Next Article in Journal
Future-Year Ozone Isopleths for South Coast, San Joaquin Valley, and Maryland
Next Article in Special Issue
Climate Change and Water-Related Infectious Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of El-Niño, Indian Ocean Dipole, and Madden-Julian Oscillation on Surface Air Temperature and Rainfall Anomalies over Southeast Asia in 2015
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Influence of the North Atlantic Oscillation Index on Emergency Ambulance Calls for Elevated Arterial Blood Pressure
Article Menu
Issue 9 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Atmosphere 2018, 9(9), 353; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9090353

Quantifying the Effect of Different Urban Planning Strategies on Heat Stress for Current and Future Climates in the Agglomeration of The Hague (The Netherlands)

1
Meteorology and Air Quality Section, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
2
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 201, 37371 GA De Bilt, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 29 May 2018 / Revised: 28 August 2018 / Accepted: 29 August 2018 / Published: 13 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health)
Full-Text   |   PDF [6891 KB, uploaded 14 September 2018]   |  

Abstract

In the Netherlands, there will be an urgent need for additional housing by the year 2040, which mainly has to be realized within the existing built environment rather than in the spatial extension of cities. In this data-driven study, we investigated the effects of different urban planning strategies on heat stress for the current climate and future climate scenarios (year 2050) for the urban agglomeration of The Hague. Heat stress is here expressed as the number of days exceeding minimum temperatures of 20 °C in a year. Thereto, we applied a diagnostic equation to determine the daily maximum urban heat island based on routine meteorological observations and straightforward urban morphological properties including the sky-view factor and the vegetation fraction. Moreover, we utilized the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute’s (KNMI) climate scenarios to transform present-day meteorological hourly time series into the future time series. The urban planning strategies differ in replacing low- and mid-rise buildings with high-rise buildings (which reduces the sky-view factor), and constructing buildings on green areas (which reduces the vegetation fraction). We found that, in most cases, the vegetation fraction is a more critical parameter than the sky-view factor to minimize the extra heat stress incurred when densifying the neighbourhood. This means that an urban planning strategy consisting of high-rise buildings and preserved green areas is often the best solution. Still, climate change will have a larger impact on heat stress for the year 2050 than the imposed urban densification. View Full-Text
Keywords: urban heat island; urban planning; heat resilience; climate scenarios urban heat island; urban planning; heat resilience; climate scenarios
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Koopmans, S.; Ronda, R.; Steeneveld, G.-J.; Holtslag, A.A.; Klein Tank, A.M. Quantifying the Effect of Different Urban Planning Strategies on Heat Stress for Current and Future Climates in the Agglomeration of The Hague (The Netherlands). Atmosphere 2018, 9, 353.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Atmosphere EISSN 2073-4433 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top