Next Article in Journal
The Spatio-Temporal Onset Characteristics of Indian Summer Monsoon Rainfall and Their Relationship with Climate Indices
Next Article in Special Issue
Extreme Value Analysis of NOx Air Pollution in the Winter Seaport of Varna
Previous Article in Journal
Reliability of Lower-Cost Sensors in the Analysis of Indoor Air Quality on Board Ships
Previous Article in Special Issue
Air Pollution and Economic Impact from Ships Operating in the Port of Varna
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of the Carbon Intensity of Container Shipping on Trunk Routes: Referring to the Decarbonization Trajectory of the Poseidon Principle

1
Department of Shipping and Transportation Management, Office of Marine Science and Technology, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 811, Taiwan
2
Taiwan International Ports Corporation Ltd., Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan
3
Taiwan Navigation Co., Ltd., Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2022, 13(10), 1580; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101580
Submission received: 4 August 2022 / Revised: 20 September 2022 / Accepted: 26 September 2022 / Published: 27 September 2022

Abstract

Container shipping industries are highly capital intensive. If shipping carriers want to execute international shipping financing, they must follow the IMO emission reduction targets and meet the decarbonization trajectory of the Poseidon Principle (PP). This article used an activity-based model to calculate container shipping industry carbon emissions. It was found that the carbon intensity per unit for each ship was decreased because of the upsizing of container vessels and route deployment based on the alliance strategy. On the Asia–Europe (A/E) trunk route, as the ship size increased from 11,300 to 24,000 TEU, the results showed that the carbon intensity ranged from 6.48 to 3.06 g/ton-nm. It is also proven that the mega-container deployment on the A/E trunk route followed the decarbonization trajectory proposed by PP, while the Asia–Pacific trunk route was not fully in line with the trajectory of EEOI/AER. It is worth noting that starting from 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, shipping companies deployed a higher number of small-size vessels to boost revenues, resulting in more pollutants produced and a mismatch of the trajectory proposed by PP.
Keywords: container shipping; the Poseidon Principle; carbon intensity; decarbonization trajectory container shipping; the Poseidon Principle; carbon intensity; decarbonization trajectory

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tai, H.-H.; Chang, Y.-H.; Chang, C.-W.; Wang, Y.-M. Analysis of the Carbon Intensity of Container Shipping on Trunk Routes: Referring to the Decarbonization Trajectory of the Poseidon Principle. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101580

AMA Style

Tai H-H, Chang Y-H, Chang C-W, Wang Y-M. Analysis of the Carbon Intensity of Container Shipping on Trunk Routes: Referring to the Decarbonization Trajectory of the Poseidon Principle. Atmosphere. 2022; 13(10):1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101580

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tai, Hui-Huang, Yun-Hua Chang, Chin-Wei Chang, and Yu-Meng Wang. 2022. "Analysis of the Carbon Intensity of Container Shipping on Trunk Routes: Referring to the Decarbonization Trajectory of the Poseidon Principle" Atmosphere 13, no. 10: 1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101580

APA Style

Tai, H.-H., Chang, Y.-H., Chang, C.-W., & Wang, Y.-M. (2022). Analysis of the Carbon Intensity of Container Shipping on Trunk Routes: Referring to the Decarbonization Trajectory of the Poseidon Principle. Atmosphere, 13(10), 1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101580

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop