Next Article in Journal
Estimation of Biomass Burning Emissions in South and Southeast Asia Based on FY-4A Satellite Observations
Previous Article in Journal
Pollution Assessment Using Soil and Plant Leaves in Faisalabad, Pakistan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Measuring Ammonia Concentration Distributions with Passive Samplers to Evaluate the Impact of Vehicle Exhaust on a Roadside Environment in Tokyo, Japan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Study on the Application of an Estimated Ammonia Emission Factor Reflecting the Operating Characteristics of Open Laying Hen Houses in Korea

1
Carbon Neutrality Research Center, The Seoul Institute, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Climate and Environment, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
3
Carbon Neutral Office, The Korea Chamber of Commerce & Industry (KCCI), Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2025, 16(5), 581; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050581
Submission received: 24 March 2025 / Revised: 28 April 2025 / Accepted: 9 May 2025 / Published: 12 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ammonia Emissions and Particulate Matter (2nd Edition))

Abstract

:
In Korea, winch curtains are used when operating open-type barns. The winch curtain method is a method of opening the curtain by taking into account the temperature, which has the characteristics of an open-type barn when used but can have the discharge characteristics of a closed-type barn when operated in an enclosed manner. In this study, the related methodologies were reviewed and measured to examine and reflect the characteristics of curtain opening in open sheds. The results of NH3 concentration measurements showed that the average daily concentration was 5.60 ppm when operating in an enclosed state, 0.20 ppm when operating in an open state, and 0.70 ppm when operating intermittently. It was found that the operating concentration in a closed state is relatively higher than that in an open and intermittent state. Therefore, it was examined whether the characteristics of open barns differ depending on the type of operation and whether this should be taken into account when developing emission factors. The NH3 emission factor developed in consideration of these characteristics was 0.33 kg NH3/year/animal housing area (AP), which was similar to the emission factor developed overseas.

1. Introduction

In 2013, the World Health Organization (WHO) classified particulate matter (PM) as a Group 1 carcinogen. The PM2.5 concentration in Republic of Korea increased by approximately 5% in 2023 compared to that in 2022 [1]. Ultrafine particle concentration in Republic of Korea was >5 μg/m3 in 2022, which exceeded the WHO standard for annual concentration of ultrafine particles. Moreover, only five cities in Republic of Korea exhibited an annual average concentration of 19.7 μg/m3 or less, which is the regulation standard for ultrafine particle concentration in Republic of Korea. This indicates that ultrafine particles still require increased management [2,3].
PM 2.5 can be divided into direct and indirect emissions based on their origin from emission sources and secondary sources through chemical reactions, respectively. Indirect emissions account for approximately 72% of total ultrafine particle emissions, thus highlighting the need for their increased management [4]. The secondary products of ultrafine particles include nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), volatile organic compounds, and NH3. Among these, NOx and SOx have been studied extensively and consequently effectively managed; however, similar research on NH3 and its management is relatively lackluster [5,6,7].
In 2022, NH3 emissions in Republic of Korea were 315,975 tons, of which the agricultural sector accounted for 84%. Moreover, 92% of these NH3 emissions from the agricultural sector were from the manure management sector [8]. In the case of manure management, NH3 emission factors developed in Republic of Korea are used to calculate emissions for cattle and pigs, and emission factors from the European Environment Agency and US Environmental Protection Agency are used for the rest of the items [9,10,11]. Therefore, developing an emission factor that reflects the overall NH3 emission characteristics of Republic of Korea is necessary. NH3 emitted from manure management mainly comes from livestock houses. As of 2020, the number of open livestock houses in Republic of Korea was approximately seven times more than that of closed livestock houses [12], thus indicating the need to consider the characteristics of NH3 emissions from open livestock housing while calculating the NH3 emission factor of the corresponding manure management sector.
In Republic of Korea, NH3 emissions from open livestock housing have been mainly measured using the chamber method [13]. Moreover, the NH3 emission factor for cattle and pigs was developed using this method. However, in the case of this method, it is difficult to consider the actual ventilation amount in the open house, and it has disadvantages in that it is not possible to monitor ammonia emissions in real time. In addition, there is difficulty in measuring the actual livestock while they are in the barn, taking into account the breeding environment and measuring them inside [14].
In addition to the method of using a classical chamber, which is mainly used in Republic of Korea, there is the method of using a tracer gas to calculate the flow rate and then calculate the emission based on this. The tracer gas method is widely used for various purposes, but it is also used to calculate emissions from livestock activity and manure management or to develop the related coefficients. A lot of research has been conducted on what tracer gas should be used and the impact of this [15,16,17,18]. In particular, the Verification of Environmental Technologies for Agricultural Production (VERA), a multinational cooperation organization created to test and verify environmental technologies in the agricultural sector, also introduced the tracer gas method as a methodology for measuring ammonia in open-air barns and presented a protocol for relevant measurement conditions.
Since open-type livestock houses breed livestock in an open environment, it is difficult to calculate the flow rate, unlike in a closed-type barn with ventilation holes or an industrial facility with an outlet, so it is difficult to calculate the level of emissions. In the case of the tracer gas method, it can be used to calculate the emission of air pollutants in an open barn because the ventilation rate can be calculated using the difference in concentration between the inside and outside the hen house by theoretically calculating or injecting the tracer gas [19]. In addition, it is important to cooperate with farmers to conduct measurements. The tracer gas method allows measurements to be taken without entering the barn, so we chose this method because it can more easily facilitate cooperation with farmers.
In Republic of Korea, when raising livestock in an open barn, winch curtains are used together to control the breeding environment. In particular, when a winch curtain is used, the environment inside the barn may have a closed type of characteristic, so it is necessary to consider this when developing a representative NH3 emission factor.
Therefore, in this study, the NH3 emission factor is calculated for open laying hen houses, using the tracer gas method of the VERA test protocol, and based on these data, we will consider a method that can reflect the characteristics of the winch curtain opening and closing.

2. Methods

2.1. Selection of a Laying Hen House

The target facilities were selected to be sufficiently compliant with the protocol criteria, taking into account the measurement criteria proposed by the VERA test protocol, which are used to calculate the NH3 emission factor of an open-range laying hen house using the tracer gas method [19].
The breeding environment of the laying hen house is described in Table 1. A target facility that raised 4000 laying hens, each weighing 1.8 kg or more and used for more than two months, was selected. These conditions fulfilled the criteria of the VERA test protocol of a minimum of 750 animals and a livestock housing use period of two months before actual measurement.

2.2. Measurement of NH3 and CO2 Concentrations

The concentration of NH3 and CO2 was measured three times on site in Republic of Korea. The measurement period was from 2020 to 2021, with measurements taken in October 2020 and June and July 2021. Data were collected for three days during each measurement. The concentration measurement results were then used to calculate the NH3 emission factor.
The VERA test protocol proposes the use of CO2 or SF6, which are relatively stable gases unaffected by ambient conditions, as tracer gases in open-range barn facilities.
The method of calculating the flow rate using CO2 is calculated by considering the theoretical emissions generated from the animal’s metabolism, such as heat and respiration, without direct gas injection.
In the case of SF6, the flow rate is calculated by injecting this gas directly and using it as a tracer gas of this concentration. The actual gas must be injected into the barn, so the relevant settings must be carried out by actually entering the barn, which is difficult to obtain consent form the relevant farm owners. This is because farm owners are very concerned about the stress levels of the livestock. So, CO2 was selected as the tracer gas because it has relatively few restrictions.
Furthermore, internal and external CO2 concentrations were measured by installing a Non-Dispersive Infrared Instrument (NDIR, TSI-7525, TSI Inc., Shoreview, MN, USA), whereas internal and external NH3 concentrations were measured using Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy (CRDS, G2103, Picarro Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The internal NH3 concentration was measured at five points at 2 m intervals using a multi-sampler while considering the main wind direction; meanwhile, the external concentration was measured at a point farther than 5 m, as per the recommendations by the VERA test protocol to reduce internal influence.
The poultry house measures 45 m × 6 m × 3.5 m (length × width × height) and operates with a natural ventilation system. It is equipped with winch curtains that the farm owner adjusts based on extensive experience to maintain appropriate temperatures. Due to seasonal factors, the curtains remain fully open during summer months, completely closed during winter, and are opened and closed intermittently during spring and autumn. The laying hens are raised in three-tiered cage systems (Figure 1).

2.3. Estimation of the NH3 Emission Factor

The tracer gas method is used for calculating ventilation rates based on the difference between the internal and external concentrations of the target gas and the tracer gas, and it is the basis for calculating the amount of air pollutants emitted from livestock buildings. The VERA Test Protocol presents a formula for calculating ventilation rates (flow rate) by taking into account the CO2 concentration inside the chamber when using CO2 as a tracer gas. In the case of CO2 concentration, both theoretical and actual values are considered. Among them, the CO2 theoretically generated is calculated by considering the respiration and heat generation of animals, and the value and actual measurement are calculated by considering the CO2 concentration inside and outside the hen house. In particular, reference books related to the calculation of heat generation units (HPUs) that take into account animal respiration and heat generation are also presented.
First, the ventilation rate of the livestock house was calculated using the theoretical CO2 concentration based on the heat emissions and respiration of animals. Accordingly, the laying hens’ HPU was determined, because it considers the CO2 emissions from the metabolic processes of animals and represents the amount of heat production; thus, it can be used to calculate CO2 emissions generated per heat production process. The HPU and ventilation rate were calculated using the formula suggested by the International Commission of Agricultural Engineering, as given in Equations (1) and (2), respectively [20].
The HPU (unit: W) is the total daily heat production per kg of laying hens in the laying hen house. The HPU of the laying hens was calculated using Equation (1) as follows:
H P U = N × 6.28 × m 0.75 + 25 × Y 2
N is total number of chickens in the laying hen house, m 0.75 is weight of laying hens (kg), and Y 2 is egg production per day (kg/day).
Subsequently, the ventilation rate considering the HPU was calculated using Equation (2).
V R = 0.185 × H P U C O 2 i n s i d e C O 2 o u t s i d e × 10 6
where VR is the Ventilation Rate (m3/h); C O 2 i n s i d e is the CO2 concentration inside the hen house (ppm); C O 2 o u t s i d e is CO2 concentration outside the hen house (ppm); and 0.185 is the convert coefficient (m3/h HPU)
According to the CIGR, the CO2 volume generated using Equation (2) is 0.185 m3/h per HPU, which is based on the results of several experiments. The HPU and ventilation rate were calculated after sufficient theoretical verification for each livestock species. Notably, the related constants were presented only as coefficients.
Finally, the NH3 emission factor was calculated on a yearly basis according to the standards of previous studies using Equation (3). Since VR is expressed in units of flow per hour, the emission factor was calculated by considering 24 h and 365 days in order to create an emission factor in units of years.
N H 3 E F = V R × N H 3 i n s i d e N H 3 o u t s i d e × M w A × V m × 24 × 365 × 10 6
where A is the breeding head or allowable number of heads per area (AP); Vm is the Volume (integer) in the standard state of 1 mole of ideal gas = 24.45 (10−3 m3/mol); NH3(inside) is NH3 concentration inside in the hen house (ppm); NH3(outside) is NH3 concentration outside the hen house (ppm); and MW is the molecular weight of NH3 (17.031 g/mol). This study used an appropriate livestock breeding criterion of 0.075 m2/head per unit area of livestock breeding facilities for laying hens, as stipulated in the Enforcement Decree of the Livestock Industry Act of Republic of Korea.

3. Results

3.1. NH3 Concentration in the Open Laying Hen House

Table 2 shows the measured NH3 concentrations. The first measurement was taken in October, when the weather was cool and the winch curtains were closed. The average indoor concentration at this time was 5.6 ppm, with a maximum of 9.59 ppm and a minimum of 3.22 ppm, indicating a relatively high concentration. The second measurement period was in June, when the weather was hot, so the system was operated with the winch curtains open. The average indoor concentration during this period was 0.20 ppm, with a maximum of 0.33 ppm and a minimum of 0.10 ppm. Finally, the third measurement period was during the hot summer period, though there were also periods of rain, resulting in relatively lower temperatures. During this period, the winch curtains were closed when it rained and opened when it did not rain. During the measurement period, the facility was operated with the winch curtains were open for approximately 16 h. At this time, the average internal concentration was 0.70 ppm, with a maximum of 1.72 ppm and a minimum of 0.27 ppm. The overall average NH3 concentration inside during the measurement period was 2.36 ppm, with a maximum of 9.59 ppm and a minimum of 0.10 ppm.
External concentrations also showed variations depending on the operational conditions, with an overall average of 0.38 ppm, a maximum of 0.62 ppm, and a minimum of 0.08 ppm.

3.2. CO2 Concentration in the Open Laying Hen House

The CO2 and NH3 concentrations were measured simultaneously to calculate the NH3 emission factor of the open laying hen house using the tracer gas method. The corresponding measurement results are summarized in Table 3. During the first period, when the winch curtain was closed, the internal concentration averaged 746.09 ppm, with a maximum of 967.47 ppm and a minimum of 534.60 ppm. During the second measurement period, when the curtain was open, the average concentration was 487.50 ppm, with a maximum of 577. 13 ppm and a minimum of 434 ppm. During the third period of intermittent operation, the average concentration was 494.08 ppm, with a maximum of 634.50 ppm and a minimum of 494.08 ppm. The average CO2 concentration inside the barn during the measurement periods was 709.22 ppm, with a maximum of 967.47 ppm and a minimum of 434.40 ppm. For external concentrations, the overall average was 427.07 ppm, with a maximum of 471.65 ppm and a minimum of 345.33 ppm.

3.3. NH3 Emission Factor in the Open Laying Hen House

The NH3 emission factor was calculated through Equations (1)–(3), and the ventilation rate was finally calculated through Equation (2), using the theoretical CO2 emission calculated through Equation (1) and the actual measured CO2 emission for laying hens’ weight and egg production. The NH3 emission factor of each open laying hen house was calculated using the tracer gas method for each measurement period and the corresponding results are summarized in Table 4. The NH3 emission factor was the lowest (0.01 kgNH3/year/AP) in the hen house when the winch curtain was open, whereas it was the highest (0.44 kgNH3/year/AP) when the winch curtain was closed. Moreover, it was 0.19 kgNH3/year/AP when the hen house was operated under mixed conditions, that is, the curtain was both open and closed. Hence, whether the winch curtain was open or closed influenced NH3 concentration.

3.4. NH3 Emission Factor in Relation to the Management of the Open Laying Hen House

Generally, when calculating emission factors based on measurements, they are developed using average values. In this study, in addition to the method of using the average value of the measurement-based average, which is widely used, we tried to reflect the characteristics according to the degree of utilization of the winch curtain used in the open-type barns mentioned earlier. The use of the winch curtain is due to the optimal breeding conditions. In the case of laying hens, if they are raised at temperatures above or below the optimal temperature, it can affect egg production and the life of the laying hen itself. Therefore, based on their previous experience, farmers raise laying hens by opening or closing the winch curtain according to whether it is cold or hot. We found that the optimal temperature for raising laying hens in the relevant previous studies was from 12 °C to 24 °C [21]. In this study, we considered the median value of the previous value (21 °C) to be the optimal temperature. When the temperature was higher than this, we assumed that the winch curtain would open to reflect these characteristics. The temperature data were applied by patterning the coefficients based on the meteorological data of the relevant region. Based on this assumption, the winch curtain in the breeding facility was open for 88 days and closed for 277 days, mainly from June to August, when the temperature was high. Therefore, the emission factor calculated by considering the operation method of the winch curtain and the emission factor calculated by using the actual measurement data as the average annual data were compared. The NH3 emission factor of the open laying hen house, considering whether the winch curtain was open or closed, was compared with the NH3 emission factors in other countries to assess the NH3 emission factor based on a reference annual average value. We found that the NH3 emission factor was 0.33 kgNH3/year/AP when the characteristics of the winch curtains were reflected. This value was higher than that acquired when the conventional annual average method was used (0.23 kgNH3/year/AP). The increase in the overall emission factor could be because the number of days when the winch curtain was used at the optimal breeding temperature was higher. The emission factor calculated in this study that reflected the opening and closing characteristics of the winch curtain was found to be similar to the emission factor values of Denmark and the Netherlands. Furthermore, the emission factor of this study was slightly lower than the emission factor of CORINAIR currently applied in Republic of Korea (Table 5). Therefore, further research related to the emission factor should be conducted in the future, considering the specific characteristics of Republic of Korea by reflecting the operation conditions of closed and open laying hen houses.
This study also presents some limitations. The study conducted measurements at only three times in one open laying hen house. Thus, applying and verifying the applicability of this method to more sites is necessary. Furthermore, research on other livestock species should be conducted as well. In the case of operating characteristics, further research should be conducted to standardize the opening and closing characteristics of the winch curtain and reflect these in discussing NH3 emission characteristics, as the winch curtain is intermittently opened and closed several times a day in spring and autumn. Moreover, the characteristics of this method can be identified by surveying the related farms.

4. Discussion

This study investigated the operational characteristics of winch curtains commonly used in Republic of Korea and assessed their impact on NH3 emission factors for open laying hen houses.
The results revealed that NH3 concentrations varied significantly with curtain position; concentrations were highest when curtains were closed (5.60 ppm), lowest when open, and intermediate during intermittent operation. The observed concentration during closed conditions was comparable to those reported in previous studies on closed-type poultry houses in Republic of Korea(3.89–6.65 ppm) [14]. The overall average concentration of 2.35 ppm throughout the measurement period reflected the combined characteristics of open and intermittent operations. This internal concentration aligns with the measurements (0.4–4.2 ppm) reported by Hinz et al. (2010) for cages with weekly belt removal systems [23]. Although our study utilized a scraper system without bedding, the weekly manure handling schedule created conditions similar to those in previous studies, where manure was managed periodically in cages [24,25,26,27]. External NH3 concentrations were moderately elevated compared to the typical urban atmospheric levels (0.001–0.02 ppm) reported in previous studies, likely due to the proximity (5 m) of other livestock housing areas, which was within the distance recommended by the VERA test protocol [28]. It is worth noting that these values exceeded Republic of Korea’s Malodor Prevention Act limits, which restrict odor emissions at site boundaries around livestock housing to less than 1 ppm. CO2 concentrations also exhibited variations depending on the operational conditions of the winch curtains.
The calculated ventilation rate for ammonia emission factor determination averaged 141,636 m3/h, ranging from 15.60 m3/h to 2,109,214 m3/h. Pearson’s correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation (r = 0.6) between ventilation rate and ammonia emission, consistent with findings from previous studies examining this relationship in livestock barns [29,30,31]. The NH3 emission factors derived in this study, which incorporated the operational characteristics of winch curtains, were comparable to those reported by VERA for facilities in the Netherlands and Denmark. This similarity may be attributed to the comparable crude protein (CP) content in feed, a factor known to influence NH3 emissions, across the studied poultry houses. These findings suggest that developing reliable emission factors may not require continuous measurement but rather the establishment of representative standard values for different winch curtain operational periods. This approach is particularly relevant in the Korean context, where farm owners typically prefer to minimize external visitor access to their facilities, making extended monitoring challenging. Therefore, when developing emission factors, it is essential to consider these practical constraints and strategically coordinate measurements during periods when tracer gas methods can be effectively applied and pest infestations are absent, thereby ensuring the representativeness of the collected data.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the NH3 emission factor was calculated using the tracer gas method for an open-laying hen house, and the emission factor calculation method accounted for whether the winch curtain was operated for the open hen house.
The annual average emission factors developed by considering the operating method of winch curtains used in Republic of Korea was similar to those of Denmark and the Netherlands, which are major livestock producing countries. Therefore, we confirmed that reflecting the opening and closing of winch curtains is an important method that better reflects Korean characteristics.
This study has contributed to the following research fields. We introduced the procedure for calculating NH3 emissions and emission factors by applying the tracer gas method, which is not the primary chamber measurement method used in Republic of Korea, so that we could review the directions for expanding such research-related measurement methods in Republic of Korea. And since this method does not require entering the actual livestock facilities, we proposed a method that can persuade livestock facilities, which are difficult to cooperate with. In particular, the measurement results did not show a significant difference from the overseas level, confirming the adequacy of the relevant methodology. In addition, the report introduced a method that can reflect the operational characteristics of livestock facilities and confirmed the difference between the previously used overseas NH3 emission factor and the existing factor in Republic of Korea, thereby discussing the need to develop a new emission factor based on the characteristics of the country and providing basic data to identify the characteristics.
However, in this study, only one open laying hen house was measured three times, so it is necessary to apply and verify this method in more places in the future. In addition, in this study, it was difficult to confirm the environmental characteristics because values of environmental data such as temperature and humidity could not be continuously obtained in a representative manner. Therefore, further research is needed to continuously obtain such data in the future.
While real-time measurement and monitoring would be the best practice, this is practically difficult to implement. Also, in the case of operating characteristics, since the winch curtain is intermittently opened and closed several times a day in spring and autumn, further study is necessary to standardize the opening and closing characteristics of the winch curtain and to reflect that in the ammonia emission characteristics. It is determined that this method can identify these characteristics through surveys of the relevant farms. In the future, it is necessary to secure a large amount of measurement data, segmented by season, for related measurement cases and operational forms to improve the standardization and reliability of the methodology.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the research presented in this work. Their contributions are presented below. Conceptualization, E.-c.J.; Methodology and writing—original draft preparation, S.K.; Project administration, S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the Korean Ministry of Environment (MOE) and Rural Development Administration (RDA).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ01499301)”, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. IQAir. 2023 World Air Quality Report; IQAir: Goldach, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ministry of Environment. Management Strategies to Reduce PM-2.5 Emission: Emphasis-Ammonia; Ministry of Environment: Incheon, Republic of Korea, 2017.
  3. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Fifth Assessment Report—Climate Change 2013; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ministry of Environment. Fine Dust, What Is It? Ministry of Environment: Incheon, Republic of Korea, 2016.
  5. Environmental Preservation Association. POLICY & ISSUES Environment column: Air Pollutant Total Management System. Environ. Inf. 2015, 416, 2–5. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rhee, V.A. Reveiw of the Special Act on the Seoul Metropolitan Air Improvement: The Total Mass emissions Managements and the Tradable Permit Programs. Public Law J. 2007, 8, 255–280. [Google Scholar]
  7. Moon, T.H.; Hur, J.W. Linking the Total Pollution Load Management System (TPLMS) and the Total Industrial Site Volume Control System (ISVCS) in the Capital Region, Korea. J. Korea Plan. Assoc. 2009, 44, 19–30. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ministry of Environment National Fine Dust Information Center. 2018 Air Pollutant Emissions; Ministry of Environment National Fine Dust Information Center: Cheongju, Republic of Korea, 2020.
  9. Ministry of Environment National Fine Dust Information Center. National Air Pollutant Emission Calculation Method Handbook (IV); Ministry of Environment National Fine Dust Information Center: Cheongju, Republic of Korea, 2020.
  10. European Environment Agency. EMEP/CORINAIR Atmospheric Emission Inventory Guidebook, 2nd ed.; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Danmark, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Development and Selection of Ammonia Emission Factors Final Report; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1994.
  12. Statistics Korea. 2020 Census of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; Statistics Korea: Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jae-Hwan, S. Ammonia Flux from Cow Manure in Relation to the Environmental Factors in Livestock Facilities. J. Korean Soc. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 26, 432–442. [Google Scholar]
  14. National Institute of Animal Science. Investigation and Analysis of Particulate Matters and Ammonia Concentrations in Mechanically Ventilated Broiler House According to Seasonal Change, Measurement Locations, and Age of Broilers; National Institute of Animal Science: Wanju County, Republic of Korea, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  15. Janke, D.; Willink, D.; Ammon, C.; Hempel, S.; Schrade, S.; Demeyer, P.; Hartung, E.; Amon, B.; Ogink, N.; Amon, T. Calculation of ventilation rates and ammonia emissions: Comparison of sampling strategies for a naturally ventilated dairy barn. Biosyst. Eng. 2020, 198, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Edouard, N.; Mosquera, J.; Hendrik, J.C.D.; Mendes, L.B.; Ogink, N.W.M. Comparison of CO2 and SF6 based tracer gas methods for the estimation of ventilation rates in a naturally ventilated dairy barn. Biosyst. Eng. 2016, 149, 11–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kilic, I.; Yaslioglu, E. Ammonia and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in a Layer House. Asian Australas J. Anim. 2014, 27, 1211–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ogink, N.W.M.; Mosquera, J.; Calvet, S.; Zhang, G. Methods for measuring gas emissions from naturally ventilated livestock buildings: Developments over the last decade and perspectives for improvement. Biosyst. Eng. 2013, 116, 298–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Verification of Environmental Technologies for Agricultural Production. VERA TEST PROTOCOL for Livestock Housing and Management Systems Version 3:2018-09; Verification of Environmental Technologies for Agricultural Production: Vliderweg, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  20. International Commission of Agricultural Engineering. 4th Report of Working Group on Climatization of Animal Houses Heat and Moisture Production at Animal and House Levels; International Commission of Agricultural Engineering: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  21. Durmuş, I.; Kamanli, S. Effects of cold and heat stress on egg quality traits of a newly developed native hybrid layer. Turk. Tarim. Gida. Bilim. Teknol. Derg. 2015, 3, 444–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. CORINAIR. EMEP/CORINAIR Atmospheric Emission Inventory Guidebook, 2nd ed.; CORINAIR: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hinz, T.; Winter, T.; Linke, S. Luftfremde stoffe in und aus verschiedenen haltungssystemen fürlegehennen—Teil 1: Ammoniak. Landbauforschung 2010, 60, 139–150. (In German) [Google Scholar]
  24. Liang, Y.; Xin, H.; Li, H.; Wheeler, E.F.; Zajaczkowski, J.L.; Topper, P.A.; Gates, R.S.; Casey, K.D.; Behrends, B.B.; Burnham, D.J.; et al. Ammonia emissions from U.S. Laying hen houses in Iowa and Pennsylvania. Trans. ASAE 2005, 48, 1927–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nimmermark, S.; Lund, V.; Gustafsson, G.; Eduard, W. Ammonia, dust and bacteria in welfare-oriented systems for laying hens. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2009, 16, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Costa, A.; Ferrari, S.; Guarino, M. Yearly emission factors of ammonia and particulate matter from three laying-hen housing systems. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2012, 52, 1089–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhao, Y.; Shepherd, T.A.; Li, H.; Xin, H. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems—Part I: Monitoring system and indoor air quality. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 518–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Park, J.S.; Ryoo, J.Y.; Jee, J.B.; Song, M.J. Origins and Distributions of Atmospheric Ammonia in Jeonju during 2019~2020. J. Korean Soc. Atmos. Environ. 2020, 36, 262–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sanchis, E.; Clavet, S.; Prado, A.d. A meta-analysis of environmental factor effects on ammonia emissions from dairy cattle houses. Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 178, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Simsek, E.; Kilic, I.; Yaslioglu, E.; Arici, I. Ammonia Emissions from Dairy Cattle Barns in Summer Season. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2012, 11, 2116–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, G.; Strøm, J.S.; Li, B.; Rom, H.B.; Morsing, S.; Dahl, P.; Wang, C. Emission of Ammonia and Other Contaminant Gases from Naturally Ventilated Dairy Cattle Buildings. Biosyst. Eng. 2005, 92, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of NH3 and CO2 measurement positions at the open laying hen house.
Figure 1. Schematic of NH3 and CO2 measurement positions at the open laying hen house.
Atmosphere 16 00581 g001
Table 1. Agronomic requirements for laying hens.
Table 1. Agronomic requirements for laying hens.
Laying Hens
(This Study)
Laying Hens
(VERA Test Protocol)
Permitted weight range (kg)1.8-
Minimal period of
use of the housing system
More than 2 months2 months
Feed requirements’ crude protein (CP)16–18% CPDK: 16–18% CP
DE: 15–20% CP
Minimum number of animals4000750
Table 2. Ammonia concentration at the open laying hen house.
Table 2. Ammonia concentration at the open laying hen house.
ClassificationNH3
(ppm)
nOperation
InOut
1stMean5.600.4641Closed operation of the winch curtain
Max9.590.49
Min3.220.24
2ndMean0.200.1732Open operation of the winch curtain
Max0.330.30
Min0.100.08
3rdMean0.700.3143Intermittent operation of the winch curtain
Max1.720.62
Min0.270.17
Mean2.360.38
Max9.590.62
Min0.100.08
Table 3. CO2 concentration at the open laying hen house.
Table 3. CO2 concentration at the open laying hen house.
ClassificationCO2
(ppm)
nOperation
InOut
1stMean746.09457.6641Closed operation of the winch curtain
Max967.47471.65
Min534.60438.25
2ndMean487.50396.5232Open operation of the winch curtain
Max577.13421.00
Min434.00369.00
3rdMean494.08427.0443Intermittent operation of the
winch curtain
Max634.50478.25
Min494.08345.33
Mean709.22427.07 -
Max967.47471.65
Min434.40369.00
Table 4. NH3 emission factors in relation to the operation in the open laying hen house.
Table 4. NH3 emission factors in relation to the operation in the open laying hen house.
ClassificationNH3 Emission Factor
(kgNH3/Year/AP)
Operation
1st0.44Closed operation of the winch curtain
2nd0.01Open operation of the winch curtain
3rd0.19Intermittent operation of the winch curtain
Mean0.31-
Table 5. Compression of thezNH3 emission factor of the laying hen house.
Table 5. Compression of thezNH3 emission factor of the laying hen house.
ClassificationLaying Hen House
(kg NH3/Year/AP)
This studyMean annual basis0.23
Winch curtain characteristic basis0.33
CORINAIR (1999) [22]0.37
Denmark (2018) [19]0.32
The Netherlands (2018) [19]0.315
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, S.; Jeon, E.-c.; Lee, S. A Study on the Application of an Estimated Ammonia Emission Factor Reflecting the Operating Characteristics of Open Laying Hen Houses in Korea. Atmosphere 2025, 16, 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050581

AMA Style

Kang S, Jeon E-c, Lee S. A Study on the Application of an Estimated Ammonia Emission Factor Reflecting the Operating Characteristics of Open Laying Hen Houses in Korea. Atmosphere. 2025; 16(5):581. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050581

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kang, Seongmin, Eui-chan Jeon, and Sihyoung Lee. 2025. "A Study on the Application of an Estimated Ammonia Emission Factor Reflecting the Operating Characteristics of Open Laying Hen Houses in Korea" Atmosphere 16, no. 5: 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050581

APA Style

Kang, S., Jeon, E.-c., & Lee, S. (2025). A Study on the Application of an Estimated Ammonia Emission Factor Reflecting the Operating Characteristics of Open Laying Hen Houses in Korea. Atmosphere, 16(5), 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050581

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop