Next Article in Journal
Case Study on Application of the Step with Non-Uniform Heights at the Bottom Using a Numerical and Experimental Model
Previous Article in Journal
Improved Building Treatment Approach for Urban Inundation Modeling: A Case Study in Wuhan, China
Article Menu
Issue 12 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Comparing Three Approaches to Estimating Optimum White Water Kayak Flows in Western Norway

1
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, IBM, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
2
Kayak Voss and Board Member of Ekstremsportveko, 5705 Voss, Norway
3
Norwegian Insitute for Water Research, Gaustadalléen 21, 0349 Oslo, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2018, 10(12), 1761; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121761
Received: 1 October 2018 / Revised: 19 November 2018 / Accepted: 21 November 2018 / Published: 30 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Water Resources Management and Governance)
  |  
PDF [7095 KB, uploaded 7 December 2018]
  |  

Abstract

Background: Modern water management strategies aim to assess the impact of water regulation alternatives on all relevant ecosystem services, including white water (WW) recreation. Therefore it is important to estimate the optimum kayak flow range for river reaches that are potentially relevant for WW kayaking. Methods: We used the grade V run of the Teigdalselva River as an example and compared the results of three different approaches: (i) a hydro-morphological analysis of kayak runs using public data sources; (ii) a citizen science method that is based on photos and videos of kayak-activities on the web; and, (iii) interviews with elite kayakers. Results: For the hydro-morphological analysis, we found that some optimal flow ranges for WW kayak could be estimated based on empirical regional regression as a function of the natural mean flow and the geomorphic run type. The interviewed kayakers suggested a wider range of optimal flows, in particular, higher maxima. The test of the citizen science approach provided flows that ranged in the middle of the estimates made by the two other approaches for prescribing optimum kayak flow ranges. Conclusions: We recommend a combination of different methods for water management studies that are related to flow requirements for white water kayak. Estimations based on the empirical regression functions should be always complemented by at least one other approach. View Full-Text
Keywords: citizen science; flow requirements; optimal kayak flows; hydro-morphology; Kråkefoss; run type; stream power; Teigdalselva River; Western Norway; white water kayak citizen science; flow requirements; optimal kayak flows; hydro-morphology; Kråkefoss; run type; stream power; Teigdalselva River; Western Norway; white water kayak
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zinke, P.; Sandvik, D.; Nesheim, I.; Seifert-Dähnn, I. Comparing Three Approaches to Estimating Optimum White Water Kayak Flows in Western Norway. Water 2018, 10, 1761.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top