Next Article in Journal
Direct and Indirect Effects of Urease and Nitrification Inhibitors on N2O-N Losses from Urea Fertilization to Winter Wheat in Southern Germany
Next Article in Special Issue
Achieving Carbon Neutrality for A Future Large Greenhouse Gas Emitter in Quebec, Canada: A Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
Traceable Determination of Atmospheric Mercury Using Iodinated Activated Carbon Traps
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Relationship of Energy and CO2 Emissions with GDP per Capita in Colombia
Article

Energy Balances and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Agriculture in the Shihezi Oasis of China

by 1,2,3, 4 and 1,2,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, China
2
College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China
3
College of Information and Science Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
4
Xinjiang Western Animal Husbandry Limited Company, Shihezi 832000, Xinjiang, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2020, 11(8), 781; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11080781
Received: 1 June 2020 / Revised: 10 July 2020 / Accepted: 12 July 2020 / Published: 24 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation: Feasibility and Economics)
The objective of this study was to evaluate the difference of crop and livestock products regarding energy balances, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, carbon economic efficiency, and water use efficiency using a life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology on farms in three sub-oases within the Shihezi Oasis of China. The three sub-oases were selected within the Gobi Desert, at Shizongchang (SZC), Xiayedi (XYD), and Mosuowan (MSW), to represent the various local oasis types: i. Oasis; ii. overlapping oasis-desert; and iii. Gobi oasis. The results indicated that crop production in XYD Oasis had higher energy balances (221.47 GJ/ha), and a net energy ratio (5.39), than in the other two oases (p < 0.01). The production of 1 kg CW of sheep in XYD Oasis resulted in significantly higher energy balances (18.31 MJ/kg CW), and an energy ratio (2.21), than in the other two oases (p < 0.01). The water use efficiency of crop production in the SZC Oasis was lower than that of the XYD and MSW oases (p < 0.05). Alfalfa production generated the lowest CO2-eq emissions (8.09 Mg CO2-eq/ha. year) and had the highest water use efficiency (45.82 MJ/m3). Alfalfa (1.18 ¥/kg CO2-eq) and maize (1.14 ¥/kg CO2-eq) had a higher carbon economic efficiency than other crops (p < 0.01). The main sources of GHG emissions for crop production were fertilizer and irrigation. The structural equation modelling (SEM) of agricultural systems in the Shihezi Oasis showed that the livestock category significantly influenced the economic income, energy, and carbon balances. View Full-Text
Keywords: Shihezi Oasis; agricultural production systems; life cycle assessment; energy balances; greenhouse gas emissions Shihezi Oasis; agricultural production systems; life cycle assessment; energy balances; greenhouse gas emissions
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Yan, Z.; Hou, F.; Hou, F. Energy Balances and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Agriculture in the Shihezi Oasis of China. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11080781

AMA Style

Yan Z, Hou F, Hou F. Energy Balances and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Agriculture in the Shihezi Oasis of China. Atmosphere. 2020; 11(8):781. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11080781

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yan, Zhengang; Hou, Fuqin; Hou, Fujiang. 2020. "Energy Balances and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Agriculture in the Shihezi Oasis of China" Atmosphere 11, no. 8: 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11080781

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop