A System-Based Assessment of Methane Sources in an Eastern European Urban Environment (Cluj-Napoca, Romania)
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Instruments
- (i)
- The WestSystem package (West Systems SRL, Pontedera, Italy), containing a portable laser spectrometer (Gazomat, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France) based on Tunable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy (TDLAS), for CH4 detection, with a detection limit of 0.1 ppmv, precision and resolution of 0.1 ppmv, and dynamic range up to 100%, operating at 1 Hz sampling frequency [64].
- (ii)
- Mira Pico-AERIS (Hayward, CA, USA), based on Mid-Infrared Laser Absorption Spectroscopy (MILAS), for simultaneous detection of CH4 and C2H6. The system measures CH4 over a dynamic range of 10 ppbv to 10,000 ppmv with 1 ppbv precision, and C2H6 over 1 ppbv to 1000 ppmv with 0.5 ppbv precision, both at 1 Hz sampling frequency [65].
2.3. Instrument Calibration and Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC)
2.4. Point-Source Measurements
- Aquatic System (AQ): Dissolved methane (dCH4) sampling across the river, lakes, and ponds;
- Urban infrastructure (NG, SE, BSs): Natural gas end-use points, sewer manholes, and building basements, measured in two urban zones differing in land-use intensity;
- Traffic-based emissions (TEs): CH4 and C2H6 measurements from vehicle exhausts and near-road environments with varying traffic density.
2.4.1. The Aquatic System (AQ)
Sampling Design
- Tarnița Reservoir (~1,280,000 m2);
- Someșul Cald Reservoir (~930,000 m2);
- Gilău Reservoir (~550,000 m2);
- Florești Reservoir (~240,000 m2).
Calculation of Dissolved CH4
2.4.2. Urban Infrastructure Systems
- City center (CC)—characterized by dense traffic, older buildings, and mixed residential-commercial land use;
- Peripheral zone (PZ)—dominated by newer infrastructure and lower human activity.
Natural Gas (NG) End-Use Points
Sewer System Manholes (SE)
Building Basement (BS)
2.4.3. Traffic-Based Emissions (TEs)
- Street-level ambient monitoring with contrasting traffic densities;
- Direct vehicle exhaust sampling to assess fuel-specific CH4 emissions.
Street-Level Monitoring
- Point 1 (low density-one way road): ~2–3 vehicles min−1;
- Point 2 (high-density three-street intersection): >30 vehicles min−1.
Direct Vehicle Exhaust Sampling
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
- The urban aquatic system, focusing on spatial and seasonal patterns of dissolved CH4 (dCH4);
- Urban infrastructure components, including the natural gas distribution network (NG), the sewer system (SE), and building basements (BSs);
- Traffic-based emissions (TEs), encompassing both near-road atmospheric CH4 variation and direct exhaust measurements.
3.1. Urban Aquatic System (AQ)
3.1.1. Seasonal and Spatial Distribution of Dissolved Methane (dCH4)
- The hydrologically connected accumulation lakes and river stream;
- The isolated artificial ponds.
Accumulation Lakes and River
Artificial Ponds
3.1.2. Upstream–Urban Stream–Downstream Gradients
3.1.3. Land-Use Influence on dCH4 Variability
3.2. Urban Infrastructure Systems (NG, SE, BSs)
3.2.1. Natural Gas End-Use Points (NG)
3.2.2. Sewer System (SE) Manholes
3.2.3. Building Basements (BSs)
3.3. Traffic-Based Emissions (TEs)
3.3.1. Ambient Street-Level Concentrations
3.3.2. Direct Vehicle Exhaust Measurements
4. Discussion
4.1. Urban Aquatic System (AQ)
4.1.1. Oversaturation and Spatial Patterns
4.1.2. Seasonal Dynamics and Temperature
4.1.3. Environmental Drivers and Land-Use Influence
4.1.4. Biochemical Influences
4.1.5. Accumulation Lakes (Hydroelectric Reservoir Influence)
4.1.6. Urban Aquatic System as Methane Hotspots
4.2. Urban Infrastructure Systems (NG, SE, and BSs)
4.2.1. Natural Gas (NG) End-Use Points
4.2.2. Sewer System (SE) Manholes
4.2.3. Building Basements (BSs)
4.3. Traffic-Based Emissions (TEs)
4.3.1. Engine Cold Start
4.3.2. Broader Implications
| AQ (µmol L−1) | NG | SE | BS | TE | Location | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.03–185.34 | – | – | – | – | Tropical Krishna River Basin (India) | Patel et al. [20] |
| 0.39–16.74 | – | – | – | – | Two urban ponds in Brussels (Belgium) | Bauduin et al. [18] |
| 0.05–12.08 | – | – | – | – | Polluted rivers, Chongqing (China) | Wang et al. [82] |
| – | Up to 27.9 | Up to 86.1 | Up to 41.7 | – | Paris (France) | Defratyka et al. [52] |
| – | 2.2–10.2 | 2.1–13.6 | – | – | Cincinnati, Ohio (USA) | Fries et al. [95] |
| – | Up to 88.6 | – | – | – | Washington, DC (USA) | Gallagher et al. [96] |
| – | Up to 28.6 | – | – | – | Boston, MA (USA) | |
| – | Up to 60.0 | – | – | – | Manhattan, NY (USA) | |
| – | Up to 54.3 | – | – | – | Cincinnati, Ohio (USA) | |
| – | Up to 33.1 | – | – | – | Durham, NC (USA) | |
| – | – | – | – | 18.0–1068.0 | – | Nakagawa et al. [76] |
| – | – | – | – | 40–100 | – | Chanton et al. [74] |
| 0.03–10.50 | 1.5–482.0 | 1.5–1222.0 | 1.8–12.0 | 2.1–162.2 | Cluj-Napoca (Romania) | This study |
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report; Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K., Meyer, L.A., Eds.; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- IPCC. Synthesis Report on the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6); Longer Report; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Joint Research Centre. In GHG Emissions of All World Countries: 2023; European Commission: Luxembourg, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Saunois, M.; Martinez, A.; Poulter, B.; Zhang, Z.; Raymond, P.A.; Regnier, P.; Canadell, J.G.; Jackson, R.B.; Patra, P.K.; Bousquet, P.; et al. Global Methane Budget 2000–2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2025, 17, 1873–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IPCC. Observations: Atmosphere and Surface. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- NOAA. Global Monitoring Laboratory, Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases, Trends in CO2, CH4, N2O, SF6; NOAA: Silver Spring, Maryland, 2026.
- UNEP; CCAC. Global Methane Emissions: Benefits and Costs of Mitigating Methane Emissions; UNEP: Nairobi, Kenya; CCAC: Paris, France, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Tate, K.R. Soil Methane Oxidation and Land-Use Change–from Process to Mitigation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 80, 260–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tate, K.R.; Ross, D.J.; Saggar, S.; Hedley, C.B.; Dando, J.; Singh, B.K.; Lambie, S.M. Methane Uptake in Soils from Pinus Radiata Plantations, a Reverting Shrubland and Adjacent Pastures: Effects of Land-Use Change, and Soil Texture, Water and Mineral Nitrogen. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2007, 39, 1437–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crippa, M.; Guizzardi, D.; Pisoni, E.; Solazzo, E.; Guion, A.; Muntean, M.; Florczyk, A.; Schiavina, M.; Melchiorri, M.; Hutfilter, A.F. Global Anthropogenic Emissions in Urban Areas: Patterns, Trends, and Challenges. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 074033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UN. DESA World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision; UN: New York, NY, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-92-1-004314-4. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.; Paris, J.-D.; Vrekoussis, M.; Quéhé, P.-Y.; Desservettaz, M.; Kushta, J.; Dubart, F.; Demetriou, D.; Bousquet, P.; Sciare, J. Reconciling a National Methane Emission Inventory with In-Situ Measurements. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 901, 165896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vogel, F.; Ars, S.; Wunch, D.; Lavoie, J.; Gillespie, L.; Maazallahi, H.; Röckmann, T.; Nęcki, J.; Bartyzel, J.; Jagoda, P.; et al. Ground-Based Mobile Measurements to Track Urban Methane Emissions from Natural Gas in 12 Cities across Eight Countries. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 2271–2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zazzeri, G.; Graven, H.; Xu, X.; Saboya, E.; Blyth, L.; Manning, A.J.; Chawner, H.; Wu, D.; Hammer, S. Radiocarbon Measurements Reveal Underestimated Fossil CH4 and CO2 Emissions in London. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2023, 50, e2023GL103834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, L.; Lal, R.; Du, Z.; Wu, W.; Meng, F. Estimation of Nitrous Oxide and Methane Emission from Livestock of Urban Agriculture in Beijing. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2013, 170, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lowry, D.; Fisher, R.E.; France, J.L.; Coleman, M.; Lanoisellé, M.; Zazzeri, G.; Nisbet, E.G.; Shaw, J.T.; Allen, G.; Pitt, J.; et al. Environmental Baseline Monitoring for Shale Gas Development in the UK: Identification and Geochemical Characterisation of Local Source Emissions of Methane to Atmosphere. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 708, 134600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Röckmann, T.; Eyer, S.; Van Der Veen, C.; Popa, M.E.; Tuzson, B.; Monteil, G.; Houweling, S.; Harris, E.; Brunner, D.; Fischer, H.; et al. In Situ Observations of the Isotopic Composition of Methane at the Cabauwtall Tower Site. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 10469–10487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bauduin, T.; Gypens, N.; Borges, A.V. Sub-Daily Variability of Carbon Dioxide, Methane, and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Two Urban Ponds in Brussels (Belgium). J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 373, 123627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brown, A.M.; Bass, A.M.; Skiba, U.; MacDonald, J.M.; Pickard, A.E. Urban Landscapes and Legacy Industry Provide Hotspots for Riverine Greenhouse Gases: A Source-to-Sea Study of the River Clyde. Water Res. 2023, 236, 119969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, L.; Singh, R.; Thottathil, S.D. Land Use Drivers of Riverine Methane Dynamics in a Tropical River Basin, India. Water Res. 2023, 228, 119380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qing, X.; Qi, B.; Lin, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zang, K.; Liu, S.; Ma, Q.; Qiu, S.; Jiang, K.; Xiong, H.; et al. Characteristics of the Methane (CH4) Mole Fraction in a Typical City and Suburban Site in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2022, 13, 101498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Li, H.; Xiao, Q.; Li, X. Urban Rivers Are Hotspots of Riverine Greenhouse Gas (N2O, CH4, CO2) Emissions in the Mixed-Landscape Chaohu Lake Basin. Water Res. 2021, 189, 116624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, G.; Wang, D.; Sun, T.; Ding, Y.; Chen, S.; Li, Y.; Sun, H.; Wu, C.; Yu, Z.; Chen, Z. Emission of Greenhouse Gas from Urban Polluted River during Different Rainfall Events: Typhoon and Storm Will Promote Stronger Evasions. J. Hydrol. 2023, 625, 130166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duren, R.M.; Thorpe, A.K.; Foster, K.T.; Rafiq, T.; Hopkins, F.M.; Yadav, V.; Bue, B.D.; Thompson, D.R.; Conley, S.; Colombi, N.K.; et al. California’s Methane Super-Emitters. Nature 2019, 575, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García, M.Á.; Sánchez, M.L.; Pérez, I.A.; Ozores, M.I.; Pardo, N. Influence of Atmospheric Stability and Transport on CH4 Concentrations in Northern Spain. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 550, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, J.P.; Ars, S.; Vogel, F.; Regehr, A.; Kang, M. Differentiating and Mitigating Methane Emissions from Fugitive Leaks from Natural Gas Distribution, Historic Landfills, and Manholes in Montréal, Canada. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 16686–16694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xueref-Remy, I.; Zazzeri, G.; Bréon, F.M.; Vogel, F.; Ciais, P.; Lowry, D.; Nisbet, E.G. Anthropogenic Methane Plume Detection from Point Sources in the Paris Megacity Area and Characterization of Their δ13C Signature. Atmos. Environ. 2020, 222, 117055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hendrick, M.F.; Ackley, R.; Sanaie-Movahed, B.; Tang, X.; Phillips, N.G. Fugitive Methane Emissions from Leak-Prone Natural Gas Distribution Infrastructure in Urban Environments. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 213, 710–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, R.B.; Down, A.; Phillips, N.G.; Ackley, R.C.; Cook, C.W.; Plata, D.L.; Zhao, K. Natural Gas Pipeline Leaks Across Washington, DC. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 2051–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McKain, K.; Down, A.; Raciti, S.M.; Budney, J.; Hutyra, L.R.; Floerchinger, C.; Herndon, S.C.; Nehrkorn, T.; Zahniser, M.S.; Jackson, R.B.; et al. Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Infrastructure and Use in the Urban Region of Boston, Massachusetts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 1941–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Foster, C.S.; Crosman, E.T.; Holland, L.; Mallia, D.V.; Fasoli, B.; Bares, R.; Horel, J.; Lin, J.C. Confirmation of Elevated Methane Emissions in Utah’s Uintah Basin With Ground-Based Observations and a High-Resolution Transport Model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2017, 122, 13026–13044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heimburger, A.M.F.; Harvey, R.M.; Shepson, P.B.; Stirm, B.H.; Gore, C.; Turnbull, J.; Cambaliza, M.O.L.; Salmon, O.E.; Kerlo, A.-E.M.; Lavoie, T.N.; et al. Assessing the Optimized Precision of the Aircraft Mass Balance Method for Measurement of Urban Greenhouse Gas Emission Rates through Averaging. Elem. Sci. Anthr. 2017, 5, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, S.; Lan, X.; Talbot, R.; Liu, L. Characterizing Anthropogenic Methane Sources in the Houston and Barnett Shale Areas of Texas Using the Isotopic Signature δ13C in CH4. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 696, 133856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Ye, J.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Z.; Jia, Q.; Nie, Y.; Li, L.; Liu, H.; Benoit, G. Variations in CH4 and CO2 Productions and Emissions Driven by Pollution Sources in Municipal Sewers: An Assessment of the Role of Dissolved Organic Matter Components and Microbiota. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Wu, J.; Zhao, J.; Yang, H.; Attaran Dovom, H.; Sivakumar, M.; Jiang, G. A Critical Review of Sulfide and Methane Control in Urban Sewer Systems Using Nitrogen Compounds. Water Res. 2025, 277, 123314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daelman, M.R.J.; van Voorthuizen, E.M.; van Dongen, U.G.J.M.; Volcke, E.I.P.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Methane Emission during Municipal Wastewater Treatment. Water Res. 2012, 46, 3657–3670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eijo-Río, E.; Petit-Boix, A.; Villalba, G.; Suárez-Ojeda, M.E.; Marin, D.; Amores, M.J.; Aldea, X.; Rieradevall, J.; Gabarrell, X. Municipal Sewer Networks as Sources of Nitrous Oxide, Methane and Hydrogen Sulphide Emissions: A Review and Case Studies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 2084–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joo, J.; Jeong, S.; Shin, J.; Chang, D.Y. Missing Methane Emissions from Urban Sewer Networks. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 342, 123101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, X.; Jin, X.K.; Guo, W.; Zhang, C.; Shan, Y.L.; Du, M.X.; Tillotson, M.R.; Yang, H.; Liao, X.W.; Li, Y.P. China’s Urban Methane Emissions from Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant. Earth’s Future 2019, 7, 480–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, D.; Tao, L.; Sun, K.; Golston, L.M.; Miller, D.J.; Zhu, T.; Qin, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Mauzerall, D.L.; Zondlo, M.A. Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Vehicles in China. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hu, N.; Liu, S.; Gao, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Lee, X. Large Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Vehicles in Chinese Cities. Atmos. Environ. 2018, 187, 374–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, E.K.; Jensen, T.E.; Wallington, T.J. Methane Emissions from Vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 2005–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Popa, M.E.; Vollmer, M.K.; Jordan, A.; Brand, W.A.; Pathirana, S.L.; Rothe, M.; Röckmann, T. Vehicle Emissions of Greenhouse Gases and Related Tracers from a Tunnel Study: CO:CO2, N2O:CO2, CH4:CO2, O2:CO2 Ratios, and the Stable Isotopes 13C and 18O in CO2 and CO. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 2105–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atherton, E.; Risk, D.; Fougère, C.; Lavoie, M.; Marshall, A.; Werring, J.; Williams, J.P.; Minions, C. Mobile Measurement of Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Developments in Northeastern British Columbia, Canada. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017, 17, 12405–12420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cambaliza, M.O.L.; Shepson, P.B.; Bogner, J.; Caulton, D.R.; Stirm, B.; Sweeney, C.; Montzka, S.A.; Gurney, K.R.; Spokas, K.; Salmon, O.E.; et al. Quantification and Source Apportionment of the Methane Emission Flux from the City of Indianapolis. Elem. Sci. Anthr. 2015, 3, 000037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hugenholtz, C.H.; Vollrath, C.; Gough, T.; Wearmouth, C.; Fox, T.; Barchyn, T.; Billinghurst, C. Methane Emissions from Above-Ground Natural Gas Distribution Facilities in the Urban Environment: A Fence Line Methodology and Case Study in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2021, 71, 1319–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamb, B.K.; Cambaliza, M.O.L.; Davis, K.J.; Edburg, S.L.; Ferrara, T.W.; Floerchinger, C.; Heimburger, A.M.F.; Herndon, S.; Lauvaux, T.; Lavoie, T.; et al. Direct and Indirect Measurements and Modeling of Methane Emissions in Indianapolis, Indiana. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 8910–8917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mays, K.L.; Shepson, P.B.; Stirm, B.H.; Karion, A.; Sweeney, C.; Gurney, K.R. Aircraft-Based Measurements of the Carbon Footprint of Indianapolis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 7816–7823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Phillips, N.G.; Ackley, R.; Crosson, E.R.; Down, A.; Hutyra, L.R.; Brondfield, M.; Karr, J.D.; Zhao, K.; Jackson, R.B. Mapping Urban Pipeline Leaks: Methane Leaks across Boston. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 173, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pitt, J.R.; Lopez-Coto, I.; Karion, A.; Hajny, K.D.; Tomlin, J.; Kaeser, R.; Jayarathne, T.; Stirm, B.H.; Floerchinger, C.R.; Loughner, C.P.; et al. Underestimation of Thermogenic Methane Emissions in New York City. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 9147–9157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weichenthal, S.; Van Rijswijk, D.; Kulka, R.; You, H.; Van Ryswyk, K.; Willey, J.; Dugandzic, R.; Sutcliffe, R.; Moulton, J.; Baike, M.; et al. The Impact of a Landfill Fire on Ambient Air Quality in the North: A Case Study in Iqaluit, Canada. Environ. Res. 2015, 142, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Defratyka, S.M.; Paris, J.-D.; Yver-Kwok, C.; Fernandez, J.M.; Korben, P.; Bousquet, P. Mapping Urban Methane Sources in Paris, France. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 8583–8591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gioli, B.; Toscano, P.; Lugato, E.; Matese, A.; Miglietta, F.; Zaldei, A.; Vaccari, F.P. Methane and Carbon Dioxide Fluxes and Source Partitioning in Urban Areas: The Case Study of Florence, Italy. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 164, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Helfter, C.; Tremper, A.H.; Halios, C.H.; Kotthaus, S.; Bjorkegren, A.; Grimmond, C.S.B.; Barlow, J.F.; Nemitz, E. Spatial and Temporal Variability of Urban Fluxes of Methane, Carbon Monoxideand Carbon Dioxide above London, UK. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 10543–10557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maazallahi, H.; Fernandez, J.M.; Menoud, M.; Zavala-Araiza, D.; Weller, Z.D.; Schwietzke, S.; von Fischer, J.C.; Denier van der Gon, H.; Röckmann, T. Methane Mapping, Emission Quantification, and Attribution in Two European Cities: Utrecht (NL) and Hamburg (DE). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 14717–14740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricci, A.; Cremonini, S.; Severi, P.; Tassi, F.; Vaselli, O.; Rizzo, A.L.; Caracausi, A.; Grassa, F.; Fiebig, J.; Capaccioni, B. Sources and Migration Pathways of Methane and Light Hydrocarbons in the Subsurface of the Southern Po River Basin (Northern Italy). Mar. Pet. Geol. 2023, 147, 105981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shorter, J.H.; Mcmanus, J.B.; Kolb, C.E.; Allwine, E.J.; Lamb, B.K.; Mosher, B.W.; Harriss, R.C.; Partchatka, U.; Fischer, H.; Harris, G.W.; et al. Methane Emission Measurements in Urban Areas in Eastern Germany. J. Atmos. Chem. 1996, 24, 121–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wietzel, J.B.; Schmidt, M. Methane Emission Mapping and Quantification in Two Medium-Sized Cities in Germany: Heidelberg and Schwetzingen. Atmos. Environ. X 2023, 20, 100228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandez, J.M.; Maazallahi, H.; France, J.L.; Menoud, M.; Corbu, M.; Ardelean, M.; Calcan, A.; Townsend-Small, A.; van der Veen, C.; Fisher, R.E.; et al. Street-Level Methane Emissions of Bucharest, Romania and the Dominance of Urban Wastewater. Atmos. Environ. X 2022, 13, 100153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popiţa, G.-E.; Frunzeti, N.; Ionescu, A.; Lazăr, A.-L.; Baciu, C.; Popovic, A.; Pop, C.; Faur, V.-C.; Proorocu, M. Evaluation Of Carbon Dioxide And Methane Emission From Cluj-Napoca Municipal Landfill, Romania. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2015, 14, 1389–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soporan, V.F.; Nascutiu, L.; Soporan, B.; Pavai, C. Case Studies of Methane Dispersion Patterns and Odor Strength in Vicinity of Municipal Solid Waste Landfill of Cluj–Napoca, Romania, Using Numerical Modeling. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2015, 6, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Es, J.; Van Der Veen, C.; Baciu, C.; Hmoudah, M.; Menoud, M.; Henne, S.; Röckmann, T. Methane Sources in Cluj-Napoca, Romania: Insights From Isotopic Analysis. JGR Atmos. 2025, 130, e2024JD043015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- INS. Recensământul Populației Și Locuințelor, Runda 2021—Date Provizorii În Profil Teritorial; National Institute of Statistics (INS): Kigali, Rwanda, 2023.
- Westsystem High Resolution CH4 and CO2 Portable Fluxmeter 2016. Available online: https://www.westgroupnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/12_Portable_fluxmeter.pdf (accessed on 3 February 2024).
- AERIS Technologies. (USA) Locate Natural Gas Leaks with Unmatched Sensitivity, Ease-of-Use, and Thermogenic vs. Biogenic Discrimination 2024; AERIS Technologies: Hayward, CA, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Capasso, G.; Inguaggiato, S. A Simple Method for the Determination of Dissolved Gases in Natural Waters. Appl. Therm. Waters Vulcano Island. Appl. Geochem. 1998, 13, 631–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahangir, M.M.R.; Johnston, P.; Khalil, M.I.; Grant, J.; Somers, C.; Richards, K.G. Evaluation of Headspace Equilibration Methods for Quantifying Greenhouse Gases in Groundwater. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 111, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kampbell, D.H.; Wilson, J.T.; Vandegrift, S.A. Dissolved Oxygen and Methane in Water by a GC Headspace Equilibration Technique. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 1989, 36, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weiss, R.F. The Solubility of Nitrogen, Oxygen and Argon in Water and Seawater. Deep. Sea Res. Oceanogr. Abstr. 1970, 17, 721–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donval, J.P.; Guyader, V. Analysis of Hydrogen and Methane in Seawater by “Headspace” Method: Determination at Trace Level with an Automatic Headspace Sampler. Talanta 2017, 162, 408–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Mann, H.B.; Whitney, D.R. On a Test of Whether One of Two Random Variables Is Stochastically Larger than the Other. Ann. Math. Statist. 1947, 18, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKnight, P.E.; Najab, J. Mann-Whitney U Test. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology; Weiner, I.B., Craighead, W.E., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; ISBN 978-0-470-17024-3. [Google Scholar]
- Filipescu, M.; Huma, I. Geochemistry of Natural Gases; Academiei Publ. House: Bucharest, Romania, 1979. (In Romanian) [Google Scholar]
- Chanton, J.P.; Rutkowski, C.M.; Schwartz, C.C.; Ward, D.E.; Boring, L. Factors Influencing the Stable Carbon Isotopic Signature of Methane from Combustion and Biomass Burning. J. Geophys. Res. 2000, 105, 1867–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, M.; Brimblecombe, P.; Gali, N.K.; Ghadikolaei, M.A.; Wei, P.; Li, X.; Yang, S.; Wei, Y.; Ning, Z. Roadside Measurement of N2O and CH4 Emissions from Vehicles in Hong Kong. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 956, 177241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakagawa, F.; Tsunogai, U.; Komatsu, D.D.; Yamada, K.; Yoshida, N.; Moriizumi, J.; Nagamine, K.; Iida, T.; Ikebe, Y. Automobile Exhaust as a Source of 13C- and D-Enriched Atmospheric Methane in Urban Areas. Org. Geochem. 2005, 36, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kruskal, W.H.; Wallis, W.A. Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1952, 47, 583–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunn, O.J. Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums. Technometrics 1964, 6, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, W.; Zheng, X.; Butterbach-Bahl, K.; Li, S.; Han, S. An Urban Polluted River as a Significant Hotspot for Water–Atmosphere Exchange of CH4 and N2O. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 264, 114770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Premke, K.; Dharanivasan, G.; Steger, K.; Nitzsche, K.N.; Jayavignesh, V.; Nambi, I.M.; Seshadri, S. Anthropogenic Impact on Tropical Perennial River in South India: Snapshot of Carbon Dynamics and Bacterial Community Composition. Water 2020, 12, 1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leng, P.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Koschorreck, M.; Li, F.; Qiao, Y.; Xia, J. Deciphering Large-Scale Spatial Pattern and Modulators of Dissolved Greenhouse Gases (CO2, CH4, and N2O) along the Yangtze River, China. J. Hydrol. 2023, 623, 129710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; He, Y.; Chen, H.; Yuan, X.; Peng, C.; Yue, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, L. CH4 Concentrations and Fluxes in a Subtropical Metropolitan River Network: Watershed Urbanization Impacts and Environmental Controls. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 622–623, 1079–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, W.; Xu, Y.J.; Ni, M.; Li, S. Land Use and Hydrological Factors Control Concentrations and Diffusive Fluxes of Riverine Dissolved Carbon Dioxide and Methane in Low-Order Streams. Water Res. 2023, 231, 119615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dupuis, D.; Sprague, E.; Docherty, K.M.; Koretsky, C.M. The Influence of Road Salt on Seasonal Mixing, Redox Stratification and Methane Concentrations in Urban Kettle Lakes. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 661, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguirrezabala-Cámpano, T.; Gonzalez-Valencia, R.; García-Pérez, V.; Torres-Alvarado, R.; Pangala, S.R.; Thalasso, F. Spatial and Seasonal Dynamics of the Methane Cycle in a Tropical Coastal Lagoon and Its Tributary River. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 825, 154074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Demarty, M.; Bastien, J. GHG Emissions from Hydroelectric Reservoirs in Tropical and Equatorial Regions: Review of 20 Years of CH4 Emission Measurements. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 4197–4206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reis, P.C.J.; Ruiz-González, C.; Crevecoeur, S.; Soued, C.; Prairie, Y.T. Rapid Shifts in Methanotrophic Bacterial Communities Mitigate Methane Emissions from a Tropical Hydropower Reservoir and Its Downstream River. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 748, 141374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamb, B.K.; Edburg, S.L.; Ferrara, T.W.; Howard, T.; Harrison, M.R.; Kolb, C.E.; Townsend-Small, A.; Dyck, W.; Possolo, A.; Whetstone, J.R. Direct Measurements Show Decreasing Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Local Distribution Systems in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 5161–5169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, X.; Zhong, X.; Dong, J.; Xie, D.; Lu, W. Measuring Methane Emissions during the Installation of Residential and Commercial Natural Gas Meters in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 904, 166629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plant, G.; Kort, E.A.; Floerchinger, C.; Gvakharia, A.; Vimont, I.; Sweeney, C. Large Fugitive Methane Emissions From Urban Centers Along the U.S. East Coast. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2019, 46, 8500–8507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foley, J.; Yuan, Z.; Lant, P. Dissolved Methane in Rising Main Sewer Systems: Field Measurements and Simple Model Development for Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 60, 2963–2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guisasola, A.; de Haas, D.; Keller, J.; Yuan, Z. Methane Formation in Sewer Systems. Water Res. 2008, 42, 1421–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guisasola, A.; Sharma, K.R.; Keller, J.; Yuan, Z. Development of a Model for Assessing Methane Formation in Rising Main Sewers. Water Res. 2009, 43, 2874–2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Majumdar, D.; Ray, R.; Biswas, B.; Bhatia, A. Urban Sewage Canal Sediment in Kolkata Metropolis (India) Is a Potent Producer of Greenhouse Gases. Urban Clim. 2023, 51, 101688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fries, A.E.; Schifman, L.A.; Shuster, W.D.; Townsend-Small, A. Street-Level Emissions of Methane and Nitrous Oxide from the Wastewater Collection System in Cincinnati, Ohio. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 236, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallagher, M.E.; Down, A.; Ackley, R.C.; Zhao, K.; Phillips, N.; Jackson, R.B. Natural Gas Pipeline Replacement Programs Reduce Methane Leaks and Improve Consumer Safety. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2015, 2, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venturi, S.; Cabassi, J.; Tassi, F.; Maioli, G.; Randazzo, A.; Capecchiacci, F.; Vaselli, O. Near-Surface Atmospheric Concentrations of Greenhouse Gases (CO2 and CH4) in Florence Urban Area: Inferring Emitting Sources through Carbon Isotopic Analysis. Urban Clim. 2021, 39, 100968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bezyk, Y.; Górka, M.; Sówka, I.; Nęcki, J.; Strąpoć, D. Temporal Dynamics and Controlling Factors of CO2 and CH4 Variability in the Urban Atmosphere of Wroclaw, Poland. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 893, 164771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yacovitch, T.; Herndon, S.; Floerchinger, C.; Zahniser, M.; McGovern, R.; Kolfer, J.; Petron, G. Ground Measurements of Ethane to Methane Ratios in the Dallas/Fort-Worth Area 2026.
- Rella, C.W.; Hoffnagle, J.; He, Y.; Tajima, S. Local- and Regional-Scale Measurements of CH4, δ13 CH4, and C2 H6 in the Uintah Basin Using a Mobile Stable Isotope Analyzer. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2015, 8, 4539–4559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heeb, N.V.; Forss, A.-M.; Saxer, C.J.; Wilhelm, P. Methane, Benzene and Alkyl Benzene Cold Start Emission Data of Gasoline-Driven Passenger Cars Representing the Vehicle Technology of the Last Two Decades. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 5185–5195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Bank Country Climate and Development Report—Romania 2023. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/romania/publication/country-climate-and-development-report-for-romania (accessed on 2 November 2023).
- EEA. Electric Vehicles. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/topics/in-depth/electric-vehicles?activeTab=fa515f0c-9ab0-493c-b4cd-58a32dfaae0a (accessed on 22 June 2025).











| Season | Time | Temperature | Wind | Sky |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring | May 2022 | 7 to 18 °C | 8 km/h (Southwest) | Cloudy |
| Summer | August 2024 | 25 to 30 °C | 7.7 km/h (Southwest) | Clear and sunny |
| Autumn | October 2023 | 5 to 15 °C | 7 km/h (South) | Foggy and cloudy |
| Winter | December 2022 | −6 to 3 °C | 6.2 km/h (Southeast) | Cloudy |
| Season | Mean | SD | Median | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring | 0.769 | 0.611 | 0.580 | 0.156 | 2.903 |
| Summer | 0.884 | 0.751 | 0.660 | 0.076 | 3.615 |
| Autumn | 0.409 | 0.274 | 0.337 | 0.054 | 1.191 |
| Winter | 0.464 | 0.594 | 0.264 | 0.028 | 2.404 |
| System | Mean | SD | Median | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQ | 0.807 | 1.229 | 0.476 | 0.028 | 10.495 |
| NG | 15.4 | 60.5 | 3.4 | 1.5 | 482.0 |
| SE | 16.4 | 109.1 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1222.0 |
| BS | 3.9 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 12.0 |
| VE | 28.5 | 37.8 | 5.8 | 2.1 | 162.2 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Hmoudah, M.; Baciu, C. A System-Based Assessment of Methane Sources in an Eastern European Urban Environment (Cluj-Napoca, Romania). Atmosphere 2026, 17, 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17040351
Hmoudah M, Baciu C. A System-Based Assessment of Methane Sources in an Eastern European Urban Environment (Cluj-Napoca, Romania). Atmosphere. 2026; 17(4):351. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17040351
Chicago/Turabian StyleHmoudah, Mustafa, and Călin Baciu. 2026. "A System-Based Assessment of Methane Sources in an Eastern European Urban Environment (Cluj-Napoca, Romania)" Atmosphere 17, no. 4: 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17040351
APA StyleHmoudah, M., & Baciu, C. (2026). A System-Based Assessment of Methane Sources in an Eastern European Urban Environment (Cluj-Napoca, Romania). Atmosphere, 17(4), 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17040351

