Next Article in Journal
Integrating Traffic Dynamics and Emissions Modeling: From Classical Approaches to Data-Driven Futures
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of the South Asian High and Western Pacific Subtropical High Pressure Systems on the Risk of Heat Stroke in Japan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Feature Extraction and Attribute Recognition of Aerosol Particles from In Situ Light-Scattering Measurements Based on EMD-ICA Combined LSTM Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Filtration of Mineral and Biological Aerosols by Natural Plant Panels

by
Nathalie Tomson
1,2,
Ruby Naomi Michael
1,2 and
Igor E. Agranovski
1,*
1
School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia
2
Green Infrastructure Research Labs (GIRLS), School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2025, 16(6), 694; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16060694
Submission received: 3 April 2025 / Revised: 21 May 2025 / Accepted: 5 June 2025 / Published: 9 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Characteristics and Control of Particulate Matter)

Abstract

:
This study investigated the potential of Tillandsia plants, which can be arranged as a soil-free living green panel, and Banksia flower spikes, which could be arranged as a non-living natural panel, to filter particulate matter (PM) and airborne microorganisms. The Tillandsia panels demonstrated superior PM filtration, achieving up to 74% efficiency for large particles (>10 μm) at air velocities of 1.0 and 1.5 m/s without increasing pressure drop substantially. Conversely, Banksia performed better at 0.5 m/s, filtering up to 53% of PM compared to Tillandsia’s 13%. Notably, both panel types demonstrated significant fungal filtration, removing over 50% of airborne spores at 1.5 m/s. These findings suggest that incorporating plant-based panels into urban environments can enhance air quality and public health especially for allergenic particles and microorganisms.

1. Introduction

Green infrastructure (GI) solutions, such as green walls and living roofs, can not only enhance the aesthetic appeal of cities but also provide numerous ecological benefits, including reduced urban temperatures and consequent energy demand for cooling buildings, reduced stormwater runoff, and increased biodiversity [1,2]. Moreover, these green spaces can contribute to the mental and physical well-being of urban residents, thus improving community health and quality of life [3].
Airborne microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi, pose significant threats to public health by causing respiratory infections and allergies [4]. Urban environments, in particular, are susceptible to increased levels of these microorganisms due to factors such as pollution, overcrowding, and inadequate ventilation in indoor spaces [5]. While traditional air filtration systems are effective, they often rely on energy-intensive technologies and may not be suitable for all settings.
Phytoremediation, the use of plants to remove pollutants from the environment, has been studied extensively for its efficacy in mitigating various forms of pollution, including air pollution [6]. Plants, with their diverse morphological and physiological characteristics, have emerged as potential candidates for natural air filters [7,8,9,10,11]. The ability of plants to remove pollutants from indoor environments, especially volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulate matter (PM), has been studied, yielding promising results [12,13,14,15,16]. The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic triggered interest in investigating the ability of plants to filter pathogens such as viruses and bacteria [17]. However, their potential to filter airborne microorganisms remains relatively unexplored.
This research investigates the use of two plant typologies, Banksia flower spikes and Tillandsia plants, in improving indoor and outdoor/indoor air quality when arranged as natural filtering panels. The complex structure and large surface area of Banksia flower spikes suggest their efficacy as physical traps for airborne microorganisms, a function potentially enhanced by the antimicrobial compounds produced by some Banksia species [18]. Tillandsia plants, being soil-free epiphytes, present a distinct advantage for urban and interior integration. Their ability to absorb atmospheric nutrients and water may also play a role in capturing and retaining airborne microorganisms. Furthermore, the successful use of Tillandsia panels as GI in Melbourne, Australia, where they reflected up to 90% of light and significantly cooled a building [19], highlights their broader environmental benefits.
Such natural, plant-based panels could be used as vertical greenery systems, more specifically green walls, where their complex geometries could be used to filter air pollutants. Different to green façades, that have plant roots on the ground (climbers) or roof (cascading plants), green walls are self-sufficient systems attached to the exterior or interior of a building [20]. The plant panels investigated in this study could be strategically installed along busy urban roads or street canyons, where they could act as biofilters, intercepting PM and gaseous pollutants generated by vehicular traffic [21,22]. Their organic aesthetic could also offer a softer, greener façade alternative or addition to conventional noise barriers [23] or outdoor plantation shutters to filter sunlight into houses. The panels could also be integrated into building ventilation systems as pre-filters, potentially reducing the load on mechanical filters and improving the quality of incoming air. Moreover, their lightweight and soilless nature makes them ideal for interior green walls in office spaces or residential buildings, where they could contribute to improved indoor air quality. Research has shown that interior green walls can significantly reduce levels of VOCs and PM in indoor environments [16]. The versatility of these plant-based panels, as highlighted by this range of potential applications that range from roadside barriers to interior design elements, highlights their potential to contribute to creating healthier and more sustainable urban spaces.
By employing a controlled laboratory experiment, this study aimed to quantify the filtration efficiency of the selected plant species for particles and airborne microorganisms, namely fungi, representing a wider range of allergy-causing airborne pathogens. Understanding the filtration mechanisms and potential of these plants can inform the design of green infrastructure solutions to improve air quality and public health in urban areas and enclosed spaces.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Laboratory Setup and Experiment Methodology

The experimental setup, shown in Figure 1, was designed to assess the efficacy of plants arranged as plant panels in removing various aerosols. Airflow, generated by a suction centrifugal fan (1) and measured by a flowmeter (2) (Model: HP-866B/APP, Zhuhai JiDa Huapu Instrument Co., Zhuhai, China), carried aerosols into the sealed chamber (4) containing a plant holder section (3) to act as a natural filter. The cross-sectional area of the plant panel was 126 cm2 and the thickness of the plant holder was 5 cm. Mineral aerosols were produced through atomization of a 5% NaCl solution by a nebulizer (5), further explained in Section 2.3. Mineral aerosol concentration and particle size distribution were monitored every 2 s using a laser particle counter (7) (Model 4705, AeroNanoTech, Moscow, Russia) used in previous research projects [10,11,24]. Biological aerosols (fungi) were produced via agar surface vibration (6), also further explained in Section 2.3, and samples were collected by bioaerosol impactors (8) onto the surface of the agar plates for subsequent incubation and colony counting.
A minimum of eight experimental runs (replicates) were performed for each plant species with different plant individuals to assess repeatability. The amount of plant material selected for each run was comparable, aiming for the same biomass weight of 123 g with an allowed variability of 10% due to biomass weight fluctuations from moisture content natural variations. Each experimental run involved operating the system for 2 min at each of the three selected velocities (0.5 m/s, 1.0 m/s, and 1.5 m/s) for the mineral aerosol experiments, and at 1.5 m/s velocity for the biological aerosol runs. These velocities were selected to represent the lower end of usual wind speeds experienced at ground level inside street canyons that—roughly—range between 0.5 m/s and 3 m/s on a typical day [25]. Aerosols were monitored and sampled from both inlet and outlet sampling points, i.e., before and after passing through the plant panel. The filtration efficiency of each run was calculated by:
E ( % ) = 1 C o u t C i n × 100 %
where Cin and Cout represent the fractional aerosol concentration at the inlet and outlet, respectively [26]. The filtration efficiency of the system was determined by averaging the results of at least eight replicate runs. To account for aerosol settling and deposition on the chamber walls, control measurements were performed with an empty chamber, revealing a deposition rate of less than 5% across all particles which was deemed acceptable and therefore not used for the correction of the results.
Pressure drop was measured at the beginning of each run and used to derive the quality factor (QF) of the system, which is calculated as follows:
QF = −ln(1 − E)/Δp
where E denotes the collection efficiency and Δp is the pressure drop across the filtering material [27]. The filtration performance of fibrous filters is commonly assessed using the QF, as a higher QF offers better performance by achieving higher collection efficiency with a lower pressure drop.

2.2. Plant Selection

The plant species were selected based on three criteria: (1) their ability to be arranged as natural panels for indoor and outdoor/indoor (such as window covers) environments; (2) the durability of the panel system, including plant adaptation in the urban and indoor settings with potentially harsh environment (i.e., sun exposure and possible lack of it, rain, wind); (3) plants of small elongated anatomy (leaves, flowers) for more predictable filtration efficiencies in accordance with our previous study [11].
Banksia spinulosa (Figure 2A), commonly known as Candlestick Banksia, is a species of the Proteaceae family, widely distributed along the eastern coast of Australia and typically growing as a multi-stemmed shrub to a height of 1.5 m [28]. It is characterised by its distinctive cylindrical flower spikes (inflorescences) with individual tiny flowers. When fresh or dry, the Banksia flower spikes can be easily removed from the plant and attached side by side onto a mesh/wire structure to form a durable, non-living natural panel. The Banksia flower spikes used in this experiment were sourced from the Griffith University campus and Toohey Forest in Nathan, Queensland, Australia, to where they are indigenous and abundantly found [29]. Dried Banksia flowers can last for up to six years when stored away from direct sunlight, water, and humidity in dried flower arrangements [30]. It is estimated that the non-living panels would last at least six months in an outdoor environment subjected to the weather, and up to twelve months in indoor conditions subjected to water flushing and forced airflow, after which time the flower spikes will need to be replaced. Banksias generally have a long flowering period—e.g., B. spinulosa flowers from autumn through the winter to spring [31]—allowing high availability of flower spikes for replacement. It is important to note that Banksia cones develop through three distinct stages: bud, flower spike, and seed capsule [31]. For use on the proposed panel, the cone must be harvested specifically during its flower spike stage. Unlike living materials, the non-living nature of the Banksia flower spike panel eliminates any need for consideration regarding irrigation or sun exposure, despite eventually requiring replacement.
Tillandsia spp. are epiphytes from the Bromeliaceae family native to the Americas that are commonly known as air plants. Although they use their roots to attach themselves to branches and other plant surfaces for structural support, they are not parasitic [32]. Their unique adaptation involves absorbing all necessary nutrients and water directly from the atmosphere, a process facilitated by specialised cells called trichomes [32]. The fact that these plants do not need soil or substrate to grow is advantageous for their use as vertical green infrastructure panels offering a resilient living, soil-independent green system that requires minimum maintenance [33]. In fact, in an outdoor environment with optimum sun exposure—indirect sunlight, dappled shade, or morning sun, depending on the species [34]—and abundant rainfall, the panels would require no maintenance. This was showcased on the Eureka Tower Experiment, where an installation of Tillandsias on top of Melbourne’s Eureka Tower (295 m) withstood for over a year with no maintenance or auxiliary watering system, exposed to extreme winds, heat, cold and extended periods of drought, with its performance continuing beyond the initial reporting period [35]. When placed indoors, Tillandsias need enough watering, sufficient light, to be allowed to dry between waterings, and they benefit from liquid fertilisation [36]. The species Tillandsia paleacea used in this study (Figure 2B) was sourced from a grower on the Sunshine Coast, Australia [37].
While the above-mentioned species were used for the experiments, it is hypothesised that other species within the same genus exhibiting analogous morphological traits, e.g., Banksia robur, Banksia aemula, Tillandsia chiletensis, and Tillandsia streptocarpa, would yield comparable results. Therefore, to streamline terminology, the plants used in this study are hereafter simply referred to as ‘Banksia flower spikes’ and ‘Tillandsias’.
Within the prototype chamber, Banksia flower spikes were cut and placed adjacent to each other, while Tillandsias were arranged to match their natural outdoor growth density after one year of establishment hanging on an outdoor wall (as depicted in Figure 2). These plant arrangements in the prototype simulated their intended configuration on a full-scale plant-based panel designed for urban application.

2.3. Particle Selection and Generation/Cultivation

As previously mentioned in Section 2.1, the laboratory setup was built to measure aerosols with both mineral and biological particles.
To create an aerosol comprised with mineral particles, a 5% NaCl solution was processed through a 3-jet Collison nebulizer (BGI Inc., Waltman, MA, USA). This nebulization was powered by 6 L per minute of HEPA-filtered compressed air. The addition of approximately 2% v/v glycerol to the nebulizer was crucial in maintaining hydration of the salt aerosol particles, thereby ensuring the final particle size distribution contained particles with a diameter up to and inclusive of 10 μm. More detailed information on the particle size distribution is presented in our previously published research that used the same methodology [10]. These mineral particles were selected to represent general PM in air, which is a complex mixture of components. PM10 and PM2.5 are particles with a diameter of 10 μm or less and 2.5 μm or less, respectively. PM10 are inhalable into the lungs and associated with adverse health effects, while PM2.5 can travel deep into the lungs and enter the bloodstream, posing significant health risks [38,39].
Aspergillus niger is a species of the fungal genus Aspergillus, which is recognised as the most prevalent airborne fungal spore that is linked to the development of invasive life-threatening infection and hypersensitivity respiratory illness in humans [40]. A. niger is found widely in the environment, including soil, decaying vegetation, and indoor air. While generally considered safe, it can cause health issues in susceptible individuals [41]. For this study, A. niger was sourced from Southern Biological, Australia. A small portion of fungus was transferred into a tube containing 9 mL of sterile water. The tube was shaken and sonicated to disperse the spores evenly throughout the liquid, and 150 μL of this suspension was pipetted onto the surface of an agar plate in a 90 mm diameter plastic Petri dish. The suspension was then spread across the nutrient surface—malt extract agar (MEA)—medium (CM 59 Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK) to ensure uniform growth, and placed into an incubator set to 25 °C. A bowl of water was also placed in the incubator to maintain a relative humidity of 55–65%. All procedures and experiments were conducted within a Class II biological safety cabinet (Model BH 2000, Clyde-Apac, Brisbane, Australia) to prevent release of aerosols into the laboratory environment.
Fungal aerosols were then made airborne using our previously developed vibrating fungal spore generator that is capable of aerosolizing fungal spores directly from cultures grown in standard 9 cm Petri dishes [42]. The setup involved sealing a 10 cm diameter, 2-watt, 4-ohm speaker to the bottom of a cylindrical casing with a soft rubber gasket. A Petri dish containing mature fungal spores was placed directly on the speaker’s surface and secured with thin, flexible rubber strips. The speaker’s size was carefully selected to precisely fit a standard 9 cm Petri dish, ensuring that the dish vibrated in sync with the speaker’s membrane at different frequencies during the experiment. A Hewlett-Packard 3312A Function Generator controlled the amplitude and frequency of the speaker’s vibrations to optimise particle concentration. A fresh Petri dish with fungal culture was used for each experiment. At the air flow rate of 15 lpm through the generator, the device is capable of generating up to 1000 Colony-Forming Units (CFU) per litre of the air carrier.

3. Results and Discussion

The results obtained for the aerosol filtration efficiency of the panels, calculated by Equation (1), are shown in Figure 3. None of the systems performed well at filtering particles of 2.5 μm diameter or less (i.e., PM2.5); Tillandsia panels subjected to the highest air velocity (1.5 m/s) was the only configuration providing filtration efficiency of around 10% for these particle sizes. Nevertheless, particles larger than 2.5 μm were filtered with at least 10% efficiency by all systems except Tillandsia at lowest air velocity. Efficiencies for particles larger than 5 μm ranged from 31% to 71% for Banksia flower spike panels and 6% to 74% for Tillandsia panels. This pattern aligns with the general expectations derived from filtration theory. As particle size increases, the inertial mechanism of aerosol removal becomes more effective. Additionally, since inertial impaction is the dominant mechanism for capturing large particles, increasing the air velocity further enhances this process, which leads to an increase in overall particle collection efficiency. This interaction between particle size, air velocity, and filtration mechanisms is consistent with the theoretical understanding of filtration systems and their performance across different particle sizes.
An important parament of the air filtration processes is the pressure drop across the filtration media at the operational gas flowrates. Figure 4 shows the pressure drop recorded for both plant systems involved in this investigation. Tillandsia panels provided considerably lower pressure drop compared with the Banksia flower spike panels; even for the highest operational air velocity of 1.5 m/s, the pressure drop across the Tillandsia panels did not exceed 20 Pa. A higher but also acceptable pressure drop of around 70 Pa was observed for the Banksia flower spike panels operated at the highest flowrate. With the abovementioned similar aerosol removal efficiency results provided by the two species, Tillandsia panels seem to be more advantageous for having lower pressure drop at a comparable filtering efficiency.
The benefits of using Tillandsia are further highlighted in Figure 5, which illustrates the QF values calculated by Equation (2) for both panel types across the entire range of air velocities. The results were determined based on the average values of the particle size intervals, and these values are displayed on the x-axis of Figure 5. The QF for the Tillandsia panel reaches values between 0.04 and 0.06 Pa−1 for larger particle sizes and the highest air velocities, which is comparable to the performance of moderately efficient fibrous filters (as seen in Figure 9 of [27]). Additionally, it is important to note that, due to the very low hydrodynamic resistance of the Tillandsia panel, its thickness could be increased—potentially doubled or even tripled—without a significant rise in pressure drop (only up to 50–60 Pa). This adjustment would result in anexponential increase in efficiency while only causing a moderate increase in pressure drop.
For reference, a common polystyrene fibre filter of 1.5 mm thickness and 0.7 μm fibre diameter provides an average filtration efficiency of 99.5%, a pressure drop of 2900 Pa, and a filter quality 0.001 Pa−1 with an air velocity of 0.27 m/s [26].
The last set of experiments was focused on the capability of the panels to capture biological aerosols from the ambient air. As discussed above, A. niger spores were used in the experiments. As the highest velocities yielded the best performance in mineral aerosol tests with relatively low pressure drop, the air velocity of 1.5 m/s was chosen for biological aerosol (fungi) testing. Banksia flower spikes collected A. niger spores with 71% ± 14% average efficiency and low STDEV value, outperforming Tillandsias’ 57% ± 10% removal efficiency. Given that A. niger spores range from 3 to 5.4 µm [43], these measured filtration efficiencies were better than those measured for mineral aerosols of the same size, yet the results are still within a similar range. This outperformance could be associated with the more sophisticated shape of fungal spores captured particularly well by the more complex structure of the Banksia flower spikes particularly. According to a review of the literature by M. Tomson et al. [44], urban vegetation filters air primarily through two mechanisms: dispersion and deposition; these processes are enhanced by specific micromorphological leaf traits such as the presence of grooves, ridges, leaf hairs, a higher density of leaf pores, and a greater amount of epicuticular wax on the leaf surface.
The effective performance of the plant-based panels in filtering larger particles is a good indication that pollen can be collected at high efficiencies. Wind-borne pollen ranges from 10 to approximately 100 μm in diameter, with allergy-producing pollen often cited as being around 25 µm [45,46]. Consequently, these plant panels are expected to be promising collectors of allergenic particles and microorganisms, thereby enhancing air quality and public health. This aligns with the observations by H. Li et al. [47], who documented a significant inverse correlation between the extent of urban greenness and the relative abundance of pathogenic bacteria and fungi in the air.
Natural panel systems can potentially be designed for self-sufficient operation outdoors, by using ambient wind to achieve the predicted efficiencies and rainwater for flushing and renewing the filtration system. For indoor applications where there is less airflow and no ambient precipitation, a quiet, low-power axial fan achieving a 1.5 m/s airflow, together with an irrigation system, would be required to achieve the predicted filtration efficiencies.

4. Conclusions

Banksia flower spikes and Tillandsias were both found to be promising when arranged as plant-based panels to filter PM and fungi in the air. Tillandsia panels provided the best filter QF at air velocities of 1.0 m/s and 1.5 m/s, producing the highest PM filtration efficiencies (up to 74% for large particles) with low pressure drop. However, Banksia flower spike panels performed better at lower air velocity (0.5 m/s), with a filtration capacity of up to 53% compared with 13% for Tillandsia. Effective filtration of fungi (A. niger spores) was also observed, with both plant panels capturing over 50% of the airborne spores at the tested 1.5 m/s air velocity. Plant performance in filtering fungi is likely due to a combination of factors, including their physical structure and surface properties.
The filtration efficiencies found in this study suggest that incorporating plants into urban environments in the form of passive natural panels or living green walls can contribute to improved air quality and public health by reducing the concentration of airborne particles and fungi.
The efficiency of the panels in removing small particles was found to be low, which means they would not be effective at removing airborne bacteria or, even more so, viruses. However, the system demonstrated excellent performance in removing larger allergenic particles, such as fungi and pollen. Therefore, the plant panel systems may be a good natural solution for individuals suffering from allergic reactions.

Author Contributions

N.T.: Conceptualization; Investigation; Methodology; Formal analysis; Writing—original draft. R.N.M.: Formal analysis; Writing—review and editing. I.E.A.: Formal analysis; Investigation; Validation; Writing—review and editing; General supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available from the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Lloyd Godman, an ecological artist who introduced us to the world of Tillandsias and whose passion for these plants was inspiring. Sadly, Lloyd passed away during this research. We also thank Bruce Dunstan, whom Lloyd connected us with, for presenting his Tillandsia collection and for donating the Tillandsia plants used in this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chell, S.; Tomson, N.; Kim, T.D.H.; Michael, R.N. Performance of native succulents, forbs, and grasses on an extensive green roof over four years in subtropical Australia. Urban For. Urban Green. 2022, 74, 127631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kim, T.D.H.; Yu, B.; Srichandra, J.; Low-Choy, S.; Michael, R.N. Water flux and biomass production of native plants at different substrate compactions for landfill phytocaps in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Ecol. Eng. 2022, 183, 106745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nakamura, F. (Ed.) Green Infrastructure and Climate Change Adaptation: Function, Implementation and Governance; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Al-Shaarani, A.A.Q.A.; Pecoraro, L. A review of pathogenic airborne fungi and bacteria: Unveiling occurrence, sources, and profound human health implication. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1428415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhao, J.; Jin, L.; Wu, D.; Xie, J.; Li, J.; Fu, X.; Cong, Z.; Fu, P.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, X.; et al. Global airborne bacterial community—Interactions with Earth’s microbiomes and anthropogenic activities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2204465119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Duan, X.; Gu, H.; Lam, S.S.; Sonne, C.; Lu, W.; Li, H.; Chen, X.; Peng, W. Recent progress on phytoremediation of urban air pollution. Chemosphere 2024, 349, 140821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Paull, N.J.; Irga, P.J.; Torpy, F.R. Active botanical biofiltration of air pollutants using Australian native plants. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2019, 12, 1427–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Paull, N.J.; Krix, D.; Irga, P.J.; Torpy, F.R. Airborne particulate matter accumulation on common green wall plants. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2020, 22, 594–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peng, Z.; Deng, W.; Hong, Y.; Chen, Y. An experimental work to investigate the capabilities of plants to remove particulate matters in an enclosed greenhouse. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2020, 13, 477–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tomson, N.; Michael, R.N.; Agranovski, I.E. Removal of particulate air pollutants by Australian vegetation potentially used for green barriers. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2021, 12, 101070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tomson, N.; Michael, R.N.; Agranovski, I.E. Classic Theory of Aerosol Filtration for Application to Urban Green Infrastructure. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2025, 236, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gong, Y.; Zhou, T.; Wang, P.; Lin, Y.; Zheng, R.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, B. Fundamentals of Ornamental Plants in Removing Benzene in Indoor Air. Atmosphere 2019, 10, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, K.J.; Kil, M.J.; Song, J.S.; Yoo, E.H.; Son, K.-C.; Kays, S.J. Efficiency of Volatile Formaldehyde Removal by Indoor Plants: Contribution of Aerial Plant Parts versus the Root Zone. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2008, 133, 521–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, H.-H.; Yang, J.-Y.; Lee, J.-Y.; Park, J.-W.; Kim, K.-J.; Lim, B.-S.; Lee, G.-W.; Lee, S.-E.; Shin, D.-C.; Lim, Y.-W. House-plant placement for indoor air purification and health benefits on asthmatics. Environ. Health Toxicol. 2014, 29, e2014014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, J.; Chen, S.; Zhong, J.; Lin, S.; Pang, S.; Tu, Q.; Agranovski, I.E. Removal of formaldehyde from indoor air by potted Sansevieria trifasciata plants: Dynamic influence of physiological traits on the process. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 62983–62996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pettit, T.; Irga, P.J.; Torpy, F.R. The in situ pilot-scale phytoremediation of airborne VOCs and particulate matter with an active green wall. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2019, 12, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. El-Tanbouly, R.; Hassan, Z.; El-Messeiry, S. The Role of Indoor Plants in air Purification and Human Health in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Proposal for a Novel Line of Inquiry. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 709395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, J.; Netzel, M.E.; Pengelly, A.; Sivakumar, D.; Sultanbawa, Y. A Review of Phytochemicals and Bioactive Properties in the Proteaceae Family: A Promising Source of Functional Food. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Godman, L. East Melbourne Wall Garden; Lloyd Godman: Studio LAB Xeric. Available online: https://www.lloydgodman.net/suspend/Melbourne1.html (accessed on 31 March 2025).
  20. Radić, M.; Brković Dodig, M.; Auer, T. Green Facades and Living Walls—A Review Establishing the Classification of Construction Types and Mapping the Benefits. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kandelan, S.N.; Yeganeh, M.; Peyman, S.; Panchabikesan, K.; Eicker, U. Environmental study on greenery planning scenarios to improve the air quality in urban canyons. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 83, 103993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pugh, T.A.; Mackenzie, A.R.; Whyatt, J.D.; Hewitt, C.N. Effectiveness of green infrastructure for improvement of air quality in urban street canyons. Env. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 7692–7699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Oquendo-Di Cosola, V.; Olivieri, F.; Ruiz-García, L. A systematic review of the impact of green walls on urban comfort: Temperature reduction and noise attenuation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 162, 112463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Agranovski, I.E.; Usachev, E.V. In-situ rapid bioaerosol detection in the ambient air by miniature multiplex PCR utilizing technique. Atmos. Environ. 2021, 246, 118147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Santamouris, M.; Georgakis, C.; Niachou, A. On the estimation of wind speed in urban canyons for ventilation purposes—Part 2: Using of data driven techniques to calculate the more probable wind speed in urban canyons for low ambient wind speeds. Build. Environ. 2008, 43, 1411–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hinds, W.C. Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim, H.B.; Lee, W.J.; Choi, S.C.; Lee, K.B.; Lee, M.-H. Filter quality factors of fibrous filters with different fiber diameter. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 154–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. ANPSA. Banksia spinulosa. Australian Native Plants Society (Australia). 2025. Available online: https://anpsa.org.au/plant_profiles/banksia-spinulosa/ (accessed on 20 May 2025).
  29. Griffith Archive. Candlestick Banksia (Banksia spinulosa). Toohey Forest Flora Collection. 2002. Available online: https://griffitharchive.griffith.edu.au/nodes/view/859 (accessed on 20 May 2025).
  30. Milla Rose. The Banksia: Everything You Need to Know. 2022. Available online: https://millarose.com.au/blogs/flowers/banksia-the-ultimate-guide (accessed on 20 May 2025).
  31. ANBG. Information About Australia’s Flora: Growing Native Plants: Banksia spinulosa; Australian National Botanic Gardens and Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research: Canberra, Australia, 2015. Available online: https://www.anbg.gov.au/gnp/gnp7/banksia-spinulosa.html (accessed on 18 May 2025).
  32. Cornell Cooperative Extension. Air Plants (Tillandsia). Warren County Master Gardener Articles. 2021. Available online: http://warren.cce.cornell.edu/gardening-landscape/warren-county-master-gardener-articles/air-plants-tillandsia (accessed on 20 May 2025).
  33. Godman, L. Plants & Architecture: Critical Comparisons of Xeric and Hydric Plant Systems, 1st ed.; Photo-Synthesis Media; 2023; Available online: https://www.lloydgodman.net/Publications/Plants_and_architecture.html (accessed on 20 May 2025).
  34. Beck, A.; Duax, S. How to Grow Air Plants That Don’t Need Soil to Survive; Better Homes & Gardens: Des Moines, IA, USA, 2025; Available online: https://www.bhg.com/gardening/houseplants/care/grow-air-plants (accessed on 20 May 2025).
  35. Godman, L.; Jones, S.; Harris, G. A “Flight” Manual for Air Plants. CTBUH J. 2015. Available online: https://www.lloydgodman.net/Cv/Press/TBUH1.pdf (accessed on 20 May 2025).
  36. Sengo, Z. Air Plants: The Curious World of Tillandsias; Timber Press, Inc.: Portland, OR, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  37. ASA. Bruce Dunstan. Aroid Society of Australia. Available online: https://www.aroids.net/bruce-dunstan (accessed on 30 March 2025).
  38. ARB. Inhalable Particulate Matter and Health (PM2.5 and PM10)|California Air Resources Board. 2025. Available online: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/inhalable-particulate-matter-and-health?keywords=2025 (accessed on 20 May 2025).
  39. WHO. WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines: Particulate Matter (PM2. 5 and PM10), Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, Sulfur Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide, 1st ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
  40. Taussig, L.M.; Landau, L.; Le Souef, P.; Martinez, F.D.; Morgan, W.J.; Sly, P. Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, 2nd ed.; Mosby International: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  41. Health Canada. Aspergillus Niger Group—Information Sheet. In Pollinosis; Falagiani, P., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1989. Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/chemical-substances/fact-sheets/chemicals-glance/aspergillus-awamori-aspergillus-brasiliensis.html (accessed on 13 June 2014).
  42. Scheermeyer, E.; Agranovski, I.E. Design and evaluation of a new device for fungal spore aerosolization for laboratory applications. J. Aerosol Sci. 2009, 40, 879–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, X.; Zhang, T.; Wang, J.; Wang, S. Prediction of Aerosolized Fungal Spores by Determining Respiratory Intensity of the Growing Colony. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2020, 20, 776–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tomson, M.; Kumar, P.; Barwise, Y.; Perez, P.; Forehead, H.; French, K.; Morawska, L.; Watts, J.F. Green infrastructure for air quality improvement in street canyons. Env. Int. 2021, 146, 106288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Falagiani, P. Pollinosis; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  46. Knox, R.B. Pollen and Allergy; Edward Arnold: London, UK, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  47. Li, H.; Wu, Z.-F.; Yang, X.-R.; An, X.-L.; Ren, Y.; Su, J.-Q. Urban greenness and plant species are key factors in shaping air microbiomes and reducing airborne pathogens. Environ. Int. 2021, 153, 106539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental setup. Suction fan (1), flowmeter (2), plant holder (3), aerosol chamber (4), nebulizer for mineral aerosol production (5), fungal generator (6), particle counter (7), and bioaerosol impactors (8).
Figure 1. Experimental setup. Suction fan (1), flowmeter (2), plant holder (3), aerosol chamber (4), nebulizer for mineral aerosol production (5), fungal generator (6), particle counter (7), and bioaerosol impactors (8).
Atmosphere 16 00694 g001
Figure 2. From left to right: Banksia flower spikes (A) and Tillandsias (B) in their source environment, weighed before experiments and arranged as panels in the plant chamber.
Figure 2. From left to right: Banksia flower spikes (A) and Tillandsias (B) in their source environment, weighed before experiments and arranged as panels in the plant chamber.
Atmosphere 16 00694 g002
Figure 3. Efficiency of the aerosol removal by Tillandsia (left) and Banksia flower spike (right) panels.
Figure 3. Efficiency of the aerosol removal by Tillandsia (left) and Banksia flower spike (right) panels.
Atmosphere 16 00694 g003
Figure 4. Pressure drop across the filtration panels.
Figure 4. Pressure drop across the filtration panels.
Atmosphere 16 00694 g004
Figure 5. Filter (plant panel) quality factor.
Figure 5. Filter (plant panel) quality factor.
Atmosphere 16 00694 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tomson, N.; Michael, R.N.; Agranovski, I.E. Filtration of Mineral and Biological Aerosols by Natural Plant Panels. Atmosphere 2025, 16, 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16060694

AMA Style

Tomson N, Michael RN, Agranovski IE. Filtration of Mineral and Biological Aerosols by Natural Plant Panels. Atmosphere. 2025; 16(6):694. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16060694

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tomson, Nathalie, Ruby Naomi Michael, and Igor E. Agranovski. 2025. "Filtration of Mineral and Biological Aerosols by Natural Plant Panels" Atmosphere 16, no. 6: 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16060694

APA Style

Tomson, N., Michael, R. N., & Agranovski, I. E. (2025). Filtration of Mineral and Biological Aerosols by Natural Plant Panels. Atmosphere, 16(6), 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16060694

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop