Next Article in Journal
On-Road Measurements and Modelling of Disc Brake Temperatures and Brake Wear Particle Number Emissions on a Heavy-Duty Tractor Trailer
Previous Article in Journal
Holiday Effect of Ozone Pollution in China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Climate Factors Dominate the Spatial Distribution of Soil Nutrients in Desert Grassland
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spatiotemporal Characteristic of XCO2 and Its Changing Contribution Rate from Different Influencing Indicators in Mongolian Plateau of Central Asia

1
College of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China
2
Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing & Geography Information System, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China
3
College of Computer Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China
4
Division of Environmental and Natural Resource Management, Institute of Geography and Geoecology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar 15170, Mongolia
5
Department of Environment and Forest Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, National Univesity of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar 15170, Mongolia
6
Inner Mongolia Yitaibaotan Envirmental Technology Co., Ltd., Hohhot 010022, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2025, 16(5), 560; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050560
Submission received: 6 January 2025 / Revised: 2 May 2025 / Accepted: 3 May 2025 / Published: 8 May 2025

Abstract

:
The Mongolian Plateau plays a crucial role in global carbon cycling, but the spatiotemporal characteristics of XCO2 concentration and its driving mechanism remain insufficiently explored. To solve this scientific issue, the synergistic methodology of mathematical statistics—the Pearson correlation and random forest model—was established using the main source of Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) satellite data. Results indicate the following: (1) Average XCO2 concentration of the Mongolian Plateau was 412 ppm, with an annual growth rate of 2.29 ppm/a from 2018 to 2022, along with higher values in the south and lower values in the north. The seasonal change displayed a clear temporal feature, in the order of spring (414.83 ppm) > winter (413.4 ppm) > autumn (411.3 ppm) > summer (409.12 ppm). The spatial distributions in spring, autumn, and winter were relatively consistent, all showing higher XCO2 concentrations in the east and lower concentrations in the west, whereas summer exhibited the opposite pattern. (2) From the perspective of the natural environment, XCO2 change was negatively correlated with the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), precipitation (PRE), and temperature (TEMP). Temporal analysis further revealed that this negative correlation was most pronounced in the eastern region, in which these three elements were all relatively high. (3) According to the random forest model, the influence of both single and interactive factors on the plateau’s XCO2 varied significantly. A comparison of driving factors revealed that the NDVI had the highest contribution rate (0.35), followed by fossil fuel combustion emissions (ODIAC), wind direction (WD), and wind speed (WS). As for interaction effects, the combination of NDVI and ODIAC showed the highest contribution rate (over 0.25), indicating a strong joint influence on XCO2. Other important interactions included WS and WD, ODIAC and WS, and NDVI and WS (all above 0.05). These findings provide valuable insights into the driving mechanisms of XCO2 on the Mongolian Plateau, offering a reference for regional carbon emission reduction policies.

1. Introduction

Global climate change is profoundly impacting the Earth’s system, with global warming—driven by the rapid rise in greenhouse gas concentrations such as carbon dioxide and methane—posing a significant threat to ecosystems [1]. The Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change highlights that over the past century, the overall increase in global temperatures has been primarily caused by fossil fuel combustion and emissions of other greenhouse gases, with the current global average temperature now approximately 1.1 °C higher than pre-industrial levels [2]. The instability of the global climate system and ongoing warming trends have led to more frequent extreme weather events, bringing risks to human life and production activities [3]. As a key ecological region of the Eurasian continent, the Mongolian Plateau is highly sensitive to global climate change, making it an ideal location for studying CO2 variations and their driving mechanisms [4]. Understanding the spatiotemporal characteristics of CO2 changes in this region and their influencing factors will not only deepen our knowledge of regional carbon cycle processes, but also provide valuable scientific insights for global climate change research.
The Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) and the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) are two major ground-based observation networks that provide high-precision data on surface and column-averaged CO2 concentrations [5]. However, the spatial coverage of ground-based observation stations is limited, making it challenging to comprehensively depict the global distribution of CO2. In contrast, satellite observations utilizing solar or terrestrial radiation in the near-infrared/shortwave infrared (NIR/SWIR) and thermal infrared (TIR) bands can provide large-scale CO2 data, significantly expanding the spatial coverage of observations [6]. Currently, multiple satellites, including the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS), the Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric CH4 (SCIAMACHY), the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI), and Sentinel-5P, are widely used for global greenhouse gas monitoring [7,8,9,10,11]. In recent years, satellites specifically designed for CO2 observation, such as TanSat, GOSAT, and OCO-2, have further improved measurement accuracy and spatial resolution [12]. Among them, OCO-2, launched by NASA on 2 July 2014, is dedicated to global atmospheric CO2 monitoring. OCO-2 employs shortwave infrared retrieval techniques to provide high-precision, high-temporal-resolution data on the column-averaged dry-air mole fraction of CO2. This study utilizes OCO-2 observational data to analyze the spatiotemporal variations of XCO2 over the Mongolian Plateau and its influencing factors.
Currently, research on atmospheric CO2 variations over the Mongolian Plateau remains relatively limited, particularly in terms of long-term XCO2 observations and analyses of its driving factors. Existing studies primarily focus on the spatiotemporal variations of near-surface CO2 over this region. Specifically, the annual average concentration of near-surface CO2 over the Mongolian Plateau has shown a gradual increase, ranging from 2.19 to 2.38 ppm/a [13]. Furthermore, studies on near-surface CO2 and its influencing factors in Mongolia indicate that, based on Köppen climate classification analysis, CO2 concentrations are negatively correlated with the NDVI [14]. While these studies provide valuable insights into the carbon cycle processes of the Mongolian Plateau, they are largely constrained to near-surface observations and lack a systematic assessment of XCO2 and its environmental drivers.
As can be seen from the above, spatiotemporal monitoring and driving research on XCO2 has become a current academic focus. Regarding this scientific issue, the research was executed using high-resolution OCO-2 satellite observations in this study. Our research objective is (1) to provide the spatiotemporal distribution and seasonal evolution pattern of XCO2 over the Mongolian Plateau (i.e., Inner Mongolia of China and Mongolia Country); (2) to analyze the changes in XCO2 from the perspectives of natural environmental factors and human activities, and further to quantify the contributions of different environmental factors and human activities to XCO2 variations and identify key driving forces, including the factors of temperature, precipitation, wind speed, vegetation, and fossil fuel combustion; and (3) to explore the interactions among major environmental factors and their influence on XCO2 dynamics. In the process of achieving this goal, we innovatively employed the random forest model to quantify the contributions of different factors to XCO2 changes. To establish a better approach system to comprehensively analyze the research content, the synergistic methodology of mathematical statistics—Pearson correlation and random forest model—was established. This research contributes to the quantitative assessment of CO2 changes in the region and provides a scientific basis for the fields of industrial carbon emissions, climate warming, and extreme weather events.

2. Data and Methods

2.1. Overview of the Study Area

The Mongolian Plateau is located in Central Asia, roughly spanning 37°–52° N and 87°–122° E. As shown in Figure 1, the region is characterized by a relatively high elevation, predominantly ranging between 800 and 1500 m [15]. It features an arid to semi-arid climate, with low annual temperatures and scarce precipitation. The ecosystem is primarily composed of grasslands, deserts, and forests. In recent years, climate change and human activities have increasingly threatened the region’s ecological stability, exacerbating issues such as vegetation degradation and desertification, which in turn have weakened its carbon sequestration capacity while intensifying carbon emission pressures [16]. As a typical inland region, the Mongolian Plateau is not directly influenced by oceanic carbon sinks, and its XCO2 variations are primarily regulated by terrestrial ecosystems and anthropogenic emissions. Its unique geographical location and climatic conditions make it a key area for climate change research.

2.2. Data Collection

2.2.1. OCO-2 Data

This study primarily utilized the OCO-2 Level 2 Lite Full Physics Version 11.1r satellite data products relevant to the study region. OCO-2 is specifically designed for global atmospheric CO2 concentration measurements. It operates in a sun-synchronous orbit (approximately 705 km above the Earth’s surface), completing one orbit around the Earth every 99 min, with a local overpass time of 13:36 [17]. It is equipped with a hyperspectral imaging spectrometer, which provides ground-level XCO2 observation data with a spatial resolution of approximately 2.25 km, with an expected precision ranging from 0.5 to 1 ppm [18]. To ensure high-quality and reliable data, region-specific observations were filtered using a quality flag value of 0, although some temporal and spatial data gaps may still exist due to orbital and atmospheric limitations.

2.2.2. MODIS Data

The normalized difference vegetation index is derived from the MOD13A3 dataset of the MODIS satellite and is widely used to assess vegetation growth and health. This dataset provides NDVI values with an 8-day temporal resolution and a 500-m spatial resolution, enabling precise monitoring of vegetation seasonality and growth dynamics [19]. Since vegetation influences CO2 concentrations through both photosynthesis and respiration, the NDVI is chosen as a representative vegetation index because it not only directly reflects vegetation coverage but also provides long-term continuous observations, making it suitable for large-scale assessments of vegetation’s impact on XCO2 variations.

2.2.3. ERA5-Land Data

ERA5-Land is a high-resolution reanalysis dataset provided by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, featuring a spatial resolution of 0.1° and an hourly temporal resolution, making it suitable for regional climate change analysis. This study utilizes 2-m air temperature, 10-m wind direction, and wind speed from ERA5-Land [20]. Air temperature influences vegetation growth and soil respiration, thereby regulating regional CO2 exchange, while wind direction and wind speed play a crucial role in atmospheric CO2 transport, shaping the spatial distribution of XCO2 [21]. To facilitate analysis, this study applies a conversion formula to transform U and V wind components into wind speed and wind direction data for evaluating their impact on the spatial distribution of XCO2.

2.2.4. CHIRPS Data

Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS) is a high-resolution precipitation dataset that integrates satellite observations with ground-based meteorological station data, providing precipitation estimates at a 0.05° spatial resolution and daily temporal resolution. This study utilizes CHIRPS precipitation data (PRE), as precipitation is a key factor influencing vegetation growth and soil moisture. Additionally, it plays a regulatory role in soil microbial activity and carbon release processes [22]. Table 1 presents detailed information on the datasets used in this study, including OCO-2, MODIS, ERA5-Land, ODIAC and CHIRPS.

2.3. Research Methodology

2.3.1. Preprocessing of OCO-2 Satellite Data

To facilitate the analysis of the spatiotemporal distribution of XCO2, spatial interpolation is applied to convert discrete point data into a continuous spatial distribution map. However, the high density of OCO-2 satellite observation points may lead to overfitting if interpolated directly. To reduce data redundancy and mitigate this issue, this study applies an averaging process using a 0.1° × 0.1° grid to resample the XCO2 data. This approach enhances the smoothness of the interpolation results and improves spatial visualization.

2.3.2. Factor Selection and Calculation

For time-series data integration and spatial correlation analysis, XCO2 data are overlaid with the monthly mean raster data of each influencing factor to generate a multi-band time-series image. Correlation analysis tools are then used to compute the pixel-wise correlation between XCO2 and the multi-band images of influencing factors. This study employs the Pearson correlation coefficient, which ranges from –1 to 1 and quantifies the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables: –1 indicates a perfect negative correlation, 0 indicates no linear correlation, and 1 indicates a perfect positive correlation. The formula used to obtain this value is given below:
r = ( X X ¯ ) ( Y Y ¯ ) ( X X ¯ ) 2 ( Y Y ¯ ) 2
Here, X and Y are two variables representing the XCO2 values and the values of each influencing factor, respectively, and X ¯ and Y ¯ are the mean values of these two variables [23,24].

2.3.3. Variance Inflation Factor Analysis

To quantitatively assess collinearity among independent variables, the variance inflation factor (VIF) was calculated. The VIF quantifies the extent to which a given variable is explained by other independent variables, and the thresholds are commonly defined as follows: VIF < 5: Weak collinearity, negligible impact; 5 ≤ VIF < 10: Moderate collinearity, acceptable influence; VIF ≥ 10: Severe collinearity, which may affect model stability and requires corrective measures. The formula for the VIF is as follows:
V I F i = 1 1 R i 2
Here, R i 2 represents the coefficient of determination when the i th explanatory variable is regressed on all other explanatory variables.

2.3.4. ODIAC Data

The Open-source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic CO2 is a dataset providing high-resolution global CO2 emission data. It uses a 1 × 1 km grid to record CO2 emissions from human activities in detail, covering major sources such as fossil fuel combustion, cement production, and natural gas burning [23,24]. The ODIAC dataset has been developed by an international research team to provide accurate and accessible information on global CO2 emissions in support of in-depth research on climate change and environmental management.
As shown in Figure 2, ODIAC data indicate that CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion are primarily concentrated in Inner Mongolia, particularly in the Hohhot–Baotou–Ordos region. This area has a relatively high level of industrialization and a dense transportation network, forming distinct CO2 emission hotspots. In contrast, CO2 emissions in Mongolia are relatively sparse and mainly concentrated in and around the capital, Ulaanbaatar. Specifically, the Hohhot–Baotou–Ordos region hosts 1219 heavy industry enterprises, accounting for 42% of all heavy industry enterprises in Inner Mongolia’s 12 leagues and cities, highlighting the region’s significant contribution to CO2 emissions.
It was determined that fossil fuel combustion on the Mongolian Plateau resulted in approximately 1114 Mt of CO2 emissions. Statistical analysis of CO2 emissions across leagues and cities revealed significant differences between Inner Mongolia and Mongolia. As shown in Figure 3, red represents emissions from Mongolia, while blue represents the average monthly emissions from Inner Mongolia. The results indicate that Mongolia accounts for only 6% of total emissions (approximately 62 Mt), whereas Inner Mongolia contributes 94% (approximately 1052 Mt).
Further analysis identified four leagues and cities with monthly CO2 emissions exceeding 100 Mt, namely, Ordos, Hohhot, Hulunbuir, and Baotou. Among these, Ordos displays the highest emissions, reaching approximately 200 Mt. In fact, Ordos produced 7.787 billion tons of coal in 2022, accounting for one-sixth of China’s total coal production, earning it the title of China’s largest coal-producing city. In contrast, coal combustion in Mongolia is primarily concentrated in Ulaanbaatar, with the rest of the country collectively emitting approximately 219 Mt.

2.3.5. Random Forest Model

This study’s random forest model was an ensemble learning method based on decision trees aimed at analyzing the contribution of various driving factors to the spatial distribution and changes of XCO2 on the Mongolian Plateau. Here, XCO2 was treated as the target variable, while six driving factors, NDVI, TEMP, PRE, WD, WS, and ODIAC, were treated as feature variables aimed at constructing a regression model. Random forest performs its regression task by training multiple decision trees; each tree’s prediction contributes to the final predicted value of the target variable. During training, each decision tree randomly selects a subset of the training data; at each splitting node, a random subset of features is chosen. Within this subset, the best split point is subsequently selected. The training continues until the maximum depth of a given tree is reached or the number of samples in a leaf node becomes smaller than the predefined minimum sample value. For each input sample, all decision trees provide a prediction; the final predicted value is the average of all the trees’ predictions. The formula used to obtain this value is given below:
y ^ = 1 N i = 1 N y i
Here, y ^ represents the final predicted value, y i is the prediction from the ith tree, and N is the total number of decision trees [25].
The random forest model also measures the contribution of each feature to the final prediction by calculating the former’s importance across all trees. A common method for calculating feature importance involves assessing the reduction in mean squared error (MSE) for each tree [26]. Specifically, the contribution of each feature to the reduction in model error at each split point is calculated. Thereafter, the contribution value of each feature is averaged across all decision trees, which results in the final feature importance score being obtained. The formula regarding the final feature importance is given as follows:
I m p o r t a n c e j = 1 N i = 1 N ( M S E b e f o r e M S E a f t e r )
Here, I m p o r t a n c e j represents the final importance of feature j , while M S E b e f o r e and M S E a f t e r represent the MSEs before and after the split (using the same feature), respectively. Thus, the random forest model can not only quantify the impact of each feature on the prediction of XCO2 variations but also reveal the importance of different driving factors in the spatial distribution and spatiotemporal changes of XCO2 [27].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Analysis of Overall Distribution and Seasonal Evolution Pattern of XCO2

To analyze the spatial distribution characteristics of XCO2 in different regions of the Mongolian Plateau, this study performs statistical analysis on the XCO2 data from 2018 to 2022. As shown in Figure 4, the average XCO2 concentration in the study area is 412 ppm. XCO2 exhibits an overall increasing trend, with a total increase of 11.44 ppm, corresponding to an average annual growth rate of 2.29 ppm/a, which is 2.18 higher than the global average growth rate [28]. In different regions, there is a significant difference in XCO2 between the regions of Inner Mongolia of China and Mongolia, with the spatiotemporal distribution of XCO2 on the Mongolian Plateau showing higher values in the south and lower values in the north. The regions with higher concentrations are mainly located in the central region of Inner Mongolia, such as the cities of Hohhot and Ordos.
According to the interaction between sources and sinks, the atmospheric XCO2 concentration in a region exhibits temporal variations. For the Northern Hemisphere, the concentration typically reaches its peak in April and its lowest point in August, with seasonal average values showing consistent patterns. Thus, this study divides the year into four seasons based on months, namely, spring (March–May, MAM), summer (June–August, JJA), autumn (September–November, SON), and winter (December–February, DJF). As shown in this figure, the seasonal averages are as follows: spring (414.83 ppm) > winter (413.4 ppm) > autumn (411.3 ppm) > summer (409.12 ppm). The distribution patterns in spring, winter, and autumn are relatively consistent, with the eastern region showing higher concentrations than the western region (Figure 5a–c). But for summer, the distribution pattern reverses compared to the other three seasons—that is, the eastern region has lower XCO2 concentrations than the western region (Figure 5d).

3.2. Analysis of the XCO2 Changing Correlations from the Perspectives of Natural Environments

The Mongolian Plateau, located in a high-latitude inland region, exhibits distinct climatic differences influenced by latitudinal zonality. The southern part of the plateau is relatively warmer, while moisture primarily originates from the Pacific and Arctic Oceans, leading to higher precipitation levels in the eastern and northern regions. This study employs Pearson correlation analysis to examine the linear relationships between these natural factors and XCO2.
As illustrated in Figure 6, XCO2 is significantly negatively correlated with the NDVI, precipitation, and temperature across most of the plateau, indicating that areas with a higher NDVI, greater precipitation, and moderate temperatures generally correspond to lower XCO2 levels. Temporal correlation analysis further reveals that this negative correlation is most pronounced in the eastern regions, where vegetation cover is higher, precipitation is more abundant, and temperatures are moderate. These findings suggest a strong association between XCO2 variations and natural factors across the Mongolian Plateau.

3.2.1. Collinearity Issue Is Reliable in Mongolian Plateau for Analyzing the XCO2 Changing Correlations from the Perspectives of Natural Environments

In this study, temporal Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between XCO2 and three environmental factors, NDVI, precipitation, and temperature, based on monthly data from 2018 to 2022 (Figure 7). The results indicate that all three factors are significantly negatively correlated with XCO2 (correlation coefficients of −0.48, −0.46, and −0.33, respectively), suggesting that vegetation activity, precipitation, and temperature may have a suppressing effect on XCO2. This finding is consistent with previous analyses. However, further temporal correlation analysis among NDVI, PRE, and TEMP revealed strong intercorrelations (correlation coefficients of 0.89, 0.89, and 0.80, respectively), indicating similar temporal variation trends among these environmental factors. Therefore, it is necessary to further evaluate the issue of multicollinearity among these environmental factors.
The VIF values calculated in this study are as follows: NDVI = 4.87, PRE = 6.99, and TEMP = 2.35. While PRE’s VIF slightly exceeds 5, all variables remain below the critical threshold of 10, indicating that collinearity is acceptable.

3.2.2. Analysis of the Effect of Wind Field on XCO2

The Mongolian Plateau, located in northern Asia, serves as a crucial pathway for atmospheric circulation. It is primarily influenced by the westerly wind belt and the monsoon system, both of which play key roles in the transport of regional air masses. This study utilizes wind field data from all twelve months of 2018 to analyze the characteristics of wind speed and direction in the region, and to explore their potential impact on the spatial distribution of XCO2. As shown in Figure 8, the annual mean wind speed over the plateau is 1.63 m/s. Higher wind speeds, exceeding 2 m/s, are observed from November to February of the following year, mainly concentrated in the central and eastern parts of the region. From March onward, wind speeds gradually decrease, reaching their lowest point in August. Southerly winds dominate for most of the year, while winds in the east–west direction show no clear pattern.
We employed the Pearson correlation coefficient to analyze the impact of wind direction and wind speed on XCO2 concentrations over the Mongolian Plateau. As shown in Figure 9, considering that wind direction is a circular rather than a linear variable, the wind direction and speed data were converted into two components, U (zonal wind) and V (meridional wind), for analysis. The results indicate that the average correlation coefficient between XCO2 and the U component is 0.32, showing an overall positive correlation. The figure illustrates that only a small portion of the western region exhibits a negative correlation, suggesting that an increase in westerly winds tends to be associated with a rise in regional XCO2 concentrations. The average correlation coefficient between the V component and XCO2 is −0.23, indicating that stronger northerly winds are also associated with increased XCO2 concentrations. Conversely, enhanced southerly winds correspond to a decrease in XCO2 levels. This pattern is particularly evident in the southern and eastern parts of the Mongolian Plateau.

3.3. Analysis of the Contributions of Single and Interactive Factors to XCO2 Changes

3.3.1. Analysis of Contribution Rates of Different Influencing Factors on XCO2 Changes

The contribution rates of different influencing factors on XCO2 changes were analyzed using a random forest model. To assess the model’s prediction performance, we calculated MSE and RMSE. The calculation results indicated that the model’s MSE was 18.8 and its RMSE was 4.3, suggesting that the average prediction error was 4.2 ppm, accounting for approximately 1% of the plateau’s total XCO2. The random forest model effectively captured the variation trends of XCO2 on the plateau and demonstrated high accuracy. Figure 10 illustrates the contribution rates of the primary driving factors to the spatiotemporal variation of XCO2 on the Mongolian Plateau. Evidently, the influence of each factor on the plateau’s XCO2 varied significantly, indicating that changes in XCO2 on the Mongolian Plateau were driven by multiple environmental and anthropogenic factors. Among these, the NDVI, as the primary carbon sink indicator, was deemed the most important, with a contribution rate of 0.35, underscoring the key role of vegetation in carbon absorption. Fossil fuel combustion emissions, with a contribution rate of 0.2, revealed a significant impact of human activities on CO2 concentrations on the plateau, particularly in areas with intensive industrial activities. Additionally, WD and WS each had an importance value that exceeded 0.1, revealing their moderate influence on XCO2 variation in the plateau region. In contrast, PRE and TEMP had a low contribution rate. This reflected the complexity of XCO2 distribution pattern on the Mongolian Plateau. Therefore, vegetation and fossil fuel combustion emissions were the two key factors that predominantly influenced the spatiotemporal variation of XCO2 on the plateau, while other factors influenced XCO2 distribution and concentration to varying degrees.

3.3.2. Analysis of Contribution Rate of Interactive Factors on XCO2 Changes

This study employs a random forest model to assess the interactive effects of six environmental factors on XCO2 concentrations over the Mongolian Plateau. As shown in Figure 11, the NDVI and ODIAC emerge as the most significant interaction terms, with a contribution rate of over 0.25, indicating that the coupling between vegetation and fossil fuel emissions plays the most important role in the regional carbon cycle. Additionally, WS and WD, ODIAC and WS, and NDVI and WS also exhibit a high contribution rate of over 0.05, suggesting that wind direction, by influencing spatial transport patterns, interacts with other factors to determine atmospheric XCO2 distribution. Further analysis reveals that climate-related interactions, such as NDVI and PRE, TEMP and PRE, and TEMP and WD, are also significant, reflecting the combined effects of environmental factors on carbon exchange. These findings further underscore the critical role of vegetation in regulating XCO2 variations over the Mongolian Plateau and highlight its sensitivity to anthropogenic emission changes.

4. Conclusions

This study analyzed the spatial–temporal characteristics of XCO2 over the Mongolian Plateau from 2018 to 2022 and investigated the key driving factors influencing its variations. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1)
For overall distribution and seasonal changes of XCO2, the average XCO2 concentration is 412 ppm, with an annual growth rate of 2.29 ppm/a from 2018 to 2022. In different regions, XCO2 concentrations exhibit significant spatial heterogeneity, with higher values in the southern regions and lower values in the north. The regions with higher concentrations are primarily located in the central region of Inner Mongolia, particularly in cities such as Hohhot and Ordos. Meanwhile, the seasonal analysis reveals a clear temporal pattern, with the following order: spring (414.83 ppm) > winter (413.4 ppm) > autumn (411.3 ppm) > summer (409.12 ppm). The XCO2 concentration patterns in spring, winter, and autumn are relatively consistent, with higher values in eastern regions and lower in western regions, but the pattern is the opposite in summer.
(2)
From the perspectives of natural environments on XCO2 changes, XCO2 is significantly negatively correlated with the NDVI, precipitation, and temperature across most of the plateau, indicating that areas with a higher NDVI, greater precipitation, and moderate temperatures generally correspond to lower XCO2 levels. Temporal correlation analysis further reveals that this negative correlation is most pronounced in the eastern regions, where vegetation cover is higher, precipitation is more abundant, and temperatures are moderate.
(3)
As for the contributions of single and interactive factors to XCO2 changes, evidently, the influence of each factor on the plateau’s XCO2 varied. The NDVI, as the primary carbon sink indicator, was deemed the most important, with a contribution rate of 0.35, followed by fossil fuel combustion emissions, WD, and WS, but PRE and TEMP displayed a low contribution rate. Meanwhile, for interactive factors, the NDVI and ODIAC showed the highest contribution rate (over 0.25). WS and WD, ODIAC and WS, and NDVI and WS also exhibited a high contribution rate (over 0.05), while the contributions of other factors were lower.

Author Contributions

Visualization, conceptualization, data curation, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, Y.A.; conceptualization, supervision, methodology, writing—review and editing, Z.B. and S.D.; supervision, resources, funding acquisition, S.T.; supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, Y.B.; investigation, supervision, inspection, funding acquisition, B.N. and X.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42467062), Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China (2022LHQN04002) Fundamental Research Funds for the Inner Mongolia Normal University (2022JBQN107), and Introduction of High-Level Talents Scientific Research Start-up Fund Project (2021YJRC012).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created for this paper. The data in the paper were downloaded from the address provided in the data section and calculated using the formulas in the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

Xinle Fan is employees of Inner Mongolia Yitaibaotan Envirmental Technology Co., Ltd. The paper reflects the views of the scientists and not the company.

References

  1. Li, H.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y. Spatial-temporal characteristics and drivers of the regional residential CO2 emissions in China during 2000–2017. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 124116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lynn, J.; Peeva, N. Communications in the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report cycle. Clim. Change 2021, 169, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. AghaKouchak, A.; Chiang, F.; Huning, L.S.; Love, C.A.; Mallakpour, I.; Mazdiyasni, O.; Moftakhari, H.; Papalexiou, S.M.; Ragno, E.; Sadegh, M. Climate Extremes and Compound Hazards in a Warming World. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2020, 48, 519–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dong, G.; Zhao, F.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Qu, L.; Jiang, S.; Ochirbat, B.; Chen, J.; Xin, X.; Shao, C. Non-climatic component provoked substantial spatiotemporal changes of carbon and water use efficiency on the Mongolian Plateau. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 095009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zheng, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, S. Comparison of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentrations Based on GOSAT, OCO-2 Observations and Ground-Based TCCON Data. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 5172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yin, S.; Wang, X.; Tani, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhong, G.; Sun, Z.; Chittenden, A.R. Analyzing temporo-spatial changes and the distribution of the CO2 concentration in Australia from 2009 to 2016 by greenhouse gas monitoring satellites. Atmos. Environ. 2018, 192, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Whitburn, S.; Clarisse, L.; Crapeau, M.; August, T.; Hultberg, T.; Coheur, P.F.; Clerbaux, C. A CO2 independent cloud mask from Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) radiances for climate applications. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2022, 15, 6653–6668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, L.; Wei, C.; Liu, H.; Jiang, H.; Lu, X.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, C. Comparison analysis of global methane concentration derived from SCIAMACHY, AIRS, and GOSAT with surface station measurements. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2021, 42, 1823–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fang, J.; Chen, B.; Zhang, H.; Dilawar, A.; Guo, M.; Liu, C.; Liu, S.A.; Gemechu, T.M.; Zhang, X. Global Evaluation and Intercomparison of XCO2 Retrievals from GOSAT, OCO-2, and TANSAT with TCCON. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 5073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bodah, B.W.; Neckel, A.; Stolfo Maculan, L.; Milanes, C.B.; Korcelski, C.; Ramírez, O.; Mendez-Espinosa, J.F.; Bodah, E.T.; Oliveira, M.L.S. Sentinel-5P TROPOMI satellite application for NO2 and CO studies aiming at environmental valuation. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 357, 131960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mousavi, S.-M.; Mobarghaee Dinan, N.; Ansarifard, S. Examination and Analysis of Annual, Seasonal, and Monthly Variations in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentration Across the Middle East Region Utilizing SCIAMACHY, GOSAT, and OCO-2 Satellite Data. Environ. Sci. 2024, 22, 305–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xie, F.; Ren, T.; Zhao, C.; Wen, Y.; Gu, Y.; Zhou, M.; Wang, P.; Shiomi, K.; Morino, I. Fast retrieval of XCO2 over east Asia based on Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) spectral measurements. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2024, 17, 3949–3967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Adiya, S.; Dalantai, S.; Wu, T.; Wu, X.; Yamkhin, J.; Bao, Y.; Sumiya, E.; Yadamsuren, G.; Avirmed, D.; Dorjgotov, B. Spatial and temporal change patterns of near-surface CO2 and CH4 concentrations in different permafrost regions on the Mongolian Plateau from 2010 to 2017. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 800, 149433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Te, T.; Bagan, H.; Che, M.; Hou, X.; Uudus, B. Spatiotemporal variability of near-surface CO2 and its affecting factors over Mongolia. Environ. Res. 2023, 236, 116796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bai, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, M.; Guo, Q. Assessment of vegetation change on the Mongolian Plateau over three decades using different remote sensing products. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 317, 115509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Luo, M.; Meng, F.; Sa, C.; Duan, Y.; Bao, Y.; Liu, T.; De Maeyer, P. Response of vegetation phenology to soil moisture dynamics in the Mongolian Plateau. Catena 2021, 206, 105505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, X.; Xiao, J.; He, B.; Altaf Arain, M.; Beringer, J.; Desai, A.R.; Emmel, C.; Hollinger, D.Y.; Krasnova, A.; Mammarella, I.; et al. Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence is strongly correlated with terrestrial photosynthesis for a wide variety of biomes: First global analysis based on OCO-2 and flux tower observations. Glob. Change Biol. 2018, 24, 3990–4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Golkar, F.; Mousavi, S.M. Variation of XCO2 anomaly patterns in the Middle East from OCO-2 satellite data. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2022, 15, 1219–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bai, Y.; Liu, M.; Guo, Q.; Wu, G.; Wang, W.; Li, S. Diverse responses of gross primary production and leaf area index to drought on the Mongolian Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 902, 166507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yilmaz, M. Accuracy assessment of temperature trends from ERA5 and ERA5-Land. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 856, 159182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Saunders, K.M.; Roberts, S.J.; Perren, B.; Butz, C.; Sime, L.; Davies, S.; Van Nieuwenhuyze, W.; Grosjean, M.; Hodgson, D.A. Holocene dynamics of the Southern Hemisphere westerly winds and possible links to CO2 outgassing. Nat. Geosci. 2018, 11, 650–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mulungu, D.M.M.; Mukama, E. Evaluation and modelling of accuracy of satellite-based CHIRPS rainfall data in Ruvu subbasin, Tanzania. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2023, 9, 1287–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Oda, T.; Maksyutov, S.; Andres, R.J. The Open-source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic CO2, version 2016 (ODIAC2016): A global monthly fossil fuel CO2 gridded emissions data product for tracer transport simulations and surface flux inversions. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2018, 10, 87–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Golkar, F.; Shirvani, A. Spatial and temporal distribution and seasonal prediction of satellite measurement of CO2 concentration over Iran. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2020, 41, 8891–8909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gao, W.; Ding, Z.; Lu, J.; Wan, Y. Low-carbon information quality dimensions and random forest algorithm evaluation model in digital marketing. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 22416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ho, V.H.; Morita, H.; Bachofer, F.; Ho, T.H. Random forest regression kriging modeling for soil organic carbon density estimation using multi-source environmental data in central Vietnamese forests. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2024, 10, 7137–7158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, C. Random forest analysis of factors affecting urban carbon emissions in cities within the Yangtze River Economic Belt. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0252337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, J.; Hu, R.; Chen, L.; Liao, Z.; Che, L.; Li, T. Multi-sensor integrated mapping of global XCO2 from 2015 to 2021 with a local random forest model. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2024, 208, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Elevation map of the Mongolian Plateau.
Figure 1. Elevation map of the Mongolian Plateau.
Atmosphere 16 00560 g001
Figure 2. Spatial results of monthly average of fossil fuel combustion emissions on the Mongolian Plateau from 2018 to 2022.
Figure 2. Spatial results of monthly average of fossil fuel combustion emissions on the Mongolian Plateau from 2018 to 2022.
Atmosphere 16 00560 g002
Figure 3. Statistical results of average monthly emissions from fossil fuel combustion on the Mongolian Plateau from 2018 to 2022.
Figure 3. Statistical results of average monthly emissions from fossil fuel combustion on the Mongolian Plateau from 2018 to 2022.
Atmosphere 16 00560 g003
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of XCO2 over the Mongolian Plateau, based on the long-term (2018–2022) monthly average.
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of XCO2 over the Mongolian Plateau, based on the long-term (2018–2022) monthly average.
Atmosphere 16 00560 g004
Figure 5. Seasonal distribution of XCO2 on the Mongolian Platea from 2018 to 2022 in (a) spring, (b) summer, (c) autumn, and (d) winter.
Figure 5. Seasonal distribution of XCO2 on the Mongolian Platea from 2018 to 2022 in (a) spring, (b) summer, (c) autumn, and (d) winter.
Atmosphere 16 00560 g005
Figure 6. Spatial distribution of the correlations between influencing factors and XCO2 on the Mongolian Plateau from 2018 to 2022. (a) Correlation between NDVI and XCO2; (b) Correlation between PRE and XCO2; (c) Correlation between TEMP and XCO2.
Figure 6. Spatial distribution of the correlations between influencing factors and XCO2 on the Mongolian Plateau from 2018 to 2022. (a) Correlation between NDVI and XCO2; (b) Correlation between PRE and XCO2; (c) Correlation between TEMP and XCO2.
Atmosphere 16 00560 g006
Figure 7. Correlation matrix of environmental variables from 2018 to 2022.
Figure 7. Correlation matrix of environmental variables from 2018 to 2022.
Atmosphere 16 00560 g007
Figure 8. Wind field distribution on the Mongolian Plateau in 2018.
Figure 8. Wind field distribution on the Mongolian Plateau in 2018.
Atmosphere 16 00560 g008
Figure 9. Pearson correlation analysis between XCO2 and wind components (U and V) over the Mongolian Plateau from 2018 to 2022.
Figure 9. Pearson correlation analysis between XCO2 and wind components (U and V) over the Mongolian Plateau from 2018 to 2022.
Atmosphere 16 00560 g009
Figure 10. Contribution rate of different influencing factors on XCO2 on the Mongolian Plateau from 2018 to 2022.
Figure 10. Contribution rate of different influencing factors on XCO2 on the Mongolian Plateau from 2018 to 2022.
Atmosphere 16 00560 g010
Figure 11. Contribution rate of interactive factors on XCO2 on Mongolian Plateau from 2018 to 2022.
Figure 11. Contribution rate of interactive factors on XCO2 on Mongolian Plateau from 2018 to 2022.
Atmosphere 16 00560 g011
Table 1. Summary of data used in this study, including source and spatiotemporal resolution.
Table 1. Summary of data used in this study, including source and spatiotemporal resolution.
Data NameData SourceSpatiotemporal Resolution
Atmospheric CO2 column concentration OCO-2 Satellite Observation Data16-day/1.29 × 2.25 km
Normalized difference vegetation indexMODIS/MOD13A316-day/1 km
Temperature and precipitationERA5-LANDHourly/0.1° × 0.1°
Wind direction and wind speedERA5-LANDHourly/0.1° × 0.1°
PrecipitationCHIRPSDaily/0.05° × 0.05°
Fossil fuel combustion emissionsODIACMonthly/1 km
Digital Elevation ModelShuttle Radar Topography MissionYear/30 m
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

A, Y.; Bao, Z.; Tong, S.; Bao, Y.; Dalantai, S.; Natsagdorj, B.; Fan, X. Spatiotemporal Characteristic of XCO2 and Its Changing Contribution Rate from Different Influencing Indicators in Mongolian Plateau of Central Asia. Atmosphere 2025, 16, 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050560

AMA Style

A Y, Bao Z, Tong S, Bao Y, Dalantai S, Natsagdorj B, Fan X. Spatiotemporal Characteristic of XCO2 and Its Changing Contribution Rate from Different Influencing Indicators in Mongolian Plateau of Central Asia. Atmosphere. 2025; 16(5):560. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050560

Chicago/Turabian Style

A, Yunga, Zhengyi Bao, Siqin Tong, Yuhai Bao, Sainbayar Dalantai, Boldbaatar Natsagdorj, and Xinle Fan. 2025. "Spatiotemporal Characteristic of XCO2 and Its Changing Contribution Rate from Different Influencing Indicators in Mongolian Plateau of Central Asia" Atmosphere 16, no. 5: 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050560

APA Style

A, Y., Bao, Z., Tong, S., Bao, Y., Dalantai, S., Natsagdorj, B., & Fan, X. (2025). Spatiotemporal Characteristic of XCO2 and Its Changing Contribution Rate from Different Influencing Indicators in Mongolian Plateau of Central Asia. Atmosphere, 16(5), 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050560

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop