Next Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Potential Evapotranspiration Estimation Using Limited Data at a High-Altitude Mediterranean Forest
Previous Article in Journal
SD-WACCM-X Study of Nonmigrating Tidal Responses to the 2019 Antarctic Minor SSW
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Identifying the Combined Impacts of Sensor Quantity and Location Distribution on Source Inversion Optimization

1
Resources and Environment Innovation Institute, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China
2
Key Laboratory of Beijing on Regional Air Pollution Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
3
Beijing Laboratory for Intelligent Environmental Protection, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
4
Key Laboratory of Land and Sea Ecological Governance and Systematic Regulation, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Shandong Academy for Environmental Planning, Jinan 250101, China
5
Beijing Municipal Ecology and Environment Bureau, Beijing 101117, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2025, 16(7), 850; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16070850 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 30 May 2025 / Revised: 28 June 2025 / Accepted: 9 July 2025 / Published: 12 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Air Pollution Control)

Abstract

Source inversion optimization using sensor observations is a key method for rapidly and accurately identifying unknown source parameters (source strength and location) in abrupt hazardous gas leaks. Sensor number and location distribution both play important roles in source inversion; however, their combined impacts on source inversion optimization remain poorly understood. In our study, the optimization inversion method is established based on the Gaussian plume model and the generation algorithm. A research strategy combining random sampling and coefficient of variation methods was proposed to simultaneously quantify their combined impacts in the case of a single emission source. The sensor layout impact difference was analyzed under varying atmospheric conditions (unstable, neutral, and stable) and source location information (known or unknown) using the Prairie Grass experiments. The results indicated that adding sensors improved the source strength estimation accuracy more when the source location was known than when it was unknown. The impacts of sensor location distribution were strongly negatively correlated (r ≤ −0.985) with the number of sensors across scenarios. For source strength estimation, the impacts of the sensor location distribution difference decreased non-linearly with more sensors for known locations but linearly for unknown ones. The impacts of sensor number and location distribution on source strength estimation were amplified under stable atmospheric conditions compared to unstable and neutral conditions. The minimum number of randomly scattered sensors required for stable source strength inversion accuracy was 11, 12, and 17 for known locations under unstable, neutral, and stable atmospheric conditions, respectively, and 24, 9, and 21 for unknown locations. The multi-layer arc distribution outperformed rectangular, single-layer arc, and downwind-axis distributions in source strength estimation. This study enhances the understanding of factors influencing source inversion optimization and provides valuable insights for optimizing sensor layouts.
Keywords: source term estimation; optimization inversion; sensor layout; atmospheric dispersion; emergency response; abrupt air pollution accidents source term estimation; optimization inversion; sensor layout; atmospheric dispersion; emergency response; abrupt air pollution accidents

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mao, S.; Lang, J.; Hu, F.; Wang, X.; Wang, K.; Zhang, G.; Chen, F.; Chen, T.; Cheng, S. Identifying the Combined Impacts of Sensor Quantity and Location Distribution on Source Inversion Optimization. Atmosphere 2025, 16, 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16070850

AMA Style

Mao S, Lang J, Hu F, Wang X, Wang K, Zhang G, Chen F, Chen T, Cheng S. Identifying the Combined Impacts of Sensor Quantity and Location Distribution on Source Inversion Optimization. Atmosphere. 2025; 16(7):850. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16070850

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mao, Shushuai, Jianlei Lang, Feng Hu, Xiaoqi Wang, Kai Wang, Guiqin Zhang, Feiyong Chen, Tian Chen, and Shuiyuan Cheng. 2025. "Identifying the Combined Impacts of Sensor Quantity and Location Distribution on Source Inversion Optimization" Atmosphere 16, no. 7: 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16070850

APA Style

Mao, S., Lang, J., Hu, F., Wang, X., Wang, K., Zhang, G., Chen, F., Chen, T., & Cheng, S. (2025). Identifying the Combined Impacts of Sensor Quantity and Location Distribution on Source Inversion Optimization. Atmosphere, 16(7), 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16070850

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop