Next Article in Journal
A Proxy Model for Traffic Related Air Pollution Indicators Based on Traffic Count
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Monitoring in Uranium Deposit and Indoor Radon Survey in Settlements Located near Uranium Mining Area, South Kazakhstan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spatiotemporal Patterns and Regional Transport Contributions of Air Pollutants in Wuxi City

Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Carbon Source and Sink, China Meteorological Administration, Wuxi University, Wuxi 214105, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2025, 16(5), 537; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050537
Submission received: 4 April 2025 / Revised: 28 April 2025 / Accepted: 29 April 2025 / Published: 1 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Air Quality and Health)

Abstract

:
In recent years, with the rapid socioeconomic development of Wuxi City, the frequent occurrence of severe air pollution events has attracted widespread attention from both the local government and the public. Based on the real-time monitoring data of criteria pollutants and GDAS (Global Data Assimilation System) reanalysis data, the spatiotemporal variation patterns, meteorological influences, and potential sources of major air pollutants in Wuxi across different seasons during 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and 2023 (post-COVID-19 restrictions) are investigated using the Pearson correlation coefficient, potential source contribution function (PSCF), and concentration-weighted trajectory (CWT) models. The results demonstrate that the annual mean PM2.5 concentration in Wuxi decreased significantly from 39.6 μg/m3 in 2019 to 29.3 μg/m3 in 2023, whereas the annual mean 8h O3 concentration remained persistently elevated, with comparable levels of 104.6 μg/m3 and 105.0 μg/m3 in 2019 and 2023, respectively. The O3 and particulate matter (PM) remain the most prominent air pollutants in Wuxi’s ambient air quality. The hourly mass concentrations of criteria pollutants, except O3, exhibited characteristic bimodal distributions, with peak concentrations occurring post-rush hour during morning and evening commute periods. In contrast, O3 displayed a distinct unimodal diurnal pattern, peaking between 15:00 and 16:00 local time. The spatial distribution patterns revealed significantly elevated concentrations of all monitored species, excluding O3, in the central urban zone, compared to the northern Taihu Lake region. The statistical analysis revealed significant correlations among PM concentrations and other air pollutants. Additionally, meteorological parameters exerted substantial influences on pollutant concentrations. The PSCF and CWT analyses revealed distinct seasonal variations in the potential source regions of atmospheric pollutants in Wuxi. In spring, the Suzhou–Wuxi–Changzhou metropolitan cluster and northern Zhejiang Province were identified as significant contributors to PM2.5 and O3 pollution in Wuxi. The potential source regions of O3 are predominantly distributed across the Taihu Lake-rim cities during summer, while the eastern urban agglomeration adjacent to Wuxi serves as major potential source areas for O3 in autumn. In winter, the prevailing northerly winds facilitate southward PM2.5 transport from central-northern Jiangsu, characterized by high emissions (e.g., industrial activities), identifying this region as a key potential source contribution area for Wuxi’s aerosol pollution. The current air pollution status in Wuxi City underscores the imperative for implementing more stringent and efficacious intervention strategies to ameliorate air quality.

1. Introduction

The issue of atmospheric pollution in China has received considerable academic attention, driven by rapid economic growth, industrialization, and urbanization [1,2]. Empirical studies demonstrate that air pollution significantly undermines public health, causing ~1.3 million excess deaths per year, while concurrently incurring gross domestic product (GDP)-related economic costs of 1–8% in China [3,4,5]. To control air pollution, the Chinese government implemented the revised Ambient Air Quality Standards (GB3095-2012) in 2012 (Table S1). This policy mandated real-time monitoring of six criteria pollutants, including inhalable particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and ozone (O3), across all 338 municipal cities. By 2013, China had established a nationwide air quality monitoring network capable of hourly measurements, achieving comprehensive coverage. The enforcement of various pollution control interventions has led to progressive air quality enhancements. Recent years have witnessed sustained improvements in air quality, attributable to the implementation of multiple governance measures [6,7]. The analysis of monitoring data from 366 urban stations across China revealed 13.6–30.5% declines in ambient levels of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, and CO between 2015 and 2017 [6].
The spatiotemporally heterogeneous nature of emission control policies necessitates systematic examination of pollutant dispersion dynamics and driving factors to quantify policy impacts. Van et al. systematically analyzed the decadal (2005–2015) emission trajectories of NOx and SO2 across China, providing a policy-relevant assessment of air quality management efficacy [8]. Hu et al. conducted a comprehensive analysis of the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics and evolving patterns of criteria air pollutants in China’s Yangtze River Delta (YRD) metropolitan cluster between 2006 and 2019 [9]. Recent observations reveal divergent trends in China’s air quality from 2013 to 2017, with particulate matter (PM) levels demonstrating measurable declines, whereas surface O3 concentrations showed statistically significant increases [10]. Li et al. newly identified the persistence of O3 pollution into late winter haze seasons, challenging the conventional understanding of seasonal air pollution patterns [11]. Naeem et al. conducted a comparative analysis of air quality variations in 12 cities across Pakistan, India, China, and Korea before and during the COVID-19 outbreak using satellite remote sensing data [12]. Furthermore, urban air quality is influenced by the coupled effects of multiple factors, including emission sources, meteorological conditions, topographic features, and atmospheric chemical transformations [13,14]. Li et al. demonstrated significant negative correlations between mean pollutant concentrations and daily temperature, precipitation, and relative humidity [15]. Complementing this, Wang et al. identified that persistent weak surface winds, combined with shallow boundary layers, consistently triggered severe pollution episodes [16]. Chemical interactions between pollutant species are well-documented; for example, empirical evidence from Zhang et al. revealed NOx and SO2 not only function as key precursors for PM2.5 through gas-to-particle conversion, but also catalyze heterogeneous reactions during severe haze events [17].
As the primary engine of China’s economic growth, the YRD urban agglomeration continues to face significant atmospheric pollution challenges as a prominent environmental bottleneck in its urbanization process, despite implementing a series of pollution control measures. The persistent issue stems from two key factors, including consistently high energy consumption intensity, with 12,000 metric tons of standard coal per square kilometer in 2021, and sustained rapid growth in vehicle ownership, with an annual growth rate of 8.7% [18,19,20,21]. Moreover, the 2019 Outline of the YRD Integration Development Plan mandates that the YRD region must ensure a continuous reduction in total emissions of major air pollutants and improve regional air quality.
Wuxi, located in the southeastern part of Jiangsu Province, serves as a pivotal central city within the YRD region. It boasts a strategic geographical position and serves as a convergence point for multiple national initiatives. The implementation of rigorous atmospheric pollution control measures constitutes a fundamental determinant for sustaining Wuxi’s socioeconomic progression. To date, comprehensive studies elucidating the spatiotemporal characteristics and key drivers of atmospheric pollution in the Wuxi region remain scarce. To address this research gap, this study has the following research goals: (1) to elucidate the temporal variations and spatial distribution patterns of major atmospheric pollutants during two distinct periods: the pre-COVID-19 year (2019) and the post-COVID-19 restriction year (2023) using temporally resolved regulatory air monitoring observations coupled with Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) reanalysis data; (2) to investigate the interactions among pollutants and their associations with meteorological factors; (3) building upon the backward trajectory, to integrate the potential source contribution function (PSCF) and concentration-weighted trajectory (CWT) analysis to conduct quantitative numerical simulations of significant potential pollution sources affecting atmospheric pollutants across different seasons, aiming to identify the major potential source regions contributing to pollutant transport to Wuxi.
The structure of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 describes the study area and data sources. Section 3 first analyzes the seasonal, monthly, and diurnal variations of pollutants, followed by investigations of the spatial distributions, inter-pollutant relationships, pollutant–meteorology interactions, and potential sources. Finally, Section 4 summarizes the main conclusions. This study aims to provide support for air quality forecasting and pollution control strategies in Wuxi and its surrounding regions.

2. Data and Methodology

2.1. Site and Data Description

Wuxi City is situated in the south of Jiangsu Province and is mainly composed of plains, with scattered low mountains and residual hills, bordering the Yangtze River in the north and Taihu Lake in the south (Figure 1). Wuxi is a central city of the YRD, with an urban area of approximately 4627 km2, a permanent population of 7.5 million, and a total of 2.7 million vehicles. According to the 2023 Statistical Bulletin, the GDP of Wuxi has climbed to 1.55 trillion yuan, ranking 14th in China. Wuxi City belongs to the subtropical humid monsoon climate zone, with southeast winds prevailing in the hot, humid summer and northerly winds prevailing in the cold, dry winter. The mean temperature (T) is up to 17 °C, the wind speed (WS) averages 2 m/s, and the mean relative humidity (RH) is 70%. The surface meteorological parameters, including T, the maximum temperature (Tmax), the minimum temperature (Tmax), WS, RH, and precipitation (Pre), were obtained from Wuxi Meteorological Bureau. The concentrations of PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, CO, and O3 were measured at a 1 h time resolution by the air quality monitoring stations, and corresponding data were downloaded from the Wuxi Environmental Monitoring Center. The 8h O3 represents the maximum moving average concentration of ozone over any consecutive 8 h period. Two years of monitoring data (2019 and 2023) are employed in this study. As illustrated in Figure 1, the eight monitoring sites are Xue Lang (XL, 31.49° N, 120.27° E), Huang Xiang (HL, 31.62° N, 120.28° E), Cao Zhang (CZ, 31.56° N, 120.29° E), Qi Tang (QT, 31.50° N, 120.24° E), Dong Ting (DT, 31.59° N, 120.35° E), Wang Zhuang (WZ, 31.55° N, 120.35° E), Rong Xiang (RX, 31.56° N, 120.25° E), and Yan Qiao (YQ, 31.68° N, 120.30° E). The six criteria pollutant concentrations in Wuxi were calculated as the mean values obtained from the eight sampling sites mentioned above. By averaging the hourly data, the daily, monthly, seasonal, and annual concentrations of criteria pollutants were obtained.

2.2. Methods

The PSCF [22] analysis reflects the probable source region by statistically evaluating 24 h backward trajectories (24 times per day with a 1 h simulation period) combined with pollutant concentration data using conditional probability calculations. The meteorological database was extracted from the GDAS [23]. The selected simulation height of 500 m (mid-boundary layer) ensures the representation of large-scale flow features while reducing ground friction interference. The study domain extends from 24° N to 42° N and from 112° E to 130° E, encompassing over 95% of the total trajectory coverage area. The target region was discretized into 32,400 grid cells with a spatial resolution of 0.1° × 0.1°.
The PSCF is mathematically defined as follows:
P S C F i j = m i j n i j
where PSCFij represents the potential source contribution value for grid cell (i, j), nij represents the total number of trajectory endpoints passing through grid cell (i, j), and mij represents the number of endpoints in grid cell (i, j) associated with polluted trajectories. This study defines trajectories associated with daily average PM2.5 concentrations >35 μg/m3 and 8h O3 concentrations >100 μg/m3 (Grade I standard limits of the Chinese guidelines) as PM2.5-polluted trajectories and O3-polluted trajectories, respectively.
As a conditional probability metric, the PSCF is subject to certain uncertainties. The magnitude of error depends on both the total trajectory residence time and the value of nij. When air masses exhibit brief residence times in a grid cell, or when nij is small, the PSCF results may contain significant errors. To address this limitation, researchers have introduced a weighting function, W(nij), when nij falls below three times the average number of trajectory endpoints per grid cell across the study domain [24,25]. To mitigate potential uncertainties arising from low nij values, we introduced an empirical weighting function, W(nij), defined as follows:
W P S C F i j = m i j n i j × W ( n i j )
where WPSCFij represents the weighted PSCF value for grid cell (i, j). The weighting function W(nij) was set as follows [26,27]:
W ( n i j ) = 1.00 ,     80 < n i j 0.70 ,     20 < n i j 80 0.42 ,     10 < n i j 20 0.05 ,     n i j 10
The PSCF method identifies the spatial distribution of potential pollution sources by calculating the proportion of polluted trajectories in each grid. However, it cannot quantitatively reflect the differences in contribution magnitudes between various source regions. The CWT model is employed to quantitatively evaluate the pollution intensity associated with different air mass pathways by calculating trajectory concentration weights [28]. The specific computational procedure is as follows:
C i j = h = 1 M C h × τ i j h h = 1 M τ i j h × W ( n i j )
where Cij represents the mean concentration weight for grid cell (ij); h denotes the index of the trajectory; M is the total number of trajectories; τijh indicates the residence time of trajectory h in grid (i, j), approximated by the count of trajectory endpoints within the grid; and Ch is the measured pollutant concentration corresponding to trajectory h when passing grid (i, j). Similar to the PSCF method, the CWT analysis incorporates the same weighting function W(nij) to reduce uncertainties in Cij calculations:
W C W T i j = C i j × W ( n i j )
where WCWTij represents the weighted CWT value for grid cell (i, j).
Both PSCF and CWT analysis is run by the MeteoInfo soltware-TrajStat Plugin [29]. The PSCF and CWT models have been important tools for identifying potential source areas of atmospheric pollutants. More information can be found elsewhere [24,25,26,27,28,29,30].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Annual Variation

The COVID-19 pandemic and its subsequent control measures had a profound impact on air quality worldwide. This study compares air pollution levels during two distinct periods: 2019 (pre-COVID-19), representing baseline air quality under normal socioeconomic conditions, and 2023 (post-COVID-19 restrictions), reflecting air quality after China’s full lifting of social control measures.
Statistical analysis was conducted on air pollutant concentrations and the Air Quality Index (AQI) in Wuxi for the years 2019 and 2023. The results indicate that both years had complete datasets with 365 valid days of AQI records. As shown in Table 1, 262 days (71.8% of the total) were classified as “excellent/good” (AQI < 100) in 2019, whilst 301 days (82.5% of the total) reached “excellent/good” standards in 2023. Substandard days (AQI > 100) decreased from 103 days (28.2%) in 2019 to 64 days (17.5%) in 2023. The comparative analysis revealed a consistent improvement pattern in Wuxi’s air quality, with a progressive increase in annual ‘excellent/good’ air quality days and a corresponding reduction in heavily polluted days.
The annual mean PM2.5 (PM10) concentrations in 2019 and 2023 were 39.6 ± 21.7 µg/m3 (71.8 ± 37.2 µg/m3) and 29.3 ± 18.4 µg/m3 (56.3 ± 37.4 µg/m3), respectively (Table 1), exceeding or approaching the Grade II limits of the China Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) (annual mean: 35 µg/m3 for PM2.5 and 70 µg/m3 for PM10) (Table S1). The standard deviation in 2019 was generally higher than that in 2023, likely due to more frequent severe pollution episodes (AQI > 200: 22 days in 2019 vs. 8 days in 2023). Regarding gaseous pollutants, the annual mean concentrations of SO2, NO2, CO, and 8h O3 in Wuxi in 2019 (2023) were 8.3 (7.8), 39.9 (31.6), 0.9 × 103 (0.8 × 103), and 104.6 (105.0) µg/m3, respectively. The statistical analysis revealed significant decreases (p < 0.05) in annual mean concentrations for PM, SO2, NO2, and CO in 2023 relative to the 2019 levels, with O3 being the sole exception. Strengthening legislative and regulatory measures is recommended to further control O3 and PM pollution. In recent years, Wuxi has implemented measures such as clean energy substitution, clean coal technologies, and advanced boiler emission treatment, leading to further improvement in air quality.
Figure 2 presents the proportions of the predominant pollutants in Wuxi during the two study periods. The predominant pollutant is defined as the one with the highest contribution to the Air Quality Index (AQI) when the AQI exceeds 50. The term “Clean” denotes periods when the AQI remains below 50, corresponding to the excellent air quality classification according to CAAQS. During both 2019 and 2023, 8h O3, PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 were the most frequently observed predominant pollution, while neither SO2 nor CO emerged as predominant pollution. Specifically, the proportion of 8h O3 showed a modest increase from 39% in 2019 to 41% in 2023, whereas PM10 levels remained stable. In contrast, PM2.5 exhibited a marked declining trend, decreasing from 19% in 2019 to 7% in 2023. Wuxi maintained relatively low NO2 pollution levels, and further reduced during 2023.

3.2. Temporal Variations

3.2.1. Seasonal and Diurnal Variation

Further analysis was conducted on the seasonal, monthly, and diurnal variation patterns of pollutant concentrations in Wuxi over these two periods, with the results illustrated in Figure 3.
The seasonal variations in PM2.5 and pollution levels in Wuxi during 2019 and 2023 reveal that the highest concentrations occurred in winter, followed by spring and autumn (with spring slightly higher than autumn), while the lowest levels were observed in summer (Table 1). This variation pattern aligns with the seasonal trends of PM2.5 reported in other regions [31,32,33]. The mean PM2.5 mass concentration in winter was more than twice that observed in summer. The highest PM2.5 was recorded in winter 2019, at 56.6 μg/m3, while the lowest was observed in summer 2023, at 17.5 μg/m3. The diurnal variation curve exhibits the most pronounced fluctuations in winter, while the amplitude is the most subdued in summer (Figure 3). This phenomenon can be attributed to the prevalence of stagnant weather conditions during the cold winter, characterized by a stable atmospheric structure and a lower planetary boundary layer height, which facilitate pollutant accumulation [34]. Additionally, pollutants are advected from more polluted areas to monitoring stations by prevailing winter winds, resulting in local air quality degradation. Summer precipitation rises markedly, accumulating up to 441.1 mm in 2019 and 737.9 mm in 2023 (Table 2), respectively. The abundance of hygroscopic particles in the atmosphere enhances the effective dilution and deposition of airborne PM2.5 [35]. Concurrently, intensified solar radiation during summer reduces the probability of temperature inversion formation. The improved atmospheric turbulence, horizontal transport, and vertical diffusion collectively inhibit the accumulation of air pollutants.
The diurnal variation patterns of air pollutants are critically important for elucidating the influences of potential emission sources, including domestic cooking, vehicular traffic, industrial activities, and associated meteorological parameters in urban environments. The diurnal variation of PM2.5 concentrations in Wuxi exhibits a bimodal pattern with dual peaks and dual troughs, showing significant fluctuations during daytime and relatively stable levels at night (Figure 3a). The peak and trough timings of the four seasons vary slightly. The diurnal cycle exhibits a morning peak (9:00–10:00) and an evening peak (21:00–22:00), with daytime (15:00–18:00) and nocturnal (02:00–04:00) troughs. Winter morning peaks lag by 1 h relative to the other seasons. The diurnal variation characteristics of PM2.5 in Wuxi are consistent with other existing studies [31]. The daily fluctuation of PM2.5 mass concentration is primarily influenced by human activities, atmospheric diffusion conditions, photochemical reactions, and traffic emissions. In the early morning, atmospheric stability and frequent temperature inversions lead to weak turbulent diffusion, trapping pollutants near the surface. PM2.5 levels begin to rise from 6:00, peaking around 9:00 due to increased human activity, temperature-driven photochemical reactions, and traffic emissions. In the afternoon, the elevation of the atmospheric boundary layer, enhanced solar radiation, and stronger convective turbulence promote pollutant dispersion and dilution, causing PM2.5 concentrations to decline further, reaching their lowest point around 17:00. Subsequently, with increased emissions from evening rush-hour activities, combined with atmospheric stabilization and weakened turbulent transport, PM2.5 levels rise again, peaking around 21:00.
The mass concentrations of PM10 in Wuxi exhibited distinct seasonal variations, with higher levels observed during spring (79.2 μg/m3 in 2019 vs. 73.1 μg/m3 in 2023) and winter (87.9 μg/m3 in 2019 vs. 70.7 μg/m3 in 2023) compared to summer (46.3 μg/m3 in 2019 vs. 30.4 μg/m3 in 2023) and autumn (74.2 μg/m3 in 2019 vs. 51.0 μg/m3 in 2023). Wuxi is located in the southern part of Jiangsu Province. According to data from online statistics websites [36], the pollutant concentrations in central and northern Jiangsu are higher than those in Wuxi. The prevailing northerly winds during the spring and winter seasons facilitate the long-range transport of dust particles from northern regions to Wuxi. The diurnal variation of PM10 concentrations displayed a bimodal distribution, with peak concentrations occurring during the morning (09:00–11:00) and evening (20:00–22:00) periods, while the lowest values were typically recorded in the afternoon (around 16:00) (Figure 3b).
SO2 and NO2, as gaseous precursors of PM2.5 and serve as characteristic tracers for emission sources from fossil fuel combustion and vehicular activities, providing important insights into PM2.5 sources. The diurnal variation of SO2 concentrations in Wuxi exhibited a unimodal pattern across all seasons, with consistently higher daytime levels compared to nighttime values. Peak concentrations occurred around 10:00, with 13 μg/m3 in 2019 and declining to 9–10 μg/m3 in 2023, indicating persistent daytime SO2 emission sources in the surrounding areas, likely associated with industrial activities requiring fossil fuel combustion (Figure 3c). The moderate elevation in SO2 concentrations after 18:00 during the autumn and winter months likely originates from residential heating activities, particularly domestic coal combustion for space heating. The characteristic winter-maximum pattern in SO2 shows strong temporal coherence with PM mass concentration peaks during winter, demonstrating the substantial contribution of coal-fired heating emissions to particulate pollution.
The diurnal variation of NO2 exhibited a distinct bimodal pattern, with morning (08:00) and evening (20:00) peaks, occurring approximately 1–2 h earlier than the corresponding PM2.5 mass concentration maxima (Figure 3d), which implicates traffic-related emissions as a dominant contributor to PM2.5 in Wuxi, with vehicular exhaust representing one of the most significant anthropogenic sources. The diurnal variation pattern of CO mass concentration exhibits similar characteristics to that of NO2 (Figure 3e).
The near-surface O3 concentrations in all four seasons exhibited a unimodal diurnal variation pattern (Figure 3f). This is attributed to the fact that ground-level O3 is a secondary pollutant formed through photochemical reactions involving its precursors, e.g., NOx, CO, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), with solar radiation intensity being the dominant factor driving its diurnal variation [37,38]. During the pre-sunrise period, O3 concentrations exhibited minimal temporal variation, with a gradual declining trend due to weak solar radiation. The morning traffic rush hour led to increased emissions of O3 precursors, which acted as reducing agents and consumed O3, resulting in the daily minimum concentration occurring between 06:00–07:00. Subsequently, as solar radiation intensified, O3 levels progressively increased, peaking between 15:00–16:00. Surface O3 concentrations maintained consistently low levels, with gradual declining trends during pre-dawn hours across all four seasons. NO2 concentrations reach their daily minimum at 15:00, followed by a gradual increase. This pattern further confirms that NO2 is a key participant in O3 formation, as the period between 12:00 and 15:00 represents the optimal window for O3 production. During this time, substantial nitrogen oxides (NOx) engage in photochemical reactions, leading to a significant increase in O3 levels and a corresponding depletion of NO2. The O3 concentrations decrease following sunset in response to diminishing solar radiation intensity and declining temperatures, with this phenomenon being particularly pronounced during nighttime hours in the cold season.
Significant seasonal variations were observed for criteria air pollutants in 2019, with winter concentrations of PM2.5, PM10, NO2, CO, and SO2 exhibiting higher levels compared to other seasons, highlighting particularly severe winter pollution episodes. By 2023, overall reductions were observed in ambient concentrations of PM2.5, PM10, NO2, CO, and SO2, primarily attributable to a suite of air quality control policies implemented by municipal authorities. Maximum 8h O3 concentrations were observed during summer in both 2019 and 2023. Of particular significance is the minimal difference (merely 5 µg/m3) between spring and summer concentrations in 2023. Despite overall pollutant reductions, O3 concentrations in 2023 remained statistically indistinguishable from the 2019 levels, reflecting counterbalancing influences from persistent local anthropogenic emissions and/or enhanced regional transport effects.
Additionally, the proportions of predominant pollutants exhibited significant seasonal variations (Figure 2). During spring, O3 and PM10 were the dominant pollutants, accounting for 42% and 22% in 2019 and 53% and 26% in 2023, respectively. During summer, O3 contributed to over 70% of pollution, making it the most frequently dominant pollutant. During autumn, O3 and PM10 were the predominant pollutants in 2019, with contributions of 40% and 23%, respectively. However, in 2023, only O3 remained dominant (43%), while PM10’s contribution declined significantly to 5%. By contrast, during winter, PM2.5 and NO2 were the predominant pollutants, contributing 56% and 20% in 2019, and 24% and 20% in 2023, respectively. O3 and PM are the main factors causing air pollution in Wuxi.

3.2.2. Monthly Variation

A consistent U-shaped monthly trend was observed across all criteria pollutants, except O3, while the secondary pollutant O3 showed an anti-phase pattern. Taking 2019 as an example, concentrations of PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, and CO peaked during the cold months, reaching 60.7 μg/m3 (January), 99.1 μg/m3 (January), 10.7 μg/m3 (January), 57.1 μg/m3 (December), and 1.14 mg/m3 (January), respectively. During the warm months, these pollutants reached their lowest levels: 22.1 μg/m3 for PM2.5 (August), 41.2 μg/m3 for PM10 (August), 6.3 μg/m3 for SO2 (June), 23.9 μg/m3 for NO2 (August), and 0.7 mg/m3 for CO (July). The 8h O3 concentrations peaked in June at 151.8 μg/m3. During summer, the average regional temperature gradually increased to 27–28 °C (Table 2), accompanied by extended sunlight duration. These conditions enhanced photochemical reaction rates in the atmosphere, consequently promoting O3 formation and accumulation. Statistical analysis revealed a modest negative correlation (r = −0.20), between daily precipitation amounts and O3 levels, suggesting limited precipitation-mediated O3 suppression in this region (detailed in Section 3.4). Maximum 8h O3 concentrations in Wuxi peaked on Sundays (110.5 μg/m3) and reached minimum levels on Tuesdays (98.9 μg/m3). This phenomenon primarily results from the ‘O3 weekend effect’ and lower NOx emissions [39,40,41].
In brief, compared with 2019, Wuxi made some progress in overall air quality by 2023. However, several issues remain in air pollution control. This is primarily reflected in the fact that the major pollutants in Wuxi have gradually shifted from particulate matter to O3, demonstrating that the measures implemented in Wuxi, including construction dust management, the promotion of new energy vehicles, and the regulation of heavy-duty diesel trucks, have shown preliminary effectiveness in mitigating particulate matter pollution.

3.3. Spatial Distribution

Table 3 summarizes the detailed average concentrations of ambient pollutants at different monitoring sites in 2023. The highest daily mean PM concentrations were recorded at the DT (PM2.5: 13.5 μg/m3) and HX (PM10: 65.3 μg/m3) monitoring sites, while the XL and QT sites exhibited the peak 8h O3 concentrations, with 110.3 μg/m3 and 109.3 μg/m3, respectively. The HX site registered the highest NO2 levels (39.8 μg/m3), whereas the SO2 and CO concentrations remained relatively consistent across all eight monitoring sites. The monitoring sites exhibited distinct spatial distribution characteristics due to variations in emission sources. The frequencies of O3 and PM exceeding the Grade II CAAQS were significantly higher than those of other pollutants, indicating that atmospheric pollution in this region was primarily driven by O3 and PM exceedances.
Overall, the urban district sites (HX, CZ, DT, WZ, and YQ) exhibited the highest pollution levels, whereas the north shore of Taihu Lake (XL, QT, and RX) recorded the cleanest air. This spatial pattern can be attributed to several factors, such as higher population density in urban areas, more intensive activities (e.g., vehicular traffic, construction projects, and catering services), and significant fugitive dust emissions, collectively leading to elevated anthropogenic emissions of PM and NO2 (PM2.5: 29.0–30.8 μg/m3, PM10: 55.8−65.3 μg/m3, NO2: 31.9−39.8 μg/m3). In contrast, the urban center exhibited lower 8h O3 concentrations, particularly 101.2 μg/m3 in CZ. Furthermore, the northern shore of Taihu Lake in Wuxi is characterized by elevated moisture levels and reduced anthropogenic emission compared to urban core areas. The favorable topographic conditions further enhance atmospheric dispersion in this region, consequently leading to a corresponding reduction in the pollutant concentrations (PM2.5: 27.0−28.3 μg/m3, PM10: 49.8−54.9 μg/m3, NO2: 24.6−25.9 μg/m3). The predominance of biogenic VOC emissions from substantial vegetation cover constitutes the major driver of observed O3 elevation (107.0−110.3 μg/m3) in the northern Taihu Lake basin.

3.4. Correlations Between Air Pollutants and Meteorological Factors

Based on the preceding analysis, except for O3, the concentrations of various pollutants in Wuxi exhibit similar temporal trends, suggesting intrinsic relationships among them. This study quantified inter-pollutant relationships using Pearson correlation coefficient (r) analysis, with the resultant correlation matrix presented in Table 4.
PM2.5 and PM10 demonstrated a highly significant positive correlation, with a coefficient of 0.86. Concurrently, PM exhibited strong positive correlations with SO2, NO2, and CO. The key contributing factors to these relationships include the following aspects: Firstly, SO2 undergoes atmospheric oxidation to form sulfate aerosols (SO42−), which serve as critical precursor species in PM nucleation and growth processes. Secondly, the NO2 accumulated in the near-surface atmospheric boundary layer participates in photochemical chain reactions, yielding nitrate compounds (NO3) that constitute a major fraction of secondary aerosols. Thirdly, CO predominantly originates from combustion-derived emissions, e.g., vehicular exhaust and industrial flue gases, which are inherently associated with concomitant PM emissions. Furthermore, SO2 and NO2 exhibit a strong correlation (r = 0.63), attributable to their shared emission sources and concurrent atmospheric removal processes in Wuxi. The observed correlations between CO and SO2/NO2/PM arise from their co-emission characteristics during fossil fuel combustion processes. Specifically, while CO primarily originates from incomplete combustion in power plants, industrial facilities, and vehicular engines, these same emission sources simultaneously release SO2, NO2, and PM, resulting in consistent atmospheric covariation patterns. The correlation between CO and PM2.5 (r = 0.80) was significantly stronger than that between CO and PM10 (r = 0.62), indicating that CO emission processes are more closely associated with fine particulate matter emissions.
O3, as a secondary atmospheric pollutant, exhibits complex formation dynamics wherein NO2 and CO serve as essential precursors [42]. The observed moderate negative correlations (r = −0.25 for NO2-O3; r = −0.24 for CO-O3) reflect the non-linear photochemical processes governing O3 production. While O3 formation is fundamentally dependent on NOx and CO concentrations through the Chapman cycle and hydrocarbon oxidation pathways, its net production is substantially modulated by multiple environmental variables: solar irradiance intensity, which regulates photolysis rates; ambient temperature, which influences reaction kinetics; relative humidity, which affects radical chemistry; and aerosol loading, which alters heterogeneous reaction pathways. Consequently, these competing physicochemical mechanisms result in non-stationary precursor–O3 relationships that cannot be adequately characterized by simple correlation metrics alone.
Atmospheric environments exhibit significant regional characteristics, with local meteorological conditions substantially influencing ambient pollutant concentrations. Table 4 presents the statistical relationships between atmospheric pollutants and key meteorological parameters, including Tmax, Tmin, T, RH, WS, and Pre, in Wuxi City.
Temperature demonstrated moderate negative correlations with PM2.5 (r = −0.49), PM10 (r = −0.41), SO2 (r = −0.32), NO2 (r = −0.49), and CO (r = −0.46). Elevated temperatures enhance vertical convective mixing, promoting efficient pollutant dispersion through increased boundary layer height and improved ventilation coefficients. Conversely, thermal inversion layers frequently form under low-temperature conditions, characterized by suppressed atmospheric turbulence and reduced mixing depth, which collectively inhibit vertical pollutant transport and facilitate the accumulation of primary and secondary species in the surface layer.
Elevated temperatures exert a positive forcing effect on photochemical processes, leading to increased O3 concentrations, as evidenced by their strong positive correlation (r = 0.65). Under conditions of stable local emissions, WS serves as the dominant regulator of atmospheric pollutant dispersion dynamics. Low WS facilitates atmospheric pollutant accumulation, while stronger winds promote effective dispersion. All measured pollutants, except O3, exhibited moderate negative correlations with WS (r = −0.33 for PM2.5-WS; r = −0.30 for PM10-WS; r = −0.34 for SO2-WS; r = −0.50 for NO2-WS; r = −0.38 for CO-WS).
Wuxi’s dense hydrographic network and persistently high atmospheric humidity (70.5% for 2019 vs. 72.1% for 2023) facilitated enhanced pollutant removal. Relative humidity exhibited the strongest correlation with SO2 concentrations (r = 0.51) among all meteorological factors. This observed relationship can be attributed to enhanced aqueous-phase partitioning of SO2 under high-humidity conditions: increased atmospheric water vapor promotes the dissolution and subsequent oxidation of SO2 to form sulfate aerosols (SO42−), thereby reducing gaseous SO2 concentrations through phase transition. The negative correlations between PM and RH primarily result from the hygroscopic growth and subsequent wet deposition of aerosols. Atmospheric water droplets exhibit stronger adsorption effects on larger particulate matter than on smaller particles. Consequently, the size-selective removal process leads to a more pronounced humidity-mediated depletion of PM10 (r = −0.34) relative to PM2.5 (r = −0.08). High-humidity conditions promote O3 depletion through aqueous-phase reactions, resulting in a significant negative correlation between RH and O3 concentrations (r = −0.45). Moreover, precipitation demonstrated weak to moderate negative correlations with all measured pollutants (r = −0.31 to −0.04). This reflects precipitation’s dual role in atmospheric cleansing: direct wet deposition of PM and soluble gases through below-cloud scavenging processes and indirect modulation of pollution concentrations via humidity modification, as evidenced by the significant positive correlation between precipitation and relative humidity (r = 0.42).

3.5. Pollutants Source Analysis Based on PSCF and CWT

As shown in the seasonal analysis of criteria pollutants in Figure 2, O3, PM2.5, and PM10 were the most frequently observed dominant pollutants. Compared to PM10, PM2.5 exhibits smaller particle sizes, rendering it more susceptible to regional transport via air masses. To further investigate the potential source regions of major pollutants in Wuxi City, we calculated the WPSCF for PM2.5 and 8h O3, respectively (Figure 4 and Figure 5). The potential source simulation point was set in urban Wuxi (31.59° N, 120.35° E, elevation: 4 m), with the trajectory starting height set at 500 m above ground level. The 24 h backward trajectory calculation was primarily designed to focus the study area on the YRD regional joint prevention and control zone.
During the spring of 2019, the high-value potential source areas of PM2.5 (WPSCF > 0.6) were mainly concentrated in urban Wuxi, east of Changzhou, and southeast Zhenjiang (Figure 4a). Additionally, some high-value areas were distributed in northwestern Suzhou. The sub-high-value areas (WPSCF > 0.5) expanded to cover most of Zhenjiang, Changzhou, and Suzhou in Jiangsu Province, as well as southeastern Nanjing and parts of Huzhou, Jiaxing, and Ningbo in Zhejiang Province, and Xuancheng in Anhui Province. As the PM2.5 concentration decreased from 41.5 μg/m3 during the spring of 2019 to 30.6 μg/m3 in 2023, the corresponding WPSCF values during the spring of 2023 dropped below 0.4 (Figure 4e). The potential source areas were primarily localized in Wuxi and its surrounding regions, indicating that PM2.5 pollution was dominated by local accumulation. Local emission control should be prioritized in spring, along with joint prevention and control measures with neighboring cities.
Summer exhibited the best air quality throughout the year, with mean PM2.5 concentrations of 26.3 μg/m3 in 2019 and 17.5 μg/m3 in 2023, respectively. Unlike the spatial patterns observed in spring, no significant high-value zones (WPSCF > 0.5) were detected (Figure 4b,f), as the WPSCF values predominantly remained below 0.5 in 2019 and 0.3 in 2023. These results indicate minimal influence from transboundary particulate matter transport, highlighting the dominance of local meteorological conditions, e.g., enhanced dispersion and precipitation in reducing pollution levels.
In autumn 2019, the high-value potential source areas (WPSCF > 0.6) primarily clustered in central Wuxi, parts of Suzhou, and northern Jiaxing (Figure 4c). The sub-high-value regions (WPSCF > 0.5) showed a concentric distribution adjacent to the WPSCF > 0.6 source regions, extending to southwestern Suzhou and the border area between Zhenjiang and Changzhou, with minor distributions in Taizhou and Yancheng. The autumn 2023 data revealed a contraction of zones with WPSCF > 0.6 to localized areas, concurrent with the PM2.5 concentration reduction from 34.2 to 27.5 μg/m3 (Figure 4g). Spatial analysis indicates that high-PSCF regions during autumn were principally confined to local and proximate areas, mirroring the spring distribution pattern. This spatial consistency underscores the imperative for intensified local emission controls, and cross-jurisdictional air quality management initiatives with bordering municipalities.
Winter exhibited the highest PM2.5 concentrations, with mean values reaching 56.6 μg/m3 (41.6 μg/m3) in 2019 (2023), demonstrating greater influence from regional transport (Figure 4d,h). The WPSCF values > 0.6 in winter (2019) were primarily distributed in local Wuxi, Changzhou, eastern Zhenjiang, southern Nanjing, southern Taizhou, and southwestern Suzhou. Notably, Wuxi, Taizhou, and Changzhou exhibited even higher WPSCF values exceeding 0.7. The PM2.5 concentrations in Taizhou and Changzhou reached 64.2 μg/m3 and 66.7 μg/m3 during winter in 2019 [36], significantly exceeding the level observed in Wuxi (56.6 μg/m3). This substantial disparity highlights the non-negligible influence of regional transport on local air quality. The WPSCF > 0.5 areas were predominantly distributed around the high-value zones, extending to encompass the municipal areas of Nantong, Yancheng, and Yangzhou in Jiangsu Province, along with the north of Zhejiang Province. Wuxi predominantly experiences northerly winds in cold winter, while the central-northern Jiangsu urban cluster exhibits elevated PM2.5 concentrations, resulting in significant transport impacts on Wuxi’s air quality. These findings highlight the imperative for Wuxi to both intensify local emission controls and enhance coordinated air quality management with upwind cities in central-northern Jiangsu Province.
The annual average 8h O3 concentrations in 2019 and 2023 were approximately equal. Excluding summer, the 8h O3 concentrations in spring, autumn, and winter of 2023 were all higher than those during the corresponding seasons of 2019, indicating that Wuxi’s joint prevention and control measures for O3 pollution need further strengthening. The 24 h potential source regions of O3 were predominantly concentrated within a 200 km radius of Wuxi.
The regions with WPSCF values > 0.7 for O3 during spring were primarily clustered in the Wuxi metropolitan area (Figure 5a,e). Among the four seasons, summer exhibited higher WPSCF values, indicating stronger influence from regional transport (Figure 5b,f). The PSCF > 0.6 region encompassed southern Jiangsu (e.g., Suzhou, Changzhou, Zhenjiang, and Nanjing), northern Zhejiang (e.g., Huzhou and Jiaxing), and Shanghai. The high-value areas displayed a southeastward spatial trend, paralleling the dominant summer wind vectors. The air masses passing through these high-emission regions transported substantial amounts of O3 precursors, which were subsequently converted to O3 through photochemical reactions, significantly impacting downwind areas. The spatial distribution of high WPSCF values showed good consistency with Pang et al.’s conclusion that the O3 high-emission areas of YRD were primarily concentrated in economically developed cities along the Yangtze River [43]. The autumn WPSCF pattern (values > 0.6) delineated a distinct eastern transport corridor encompassing Suzhou, Nantong, Shanghai, and Jiaxing (Figure 5c,g). In contrast, winter exhibited minimal regional transport influence on O3 concentrations, as evidenced by WPSCF values below 0.2 (Figure 5d,h).
To further validate the PSCF analysis results, Figure 6 and Figure 7 present the CWT analysis, which quantitatively assesses the pollution potential of source regions. The spatial distributions of potential source regions identified by concentration contributions and weighting factors showed strong consistency, both indicating that the predominant high-value zones were concentrated in local Wuxi and adjacent areas. Achieving compliance for PM and O3 pollution standards demands focused local interventions, supported by regional emission coordination.
The high-concentration zones for PM2.5 in spring (WCWT > 40 μg/m3) exhibited spatial congruence with elevated WPSCF areas, collectively identifying Wuxi local sources, Zhenjiang, Changzhou, and Suzhou as dominant potential source regions (Figure 6a,e). During summer, the WCWT values generally remained below 30 μg/m3 (Figure 6b,f), indicating consistently low PM2.5 concentrations throughout the area. The spatial distributions of autumn WCWT hotspots (WCWT > 40 μg/m3) demonstrated strong agreement with elevated WPSCF regions (Figure 6c,f), jointly identifying local Wuxi and southern Jiaxing as dominant potential source areas for PM2.5. Subsidiary WCWT hotspots (>30 μg/m3) showed concentrated distribution across the Changzhou–Zhenjiang urban corridor, parts of Suzhou, and Taizhou.
The distribution range of WCWT is significantly larger in winter than in other seasons (Figure 6d,h). The high-value areas (WCWT > 60 μg/m3) are mainly distributed in northern Wuxi, Changzhou, and the border regions of Suzhou and Zhenjiang. The sub-high regions (WCWT > 35 μg/m3) are primarily located in the urban area of Wuxi, eastern Zhenjiang, most of Changzhou, parts of Taizhou, Yangzhou, Yancheng, and Nantong, indicating that PM2.5 in Wuxi during winter is significantly influenced by transport from cities in the central and northern regions of Jiangsu Province.
A comparison of the WCWT distributions of O3 across the four seasons reveals that the contribution of surrounding regions to O3 levels is higher in summer than in other seasons (Figure 7b,f). In spring, regions with WCWT values of 8h O3 > 100 μg/m3 are primarily concentrated in southern Wuxi and a small northwestern portion of Zhejiang Province (Figure 7a,e). The high-WCWT regions (8h O3 > 100 μg/m3) during autumn demonstrated perfect spatial concordance with elevated WPSCF areas (>0.6), mainly located in the eastern part of Wuxi (Figure 7c,g). In winter, O3 pollution remained relatively subdued, with all WCWT values below 70 μg/m3 (Figure 7d,h). Our findings highlight the considerable role of intercity transport from the Taihu Lake-rim urban agglomeration in exacerbating Wuxi’s O3 pollution, underscoring the urgency of coordinated emission controls on O3 precursors, such as VOCs and NOx, across this industrialized zone.
In brief, the source apportionment results reveal pronounced seasonal variability. To mitigate the effects of cross-boundary transport, comprehensive joint prevention and control mechanisms for air pollution should be established and rigorously enforced in the Wuxi region.

4. Conclusions

This study conducted the first statistical analysis of ambient air quality data in Wuxi City for the years 2019 (pre-pandemic) and 2023 (after the full lifting of COVID-19 restrictions). The spatiotemporal variation trends of atmospheric pollutant concentrations, the correlations among different pollutants, the relationships between pollutants and meteorological factors, as well as the potential source regions of pollutants were examined. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1)
The exceedances of O3 and PM concentrations occurred with significantly higher frequency compared to other pollutants, marking them as the dominant contaminants. SO2 and CO concentrations never exceeded national standards throughout the study period. Compared with 2019, a 26% reduction in PM2.5 concentrations was observed in 2023, decreasing from 39.6 μg/m3 to 29.3 μg/m3. However, 8h O3 pollution exhibited no significant improvement, remaining at persistently elevated levels (104.6 μg/m3 in 2019 vs. 105.0 μg/m3 in 2023).
(2)
The diurnal profiles of criteria pollutants, except O3, exhibited consistent bimodal concentration patterns. Winter demonstrated significantly greater amplitude in mass concentration fluctuations relative to other seasons. NO2 concentrations peaked during morning and evening traffic rush hours, consistent with vehicular emission patterns. PM exhibited delayed peak occurrences, lagging NO2 by 1–2 h, suggesting secondary aerosol formation processes. SO2 displayed a unimodal distribution. O3 also demonstrated a distinct single-peak diurnal profile, reaching maximal values during mid-afternoon, with summer exhibiting highest peak amplitudes compared to other seasons.
(3)
From the spatial distribution pattern of air pollutants, it can be observed that in Wuxi’s central urban area, the mass concentrations of PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 are relatively high, while O3 concentrations are relatively low. In contrast, monitoring sites near the northern shore of Taihu Lake exhibit lower PM concentrations but higher O3 levels. Additionally, O3 demonstrates a weekend effect.
(4)
Correlation analysis indicates that PM concentrations exhibit significant correlations with other air pollutants. Temperature demonstrated moderate negative correlations with PM and NO2, while exhibiting a strong positive correlation with O3. Both wind speed and precipitation showed weak to moderate negative correlations with pollutant concentrations. Relative humidity displayed a particularly strong negative correlation with SO2, along with moderate negative correlations with PM10 and O3.
(5)
PSCF and CWT analyses showed high consistency in identifying major potential source regions. In spring, the dominant potential source regions of O3 and PM2.5 in Wuxi were concentrated in the Suzhou–Wuxi–Changzhou metropolitan area, southern Nanjing, Zhenjiang, and northern Zhejiang Province. During summer, high-potential source areas of O3 were mainly distributed around Taihu Lake, including Changzhou, Wuxi, Suzhou, and Huzhou, while southeastern cities such as Jiaxing, Ningbo, Huzhou, and Shanghai also contributed to O3 pollution transport in Wuxi. In autumn, the dominant potential sources of O3 were located in the eastern part of Wuxi. In winter, the major source regions of PM2.5 originated from central and northern Jiangsu Province.
By integrating multi-source observational data with model simulations, we established a causal framework for complex air pollution in this typical YRD industrial city. The findings provide critical scientific evidence to support regional coordinated air quality management strategies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/atmos16050537/s1. Table S1: Concentration limits for criteria air pollutants in ambient air according to the China Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS, GB3095-2012) [44].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, resources, visualization, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, M.M.; data curation, Y.Z. and X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the General Project of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, Ministry of Education (24YJCZH211), the Jiangsu Qinglan Project, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Carbon Source and Sink, China Meteorological Administration (ECSS-CMA202312), and the Wuxi Association for Science and Technology Soft Science Research Project (KX-24-B31).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Wuxi Environmental Monitoring Center Station and Wuxi Meteorological Bureau for their support during the monitoring campaign.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, R.; Cui, L.; Li, J.; Zhao, A.; Fu, H.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Kong, L.; Chen, J. Spatial and temporal variation of particulate matter and gaseous pollutants in China during 2014–2016. Atmos. Environ. 2017, 161, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Song, C.; Wu, L.; Xie, Y.; He, J.; Chen, X.; Wang, T.; Lin, Y.; Jin, T.; Wang, A.; Liu, Y.; et al. Air pollution in China: Status and spatiotemporal variations. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 227, 334–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lelieveld, J.; Evans, J.; Fnais, M.; Giannadaki, D.; Pozzer, A. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 2015, 525, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sun, Z.; Yang, L.; Bai, X.; Du, W.; Shen, G.; Fei, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, A.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, M. Maternal ambient air pollution exposure with spatial-temporal variations and preterm birth risk assessment during 2013–2017 in Zhejiang Province, China. Environ. Int. 2020, 133, 105242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mao, M.; Zhang, X.; Yin, Y. Particulate matter and gaseous pollutions in three metropolises along the Chinese Yangtze River: Situation and Implications. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guo, X.R.; Wu, H.K.; Chen, D.S.; Ye, Z.L.; Shen, Y.Q.; Liu, J.F.; Cheng, S.Y. Estimation and prediction of pollutant emissions from agricultural and construction diesel machinery in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region, China. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 260, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ma, X.; Jia, H.; Sha, T.; An, J.; Tian, R. Spatial and seasonal characteristics of particulate matter and gaseous pollution in China: Implications for control policy. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 248, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Van der A, R.J.; Mijling, B.; Ding, J.; Koukouli, M.E.; Liu, F.; Li, Q.; Mao, H.; Theys, N. Cleaning up the air: Efectiveness of air quality policy for SO2 and NOx emissions in China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017, 17, 1775–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hu, M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Jiao, M.; Huang, G.; Xia, B. Spatialtemporal heterogeneity of air pollution and its relationship with meteorological factors in the Pearl River Delta China. Atmos. Environ. 2021, 254, 118415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Tong, D.; Shao, M.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, X.; Wang, J.; He, H.; Liu, W.; et al. Drivers of improved PM2.5 air quality in China from 2013 to 2017. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 24463–24469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, K.; Jacob, D.J.; Liao, H.; Qiu, Y.; Shen, L.; Zhai, S.; Bates, K.H.; Sulprizio, M.P.; Song, S.; Lu, X.; et al. Ozone pollution in the North China Plain spreading into the late-winter haze season. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2015797118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Naeem, W.; Kim, J.; Lee, Y.G. Spatiotemporal variations in the air pollutant NO2 in some regions of Pakistan, India, China, and Korea, before and after COVID-19, based on ozone monitoring instrument data. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Graham, F.F.; Kim, A.H.M.; Baker, M.G.; Fyfe, C.; Hales, S. Associations between meteorological factors, air pollution and Legionnaires’ disease in New Zealand: Time series analysis. Atmos. Environ. 2023, 296, 119572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Baltaci, H.; Akkoyunlu, B.O.; Arslan, H.; Yetemen, O.; Ozdemir, E.T. The infuence of meteorological conditions and atmospheric circulation types on PM10 levels in western Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 191, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, L.; Qian, J.; Ou, C.Q.; Zhou, Y.X.; Guo, C.; Guo, Y. Spatial and temporal analysis of Air Pollution Index and its timescale-dependent relationship with meteorological factors in Guangzhou, China, 2001–2011. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 190, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, X.; Wang, K.; Su, L. Contribution of Atmospheric Difusion Conditions to the Recent Improvement in Air Quality in China. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36404. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang, R.; Wang, G.; Guo, S.; Zamora, M.L.; Ying, Q.; Lin, Y.; Wang, W.; Hu, M.; Wang, Y. Formation of urban fne particulate matter. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 3803–3855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ming, L.L.; Jin, L.; Li, J.; Fu, P.Q.; Yang, W.Y.; Liu, D.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Z.F.; Li, X.D. PM2.5 in the Yangtze River Delta, China: Chemical compositions, seasonal variations, and regional pollution events. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 223, 200–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, G.; Xu, H.; Qi, B.; Du, R.; Gui, K.; Wang, H.; Jiang, W.; Liang, L.; Xu, W. Characterization of atmospheric trace gases and particulate matter in Hangzhou, China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2018, 18, 1705–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, T.; Duan, F.; He, K.; Qin, Y.; Tong, D.; Geng, G.; Liu, X.; Li, H.; Yang, S.; Ye, S.; et al. Air pollution characteristics and their relationship with emissions and meteorology in the Yangtze River Delta region during 2014–2016. J. Environ. Sci. 2019, 83, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, W.; Wu, X.; Ding, S.; Ji, X.; Pan, W. Predictions and mitigation strategies of PM2.5 concentration in the Yangtze River Delta of China based on a novel nonlinear seasonal grey model. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 276, 116614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ashbaugh, L.L.; Malm, W.C.; Sadeh, W.Z. A residence time probability analysis of sulfur concentrations at Grand Canyon National Park. Atmos. Environ. 1985, 19, 1263–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. The Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS). Available online: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/metadata/landing-page/bin/iso?id=gov.noaa.ncdc:C00379 (accessed on 3 April 2025).
  24. Polissar, A.V.; Hopke, P.K.; Poirot, R.L. Atmospheric aerosol over Vermont: Chemical composition and sources. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 4604–4621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dimitriou, K.; Kassomenos, P. Three year study of tropospheric ozone with back trajectories at a metropolitan and a medium scale urban area in Greece. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 502, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, H.; Cheng, S.; Wang, X.; Yao, S.; Zhu, F. Continuous monitoring, compositions analysis and the implication of regional transport for submicron and fine aerosols in Beijing, China. Atmos. Environ. 2018, 195, 30–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mao, M.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, X. Evaluation of MERRA-2 Black Carbon Characteristics and Potential Sources over China. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hsu, Y.K.; Holsen, T.M.; Hopke, P.K. Comparison of hybrid receptor models to locate PCB sources in Chicago. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 545–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Y.Q.; Zhang, X.Y.; Draxler, R.R. TrajStat: GIS-based software that uses various trajectory statistical analysis methods to identify potential sources from long-term air pollution measurement data. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2009, 24, 938–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, B.; Wu, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Yang, J.; Liang, D.; Dai, Q.; Bi, X.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Characterization and source apportionment of PM2.5 based on error estimation from EPA PMF 5.0 model at a medium city in China. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 222, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mao, M.; Rao, L.; Jiang, H.; He, S.; Zhang, X. Air Pollutants in Metropolises of Eastern Coastal China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 15332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, X.; Abdullah, L.C.; Sobri, S.; Said, M.S.M.; Hussain, S.A.; Aun, T.P.; Hu, J. Long-term spatiotemporal evolution and coordinated control of air pollutants in a typical mega-mountain city of Cheng-Yu region under the “dual carbon” goal. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2023, 73, 649–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, R.; Chen, J.; Gao, X.; Zhang, R. Spatiotemporal characteristics and infuencing factors of Air pollutants over port cities of the Yangtze River Delta. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2023, 16, 1587–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tian, D.; Fan, J.; Jin, H.; Mao, H.; Geng, D.; Hou, S. Characteristic and spatiotemporal variation of air pollution in Northern China based on correlation analysis and clustering analysis of five air pollutants. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2020, 125, e2019JD031931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shen, F.Z.; Ge, X.L.; Hu, J.L.; Nie, D.Y.; Tian, L.; Chen, M.D. Air pollution characteristics and health risks in Henan Province, China. Environ. Res. 2017, 156, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Air Quality Online Monitoring and Analysis Platform. Available online: https://www.aqistudy.cn/ (accessed on 3 April 2025).
  37. Baudic, A.; Gros, V.; Sauvage, S.; Locoge, N.; Sanchez, O.; Sarda-Esteve, R.; Kalogridis, C.; Petit, J.E.; Bonnaire, N.; Baisnee, D.; et al. Seasonal variability and source apportionment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the Paris megacity (France). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 11961–11989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tao, T.; Shi, Y.; Gilbert, K.M.; Liu, X. Spatiotemporal variations of air pollutants based on ground observation and emission sources over 19 Chinese urban agglomerations during 2015–2019. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhao, X.L.; Zhou, W.Q.; Han, L.J. Human activities and urban air pollution in Chinese mega city: An insight of ozone weekend effect in Beijing. Phys. Chem. Earth 2019, 110, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, Y.H.; Hu, B.; Ji, D.S.; Liu, Z.R.; Tang, G.Q.; Xin, J.Y.; Zhang, H.X.; Song, T.; Wang, L.L.; Gao, W.K.; et al. Ozone weekend effects in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan area, China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 2419–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zou, Y.; Charlesworth, E.; Yan, X.L.; Deng, X.J.; Li, F. The weekday/weekend ozone differences induced by the emissions change during summer and autumn in Guangzhou, China. Atmos. Environ. 2019, 199, 114–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, B.; Shi, X.; Liu, Y.; Lu, L.; Wang, G.; Thapa, S.; Sun, X.; Fu, D.; Wang, K.; Qi, H. Long-term characteristics of criteria air pollutants in megacities of Harbin-Changchun megalopolis, Northeast China: Spatiotemporal variations, source analysis, and meteorological effects. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 267, 115441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pang, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, B.; Wu, H.; Shi, K.; Li, J.; Xing, B.; Chen, L.; Wu, Z.; Dai, S.; et al. One-year spatiotemporal variations of air pollutants in a major chemical-industrypark in the Yangtze River Delta, China by 30 miniature air quality monitoring stations. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 1026842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP). Ambient Air Quality Standards, GB3095-2012; MEP: Beijing, China, 2012; pp. 1–6.
Figure 1. Locations of the sampling sites in Wuxi City. XL: Xue Lang, HX: Huang Xiang, CZ: Cao Zhang, QT: Qi Tang, DT: Dong Ting, WZ: Wang Zhuang, RX: Rong Xiang, YQ: Yan Qiao.
Figure 1. Locations of the sampling sites in Wuxi City. XL: Xue Lang, HX: Huang Xiang, CZ: Cao Zhang, QT: Qi Tang, DT: Dong Ting, WZ: Wang Zhuang, RX: Rong Xiang, YQ: Yan Qiao.
Atmosphere 16 00537 g001
Figure 2. The proportion of predominant pollutants in Wuxi during 2019 and 2023.
Figure 2. The proportion of predominant pollutants in Wuxi during 2019 and 2023.
Atmosphere 16 00537 g002
Figure 3. Diurnal variations of PM2.5 (a), PM10 (b), SO2 (c), NO2 (d), CO (e), and O3 (f).
Figure 3. Diurnal variations of PM2.5 (a), PM10 (b), SO2 (c), NO2 (d), CO (e), and O3 (f).
Atmosphere 16 00537 g003aAtmosphere 16 00537 g003b
Figure 4. PSCF maps for PM2.5 at Wuxi in 2019 and 2023. The center of Wuxi is marked with a cross, and the PSCF values are displayed in color.
Figure 4. PSCF maps for PM2.5 at Wuxi in 2019 and 2023. The center of Wuxi is marked with a cross, and the PSCF values are displayed in color.
Atmosphere 16 00537 g004
Figure 5. PSCF maps for 8h O3 at Wuxi in 2019 and 2023. The center of Wuxi is marked with a cross, and the PSCF values are displayed in color.
Figure 5. PSCF maps for 8h O3 at Wuxi in 2019 and 2023. The center of Wuxi is marked with a cross, and the PSCF values are displayed in color.
Atmosphere 16 00537 g005
Figure 6. CWT maps for PM2.5 at Wuxi in 2019 and 2023. The center of Wuxi is marked with a cross, and the CWT values are displayed in color.
Figure 6. CWT maps for PM2.5 at Wuxi in 2019 and 2023. The center of Wuxi is marked with a cross, and the CWT values are displayed in color.
Atmosphere 16 00537 g006
Figure 7. CWT maps for 8h O3 at Wuxi in 2019 and 2023. The center of Wuxi is marked with a cross, and the CWT values are displayed in color.
Figure 7. CWT maps for 8h O3 at Wuxi in 2019 and 2023. The center of Wuxi is marked with a cross, and the CWT values are displayed in color.
Atmosphere 16 00537 g007
Table 1. Summary of AQI and the concentrations of six criteria air pollutants in Wuxi during 2019 and 2023 a.
Table 1. Summary of AQI and the concentrations of six criteria air pollutants in Wuxi during 2019 and 2023 a.
YearAQIPM2.5
(µg/m3)
PM10
(µg/m3)
SO2
(µg/m3)
NO2
(µg/m3)
CO
(mg/m3)
8h O3
(µg/m3)
Substandard Ratio b
Annual201983.4 ± 33.539.6 ± 21.771.8 ± 37.28.3 ± 3.039.9 ± 16.8 0.9 ± 0.2104.6 ± 54.428.2%
202374.1 ± 32.129.3 ± 18.456.3 ± 37.47.8 ± 1.731.6 ± 17.20.8 ± 0.2105.0 ± 46.617.5%
Spring201982.8 ± 30.441.5 ± 16.479.2 ± 25.08.9 ± 2.441.5 ± 10.20.8 ± 0.2115.9 ± 47.923.9%
202382.3 ± 29.730.6 ± 11.773.1 ± 47.28.3 ± 1.529.8 ± 11.90.7 ± 0.1122.0 ± 40.710.9%
Summer201990.6 ± 41.526.3 ± 10.546.3 ± 16.46.4 ± 1.525.8 ± 7.90.7 ± 0.2143.1 ± 53.039.1%
202376.6 ± 39.417.5 ± 8.230.4 ± 13.16.5 ± 0.919.0 ± 5.90.7 ± 0.1127.3 ± 49.423.9%
Autumn201977.8 ± 28.334.2 ± 15.974.2 ± 44.28.5 ± 3.343.5 ± 17.50.9 ± 0.2104.6 ± 45.420.9%
202370.0 ± 26.827.5 ± 15.851.0 ± 26.98.0 ± 1.437.1 ± 15.90.9 ± 0.2106.2 ± 41.519.8%
Winter201982.2 ± 31.356.6 ± 27.887.9 ± 41.99.3 ± 3.649.9 ± 19.01.1 ± 0.253.5 ± 22.228.9%
202367.3 ± 29.341.6 ± 24.970.7 ± 36.48.4 ± 1.940.7 ± 22.10.9 ± 0.363.6 ± 20.415.6%
a The error denotes standard deviation, p < 0.05. b The percentage of days with AQI > 100.
Table 2. Statistics of meteorological parameters at Wuxi *.
Table 2. Statistics of meteorological parameters at Wuxi *.
Meteorological ParametersYearTotalSpringSummerAutumnWinter
T (°C)201917.416.727.419.46.0
202317.817.728.219.55.9
Tmax (°C)201921.821.831.524.09.8
202322.722.932.524.610.9
Tmin (°C)201913.612.123.915.42.9
202313.713.224.715.21.9
RH (%)201972.165.074.672.176.6
202370.563.276.173.269.4
WS (m/s)20192.02.12.21.91.9
20232.02.41.91.81.9
Pre (mm)20141030.5158.1441.1178.5252.8
20151266.0179737.9194.2154.9
* Note: mean values for air temperature (T), maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), relative humidity (RH), wind speed (WS), accumulated value of precipitation (Pre).
Table 3. Average diurnal concentrations of six criteria air pollutants at eight stations in Wuxi during 2023 (the units are µg/m3 for PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, and 8h O3; and mg/m3 for CO).
Table 3. Average diurnal concentrations of six criteria air pollutants at eight stations in Wuxi during 2023 (the units are µg/m3 for PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, and 8h O3; and mg/m3 for CO).
StationDescriptionPM2.5PM10SO2NO2CO8h O3
urban district
HXHuang Xiang29.3 65.3 7.7 39.8 0.9 105.0
CZCao Zhang29.5 55.8 7.8 34.5 0.9 101.2
DTDong Ting30.8 58.1 8.5 35.8 0.9105.8
WZWang Zhuang29.3 55.8 7.1 35.3 0.9 105.4
YQYang Qiao29.0 57.9 7.7 31.9 0.9 105.5
the north shore of Taihu Lake
XLXue Lang27.0 54.9 6.7 24.8 0.8 110.3
QTQi Tang27.9 50.87.4 24.6 0.8 109.3
RXRong Xiang28.3 49.8 9.8 25.9 0.8 107.0
Table 4. Pearson correlations between six pollutants and meteorological elements a: 0.50–1.00 (strong positive correlation), 0.25–0.49 (moderate positive correlation), 0–0.25 (weak positive correlation), −0.25 to 0 (weak negative correlation), −0.50 to −0.25 (moderate negative correlation), and −1.00 to −0.50 (strong negative correlation).
Table 4. Pearson correlations between six pollutants and meteorological elements a: 0.50–1.00 (strong positive correlation), 0.25–0.49 (moderate positive correlation), 0–0.25 (weak positive correlation), −0.25 to 0 (weak negative correlation), −0.50 to −0.25 (moderate negative correlation), and −1.00 to −0.50 (strong negative correlation).
PM2.5 1 > R ≥ 0.5
PM100.86 ** 0.5 > R ≥ 0.25
SO20.62 **0.69 ** 0.25 > R ≥ 0
NO20.67 **0.72 **0.63 ** 0 > R ≥ −0.25
CO0.80 **0.62 **0.47 **0.56 ** –0.25 > R ≥ −0.5
8h O3−0.11 *0.000.09−0.25 **−0.24 ** −0.5 > R ≥ −1
T−0.49 **−0.41 **−0.32 **−0.49 **−0.46 **0.65 **
Tmax−0.42 **−0.30 **−0.21 **−0.40 **−0.43 **0.72 **0.98 **
Tmin−0.54 **−0.51 **−0.43 **−0.56 **−0.47 **0.52 **0.97 **0.91 **
WS−0.33 **−0.30 **−0.34 **−0.50 **−0.38 **−0.030.15 **0.12 *0.19 **
RH−0.08−0.34 **−0.51 **−0.13 *0.18 **−0.45 **−0.04−0.15 **0.090.00
Pre−0.20 **−0.28 **−0.31 **−0.18 **−0.04−0.20 **0.05−0.010.12 *0.15 **0.42 **
PM2.5PM10SO2NO2CO8h O3TTmaxTminWSRHPre
a Note: mean values for air temperature (T), maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), wind speed (WS), relative humidity (RH), and precipitation (Pre). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mao, M.; Wu, X.; Zhang, Y. Spatiotemporal Patterns and Regional Transport Contributions of Air Pollutants in Wuxi City. Atmosphere 2025, 16, 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050537

AMA Style

Mao M, Wu X, Zhang Y. Spatiotemporal Patterns and Regional Transport Contributions of Air Pollutants in Wuxi City. Atmosphere. 2025; 16(5):537. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050537

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mao, Mao, Xiaowei Wu, and Yahui Zhang. 2025. "Spatiotemporal Patterns and Regional Transport Contributions of Air Pollutants in Wuxi City" Atmosphere 16, no. 5: 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050537

APA Style

Mao, M., Wu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Spatiotemporal Patterns and Regional Transport Contributions of Air Pollutants in Wuxi City. Atmosphere, 16(5), 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050537

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop