponding bacteria are Rhodoferax, Novosphingobium, Hydrogenophaga, and Comamonas; the source zone and downstream of the source zone are under Fe3+, Mn4+, and SO42− reduction redox, and the corresponding bacteria are Rhodoferax, Treponema, Desulfosporosinus, Hydrogenophaga, and Acidovorax. These results imply that groundwater flow plays a definitive role in the bacterial community’s diversity spatial pattern formation by influencing the distribution of electron donor and acceptor.

1. Introduction

Due to its toxicity to humans and other organisms, there is much concern about petroleum-contaminated groundwater [1,2]. Various methods, including pump-and-treat (PandT) and other in situ technologies have been used to remediate petroleum-contaminated groundwater [3]. As an environmentally sound and cost-effective technology in various applications, in situ bioremediation, especially natural attenuation, has gained considerable attention. During bioremediation, petroleum degrading microorganisms can mineralize petroleum components as their carbon source and electron donors, electron acceptors redox reaction occurs and the contaminants are removed [4]. Bacterial community diversity and electron-transfer research are essential for bioremediation [5,6].
Research on the diversity of bacterial communities has been carried out at petroleum-contaminated sites since the 1970s [7], and the amounts have grown rapidly as the 16S rRNA gene sequences mature and become universal; most were in soils and sediments [8,9,10,11,12]. A few researchers focusing on groundwater such as Anne Fahy and Zhaoxian Zheng, investigated the relationships between the bacterial community structures and the groundwater geochemistry respectively [13,14], and found that hydrocarbon metabolism would vary the diversity of the bacterial communities. Ai-xia Zhou researched the responses of microbial communities to seasonal fluctuations in groundwater level and found that groundwater-table fluctuations would affect the distribution, transport, and biodegradation of the contaminants [15]. Petroleum compounds can be transported from the source area in groundwater, with the result that the petroleum concentrations, redox conditions, biogeochemical processes, and bacterial communities would vary along the groundwater flow path [16]. This view can be supported by other related research, such as from Karolin Tischer, Etienne Yergeau and C.E. Main who have reported that contaminant concentrations have a significant influence on microbial communities in various environmental mediums [8,17,18]. During petroleum biodegradation, electron donors and acceptors dissolved in the groundwater are consumed. Generally speaking, electron acceptors are usually consumed in the following order: O2, NO3−, Mn4+, Fe3+, SO42−, and HCO3− (or CO2), and these electron acceptors, other than HCO3− (or CO2), are transported in groundwater from uncontaminated groundwater upstream under little vertical recharge conditions. The electron acceptors would be used according to their redox potential and the concentrations of electron acceptors often vary with the groundwater flow path in contaminated sites [19]. Research has shown that certain electron acceptors affect bacterial communities [20,21]. There is enough dissolved oxygen in the edge of contamination plume, and the bacteria are mainly aerobic, while in the source area the bacteria would mainly become methanogens and sulfate-reducing bacteria since the other electron acceptors were already exhausted [22]. There is not much doubt that redox zonation and microbial changes along the path of groundwater plumes are present.
However, for a petroleum-contaminated site bioremediation, microorganisms have cooperative and competitive relationships, not only along a groundwater path. To develop an effective remediation scheme, information about the abundance of petroleum degradation microorganisms from the overall bacterial community diversity is required. The spatial pattern of the diversity of the bacterial community in different groundwater fields of the entire contaminated groundwater area should be well described, and a particularly detailed response regarding the relationship between the bacterial community and electron-transfer will provide field case support for microbial functional gene identification.
Eleven groundwater samples from different places along and beside the groundwater flow path in a petroleum-contaminated aquifer were collected. Then high throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA genes was used to investigate the diversity of the bacterial communities in the samples. The relationships between the bacterial communities and the electron acceptors and donors in the different groundwater fields were assessed. The reasons for a different redox zonation are expected to be gained based on water geochemistry (electron acceptors and available hydrocarbons) and phylogenetic types of microorganisms in the groundwater.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description and Sampling Procedure

The contaminated site was located in the northern part of the North China Plain, which was formerly a chemical plant that was contaminated when petroleum leaked from a storage tank more than forty years ago. While the pollution had been removed from the surface, the groundwater and subsurface soils were still seriously contaminated. It reported that the main contaminates were monocyclic aromatics and aliphatic hydrocarbon. More than 11 wells were drilled in the site to survey and monitor the groundwater contamination and then remediate it. The samples were collected before the remediation. The aquifer at the site was mainly composed of sandy gravel and sand, and there was no clay layer to prevent contamination of the vadose zone. Previous studies reported that the contaminated aquifer was unconfined and the depth to the groundwater table was approximately 25 m. The groundwater naturally flowed from northwest to southeast, regionally. Since the site was located in the urban area where there was usage of groundwater, the flow direction varied slightly with time. The flow was from west to east on the sampling days in the site. An area of 400 m2 with 11 wells around the petroleum leak was established for the purposes of this study (Figure 1).
Information about the water temperature (t), pH, electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen (DO), and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) in each well was recorded before collecting the groundwater samples. The groundwater samples were considered to be representative when the values of T, pH, EC, DO, and ORP in three successive samples were within ±1 °C, ±0.2, ±3%, ±10% or ±0.2 mg/L, and ±20 mV, respectively. The groundwater samples were collected by sterile bailers. When sampling, groundwater 5 L was collected into a sterilized 5 L plastic bucket and stored on ice in an incubator. The water samples were transported to the laboratory, and the bacteria were collected into 5 PTFE filter membranes with a pore size of 0.22 μm by air pump filtration in one day. The filter membranes were stored at −80 °C until DNA extraction. Other portions of the samples were collected into 500 mL plastic bottles and 40 mL amber glass bottles for inorganic and organic analyses, respectively.
The sampling wells were divided into five groups by the groundwater flow direction and the location of the contamination source. Since the flow direction varied a little with time, the concentrations of contaminants were also considered during the grouping. The upstream-source group included samples PM7 and OTAW4, the source group included MW7 and PM4, the downstream-source group included MW3 and MW17, the downstream-plume group included samples MW6 and MW10, and the side-plume group included samples MW4, MW5, and MW13.

2.2. Chemical Analyses

Considering that monocyclic aromatics are related to their toxicity and relatively high solubility [23], and the chemical oxygen demand (COD) is always used to quantify the amount of organics in petroleum [24], the concentrations of monocyclic aromatics and COD were monitored as the contamination indexes during the study.
The concentrations of monocyclic aromatics, such as toluene, ethylbenzene, m-xylene, p-xylene, and o-xylene, were determined as outlined in US EPA Method 8260 [25]. Concentrations of other variables, namely chemical oxygen demand (COD), total dissolved solids (TDS), pH, Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, NO3−, SO42−, HCO3−, Cl−, Fe2+, Mn2+, and CO2, in the groundwater were measured following the Standard Methods [26].

2.3. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, Library Construction and Sequencing

DNA were extracted from each sample using an EZNA™ Soil DNA Kit (OMEGA bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The V4–V5 region of bacterial 16S-rRNA genes was amplified using the universal primers 515F (GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA) and 926R (CCGTCAATTCMTTTRAGTTT) [27]. The PCR analysis was carried out in the following order: Initial denaturation at 98 °C for 2 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 98 °C for 15 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. Libraries were sequenced by a sequencing platform (HiSeq 2500) at Personalbio-Shanghai, Shanghai, China.

2.4. Bioinformatics Analysis

Raw sequences were filtered and then high-quality reads were assigned to operational taxonomic units (OTUs) [28]. Then the OTUs were subsampled to the minimum reads. Various alpha-diversity indexes (observed species [Sobs], the Chao estimate, abundance-based coverage estimator [ACE], the Shannon and Simpson diversity indexes) were used to evaluate the species information.
To determine the influence of the petroleum on the bacteria, samples were divided into three groups according to the degree of COD contamination. The samples with COD concentrations less than 10 mg/L, between 10 mg/L and 100 mg/L, and greater than 100 mg/L were classified as having low contamination, medium contamination, and high contamination, respectively. The authors then used Venn diagrams to examine the bacterial communities in the groups by the contamination level and by the groundwater flow areas.
The authors carried out principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of the microbial communities using unweighted unifrac with full trees at the genus level. The authors used redundancy analysis (RDA) to determine which environmental variables were associated with changes in the structures of the bacterial community. The environmental variables were divided into two groups. One group contained the contaminant compounds, organic index (COD), and the electron acceptors, such as DO, NO3−, SO42− and HCO3−, or metabolic by-products, Mn2+ and Fe2+, involved in microbial degradation. The other group contained the pH, TDS, and the major ions in groundwater, such as Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, NO3−, SO42−, HCO3−, and Cl−.
The bioinformatics analyses were carried out in the cloud platform of majorbio (http://www.i-sanger.com) according to the programs as the reference mentioned [29].

3. Results

3.1. The Distribution of Electron Acceptors-Donors and Other Chemical Parameters

The concentrations of electron acceptors and donors and other chemical parameters in the groundwater are shown in Table 1. The concentrations of the contaminants, i.e., electron donors and COD, show that the groundwater was seriously contaminated by petroleum and that the contamination varied in the different areas. The contamination was highest in the source area and decreased (in order) in the downstream-source, downstream-plume, upstream-source, and side-plume areas. Apart from the side-plume wells, the DO and NO3− concentrations were less than 2 mg/L and 12 mg/L, respectively. The concentrations of HCO3−, K+, Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl−, TDS, and CO2 were lower in the upstream-source wells.

3.2. Alpha-Diversity Indexes

Alpha-diversity indexes of the bacterial communities in the 11 samples are shown in Table 2. The good coverage index (>0.995) showed that the obtained reads in the study were representative. The Sobs, Shannon, ACE, and Chao indexes were higher, while the Simpson index was lower, in the samples from the side-plume than in the other samples.

3.3. Community Composition

The compositions of the bacterial communities in the 11 samples at the genus level are shown in Figure 2.
Sequences representing Dechloromonas were the most abundant bacterium and accounted for 23% of all bacterial sequences in MW7. Dechloromonas was also detected and accounted for between 3% and 9% of all the bacteria, in PM4 and in the samples collected from the downstream-source and downstream-plume areas.
Sequences representing Acidovorax were most the abundant, and accounted for 43% of all bacteria, in PW4. They were also present at abundances greater than 10% in MW7, and in samples from the downstream-source (MW17 and MW3) and downstream-plume (MW6) areas. These sequences were also present at lower abundances in other samples.
Sequences representing Hydrogenophaga were most the abundant in OTAW4, MW13, MW17, and MW3, where they accounted for 33%, 45%, 38%, and 37%, respectively. They were also present at abundances of between 3% and 20% in all other samples, except those from the contamination source area (samples MW7 and PM4).
Sequences representing Comamonas, present in all samples, were the most abundant in samples PM7 and MW4, where they accounted for 23% and 19% of all bacteria, respectively. They were most abundant in the upstream source area, and then decreased (in rank order) in the side-plume, downstream-source, downstream-plume, and were least abundant in the contaminant source areas.
Sequences representing Rhodoferax were the most abundant in MW5, MW6, and MW10, where it accounted for 23%, 18%, and 23% of total bacteria, respectively. Except for sample PM4, Rhodoferax accounted for more than 10% of all bacteria in the samples.
Sequences representing other bacteria were present at higher abundances (>5%) in certain samples. Pseudomonas was in all the samples, but only had abundances of more than 10% in samples from the source area (MW7 and PM4) and in MW10, for example. Treponema was detected in all samples and, apart from MW7 and MW10 where it had abundances of 7% and 10%, respectively, its abundances were less than 5%. Present in all samples, Novosphingobium was more abundant in the upstream-source area samples (OTAW4 (12%) and PM7 (8%)) than in other areas, where its abundances were less than 5%. Pseudoxanthomonas was present in samples PM4 and MW7 from the source area at abundances of 6% and 9%, respectively, and was either present at abundances of less than 1% in, or was absent from, the plume area. Zavarzinia was most abundant in MW4 (12%) and MW6 (8%) and was present in other samples at abundances of less than 1%. Sulfuritalea was detected in all samples. Apart from MW5, where its abundance was 13%, its abundances were less than 2%. Sulfuricurvum had abundances of 7% in MW5 and MW10, and of about 1% in MW3 and MW6. Desulfosporosinus was only present in MW6 and MW10 at abundances of 2% and 8%, respectively. Nitrospira was found in MW5 and MW4 only at abundances of 5% and 1%, respectively. Norank_p__Omnitrophica was only found in MW5 at an abundance of 5%.

3.4. Relationships between Bacterial Communities among Samples

Venn diagrams showed the number of species that were unique to, or shared between, the different groups. The species are presented according to the different degrees of petroleum contamination in Figure 3a. The 3 contamination classes shared 214 species, and the group with low contamination had 191 unique species. This figure demonstrates the reduced bacterial diversity in petroleum -contaminated wells. The species found in the different parts of the groundwater flow field are shown in Figure 3b. The different parts shared 98 species, and the groundwater from the side-plume area had the greatest number of unique species.
The results of the PCoA are shown in Figure 4. The samples from the same groundwater flow area were grouped together. The side-plume group was grouped to the left of the graph along the first principal component (PC1), while the other samples were grouped to the right of the graph. The samples from the upstream-source, downstream-plume, downstream-source, and source areas were grouped along the second principal component (PC2).
The RDA plot (Figure 5) indicated that samples PM4 and MW7 from the contamination source area and sample MW6 from the downstream-plume were associated with high concentrations of COD, toluene, xylene, and ethylbenzene. Samples MW5 and MW10 were associated with high SO42− and DO, samples MW4 and PM7 were associated with high NO3− and DO, sample MW13 was associated with low Mn2+, and samples MW3 and MW17 were associated with high Fe2+ and low SO42−. The upstream-source samples were associated with high pH values.
Most of the genera were clustering in the center of the plot, which indicates that these bacteria were present in all samples at similar abundances. The relative abundance of Acidovorax increased as the COD increased. Pseudoxanthomonas was positively correlated with toluene and xylene, and Novosphingobium and Comamonas were negatively correlated with toluene and xylene. Dechloromonas and Pseudomonas were positively correlated with ethylbenzene. Hydrogenophaga was negatively correlated with bivalent manganese (Mn2+). Rhodoferax was negatively correlated with Fe2+ and positively correlated with DO.
The index of the organic content, COD, was positively correlated with various contaminants (toluene, xylene, and ethylbenzene) and HCO3−, Fe2+, and Mn2+, and was negatively correlated with SO42−, DO, and NO3−. The pH was negatively correlated with TDS, Mg2+, Ca2+, and Cl−.

4. Discussion

4.1. Variations in Bacterial Communities with Electron Donor Concentrations

Analysis of the community diversity of all the groundwater samples showed that the bacterial communities of samples within the same groundwater flow area were similar. Most of the bacteria that were present at abundances of more than 5% in this contaminated aquifer were related to the degradation of hydrocarbons, especially aromatic hydrocarbons. The bacterial communities varied in different areas.
Hydrogenophaga was not present in the source zone (MW7 and PM4). Hydrogenophaga can metabolize various organic compounds, such as polycyclic aromatics and toluic acid, but not toluene and xylene [30]. Researches showed that high concentrations of toluene and xylene may have negatively impact it [31], Hydrogenophaga tends be more abundant where toluene and xylene concentrations are low and COD concentrations are high. Comamonas can also degrade polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [32], but its abundances were lowest in the source area (samples MW7 and PM4). This bacterium might be harmed by high concentrations of hydrocarbons. While Rhodoferax can degrade benzene [33], it was least abundant in PM4 where the toluene contamination was greatest, which might indicate that this bacterium is sensitive to toluene. Rhodoferax was correlated with increases in DO in the RDA plot, which suggests that its growth may also be limited by oxygen. Acidovorax, Pseudomonas, Dechloromonas, and Pseudoxanthomonas, also capable of degrading hydrocarbons, were abundant in the highly contaminated groundwater in the source zone. Acidovorax can use various PAHs [34]. The species of Pseudomonas in the study site was Pseudomonas mendocina, which can degrade toluene [35]. The Dechloromonas in the aquifer shared a 99% sequence similarity with Dechloromonas hortensis and Dechloromonas denitrificans, which can use ClO4−, ClO3−, NO3−, and O2 as electron acceptors to oxidize organic compounds, such as aromatic hydrocarbons [36,37]. Pseudoxanthomonas can produce biosurfactants and can be used to degrade BTEX [38,39]. These four bacteria, Acidovorax, Pseudomonas, Dechloromonas and Pseudoxanthomonas, may be more tolerant to petroleum than the other bacteria, as shown in the RDA analysis. Novosphingobium can also degrade aromatic hydrocarbons [40,41] and was more abundant in upstream-source zone samples (OTAW4 and PM7) than in the other areas. Treponema, previously discovered in hydrocarbon-contaminated sediments, can degrade hydrocarbons [8,42] and was present at relatively high abundances in MW7 and MW10. Zavarzinia, which can degrade benzene in aerobic conditions [43], was mainly found in samples MW4 and MW6 from the plume area, where the contents of dissolved oxygen were relatively high. Apart from sample MW5 from the side-plume, these 10 hydrocarbon degrading bacteria mentioned above accounted for more than 65% of all bacteria in all the samples.
The high abundance of degradation bacteria in the groundwater samples, combined with electron acceptors-donors, indicates that natural attenuation was occurring at this site. Venn diagrams (Figure 3) and the α-diversity indexes (Table 2) showed that a considerable number of species were sensitive to petroleum organics. The values of the Sobs, Chao, ACE, and Shannon indexes were higher, while the Simpson index was lower, in the samples from the side-plume than in the other samples. The Sobs, Chao, and ACE indexes are used to reflect the richness of species, and the Shannon and Simpson indexes reflect both the richness and the evenness of the species in samples [44]. The Shannon index has been reported to be more sensitive to changes in richness, while the Simpson index is more sensitive to the evenness [45]. Therefore, it can be said that, consistent with other studies [11,46], contamination can result in a decline of diversity and increase of abundances of dominant microorganisms. The RDA plots indicated that, of all the environmental factors, the toluene, xylene, and COD had the most effect on the bacterial communities.

4.2. The Influence of Electron Acceptors on Bacterial Communities

The electron acceptors were being consumed as the petroleum was being degraded. The electron acceptors were consumed in a certain order, with O2 consumed first, followed by NO3−, Mn4+, Fe3+, SO42−, and HCO3−, during aerobic reaction, denitrification, Mn4+ reduction, Fe3+ reduction, SO42− reduction, and methane production, respectively [16].
Samples MW3 and MW17 were associated with high Fe2+ and low SO42−, which indicated that the electron acceptors Fe3+ and SO42− had been consumed, these two samples probably were in the methanogenesis stage. These two samples had the highest abundances of Hydrogenophaga, which is always closely related with methanogenic archaea [47,48]. Other studies have suggested that Hydrogenophaga might have catalyzed hydrogen production or perhaps was an oxygen scavenger, and that it created the strictly anoxic conditions essential for the methanogenic archaea [49]. Hydrogenophaga can produce and use hydrogen, one of the substrate of methanogenesis, as its energy source, which suggests that there might be cooperative relationships between Hydrogenophaga and methanogenic archaea. Sample PM4 was associated with high Fe2+ and Mn2+, so either Fe3+, Mn4+, and SO42− reduction or methanogenesis might have dominated. However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, the two most abundant bacteria in the sample, Acidovorax and Pseudomonas, cannot use Fe3+, Mn4+, or SO42− as their electron acceptors [50,51], which suggests that methanogenesis might have also dominated in this area. Other studies have shown that Acidovorax, a facultative aerobic microorganism that can use carboxylic acids as a carbon source, was closely associated with methanogenic archaea [49]. The sequences that represent syntrophic bacterial species, Syntrophus, Syntrophomonas, Syntrophobacter and Pelotomaculum, which usually provide hydrogen and carbon dioxide to methanogens, were found in these samples (See OTU table in Supplementary Materials).
Samples MW7 and MW6 were associated with high Mn2+ and SO42−, which suggests that these samples were in the Fe3+ reduction phase and had the potential to reduce the SO42−. Dechloromonas, Rhodoferax, and Pseudomonas mendocina were the most abundant bacteria in these two samples. Dechloromonas often use NO3− and O2 as electron acceptors, and are not known to grow in Fe3+ or SO42− reducing conditions, or through syntrophic interactions with methanogenic bacteria [52]. Rhodoferax can use Fe3+, NO3−, and O2, but not SO42− as electron acceptors [53]. Pseudomonas mendocina tested positive for oxidase and NO3− reduction (assimilatory), but negative for dissimilatory NO3−, Fe3+, and SO42− reduction [54]. While these bacteria cannot use SO42− as an electron acceptor, Treponema [55] and Desulfosporosinus [56], found in samples in MW6 and MW7, can reduce SO42−.
Samples MW5, MW10, and MW4 were associated with high SO42−, DO, and NO3−, which indicated that these samples were in the aerobic or denitrification phase. Rhodoferax, as shown in the RDA plot, was related with these samples. The groundwater samples contained some special bacteria. Sulfuritalea, was detected in all samples at abundances less than 2%, apart from MW5, which had a Sulfuritalea content of 13%. This bacterium was isolated from the water of a freshwater lake. It can oxidize thiosulfate, elemental sulfur, and hydrogen as sole energy sources for autotrophic growth and can use NO3− as an electron acceptor [57]. Sulfuricurvum, which had relatively high abundances in MW5 and MW10, is a facultatively anaerobic, chemolithoautotrophic, sulfur-oxidizing bacterium [58]. Desulfosporosinus, was also abundant in MW10, which suggests that there was strong SO42− reduction in MW10. Nitrospira, was only present in MW5 (5%) and MW4 (<1%). It is a ubiquitous bacterium that can oxidize the NO2− into NO3−, which is an aerobic process [59]. The relatively high oxygen contents in the two samples meant that there was enough oxygen for this bacterium to survive. Norank_p__Omnitrophica only appeared in MW5. More than 10 OTUs corresponded to this bacterium. The function of this bacterium is not well defined; it was previously identified in an anammox community [60] and might be related to Magnetotactic bacteria [61].
Samples PM7 and OTA4 were associated with high NO3− and low Mn2+, which suggests that these samples were in the denitrification phases. The positions of the bacteria Comamonas, and Novosphingobium on the RDA plot, confirm this view. Comamonas can reduce Fe3+, Mn4+, and NO3− [62,63], but not SO42−, and Novosphingobium can reduce NO3− [40]. The HCO3− contents in PM7 and OTA4 were lower and the pH values were higher than in the other samples. When the pH is higher, CaCO3 and MgCO3 precipitate more readily [64], resulting in lower TDS, Mg2+, Ca2+ and HCO3− concentrations in the water.
Sample MW13 was associated with low Mn2+ and closely related with Hydrogenophaga, which can oxidize Mn2+ [65] also. During this process, O2 and NO3− can be used as electron acceptors [48,66]. This suggests that the O2 and NO3− were adequate and MW13 was in the aerobic reaction or denitrification stage.

5. Conclusions

The bacterial community diversity varied within different groundwater flow fields. Suspected hydrocarbon degrading bacteria accounted for a considerable percentage of these bacterial communities, which indicates that petroleum biodegradation potential was great. The different bacterial communities corresponded to different redox reaction stages in different locations. Generally, the side-plume and upstream-source samples were in the aerobic or denitrification stages, and the corresponding bacteria were Rhodoferax, Novosphingobium, Hydrogenophaga, and Comamonas. Samples from the source and the downstream-source areas were related to Fe3+, Mn4+, and SO42− reduction and likely methanogenesis, and the corresponding bacteria were Rhodoferax, Treponema, Desulfosporosinus, Hydrogenophaga and Acidovorax. It was proposed that spatial patterns of bacterial communities were determined by groundwater flow for its influence on the distribution of electron donors and acceptors in this petroleum-contaminated aquifer.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials: The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/7/842/s1. Table S1: OTU table.

Author Contributions

M.Z. and Z.H. Conceived and designed the experiments; M.Z., Z.H., Z.N., P.C., C.G. and P.W. collected the samples and performed the experiments; Z.N. and M.Z. analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

Funding

This research was funded by [National Natural Science Foundation of China] grant number [41402233, 41602261], [Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province] grant number [D2016504021] and [Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, CAGS Research Fund] grant numbers [SK201702, SK201604, YYWF201519, SK201614].

Acknowledgments

We thank Deborah Ballantine, PhD, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Editing China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Shahi, A.; Ince, B.; Aydin, S.; Ince, O. Assessment of the horizontal transfer of functional genes as a suitable approach for evaluation of the bioremediation potential of petroleum-contaminated sites: A mini-review. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 4341–4348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. López, E.; Schuhmacher, M.; Domingo, J.L. Human health risks of petroleum-contaminated groundwater. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2008, 15, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, S.; Su, X.; Lin, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Experimental study on the multi-media prb reactor for the remediation of petroleum-contaminated groundwater. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015, 73, 5611–5618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hunkeler, D.; Höhener, P.; Bernasconi, S.; Zeyer, J. Engineered in situ bioremediation of a petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer: Assessment of mineralization based on alkalinity, inorganic carbon and stable carbon isotope balances. J. Contam. Hydrol. 1999, 37, 201–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hibbing, M.E.; Fuqua, C.; Parsek, M.R.; Peterson, S.B. Bacterial competition: Surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 8, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Faust, K.; Sathirapongsasuti, J.F.; Izard, J.; Segata, N.; Gevers, D.; Raes, J.; Huttenhower, C. Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2012, 8, e1002606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  7. Schiegg, H.-O. Field infiltration as a method for the disposal of oil-in-water emulsions from the restoration of oil-polluted aquifers. Water Res. 1980, 14, 1011–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tischer, K.; Kleinsteuber, S.; Schleinitz, K.M.; Fetzer, I.; Spott, O.; Stange, F.; Lohse, U.; Franz, J.; Neumann, F.; Gerling, S.; et al. Microbial communities along biogeochemical gradients in a hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 2603–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Saul, D.J.; Aislabie, J.M.; Brown, C.E.; Harris, L.; Foght, J.M. Hydrocarbon contamination changes the bacterial diversity of soil from around scott base, antarctica. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2005, 53, 141–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Abed, R.M.M.; Al-Kindi, S.; Al-Kharusi, S. Diversity of bacterial communities along a petroleum contamination gradient in desert soils. Microb. Ecol. 2015, 69, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Peng, M.; Zi, X.; Wang, Q. Bacterial community diversity of oil-contaminated soils assessed by high throughput sequencing of 16s rRNA genes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 12002–12015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lu, L.; Huggins, T.; Jin, S.; Zuo, Y.; Ren, Z.J. Microbial metabolism and community structure in response to bioelectrochemically enhanced remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 4021–4029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fahy, A.; Lethbridge, G.; Earle, R.; Ball, A.S.; Timmis, K.N.; McGenity, T.J. Effects of long-term benzene pollution on bacterial diversity and community structure in groundwater. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 7, 1192–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zheng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Su, X.; Cui, X. Responses of hydrochemical parameters, community structures, and microbial activities to the natural biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in a groundwater–soil environment. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, A.-X.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Dong, T.-Z.; Lin, X.-Y.; Su, X.-S. Response of the microbial community to seasonal groundwater level fluctuations in petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated groundwater. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 10094–10106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lueders, T. The ecology of anaerobic degraders of btex hydrocarbons in aquifers. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2017, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yergeau, E.; Sanschagrin, S.; Maynard, C.; St-Arnaud, M.; Greer, C.W. Microbial expression profiles in the rhizosphere of willows depend on soil contamination. ISME J. 2013, 8, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Main, C.E.; Ruhl, H.A.; Jones, D.O.B.; Yool, A.; Thornton, B.; Mayor, D.J. Hydrocarbon contamination affects deep-sea benthic oxygen uptake and microbial community composition. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2015, 100, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  19. Dorer, C.; Vogt, C.; Neu, T.R.; Stryganyuk, G.; Richnow, H. Characterization of toluene and ethylbenzene biodegradation under nitrate-, iron(III)- and manganese(IV)-reducing conditions by compound-specific isotope analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 211, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Acosta-González, A.; Marqués, S. Bacterial diversity in oil-polluted marine coastal sediments. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016, 38, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Gieg, L.M.; Fowler, S.J.; Berdugo-Clavijo, C. Syntrophic biodegradation of hydrocarbon contaminants. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 27, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Meckenstock, R.U.; Elsner, M.; Griebler, C.; Lueders, T.; Stumpp, C.; Aamand, J.; Agathos, S.N.; Albrechtsen, H.-J.; Bastiaens, L.; Bjerg, P.L.; et al. Biodegradation: Updating the concepts of control for microbial cleanup in contaminated aquifers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 7073–7081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  23. Röling, W.F.M.; van Breukelen, B.M.; Braster, M.; Lin, B.; van Verseveld, H.W. Relationships between microbial community structure and hydrochemistry in a landfill leachate-polluted aquifer. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 4619–4629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wan, J.; Gu, J.; Zhao, Q.; Liu, Y. Cod capture: A feasible option towards energy self-sufficient domestic wastewater treatment. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.E.P). Method 8260b Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (gc/ms); United States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1996.
  26. Standard, A. Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewate; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ye, J.; Song, Z.; Wang, L.; Zhu, J. Metagenomic analysis of microbiota structure evolution in phytoremediation of a swine lagoon wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 219, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, W.; Li, C.; Li, F.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Liu, T.; Nian, F.; Yue, X.; Li, F.; Pan, X.; et al. Effects of early feeding on the host rumen transcriptome and bacterial diversity in lambs. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  29. Xu, S.; Yao, J.; Ainiwaer, M.; Hong, Y.; Zhang, Y. Analysis of bacterial community structure of activated sludge from wastewater treatment plants in winter. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Song, H.; Qiu, S.; Zhang, J.; Xia, C. Study on hydrogenophaga palleronii LHJ38—A naphthalene-degrading strain with high activity. Environ. Prot. Chem. Ind. 2006, 26, 87–90. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yang, Q.; Cai, S.; Dong, S.; Chen, L.; Chen, J.; Cai, T. Biodegradation of 3-methyldiphenylether (MDE) by hydrogenophaga atypical strain QY7-2 and cloning of the methy-oxidation gene mdeabcd. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Goyal, A.K.; Zylstra, G.J. Molecular cloning of novel genes for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation from Comamonas testosteroni GZ39. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Aburto, A.; Peimbert, M. Degradation of a benzene–toluene mixture by hydrocarbon-adapted bacterial communities. Ann. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 553–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Singleton, D.R.; Guzmán Ramirez, L.; Aitken, M.D. Characterization of a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation gene cluster in a phenanthrene-degrading acidovorax strain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 2613–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yen, K.M.; Karl, M.R.; Blatt, L.M.; Simon, M.J.; Winter, R.B.; Fausset, P.R.; Lu, H.S.; Harcourt, A.A.; Chen, K.K. Cloning and characterization of a pseudomonas mendocina KR1 gene cluster encoding toluene-4-monooxygenase. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 5315–5327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liebensteiner, M.G.; Oosterkamp, M.J.; Stams, A.J.M. Microbial respiration with chlorine oxyanions: Diversity and physiological and biochemical properties of chlorate- and perchlorate-reducing microorganisms. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2016, 1365, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Mehboob, F.; Weelink, S.; Saia, F.T.; Junca, H.; Stams, A.J.M.; Schraa, G. Microbial degradation of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons with (per)chlorate as electron acceptor. In Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology; Timmis, K.N., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 935–945. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nayak, A.S.; Vijaykumar, M.H.; Karegoudar, T.B. Characterization of biosurfactant produced by Pseudoxanthomonas sp. PNK-04 and its application in bioremediation. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2009, 63, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, J.M.; Le, N.T.; Chung, B.S.; Park, J.H.; Bae, J.-W.; Madsen, E.L.; Jeon, C.O. Influence of soil components on the biodegradation of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and o-, m-, and p-xylenes by the newly isolated bacterium pseudoxanthomonas spadix BD-a59. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 7313–7320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sohn, J.H.; Kwon, K.K.; Kang, J.-H.; Jung, H.-B.; Kim, S.-J. Novosphingobium pentaromativorans sp. Nov., a high-molecular-mass polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium isolated from estuarine sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 1483–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Liu, Z.-P.; Wang, B.-J.; Liu, Y.-H.; Liu, S.-J. Novosphingobium taihuense sp. Nov., a novel aromatic-compound-degrading bacterium isolated from taihu lake, china. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1229–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Callaghan, A.V.; Davidova, I.A.; Savage-Ashlock, K.; Parisi, V.A.; Gieg, L.M.; Suflita, J.M.; Kukor, J.J.; Wawrik, B. Diversity of benzyl- and alkylsuccinate synthase genes in hydrocarbon-impacted environments and enrichment cultures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 7287–7294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Rochman, F.F.; Sheremet, A.; Tamas, I.; Saidi-Mehrabad, A.; Kim, J.-J.; Dong, X.; Sensen, C.W.; Gieg, L.M.; Dunfield, P.F. Benzene and naphthalene degrading bacterial communities in an oil sands tailings pond. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Feng, Y.; Li, X.; Song, T.; Yu, Y.; Qi, J. Stimulation effect of electric current density (ECD) on microbial community of a three dimensional particle electrode coupled with biological aerated filter reactor (TDE-BAF). Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 243, 667–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Qing, X.U.; Zhang, F.; Zhong-Qi, X.U.; Jia, Y.L.; You, J.M. Some characteristics of simpson index and the shannon-wiener index and their dilution effect. Pratacult. Sci. 2011, 28, 527–531. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sutton, N.B.; Maphosa, F.; Morillo, J.A.; Abu Al-Soud, W.; Langenhoff, A.A.M.; Grotenhuis, T.; Rijnaarts, H.H.M.; Smidt, H. Impact of long-term diesel contamination on soil microbial community structure. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 619–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Guo, H.; Liu, R.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Yun, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Pan, J. Pyrosequencing reveals the dominance of methylotrophic methanogenesis in a coal bed methane reservoir associated with eastern ordos basin in china. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2012, 93, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jones, E.J.P.; Voytek, M.A.; Corum, M.D.; Orem, W.H. Stimulation of methane generation from nonproductive coal by addition of nutrients or a microbial consortium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 7013–7022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Van Eerten-Jansen, M.C.A.A.; Veldhoen, A.B.; Plugge, C.M.; Stams, A.J.M.; Buisman, C.J.N.; Ter Heijne, A. Microbial community analysis of a methane-producing biocathode in a bioelectrochemical system. Archaea 2013, 2013, 481784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hersman, L.E.; Huang, A.; Maurice, P.A.; Forsythe, J.H. Siderophore production and iron reduction by pseudomonas mendocina in response to iron deprivation. Geomicrobiol. J. 2000, 17, 261–273. [Google Scholar]
  51. Pantke, C.; Obst, M.; Benzerara, K.; Morin, G.; Ona-Nguema, G.; Dippon, U.; Kappler, A. Green rust formation during fe(ii) oxidation by the nitrate-reducing Acidovorax sp. Strain bofen1. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 1439–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Chakraborty, R.; Coates, J.D. Hydroxylation and carboxylation—Two crucial steps of anaerobic benzene degradation by dechloromonas strain rcb. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 5427–5432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Finneran, K.T.; Johnsen, C.V.; Lovley, D.R. Rhodoferax ferrireducens sp. Nov., a psychrotolerant, facultatively anaerobic bacterium that oxidizes acetate with the reduction of fe(iii). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2003, 53, 669–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Patricia, A.M.; Vierkorn, M.A.; Hersman, L.E.; Fulghum, J.E.; Ferryman, A. Enhancement of kaolinite dissolution by an aerobic pseudomonas mendocina bacterium. Geomicrobiol. J. 2001, 18, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jovanović, T.; Ascenso, C.; Hazlett, K.R.O.; Sikkink, R.; Krebs, C.; Litwiller, R.; Benson, L.M.; Moura, I.; Moura, J.J.G.; Radolf, J.D.; et al. Neelaredoxin, an iron-binding protein from the syphilis spirochete, treponema pallidum, is a superoxide reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 28439–28448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ramamoorthy, S.; Sass, H.; Langner, H.; Schumann, P.; Kroppenstedt, R.M.; Spring, S.; Overmann, J.; Rosenzweig, R.F. Desulfosporosinus lacus sp. Nov., a sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from pristine freshwater lake sediments. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 2729–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kojima, H.; Fukui, M. Sulfuritalea hydrogenivorans gen. Nov., sp. Nov., a facultative autotroph isolated from a freshwater lake. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 1651–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kodama, Y.; Watanabe, K. Sulfuricurvum kujiense gen. Nov., sp. Nov., a facultatively anaerobic, chemolithoautotrophic, sulfur-oxidizing bacterium isolated from an underground crude-oil storage cavity. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 2297–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Koch, H.; Lücker, S.; Albertsen, M.; Kitzinger, K.; Herbold, C.; Spieck, E.; Nielsen, P.H.; Wagner, M.; Daims, H. Expanded metabolic versatility of ubiquitous nitrite-oxidizing bacteria from the genus nitrospira. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 11371–11376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ludington, W.B.; Seher, T.D.; Applegate, O.; Li, X.; Kliegman, J.I.; Langelier, C.; Atwill, E.R.; Harter, T.; Derisi, J.L. Assessing biosynthetic potential of agricultural groundwater through metagenomic sequencing: A diverse anammox community dominates nitrate-rich groundwater. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ji, B.; Zhang, S.D.; Zhang, W.J.; Rouy, Z.; Alberto, F.; Santini, C.L.; Mangenot, S.; Gagnot, S.; Philippe, N.; Pradel, N. The chimeric nature of the genomes of marine magnetotactic coccoid-ovoid bacteria defines a novel group of proteobacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 1103–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wu, C.-Y.; Zhuang, L.; Zhou, S.-G.; Li, F.-B.; Li, X.-M. Fe(III)-enhanced anaerobic transformation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by an iron-reducing bacterium Comamonas koreensis Cy01. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2009, 71, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Patureau, D.; Bernet, N.; Moletta, R. Study of the denitrifying enzymatic system of Comamonas sp. Strain SGLY2 under various aeration conditions with a particular view on nitrate and nitrite reductases. Curr. Microbiol. 1996, 32, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kai, X.X.; Fang, M.C. A experimental study of influence of ph on calcium carbonate crystallization fouling. Petro-Chem. Equip. 2004, 33, 11–14. [Google Scholar]
  65. Marcus, D.N.; Pinto, A.; Anantharaman, K.; Ruberg, S.A.; Kramer, E.L.; Raskin, L.; Dick, G.J. Diverse manganese(II)-oxidizing bacteria are prevalent in drinking water systems. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2017, 9, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Mechichi, T.; Stackebrandt, E.; Fuchs, G. Alicycliphilus denitrificans gen. Nov., sp. Nov., a cyclohexanol-degrading, nitrate-reducing β-proteobacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2003, 53, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Water 10 00842 g001 550
Figure 1. Diagram showing the petroleum-contaminated area, the monitoring wells, and the groundwater flow direction.
Figure 1. Diagram showing the petroleum-contaminated area, the monitoring wells, and the groundwater flow direction.
Water 10 00842 g001
Water 10 00842 g002 550
Figure 2. Bar chart of community abundances (greater than 5%) at the genus level.
Figure 2. Bar chart of community abundances (greater than 5%) at the genus level.
Water 10 00842 g002
Water 10 00842 g003 550
Figure 3. Venn diagrams showing the bacteria by (a) the degree of contamination and (b) locations.
Figure 3. Venn diagrams showing the bacteria by (a) the degree of contamination and (b) locations.
Water 10 00842 g003
Water 10 00842 g004 550
Figure 4. The PCoA plot of samples at the genus level.
Figure 4. The PCoA plot of samples at the genus level.
Water 10 00842 g004
Water 10 00842 g005 550
Figure 5. Redundancy analysis (RDA) of the relationship between the groundwater parameters and the relative abundance of the bacterial genus of the collected samples. The contamination indexes and the electron acceptors are mainly shown in (a); while the major ions, TDS, and pH are mainly shown in (b).
Figure 5. Redundancy analysis (RDA) of the relationship between the groundwater parameters and the relative abundance of the bacterial genus of the collected samples. The contamination indexes and the electron acceptors are mainly shown in (a); while the major ions, TDS, and pH are mainly shown in (b).
Water 10 00842 g005
Table
Table 1. Hydrochemical parameters and the contaminant concentrations.
Table 1. Hydrochemical parameters and the contaminant concentrations.
LocationSide-PlumeUpstream-SourceSourceDownstream-SourceDownstream-Plume
WellMW5MW4MW13PM7OTAW4MW7PM4MW3MW17MW6MW10
Electron donors (μg·L−1)toluene974631510811,21120,61072311,6807689287
ethylbenzene11.16.90.151.7204316583832.92078668971.5
m(p)-xylene22.214.811.2458.32530013678579.171636.51115759.8
o-xylene22.222.130.6656.678.330013680320.21636.522589.45
Electron acceptors (mg·L−1)DO2.382.191.950.870.761.290.841.30.851.971.67
NO3−16.7768.964.61.78<0.201.751.761.761.7511.57.73
SO42−107.2277.639.6738.1569.2283.7966.721.5416.68163.398.7
HCO3−791.6780.1889.1316.7494.5648.5715.5712.5831.8822.1767.3
metabolic by-products (mg·L−1)Fe2+0.0490.0180.3720.1270.0610.4890.8060.5874.6432.3051.586
Mn2+6.480.6251.9530.7550.7812.3562.51.4732.5893.5182.862
Other ion (mg·L−1)K+3.143.352.491.581.912.21.721.432.172.571.01
Na+179.3135.9149.467.96135.8133.6137.8145.6165.4124.1152.4
Ca2+282.9255.9141.261.5699.63151.4162.3108.9139.4209.4172.8
Mg2+121.493.7461.8121.5942.2462.4459.9641.5861.3281.8760.19
Cl−583.6214.6134.561.32162.7198.6195.1141.8191.6182.9193.4
TDS16751439975.3412.3758.8958.1983.1818.9994.311771064
COD (mg·L−1)4.371.654.546.1956.23162.4268.756.23337.440.6331.24
pH6.947.267.227.597.667.157.027.226.947.157.28
Table
Table 2. Alpha-diversity indexes.
Table 2. Alpha-diversity indexes.
LocationSampleDiversity Indexes
SobsShannonSimpsonAceChaoCoverage
Side-plumeMW53833.730.07428.3443.860.995
MW43243.590.08356.17358.890.996
MW132492.820.12317.9314.270.995
Upstream-sourcePM72112.890.12260.23262.210.996
OTAW41912.760.15240.13226.250.997
SourceMW71972.790.12246.43238.440.996
PM41862.70.2341.12294.480.995
Downstream-sourceMW31902.610.17287.61263.750.995
MW171602.180.2204.92196.960.997
Downstream-plumeMW62153.440.07266.41291.560.996
MW102043.050.09256.63255.110.996

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ning, Z.; Zhang, M.; He, Z.; Cai, P.; Guo, C.; Wang, P. Spatial Pattern of Bacterial Community Diversity Formed in Different Groundwater Field Corresponding to Electron Donors and Acceptors Distributions at a Petroleum-Contaminated Site. Water 2018, 10, 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10070842

AMA Style

Ning Z, Zhang M, He Z, Cai P, Guo C, Wang P. Spatial Pattern of Bacterial Community Diversity Formed in Different Groundwater Field Corresponding to Electron Donors and Acceptors Distributions at a Petroleum-Contaminated Site. Water. 2018; 10(7):842. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10070842

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ning, Zhuo, Min Zhang, Ze He, Pingping Cai, Caijuan Guo, and Ping Wang. 2018. "Spatial Pattern of Bacterial Community Diversity Formed in Different Groundwater Field Corresponding to Electron Donors and Acceptors Distributions at a Petroleum-Contaminated Site" Water 10, no. 7: 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10070842

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop