Spatiotemporal Dynamic Evolution Characteristics of Net Carbon Sinks in County-Level Farmland Ecosystems in Hunan Province, China
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Methodology and Data
2.1. Overview of the Study Region
2.2. Data Source and Processing
2.3. Research Methods
2.3.1. Calculation Method of Carbon Absorption
2.3.2. Calculation Method of Carbon Emissions
- (1)
- Carbon Emissions from Farmland Inputs
- (2)
- Carbon emissions from open burning of crop residues are as follows:
- (3)
- Carbon emissions from food consumption
- (4)
- Carbon emissions from farmland soil respiration
2.3.3. Estimation of Net Carbon Sinks
2.3.4. Standard Deviation Ellipse
2.3.5. Spatial Correlation
2.3.6. Exploratory Spatiotemporal Data Analysis Methods
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Temporal Characteristics of Net Carbon Sinks
3.2. Spatial Characteristics of Net Carbon Sinks
3.3. Local Spatial Association Patterns
3.4. Dynamic Evolution of Local Spatial Correlation Patterns
3.5. Analysis of Spatiotemporal Transfer of Local Spatial Correlation Patterns
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- During the period 2005–2020, the center of gravity for net carbon sinks in county-level farmland ecosystems of Hunan Province was predominantly located within Xiangxiang City, following a dynamic trajectory of “northwest–southwest–northwest–northeast–southwest–northwest.” This path reflects a general northwestward migration of the center of gravity, indicating that western and northern counties exhibited higher growth rates in net carbon sequestration compared to other regions. Analysis of the Standard Deviational Ellipse (SDE) further reveals a “northeast–southwest” spatial distribution pattern of net carbon sinks in county-level farmland ecosystems of Hunan Province, which demonstrates a contracting trend with increasing spatial agglomeration over the study period.
- (2)
- From 2005 to 2020, the net carbon sinks of county-level farmland ecosystems in Hunan Province showed a significant spatial positive correlation, and the degree of aggregation gradually increased amid fluctuations. From a local perspective, the clusters of net carbon sinks of county-level farmland ecosystems in Hunan Province show a significant spatial agglomeration characteristic of “high in the east and low in the west”. The HH clusters were mainly distributed in some counties in eastern Hunan represented by Xiangtan County, and the LL clusters were mainly distributed in some counties in eastern Hunan represented by Yuelu District and Yuhua District. Over time, the LL clusters moved from western Hunan to eastern Hunan. The spatial scale and number of counties in different clusters types fluctuated slightly over time.
- (3)
- From 2005 to 2020, the dynamic evolution of the local spatial correlation pattern of net carbon sinks in county-level farmland ecosystems in Hunan Province showed obvious differences. The areas with larger LISA time path moving lengths are mainly distributed in some counties in eastern and central Hunan, and the overall trend is eastern Hunan > central Hunan > northern and southern Hunan. This shows that eastern and central Hunan have more dynamic local spatial structures, while southern and northern Hunan have relatively stable local spatial structures. The curvature of the LISA time path shows a trend of decreasing horizontally from the center to the east and west. Leiyang City, Jiahe County and Shigu District have the greatest volatility in the spatial dependence direction, while the spatial dependence direction of Chaling County, Longshan County and Ningxiang City is the most stable.
- (4)
- From 2005 to 2020, the LISA spatiotemporal transition analysis showed that the probability of type I spatiotemporal transition of net carbon sinks in county-level farmland ecosystems of Hunan Province is 82.51%, that is, the types without spatiotemporal transition account for the majority. This indicates that the local spatial correlation pattern of net carbon sinks in county-level farmland ecosystems of Hunan Province is relatively stable, and the local spatial linkage in most counties is weak. And there is a lack of motivation to jointly move to the HH clusters, and the spatial agglomeration shows a high path locking feature. The factors of counties themselves play a decisive role in the change in the types of net carbon sinks of farmland ecosystems.
5. Policy Recommendations
- In response to the pattern of “the center of gravity shifting westward and the divergence between eastern and western regions,” implement targeted regional adjustments by optimizing land use structures. The net carbon sink center of Hunan Province’s farmland ecosystems has shifted northwestward, exhibiting a “northeast–southwest” spatial distribution with increasing concentration. The LL aggregation zone has migrated from western to eastern Hunan. Consequently, eastern Hunan should implement a “construction land reduction and efficiency enhancement with farmland resilience improvement” plan. Strictly delineate urban development boundaries and permanent basic farmland: Immediately halt the encroachment of disorderly urban expansion on surrounding high-quality farmland. Stabilize the carbon sink baseline through rigid constraints in the master land use plan. This is the most direct prerequisite for curbing the degradation of carbon sink functions in the region. Simultaneously, implement the “urban–rural integrated complex” model, encouraging the consolidation of fragmented farmland within and on the periphery of urban clusters into multifunctional spaces combining ecological landscapes, recreational education, and efficient production. Require new development projects to incorporate high-standard green infrastructure (e.g., ecological ditches, buffer zones) to reduce non-point source pollution and lower soil respiration carbon emissions caused by environmental stress. Implement rice straw shredding and deep plowing for return to fields: Immediately shift from traditional burning or removal practices through agricultural machinery subsidy policies.
- Overcoming the “spatial lock-in” effect by stimulating county-level transformation through altered field management practices. Spatiotemporal analysis of net carbon sinks in Hunan’s county-level farmland ecosystems reveals low transition probabilities, with county-specific factors playing a decisive role and a lack of shared motivation for transitioning to HH zones. Therefore, counties should enhance their carbon sequestration capacity by launching a “farmland management measures carbon sink certification and subsidy” program. Direct subsidies to measurable land use practices. Farmers adopting no-till/reduced-till farming, straw incorporation, and ecological ditch restoration receive direct subsidies based on applied area. These measures immediately reduce soil disturbance and improve aeration, directly lowering emissions from the critical source of “agricultural soil respiration.” Simultaneously, promote “smart drip irrigation” technology, particularly in the hilly regions of central and southern Hunan. By subsidizing drip irrigation equipment, directly change irrigation methods to reduce the anaerobic conditions necessary for methane production, thereby lowering methane emissions from paddy fields.
- Leveraging the sensitivity of “dynamically unstable zones,” prioritize land use change as the core of policy experimentation. Local spatial structures in eastern and central Hunan exhibit dynamic instability and heightened sensitivity to change. Special zones for monitoring land use change responses could be established in these areas. Priority should be given to rapidly advancing farmland “mechanization-friendly” transformation (e.g., consolidating small plots into larger ones, converting slopes into terraces) while simultaneously deploying IoT sensors to monitor real-time changes in soil carbon stocks, moisture levels, and respiration rates post-land consolidation. This approach would yield immediate first-hand data on the net carbon sink impacts of different engineering measures, providing evidence for province-wide implementation. Pilot the “farmland fertility enhancement and carbon sink gain” project. In suburban areas near cities, encourage the immediate conversion of degraded or polluted farmland to plant seedlings with strong carbon sequestration capabilities, energy crops, or wetland systems for ecological restoration. By altering land use types, achieve rapid conversion and enhancement of carbon sink functions.
- Strengthening Scientific and Technological Support: building an intelligent monitoring and decision-making platform coupled with land use.
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
SDE | Standard deviational ellipse |
ESTDA | Exploratory spatiotemporal data analysis |
IPCC | Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change |
RPR | Residue-to-product ratio |
LISA | Local Indicators of Spatial Association |
HH | High-High Cluster |
HL | High-Low Outlier |
LH | Low-High Outlier |
LL | Low-Low Cluster |
References
- Kumar, S.; Chatterjee, U.; Raj, A.D.; Sooryamol, K.R. Global warming and climate crisis/extreme events. In Climate Crisis: Adaptive Approaches and Sustainability; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piao, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, K.; Li, X.; Bastos, A.; Canadell, J.G.; Ciais, P.; Friedlingstein, P.; Sitch, S. Interannual variation of terrestrial carbon cycle: Issues and perspectives. Glob. Change Biol. 2020, 26, 300–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Li, M.; Sun, J.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Xiong, X. Spatiotemporal Variations and Driving Factors of Carbon Emissions Related to Energy Consumption in the Construction Industry of China. Energies 2025, 18, 3700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Sun, X.; Wu, W.; Liu, Z.; Fang, G.; Yang, P. Agroecosystem services: A review of concepts, indicators, assessment methods and future research perspectives. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 142, 109218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, X.; Wang, H.; Lu, X.; Zheng, X.; Wang, L.; Chen, W. Implications of the consumption-based accounting for future national emissions budgets. Clim. Policy 2022, 22, 1306–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, S.K. Soil and Environmental Variables Influencing Greenhouse Gas Cycling in an Agroecosystem. In Greenhouse Gas Regulating Microorganisms in Soil Ecosystems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, Y.Y.; Hao, J.M.; Niu, L.A.; Chen, L. Carbon cycle and carbon efficiency of farmland ecosystems in Quzhou, Hebei Province. Resour. Sci. 2016, 38, 918–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Wang, S.; Zhuang, Q.; Jin, X.; Bian, Z.; Zhou, M.; Meng, Z.; Han, C.; Guo, X.; Zhang, Y.; et al. A review on carbon source and sink in arable land ecosystems. Land 2022, 11, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Liao, L.; Long, H.; Qin, J. Effects of land use transitions on ecosystem services value: A case study of Hunan province. Geogr. Res. 2015, 34, 691–700. [Google Scholar]
- Fortuniak, K.; Pawlak, W.; Siedlecki, M.; Chambers, S.; Bednorz, L. Temperate mire fluctuations from carbon sink to carbon source following changes in water table. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 756, 144071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, M.Q.; Cui, Y.P.; Ma, X.Z.; Liu, P.; Fan, L.; Lu, Y.Y.; Liu, W.; Chen, Z. Study on carbon sink estimation of cropland ecosystem in Henan province. J. Ecol. Rural Environ. 2022, 38, 1129–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Fang, Y.; Wei, J.; Lin, J.; Chen, P.; Zhu, C. Carbon footprint-based temporal and spatial analysis on carbon sources/sinks at farmlands in Anhui Province. Fujian J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 36, 78–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Guo, L.; Sun, B.; Kong, W.; Tang, S. Carbon footprint of crop production in China from 1993 to 2013 and its spatial distribution. J. Appl. Ecol. 2017, 28, 2577–2587. [Google Scholar]
- Guotong, Q.; Fei, C.; Na, W.; Dandan, Z. Inter-annual variation patterns in the carbon footprint of farmland ecosystems in Guangdong Province, China. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 14134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Zhang, W.Z.; Yu, J.H. Decomposition and influence factors of district difference of China agricultural production efficiency under the constraint of carbon emission. Econ. Geogr. 2016, 36, 150–157. [Google Scholar]
- Holka, M.; Kowalska, J.; Jakubowska, M. Reducing carbon footprint of agriculture—Can organic farming help to mitigate climate change? Agriculture 2022, 12, 1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruhwiler, L.; Basu, S.; Butler, J.H.; Chatterjee, A.; Dlugokencky, E.; Kenney, M.A.; McComiskey, A.; Montzka, S.A.; Stanitski, D. Observations of greenhouse gases as climate indicators. Clim. Change 2021, 165, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Y.; Wu, L.; Xie, P.; Pan, X. Allocation and optimization of carbon emission permits considering fairness and efficiency under the dual-carbon background. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 1036771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verschuuren, J. Achieving agricultural greenhouse gas emission reductions in the EU post-2030: What options do we have? Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 2022, 31, 246–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, G. Spatial-temporal distribution pattern and driving factors of agricultural carbon sinks in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from the perspective of carbon neutrality. J. Agric. Sci. 2024, 162, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.Y.; Xue, L.; Xue, Y. Spatial-temporal characteristics of China’s agricultural net carbon sink. J. Nat. Resour. 2016, 31, 596–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunan Provincial Rural Economic Survey Team. Hunan Provincial Rural Statistical Yearbook; Hunan Provincial Bureau of Statistics: Changsha, China, 2020.
- Weng, L.Y.; Zhu, Z.Y.; Han, X.G.; Tan, J.Z. Spatial-temporal pattern of net carbon sink of farmland vegetation in Jiangsu Province. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2018, 34, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hui, D.; Deng, Q.; Tian, H.; Luo, Y. Global climate change and greenhouse gases emissions in terrestrial ecosystems. In Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 23–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Z.Y.; Meng, Y.L.; Xu, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, Z.G. Temporal and Spatial Difference in Carbon Footprint of Regional Farmland Ecosystem-- Taking Jiangsu Province as a Case. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2012, 31, 1034–1041. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, J.; Zha, L.S. Research on dynamic change of vegetation carbon storage of crops in the Wan Jiang city belt. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2012, 21, 1507–1513. [Google Scholar]
- Eggleston, H.-S.; Buendia, L.; Miwa, K.; Ngara, T.; Tanabe, K. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; Preparation of the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Plan: Tokyo, Japan, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- West, T.O.; Marland, G. A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: Comparing tillage practices in the United States. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 91, 217–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokal, K.; Kachel, M. Impact of Agriculture on Greenhouse Gas Emissions—A Review. Energies 2025, 18, 2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubey, A.; Lal, R. Carbon footprint and sustainability of agricultural production systems in Punjab, India, and Ohio, USA. J. Crop Improv. 2009, 23, 332–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.H. Analysis method on reducing emission of SO2 and CO2 by rural energy construction. Trans. CSAE 1999, 15, 169–172. [Google Scholar]
- Du, J.; Luo, J.; Wang, R.; Wang, X.H. The estimation and analysis of spatio-temporal change patterns of carbon functions in major grain producing area. J. Ecol. Rural Environ. 2019, 35, 1242–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, L.; Zhao, J. Effect of burning straw in rural areas on ecological environment quality. Arab. J. Geosci. 2021, 14, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Z.; Hao, J.; Xing, H. Spatial-temporal change of Chinese resident food consumption carbon emissions and its driving mechanism. Prog. Geogr. 2020, 39, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Przybył, J.; Wojcieszak, D.; Garbowski, T. Effect of Corn Stover Ensiling on Methane Production and Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Energies 2024, 17, 6179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Wei, X.; Luan, X.; Li, J.; Yang, Y.; Pang, J.; Gao, F. Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Different Farming Measures on Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Farmland in China. Land 2025, 14, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, J.F.; Zhang, X.H.; Pan, G.X.; Li, L.Q. Diurnal variation of soil basal respiration and CO2 emission from a typical paddy soil after rice harvest under long-term different fertilizations. J. Plant Nutr. Fertil. 2006, 12, 485–494. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, Z.; Yin, N.; Shang, D.; Liu, C.; Wu, Z.; Hu, Z.; Li, Q.; Chen, S. Effects of gradual increase of atmospheric C02 concentration on soil respiration of winter wheat field. Nanjing Xinxi Gongcheng Daxue Xuebao 2023, 15, 758–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Ren, T.; Cong, W.F.; Fang, Y.; Zhu, J.; Zhao, J.; Cong, R.; Li, X.; Lu, J. Oilseed rape-rice rotation with recommended fertilization and straw returning enhances soil organic carbon sequestration through influencing macroaggregates and molecular complexity. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2024, 367, 108960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, C.; Liu, X.; Li, C.K.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, G.; Su, Q.; Tian, Y. Spatiotemporal dynamics of carbon emissions by energy consumption in China from 1995 to 2014. Prog. Geogr. 2016, 35, 747–757. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Q.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Lu, Y. Spatial distribution pattern of population and characteristics of its evolution in China during 1935–2010. Geogr. Res. 2016, 35, 1547–1560. [Google Scholar]
- Rey, S.J.; Janikas, M.V. STARS: Space-time analysis of regional systems. In Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 91–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, S.Y.; Xi, F.M.; Yin, Y.; Bing, L.F.; Wang, J.Y.; Ma, M.J.; Zhang, W.F. Accounting and drivers of carbon emission from cultivated land utilization in Northeast China. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao J. Appl. Ecol. 2021, 32, 3865–3871. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, H.; Mu, X.M.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, M.Q. Effects of different land use patterns on carbon emission in Guangyuan city of Sichuan province. Bull. Soil Water Conserv. 2012, 32, 101–106. [Google Scholar]
- Duan, X.; Wang, X.; Lu, F.; Ouyang, Z.Y. Carbon sequestration and its potential by wetland ecosystems in China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2008, 28, 463–469. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, J.; Yu, X.; Zhou, L. Carbon emission efficiency growth of land use structure and its spatial correlation: A case study of Nanjing city. Geogr. Res. 2018, 37, 2177–2192. [Google Scholar]
- Jelinski, D.E.; Wu, J. The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landsc. Ecol. 1996, 11, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuson, M.; Yap, M.; Kok, M.R.; Murray, K.; Turlach, B.; Whyatt, D. Incorporating geography into a new generalized theoretical and statistical framework addressing the modifiable areal unit problem. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2019, 18, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Crop Name | Carbon Absorption Rate | Economic Coefficient | Moisture Content | Root-to-Shoot Ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|
paddy | 0.414 | 0.45 | 0.120 | 0.600 |
corn | 0.471 | 0.400 | 0.130 | 0.156 |
wheat | 0.485 | 0.400 | 0.120 | 0.393 |
soybean | 0.450 | 0.350 | 0.130 | 0.129 |
potatoes | 0.423 | 0.700 | 0.700 | 0.175 |
vegetables | 0.450 | 0.650 | 0.900 | - |
peanut | 0.450 | 0.430 | 0.100 | 0.720 |
rapeseed | 0.450 | 0.250 | 0.100 | 0.040 |
cotton | 0.450 | 0.2767 | 0.115 | 0.122 |
tobacco | 0.45 | 0.525 | 0.15 | 0.3175 |
Farmland Inputs | Carbon Emission Coefficient | Reference |
---|---|---|
farmland tillage | 3.126 kgCO2/hm2 | College of Biology and Technology, China Agricultural University |
fertilizer | 0.8956 kgCO2/kg | Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA |
agricultural film | 5.18 kgCO2/hm2 | Institute of Agricultural Resources and Ecological Environment, Nanjing Agricultural University |
agricultural diesel | 0.5927 kgCO2/kg | IPCC 2006 [27] |
pesticide | 4.9341 kgCO2/kg | Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA |
agricultural irrigation | 25 kgCO2/hm2 | Dubey [30] |
crop residues | 1.247 tCO2/t | Gehua Wang [31] |
Crop Name | Residue-to-Product Ratio | Carbon Emission Coefficient | Combustion Efficiency |
---|---|---|---|
paddy | 0.98 | 1.11 | 0.93 |
wheat | 1.38 | 1.47 | 0.92 |
corn | 0.96 | 1.35 | 0.92 |
soybean | 1.52 | 1.58 | 0.68 |
potatoes | 0.52 | 1.58 | 0.68 |
cotton | 3.35 | 1.35 | 0.8 |
rapeseed | 2.98 | 1.58 | 0.8 |
peanut | 1.26 | 1.58 | 0.82 |
vegetables | 1.00 | 1.58 | - |
Year | Long Axis/km | Minor Axis/km | Azimuth Angle/◦ | Coordinates of Gravity Center | Shift of Gravity Center | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Longitude | Latitude | Direction | Distance/km | ||||
2005 | 186.26 | 149.32 | 7.04 | 112°14′11″ | 27°40′1″ | - | - |
2006 | 185.12 | 145.9 | 6.83 | 112°13′13″ | 27°46′1″ | Northwest | 4.57 |
2007 | 187.92 | 153.2 | 6.96 | 112°13′38″ | 27°46′52″ | Southwest | 1.08 |
2008 | 185.47 | 151.73 | 11.92 | 112°8′5″ | 27°48′29″ | Northwest | 8.66 |
2009 | 186.83 | 152.44 | 3.09 | 112°4′25″ | 27°50′41″ | Northwest | 6.83 |
2010 | 191.59 | 153.21 | 7.20 | 112°4′31″ | 27°50′38″ | Southwest | 1.66 |
2011 | 188.71 | 149.46 | 6.42 | 112°3′48″ | 27°51′49″ | Northwest | 1.58 |
2012 | 190.69 | 148.71 | 6.54 | 112°1′12″ | 27°51′33″ | Southwest | 2.97 |
2013 | 189.62 | 148.09 | 5.45 | 112°1′17″ | 27°51′10″ | Northeast | 0.46 |
2014 | 190.25 | 148.10 | 4.55 | 112°3′39″ | 27°51′12″ | Northeast | 2.55 |
2015 | 190.71 | 147.00 | 3.69 | 112°4′50″ | 27°52′6″ | Northeast | 2.28 |
2016 | 187.70 | 146.88 | 4.17 | 112°4′16″ | 27°52′25″ | Northeast | 0.81 |
2017 | 191.09 | 157.01 | 6.34 | 112°0.2′13″ | 27°49′44″ | Southwest | 7.92 |
2018 | 195.27 | 156.96 | 8.41 | 111°58′15″ | 27°50′15″ | Northwest | 3.79 |
2019 | 197.78 | 156.08 | 11.57 | 111°59′41″ | 27°54′31″ | Northeast | 2.4 |
2020 | 201.36 | 162.87 | 18.90 | 111°58′34″ | 27°52′5″ | Southwest | 2.29 |
t/t + 1 | HH | LH | LL | HL | Type | Percent | n |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HH | I (0.87) | II (0.09) | IV (0.02) | III (0.02) | I | 0.83 | 302 |
LH | II (0.16) | I (0.74) | III (0.10) | IV (0.00) | II | 0.09 | 33 |
LL | IV (0.03) | III (0.06) | I (0.88) | II (0.04) | III | 0.07 | 25 |
HL | III (0.26) | IV (0.00) | II (0.13) | I (0.61) | IV | 0.02 | 6 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gu, H.; Chen, Y.; Ding, J.; Xin, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, L. Spatiotemporal Dynamic Evolution Characteristics of Net Carbon Sinks in County-Level Farmland Ecosystems in Hunan Province, China. Atmosphere 2025, 16, 1111. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16091111
Gu H, Chen Y, Ding J, Xin H, Liu Y, Li L. Spatiotemporal Dynamic Evolution Characteristics of Net Carbon Sinks in County-Level Farmland Ecosystems in Hunan Province, China. Atmosphere. 2025; 16(9):1111. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16091111
Chicago/Turabian StyleGu, Huangling, Yuqi Chen, Jiaoruo Ding, Haoyang Xin, Yan Liu, and Lin Li. 2025. "Spatiotemporal Dynamic Evolution Characteristics of Net Carbon Sinks in County-Level Farmland Ecosystems in Hunan Province, China" Atmosphere 16, no. 9: 1111. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16091111
APA StyleGu, H., Chen, Y., Ding, J., Xin, H., Liu, Y., & Li, L. (2025). Spatiotemporal Dynamic Evolution Characteristics of Net Carbon Sinks in County-Level Farmland Ecosystems in Hunan Province, China. Atmosphere, 16(9), 1111. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16091111